Main Headquarters: 120 Water Street, Suite 350, North Andover, MA 01845 With offices in: NY, ME, TX, CA, OR www.ers-inc.com DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS PROTOCOL FOR INTEGRATION IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS IN THE NORTHEAST Lead Author: Brian McCowan Co-Authors: Gary Epstein (ERS) Don Fudge (NEEP) presented by Brian McCowan ENERGY & RESOURCE SOLUTIONS ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Main Headquarters: 120 Water Street, Suite 350, North Andover, MA 01845 With offices in: NY, ME, TX, CA, OR
www.ers-inc.com
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS PROTOCOL FORINTEGRATION IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS IN THE NORTHEAST
Lead Author: Brian McCowan Co-Authors: Gary Epstein (ERS) Don Fudge (NEEP)
presented byBrian McCowanENERGY & RESOURCE SOLUTIONSACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
What is
Northeast High Performance Schools Exchange Established in 2003 Managed by Northeast Energy
Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP) Participants Include All of the New
England States & NY, NJ, PA Goal - Majority of New and
Renovated Schools to Implement High Performance Design, Construction and Operation by 2010
Develop and Maintain a Regional High Performance School Protocol that Promotes Excellent Learning Environments that are Energy Efficient, Cost-Effective and Utilize Sustainable Technologies
Northeast Regional High Performance Schools Protocol
Task:
Develop and Maintain a Regional High Performance School Protocol that Promotes Excellent Learning Environments that are Energy Efficient, Cost-Effective and Utilize Sustainable Technologies
Funding:Henry P. Kendall FoundationMassachusetts Technology CollaborativeRatepayer-funded energy efficiency programs in Connecticut, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts and New York.
Is a Regional Protocol Needed?
Five States in the Northeast have Officially Adopted a Voluntary (Funding Incentives) or Mandatory High Performance Schools ProgramThe Following Documents Are Variously Used For Compliance
Collaborative for High Performance Schools CHPS
ASHRAE Standards 90.1 & 62
State Energy Code
LEED
Advanced Buildings Guidelines Benchmark
School Administrators and the Design Community Desire Some Consistency
Establish a Protocol That: Is Flexible and Can be Applied to Fit Specific States’ Needs Is Cost Effective Places the Primary Emphasis on Educational Performance
(Lighting, Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Comfort, etc.) Promotes Energy Efficiency in a Way That Compliments
Energy Efficiency Programs in the Participant State Maintains Societal Environmental Standards as Primarily
Voluntary Credits (Attract School Administrators) Emphasizes High Performance School Policies That Must Be
Maintained
Concerns From Exchange Members
“Things are Different Here in fill in your state here”
Winter Heating Climate Much of the Northeast is Rural LEED and CHPS Seem to Give Equal
Weight to Environmental Issues, Educational Performance and Energy Issues
LEED and CHPS Energy Efficiency Sections Viewed as too Lenient and Difficult to Quantify and Enforce
HPS Schools Programs and Energy Efficiency Programs
Each State Maintains SBC Funded Energy Efficiency Programs and Tax/Grant Funded HPS Schools ProgramThe Energy Criteria For Efficiency Program Incentives Differs From The Energy Criteria For High Performance Schools Programs in Each of The Participating States
HUH?
Key Protocol Provisions
Required PO PR.1 The school district must create a high performance design advisory committee to oversee the implementation of an integrated design approach and ensure that the high performance standards and the overall goals of the protocol are met.
Policy & Operations
Required PO PR.4 A school maintenance plan must be implemented that includes an inventory of all energy using equipment in the new or renovated school and its preventive maintenance needs.
Required PO PR.5 Pass a resolution that requires that all newly purchased equipment and appliances to be used in the school be ENERGY STAR® -compliant.
Required PO PR.6 Adopt a no idling policy that applies to all school buses used to transport the students of the school. The policy must include the following minimum provisions…
1 Credit PO EC.2.1 Commit for a period of two years to purchasing, at either the municipal or school district level, Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) or clean renewable electricity for the equivalent of at least 25% of the school’s projected annual electricity needs.
2 Credits PO EC 2.2 Commit for a period of two years to purchasing, at either the municipal or school district level, Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) or clean renewable electricity for the equivalent of at least 50% of the school’s projected annual electricity needs.
Key Protocol Provisions
Indoor Environmental QualityRequired IEQ P 1. Provide direct line of sight to view glazing in 70% of classrooms
and administration areas.
Required IEQ P 2. Natural Light (Daylighting) in Classrooms: Design to achieve a 2% minimum daylight factor of uniformly distributed natural light on the floor area in 75% of the classrooms.
Required
IEQ P 3. Install electric lighting system to enhance occupants’ visual performance with pendant or ceiling mounted high performance lighting fixtures. The lighting fixtures must incorporate High Performance “Super” T8 or T5 technology and include glare control features.
Required
IEQ P 5. Meet the minimum ventilation rate requirements of ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
Key Protocol Provisions
Energy EfficiencyRequired
EE P 1A. Meet all the criteria of Benchmark™ that is designated within the document as “required,” and comply with all the relevant “acceptance criteria” listed in Appendix A of the Benchmark™.
OR
Required Alternate
EE P 1B. Demonstrate performance better than ASHRAE 90.1 2001 by a minimum of 25% in accordance with the prescriptive approach and criteria outlined in the code document.
OR
Required Alternate
EE P 1C. Demonstrate performance better than ASHRAE 90.1 2001 by a minimum of 25% in accordance with the “whole building” approach, modeling the project with an approved DOE-2 Based Software Tool
Key Protocol Provisions
Energy Efficiency, cont.Required
EE P 2. Control Air Leakage: Install a continuous air barrier and employ air sealing best practices to control air leakage
Required
EE P 3. “Rightsize” HVAC Systems: Employ best practice HVAC design techniques to improve system performance and meet ASHRAE Standard 55.
Required
EE P 4. Systems Commissioning: Commission all energy using systems.
Required
EE P 5. Operation and Maintenance Training: Provide effective and complete training and documentation on the operation and maintenance of the building systems identified in the commissioning report.
Required
EE P 6. Secure Incentives and Rebates to Reduce Cost: Participate in energy efficiency incentive and technical assistance programs that are available through applicable utility and governmental programs.
Protocol Compliance Documentation Options
Individual State Compliance Each State Maintains a Compliance Process
Final Decision on Prerequisite/Credit Mix
Prerequisite Variance Methodology
Establish Project Review Team
Regional Compliance
States and Continuing Grants Fund a Regional Review & Compliance Effort Each State May Customize Prerequisite/Credit Mix
(Limited)
Documentation Review Completed by Regional Team
Conclusions
High performance buildings/schools programs and ratepayer funded efficiency programs share many common goals
But – They do Not Share Common Methodologies or Requirements
A Regional Protocol with State-by-State Flexibility Allows Efficiency Program Administrators and School Administrators to Work Toward Common Goals