Top Banner
Determinants Determinants of Agricultural and of Agricultural and Mineral Mineral Commodity Prices Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Reserve Bank of Australia, August 2009. Reserve Bank of Australia, August 2009.
50

Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Barrie Garrett
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Determinants Determinants of Agricultural and Mineralof Agricultural and MineralCommodity PricesCommodity Prices

Jeffrey A. Frankel,Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, &Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose,Andrew K. Rose, University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of California, Berkeley

Reserve Bank of Australia, August 2009. Reserve Bank of Australia, August 2009.

Page 2: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

22

Determination of Prices for Oil and Determination of Prices for Oil and Other Mineral & Agricultural Other Mineral & Agricultural CommoditiesCommodities

Predominantly microeconomic. Predominantly microeconomic. Still, difficult to ignore macroeconomic Still, difficult to ignore macroeconomic

influences sometimes.influences sometimes. Examples: many commodity prices Examples: many commodity prices

move far in same direction at the move far in same direction at the same time:same time: The decade of the 1970s. The decade of the 1970s. The decade of the 2000s.The decade of the 2000s.

Page 3: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

33

► ► Increase in Increase in oil price oil price can can be explained by “peak oil” be explained by “peak oil” fears, a risk premium on fears, a risk premium on Gulf instability, or political Gulf instability, or political developments in Russia, developments in Russia, Nigeria or Venezuela... Nigeria or Venezuela...

► Some ► Some farm prices farm prices might be explained by might be explained by drought in Australia, drought in Australia, shortages in China, or shortages in China, or ethanol subsidies in the ethanol subsidies in the US.US.

Page 4: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

44

But it But it Cannot be Coincidence Cannot be Coincidence that that almost all commodity prices rose almost all commodity prices rose together during much of the together during much of the decade, and peaked abruptly in decade, and peaked abruptly in mid-2008.mid-2008.

Nominal and Real Commodity Price IndicesNatural logarithms

Nominal DJ/AIG

1960 1975 1990 20083.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

Nominal Bridge/CRB

1960 1975 1990 20084.5

5

5.5

6

Real DJ/AIG

1960 1975 1990 2008-.5

0

.5

1

Real Bridge/CRB

1960 1975 1990 2008.5

1

1.5

2

Page 5: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Our InnovationOur Innovation

Combine Combine Macro and Micro Macro and Micro Determinants Determinants of Commodity Pricesof Commodity Prices

Hope: Get macro swings nested inside Hope: Get macro swings nested inside well-grounded micro modelwell-grounded micro model

Need Good Micro Data on Determinants Need Good Micro Data on Determinants of Individual Commoditiesof Individual Commodities

55

Page 6: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

66

Three “Aggregate” Theories Explain Three “Aggregate” Theories Explain the Recent Rise of Commodity Pricesthe Recent Rise of Commodity Prices

1.1. Destabilizing SpeculationDestabilizing Speculation. . Storability & Homogeneity Storability & Homogeneity

=> Asset-like Speculation => Asset-like Speculation

2.2. Monetary: Monetary: Low Real Interest RatesLow Real Interest Rates Or High Expected InflationOr High Expected Inflation

3.3. Global Demand Growth.Global Demand Growth. Actual/Future Growth (China …)Actual/Future Growth (China …)

Page 7: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Issues Exist with All Issues Exist with All Three “Explanations”Three “Explanations”

In Theory, Speculation may be StabilizingIn Theory, Speculation may be Stabilizing

Empirical Issues with All Three TheoriesEmpirical Issues with All Three Theories

77

Page 8: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

88

Counter-Evidence to Claims of Counter-Evidence to Claims of Destabilizing SpeculationDestabilizing Speculation

1. Futures price of oil initially lagged behind 1. Futures price of oil initially lagged behind spot price.spot price.

2. High volume of trading 2. High volume of trading ≠≠ net short position net short position

3. Commodities that lack futures markets are 3. Commodities that lack futures markets are as volatile as those that have them. as volatile as those that have them.

4. Historical efforts to ban speculative futures 4. Historical efforts to ban speculative futures markets have failed to reduce volatility. markets have failed to reduce volatility.

