ReportNo.FAA;RO'76-66 DESIGNANDCONSTRUCTION OFAIRPORTPAVEMENTS
ONEXPANSIVESOILS R.GOROONMcKEEN )WEe LI'RA'v . 1 ~ t 7 6JUNE1976
FinalReport Documentisavai labletothepublicthroughthe -,I
~NationalTechnicalInformationService, Springfield,Virginia22161. r
Preparedfor u.s.DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION
FEDERALAVIATIONADMINISTRATION SystemsResearch&
DevelopmentService Washington,D.C.20590 NOTICE
Thisdocumentisdisseminatedunderthesponsorshipof
theDepartmentofTransportationintheinterestofinformationexchange.TheUnitedStatesGovernmertassumesno
liabilityforitscontentsorusethereof..
TechnicalReportDocumentationPage 3.Recipient $CatalogNo.1.ReportNo.
2.GoYer"me,,'AccessionNo. FAA-RD-76-66
-----..-1...--------------+--.5-."R-epo;ti>.;;;- ----- --- ---
-._- .-----June1976 DESIGNANDCONSTRUCTIONOFAIRPORT
6.PerformingO,goni zarianCode PAVEMENTSONEXPANSIVESOILS
f----..----------:-:------i1--:-__--;-:- ---1 8
.PerformingOrgonlzationReportNo. 1_Author' .J R.GordonMcKeen
CERFAP-18
1-------------------------1--:-=---:------------19.PerlormingOrg...ilo';onNome...dAddress10.Wo,kUnitNo.(TRAISJ
EricH.WangCivilEngineeringResearchFacility, \-;-;--:=__--::-_.,.,--
--1 11.Con
floe'orG,ontNo.UniversityofNewr1exico,Box25,DOTFA75!.iAI-531 Univ.
ersityStation,Albuquerque,Nt187131
J3.TypeofRepprtondPeriodCo"eredIf: Of Afdransporta ti
011-----------.Fi na 1Report Federal'
AviationAdministrationApril1975- ;larchlJ76 SystemsResearch&
DevelopmentSHvi ce14. Code . .:::-C.:.-.L-.. _
15.SupplementaryNotes
1---:-,,---:------------------------------------16.Abstract A
literaturereview\vasconductecto'lrovidetilebestavailable
fordesigningairportpavementssoils.areasstudled
includedidentificationandclasSlflcatlon
settingofacceptablelevelsofteave,andthedeslgnofstablllzedsOll
,layers.r-1ethodsofidentificaticnandclassificationwerefoundusefulfor
qualitativepurposesbutunreliableforquantitativepredictionoffield
ratesofheave.Predictionofhraveiscurrentlybasedonswelltestsin
consolidationtypeequipmentandti,eseI;lethodsrequireextremecaution.The
technicalliteratLirefailedtoprovidesufficientdatafromwhichacceptablelimitsofsubgradeheavebeneathairpoytpavementscouldbeestablished.Stabilizationofexpansivesoilsmaybeaccomplishedwithcementor
lime.AprocedureisrrovidedfCTthedesignofstabilizedlayers.Present des
i gnsys-cemsdonotprovi deme-l ;lOdsfordes i 0ni
ngvolumechanges;therefore,theinfluenceofstabilizersonvolunechangebehaviorisnotprODerlyaccountedforinthisprocedure.Anoutlineoftheresearchneededto
a designis!wesented.Thetechnologyrequired
lSpresentlyavallablebutaconsiderableeffortisrequiredtoproduceimTheapproachrecommendedconsistsofestablishingthe
loadanamOlsturechangesexpectedtooccuratthesiteandevaluationof
thesoilresponsetothose 17.KeyWord.18.DistributionSrotement
Pavementdesign,Claysoils,Documentisavailabletothepublic
Expansivesoils,Ai rrort throughtheTechnicalInforS,'/ellpotenti
a1,mationService,Springfield,Virginia Swellpredictions,22151.
