1 An Assignment On Detection of pathogens using Genetic Probes Submitted to: Dr. Vijendra Mishra Professor Dairy Microbiology Dept. Submitted by: Ms. Ripan P. Goswami M.Sc. -Dairy Microbiology Reg. No. 04-1143-2009
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 1/25
1
An Assignment
On
Detection of pathogens using
Genetic Probes
Submitted to: Dr. Vijendra Mishra
Professor
Dairy Microbiology Dept.
Submitted by: Ms. Ripan P. Goswami
M.Sc. -Dairy Microbiology
Reg. No. 04-1143-2009
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 2/25
2
Introduction
A pathogen, (from Greek (pathos) "suffering, passion", (gen) "I give birth to")
an infectious agent, or more commonly germ, is a biological agent that causesdisease to its host. Foodborne illness (also foodborne disease and colloquially referred
to as food poisoning) is any illness resulting from the consumption of contaminated
food. There are two types of food poisoning: infectious agent and toxic agent. Food
infection refers to the presence of bacteria or other microbes which infect the body
after consumption. Food intoxication refers to the ingestion of toxins contained
within the food, including bacterially produced exotoxins, which can happen even
when the microbe that produced the toxin is no longer present or able to cause
infection. In spite of the common term food poisoning, most cases are caused by a
variety of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, rather
than chemical or natural toxins.
Foodborne pathogens continue to cause major public health problems
worldwide. These organisms are the leading causes of illness and death in less
developed countries, killing approximately 1.8 million people annually. In developedcountries Foodborne pathogens are responsible for millions of cases of infectious
gastrointestinal diseases each year, costing billions of dollars in medical care and lost
productivity. In addition, new Foodborne diseases are likely to emerge driven by
factors such as pathogen evolution, changes in agricultural and food manufacturing
practices, and changes to the human host status. A third problem is that there are
growing concerns that terrorists could use pathogens to contaminate food and water
supplies in attempts to incapacitate thousands of people and disrupt economic
growth. Fuelled by these concerns research into the genomics, molecular biology and
microbiology of the most important Food borne pathogens has escalated to
unprecedented levels in recent years.
Quality control (QC), which is a reactive system that focuses on legal
requirements and emphasizes statistically relevant measurements, quality assurance
(QA) is a preventive approach that emphasizes operational procedures. To establishQA/QC parameters, the food microbiologist uses two approaches. The first sets out to
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 3/25
3
determine the total load of microbes in a sample, and the second attempts to
determine the presence or absence of a particular microbial species, usually a
pathogen or related type used as their indicators. Thus, while the first type of
microbiological quality assurance test aims to establish that food products meet
statutory requirements, the second type of analysis is focused on public health
impacts with regulatory requirements as an integral part of the testing procedure. In
addition to the general testing requirements under QC programs, there has been an
added element of quality assurance that is being pursued vigorously under the
implementation of quality management systems such as Hazard Analysis & Critical
Control Points (HACCP) plans. To further enhance the utility of these systems, there
is a need to develop rapid microbiological detection techniques that are sensitive and
accurate. Accordingly, much effort has been devoted to shortening assay times and
to replacing the visible end results with alternative measurements.
Historically, the identification of such organisms has been done using
conventional culture methods and biochemical techniques. These methods, although
still considered by most to be the "gold standard" for microbial identification, can
often be time consuming, laborious and also complicated by the heterogeneous
nature of food microflora and the subjective nature of many microbiological and
biochemical techniques. Several bio-techniques are these days employed by
microbiologists to assure the safety of food products. These include electrical
methods such as impedance/conductance; chemical methods such as direct
epifluorescent filter technique (DEFT); bacterial adenosine triphosphate (ATP)
bioluminescence, flow cytometry, biosensors, and agglutination/immunological
assays; and nucleic acid technologies such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR),
ribotyping and microarrays. Nucleic acid technologies are being used increasingly
for quality assurance purposes. Such new methods have helped improve the
objectivity of test methods as well as reduce the time required to test many food
products.
DNA probe based methods have become increasingly popular in recent years.
The specific characteristics of any organism depend on the particular sequence of
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 4/25
4
the nucleic acid contained in its genome. The sequence of bases of nucleic acids
makes different organisms unique. Detection of such organism’s unique nucleic acid
sequence employing short specific nucleic acid fragments which are labelled helps
in indicating the presence or absence of that particular organism in the sample.
