Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017 Determining a Cost-Effective Technique for Electrification of Remote Houses Using Different Renewable and Gas-based Sources School of Engineering and Information Technology ENG 470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017 Majoring in Renewable Energy Engineering and Instrumentation and Control Engineering Author: Muhammad IsminHilmy Ismail Academic Supervisor: Farhad Shahnia Unit Coordinator: Dr Gareth Lee and Prof Parisa Arabzadeh Bahri
47
Embed
Determining a Cost-Effective Technique for Electrification of … · 2016). Houses that are connected to the South-West Interconnected System (SWIS) would see expansion in their power
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
Determining a Cost-Effective
Technique for Electrification of
Remote Houses Using Different
Renewable and Gas-based Sources
School of Engineering and Information Technology
ENG 470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
Majoring in Renewable Energy Engineering and
Instrumentation and Control Engineering
Author: Muhammad IsminHilmy Ismail
Academic Supervisor: Farhad Shahnia
Unit Coordinator: Dr Gareth Lee and Prof Parisa Arabzadeh Bahri
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
i | P a g e
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my appreciation to those who provided me with the possibility
to complete this report. A gratitude I give to my supervisor, Dr Farhad Shahnia, whose
contributing motivating ideas and encouragement, helps me to complete my thesis project
especially in writing this report.
Special thanks to the staff member of Murdoch University for assisting me and firmly guide me
in completing this project. Without their help and organization, this thesis would not be
finished.
Last but not least, I would like to show gratitude to my family and my friends for continuously
supporting me to complete this thesis.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
ii | P a g e
ABSTRACT
This project is concerned with determining the cost-effective technique for
electrification of remote houses using different renewable energy and gas-based sources.
Cases with inclusion and exclusion of some of the power sources are given with the idea of
which cases defined as the most profitable and worthwhile. The power sources included in this
thesis project are the electricity grid, the PV panel, the battery storage and the gas generator.
Therefore, the cost visibility of each of these cases are also different and it is an important
view as it decides the outcomes of the project. The cases given were modelled in the HOMER
pro software. Initially, feasibility studies and literature review were carried out in order to
acquire knowledge of the power sources used in the project as well as familiarizing with the
HOMER tools. In familiarizing with the tools, the components used in HOMER tools were
examined and studied as it sometimes creates problems such as limited library data. This
method helped develops a strong basic information about the project and gives a broad view
of the project. The HOMER software is used to experience the simulation, the optimization and
the sensitivity analysis of the cases given. By using the HOMER tools, the total net present cost
can be obtained. Through the data obtained, analysis of the project also can be presented.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
iii | P a g e
Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... ii
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................iv
LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................ v
LIST OF SYMBOLS .......................................................................................................................... v
The capital cost of Gas Generator + Fuel Usage ($/m3)
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
23 | P a g e
4. METHODOLOGY
All of the cases are modelled in the HOMER pro software.
4.1 EQUIPMENT MODELED IN HOMER
4.1.1 Load Profile of Study Area
An average Australian house uses 18 kWh per day and 6,570 kWh per year (Electricians
2017). Therefore, I used 18 kWh as the scaled annual average (kWh/d) for a residential
household. The electric loads for each case would be the same. The monthly load profile is
shown in Figure 12. The energy load demand in the morning is low, however, at night, the load
demand is approximately high as compared to in the morning and from 12:00 pm until 5:00
pm (Singh, Baredar, and Gupta 2015).
Figure 12: The Monthly load profile in the study area
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
24 | P a g e
4.1.2 Resource of Study Area
The solar Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data for the designated area of study is
attained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Surface Meteorology
and Solar Energy website. The solar GHI is essential in modelling the cases because the data is
used by PV panel in simulating all of the cases plus the data is accurately defined by the
location of the area of study. Figure 13 shows the solar GHI of the selected area of study. The
annual average of the solar GHI is 5.51 (kWh/𝑚3/day).