Page 9: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

99

Monetary ExplanationMonetary Explanation

1.1. Some argue that high prices for oil & other Some argue that high prices for oil & other commodities in the 1970s were not exogenous, commodities in the 1970s were not exogenous, but rather a result of easy monetary policy.but rather a result of easy monetary policy.

Perhaps inflation directly raises commodity prices? Commodities Perhaps inflation directly raises commodity prices? Commodities may be an inflation hedge.may be an inflation hedge.

2.2. Conversely, a rise in US real interest rates in the Conversely, a rise in US real interest rates in the early 1980searly 1980s. . helped drive commodity prices downhelped drive commodity prices down ..

3.3. The Fed cut real interest rates sharply,2001-04, The Fed cut real interest rates sharply,2001-04, and again in 2008-09. Did this help push prices and again in 2008-09. Did this help push prices first up, then down?first up, then down?

Page 10: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1010

High Interest Rates in High Interest Rates in TheoryTheory

1.1. Lower inventory demand; Lower inventory demand; andand

2.2. Encourage faster pumping of oil, Encourage faster pumping of oil, mining of deposits, harvesting of crops, etc.,mining of deposits, harvesting of crops, etc., because owners can invest the proceeds at interest because owners can invest the proceeds at interest

rates higher than the return to saving the reserves.rates higher than the return to saving the reserves.

3.3. Both channels – fall in demand and rise in Both channels – fall in demand and rise in supply – work to lower commodity price.supply – work to lower commodity price.

Page 11: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1111

But … Counter-arguments ExistBut … Counter-arguments Exist

Inventories of oil & other commodities said to be low Inventories of oil & other commodities said to be low in 2008, contrary to the theory (Krugman, Kohn)in 2008, contrary to the theory (Krugman, Kohn)

Perhaps inventory numbersPerhaps inventory numbers do not capture all inventories, ordo not capture all inventories, or are less relevant than (larger) reserves.are less relevant than (larger) reserves.

King of Saudi Arabia (2008): King of Saudi Arabia (2008): “we might as well leave the reserves “we might as well leave the reserves in the ground for our grandchildren.”in the ground for our grandchildren.”

How Important are Monetary Effects? How Important are Monetary Effects?

Page 12: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1212

Global Boom Theory Global Boom Theory Reasonable?Reasonable?

Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis hit US, August 2007. hit US, August 2007.

Thereafter, Growth Forecasts Fell GloballyThereafter, Growth Forecasts Fell Globally But Commodity Prices did not But Commodity Prices did not DeclineDecline; their ; their

rise actually rise actually AcceleratedAccelerated. .