Fig. 1 Detection of nucleic acids by amplification
Genetic Probe
Genetic Probe is a fragment of DNA or RNA of variable length (usually 100-
1000 bases long), which is used in DNA or RNA samples to detect the presence of
such nucleotide sequences (the specific DNA target) that are complementary to the
sequence in the probe. A gene probe is composed of nucleic acid molecules, most
often double-stranded DNA. It consists of either an entire gene or a fragment of a
gene with a known function. Alternatively, short pieces of single-stranded DNA can
be synthesized, based on the nucleotide sequence of the known gene. These are
commonly referred to as oligonucleotides. Both natural and synthetic
oligonucleotides are used to detect complementary DNA or RNA targets in samples.
Double-stranded DNA probes must be denatured before the hybridization reaction;
oligonucleotide and RNA probes, which are single-stranded, do not need to bedenatured.
The physical basis for gene probe tests stems from the structure of DNA
molecules themselves. Usually, DNA is composed of two strands of nucleotide
polymers wound around each other to form a double helix. These long nucleotide
chains are held together by hydrogen bonds between specific pairs of nucleotides.
Adenine (A) in one strand binds to thymine (T) in the complementary strand.Similarly, guanine (G) in one strand forms a hydrogen bond with cytosine (C) in the
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 5/25
5
opposite strand. The hydrogen bonds holding the strands together can usually be
broken by raising the pH above 12 or the temperature above 95°C. Single-stranded
molecules result and the DNA is considered denatured. When the pH or temperature
is lowered, the hydrogen bonds are re-established between the AT and GC pairs,
reforming double-stranded DNA. The source of the DNA strands is inconsequential
as long as the strands are complementary. If the strands of the double helix are from
different sources, the molecules are called hybrids and the process is termed
hybridization. The probe thereby hybridizes to single-stranded nucleic acid (DNA or
RNA) whose base sequence allows probe-target base pairing due to complementarity
between the probe and target. The labeled probe is first denatured (by heating or
under alkaline conditions such as exposure to sodium hydroxide) into single DNA
strands and then hybridized to the target DNA (Southern blotting) or RNA (Northern
blotting) immobilized on a membrane or in situ
To detect hybridization of the probe to its target sequence, the probe is tagged
(or labelled) with a molecular marker of either radioactive or (more recently)
fluorescent molecules; commonly used markers are
32
P (a radioactive isotope of phosphorus incorporated into the phosphodiester bond in the probe DNA) or
Digoxigenin, (DIG labels) which is non-radioactive antibody-based marker. DNA
sequences or RNA transcripts that have moderate to high sequence similarity to the
probe are then detected by visualizing the hybridized probe via autoradiography or
other imaging techniques. Normally, either X-ray pictures are taken of the filter, or
the filter is placed under UV light. Detection of sequences with moderate or high
similarity depends on how stringent the hybridization conditions were applied —
high stringency, such as high hybridization temperature and low salt in
hybridization buffers, permits only hybridization between nucleic acid sequences
that are highly similar, whereas low stringency, such as lower temperature and high
salt, allows hybridization when the sequences are less similar. Hybridization probes
used in DNA microarrays refer to DNA covalently attached to an inert surface, such
as coated glass slides or gene chips, and to which a mobile cDNA target is
hybridized.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 6/25
6
Depending on the method the probe may be synthesized using
phosphoramidite method or generated and labeled by PCR amplification or cloning
(older methods). In order to increase the in vivo stability of the probe RNA is not
used, instead RNA analogues may be used, in particular morpholino. Molecular
DNA- or RNA-based probes are now routinely used in screening gene libraries,
detecting nucleotide sequences with blotting methods, and in other gene
technologies like microarrays.
History
The first commercially available nucleic acid probe-based assay, GENE-TRAK,
was introduced in 1985 for food analysis. This used Salmonella -specific DNA probes
(32P labelled) directed against chromosomal DNA to detect Salmonella in enriched
foods. Later, in 1988, they introduced non-isotopically labelled probes
for Salmonella, Listeria and E. coli based on targeting the ribosomal RNA. This type of
colorimetric hybridization assay is based on a liquid hybridization reaction between
the target rRNA and two separate DNA oligonucleotide probes (the capture probe
and reporter probe) that are specific for the organism of interest. The capture probe
molecules are extended enzymatically with a polymer of about 100 deoxyadenosine
monophosphate residues. The reporter probe molecules are labeled chemically with
hapten fluorscein. The GENE-TRAK microwell tests available today are used to
detect Salmonella and Listeria . Other commercially available nucleic acid probes
exist for the confirmation of Campylobacter, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria and
are marketed by Geneprobe. Initially, most such methods had limited utility owing to
the use of isotopic signal generating systems and complex assay formats. More
recently, however, a variety of format improvements and the development of more
sensitive nonradioactive detection methods have helped to broaden the application
of probe-based methods
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 7/25
7
Target Selection
The first step in developing a gene probe assay is to decide what information is
needed. If a particular taxonomic group is to be identified, the probe must be
directed toward a gene or region of a gene that is conserved throughout a particular
species or genus. On the other hand, one may want to know if a microorganism
carrying a particular gene is present. Probes to specific determinants of virulence are
useful in assessing a risk to public health posed by bacterial contamination.