Figure 13: Monthly Global Horizontal Irradiance data of the study area
The temperature data of the selected area is also obtained from the NASA Surface
Meteorology and Solar Energy website. The presence of PV panels requires the data of the
temperature of the study area. The average temperature data for the study area is 17.85 (˚C).
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
25 | P a g e
Figure 14: Monthly average temperature data of the study area
4.1.3 Grid
In this project, the electricity grid is used in every case but not in Case 5. The power
rates that would be chosen for this project is the simple rates. Consumer pays the same
price for any usage of electricity at any time. The grid power price ($/kWh) is 0.241 while
the grid sell back price ($/kWh) is 0.741.
4.1.4 Photovoltaic (PV)
The PV panel that is used in the project is Winaico 260W Polycrystalline. In this project,
a 6kW of PV capacity is used which means that 23 number of panels will be combined together
in order to get a 6 kW capacity of PV system. The capital cost is $ 7,000 and the replacement
cost is $5,800 for this PV panel. For the maintenance and operation cost, the price would be $
30 per year as the maintenance including the connections, cables, panels, rooftop mounting
and DC isolator switches (Brakels 2017). The PV panel is shown in Figure 15 (Australia 2016).
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
26 | P a g e
Figure 15: Winaico 260W Polycrystalline Solar Panel
4.1.5 Solar Inverter
The solar inverter is a vital device that works together with the PV panels. The purpose
of a solar inverter is to convert the DC electricity that comes from the PV panel into AC
electricity so that it can use in supplying the load demand. This string inverter is a single phase.
The SMA Sunny Boy with a capacity of 5 kW is used for the solar inverter and the capital cost
for it is $ 3,900. The maintenance cost and the maintenance and operation cost is $ 2,000 and
$ 20 per year respectively. Figure 16 shows the solar inverter by SMA Sunny Boy
(webosolar.com 2017).
Figure 16: SMA Sunny Boy SB5.0
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
27 | P a g e
4.1.6 Battery Bank
The battery bank is installed because of its ability to store the surplus electricity produced by
the PV panels. It discharges power when PV do not create power anymore. LG Chem RESU6.5
is the battery storage that will be used in this project with a capacity of 6.5 kW. The capital
price is $ 8,000 and the replacement price is $ 6,600. This battery storage does not need
maintenance hence the cost of maintenance is zero. The battery is as shown in Figure 17
(Brakels 2016).
Figure 17: LG CHEM RESU6.5
4.1.7 Hybrid Inverter
The hybrid inverter is inserted in Case 4 due to having both PV panels and battery bank
respectively. It can change the DC electricity created by the PV panels into AC electricity and
also can convert the DC charge of the battery into AC charge as well in order to powers the
households. The Solax X3 Hybrid is a 3 phase hybrid inverter that will be introduced in this
project as shown in Figure 18 below (Electric 2017) . The capacity for the Solax X3 Hybrid is
5kW and the capital cost for it is $ 9,500. The replacement cost is $ 5,500 and it does not need
maintenance. It is chosen because it is compatible with LG Chem battery.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
28 | P a g e
Figure 18: Solax X3 Hybrid
4.1.8 Gas Generator
The standby gas generator is used in Case 4 and Case 5. It uses natural gas as it fuels
source. This 3 phase Cummins gas generator has an initial capital cost of $ 12,000 and the
replacement cost is $ 10,000. It requires 3 cents per hour of operation and maintenance. The
fuel price is 4.7 ($/𝑚3) (Energy 2017a). This standby gas generator contains a capacity of
30kW. Figure 19 show the Cummins 30kW RX30 Standby Power Generator (Generator 2017).
Figure 19: Cummins 30kW RX30 Standby Power Generator
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
29 | P a g e
4.2 DESIGNATED SYSTEM MODEL IN HOMER
All of the cases are simulated in the HOMER pro software in which way they are
designated. This software is used in determining the cost-effective technique for electrification
of remote houses by using different renewable and gas-based sources. The power sources
involve power grid, PV panel, battery bank and gas generator. The following shows the
schematic diagram of all of the five cases modelled in the HOMER pro software. The figures
contain the components that are in the cases and it also displayed with the AC and DC buses as
well.