19.SecurityClass;" (of thisreport) I FI:-:J - "'rmDOTF1700.7(8-721
Reproducti_of completedpogeauthorized METRICCONVERSIONFACTORS
S,.1Io1 ApproximateConversionstoMetricMeasures
Whl.Vo.111_M.hill"II,ToFiS,.lIol '" -= = --..,.. .... -.. S,..lIol
Apprexi.ateConversionstr lI.tric1I....r.. Whl.V..
lne.M.llill"IIyTeFie'S.et lID--. LEISTH
LENGTH --rmImillimeters0.04inchesin emcentimeters0in..in in ft
yd inches leel yards "2.5 30 0.9 centinw,.s centimeters meters em
cm m -0 ---:!l ------m m kmmeters meters kil......lers 3.3 1.1 0.6
feet y.... miles ft. yd M' mi miles1.6kllunet8fskm !; AREA -----:e
AREA in2 ftl ydl mi2 squareinches squa.efeel squareyards $quare mi
les 6.5 0.09 0.8 2.6 square centimeters square meters square meter
5 square cml ml ml kml 0-. ------
...-cml ml kmZ ha squarecent irre,ers squaremeters squareki
lometers hfl:' dl""l,l ,'.) ' ....... l>.;l ... 01
WeIghtsandMeasures,?rlce52.25.SD'0. C13.1, ; n:r a..
-------==-E
-40 I -40 C !! I 0 !! I -20 II i \40 II 0 I 80 ! III II!I
II'i4060 20 37 II II 80
I 100 C CONTENTS Section Page. 1INTRODUCTION 5 2EXPANSIVESOILS 7
3EXPANSIVESOILSTESTPROCEDURES16
4IDENTIFICATIONANDCLASSIFICATIONSYSTEMS25 Introduction25
GeneralClassificationSystems26
Expansive-SoilClassificationSystems27 Evaluation 36
5PREDICTIONOFIN-SITUHEAVE45 ConsolidometerTesting45
FactorsInfluencing1n-SituHeave47 PredictionMethods53
6STABILIZATIONOFEXPANSIVI.SOILS65 Introduction65
ChemicalStabilization66 SelectionofStabilizingAgents68
StabilizedSoilDesignandEvaluation69 SubsystemforLimeStabilization69
SUbsystemforCementStabilization77
SoilStabilizationSystemforExpansiveSoils83
.7CONSTRUCTIONOFCHEMICALLYSTABILIZEDSOILS89
8CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS93 APPENDIXA:SWELLTESTPROCEDURE103
APPENDIXC:ESTIMATIONOFFINALEQUILIBRIUMMOISTURE
APPENDIXH:RESIDUALSTRENGTHREQUIREMENTSFORSTABILIZED
APPENDIXB:LINEARSHRINKAGETEST111 CONTENTUNDERPAVEMENTS114
APPENDIXD:SOILSUCTION116 APPENDIXE:LIMESTABILIZATIONPROCEDURES121
APPENDIXF:SSISSOILSAflPLES131
APPENDIXG:CEMENTSTABILIZATIONPROCEDURES135 SOILMIXTURES153
REFERENCES 168 ILLUSTRATIONS FigurePage
1NatureofHydrationVolumeChanges12
2SwellIndexVersusPotentialVolumeChange19
3ConsistencyLimitsandIndexes21
4DeterminationofPotentialExpansivenessofSoils30
5InterrelationshipofPlasticityIndexandVolume Shrinkage30
6ApplicabilityofProposedChartforClassificationof
Twenty-SevenNaturalSoils32
7CorrelationofSwell,Li-1UidLimit,andDryUnitWeight34
8RelationshipBetweenPla,ticityIndexandPVCSwellIndex39
9ComparisonofMultiplea ldSingleParameter ClassificationSystems40
10EffectsofPlacementConlitionsonStructure49
11StagesofGenesisofNonJalGilgai50 12TypesofSwellTestData55
13SelectionofStabilizer70 14SS ISSubsystemforNonexpedi
entSubgradeStabil i zati on withLime71
15pHTestVersusStrength-estasPredictorofOptimum LimeContent73
16Twenty- Ei ght- DayStrengtl\Predi ctedbyAcceleratedCure74 17Des i
gnChartforFreezer-hawLoss75
18DesignChartforThree-CycleFreeze/ThawStrengthFrom Vacuum
Strength76 19DesignSubsystemforNonexpedientSubgradeStabilization
withLime78 20SSISSubsystemforNonexpedientSubgradeStabilization
withCement79
21CorrelationBetweenSeveri-DayandTwenty-Eight-DayUnconfinedCompressiveStrength80
22CorrelationBetweenSix-CycleAcceleratedandTwelveCycleStandardFreeze/ThawWeightLoss82
23DesignSubsystemforNonexpedientSubgradeStabilization withCement84
24SelectionofTypeofAdmixtureforExpansiveSoil Stabilization85 2
ILLUSTRATIONS(Conc1'd.) Figure 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Page
SubsystemforExpansi veSoi 1Stabil i zationwi thLime87
SubsystemforExpansiveSoilStabilizationwithCement88
DiagramforComputingAllowableHeave95 RecommendedDesignProcedure96
SuctionMeasurementProcedure98
EvaluationofNaturalandStabilizedSoils100
Heave/RoughnessAmplitudeRelationshipforDesign101 3 TABLES Table 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Page.