Table 1 lists probes that have been used or are of potential use for detecting bacterial
pathogens in foods. In the section, "Probes and Their Targets," the development of
each probe is described briefly along with what is known about the probe target andits significance. The first probes designed to detect all members of a taxonomic
group were constructed by screening randomly cloned DNA fragments. As data on
the evolution of ribosomal RNA nucleotide sequences accumulate, probes are being
directed toward these targets. Conserved regions can be used to identify large taxons,
whereas the variable regions may be unique for a particular genus or species.
Furthermore, as a cell contains more than 1000 copies of ribosomal RNA, test
sensitivity is increased, because fewer cells are required to produce a positive signal.
Probe Specificity
The relatively short length of synthetic oligonucleotide probes means that they
are specific for particular regions of DNA. There is only about 1 chance in 15,000
that a sequence length of 18 bases would appear more than once in
the E. coli genome. With a 22-base probe, the chance drops to about 1 in 4 million.
To avoid mismatches that reduce specificity, filter washings are conducted at high
stringency so that a single base-pair difference between target and probe could not
result in hybridization and produce a negative result. Such changes occur as the
result of rare mutations. The use of two non-overlapping probes would significantly
reduce the probability of false negatives.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 8/25
8
Construction of Probes
Recombinant DNA techniques have made gene probes possible. Probe tests
require preparations of relatively pure, specific segments of DNA. The first probes
were obtained by inserting these regions into plasmids and transforming the
plasmids into the appropriate host cells to increase the amount of probe DNA.
Plasmids were purified, and in some cases the inserted fragments were isolated.
These cloned, natural DNA probes served quite well, although a considerable
amount of effort was required for their production and purification. Through the
development of DNA sequencing and automated oligonucleotide synthesis, short(18-30 bases) DNA probes were produced in the laboratory by chemical means. The
ready availability of probes considerably expanded their use and application.
Table 1. Some gene probes used to detect pathogenic bacteria in foods
Bacteria Target(a)
Campylobacter jejuni r-RNA
Escherichia coli Heat-stable toxin (ST)
Heat-labile toxin (LT)Shiga-like toxin
Invasive genes
O157: H7
Listeria species r- RNA
L. monocytogenes Listeriolysin O
Major secreted polypeptide (msp)
Salmonella species r-RNA
Shigella species Invasive genes
Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxin B
Vibrio cholera Cholera toxin
V. parahymolyticus Thermostable direct haemolysin (tdh)
V. vulnificus Cytotoxin- hemolysin
Yersinia en terocolitica Cytotoxicity/ Sereny
Inavasive gene (ail)
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Invasive gene
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 9/25
9
Probe Labeling
For probes consisting of cloned DNA fragments, the nick translation method
for labeling DNA with radioactivity is very popular. Cloned DNA can also be labeled
by a random priming technique. Several kits to perform these reactions are
commercially available; however, these techniques are unsatisfactory for labeling
short oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotide probes are usually labeled on the 5' end
with 32P, using bacteriophage T4 polynucleotide kinase and gamma-AT 32P.
Although radioactive gene probes seem to have the greatest sensitivity in colony
hybridization procedures, they are a potential biohazard, and disposal of radioactive
waste can be expensive.Many schemes are being examined for the nonradioactive labeling of gene probes.
Some of these techniques have been incorporated into commercial tests designed to
signal the presence or absence of a particular gene. For example, alkaline
phosphatase has been conjugated to synthetic oligonucleotides without affecting the
kinetics or specificity of the hybridization reaction.
