Peter Hooper Chief Economist Deutsche Bank Securities Presentation to UCSD Economics Roundtable April 22, 2008 Digesting the Credit Crunch Home Prices Are Key DISCLAIMER AND ANALYST CERTIFICATION ARE LOCATED ON THE LAST PAGE
Jan 19, 2015
Peter HooperChief Economist
Deutsche Bank Securities
Presentation to UCSD Economics RoundtableApril 22, 2008
Digesting the Credit Crunch Home Prices Are Key
DISCLAIMER AND ANALYST CERTIFICATION ARE LOCATED ON THE LAST PAGE
2
Key Issues
Central Scenario: Mild Recession, sluggish recovery
Risks: Deep/prolonged recession vs. inflation.
Critical Recession Risk factor: Home prices (HP).HP Drivers: and why they point to mild RecessionHP Effects: Credit crunch and Wealth Loss
What the Fed has done, and what more might be done.
Inflation risk.
Conclusions
3
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008
Index
40
60
80
100
120
140
160Index
Source: University of Michigan, Conference Board, DB Global Markets Research
Consumer sentiment in mild recession territory
U. Michigan consumer sentiment
Conference board’s consumer confidence
4
-10
-5
0
5
10
Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Jan-08 Mar-08
3M %chg, AR
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
3M %chg, AR
Source: BEA, Autodata Corporation, DB Global Markets Research
Key components of consumer spending have been slowing
Core retail sales (ls)
Light vehicle sales (rs)
5
-15.0
-7.5
0.0
7.5
15.0
22.5
2005 2006 2007 2008
3M %chg, AR
-15.0
-7.5
0.0
7.5
15.0
22.5QoQ %chg, AR
Source: BEA, Census, DB Global Markets Research
Business spending softening too
Capital goods orders (ls)
Real private nonresidential investment (rs)
6
Labor market pointing to recession
Source: BLS, DB Global Markets Research
2
4
6
8
10
12
1948 1954 1960 1966 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008
%
2
4
6
8
10
12
%
Unemployment rate
77
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q/Q%, AR
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q/Q%, ARConsumer spending (PCE) Nonres investmentRes investment Change in inventoriesNet exports Government
Forecast
Real GDP growthTrend
2003-06 average
Q1 Q2 Q3Q3Q4
Q4 Q4
2007 2008 2009
Mild Recession Scenario
Spending contributions
Source: BEA, DB Global Markets Research
Real GDP Q4/Q4
2007 2.8
2008 0.8
2009 2.3
8
Spending components of GDP in 2007
Net exports, -5%
Government spending, 19%
Business fixed investment,
11%
Residential investment,
5%
Consumer spending, 70%
Change in inventories,
0.00%
Key Components of GDP
Source: BEA, DB Global Markets Research
9
Risk of deeper/more prolonged recession:
Critical factor is how far and how fast home prices fall
Fall in housing equity affects aggregate demand through:
Drop in household wealth depressing consumer spending.Credit crunch: Loss on foreclosures, decline in MBS values, de-leveraging, credit cutbacks.
10
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010
1991-2003=1.0
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Renormalization of home price/rent ratios points to substantial drop in home prices
Source: Census, DB Global Markets Research
Home price/rent ratios*
*Uses Owners’ equivalent rent from CPI
Case-Shiller, composite 10
OFHEO Purchaseonly price
11
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010
1991-2003=1.0
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Case-Shiller futures not anticipating full renormalization
Source: Census, DB Global Markets Research
Home price/rent ratios
*Also in line with longer-term trend for Case Shiller price/OER rent ratio.
OFHEO Purchase
C-Sfutures
Case-Shiller, composite 10
1991-2003 average*
12
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010
1991-2003=1.0
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Conventional home price indexes may overstate the problem—price run-up reflected improving quality
Source: Census, DB Global Markets Research
Home price/rent ratios*
*Uses Owners’ equivalent rent from CPI
OFHEO PurchaseConstant QualityNew Home Price
C-Sfutures
Case-Shiller, composite 10
13
Factors Driving Home Prices Lower
1.Underlying supply and demand fundamentals:Excess stock of housing = total no. of housing units minus no. of households Change in excess housing stock = housing completions – (household formations + demolitions (removals))
2. Shift in demand from owner-occupied to rental units, due to:Rising foreclosure rate.But increase in home affordability is beginning to shift demand back from rental to owner-occupied, a plus for prices.
