Top Banner
Destruction of Alberta’s Boreal Forests and Waters By Tar Sands Developments D. W. Schindler Area, thousands km2 Alberta 662 France 505 Sweden 450 Norway 386 Germany 357 UK 249 Oil Sands 140 Greece 131
29

Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Feb 12, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Destruction of Alberta’s

Boreal Forests and Waters

By Tar Sands Developments

D. W. Schindler

Area, thousands km2

Alberta 662

France 505

Sweden 450

Norway 386

Germany 357

UK 249

Oil Sands 140

Greece 131

Page 2: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Tar Sands Extraction- Major

Environmental Issues

• CO2 emissions

• Water removal

Water pollution- PAHs, Mercury, Arsenic, etc. etc

• Lack of reclamation

• Boreal forest destruction

• Biodiversity loss

• Air pollution problems

• Violation of First Nations subsistence space

• Lack of cumulative effects assessment

• Incompetent monitoring

Page 3: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 4: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Wooded Fen

Bayley, 2004

Page 5: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Oil Sands-

Scraping Bottom?National Geographic Mar 2009

Page 6: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 7: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

We need to get the message out….!

Page 8: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Feb-Mar 2008

Samples of snow

taken from 31 sites.

Athabasca River and its

tributaries sampled at 37 sites,

upstream and downstream of

development.

June-Aug 2008

Samples of Atha. R. and its

tributaries at 47 sites.

A study deliberately

designed to test the

contributions of

natural sources of

contaminants vs.

industry

Page 9: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

March 2007 Athabasca River looking north (downstream)

Page 10: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

• Based on two reports from the 1970’s/early 1980’s, emissions of large amounts of particulates & metals have likely been occurring for about 30 years and perhaps since the late 1960s.

• Contaminants in snow have not been reported since.

Page 11: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

MU 3

Snow profile,

Muskeg River,

March 2008

Snow was

sampled at 31

sites, representing

four months of

deposition.

Snow Results

Page 12: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Unimpacted

Site AR1

Impacted

Site AR6, near upgraders.

Note oil on surface of

snow water.Melted Snow

Page 13: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

226 km

4 21 6 2 3 20 24 43 26 49 28

1

6

18

12 8

32

38

74 km

38 6

25

23

1110

20

17

12 14 12

8

25

9

14

10 2146

5218

900 mL filtered

@ each site

Fort

McMurrayFort

Chipewyan

SYNCRUDE

MILDRED

LAKE

& SUNCOR

ALBIAN SANDS &

SYNCRUDE AURORA

CNRL

SUNCOR

STEEPBANK/

MILLENNIUM

SHELL

Bitumount

Fort

MacKay

White filters used for filtering melted snow samples. March 2008

Page 14: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Airborne contaminants

were detected within

A 50 km radius of

upgraders at site AR6.

Kelly et al. 2009. Proc.

U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci.

106: 22346-22351.

impacted

background

Page 15: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Total PAH

0 5 10 15 20

AR1

AR2

AR16

AR4

AR6

AR7

AR8

AR15

AR9

AR10

AR18

AR12

Particulate

Dissolved

Athabasca River

Beaver River

BE1 BE2 BE3

0

2

4

6

Ells River

EL1 EL2 EL3

0

2

6

7

Tar River

TR1 TR2 TR3

0

2

6

7

Joslyn Creek

JOC1

0

2

6

7

Steepbank River

ST3 ST2 ST1

0

2

4

6

Muskeg River

MU3 MU2 MU1

0

2

4

6

Firebag River

FR3 FR2 FR1

0

2

6

7

Snowpack on river

March 2008(ppm)

Fort

McMurray

Fort Chipewyan

Fort MacKay

Bitumount

Suncor

Steepbank/

Millennium

Syncrude

Mildred

Lake &

Suncor

Albian

Sands &

Syncrude

Aurora

Shell

CNRL

Fig 8

Page 16: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Total Mercury

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

AR1

AR2

AR16

AR4

AR6

AR7

AR8

AR15

AR9

AR10

AR18

AR12

Athabasca River

Beaver River

BE1 BE2 BE3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Ells River

EL1 EL2 EL3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Tar River

TR1 TR2 TR3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Joslyn Creek

JOC1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Steepbank River

ST3 ST2 ST1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Muskeg River

MU3 MU2 MU1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Firebag River

FR3 FR2 FR1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Snowpack on river

March 2008(ppt)

Particulate

Dissolved

Fort

McMurray

Fort Chipewyan

Fort MacKay

Bitumount

Suncor

Steepbank/

Millennium

Syncrude

Mildred

Lake &

Suncor

Albian

Sands &

Syncrude

Aurora

Shell

CNRL

Fig 12

Page 17: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Ar

se

nic

Environment Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory also

shows high and increasing emissions of many toxic substances.

3X increase in 4 years

NPRI airborne emissions from the oil sands industry

Year

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Me

rcu

ry (

kg

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Mercury

3X in 7 years

Page 18: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Conclusions

• Our results show that the oil sands industry is adding substantial amounts of contaminants to the Athabasca River

– Both airborne and waterborne pathways contribute.

– Most of the elements on the USEPA’s priority pollutant list were higher within a 50 km radius of upgraders.

• Environment Canada’s NPRI data also show that large quantities of toxins are emitted by the oilsands industry’s

• upgraders.

• OILSANDSGATE: The oilsands industry’s public claims about contaminant release, water use and reclamation are not true.

• The evidence from our study and NPRI indicates that oilsands companies should be charged under the Fisheries Act,

section 36(3), discharge of deleterious substances to fish-bearing waters. (Where is Environment Canada?)

Page 19: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Aquifers?

PAHs?

As?

Hg?

Page 20: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Fragmentation Impacts

Satellite image of in situ oil sands

exploration

Schematic of proportion of forest

impacted with 200m zone of disturbance

Page 21: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Next slide shows simulation of future development footprint based development

of existing leases

Page 22: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 23: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

“Boreal caribou will not persist for more than two to

four decades without immediate and aggressive

management intervention…Tough choices need to be

made between the management imperative to recover

boreal caribou and plans for ongoing bitumen

development and industrial land-use."

-panel of academic, government and industry

ecologists, February 2010

Courtesy: Wayne Lynch

Page 24: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 25: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

Wolverine

Marten

Fisher

Coyote

Page 26: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 27: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 28: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF
Page 29: Destruction of Alberta’s - WWF Norway - Velkommen til WWF

cpaws