Page 13: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Quick Peek at Aggregate Data: Quick Peek at Aggregate Data: LittleLittle

````

1313

Bivariate Macro Scatter Plots

DJ/AIG and Real Interest rateslope=-.04 (.02)

-5 0 5-.5

0

.5

1

Bridge/CRB and Real Interest rateslope=-.02 (.02)

-5 0 5.5

1

1.5

2

DJ/AIG and World GDP Growthslope=.06 (.03)

0 2 4 6 8-.5

0

.5

1

Bridge/CRB and World GDP Growthslope=.06 (.03)

0 2 4 6 8.5

1

1.5

2

Page 14: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

But Perhaps Too Macro?But Perhaps Too Macro?

Need to Control for Micro Determinants Need to Control for Micro Determinants of Commodity Pricesof Commodity Prices

Our Objective: Our Objective: IntegrateIntegrate Micro and Macro Micro and Macro Commodity Price DeterminationCommodity Price Determination TheoryTheory Empirical EstimationEmpirical Estimation

1414

Page 15: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1515

““Overshooting” Theory of Overshooting” Theory of Real Commodity PricesReal Commodity Prices

ss ≡ the spot price, ≡ the spot price, S ≡ its long run equilibrium, S ≡ its long run equilibrium, p p ≡ the economy-wide price index, ≡ the economy-wide price index, q ≡ s-pq ≡ s-p, the real price of the commodity, , the real price of the commodity,

andand Q Q ≡ ≡ the long run equilibrium real price of the long run equilibrium real price of

the commodity;the commodity; all in log form. all in log form.

Page 16: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1616

Derive Relationship for Real Derive Relationship for Real Commodity from Two Commodity from Two Equations:Equations:

Regressive Expectations (can be Rational):Regressive Expectations (can be Rational): E (Δs) = - θ (q-Q)E (Δs) = - θ (q-Q) + + E(ΔpE(Δp))

““Arbitrage-like” condition links Inventories & Bonds:Arbitrage-like” condition links Inventories & Bonds: E Δs + c = iE Δs + c = i

where where c ≡ cy – sc – rp .c ≡ cy – sc – rp . cycy ≡ ≡ convenience yield from holding the stock (e.g., the insurance value of convenience yield from holding the stock (e.g., the insurance value of

having an assured supply of a critical input in the event of a disruption)having an assured supply of a critical input in the event of a disruption)scsc ≡≡ storage costs (e.g., rental rate on oil tanks, etc.) storage costs (e.g., rental rate on oil tanks, etc.) rp rp ≡ ≡ E Δs – (f-s) E Δs – (f-s) ≡≡ risk premium, risk premium, >0 if being long in commodities is risky, and>0 if being long in commodities is risky, andii ≡≡ the interest rate the interest rate

Page 17: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1717

Combining:Combining:

q - Q = - (1/q - Q = - (1/θθ) (i - E() (i - E(ΔΔpp) – c) ) – c)

This inverse relationship between q & r This inverse relationship between q & r has already been somewhat studiedhas already been somewhat studied Event studies Event studies (monetary announcements)(monetary announcements) Regressions of Regressions of q q against against rr in Frankel (2008):in Frankel (2008):

Significant for half of the individual commoditiesSignificant for half of the individual commodities and in a panel studyand in a panel study and for various aggregate commodity price indicesand for various aggregate commodity price indices

But much is left out of this equation.But much is left out of this equation. Especially variation in Especially variation in cc

Page 18: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1818

Observable Manifestations of Observable Manifestations of Convenience Yield, Storage Costs, Convenience Yield, Storage Costs, & Risk Premium (c)& Risk Premium (c)

1. Inventories1. InventoriesStorage costs rise with inventoryStorage costs rise with inventory Measured with World inventories where possible, US Measured with World inventories where possible, US

otherwiseotherwise Could also estimate an inventory equationCould also estimate an inventory equation