EstimatedSoi.1PropertiesSignificanttoEngineering8
SchematicDiagramsandPropertiesofClayMinerals10
TypicalSoilProperties17 TypicalResultsofSwellTests17
ApproximateRelationshipofExpansionIndex toOtherTests21
SummaryofExpansive-Soi!ClassificationSystems37
SwellPotentialPredictionMethodsUsedfor StatisticalComparison42
ResultsofStatisticalAnalysisofSwellPotential PredictionMethods43
SummaryofIn-SituHeavePredictionMethods54
SampleCalculationofSOilMovement59
ConversionofVolumeChat'getoPotentialVerticalRise60
VanDerMerwe'sHeavePrf:diction62 CalculationofTotalSweil63
PCASoil/Cement,Freeze/lhawWeightLossCriteria83 4 SECTION1
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND
Thepavementsofairports(i.e.,runways,taxiways,ramps,parkingaprons,
etc.)constituteavitalpartoftheoverallfacilityandthereforepavement
constructionandmaintenancecostsareimportantintheplanningandoperation
ofairports.Prematurefailureofthesepavements(manifestedassurface
roughness)effectsoperationallimitations,acceleratesaircraftfatigue,and
reducessafety;ontheotherhand,initialconstructionandmaterialcosts
prohibitdeliberateoverdesignof pavements. A
majorcauseofprematurepavementfailureisunderlyingexpansivesoils whi
chbyshri nki ngandswell i ngcausesurfaceroughness.Althoughcurrent
FederalAviationAdministration(FilA).designprocedures(ref.1)donotadequatelytreatthedesignofpavemelltsoverexpansivesoils,recognitionofexpansivesoilsasasignificantengineeringproblemtookplacemanyyearsago.
A
concentratedeffortbytheworldengineeringcommunitytosolvethisproblem
wasbegunin1965withtheFirstIliternationalConferenceandhascontinued
withthefollowingnationalandinternationalconferences:
(1)FirstInternationalResearchandEngineeringConferenceon
ExpansiveClaySoils,August30-3,1965,Texas
A&MUniversity,CollegeTexas.
(2)SecondInternationalResearchandEngineeringConferenceon
ExpansiveClaySoils,1969,TexasA&MUniversity,College
Station,Texas.
(3)ThirdInternationalResearchandEngineeringConferenceon
ExpansiveClaySoils,July30- August1,1973,Haifa,Israel.
(4)WorkshoponExpansiveClaysandShalesinHighwayDesignand
Construction,sponsoredbytheFederalHighwayAdministration,
December13- 15,1972,Denver,Colorado.
(5)University-IndustryWorkshoponBehaviorofExpansiveEarth
Materials,sponsoredbytheNationalScienceFoundation,
October1974,Denver,Colorado. 5
Theproceedingsoftheseconferences,specialtysessionsinthemeetingsof
theInternationalConferenceonSoilMechanicsandFoundationEngineering
(ICSMFE),andseveralsignificantliteraturereviewsformthebasisofthis
report.
