DEVELOPER (NEW CONNECTION) CHARGES CONSULTATION 24 th FEBRUARY 2017
This consultation document sets out Anglian Water’s proposals for new developer
charging arrangements as a result of the recent charging rules published by
Ofwat which are due to come into effect from April 2018.
We consider that these rules present an opportunity to make a step change in
the approach to charging, which will promote clearer and more transparent
charges.
The purpose of this document is to seek early views on our direction of travel in
preparing our new connection charges for 2018-19. Throughout the document,
we pose questions relating to our proposals which we would like particular
feedback on.
We would really appreciate your opinion and instructions on how to comment on
these proposals is outlined at the end of this document.
We are seeking feedback on our proposals by 18th April 2017.
The Water Act 2014 made changes to the Water Industry Act 1991, which
allowed Ofwat to set rules about charges for developers. This is where an owner
or occupier of a premise/building, to which the supply of water and/or water
recycling services will be provided, requires access to the existing public water
supply or water recycling system by means of a service pipe or lateral drain
and/or a new water main or public sewer.
On 29th January 2016, Defra issued charging guidance to Ofwat1.
The guidance is structured around four key objectives:
Fairness and affordability
Environmental protection
Stability and predictability
Transparency and customer focused service
Defra’s January guidance was clear in stating that:
“It is right that developers should bear the costs associated with
connections to, or adoption of, water and sewerage systems. Charges
should ensure that the distribution of costs for new infrastructure between
developers and current customers of water and sewerage companies is
fair. Cross subsidy between developers and water customers should be
limited.”
1https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/496044
/charging-guidance-ofwat-2016.pdf
Therefore, any new charging framework should retain the existing balance
between developer customers and existing bill payers. This can be achieved in a
number of ways and will be explored further in this document.
Following a consultation in July 2016, Ofwat published the final rules in
December 20162.
The Water Industry Act 1991 (WIA91) allows water companies to recover from
developers the costs to provide relevant infrastructure and connect new
developments to the water and water recycling network for domestic purposes.
These charges are intended to reflect the costs of the infrastructure needed to
make such connections.
There are different ways in which infrastructure can be provided and there are
also different charges that apply depending on how the relevant infrastructure is
provided.
The charges that are relevant to the new connections framework are as follows.
The developer pays these charges to the water company, when the water
company provides a physical connection for a premise/building, to the water
main or to a sewer. This charge is intended to cover the costs (reasonably
incurred) of the physical connection to the main or sewer. Water companies are
able to recover reasonably incurred expenses, including for the costs of ancillary
work, necessary to facilitate the connection.
The developer pays these charges to the water company when a
premise/building is first connected to a water main or to a sewer. This charge
contributes to water companies’ investment in improvements to the existing
wider distribution and sewerage networks, to meet increasing demand from new
customers. Standard domestic dwellings are charged a single rate for each
service; whereas other types of premises (for example, those subject to
common billing agreements, such as flats, or with larger than usual connection
sizes) are charged a multiple of the single rate based on the number of water
fittings in the premises.
2 http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/publication/charging-rules-for-new-connections-decision-
document/
When a developer requests the water company to provide a new water main(s)
or a public sewer(s) and certain associated infrastructure to serve a particular
locality, this is known as a ‘requisition’. The water company then builds the
infrastructure required to connect the new development to its network.
Requisition charges are intended to recover the costs reasonably incurred in
providing this infrastructure, where those costs exceed income received for the
development over 12 years. This charge can be paid annually for 12 years (the
Relevant Deficit approach) or as a lump sum: the Discounted Aggregate Deficit
(DAD) approach. This leads to the effect of the costs of the infrastructure being
recovered partially from developers and partially from existing bill payers.
Many developments and connections to individual premises will not require a
requisition and in those cases will be subject only to connection and
infrastructure charges (see above).
The self-lay option enables the developer to either build the necessary
infrastructure itself; or contract with a third party - such as a self-lay
organisation (SLO) - to build it. The developer pays the SLO the costs of building
these self-lay assets. Either the developer or the SLO pays the water company
for any additional infrastructure required (some of which only the water
company may be able to build). The water company then ‘adopts’ these assets
and, where appropriate, pays the developer an asset payment when it takes
ownership. This is discussed below.