Colorimetric DNA probe hybridization (DNA Probe Test- Dip stick format)
The probes used in this test consist of a mixture of capture probes and
detector probes. The capture probes contain two specific binding regions. The first
region contains a Salmonella- specific nucleic acid sequence. The second region
contains a polydeoxyadenylate tail. This serves to link the probe target complex to a
polydeoxythymidylatecoated solid support. Similarly, the detector probes alsocontain Salmonella-specific sequences. These sequences are labeled with fluorescein
groups that serve to bind an antibody-enzyme conjugate to the immobilized probe-
target complex. After removal of all of the excess reactants and cellular debris, the
plastic dipstick containing the immobilized probe-target complex is added to a
substrate-chromogen mixture in order to generate a highly colored product when
Salmonella is present in the original test sample (Fig.1). Hence indicating the
presence or absence of pathogen in the sample.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 10/25
10
In recent years, several genetic amplification techniques have been developed,
with polymerase chain reaction and its variants — nested PCR, reverse transcriptase
(RT) PCR and multiplex PCR — emerging as a biotechnique of choice in the food
industry. PCR involves detection of specific gene fragments by in-vitro enzymatic
amplification of the target DNA, followed by detection of the amplified DNA
molecule by electrophoresis, ELISA or other techniques. The PCR method is a highly
specific and sensitive method allowing the detection of low numbers of
microorganisms. In the past, the general limitations of the technique have included
difficulty in obtaining specific DNA primers and production of nonspecific PCR
products. Also, organisms that have been killed during processing were not
recognized as dead if their DNA was still present, thus giving false-positive reactions.
Automation and improvements in PCR systems have addressed some of these
problems and made the technique an extremely attractive option. Currently, there
are several manufacturers producing PCR-based test methods for the detection of
foodborne pathogens, including the BAX System Assays for Screening (DuPont
Qualicon, USA) forSalmonella, Listeria
, andE.coli
O157; Roche DiagnosticsLightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, USA); Probelia (Sanofi-Pasteur, France)
for Salmonella and Listeria , Genevision for Listeria monocytogenes,
Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 (Warnex, Canada), and TaqMan (Perkin Elmer,
USA) for Salmonella.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 11/25
11
Fig.2 A schematic representation of the steps required to detect Salmonella using the DNA probe test
Colony Hybridization
DNA hybridization tests may be performed in many ways. One format, the
colony hybridization assay, will be described here. Generally, an aliquot of a
homogenized food is spread-plated on an appropriate agar. After incubation, the
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 12/25
12
colonial pattern is transferred to a solid support (usually a membrane or paper filter)
by pressing the support onto the agar surface. Next, the cells are lysed in situ by a
combination of high pH and temperature (0.5 M NaOH and/or steam or microwave
irradiation), which also denatures and affixes the DNA to the support. The solid
support with the attached target DNA is incubated with a 32P- or enzyme-labeled
probe. The labeled probe DNA that fails to reform the double helix is removed by
washing the probe-target complexes on the support at an appropriate temperature
and salt concentration.
Great care must be taken to ensure that the washing temperature is correct;
this parameter is usually determined empirically. If the temperature of the washingsolution is too high, all the hydrogen bonds between the probe and target may be
broken, producing a false-negative result. If the washing temperature is too low,
strands of DNA will not match up accurately, and non complementary strands may
be formed, leading to a false-positive outcome. If the temperature allows only
accurately rejoined strands to remain together, the conditions are termed "high
stringency." If the temperature is too low, so that mismatched strands exist, the
stringency is low. For a review of hybridization using solid supports, Meinkoth and
Wahl.
The radioactive probe DNA that is bound to the target on the support is often
detected by autoradiography. An X-ray film is placed over the support. Radioactive
decays expose the film, so that when it is developed, black spots appear where cells
are harboring the same gene as the probe (Fig. 2). If an enzyme-labeled probe is
used, a chromogenic substrate is added. Where the probe-associated enzyme ispresent, a colored spot will develop. Each spot represents a bacterial colony that has
arisen from a single cell. The number of cells harboring the target gene in the
original sample can be calculated by multiplying the number of spots by the dilution
factor.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 13/25
13
Fig. 3. Colony Hybridization Assay
Aliquot of homogenized sample is spread-plated on appropriate medium (cross-
hatched area) and incubated until colonies are formed. Colonies are transferred by
gentle contact to solid support such as a filter (hatched area). Colony cells are lysed
in situ by high pH and/or steam or microwave irradiation, which immobilizes
single-stranded target DNA. Filters are then incubated with a labeled gene probe. (In
this figure, a radioactive label was used.) Unbound probe is removed by washing thefilter at a temperature that allows well-matched double strands to remain joined;
poorly matched strands are separated. If DNA from a colony contains the same
genetic information as the probe, that area of the filter will become radioactive.
Radioactivity is observed as a dark spot on an X-ray film. Count the spots to calculate
the number of cells containing specific gene present in the original sample.