CASE 1
Figure 20 shows the schematic diagram of Case 1. It shows that the electricity grid power
the study area by using AC electricity to withstand the electric load of 18kWh.
Figure 20: Schematic Diagram of Case 1
Case 2
In this case, the sources to generate energy are from the power grid and the PV array. As shown in
Figure 21, the grid gives AC electricity straight away to supply the households. After
that, the PV array provides DC electricity; consequently, the solar inverter is needed in
converting the electricity from DC to AC in order to powers the home.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
30 | P a g e
Figure 21: Schematic Diagram of Case 2
Case 3
Case 3 is where the battery bank is installed with the previous system. The AC bus is
occupied only with the electricity grid. Though, the DC bus is filled with the PV array and
the battery bank as shown in Figure 22. The hybrid inverter is used in this case in
transforming the electricity of AC to DC and vice versa. The purpose of using the hybrid
inverter rather than a solar inverter and battery inverter by itself so that it can convert the
DC electricity into AC electricity from the PV array to supply the energy to the house and it
converts AC electricity to DC electricity so that it can charge the battery bank as one unit
only. The battery bank also can discharge itself with the assist of the inverter. Given these
points, the hybrid inverter has the ability of the combination of the solar and battery
inverter.
Figure 22: Schematic Diagram of Case 3
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
31 | P a g e
Case 4
The differences between Case 3 and Case 4 is, in Case 4, the gas generator is inserted.
Now, the AC bus is filled with the gas generator and the power grid. The DC bus remains
the same as in Case 3. To summarize, this case uses most electricity sources which are the
grid, the gas generator, the PV array and the battery storage. This is shown in Figure 23.
The gas generator operated only on weekends in the simulation.
Figure 23: Schematic Diagram of Case 4
Case 5
In Case 5, the households received powers only from the gas generator. This can be seen in
Figure 24. The gas generator has to withstand the load demand of 18kWh per day by itself.
Therefore, the gas generator is scheduled to operate at all time.
Figure 24: Schematic Diagram of Case 5
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
32 | P a g e
4.3 HOMER: SIMULATION
In the simulation process, HOMER will undergo an energy balance calculation which will
be based on the system configuration containing numbers of components depends on the
cases as shown in the section above. In this project, the considered components are electricity
grid, PV array, battery storage and gas generator. Then after the simulation, it decides the
ideal system configuration. The simulation of the designed model on the study area based on
the approximation of the capital cost, replacement cost, operation and maintenance cost, and
fuel rate (Kumar et al. 2016). There are also grid power price and grid sell-back price.
4.4 HOMER OPTIMIZATION
After done simulating the designed model based on cases, the ideal solution is
attained. The optimization results containing a list of the ideal solution in an organized form
considering Total Net Present Cost (TNPC). HOMER software sorted the NPC from the highest
to the lowest. Then again, the designed model based on TNPC is altered subject to the
sensitivity variable that has been selected by the user (Kumar et al. 2016).
The total net present cost (TNPC) of a system is the present value of all the cost the
system experience over its lifetime, minus the present value of all of the revenues that the
system earns over its lifetime. The cost comprises capital cost, replacement costs, operation
and maintenance cost. This also included the cost of buying and selling power from and to the
grid respectively. The recovered value and grid sales revenue are the revenues components
(ENERGY 2017b).
The TNPC is the main output of the HOMER software as it decides which case is the
best in term of cost and reliability in the optimization results. From the results, HOMER
calculates the total annualized cost and the levelised cost of energy (ENERGY 2017b).