1414
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008
Ratio
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
yoy%
Stock of vacant homes inversely correlated with HPA
Source: Census, Realtor, DB Global Markets Research
Real conventional mortgage price inflation (rs)
Vacant houses for sale: months supply (ls)
Correl. = -0.70
15
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Thousands
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000Thousands
Excess Housing Stock now at about 900k units
Source: Census, DB Global Markets Research
Vacant homes*
Trend calculated from 1965 to 2003
* Includes homes for sale, homes for rent, and homes held off the market; excludes seasonal homes and second homes not used a primary residence.
16
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Thousands Thousands
Growth of housing stock has now fallen below long-run average growth in demand
Source: Census,NAR, DB Global Markets Research
Housing permits
Home completions
Trend growth in demand
17
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Thousands Thousands
“Demand” fluctuates around trend; returns to trend implies runoff of excess stock could exceed 500k AR.
Source: Census,NAR, DB Global Markets Research
Housing permits
New home completions
“Demand” (household formations + removals
Household formations
18
Percent of US residential mortgages
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007
%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
%
Source: MBA, DB Global Markets Research
Shift from owner-occupied to rental units: Foreclosures are soaring and depressing prices
Homes in foreclosure
Foreclosures started (per qtr)
19
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Index
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200Index
Source: UM ICH, NAR, DB Global Markets Research
Strong bounce-back in housing “affordability” will help
Mich Survey: home buying conditions (rs)
Housing affordability (ls)
2020
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
1402001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Index
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
Index, 2002=100
Affordability has improved as home prices have declined relative to income.
Source: REALTOR, BEA, DB Global Markets Research
Existing home sales price/ income ratio (rs)
Housing affordability index (inverted, ls)
21
Home price/rent ratios*
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 20100.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
1991-2003=1.0
Case-Shiller
OFHEO Purchase price C-S
futures
Quality-adjusted price index
Median sales price for existing single family
homes
Affordability index uses median existing home sales price
Source: OFHEO, NAR, BLS, Census, DB Global Markets Research
*Uses Owners’ equivalent rent from CPI
2222
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Thousands
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
Thousands
Source: Realtor, Census, DB Global Markets Research
Home sales may be starting to respond to improvement in affordability
Total home sales
23
How lower home prices impact the economy
Wealth Effect: effect of declining housing wealth on consumer spending
Credit crunch Effect: effect of declining housing asset values on mortgage-related financial losses; implications for cost of credit as de-leveraging occurrs.
24
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004
%
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5ratio
Source: BEA, FRB, DB Global Markets Research
Household saving rate should rise as wealth/income ratio recedes
Personal saving rate (ls)
Wealth-to-income ratio (rs)
Stock -25%, House prices -15% from peaks
25
The Credit Crunch
26
Interbank risk spreads have remained wide despite Fed rate cuts
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
Apr-07 Jun-07 Aug-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 Feb-08 Apr-08
%
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
%
Source: Bloomberg, Haver, FRB, DB Global Markets Research
3 month LIBOR
3 month USD swap OIS
Fed funds target
27
Private long-term rates rising, or declining only slowly
Source: Bloomberg, Haver, FRB, DB Global Markets Research
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Jan-08 Mar-08
%
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12%Home equity loans
US home mrtgage 30 yr Jumbo national avgUS conventional 30 yr mortgage
High grade corp.
High yield corp.
28
Corporate funding costs up sharply
14010
220
180
175
340
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
50-year average 2006-07 average Latest week
Credit spread (Baa Corp - 10yr Treas)
Yield curve (10yr Treas - 3mo T-bill)bp
Source: FRB, Bloomberg, DB Global Markets Research
320
185
560
29
Securitized mortgage lending has disappeared
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20071Q
20072Q
20073Q
20074Q
2008(Jan &Feb)
$ bn, AR
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900Alt-A Subprime Jumbo
$ bn, AR
Source: MBA, DB Global Markets Research
30
But bank credit conditions for households are tightening
Source: Federal Reserve Senior Loan Officer Survey, DB Global Markets Research
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
%
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
%
Mortgages (ls)
Consumer Loans (ls)
Credit Cards (ls)
Banks' willingness to make consumerloans (inverted, rs)
Fed Survey: banks tightening lending standards
31
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
1966 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008
%
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03d log
Source: FRB, DB Global Markets Research
Residuals show relationship to banks willingness to extend consumer credit around recessions
Estimated coef on BW is signif and indicates that -10 on BW reduces PCE growth by 0.4% pt.