Page 19: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

1919

Other DeterminantsOther Determinants

2. Real GDP2. Real GDP Transactions Demand for Inventories, Transactions Demand for Inventories,

determinant of convenience yield determinant of convenience yield cycy Measured with real World GDP, Measured with real World GDP, Also try OECD output gap, de-trend, G-7, IP …Also try OECD output gap, de-trend, G-7, IP …

3. The spot-futures spread, 3. The spot-futures spread, s-fs-f High spread (“normal backwardation:) signifies High spread (“normal backwardation:) signifies

low speculative return, hence negative effect on low speculative return, hence negative effect on inventory demand and pricesinventory demand and prices Measurement more straightforwardMeasurement more straightforward

Page 20: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2020

Uncertainty MeasuresUncertainty Measures

4. Medium-term volatility4. Medium-term volatility (σ) (σ) Volatility a determinant of convenience yield, Volatility a determinant of convenience yield,

and so of commodity pricesand so of commodity prices May also be determinant of risk premiumMay also be determinant of risk premium

Measured as standard deviation of spot price Measured as standard deviation of spot price Can also extract implicit forward-looking expected Can also extract implicit forward-looking expected

volatility from options pricesvolatility from options prices

Page 21: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2121

5. Risk5. Risk (political, financial, & economic) (political, financial, & economic) Theoretical effect ambiguous: Theoretical effect ambiguous:

Risk a determinant of Risk a determinant of cycy (fear of (fear of

supply disruption), should havesupply disruption), should have

a a positivepositive effect on commodity prices effect on commodity prices Also a determinant of rp, riskAlso a determinant of rp, risk

premium, should have a premium, should have a negativenegative effect on prices effect on prices

Measured (e.g., for oil) by weighted average of Measured (e.g., for oil) by weighted average of (inverse) political risk for 12 top (oil) producers(inverse) political risk for 12 top (oil) producers Data availability issues; hence not always includedData availability issues; hence not always included

Page 22: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2222

Complete EquationComplete Equation

q = Q - (1/q = Q - (1/θθ) r ) r + + (1/ (1/θθ)) γγ(Y) + (1/(Y) + (1/θθ)Ψ )Ψ ((σσ)) - (1/ - (1/θθ) ) Φ (Φ (INVENTORIES)INVENTORIES)-δ(-δ(s-fs-f)) Objective: Determine (log) real commodity Objective: Determine (log) real commodity

priceprice 3 Micro determinants3 Micro determinants

Volatility; spread; inventoriesVolatility; spread; inventories

2 Macro determinants2 Macro determinants World GDP; real interest ratesWorld GDP; real interest rates

Page 23: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2323

Estimation StrategyEstimation Strategy

Gather, use dis-aggregated data on 11 Gather, use dis-aggregated data on 11 commodity panelcommodity panel Annual data from 1960s to 2008Annual data from 1960s to 2008 Commodities, span, frequency chosen to Commodities, span, frequency chosen to

maximize data availabilitymaximize data availability

Page 24: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2424Log Real Spot Price

Corn

1950 1975 2008-4

-3.5

-3

-2.5

Copper

1950 1975 2008-.5

0.51

1.5

Cotton

1950 1975 2008-1

-.5

0

.5

Gold

1950 1975 20080

1

2

3

Cattle

1950 1975 2008-.5

0

.5

Hogs

1950 1975 2008-1

-.5

0

.5

Oats

1950 1975 2008-4.5

-4

-3.5

-3

Oil

1950 1975 2008-2.5

-2-1.5

-1-.5

Platinum

1950 1975 20081

1.5

2

2.5

Silver

1950 1975 2008-3

-2

-1

Soybeans

1950 1975 2008-3.5

-3-2.5

-2-1.5

Wheat

1950 1975 2008-4

-3.5-3

-2.5-2

Booms around 1974-75 and 2008

Page 25: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2525