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
33 | P a g e
4.5 HOMER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The sensitivity analysis of the HOMER software compromises the ideal result for every system
modelled. In this procedure, it will repeat the iterations for all sensitivity variable included in
this project. A list of an ideal solution of the designed model is shown with sorted form the
lowest TNPC to the highest. Therefore, the system with the lowest TNPC is the ideal case.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
34 | P a g e
5. RESULT AND ANALYSIS
The data obtained from the optimization result from the HOMER software after
running the simulation are analysed. The TNPC of each case is recorded. Therefore, in this
project, the cost visibility of all cases are being examined in achieving the project objectives.
5.1 COST VISIBILITY OF MODELLED CASES FOR 25 YEARS
The cost visibility of modelled cases is simulated for 25 years and the data is recorded.
In this data, the capital cost, the replacement cost and operation and maintenance cost are
included. The buying and selling grid power are also included in the data. In
, as shown below, it shows the electrical cost of modelled cases for 25 years including
the capital cost.
Table 2: The Total Net Present Cost for the designed cases for 25 years
Type of Cases Total Net Present Cost ($)
Case 1 24,942
Case 2 -57,630
Case 3 -45,910.00
Case 4 160.91
Case 5 3,630,000.00
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
35 | P a g e
Figure 25: the Electrical cost of modelled cases for 25 years
Based on Figure 25, it can be observed that in Case 1, the cost is $ 24,942 which is a
moderate value considering the household only using the power from the grid. On the other
hand, in Case 2 and Case 3, the electrical cost is minus $ 57,630 and minus $ 45,910
respectively. It shows the minus sign due to the presence of PV array. The surplus energy
generated by the PV panels are being sold back to the power grid in reducing the electricity
bill. In specific, the bill for Case 2 and Case 3 contained a lot of credit in such a way the value of
the households need to pay is negative. However, Case 4 rose considerably more than Case 1,
Case 2 and Case 3 which is $ 160.91. This is due to the high fee of capital cost, replacement
cost, operation and maintenance cost of the generator. Moreover, the natural gas fee is also
mainly influenced the bill for Case 4. Lastly, the TNPC for Case 5 grows sharply for the value of
3.63 million. This case generates the highest value because it uses an only gas generator in
supplying the load demand of 18kWh per day.
24,942 -57,630 -45,910.00 160.91
3,630,000.00
-500,000
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
1 2 3 4 5
Tota
l Net
Pre
sen
t C
ost
($
)
Type of Cases
Cost visibility of modelled cases for 25 years including the capital cost
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
36 | P a g e
5.2 COST VISIBILITY OF MODELLED CASES FOR 1 YEAR
All of the designed cases are simulated for a year in the HOMER software and the
capital cost are excluded from the simulation. In contrast, the power grid buying and selling
fees are the only bills contained in this study. Table 3 shows the cost visibility of the designed
cases for a year with eliminating the capital cost.
Table 3: The Total Net Present Cost of modelled cases for a year
Type of Cases Total Net Present Cost ($)
Case 1 1,583
Case 2 -4,133
Case 3 -5,079.00
Case 4 15,572.00
Case 5 221,011.00
Figure 26: Annual electrical cost of modelled cases
1,583 -4,133 -5,079.0015,572.00
221,011.00
-50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1 2 3 4 5
Tota
l Net
Pre
sen
t C
ost
($
)
Type of Cases
Cost visibility of modelled cases over a year excluding the capital cost
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
37 | P a g e
Based on Figure 26, Case 1 shows a steady value of $ 1,583 of the electric bill. This is
because it uses the power from the grid only. While in Case 2, the cost for using the electricity
is minus $ 4,133 since the extra energy created by the PV array is exported back to the grid.
The negative value shows that the household uses most of the energy created by the PV rather
the grid. Case 3 shows a steady increase in numbers from Case 2 which is minus $ 5,079. Case
3 gives highest credit compare to Case 2 because of the existence of the battery bank.