Banks’ willingness to make consumer installment credit loans (ls)
Residuals (rs)
32
Summing up Downside Risks
For every 10% additional drop in home prices:
– Household wealth falls by $2 trn
– Consumer spending is reduced by 1% via wealth effects
– Financial sector losses on foreclosures increase by $50-100bn
– Tightening of credit conditions associated with de-leveraging could reduce GDP by an additional 1/4-1/2%
There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the magnitude of these wealth and credit effects.
33
0
2
4
6
8
10
1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008
%
0
2
4
6
8
10
%
* FFnom = 2.5 - 2*(UR - NAIRU) + 0.5*(Core PCE inflation - 1.75) + Core PCE inflation
Source: FRB, BEA, CBO, DB Global Markets Research
Fed has cut unusually aggressively in response to downside risks
Taylor rule specification with employment gap*
Actual Fed funds rate
34
US Policy Actions to Address Housing and Credit CrunchFed rate cuts: 300 bps.
Liquidity enhancements:Fed Discount Window penalty cut 75bps, term increased to 90 daysTAF 28-day credit to banks, broad (DW) collateral, auction det. rate TSLF 28-day credit to primary dealers, AAA-rated collateral, auction det. ratePDCF Overnight loan facility for primary dealers BBB or better collateral, DW rateLarge scale FHLB advances to banks, favorable rates, broad collateral.Fed $29bn rescue package for Bear StearnsSwap arrangement with ECB and other central banks.
Measures to bolster mortgage market.Agency loan limits raised to reflect diff. median home price levels across regionsAgency capital limits increased and requirements relaxed, allowing $400bn more Agency purchases.FHLB purchases of Agency MBS doubled ($100+ bn)
Fiscal stimulus package: $168bn tax rebates to households, credits to firms.
Possible further measures.Fed purchases of Agency MBS.Mortgage write-down proposals.Government purchases of private mortgages and MBS..
35
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1996 1998 2000 2003 2005 2008
yoy%
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0yoy%
Source: BEA,DB Global Markets Research
Inflation: Headline running well above comfort zone
Fed’sComfortzone
Consumer prices (PCE)
Core (ex food and energy)Headline
36
-80
-40
0
40
80
120
160
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
yoy %
-80
-40
0
40
80
120
160
yoy %Crude oil priceCPI: energyPPI: energy goods
Surge in oil prices still poses inflation risk
Source: BLS, WSJ, DB Global Markets Research
37Source: BLS, CRB, DB Global Markets Research
Food prices still look troublesome too
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
yoy%
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
yoy%CPI: foodCRB Commodity price index: FoodCore CPIPPI: Intermediate foods and feeds
38
Falling dollar means more import price inflation
Source: BLS,FRB, DB Global Markets Research
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
yoy%
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0yoy%
Import price index: excl. fuels (rs)
Nominal broad trade-weighted exchange value of US$ (ls)
39
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08
%
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
%
Longer term inflation expectations moving upward
Source: U.Mich,Bloomberg,Phil Fed, DB Global Markets Research
Philly Fed (SPF) PCE inflation expectations
Philly Fed (SPF) CPI inflation expectations
5Y5Y breakeven inflation expectations UMich 5-10 year
inflation expectations
40
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1970 1980 1990 20003
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11% %
Source: BLS,CBO,DB Global Markets Research
Labor market easing
Estimated NAIRU range
Unemployment rate
Mild Recession
41
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008
%
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
%
Unit labor cost inflation receding
Source: BLS, DB Global Markets Research
Unit labor cost (4q % change)
Core PCE price index
42
Conclusions
US economy likely in mild recession.
Housing overhang should begin to drop significantly in next several quarters.
This should limit further drop in home prices, and along with monetary and fiscal stimulus, help keep recession mild.
