Top Banner
©2011 MFMER | slide-1 Developing, Implementing, and Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS Robert R. Freimuth, Ph.D. Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Applied Clinical Informatics AMIA TBI – March 18, 2013
23

Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

Nov 07, 2014

Download

Documents

Vadim Pavlov

2013 Summit on Translational Bioinformatics
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-1

Developing, Implementing, and Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS

Robert R. Freimuth, Ph.D.Biomedical Statistics and Informatics,Applied Clinical Informatics

AMIA TBI – March 18, 2013

Page 2: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-2

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) CDS

• Mayo Clinic PGx CDS

• Case Study: Abacavir

• Challenges

• Challenges for Genomics-Based CDS

• Sharing Knowledge

• Standardization

• Challenges of the Future

Page 3: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-3

EHR at Mayo Clinic, Rochester

• >12 different systems that store primary data

• GE

• Started from a partnership with HP in late 1980s

• Mainframe design

• Blaze Advisor rule engine

• Built for large-scale financial applications (FICO)

• Designed for complex, multi-faceted problems

• Full forward and backward chaining logic

• Tightly coupled to data sources

Page 4: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-4

CDS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester

• Developing CDS solutions for >20 years

• Initially developed over home-grown EHR

• Batch-oriented rules for events and conditions

• Standalone systems for different departments• e.g., Pharmacy, Infectious Disease

• Started using Blaze ~2005

• Provided real-time CDS

• >100 high-level rules composed of ~1000 atomic rules

Page 5: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-5

CDS Rule Development Process

• Synthesis of clinical knowledge

• Committee approvals

• Technical specifications

• UI screen design

• Web service calls, database queries

• Implementation and deployment

• Compiling

• Loading to rule servers on mainframe

• Run modes

• Silent

• "Live"

Page 6: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-6

Abacavir and HLA-B*5701

• Abacavir

• Nucleoside RT-inhibitor for HIV infection

• HLA-B

• >1500 known variants

• *5701 allele is associated with life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir

• Results are either "positive" or "negative"

• At Mayo Clinic, *5701 screening is recommended:

• Prior to initiating treatment with abacavir

• Prior to reinitiation of abacavir in patients of unknown HLA-B*5701 status who have previously tolerated abacavir

Page 7: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-7

Abacavir-HLA B*5701: Governance

• Executive sponsors:

• Center for Individualized Medicine

• Pharmacogenomics Task Force

• Mayo Pharmacy Formulary Committee

• Disease-Oriented Task Force: ID

• Other committee approvals:

• Practice Convergence Council (MC-CPC)

• MC Clinical Decision Support Subcommittee

• Implementation

• Site-based P&T committees, coordinate with CIM

• Local CDS teams

Page 8: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-8

Abacavir-HLA B*5701 Workflow

Internal lab result?

External lab result?

What is it?

Capture result

Inbox message

Prompt for test

Page 9: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-9

Abacavir-HLA B*5701 Results

• Text report

• MCF, MCA, MCHS

• Structured data

• MCR

• Storage of results

• Internal: lab test

• External: custom table

• Added as an allergy

Page 10: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-10

Challenges: Abacavir

• Currently using the Allergy model

• Can be deleted or altered

• Policy for positive test/deleted allergy

• Not a true allergy

• Reaction has not occurred, but is possible

• Storing external results in a custom table

• Inaccessible by other systems (e.g., pharmacy)

• Providers can't see entries from prior admissions

Page 11: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-11

Challenges: External Results

• Capture

• Streamline current alert-heavy process

• Representation

• Test orders and results change over time

• Storage

• "Clinical event" (MCF/MCA)

• "Observation/finding" (MCR)

• Exchange

• CDA (partial solution for providers?)