Therefore, lesser power from the grid is used. Then, Case 4 shows a significant increase with
the value of $ 15,572 and Case 5 represent the top bill in this analysis with the value of $
221,011 as it operates every day for a year with the price of 4.70 ($/𝑚3) for natural gas.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
38 | P a g e
6. CONCLUSION
Based on the result and analysis that have been carried out, the most ideal case that
has been simulated in the HOMER pro software to achieve the main objective is Case 3. Case 3
proves to be the most cost-effective model due to its ability in generating the least TNPC
compare to other cases. The electricity sources installed in this case are electricity grid, PV
array and battery storage. The capability of PV in creating huge excess power so that it would
be able to recharge the battery bank as well as selling back the energy to the electricity grid.
Other than that, this thesis project mainly uses HOMER pro software by HOMER
ENERGY as the medium in modelling the cases. Throughout the thesis, this software has been
used to simulate all of the cases provided and at the same time provide the best method in
determining the cost-effectiveness for electrification of remote houses by using several
renewable and gas-based sources.
Then, by reducing the installation cost, the anticipated cases to be decided as the
worthwhile and profitable are Case 4 and Case 5 as it contains gas generator in both cases.
However, the natural gas price is expensive and the gas generator selection that uses natural
gas as its fuel with a low capacity in the HOMER software is limited. Therefore, Case 3 still
considered as the ideal cases due to the least bill consumed by the simulation carried out.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
39 | P a g e
7. FUTURE RECOMMENDATION
As can be seen, there are several recommendations that can be considered in the
future if this thesis wishes to be improved. The components that are listed in the HOMER pro
software are varied and a lot of options to choose. Nevertheless, the library for each of the
components are not up-to-date and most of the components are not available in this country.
Then, the desired components are usually not on the library list because of the limited
manufacturer and capacity range. Therefore, it is difficult to carry a feasibility study due to its
components are mostly comes from the original creator of the software which is the USA.
Other than that, in trying to determine which cases are profitable, the standby gas
generator should be installed with diesel as its fuel. This is because the price of diesel is much
cheaper compared to natural gas’s price.
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
40 | P a g e
8. REFERENCE
Australia, Energy. 2017. What is a tariff? 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.energyaustralia.com.au/home/electricity-and-gas/understand-electricity-and-gas-plans/what-tariff.
Australia, Off-Grid Energy. 2017. Grid Connected Battery Storage 2015 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.offgridenergy.com.au/grid-battery-systems/.
Australia, Solar Online. 2016. 260W WINAICO WST-260P6 Polycrystalline Solar Panel. Brakels, Ronald. 2017. New LG Chem RESU Batteries: Smaller, More Powerful And Cheaper
Than A Powerwall 2016 [cited 2 November 2017]. Available from https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/new-lg-chem-resu-batteries-smaller-powerful-cheaper-powerwall/.
Brakels, Ronald. 2017. Solar Panel Maintenance: How often should they be inspected? Solar Quotes 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/solar-panel-maintenance-often-inspected/.
Commision, Australian Energy Market. 2016. 2016 Residential Electricity Price Trends. edited by Australian Energy Market Commision. Sydney.
Daware, Kiran. 2017. AC Generator (Alternator) - Construction And Working. Electrical Easy 2014/2016a [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.electricaleasy.com/2014/02/AC-generator-alternator-construction-working.html.
Daware, Kiran. 2017. Electrical Power Grid - Structure And Working. Electrical Easy 2014/2016b [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.electricaleasy.com/2016/01/electrical-power-grid-structure-working.html.
Daware, Kiran. 2017. Solar Power System - How Does It Work? electricaleasy 2014/2016c [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.electricaleasy.com/2015/12/solar-power-system-how-does-it-work.html.
Easy, Energy Made. 2017. Understanding gas and electricity charges, 2 August 2017 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.energymadeeasy.gov.au/get-energy-smart/energy-bills/understanding-gas-and-electricity-charges.
Electric, Eco. 2017. SolaX X3 Hybrid | 5kW 3 Phase Inverter. Electricians, Platinum. 2017. How Much Power is Needed to Run an Average Home? 2017
[cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.platinumelectricians.com.au/blog/power-needed-run-average-home/.