Risks to this view are weighted more to the downside than the upside, given ongoing credit crunch.
Inflation risks still present, but receding as growth slows andlabor market softens.
Fed likely to cut rates moderately further.
Expect a relatively sluggish recovery through 2009.
43
Peter HooperManaging Director, Chief Economist
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
Peter Hooper oversees a team of economists that analyze and forecast developments in the US economy and financial markets. Dr. Hooper joined Deutsche Bank Securities in the fall of 1999 as Chief US Economist, and was appointed Chief Economist in 2006. Dr. Hooper frequently comments on US economic and financial developments in the news media.
Prior to joining the firm, Dr. Hooper enjoyed a distinguished 26-year career at the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, D.C. He held numerous positions at the Fed, including as an economist on the FOMC and as Deputy Director of the Division of International Finance. In doing so, he developed an informed view of the Fed's policy making process.
Dr. Hooper earned a BA in Economics (cum laude) from Princeton University and an MA and Ph.D. in Economics from University of Michigan. He has published numerous books, journal articles, and reviews on economics and policy analysis.
44
The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Deutsche Bank AG or one of its affiliates (collectively “Deutsche Bank”). The information herein is believed by Deutsche Bank to be reliable and has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable. With the exception of information about Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Bank makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.
This published research report may be considered by Deutsche Bank when Deutsche Bank is deciding to buy or sell proprietary positions in the securities mentioned in this report.
For select companies, Deutsche Bank equity research analysts may identify shorter-term opportunities that are consistent or inconsistent with Deutsche Bank's existing, longer-term Buy or Sell recommendations. This information is made available on the SOLAR stock list, which can be found at http://gm.db.com.
Deutsche Bank may trade for its own account as a result of the short term trading suggestions of analysts and may also engage in securities transactions in a manner inconsistent with this research report and with respect to securities covered by this report, will sell to or buy from customers on a principal basis. Disclosures of conflicts of interest, if any, are discussed at the end of the text of this report or on the Deutsche Bank website at http://gm.db.com.
Opinions, estimates and projections in this report constitute the current judgement of the author as of the date of this report. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Deutsche Bank and are subject to change without notice. Deutsche Bank has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate, except if research on the subject company is withdrawn. Prices and availability of financial instruments also are subject to change without notice. This report is provided for informational purposes only. It is not to be construed as an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any financial instruments or to participate in any particular trading strategy in any jurisdiction or as an advertisement of any financial instruments.
The financial instruments discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors and investors must make their own investment decisions using their own independent advisors as they believe necessary and based upon their specific financial situations and investment objectives. If a financial instrument is denominated in a currency other than an investor’s currency, a change in exchange rates may adversely affect the price or value of, or the income derived from, the financial instrument, and such investor effectively assumes currency risk. In addition, income from an investment may fluctuate and the price or value of financial instruments described in this report, either directly or indirectly, may rise or fall. Furthermore, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Unless governing law provides otherwise, all transactions should be executed through the Deutsche Bank entity in the investor’s home jurisdiction . In the U.S. this report is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., a member of the NYSE, the NASD, NFA and SIPC. In Germany this report is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG Frankfurt authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. In the United Kingdom this report is approved and/or communicated by Deutsche Bank AG London, a member of the London Stock Exchange and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of investment business in the UK and authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin). This report is distributed in Hong Kong by Deutsche Bank AG, Hong Kong Branch, in Korea by Deutsche Securities Korea Co. and in Singapore by Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch. In Japan this report is approved and/or distributed by Deutsche Securities Inc. The information contained in this report does not constitute the provision of investment advice. In Australia, retail clients should obtain a copy of a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) relating to any financial product referred to in this report and consider the PDS before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. Deutsche Bank AG Johannesburg is incorporated in the Federal Republic of Germany (Branch Register Number in South Africa: 1998/003298/10) Additional information relative to securities, other financial products or issuers discussed in this report is available upon request. This report may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose without Deutsche Bank's prior written consent. Please cite source when quoting.
Copyright © 2006 Deutsche Bank AG
Analyst CertificationThe views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the undersigned lead analyst(s). In addition, the undersigned lead analyst(s) has not and will not receive any compensation for providing a specific recommendation or view in this report. Peter Hooper