Table 3a: Panel Results, Table 3a: Panel Results, for logfor log real commodity prices,real commodity prices,

Ln(World Ln(World Real GDP)Real GDP)

VolatilityVolatility Spot-Spot-Futures Futures SpreadSpread

Inven-Inven-toriestories

Real Real USUS

interest interest raterate

.60.60 2.29**2.29** -.003*-.003* -.15**-.15** -.01-.01

(.27)(.27) (.40)(.40) (.001)(.001) (.02)(.02) (.01)(.01)

** (*) => significantly different from zero at .01 (.05) significance level. Robust standard errors in parentheses; Intercept & trend included, not reported.

Page 26: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Results Seem SensibleResults Seem Sensible

Micro Factors all “correctly” signedMicro Factors all “correctly” signed Statistically significantStatistically significant

Macro Factors correctly signedMacro Factors correctly signed World GDP: statistically marginal effectWorld GDP: statistically marginal effect Real Interest Rate Real Interest Rate consistently unreliableconsistently unreliable

Biggest DisappointmentBiggest Disappointment

2626

Page 27: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Results Also RobustResults Also Robust

Results insensitive to exact econometric Results insensitive to exact econometric specification, model of world activityspecification, model of world activity Many variants reported in Table 3aMany variants reported in Table 3a Results from first-differences in Table 3bResults from first-differences in Table 3b

Possibly relevant because of (lack of) co-Possibly relevant because of (lack of) co-integrationintegration

2727

Page 28: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Reasonable Fit to DataReasonable Fit to Data

Fitted Against Actual (Log Real) Commodity PricesBasic Equation, Table 3

Fitted, with FE

-4 -2 0 2 4-4

-2

0

2

4

Without FE

-4 -2 0 2 4-4

-2

0

2

4

Add Bandwagon Effect, Table 4

-4 -2 0 2 4

-4

-2

0

2

4

Add Inflation Effect, Table 5

-4 -2 0 2 4-4

-2

0

2

4

2828

Page 29: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

2929

Table 4: To Look for Table 4: To Look for Bandwagon Expectations, Add Bandwagon Expectations, Add

Lagged Rate of Commodity Lagged Rate of Commodity Price RisePrice Rise

Ln(WorldLn(World

Real GDP)Real GDP)

VolatilityVolatility Spot-Spot-Futures Futures SpreadSpread

Inven-Inven-toriestories

Real Real USUS

interest interest raterate

Lag of Lag of NominalNominal

Price Price GrowthGrowth

.50.50 1.84**1.84** -.004**-.004** -.13**-.13** .00.00 .0061**.0061**

(.27)(.27) (.40)(.40) (.001)(.001) (.02)(.02) (.01)(.01) (.0005)(.0005)

** (*) => significantly different from zero at .01 (.05) significance level. Robust standard errors in parentheses; Intercept & trend included, not reported.

Page 30: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Bandwagon Effects!Bandwagon Effects!

Commodity Prices Positively, Commodity Prices Positively, Significantly affected by Lagged Growth Significantly affected by Lagged Growth in in NominalNominal Commodity Price Commodity Price Small but Insensitive EffectSmall but Insensitive Effect

Another Inefficiency in Commodity Another Inefficiency in Commodity Markets?Markets? Helps Explain Recent Run-Up (somewhat)Helps Explain Recent Run-Up (somewhat)

3030

Page 31: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3131

Table 5: To Look for Another Table 5: To Look for Another indicator of Monetary Ease, indicator of Monetary Ease,

Add Aggregate InflationAdd Aggregate Inflation

Ln(WorldLn(World

Real GDP)Real GDP)

VolatilityVolatility Spot-Spot-Futures Futures SpreadSpread

Inven-Inven-toriestories

Real Real USUS

interest interest raterate

InflationInflation

-2.11**-2.11** 2.12**2.12** -.003**-.003** -.14**-.14** .02.02 .082**.082**

(.61)(.61) (.27)(.27) (.001)(.001) (.02)(.02) (.01)(.01) (.015)(.015)

