Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting February 3, 2012
Feb 04, 2016
Detector / Interaction Region Integration
Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski
Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting February 3, 2012
-- 2 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Motivation
Pawel Nadel-Turonski
-- 3 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Central detector
EM
Cal
orim
eter
Had
ron
Cal
orim
eter
Muo
n D
etec
tor
EM
Cal
orim
eter
Solenoid yoke + Muon DetectorTOF
HTC
C
RIC
HCerenkov
Tracking
2 m 3 m 2 m
4-5
m
Solenoid yoke + Hadronic Calorimeter
MEIC Primary “Full-Acceptance” Detector
Distance IP – electron FFQs = 3.5 m Distance IP – ion FFQs = 7.0 m (Driven by push to 0.5 detection before ion FFQs)
Pawel Nadel-Turonski & Rolf Ent
solenoid
electron FFQs50 mrad
0 mrad
ion dipole w/ detectors
(approximately to scale)
ionselectrons
IP
ion FFQs
2+3 m2 m
2 m
Make use of the (50 mr) crossing angle for ions!
detectors
Central detector, more detection space in ion direction as particles have higher momenta
Detect particles with angles below 0.5o beyond ion FFQs and in arcs.
Detect particles with angles down to 0.5o before ion FFQs.Need up to 2 Tm dipole in addition to central solenoid.
7 m
-- 4 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
GEANT4 Model• Detector solenoid
– 4 T field at the center, 5 m long, 2.5 m inner radius, IP 2 m downstream from edge • Small spectrometer dipole in front of the FFB
– 1.2 T (@ 60 GeV/c), 1 m long, hard-edge uniform field – Interaction plane and dipole are rotated around z to compensate orbit offset
• FFB• Big spectrometer dipole
– 4 m downstream of the FFB, sector bend, 3.5 m long, 60 mrad bending angle (12 Tm, 3.43 T @ 60 GeV/c), 20 cm square aperture
-- 5 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Separation of Electron and Ion Beams
-- 6 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Beam Parallel after FFB• FFB: quad lengths = 1.2, 2.4, 1.2 m, quad strengths @ 100 GeV/c = -79.6, 41.1, -23.1 T/m• 1.2 Tm (@ 60 GeV/c) outward-bending dipole in front of the final focus• 12 Tm (@ 60 GeV/c) inward-bending dipole 4 m downstream of the final focus
Pawel Nadel-Turonski & Alex Bogacz
-- 7 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
FFB Acceptance• 60 GeV/c protons, each quad aperture = B max / (field gradient @ 100 GeV/c)
6 T max 9 T max 12 T max
-- 8 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
FFB Acceptance for Neutrons
6 T max 9 T max 12 T max
• Neutrons uniformly distributed within 1 horizontal & vertical angles around 60 GeV/c proton beam
• Each quad aperture = B max / (field gradient @ 100 GeV/c)
-- 9 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
System Acceptance at 6 T max Field• Uniform distribution horizontally & vertically within 1 around 60 GeV/c protons• Each quad aperture = 6 T / (field gradient @ 100 GeV/c)
p/p = 0 neutrons
p/p = -0.5 p/p = 0.5
electron beam electron beam
-- 10 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam parallel after the final focus• Protons with p/p spread launched at different angles to nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear
-- 11 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam parallel after the final focus• Protons with p/p spread launched at different angles to nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear
|p/p| > 0.03 @ x,y = 0
-- 12 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam parallel after the final focus• Protons with different p/p launched with x spread around nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear
-- 13 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam parallel after the final focus• Protons with different p/p launched with x spread around nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear |x| > 2 mrad @ p/p = 0
-- 14 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Beam Focused after FFB• FFB: quad lengths = 1.2, 2.4, 1.2 m, quad strengths @ 100 GeV/c = -89.0, 51.1, -35.7 T/m• 1.2 Tm (@ 60 GeV/c) outward-bending dipole in front of the final focus• 12 Tm (@ 60 GeV/c) inward-bending dipole 4 m downstream of the final focus
Pawel Nadel-Turonski & Charles Hyde
-- 15 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