The Polymerase Chain Reaction
Nucleic acid amplification techniques have an enormous range of
applications and have become an indispensible tool in molecular biology and
powerful rapid screening method in the detection of food borne pathogens. By
targeting and amplifying (or making copies of) DNA sequences in vitro , it has been
possible to detect the presence of specific DNA sequences with sensitivities down to a
single target copy per reaction, and in many cases quantify the results. PCR is a
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 14/25
14
method for the amplification of double or single stranded (ss) DNA sequences in
vitro (Erlich, H.A et.al., 1989). The reaction proceeds in response to temperature
driven steps of double stranded (ds) DNA denaturation, primer or ss oligonucleotide
annealing to complementary ss target DNA sequences, and DNA polymerase
extension. These steps are repeated, and under appropriate conditions will generate
a doubling of the initial number of target copy sequences with each cycle. The
primers define the 5’ ends of the discrete products that are subsequently formed.
Three step PCRs use three individual temperature steps for denaturation, annealing,
and extension, while two step PCRs use a combined annealing and extension step.
Reaction reagents typically include a thermostable DNA polymerase,
deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), user selected primers for targeting
specific sequences, magnesium chloride, and template or target DNA. The process is
rapid, requiring between minutes and hours to generate enough discrete sized target
sequences for detection; a single thermal cycle may require as little as a few seconds
to complete. The length of time required for a reaction is typically a function of
variables such as the length of the target sequence and the heating and cooling rates
of the thermal cycler used.
However, it is now possible to find PCR systems capable of thermal cycling
speeds so fast that decreasing cycle time further would not be worthwhile without
first finding a DNA polymerase capable of working faster than those currently in
use. While it is possible for PCR to routinely detect low copy numbers in a reaction,
many reactions use between 5 and 10 μl sample volumes, yielding a lower detection
limit of close to 103 CFU/ml. Among the expanding array of nucleic acid
amplification techniques, PCR remains the most popular method, presumably as a
result of its cost and ease of use and has been used extensively for the detection of
food borne pathogens. By the early 1990s numerous primer sets had been developed
for the detection of pathogens and the food industry had gained interest in this
powerful method. The amplification of nucleic acids for detection purposes is
usually just one step of a procedure that involves assay design and sample
preparation prior to amplification, followed by specificity and sensitivity analysis.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 15/25
15
Fig. 4 Representation of PCR and Detection Procedures
The advent of gene probe techniques has allowed the development of powerful
tests by which particular bacterial strains can be rapidly identified without the need
for isolating pure cultures (Rasmussen et al., 1994; Cohen et al, 1993). The
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technique for in vitro amplification of specific
segments of DNA by using a pair of primers (Nguyen et al., 1994). A million-fold
amplication of a particular region can often be realized, allowing, among a myriad of
other uses, the sensitive detection of specific genes in samples. PCR can be used toamplify genes specific to taxonomic groups of bacteria and also to detect genes
involved in the virulence of food-borne bacteria (Finlay & Falkow, 1988; Bej et al,
1994). The recently developed techniques for amplifying specific DNA sequences in
vitro allow the detection of very small amounts of target DNA in various specimens.
Theoretically these procedures can detect even one molecule of target DNA. By
amplifying a sequence that is unique to the pathogenic micro-organism of interest,
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 16/25
16
the in vitro amplification methods can be used to indirectly detect extremely low
concentrations of microbes.
However, provided that PCR products are handled carefully and that real-
time quantification is not necessary, traditional PCR techniques can be used with great
success for the detection of food pathogens. A single enrichment, thermal cycling
protocol, set of PCR reagent components and concentrations were used for the
detection of 13 foodborne pathogens by Wang et al. Agarose gel electrophoresis on
2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide was used for separation of PCR
products. The PCR detection limits reported ranged from 2 to 5 X 104 cells for E. coli
O157:H7 and Shigella spp., respectively. A review of PCR has been published. PCR hasbeen used to detect enteroinvasive E. coli and Shigella spp., V . Vulnificus , Hepatitis A
virus and V . cholerae in foods.
Food-borne pathogen identification is an important aspect of human health
care. PCR methods have been developed for the identification of Salmonella pathogens
(Hill, 1996; Jones et al., 1993; Tsen et al., 1994). PCR is an effective, rapid, reliable and
sensitive technique for the detection of fimA gene of Salmonella strains (Cohen et al.,
1993). Here, the primers selected were completely internal to the fimA gene, which
meant that all non-Salmonella strains responded negatively to the amplicon of the
fimA gene, making this a promising diagnostic tool for sensitivity and specificity.