Thisinvestigationwasinitiatedtl1reviewthecurrentengineeringliterature
andsynthesizefromitadesignprlicedureforstabilizingexpansivesoilsbeneathairportpavements.Todoths,thestudywasbrokendowriintosixspecifi
careas: (1)Methodsofidentifyingaridclassifyingthetypesofsoilthat
areconsideredexpansiveandcauseearlypavementdistress
(2)Laboratoryand/orfieldLestmethodstodeterminethelevel
ofexpansionandshrinkal.e
(3)Selectionofthetypeancamountofstabilizingagent(lime,
cement,asphalt,only)
(4).Testmethodstodeterminlthephysicalpropertiesofstab"j 1i zedsoi 1
(5)Testmethodstodeterminfthedurabilityofstabilizedsoil
(6)Fieldconstructioncriteriaandprocedures SCOPE
Thisreportaddressestheaboveobjectivesandprovidesasummaryofthecurrentliteraturepertainingtothesubject.Conclusionsandrecommendations
weremadebasedonthecurrentliterature,withoutlaboratoryverification.
Soilvolumechangescausedbyotherfactors(e.g.,frostheave,saltheave)
werenotstudied. 6 SECTION2 EXPANSIVESOILS ORIGINANDDISTRIBUTION
Expansivesoilsaremadeupofclayparticlesthatresultfromthealteration
ofparentmaterials.Alterationtakesplacebyseveralprocesses:weathering,
diagenesis,hydrothermalaction,neoformation,andpostdepositionalalteration
(ref.2).Mostclaymineralsaretransportedbyairorwatertoareasofaccumulation.Oncedeposited,thematerialsaresubjectedtothelocalconditionsofaccumulation(overburden)1nderosionwhichmakeupthegeologic
stresshistoryofthematerials(ref.3).Thus,theexistingclaysoilata
siteistheproductofparentmaterial,modeofalteration,andgeologichistory.Interactionbetweenthesoilandthelocalenvironmentproducescontinualchangeinthesoilanddeterminesfuturebehavior.
Expansivesoilsaredistributedallovertheworld.Usuallytheareaswith
themostsevereproblemsarethose' ~ i t h
localclimatesthatproducedesiccation.A
recentreport(ref.4)providestheresultsofastudyofthedistributionofexpansivesoilsintheC01tinenta1UnitedStates.Distributionis
generallyaresultofgeologichist:Jry,sedimentation,andlocalclimaticconditions.A
moredetailedandlocalizedsourceofdistributioninformationis
availablethroughsoilsurveyspub1ishedbytheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture
SoilConservationService.Thesesurveysprovidedistributionmapsandconsiderableinformationusefulinengineeringapplications(table1).Inthe
initialplanningofairportfacilities,publicationsreflectingthedistributionofsoiltypesintheareashouldbecarefullyconsidered,andthelocationwiththebestsoilconditions3hou1dbeselected.Thethreeclaytypes
recognizedinengineeringstudiesexhibitdistinctlydifferentstructures
(table2).Kaoliniteismadeupofalternatelayersofsilicatetrahedraand
gibbsiteboundtogetherbyrelativelystronghydrogenbonds(ref.6).Therelativelylargeparticlesandstablestructurearenotexpansive.Illiteismade
upofa2:1structureconsistingofgibbsitesheetssurroundedbysilicatetrahedra.About20percentofthesi1iconsarereplacedbyaluminum,andtheresultingnegativechargeisbalancedbypotassiumionsbetweenthe2:1sheets.
7 -----Table1.Estimated>oi1PropertiesSignificantto
Engineerinl[afterFo'lks(ref.5)J J),pth fe1m Soil series and map
symbolsDepthtosurf'ere in bedrock"'I'resentltive profile
f--------------,----F,uIII"Rednun:RD, RE, RG_I):{ .,>5 -... 60
TravessillapartofRG,secTranssilla ForPenapart
ofRE,HrePenaserirs:fnr ecrics. Riverwash:RH. Toovariable
forvalidinterpretation. "Rock outcrop:RK,RL.
Tonvariableforvalidintr.rpr('tati(ln.For ChimayopartofRL,sceChimayo
series. Rock slides:RO. Toovariable forvalidinterpretation.
