DETERMINATION DETERMINATION OF THE IONIZATION AND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES OF THE IONIZATION AND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES OF THE HYDROGEN MOLECULE OF THE HYDROGEN MOLECULE Jinjun Liu , 1 Edcel J. Salumbides, 2 Urs Hollenstein, 1 Jeroen C. J. Koelemeij, 2 Kjeld S. E. Eikema, 2 Wim Ubachs, 2 and Frédéric Merkt 1 1 Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH-Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Laser Centre, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
17
Embed
DETERMINATION OF THE IONIZATION AND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES OF THE HYDROGEN MOLECULE Jinjun Liu, 1 Edcel J. Salumbides, 2 Urs Hollenstein, 1 Jeroen C. J.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DETERMINATION DETERMINATION
OF THE IONIZATION AND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES OF THE IONIZATION AND DISSOCIATION ENERGIES
OF THE HYDROGEN MOLECULEOF THE HYDROGEN MOLECULEJinjun Liu,1 Edcel J. Salumbides,2
Urs Hollenstein,1 Jeroen C. J. Koelemeij,2 Kjeld S. E. Eikema,2 Wim Ubachs,2 and Frédéric Merkt1
1 Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH-Zürich,
8093 Zürich, Switzerland2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Laser Centre, Vrije Universiteit,
De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Motivation
The hydrogen molecule is an important system for testing molecular quantum mechanics.
The ionization energy (E i) and dissociation energy (D0) of H2 are benchmark quantities for ab initio calculations.
The precision of both the experimental and theoretical values for E i(H2) and D0(H2) has been improved by more than an order of magnitude over the past three decades and the latest ones are:
Experimental: E i(H2)exp=124417.476(12) cm−1 [2] D0(H2)exp=36 118.062(10) cm−1 [3] Theoretical: E i(H2)cal =124417.491 cm−1 [4] D0(H2)cal =36 118.069 cm−1 [4]
New experimental determination of E i(H2) and/or D0(H2) with improved precision would represent a more stringent test for future theoretical calculations.
[2] A. de Lange, E. Reinhold, and W. Ubachs, Phys. Rev. A 65, 064501 (2002).[3] Y. P. Zhang, C. H. Cheng, J. T. Kim, J. Stanojevic, and E. E. Eyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 203003 (2004).[4] L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1792 (1995).
Energy level diagram
1 ( 0)gX
1 ( 0)gEF 2
2 ( 0, 1, 1/ 2), 1/ 2gX N G F
NnlN
N
2 ( 0, 1,center)gX N
2 ( 0, 0)gX N
(7)
(1)
(2)
(3)(4)
(5)
(6)
154 1 ( 0), 0 2p S F
151 1 ( 1/ 2), 0d G F
1
0
2
1
0
397 nm202 nm
i2
(ort
ho-H
)E
i2
i2
(H)
(par
a-H
)E
E
i 2
i 2 i 2 i 2
(ortho-H ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
(H ) (para-H ) (1) (ortho-H ) (7)
E
E E E
bin
din
gen
erg
y
Experimental setup
54p
202 nm 397 nm
1 gX
1 gEF
Beam 1 Beam 2
20 MHz
-10.4 cm
Absolute frequency calibration
NIR Doppler-free saturation absorption spectroscopy of I2
at VU & ETH
Frequency comb at VU
Coherent 899-29 Ti:Sa Ring Laser
PD1
PD2
Lock-in / Piezo Driver/Oscillator / RF Rriver
PolarizationStabilized He-Ne
AOM
PZTConfocal Fabry-Perot Cavity
Relative frequency calibrationHe-Ne stabilized etalon
[5] S. Hannemann, E. J. Salumbides, S. Witte, R. T. Zinkstok, E. J. van Duijn, K. S. E. Eikema, and W. Ubachs, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062514 (2006).[6] A. Osterwalder, A. W¨uest, F. Merkt, and Ch. Jungen, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11810 (2004).[8] D. E. Jennings, S. L. Bragg, and J.W. Brault, Astrophys. J. 282, L85 (1984).[9] V. I. Korobov, Physical Review A 73, 024502 (2006).[10] V. I. Korobov, Physical Review A 74, 052506 (2006).[11] V. I. Korobov, Physical Review A 77, 022509 (2008).[25] J.-P. Karr, F. Bielsa, A. Douillet, J. P. Gutierrez, V. I. Korobov, and L. Hilico, Phys. Rev. A 77, 063410 (2008).
History of determination of E
i(H2)
[4] L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1792 (1995).[24] G. Herzberg and Ch. Jungen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 41, 425 1972.[33] G. Herzberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1081 (1969).
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 20080.46
0.47
0.48
0.49
0.50
0.51
0.52
0.53
0.54
Ei(H
2)-
12
44
17
(cm
-1)
year
theoretical experimental
Ei(H
2)-
1244
17 (
cm-1)
year
this work
Dissociation energy of H2
+0 2 i 2 0 2 i
+i 2 i 2 i i
+i 2 i 2 i
D (H )= (H )+D (H )- (H)
= (H )+[ (H )- (H)]- (H)
= (H )+ (H )-2 (H)
E E
E E E E
E E E
Dissociation energy of H2
The latest experimental and theoretical values for D0(H2) are:
New determination of D0(H2) E i(H2)exp =124417.49111(43) cm-1
E i(H2+)cal=131058.1219761(10) cm-1 [9-11]
E i(H)cal =109678.7717414(18) cm-1
D0(H2) =E i(H2)+E i(H2+)-2E i(H)
= 36118.06962(37) cm-1
[3] Y. P. Zhang, C. H. Cheng, J. T. Kim, J. Stanojevic, and E. E. Eyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 203003 (2004).[4] L. Wolniewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1792 (1995).[9] V.I. Korobov, Phys. Rev. A 73, 024502 (2006).[10] V.I. Korobov, Phys. Rev. A 74, 052506 (2006).[11] V.I. Korobov, Phys. Rev. A 77, 022509 (2008).
Conclusions and future work
Published in: J. Chem. Phys. 130(17), 174306 (2009)
-10 2
-1
(H ) 36118.06962(37) cm
v.s. 36118.069 cm from calculations.
D
ab initio
11
-1statistical systematic
54 1 ( 0, center) ( 0, 1)
= 25209.99756 (0.00022) (0.00007) cm
gp S EF N
-1i 2
-1i 2 i 2
-1
(ortho-H )=124357.23797(36) cm
(H ) (para-H )=124417.49113(37) cm
v.s. 124417.491 cm from calculations.
E
E E
ab initio
D2 and HD
Acknowledgments Merkt Group (ETH Zurich) Ubachs Group (VU Amsterdam)