The water company makes these payments to a developer/SLO once it has
adopted the assets owned by the developer, for example, those put in place by
an SLO as discussed under ‘self-lay charges’ above. This currently only applies to
water mains, however, the new legislation makes provision for potential asset
payments for sewerage in the future.
The following diagrams, developed with Ofwat and the wider sector, set out
types of infrastructure the charges in Section 3 relate to.
Property to new or existing water main, highlighted in grey (communication
pipe) in the diagram above.
Onsite:
New water mains within the area highlighted in green with ‘- - -‘ boundary and
the connecting pipework to the nearest water main of the same or of larger
diameter.
Offsite:
This can include water mains, reservoirs and pumping stations (new or
upgraded) that are required in consequence of growth.
Trust in water 1
New development
WATER
Stop tap and meter
installation (mainly C)
Existing strategic assets
Existing network
Connecting main
On site
Site boundary
Key
M Meter
ST Stop tap
C Contestable
NC Non-contestable
Existing road
Connection to live main (mainly NC)
Piece-ups to the live main (C)
Existing properties
New connection (C)E
xis
ting tru
nk m
ain
M
ST
M
New infill
property
M
M
Ne
w r
oa
d
ST
Pressure
management (including zonal
metering)
Service
reservoirs
Booster
pumping
stations
Water
towers
Ne
w ‘re
qu
isit
ion
ed
’ w
ate
r m
ain
(C
)
Supply pipe Communication
or service pipe
Existing ‘live’ water distribution main (non Trunk Main)
Dams and impounding reservoirs
Intake and source pumping stations
Raw water aqueducts, balancing tanks, other raw water
distribution structures and booster pumping stationsWater treatment
works and
forwarding pumping
stations
This is orange in colour on the above diagram. The costs associated with
upgrading treatment capacity cannot be charged to developer customers and are
not recovered under either the existing or proposed new connections charges
approaches.
This is reflected in the green area dotted boundary area in the diagram above -
foul or surface or both. Adoptable sewers are those included in the road
structure (sewers for adoption 6th edition) or in addition, those sewers serving
more than one property (sewers for adoption 7th edition). Adoptable sewers
include the connection to the nearest sewer of the same or larger diameter.
Onsite:
Onsite refers to sewer adoption as per the above.
Offsite:
Offsite can include costs incurred for the installation of sewers, storage tanks,
pumping stations and terminal pumping stations physically removed from the
Trust in water 2
New development
WASTEWATER
Sewage treatment
works
New shared foul water
sewer pipe (C)
Existing strategic assets
Existing network
Connecting sewer / drain
Onsite
Site boundary
Key
C Contestable
NC Non-contestable
Lateral drain
Existing road
New separate private foul
and surface water drains (C)
Existing properties
Oth
er public s
ew
ers
New
road
New private foul water drain (C)
Sea outfalls
Terminal pumping
stations
Combined
sewer
overflows
Sewage
pumping
stations
On-line and
off-line
tanks
Ne
w s
urf
ace
wa
ter
pu
bli
c s
ew
er
(eit
he
r se
lf l
ay
or
req
uis
itio
n)
New infill
property
Ne
w f
ou
l p
ub
lic s
ew
er
(eit
he
r se
lf l
ay
or
req
uis
itio
n)
New surface water drain
(C)
To local watercourse or combined sewer overflow
Existing foul water public sewerExisting surface water public sewer
sewage treatment. The costs must be incurred in the provision of capacity for
growth only.
This refers to the connection from a property to either foul sewer, surface water
sewer or both. Physical connections are normally completed by the applicants’
contractor and fees are charged for the vetting/approval/inspection.
This is orange in colour on the above diagram. The costs associated with
upgrading water recycling treatment capacity cannot be charged to developer
customers and are not recovered under either the existing or proposed new
connections charges approaches.
We are fully supportive of reform in this area and have been at the forefront of
the discussion of the desirable outcomes necessary to be delivered by the
proposed charging rules and subsequent charging scheme that companies will
develop in response. We have been central to the dialogue with Defra, Ofwat
and Water UK.