Roughbrokenland:R U Toovariableforvalidinterpretation. "SantaFe:SF,
Sk, SM._01-13 ForLaFondapartofSF,HeeLa. Fonda13
series.RockoutcroppartsofSkand
SMaretoovariableforvalidinterpr,,tation, "Silver:SP, SR._ 1-14
ForPojoaquepartofS p.seePojoaqu"II4:' series.4 ',-60 StonY roek
land: ST. 'roovariableforvalidinterpretation. "Su!>"rviHnr:S
U,SV, _____ 1-23 Rockoutrrop part ofSVistoo variable for
validinterpretation,23 "Tapia:T
A______________________________>5 "-21
21-60ForDeanpart,secDeanseri-es. 11-10 ForBernalpartofT
S,secBernalHerirs. Rockoutcroppart ofT R istoovariable forvalid
interpretation, "Trave"ilIa:T S,TR___ ___________________Tuff rock
land:T U, Toovariable forvalidinterpretation.
Wilcoxson,variant:we____________________2*-3 11-26 21,-31 31 "-10
11'-60 Willard:WL... __ ___ _>5
Witt:WN________________________________>5 "-:l631 .. 60
Zuni,variant:Z LJ.,1'-16 If,-20 20 IInmapping unitAocorrosivityto
uncoatedsteelishi(l:h. USDAtextureUnified ClayInam
____________________CL Verytilll' sandyrlayloam..CL or1\11.
VeryR",\'''llycillyloam..GC Bedrock. Clay(loam,urfa,'"layer).
______CI. Siltyrlayloam._____________CL Veryfinesandyloam __,___ML
Gra\'ellyHandyloamandverySM Rravellylightsandyloam. Bedrock.
Clayloam(loamsurface I..yer) _.CL Gravellyloam,.. ____81\1or SC
Loam__ ______________________ML clay,clay,andgravellyCH clay..
Coarse sandy loamSM Softbedrock. Loam__ ..ML or CL ClayloamCL Clay
loamand sandy clay loam __CLorMI.LoamML orCL Loamand
clayloamMLorCL.ClayCH Weatheredbedrock. Inmapping
unitBfcorrosivityto uncoated steelishightl,roughout. 8 AASHO A-6
orA-7 A-6 orA-4 A-2 A-6 orA-7 A-6 A-4 A-I A-6 A-4 A-4 A-7 A-2 A-4
orA-6 A-6 A-6 A-4 A-4 orA-6 A-7 CoansPercentage less than 3
inchespassing sieve-fractionAvailable greaterPermea "'ater than
3No.4No.10No.40No,200hilit)holding
inches(4.7(2.0(0.42(0.074capacity mm.)mm.)mm.)mm.) lrtdl,.ptr inch
Part'''''l r t ( f l ~ ' perhourof .oil .. _-------
---------10090-10080-90O.l)f'-O.2O.IBO.21 ---------
---------10090-1007(1800.1;:1-2.0o.IHI.16
---------35-5530-5025-4520-35O.1\3-2.00.08-0.10
-----_.--95-10090-10090-10085-950.06-0.2O.14-0.16
-.-------95-10090-10090-10085-9502--0.63O.19-0.21
--------.95-1009010085-9550-6.';O.';3-2.0ll.16-0.18
5-1580-9055-6530-4015-252.0-6.30.06-0.08
---25.:3595-10090-10085-9575-850.63-2.0O.19-0.21
80-9075-8560-7535-500.1):1-2.0 -------_ ..
--0-2590-10085-9565--7550-600.63-2.0O.14-0.18 ......... _- ...
-_.90-9585-9575-8565-750.06-0.2O.14-0.16 ..... - ..... - ...
10095-10055-6525-352.0-6.3O.10-0.12 .. - ..- ... -- ..