Real Time PCR
The ability to monitor amplicon accumulation as a reaction proceeds has
drastically improved the field of nucleic acid detection. In addition to facilitating the
quantification of initial target copy numbers, real-time PCR allows an operator to
evaluate product specificity without opening the reaction chamber, saving time, and
reducing carry-over contamination risk. Real-time PCR systems offer a wide range of
capabilities. These include the ability to handle thousands of samples per day, perform
35 thermal cycles in under 40 minutes, and detect initial target copy numbers over a
range from 10 to 1010. The design of real-time PCR assays has been aided by
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 17/25
17
commercially available software packages that can determine optimal primer, probe,
and reaction conditions, given a specific sequence of interest. Real-time PCR assays
are typically designed to target short DNA fragments using primers specifically
selected to avoid the formation of primer dimers. The increase in fluorescence in
response to amplicon formation is generally accomplished in one of two ways:
through the use of a nonspecific dsDNA binding, or by sequence specific probes that
generate a signal only in the presence of the target DNA sequence. Realtime PCR
techniques and applications have been reviewed extensively and experimental
comparisons among instrumentation and assay formats have been performed to
compare sensitivities. A large number of real-time PCR strategies that are based on
fluorescene increases in response to sequence specific detection have also been
developed. Probe based real-time PCR techniques are advantageous over the use of
nonspecific dsDNA binding dyes in that they may not require analysis of PCR
amplicon melting temperatures for product specificity — fluorescence generation is a
function of the probe binding to a specific sequence of DNA. In the case of real-time
PCR development with probe based systems, excitation and emission wavelengths of
the fluorophores selected must be kept in consideration.
Sequence specific chemistries that have been incorporated into real-time PCR
assays include those based on a sequence specific probe and DNA polymerase
exonuclease activity, molecular beacons, and self-quenched hairpin primers. One
real-time PCR chemistry (TaqMan®) that has been used extensively for the detection
of foodborne pathogens relies upon the 5’ exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase.
A probe containing a reporter and quencher in close proximity to one another
binds to a target region between the two primers which define the ends of the
discrete fragment ultimately formed. This probe is cleaved by the 5’ exonuclease
activity of a DNA polymerase, separating the fluorophores and quencher, generating
increases in fluorescence as a direct result of specific probe binding and target
fragment extension (Figure 1.2). Numerous assays have been developed with this
chemistry. Molecular beacons are stem and loop oligonucleotides structures used for
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 18/25
18
sequence specific detection. The loop portion contains a sequence that is
complementary to a chosen target, while the stem portion contains a short sequence
of bases at the 3’ and 5’ ends that are complementary to one another but not the
target.(Fig. 4) Fluorescence and quenching moieties are attached to the ends of the
beacon. The beacons are designed such that with no loop complementary sequence
present the stem structure is stable, but in the presence of a complementary target
sequence the arms of the stem separate. This separation changes the conformation of
the beacon to a more stable structure, allowing simultaneous separation of the
fluorophore and quencher, leading to fluorescence generation. Molecular beacons
have been used in numerous applications, outside of monitoring specific amplicon
formation in real-time PCR. Molecular beacons have been used in multiplex PCR
applications for the simultaneous detection of four pathogenic retroviruses and
fourV. cholerae genes.
Reverse Transcriptase PCR
Enrichment procedures have successfully been used for the sensitive detection
of viable foodborne pathogens, but this technique is time consuming, as it is a
function of the target organisms growth. While PCR is capable of detecting low
levels of target
Fig. 4 (A) Molecular beacon stem-loop conformation that forms by intramolecular base pairing when in
solution without the presence of complementary target nucleic acid. (B) When in the presence of target DNA
or RNA, the molecular beacon unfolds because the bases comprising the loop (probe) region form more
numerous and more stable base pairs than those allowing the stem-loop secondary structure to form. A single
base mismatch between the target nucleic acid and the probe portion drastically decreases stability of
molecular beacon interaction and may preclude it altogether.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 19/25
19
DNA, DNA detection does not provide information regarding the viability of a cell;
food processing may destroy bacteria while leaving behind DNA and this DNA may
be present even if its host cell is no longer alive. On the other hand, RNA is easily
destroyed, which makes it suitable for determining organism viability. Reverse
transcriptase PCR of mRNA targets has demonstrated that these molecules are
indicators of cell viability. Following RNA purification and degradation of
contaminating DNA from a sample of interest, RNA is reverse transcribed and the
synthesized complementary DNA or cDNA may be amplified as is typically done for
any DNA target. Reverse transcriptase PCR has been used successfully for the
detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens55 and viruses. A real-time reverse
transcription PCR assay using a TaqMan minor grove binding probe was
implemented for the quantitative detection of H5 avian influenza down to 100 target
copies.
