Developing Inclusive Social Policies: Education for Azerbaijan's Internally Displaced

7/27/2019 Developing Inclusive Social Policies: Education for Azerbaijan's Internally Displaced

1/28

Developing an Inclusive Social

Policy: Azerbaijans IDP schools

Center for Innovations in EducationVitaly Radsky


2/28

1. Data

Is there a difference in educational achievement

between IDP and non-IDP schools and regions?

2.How and Why?

- Social exclusion concept

3. Policy


3/28

IDP Schools in Azerbaijan (5 regions)

Fuzuli

Agdam

Lachin

Susa

Qubadli


4/28

Question 1: Is there a difference between the

school achievement of IDP and non-IDP regions?

H0= There is no difference between the

university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP

schools in Azerbaijan.

HA= There is a significant difference between

the university admission rate of IDP and non-

IDP schools in Azerbaijan.


5/28

National

2 (1, N = 86857) = 38.148, p


6/28

2 (1, N = 74779) = 28.053, p


7/28

Urban Areas

82%

34%

87%

44%

% of students receiving diploma applying to

university

% of students receiving diploma accepted to

university

Urban education: IDP vs. Non-IDP, 2012

IDP Urban Average National Urban Average

2 (1, N = 28962) = 47.268, p


8/28

Rural Areas

58%

16%

58%

22%


university


university

Rural education: IDP vs. Non-IDP, 2012

IDP Total (Rural) National Rural Average

2 (1, N = 44294) = 26.667, p


9/28

Result

HA= There is a significant difference betweenthe university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP schools in Azerbaijan.

Nationally, and when controlling for school

location, IDP schools send proportionallyfewer students to university than non-IDPschools.


10/28



11/28

83%

37%

88%

46%


university


university

Baku education: IDP vs. Non-IDP, 2012

IDP Average (Baku) Baku Azerage

2 (1, N = 21067) = 21.668, p < .01.

There is a significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to

university from IDP schools based in Baku and non-IDP Baku schools. The differencein proportion of students accepted to universities were significant between Baku and


12/28

46%

42%39%

36%* 36%*

30%*

% of students receiving secondary school diploma admitted to university

IDP Schools in Baku, 2012

Baku Azerage Lachin (in Baku) Qubadli (in Baku)

Susa (in Baku) Fuzuli (in Baku) Agdam (in Baku)

2 (1, N = 21067) = 27.493, p < .01.


university between Baku non-IDP schools and Baku-based Susa, Fuzuli, and Agdamschools.


13/28


Lachin- 82 schools

Rural- 45 (55%) Urban- 37 (45%)

Agcabedi- 23 Baku- 30 (36%)

Barda- 9 Sumgayit- 7

Others- 5 (Agsu, Sheki, Goranboy,Oguz, Beyleqan)


14/28

37%

45%

% of students receiving a secondary school diploma accepted to university

Lachin Urban vs. Sumgayit and Baku, 2012

Lachin Urban (Sumgayit and Baku) Sumgayit and Baku Average

(z = -3.07, p < .05, one-tailed)


university between Lachin Baku and Sumgayit based schools and non-IDP schoolsIn Baku and Sumgayit.


15/28

17%

26%


Lachin Rural vs. non-IDP Rural, 2012

Lachin Rural Average of the rural regions where Lachin schools are located

(z = -2.933, p < .05, one-tailed)


university between Lachin rural-based schools and non-IDP schools based in the rural

regions where Lachin schools are located.


16/28

Result

HA= There is a significant difference between

the university admission rate of IDP and non-

IDP schools in Azerbaijan.

When controlling for school location, IDP

schools send proportionally fewer students to

university than non-IDP schools.


17/28

Question 2: What role does geography

have in the differing results of IDP schools?

H0= There is no difference in the university

admission rate in schools in different IDP

regions in Azerbaijan.

HA= There is a significant difference in the

university admission rate between schools in

different IDP regions in Azerbaijan.


18/28

36% 36%33%

31%30% 30% 29%

26%

21%18%


University Admissions by IDP Region: National,

2012Qubadl rayonu Zngilan rayonu ua rayonu Klbcr rayonu

Cbrayl rayonu Xocal rayonu Lan rayonu Xocavnd rayonuAdam rayonu Fzuli rayonu

2 (9, N = 3942) = 77.53886, p


19/28



20/28

37%35% 34% 33%

29%

% of students receiving diploma accepted to university

Comparison between IDP Regions: Urban, 2012

Lachin Urban Susha Urban Qubadli Urban Fuzuli Urban Agdam Urban

2 (4, N = 1156) = 3.836, p >.1.

There is no significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to

university among students studying in urban-based IDP schools (5 IDP regions).


21/28

18%17%

13%

% of students receiving a diploma applying to university

Comparison between IDP regions: Rural, 2012

Agdam Rural Lachin Rural Fuzuli Rural

2 (2, N = 1339) = 4.3695, p >.1.

There is no significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to

university among students studying in rural-based IDP schools (5 IDP regions).


22/28

Result

Ho= There is not a significant difference in theuniversity admission rate between schools indifferent IDP regions in Azerbaijan, once locationof school is controlled.

What separates overall lower achieving IDPregions such as Agdam and higher achievingregions such as Qubadli is school location, ratherthan something like regional educationmanagement.


23/28

IDPs: Disadvantaged or Not?


24/28

Social Exclusion

a way of conceptualizing society, including (and

with a focus on) the processes of deprivation

that are an integral part of that society.

-de Haan, 2000

1) Multidimensionality

2) Causation (how and why) interactions, processes, actors, and institutions

that include some groups and exclude others.

-de Haan, 2000


25/28

Stigma and Isolation

Some people compare Sumgait schools with

Sumgait IDP schoolthis is not fair. They have

richer parents, we have a IDP status label, that

is why there is a small number of students who

want to come to our school. (Qubadli

teacher, FGD, 2011)


26/28

Educational Human Resources

a good young teacher will never chose an IDP

school over a regular school when choosing a

job. (Baku Education Inspector, Interview,

2011)


27/28

Conclusion

1. Disadvantaged or Not?

We need more data comparing educational resultsof IDP and non-IDP students.

2. Why and How?

Social exclusion offers a new way to look atdeprivation and inequality in Azerbaijan.

3. What Policies?


28/28

Thank You

Center for Innovations in Educationwww.cie.az

Vitaly Radsky

[email protected]
http://www.cie.az/http://www.cie.az/

Developing Inclusive Social Policies: Education for Azerbaijan's Internally Displaced

Documents