Developing a National Framework for the Effective Use of Lesson Observation in Further Education – Key Findings from UCU Project Report UCET May 2014 Dr Matt O’Leary CRADLE University of Wolverhampton Email: [email protected] Twitter: @drmattoleary
Apr 01, 2015
Developing a National Framework for the Effective Use of Lesson
Observation in Further Education – Key Findings from UCU Project Report
UCET May 2014
Dr Matt O’LearyCRADLE
University of WolverhamptonEmail: [email protected]
Twitter: @drmattoleary
Key questions
1. What do we know about current approaches to lesson observation?
2. How have we got to where we are now?3. What do practitioners think about current
approaches to observation?4. How might the education sector make
better use of lesson observation in the future?
5. What needs to change for this to happen?
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Backdrop to the project
• The use of lesson observation is a polemical topic
• Flashpoint in colleges – cause of on-going tension, grievances, disputes etc
What’s the purpose of lesson observation in FE?• To improve the quality of teaching and learning• To benchmark performance against the Common
Inspection Framework (CIF)• To inform and provide an evidence base for the
institution’s self-assessment/self-evaluation systems
• To promote a culture of continuous improvement amongst staff
• To identify staff development needs
(Adapted from O’Leary 2014: 78)
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Overview of research design
Mixed-methods study
Sample: UCU Members (n =
4000)
Participants: lecturers, middle &
senior managers
Phase 1 – online survey
Phase 2 – Interviews & focus groups
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
What do we know about the current use(s) of lesson observation in FE?
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
How have we got to this point?
• Neo-liberal reform of curriculum > ‘Market-inspired managerialism’ (Hogan 1995) & ‘managerialist positivism’ (Smith & O’Leary 2013)
• Age of Performativity (Ball 2012)• Lesson observation as a CRUCIBLE for
Quality Assurance/Improvement in T & L• Reliance on lesson observation as one of
the key data sources for Ofsted inspections
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
What do practitioners think of current approaches to
lesson observation?
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Thematic category Sub-related theme/issueCounterproductive effects of observation
Punitive effect/use of observations (especially graded) are seen as a ‘stick’ with which to beat staff instead of a tool for CPD/not very helpful or developmental
Graded observations are regarded as ‘box-ticking’/’jumping through hoops’ exercises
High levels of stress and anxiety caused by current graded observation regimes
Unannounced observations causing increased stress Too much emphasis on judging and measuring performance rather
than concrete support on how to improve Teaching and Learning (T & L)
Lack of trust in professionalism of teaching staff Time spent preparing for formal, graded observations is
incommensurate with the perceived benefits/impact Focus of observations driven by latest Ofsted priorities rather than
genuine interest in excellence in T & LObservation as a form of assessment
Unfair to judge practitioners’ capabilities on snapshot observations; they should be more inclusive of other key indicators such as student achievement rates, student evaluations, peer review etc
Concerns regarding the validity and reliability of judgement through lesson observation
Inauthenticity of observations makes them unreliable instruments for judging practitioners’ capabilities and identifying underperforming staff
Observer issues Importance of subject specialist observers Need for observers to demonstrate outstanding, current practice to
have professional credibility Observers need to be fully trained and update their skills
continuously Inconsistency (some good & bad) and subjectivity of observer
judgements Lack of prioritisation and timeliness of the feedback given by some
observersObservation as a formative tool
Importance of observation as a ‘learning tool’ – especially the benefits of ungraded feedback by ‘critical friend’
Value of peer observations
Counterproductive effects (some examples)• Punitive effect/use of observations (especially
graded) are seen as a ‘stick’ with which to beat staff instead of a tool for CPD/not very helpful or developmental
• Graded observations are regarded as ‘box-ticking’ or ’jumping through hoops’ exercises
• High levels of stress and anxiety caused by current graded observation regimes
• Time spent preparing for formal, graded observations is incommensurate with the perceived benefits/impact
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Increased stress and anxietyLesson observations cause me massive stress. They make me ill & destroy my quality of life,
upset my work life balance. I am now considered disabled under the Equality Act
2010 due to the stress inducing regime adopted at the college where I work that caused me to be absent long term. A fear culture has been created, I used to love my job now I hate it
(895)
(Based on UCU Project Report 2013)
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Impact on self-esteem & self-efficacy
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Labelling of teachers
• Evidence of implicit & explicit labelling of teachers’ performance
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Cultures of fear
• High stakes assessment of graded observations leads to the creation of ‘cultures of fear’
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Observation as a form of assessment (some examples)• Unfair to judge practitioners’ capabilities on
snapshot observations; they should be more inclusive of other key indicators such as student achievement rates, student evaluations, peer review etc
• Inauthenticity of observations makes them unreliable instruments for judging practitioners’ capabilities and identifying underperforming staff
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
The myth of measurement
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Figure 14 – Multi-dimensional model of teacher appraisal
Sources of
evidence
Observations of practice
Learner feedback & evaluations
Staff self-evaluations
Peer review
Learner attendance
Learner attainment
Learner completion
rates
External verification
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
How might the education sector make better use of observation?
• Emphasise the FORMATIVE use of observation as a tool for teacher learning over the summative
• Prioritise the ‘pre-observation’ meeting, feedback AND feed forward stages of the observation process & embed time in staff workload
How might the education sector make better use of observation?
• Allow for greater experimentation with ‘alternative’ models of observation. For example:
1. The Differentiated Model2. The ‘Catchphrase’ Model 3. The Lesson Study Model
How might the education sector make better use of observation?
• Accept the strengths & limitations of observation as a method
• Exploit its potential as a tool for educational inquiry
• Combine observation with other forms of data collection/evidence
What needs to change for this to happen?Need for root and branch reform of normalised models of observation. Efforts to ‘tinker’ with the system likely to have minimal impact
What needs to change for this to happen?
Educators, policy makers & inspectors need to break free from the assessment straitjacket that conceptually constrains the use of observation
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
What needs to change for this to happen?Acknowledge that improving the use of observation is not just about PEDAGOGY but also about issues of POWER and TRUST
What needs to change for this to happen?
Contexts & cultures of teacher learning & growth are essential to the creation & implementation of alternative models of observation
Recommendations
1. Explore alternative models of observation2. Prioritise the professional development
needs of staff 3. Formal allocation of timetabled hours for
observation: pre-observation, feedback & feed-forward meetings
4. Need for a multi-dimensional model of teacher assessment
5. Stop relying on the Ofsted 4-point scale to assess & measure observations
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Recommendations
6. Review observation assessment criteria & embed the professional standards for FE
7. Introduce statutory training AND qualifications for observers
8. Involve teacher educators in the creation of observation schemes
9. Sever links between formal observations and capability procedures
10. Support for underperforming tutors
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
ReferencesBall, S. J. (2012) Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. London: Routledge.Hogan, P. (1995) The Custody and Courtship of Experience: Western Education in Philosophical Perspective. Blackrock, Co. Dublin: Columbia Press.O’Leary, M. (2014) Classroom Observation: A Guide to the Effective Observation of Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.Smith, R. & O’Leary, M. (2013) NPM in an Age of Austerity: Knowledge and Experience in Further Education, Journal of Educational Administration and History, Vol. 45(3), pp. 244-266.UCU (2013) Developing a National Framework for the Effective Use of Lesson Observation in Further Education, Project Report for University and College Union, Nov 2013
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
CRADLECentre for Research &
Development in Lifelong Education
Want to know more?
20% discount on the paperback version of thebook. Enter KRK57 at the checkout online at:http://routledge.com/u/oleary/
Kindle version via Amazon:
http://goo.gl/jisYgP