Microarray Detection
In the past several years, a new technology, called DNA microarray, has
attracted tremendous interests among biologists and offers much in the way of high
throughput analysis of virulence gene expression in food associated pathogenic
bacteria. This technology promises to monitor the whole genome on a single chip so
that researchers can have a better picture of the interactions among thousands of
genes simultaneously. An array is an orderly arrangement of samples. It provides a
medium for matching known and unknown DNA samples based on base-pairing
rules and automating the process of identifying the unknowns. An array experiment
can make use of common assay systems such as microplates or standard blotting
membranes, and can be created by hand or make use of robotics to deposit the
sample. In general, arrays are described as macroarrays or microarrays , the
difference being the size of the sample spots. Macroarrays contain sample spot sizes
of about 300 microns or larger and can be easily imaged by existing gel and blot
scanners. The sample spot sizes in microarrays are typically less than 200 microns in
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 20/25
20
diameter and these arrays usually contains thousands of spots. Microarrays require
specialized robotics and imaging equipment that generally are not commercially
available as a complete system (Fig. 5)
In addition to Southern blots, gel electrophoresis, melting temperature
analysis with nonspecific dsDNA binding dyes, and probe based amplification
detection, microarrays have been used to analyze the specificity of PCR products.
DNA microarray technology (aka DNA chips or gene chips) involves the placement
of user defined oligonucleotides probes in specific locations on a solid substrate such
as glass. Following hybridization of target DNA sequences to probes anchored on a
chip’s surface, fluorescence detection can be used to monitor binding events.
Depending on the sensitivity required, microarrays can be used with or without
upstream amplification steps. Software analysis of large data sets that are generated
greatly facilitates the process of data analysis.
The advantages and limitations of several microarray software packages have
been reviewed. Microarrays may be an effective way of distinguishing between
nonspecific and target product formation and therefore this detection strategy may
allow the use of more primers in a multiplex PCR assay than would normally be
possible. Amplification methods have been used in combination with microarray
technology for the detection of E. coli O157:H7.77 Wilson et al.78 were able to
specifically detect 18 pathogenic microorganisms including, prokaryotes,
eukaryotes, and viruses using PCR in combination with a microarray containing over
50,000 probes and with a detection limit as low as 10 fg of DNA.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 21/25
21
Fig. 5 DNA microarray showing the steps in preparing oligonucleotide fragments that are subsequently
probed using complementary sequences for quantitative large-scale, high throughput screening of geneexpression using fluorescence.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
FISH is a technique for the probe-based identification of nucleic acids without
amplification. The technique can be used to specifically identify microbial cells in
environmental samples and rRNA molecules are frequently targeted. Fluorescently
labeled probes can be used to generate signals in the presence of specific targetsequences, seen with fluorescence microscopy. Typical steps include sample
preparation by fixation and permeabilisation, probe binding, removal of
unhybridized probes by washing, and flow cytometry or microscopy detection. A
FISH technique for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes showed specific detection
of the target microorganism and detection was possible in sheep milk samples.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 22/25
22
Description of Probes and Their Development
The design and construction of gene probes requires careful scientific
experimentation and a series of complex decisions. A first step is to determine if the
gene probe is to be targeted to a particular pathogenic strain or to an entire
taxonomic group. A target must be chosen so that all of the microorganisms to be
detected contain such a gene. For probes designed to detect all members of a genus
or species, ribosomal RNA has been a popular target because it contains both
conserved and variable regions. If a pathogenic strain is sought, a probe is usually targeted to a virulence factor gene responsible for causing disease. A considerable
amount of research is needed to identify the genes involved and the role they play in
pathogenesis.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 23/25
23
References:
1. Donta, S.T., M. King, and K. Sloper. 1994. Induction of steroido-genesis in tissue
culture by cholerae enterotoxin. Nature New Biol. 243:246-247.
2. Erlich, H.A., R. Gibbs, and H.H. Kazazian, Jr., Eds. 1989. Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
3. Feinberg, A.P., and B. Vogelstein. 1983. A technique for radiolabeling DNA
restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132:6-
13.
4. Field, M., L. Graf, W. Laird, and P. Smith. 1978. Heat stable enterotoxin of
Escherichia coli : in vitro effects on guanylate cyclase activity, cyclic GMP
concentration and ion transport in small intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
75:2800-2804.
5. Hill, W.E., W.L. Payne, G. Zon, and S.L. Moseley. 1985. Synthetic
oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes for detecting heat-stable enterotoxin-producing
Escherichia coli by DNA colony hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50:1187-
1191.