• Clinical notes (patient-reported data)

Page 12: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-12

Challenges: Enterprise-Level

• Coordination across the Mayo enterprise (multi-site)

• Group formed to focus on challenges related to the implementation of PGx CDS

• Identify issues with our current infrastucture

• Identify bottlenecks in processes

• Propose short and long term solutions

• Consensus for functional requirements

• Abacavir vs. Carbamazepine

Page 13: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-13

Challenges: Education

• Clinical knowledge

• Proactive: Videos, articles

• On-demand: AskMayoExpert (AME)

• Contextual: Alerts link to AME

• Rule implementation

• Consequences of going against recommendation

• "If the patient has been on abacavir for 10 years, do I still need to order the test?"

• Workflow

• "If I click yes (or no), how many more alerts will pop up?"

Page 14: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-14

Generalizing

A

T C

G

N

Page 15: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-15

Measuring Outcomes of PGx CDS

• Evaluating effectiveness

• What data should be captured?

• Case-by-case decision?

• Increased effectiveness of therapy

• Decreased adverse reactions or complications

• Fiscal responsibility

• Over-testing

• Time to resolution

• Increased efficiency of healthcare delivery

Page 16: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-16

Refining PGx CDS

• Create highly specific triggers

• Limit by drug, genotype

• Ethnicity?

• Requires accurate data, not always available

• Probabilities?

• Allele, adverse reaction, effective treatment

• Context-sensitive

• IL28B, peginterferon, and hepatitis C

• Timing: diagnosis vs. CPOE

Page 17: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-17

Increasing Complexity of Genomics CDS

• Evolution from "simple" CDS to guided workflows

• Context-sensitive expert systems

• Require provider input

• Prompt for data (e.g., family history)

• Technical limitations in popup alerts

• Important for complex decisions

• Need to capture clinical judgement

• Not limited to genomics…

Page 18: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-18

Sharing Knowledge…

• Human-readable text

• PharmGKB

• Structured representations

• TPP/CPIC tables

• Semantically computable

• PGx Guideline Repository

• Implementation-independent algorithms

• Generalized syntax, metadata

• Executable code (local adoption)

Tuesday

Posters

Page 19: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-19

Sharing Knowledge… Is Hard

• Who?

• Many stakeholders

• What?

• Institutional vs. national standards of care

• Not everything is generalizable

• Where?

• Distributed vs. Centralized

• How?

• Knowledgebases

• Code libraries

• Web services

Main

tenance

Governance

Page 20: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-20

Standardization

• Guideline development and interpretation

• Clinical practice and standard of care

• Allele definitions (molecular)

• Nomenclature is only part of the solution

• Stability

• Inferrence

• Phenotype definitions

• Genotype-phenotype translation

• Test results

• Sequence vs. interpretation

• CDS rules

HealtheDecisions

Page 21: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-21

Challenges of the Future

• Combinatorial expansion, complexity

• Gene-Drug / Gene-Drug Class

• Gene-Gene-Drug / Pathway-Drug

• Advances in knowledge

• Stable representation of results

• Sequence? Interpretation?

• Reinterpretation process

• Store updated results

• Educate providers

• Advances in technology

• Merge, reconcile results

Page 22: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-22

Challenges of the Future

• Genome on a thumb drive

• The ultimate in patient-provided data

• Patient mobility

Page 23: Developing, Implementing, And Sharing Pharmacogenomics CDS (TBI Panel)

©2011 MFMER | slide-23

Acknowledgements – Abacavir Implementation

• Michelle Elliott, MD

• Joseph Paul, MD

• David Blair, MD

• John Black, MD (DLMP)

• Joseph Yao, MD (DLMP)

• Robert Freimuth, PhD (Knowledge Engineering)

• Jyotishman Pathak, PhD (Knowledge Engineering)

• Mark Siska, RPh

• Kelly Wix, DPh

• Pedro Caraballo, MD (GIM)

• Robert Bleimeyer (Blaze, MN)

• Mark Dobie (Blaze, MN)

• Padma Rao (Blaze, MN)

• Liz Clark (Cerner, AZ)

• Gaurav Jain (Cerner, MCHS)

• Charles Pugh (Cerner, FL)

• Cloann Schultz (PM, CIM)

• Caer Vitek (Education, CIM)

• Donald Gabrielson (PM)

• and many others