--------.10085-9560-750.63-2.0O.16-0.18
-----------------.10090-10070-850.2-0.630.05-0.07 ---------
---------10080-9065-750.63-2.0O.16-0.\8 --_.... ---- ------_.. -
10085-9560-750.63-2.0 -------------------_. ------- .. 100 I
85-9560-750.2-6.3O.17-0.19 --------..- ..---_ .. -
10090-10075-950.06-0.2O.14-0.16 IIn mapping unitFs
corrosivitytouncoatedsteelishighthroughout. 9 ReactionI(I :5
dilution) pH7.9-9.0 7.9-8.4 6.6-7.3 7.9-8.4 7.9-8.4 7.9-8.4 6.1-6.5
7.9-9.0 8.5-9.0 7.4-7.8 6.1-7.3 6.6-7.3 7.9-8.4 8.G-9.0 7.9-8.4
8.5-9.0 6.1-7.3 6.6-7.3 Shrink-swell potential Corrosivity
touncoated steel I I High.. _. __. __ Moderate. l\loderate.. _...
_.Moderate. Low __._ _.. Moderate...
High..........High.:\foderate..... __.Moderate. I.ow...... _.Low.
Low____ . __ __ Low. Moderate....... __Moderate.Low __ .. _._ . ___
Low. Lowtomoderate._Low. High .. __ _______ High. Low. _. _____ __
Low. Lowtomoderate._Moderate. Moderate.... _.. _High. Moderate...
_. __Moderate.Low__ _ ____ Low. Moderate..... _Moderate.High ...
________ ._ High. Table2.SchematicDiagramsandPropertiesofClay
(afterreference6) 11 oni te III ite Kao1i nite Schematic Structure
of Clay r'li nera1s
o
,\"\... \', I\"\ I\', 0I't IOtt";0I'toO#j(}fflS,e
Aluminum,0PoloSS/llm o and .5,licoIJS (onelounhreploced
byoluminums) OOxyqens,eHyd1oxylS,AJumin/lm,0Po/oss/um o ond SdiCOns
(one 10000Ih r(yJlocedbyaluminums) Particle 0I 0.5 to2 llmI
0.003to0.1llmI 9.5AThickness SpecificSurface,I10 - 20I65 - 180I50 -
840 m2 /g CationExchange Capaci ty,I 3 - 15I10 - 40I 80 - 150t4i 11
equi va 1ents 100grams
Thepotassiumbondsarestrongandpreventwaterfromenteringbetweenthe
layers.Inmontmorillonitea2:1structurelikethatofilliteispresent,
butthereischaracteristicallyextensiveisomorphoussubstitution,whichdeterminesthebehaviorofthemineral.Asusedhere,isomorphoussubstitution
meansthesubstitutionofonemetallicionforanotherwithinthetetrahedral
oroctahedralunit.Theimportanteffectofthelatticesubstitutionsisa
netnegativechargethatattractsbipolarwatermoleculesbetweenthelayers;
thisresultsinanexpandedlayerstructure(fig.1). MECHANISMSOFSWELL
Soilvolumechangesresultfromanimbalanceintheinternalenergyofthesystem(soil/water/plants/air).Energyimbalancesimportantinengineeringresult
frommoisturemovementcausedbyloads,desiccation,andtemperaturechanges
(refs.7,8).Responsetoaspecificsetofconditionsisdeterminedbythe
composition,structure,andgeologichistoryofthesoil.Thelargestcomponentofvolumechangeisthatoftheclaymicellewhichsurroundstheindividual
clayparticles"inthesoil(refs.6,9).Waterisforcedoutofthemicelleby
loads,desiccation,ortemperaturealongenergygradientsandareductionin
volumeresults.Whentheseinfluencesareremovedorreduced,theenergygradientsarereversed;theavailablewaterisforcedintotheclaymicelleand
swellisproduced(ref.10).Sinceseveraldetailedstudies(refs.4,6,9,
1])arepresentedintheliterature,discussionhereislimitedtothatrequiredforanunderstandingofexpansivesoilbehavior.
WaterFixationbyPolarAdsorption(Hydration)
Bipolarwatermoleculesareattractedtotheclayparticlesurfacebytheelectricchargeimbalancecausedbyisomorphoussubstitution,usuallynegative
(refs.2,9,12,13).A
layerofsolid-likewaterformsanewsurfaceoforientedparticles,whichattractssucceedinglayersoforientedwatermolecules,
o 0 uptoathicknessof10to16molecularlayersor25to40A (lA=10-Bcm ).