** (*) => significantly different from zero at .01 (.05) significance level. Robust standard errors in parentheses; Intercept & trend included, not reported.

Page 32: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Inflation Effects!Inflation Effects!

Commodity Prices Positively, Commodity Prices Positively, Significantly affected by InflationSignificantly affected by Inflation Again: Robust Results, but SmallAgain: Robust Results, but Small Probably negligible effect for conduct of Probably negligible effect for conduct of

monetary policymonetary policy

Hedge against Inflation?Hedge against Inflation? Doesn’t Explain Recent Run-UpDoesn’t Explain Recent Run-Up

3232

Page 33: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3333

Other Tests: IndicesOther Tests: Indices

Construct Commodity Price IndicesConstruct Commodity Price Indices Use 6 Weighting SchemesUse 6 Weighting Schemes

Dow-Jones/AIG; S&P GCSI; CRB Dow-Jones/AIG; S&P GCSI; CRB Reuters/Jefferies; Grilli-Yang; Economist; EqualReuters/Jefferies; Grilli-Yang; Economist; Equal

3 Different Periods of Time3 Different Periods of Time Data availability => longer span has fewer Data availability => longer span has fewer

commoditiescommodities

Similar (Weaker) ResultsSimilar (Weaker) Results Micro work OK; poor real interest rate resultsMicro work OK; poor real interest rate results

Page 34: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3434

Other Tests: Hi-TechOther Tests: Hi-Tech

Unit root testsUnit root tests Philips-Perron on individual commoditiesPhilips-Perron on individual commodities Panel unit-root testsPanel unit-root tests

Co-integration testsCo-integration tests Johansen on individual commoditiesJohansen on individual commodities Panels tooPanels too Vector error correction resultsVector error correction results

Page 35: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3535

Overall Model PerformanceOverall Model Performance

The commodity-specific explanatory factors The commodity-specific explanatory factors work (surprisingly) well:work (surprisingly) well: Inventory holdingsInventory holdings Spot-futures spreadSpot-futures spread VolatilityVolatility

Macroeconomic variables work (surprisingly) Macroeconomic variables work (surprisingly) poorly:poorly: Economic activityEconomic activity (Especially) Real interest rates(Especially) Real interest rates

Page 36: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3636

Possible ExtensionsPossible Extensions

Survey data as direct measure of Survey data as direct measure of expectationsexpectations

Higher Frequency data (on fewer Higher Frequency data (on fewer commodities, shorter time-span)commodities, shorter time-span)

Modeling non-linearitiesModeling non-linearities Estimate simultaneous system in Estimate simultaneous system in

inventories, expectations, and commodity inventories, expectations, and commodity prices, tied directly to the theoryprices, tied directly to the theory

Page 37: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

ConclusionConclusion

Model works reasonably:Model works reasonably: Micro determinants work wellMicro determinants work well Macro phenomena Macro phenomena not not as importantas important

Real growth raises real commodty pricesReal growth raises real commodty prices As does inflationAs does inflation But real interest rate channel fails here.But real interest rate channel fails here.

Evidence of Bandwagon EffectsEvidence of Bandwagon Effects ““Speculative Bubble” possible in CommoditiesSpeculative Bubble” possible in Commodities Helps explains 2007-9 boom and bust?Helps explains 2007-9 boom and bust?

3737

Page 38: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3838

AppendicesAppendices

Graphs of data Why American interest rates? Commodity-specific Results Full Panel Results

Page 39: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

3939Volatility

Corn

1950 1975 20080

.05.1

.15.2

Copper

1950 1975 20080

.2