Energy, Alinta. 2017. What are the tariffs from 01 July 2017? 2017a [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.alintaenergy.com.au/wa/natural-gas/natural-gas-pricing-fees/changes-to-alinta-energy-prices.
ENERGY, HOMER. 2017b. Total Net Present Cost, Homer Pro 3.10: Homer Energy. Energy, Origin. 2017. WHAT IS A FEED-IN TARIFF (FIT)? 2017c [cited 3 November 2017].
Available from https://www.originenergy.com.au/for-home/solar/why-solar/feed-in-tariffs.html.
Farrell, Brittany. 2017. Can Hawaiian Electric convince customers to invest in solar and battery storage without pushing them off the grid? Clean Power Research 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.cleanpower.com/2017/hawaiian-electric-solar-storage/.
Generator, Electric. 2017. Cummins RX30 Power Connect™ Series 30kW Standby Power Generator (120/208V 3-Phase).
Muhammad Ismail ENG470: Engineering Honours Thesis 2017
41 | P a g e
Iggulden, Tom. 2017. Power prices up 63 per cents since 2007, ACCC report shows, as watchdog casts doubt on Clean Energy Target 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-16/clean-energy-target-not-certain-to-lower-power-prices-accc/9052094.
Inc, DirectPower Generators. 2017. How a Home Standby Generator Works 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.directpower.ca/How/.
Mozo. 2017. Home battery storage 2018/2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://mozo.com.au/energy/guides/home-battery-storage.
Mundy, Garrett. 2017. Energy bills in WA to climb $200 in next two years, Australian Energy Market Commission says 2016 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-14/wa-energy-bills-to-rise-200-in-next-two-years-aemc-says/8119250.
Mysolarprojects. 2017. Solar 101 - Learn How Solar Power Work 2011 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.mysolarprojects.com/solar101.html.
OpenEI. 2017. Definition: Transmission Customer, 1 July 2012 2012 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://openei.org/wiki/Definition:Transmission_Customer.
Peterson, Nicholas. 2017. GENERATOR FUEL TYPES. Critical Power Products & Services 2015 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.criticalpower.com/generator-fuel-types/.
Singh, Anand, Prashant Baredar, and Bhupendra Gupta. 2015. "Computational Simulation & Optimization of a Solar, Fuel Cell and Biomass Hybrid Energy System Using HOMER Pro Software." Procedia Engineering no. 127 (Supplement C):743-750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.408.
Supply, Department of Energy and Water. 2017. Electricity tariffs and charges explained. Queensland Government 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.dews.qld.gov.au/electricity/prices/tariffs.
Supply, Diesel Service &. 2017. How Does a Generator Create Electricity? How Generators Work 2016 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.dieselserviceandsupply.com/How_Generators_Work.aspx.
Synergy. 2017. How much energy will my solar panels generate? 2017a [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from https://www.synergy.net.au/Your-home/Help-and-advice/Solar-credits-and-upgrades/How-much-energy-will-my-solar-panels-generate-Resi.
Synergy. Synergy Home Plan® (A1) tariff 2017b [cited 3 November. Available from https://www.synergy.net.au/Your-home/Energy-plans/Home-Plan-A1.
System, Power. 2017. How do batteries work? 2016 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/power/2-how-do-batteries-work.html.
Team, The Go Green. 2017. How Solar Panels Work – A Guide For Dummies 2012 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://gogreena.co.uk/how-solar-panels-work-a-guide-for-dummies/.
Tutorial, Basic Electronics. 2017. Electromagnetic Induction and Faradays Law. AspenCore 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/electromagnetism/electromagnetic-induction.html.
Up, Power. 2017. Electricity in the home 2017 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available from http://powerup.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/powerup/en/under-11/electricity-in-the-home/.
webosolar.com. 2017. SMA Sunny Boy SB5.0-1SP-US-40 Inverter with Integrated Disconnect. Woodford, Chris. 2017. Batteries, 9 March 2017 2006/2016 [cited 3 November 2017]. Available
from http://www.explainthatstuff.com/batteries.html.