Details of Alternate Alignment Study for the Project Highway Sl. No Parameters/Issues Option 1 Greenfield Alignment Remarks Option 2 Brownfield Alignment Remarks 1 Length (km) 162.126 185.459 2 Total land acquired (ha) 1411.67 1018.71 Govt. land (ha) 114.60 169.72 Pvt. Land (ha) 1297.07 848.99 Forest land (ha)* Nil 8.42 3 Area under protected/ important or sensitive species of flora or fauna/Wildlife Sanctuary The alignment does not pass through any wild life sanctuary, protected area and its eco sensitive zone. The alignment does not pass through any wild life sanctuary, protected area and its eco sensitive zone. 4 No. of trees 2446 nos 4551 nos. 5 Impact on flora and fauna 2446 nos. of tree are coming along the proposed alignment. 4551 nos. of tree are coming along the proposed alignment. 6 Area under water bodies (ha)* 6.67 Ha 1.53 Ha. 7 No. of structure to be impacted due to proposed alignment 36 nos. 846 nos. 8 No. of families 2615 nos. 4536 nos. 9 No. of structure to be constructed 1. MJB – 9 nos. 2. MNB – 51 nos. 1. MJB - 9 2. MNB - 63
3
Embed
Details of Alternate Alignment Study for the Project Highwayenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/04_Jan_2019... · Details of Alternate Alignment Study for the Project
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Details of Alternate Alignment Study for the Project Highway
Sl. No
Parameters/Issues Option 1 Greenfield Alignment
Remarks Option 2 Brownfield Alignment
Remarks
1 Length (km) 162.126 185.459
2 Total land acquired (ha) 1411.67 1018.71
Govt. land (ha) 114.60
169.72
Pvt. Land (ha) 1297.07 848.99
Forest land (ha)* Nil 8.42
3 Area under protected/ important or sensitive species of flora or fauna/Wildlife Sanctuary
The alignment does not pass through any wild life sanctuary, protected area and its eco sensitive zone.
The alignment does not pass through any wild life sanctuary, protected area and its eco sensitive zone.
4 No. of trees 2446 nos 4551 nos.
5 Impact on flora and fauna
2446 nos. of tree are coming along the proposed alignment.
4551 nos. of tree are coming along the proposed alignment.
6 Area under water bodies (ha)*
6.67 Ha 1.53 Ha.
7 No. of structure to be impacted due to proposed alignment
Based on the above study the following observations are there:- 1. Option 2 leads to major impact on flora and fauna as more number of trees are falling under the alignment.
2. Option 2 leads to more impact on structure and families as number affected families are high as compared to option 1. If alignment option 2 is followed then it will leads to more impacts on Environment & Social components, hence Option 1 is followed. The
map showing alternatives site on Survey of India toposheet is given below:-