System Acceptance at 6 T max Field• Uniform distribution horizontally & vertically within 1 around 60 GeV/c protons• Each quad aperture = 6 T / (field gradient @ 100 GeV/c)
p/p = 0 neutrons
p/p = -0.5 p/p = 0.5
electron beam electron beam
-- 16 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
System Acceptance with Varied Quad Fields• Uniform distribution horizontally & vertically within 1 around 60 GeV/c protons• Quad apertures = 9, 9, 6 T / (field gradient @ 100 GeV/c)
p/p = -0.5
p/p = 0
p/p = 0.5
neutrons
electron beam electron beam
-- 17 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Detector / IR Layout
np
e
-- 18 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam focused after the FFB• Protons with p/p spread launched at different angles to nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear
-- 19 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam focused after the FFB• Protons with p/p spread launched at different angles to nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear |p/p| > 0.005 @ x,y = 0
-- 20 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam focused after the FFB• Protons with different p/p launched with x spread around nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear
-- 21 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Momentum & Angle Resolution• Beam focused after the FFB• Protons with different p/p launched with x spread around nominal 60 GeV/c trajectory• Red hashed band indicates 10 beam stay-clear |x| > N/A @ p/p = 0
|x| > 3 mrad @ p/p = 0
-- 22 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Electron FFB• Quads nearest to IP are inside strong solenoid fringe field
either permanent-magnet or super-conducting quadrupoles• Consider hybrid electron FFB design (P. Nadel-Turonski & A. Bogacz):
first two quads are permanent-magnet, subsequent quads are super-conducting (smaller OD)
• Outer radius of a permanent-magnet quad (M. Sullivan) depending on the inner radius and field gradient:
rinner = 20 mm, G = 15 T/m router = 23.4 mm• Permanent-magnet quad
– can be placed closer to IP– covers smaller solid angle greater acceptance
1( ) 1 ( / )( ) 2.046
outer
inner
r m G T mr m
-- 23 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Hybrid Electron FFB Optics at 3 GeV/c• Drift lengths: 3, 0.25, 0.25, 1, 0.2 m• Quad lengths: 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.3 m• Quad inner radii: 2, 2, 2, 4, 4 cm; quad outer radii: 3, 3, 9, 11, 11 cm• Quad strengths: -15.0, 15.0, -5.87, 7.70, -8.48 T/m
-- 24 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Hybrid Electron FFB Optics at 5 GeV/c• Drift lengths: 3, 0.25, 0.25, 1, 0.2 m• Quad lengths: 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.3 m• Quad inner radii: 2, 2, 2, 4, 4 cm; quad outer radii: 3, 3, 9, 11, 11 cm• Quad strengths: -15.0, 15.0, -14.7, 20.4, -19.3 T/m
-- 25 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Hybrid Electron FFB Optics at 11 GeV/c• Drift lengths: 3, 0.25, 0.25, 1, 0.2 m• Quad lengths: 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.3 m• Quad inner radii: 2, 2, 2, 4, 4 cm; quad outer radii: 3, 3, 9, 11, 11 cm• Quad strengths: -15.0, 15.0, -34.0, 45.6, -38.0 T/m
-- 26 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Detector / IR Layout
np
e
-- 27 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Upstream Ion / Downstream Electron Side• Electron FFB
– 4 m distance to IP?– 1 polar angle acceptance– Superconducting quads (solenoid fringe field, small size, large aperture)– Electron beam focused inside spectrometer dipole?
• Ion FFB– First quad immediately after first electron quad at ~4.5-5 m – Ion quads interleaved with electron quads
-- 28 --V.S. Morozov 02/03/2012
Conclusions• Completed the study of forward ion tagging, a few design choices to be made
• Request to nuclear physics– Come up with specs for detector resolution requirements – this will help to
motivate and make the design choices, in particular, quantify the advantages of focused vs parallel downstream ion beam
• To do list– Design forward electron tagging and upstream ion FFB– Design optimization, e.g. acceptance of the FFB using genetic algorithm– Integration into the ring optics, such as decoupling, dispersion
compensation, understanding effect of large-aperture quadrupoles on the optics, etc.
– Evaluation of the engineering aspects, such as magnet parameters, electron and ion beam line separation, etc.