6. Hill, W.E., B.A. Wentz, W.L. Payne, J.A. Jagow, and G. Zon. 1986. DNA colony
hybridization method using synthetic oligonucleotides to detect enterotoxigenic
Escherichia coli : collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 69:531-536.
7. Hill, W.E., S.P. Keasler, M.W. Trucksess, P. Feng, C.A. Kaysner, and K.A. Lampel. 1991.
Polymerase chain reaction identification of Vibrio vulnificus in artificially
contaminated oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:707-711.
8. Jablonski, E., E.W. Moomaw, R.H. Tullis, and J.L. Ruth. 1986. Preparation of
oligodeoxynucleotide--alkaline phosphatase conjugates and their use of
hybridization probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:6115-6128.
9. Keller, G.H., and M.M. Manak. 1989. DNA probes. Stockton Press, New York.
10. Leong, J., A.C. Vinal, and W.S. Dallas. 1985. Nucleotide sequence comparison
between heat-labile toxin B-subunit cistrons from Escherichia coli of human and
porcine origin. Infect. Immun. 48:73-77.
11. Lampel, K.A., J.A. Jagow, M.L. Troxell, S. Tucker, and A.T. Maurelli. 1995. An
oligonucleotide probe for the detection of enteroinvasive Escherichia coli andShigella spp. in foods. (Submitted for publication.)
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 24/25
24
12. Maurelli, A.T., B. Baudry, H. d'Hauteville, T.L. Hale, and P.J. Sansonetti. 2003. Cloning
of plasmid DNA sequences involved in invasion of HeLa cells by Shigella flexneri .
Infect. Immun. 49:164-171.
13. Meinkoth, J., and G. Wahl. 1984. Hybridization of nucleic acids immunobilized onsolid supports. Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284.
14. Picken, R.N., Z. Wang, and H.L. Yang. 1987. Molecular cloning of species-specific
DNA probe for Campylobacter jejuni . Mol. Cell. Probes 1:245-259
15. Rambabu Naravaneni and Kaiser Jamil 2005. Rapid detection of food-borne
pathogens by using molecular techniques Journal of Medical Microbiology (2005),
54, 51 – 54.
16. Rigby, P.W.J., M. Dieckmann, C. Rhodes, and P. Berg. 1977. Labelingdeoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA
polymerase I. J. Mol. Biol. 113:237-251.
17. Saiki, R.K., S. Scharf, F. Faloona, K.B. Mullis, G.T. Horn, and H.A. Erlich. 1985.
Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequence and restriction analysis
for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350-1354.
18. Saiki, R.K., D.H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S.J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G.T. Horn, K.B. Mullis, and
H.A. Erlich. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with athermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487-491.
19. Rashtchian, A., M.A. Abbott, and M. Shaffer. 1987. Cloning and characterization of
genes coding for ribosomal RNA in Campylobacter jejuni . Curr. Microbiol. 14:311-
317.
20. Rashtchian, A., J. Eldredge, M. Ottaviani, M. Abbott, G. Mock, D. Lovern, J. Klinger,
and G. Parsons. 1987. Immunological capture of nucleic acid hybrids and
application to nonradioactive DNA probe assay. Clin. Chem. 33:1526-1530.
21. Sansonetti, P.J., D.J. Kopecko, and S.B. Formal. 1981. Shigella soneii plasmids:
evidence that a large plasmid is necessary for virulence. Infect. Immun. 34:75-83.
22. S. Kumar, K. Balakrishna, G.P. Singh and H.V. Batra 2005; Rapid detection of
Salmonella typhi in foods by combination of immunomagnetic separation and
polymerase chain reaction, World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology (2005)
21:625 – 628
23. Sansonetti, P.J., D.J. Kopecko, and S.B. Formal. 1982. Involvement of a plasmid in the
invasive ability of Shigella flexneri . Infect. Immun. 35:852-860.
8/2/2019 Detection Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/detection-final 25/25
24. Small, P.L.C., and S. Falkow. 1988. Identification of regions on a 230 kilobase
plasmid from enteroinvasive Escherichia coli that are required for entry into HEp-2
cells. Infect. Immun. 56:225-229.
25. Watson, J.D., N.H. Hopkins, J.W. Roberts, J.A. Steitz, and A.M. Weiner. 1987.Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th ed., Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
26. Yamamoto, T., T.A. Tamura, M. Ryoji, A. Kaji, T. Yokota, and T. Takano. 1982.
Sequence analysis of the heat labile enterotoxin subunit B gene originating in
human enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli . J. Bacteriol. 152:506-509.