We summarise the following principles as being the desirable outcomes. These
are consistent with both the Defra and Ofwat guidance:
Equivalent charges and processes:
Facilitate fair competition between SLOs, NAVs and incumbents
Appropriately apportion and allocate costs
Fairness and affordability:
Between existing and new customers
Between water and sewerage services Between contributing developers
Stability and predictability
Incentivise water efficient homes and effective use of scarce resources
Transparent and customer focused:
Transparent (objective of reducing administrative burden)
Simple Accessible
Predictable Comprehensible
Cost reflective – reflect reasonable incurred costs
Using the principles set out by Defra and Ofwat’s charging rules, we are
proposing to reform both the structure and format of developer charges for the
areas set out above. We have sought to simplify the regime, e.g. by removing
complicated Net Present Value (NPV) calculations and predictions of the future
state of the Housing Market or inflation or interest rates used currently in DADs
calculations.
The percentages referred to in this document are based on an initial assessment
and are to be used for illustrative purposes only.
The proposal is a zonal charge, incorporating the existing infrastructure charge.
The charge will be based on a defined area, growth and offsite infrastructure
requirements, replacement of (or upsizing) of the existing water network, new or
upsized pumping stations, service reservoirs or trunk mains. The charge does
not include the costs of water treatment, abstraction or raw water transfer.
The proposal is not to recover the full costs of the offsite infrastructure, but to
retain the existing balance of contribution recovered through both infrastructure
charges and the recovery of offsite infrastructure through the existing requisition
route.
We propose to make an assessment of our water supply areas, into areas of
high, medium and low water scarcity. This will be informed by the Water
Resources Management Plan data, which forecasts water supply and demand for
25 years. There will be a different zonal charge for developments in different
zones at the varied levels of water scarcity.
There are options for the period of time that the charge will remain stable. The
longer the charge remains the same, the easier it would be to plan from land
purchase to plot completed. The downside to a longer period is the potential
imbalance between forecast and actual growth and costs.
The zonal charge will be calculated by dividing the existing contribution level of
the total cost (%), by the number of new connected properties within the
defined zone benefiting from the expenditure.
Consistent with the current charging approach, we propose to keep this as 100%
recovery of costs reasonably incurred in the completion of a new connection.
An initial assessment of the onsite contribution recovery for schemes completed
in the last three years was on average 15%. As a result, on average, 85% of the
costs of the installation of the water mains was offset by the predicted income to
be received from new customers. This retains the existing balance between
developer customers and existing bill payers.
We propose therefore, the recoverable costs should be set at a proportion to
maintain the balance of cost recovery as under the existing regime. We propose
to use a percentage based approach, informed by detailed data analysis of
recovery based on historical requisitions. We expect this to be around 15%, as
per our initial assessment. This is a percentage of reconciled reasonable costs of
installation of water mains onsite, including connection to the nearest existing
water main of the same or larger diameter.
If the water mains are completed by a self-lay organisation (SLO), in this
scenario, based on our initial assessment, we would pay 85% of the costs of
installation for works completed by the SLO, as an asset payment. This
maintains the likely ratio of 15:85 between developer and new customers’ bills.
The proposal is a zonal charge, as an addition to the existing infrastructure
charge. This charge will be based on a defined area, growth and offsite
infrastructure requirements, replacement of (or upsizing) of the existing
sewerage network, new or upsized pumping stations, storage tanks and rising
mains. The charge does not include the costs of sewage treatment or terminal
pumping stations located at water recycling centres.
The proposal is not to recover the full costs of the offsite infrastructure, but to
retain the existing balance of contribution recovered through both infrastructure
charges and the recovery of offsite infrastructure through the existing requisition
route. The same ratio is to be used once finalised, likely 15:85, for the costs of
installation of the sewerage infrastructure to enable growth.
The public sewerage network owned by Anglian Water expanded significantly as
a result of the 2011 private sewer transfer. The connectivity and exact location
of all assets is being captured. Therefore, we propose to have a single ‘zone’ for
sewerage, which will be further defined after 2020 (AMP7). We propose to
provide benefit to customers who build water efficient homes by reducing the
sewerage zonal charge in line with the water approach. This is reflected in the
diagram above where there are levels of water efficiency discounts.
It is our proposal to retain the existing regime for sewer connections (s106) and
sewer adoptions for onsite sewers.
We welcome your responses to this document. Please get in touch with us before
18th April 2017.
You can email your responses to [email protected]
Alternatively you can also submit your response by post to:
We will discuss these proposals at our charging engagement event on 2nd March
and would welcome feedback during this time also.