Thewaterbeyondthisboundlayerismobileandmovesfreelyunderanystress
gradient(refs.2,13,14).Theboundwaterlayerspermitadjacentparticles
toslippastoneanotherwithoutelasticrebound,rupture,orappreciable ,,-
uo:>"_mnlo-' 11
LUII:>I.t1I1I..ILI'''II''!''!InterparticleorIntracrystalline C=
concentrationinthebulksolution,molesofions/litero
Ccanbederivedfromdiffusedoublelayertheory(ref.7):c where v=
valenceofion B = temperature-dependentconstant(usuallytakenasl015
cmmi 11i mo1e- 1) d= halfthedistancebetweenclayplatelets,cm
X=4/vBG,whereG =surfacechargedensity,coulomb-cm-2 o o valuesofX
areasofollows:illite,X ::l/vA;kaolinite,X = oo o
2/vA;montmorillonite,X ::4/vA.Ruiz(refs.9,17)modifiedtheequation o
forrealsoilsasfollows: where P= realsoilswellingpressure f=
functionofmoisturecontent,f< 1
Osmosisispossibleonlyinpolarfluids,suchaswater,thatareabletodisperseexchangeablecations.SwellingvarieswiththetypeofcationandgenerallydecreasesintheorderNa,Li,K,Ca,Mg,and2HforWyomingbentonite
(refs.9,18,19). SurfaceTension
Thespacesbetweenclayparticlesinsoilsformcapillarytubes.Aswateris
removedfromthesoil,anair/waterinterfaceforms.Attractionofwatermoleculestothewallsofthecapillarytube(soilparticles)producesmenisci
(refs.6,9).Tensioninthewater,u(g-cm-2 ),maybeexpressedas (ref.13)
Asthewatercontentdecreases t themeniscirecedeintothecapillaries t
drawingparticlesclosertogetheruntilnofurthervolumechangeispossiblebecauseofparticlecontact.Thetensioninthewaterisbalancedbycompression
"inthesoilparticles.Whenadditionalwaterbecomesavailable t
thewatertensionisreleasedandthesoilparticlesreboundastheassociatedcompressive
stressisrelieved. Thermoosmosis
Themovementofsoilmoisturecausedbytheenergygradientproducedbytemperaturedifferences
t whichcausechangesinwatervaporpressure t iscalled
thermoosmosis(ref.9).Thisaspectofmoisturemovement t
althoughnegligible insaturatedsoils(refs.20 t
21),issignificantinunsaturatedsoils.The
swellassociatedwithsuchmoisturemovementissmall(ref.9).
ElasticBending
Elasticdeformationandreboundofsoilparticlesunderappliedloadsmaycontributetoshrinkageandswellingbehavior
t particularlyinsoilswithflat
platyparticles(ref.22).UsingmicaanddunesandtGi"lboy(ref.23)illustratesthiseffect.Theresultsofhistestsshowthattheconsolidationand
reboundofcompactedmixturesareproportionaltothemicacontent t andthe
contributionofelasticbendingdependsonparticlestructureandproperties
asshownbelow: VolumeDecreaseIncreaseinVoid Mi ca t%Under10kg/cm2
(142psU t% RatioUponRemoval ofLoad t % 103626 204731 405142
EntrappedAir Whenaninitiallydesiccatedclayisallowedtotakeupwater t
airmaybetrappedwithinthesoilmass.Thisairdisplaceswaterinthedoublelayerandinducestensilestressesintheparticlessurroundingtheairpocket.Thisinfluenceisgreaterinsoilswithhigheraircontents(i.e.