.4

Cotton

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Gold

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Cattle

1950 1975 20080

.05.1

.15.2

Hogs

1950 1975 20080

.05.1

.15.2

Oats

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

Oil

1950 1975 20080

.2

.4

Platinum

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Silver

1950 1975 20080.1.2.3.4

Soybeans

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Wheat

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Page 40: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

4040

Log Inventory

Corn

1950 1975 200810.5

1111.5

1212.5

Copper

1950 1975 200811

12

13

14

Cotton

1950 1975 20089.5

10

10.5

11

Gold

195019752008-1-.5

0.51

Cattle

1950 1975 200811.2

11.4

11.6

11.8

Hogs

1950 1975 2008

10.710.810.9

1111.1

Oats

1950 1975 200811

12

13

Oil

1950 1975 20087.8

8

8.2

8.4

Platinum

1950 1975 2008-20246

Silver

1950 1975 200845678

Soybeans

1950 1975 2008789

1011

Wheat

1950 1975 200811

11.5

12

12.5

Page 41: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

4141

Future-Spot Spread

Corn

1950 1975 2008-40-20

02040

Copper

1950 1975 2008-60-40-20

020

Cotton

1950 1975 2008-50

0

50

100

Gold

1950 1975 2008-20

0

20

40

Cattle

1950 1975 2008-40

-20

0

20

Hogs

1950 1975 2008-50

0

50

100

Oats

1950 1975 2008-40-20

02040

Oil

1950 1975 2008-50

0

50

100

Platinum

1950 1975 2008-50

0

50

100

Silver

1950 1975 2008-50

0

50

Soybeans

1950 1975 2008-40-20

02040

Wheat

1950 1975 2008-40-20

02040

Page 42: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

4242

Risk

Corn

1950 1975 200801234

Copper

1950 1975 20080

.5

1

1.5

Cotton

1950 1975 20080

1

2

3

Gold

1950 1975 20080

.5

1

1.5

Cattle

1950 1975 20080

.2

.4

Hogs

1950 1975 2008

01234

Oats

1950 1975 20080.51

1.52

Oil

1950 1975 200801234

Platinum

1950 1975 20080

1

2

3

Silver

1950 1975 20080.51

1.52

Soybeans

1950 1975 20080

2

4

Wheat

1950 1975 20080

.1

.2

.3

Page 43: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

4343

Real Activity

Log Real World GDP

1950 1975 200829.5

30

30.5

31

31.5

World Growth Rate

1950 1975 20080

2

4

6

8

OECD output gap

1950 1975 2008-4

-2

0

2

4

Log Real World GDP - HP Trend

1950 1975 2008

-.02

0

.02

Page 44: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Why American Real Why American Real Interest Rates?Interest Rates?

Assume commodity markets integratedAssume commodity markets integrated If so, denomination doesn’t matterIf so, denomination doesn’t matter Data availability issues for G-3/G-7 Data availability issues for G-3/G-7

interest ratesinterest rates Inevitable EMU issuesInevitable EMU issues

4444

Page 45: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Table 2a: Commodity-Specific ResultsTable 2a: Commodity-Specific ResultsReal World

GDP (+)Volatility

+Spot-Future Spread (-)

Inventories(-)

Real Interest Rate (-)

Corn 1.53*(.69)

1.52(.89)

-.003(.003)

-.18(.17)

-.01(.02)

Copper .03(.68)

1.92**(.54)

-.005(.003)

-.21**(.06_

-.03(.01)

Cotton .66(.85)

1.07(.57)

-.002(.002)

-.12(.14)

.01(.01)

Cattle 7.37**(1.03)

-.65(.34)

-.007(.002)

2.37**(.48)

-.06**(.01)

Hogs -.57(1.64)

.64(.71)

-.004*(.002)

.18(.31)

-.03**(.01)

Oats 2.66**(.71)

3.28(1.69)

-.006**(.002)

-.59**(.11)

-.02(.01)

Oil .05(8.60)

.57(1.69)

-.003(.003)

-2.52(5.02)

-.01(.07)

Platinum 1.22(2.17)

1.78*(.87)

.002(.002)

-.21**(.03)

.08**(.01)

Silver 2.69(2.13)

3.32**(.73)

.003(.003)

-.37*(.18)

.01(.03)

Soybeans 1.94**(.70)

2.68**(.55)

-.001(.002)

-.05(.07)

-.01(.01)

Wheat -5.98*(2.79)

1.90**(.47)

.008*(.003)

-1.42**(.27)

.03(.02)

4545

Page 46: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Full Panel Results Full Panel Results Table 3a: Table 3a: LevelsLevels

Real World GDP (+)

Volatility(+)

Spot-Future Spread (-)

Inventories(-)

Real Interest Rate (-)

Basic .60(.27)

2.29**(.40)

-.003*(.001)

-.15**(.02)

-.01(.01)

Drop Fixed Effects .56(.31)

2.65(1.40)

-.023**(.006)

-.20**(.03)

.02(.04)

Substitute Time Effects

n/a 2.32(1.80)

-.026**(.007)

-.20**(.01)

n/a

Time and Fixed Effects

n/a 1.61**(.29)

-.002*(.001)

-.13**(.01)

n/a

Drop Spread .58(.30)

2.36**(.38)

n/a -.15**(.02)

-.01(.01)

Growth (not log) of World GDP

-.01(.01)

2.36**(.40)

-.003(.001)

-.15**(.02)

-.00(.01)

OECD Output Gap .01(.01)

2.34**(.44)

-.002*(.001)

-.15**(.02)

-.01(.01)

HP-Filtered GDP 2.35(1.47)

2.32**(.43)

-.003*(.001)

-.14**(.02)

-.01(.01)

Add Quadratic Trend

.48(.40)

2.30**(.40)

-.003*(.001)

-.15**(.02)

-.01(.01) 4646

Page 47: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Table 3b: Panel Results, First-Table 3b: Panel Results, First-DifferencesDifferences

RealWorld GDP

+

Volatility+

Spot-Future Spread-

Inventories-

Real Interest Rate-

Basic .03**(.01)

.75**(.24)

-.002**(.001)

-.10*(.05)

.00(.01)

Drop Fixed Effects .03**(.01)

.78**(.17)

-.002**(.001)

-.11**(.04)

.00(.01)

Substitute Time Effects

n/a .55**(.19)

-.002**(.001)

-.08*(.04)

n/a

Time and Fixed Effects

n/a .53**(.18)

-.002**(.001)

-.07(.04)

n/a

Drop Spread .04**(.01)

-.0020**(.0005)

-.10(.05)

-.00(.01)

OECD Output Gap .03**(.01)

.77*(.25)

-.0018**(.0005)

-.12*(.04)

.01(.01)

HP-Filtered GDP 4.91**(.97)

.78*(.23)

-.002**(.001)

-.12*(.04)

.01(.01)

Add Quadratic Trend .03**(.01)

.75**(.24)

-.002**(.001)

-.10*(.05)

.00(.01)

4747

Page 48: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Table 4: Panel Results, BandwagonsTable 4: Panel Results, Bandwagons

Real World GDP (+)

Volatility(+)

Spot-Future Spread (-)

Inventories(-)

Real Interest Rate (-)

Lagged PriceChange (+)

Basic .50(.27)

1.84**(.40)

-.004**(.001)

-.13**(.02)

.00(.01)

.0061**(.0005)

Drop Fixed Effects .57(.31)

1.92(1.42)

-.025**(.006)

-.19**(.03)

.04(.04)

.0104*(.0044)

Substitute Time Effects

n/a 1.84(1.90)

-.028**(.007)

-.19**(.01)

n/a .0101(.0067)

Time and Fixed Effects

n/a 1.37**(.28)

-.004**(.001)

-.12**(.01)

n/a .0050**(.0008)

Drop Spread .48(.32)

2.01**(.37)

-.14**(.02)

-.00(.01)

.0053**(.0005)

Growth (not log) of World GDP

-.01(.01)

1.90**(.40)

-.005**(.001)

-.13**(.02)

.01(.01)

.0061**(.0005)

OECD Output Gap -.00(.01)

1.90**(.43)

-.004**(.001)

-.13**(.02)

.01(.01)

.0063**(.0005)

HP-Filtered GDP -.71(1.58)

1.92**(.42)

-.004**(.001)

-.13**(.02)

.01(.01)

.0062**(.0005)

Add Quadratic Trend

.26(.37)

1.85**(.41)

-.004**(.001)

-.13**(.02)

.01(.01)

.0062**(.0005)

Drop post-2003 data 1.21**(.28)

1.26(.58)

-.004**(.001)

-.11**(.04)

.01(.01)

.0049**(.0005)

With AR(1) Residuals

2.08*(.81)

.89**(.13)

-.0033**(.00004)

-.10**(.03)

.00(.01)

.0031**(.0004) 4848

Page 49: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

Table 5: Panel Results, Adding InflationTable 5: Panel Results, Adding Inflation

Real World GDP +

Volatility+

Spot-Future Spread -

Inventories-

Real Interest Rate -

Inflation

Basic -2.11**(.61)

2.12**(.27)

-.0032**(.0007)

-.14**(.02)

.019(.012)

.082**(.015)

Drop Fixed Effects

.70*(.32)

2.25(1.43)

-.023**(.006)

-.19**(.03)

.040(.038)

.075(.041)

Drop Spread -2.04**(.63)

2.21**(.26)

-.15**(.02)

.015(.012)

.079**(.015)

Growth (not log) of World GDP

.02(.01)

2.01**(.32)

-.0027**(.0007)

-.15**(.02)

.006(.011)

.058**(.010)

OECD Output Gap

-.00(.01)

2.09**(.28)

-.0030**(.0007)

-.15**(.02)

.014(.012)

.083**(.014)

HP-Filtered GDP

.19(1.64)

2.03**(.33)

-.0031**(.0008)

-.15**(.02)

.005(.013)

.051**(.009)

Add Quadratic Trend

-2.47**(.76)

2.14**(.27)

-.0032**(.0006)

-.14**(.02)

.017(.011)

.085**(.015)

4949

Page 50: Determinants of Agricultural and Mineral Commodity Prices Jeffrey A. Frankel, Harvard University, & Andrew K. Rose, University of California, Berkeley.

5050