tdriersoils). 15 SECTION3 EXPANSIVESOILSTESTPROCEDURES
Theproceduresdescribedinthissectionhavebeenusedinengineeringstudies
ofexpansivesoilsandinsomecasestheliteratureprovidesconsiderabledata
derivedfromtheiruse.Table3waspreparedtoshowtheresultsnormallyobtainedforgeneralsoiltypes.Thedifferentproceduresforevaluatingswell
potentialarereflectedinthevariationinswellandswellpressurevalues
reportedintheliterature(table4).Otherproceduresreportedintheliteraturearetooexpensive,complex,ortimeconsumingforroutineengineeringdesignpurposes.However,fortheinterestedreader,thesetechniquescanbe
foundinthefollowingreferences: TechniqueReference
X-RayDiffraction2,24,25,26,27 ElectronMicroscopy2,25,26
DifferentialThermalAnalysis2,24 InfraredRadiation27
DyeAdsorption6,27 SpecificSurfaceArea9,28,29
CationExchangeCapacity2,30 DielectricDispersion31 SWELL A
remoldedorundisturbedsoilsampleisplaced"inaconsolidometerunderspecifiedconditionsandallowedaccesstowater.Theverticalriseofthespecimenisthen
A sampleofthisprocedureispresentedinappendixA;
numerousversionsinvolvingvariationsinsamplepreparation,wetting,soaking,
specimensize,surchargeloading,etc.,arereportedintheliterature.Because
ofthesevariousprocedures,itisdifficulttocompareonesetofresultsto
another.Eventhoughnosingleprocedureiswidelyaccepted,thisisthemost
popularandreliabletechniqueforevaluatingswellpotential.Thistestmay
bereferredtoasaswelltestorafreeswelltest,dependingonthe 16
Table3.TypicalSoilProperties(afterreference32)
TestProceduresHeavyTypi ca1Si 1tySandySoilProperty Soils
ClaysClaysSoils ASTMAASHO Gradation(%ofgrainsize 40-100500422T88
80-10030-80showninthesoil) GrainSize(mm)~
O.0050.05-0.0052.0-0.050422T88 :::0.005 I ,Consistency I
LiquidLimit(%)80-10025-50Nonplastic0423T89 40-60 Nonplastic0424
PlasticLimit(%)5-305-30T90 -NonplasticT91
PlasticityIndex(%)70-8020-4010-200424 D427T92
ShrinkageLimit(%)15-30NoVolume 6- 14 -Change \ I
MaximumOensity(lb/ft 3 )I-Ii 90-105100-115110-135 I 0698T99 0698T99
OptimumMoistureContent(%}]- 20-3015-258-15 I I
Table4.TypicalResultsofSwellTests Reference -.Rangeof Swell, %
Rangeof SwellPressure, psi SoilsUsedRemarks I
330-13.60-83Texas&Israel1.4-psisurchargein swelltest. 340-
13.60-83TexasGulfCoast1.4-ps isurchargein swelltest. I 350-
15.80-284 I IsraelUSBRProcedures: surcharge. l-ps i 360- 50.
10-147~ ~ e s ternU.S.USBR 371.3- 39.8- WesternU.S.USSR 37 38
O.1-54. 0 --0-69 IpureClay&Mixtures IContinentalU.S. USBR
FHA,PVCSwellIndex 17
typeofloadingappliedtothesample.Resultsmaybeexpressedinpercent
swellunderthespecificloadused. SWELLPRESSURE A
testsimilartothatdescribedabove,exceptthatthesampleisloadedin
incrementssothatthevolumeremainsconstant,maybeperformedtodetermine
swellpressure--thepressurerequiredforzerovolumechange.Thistestin
combinationwiththefreeswelltestisoftenperformedonthesamesamplein
sometestprocedures(appendixA).Itisalsoreferredtoasano-volumechangetes
t. POTENTIALVOLUMECHANGE
Potentialvolumechangeisdeterminedbyano-volume-changetestinaspecified
apparatusdevelopedfortheFederalHousingAdministrationandusedforsoil
classification(ref.39).Testdurationistwohours.Thepressurerequired
forzerovolumechangeiscalledtheswellindex(giveninpoundspersquare
foot)anditisusedinclassifyingthesoil.Figure2illustratestheuseof
theswellindextoclassifysoilsbasedonthemethodofsamplepreparation
(i.e.,wet,dry,moist). EXPANSIONINDEX
Theexpansionindex,EI,isanindexpropertyofasoildeterminedinaspecifiedconsolidometerringapparatusdevelopedforevaluationofsoilexpansion
(ref.40).TheEIiscalculatedby EI== (lOOO)t.hF where t.h==
verticalexpansionmeasured F== fractionofthesample30%
PlasticityIndex>12% LinearShrinkage>8%
Thesecriteria,whicharebasedontheA-lineoftheplasticitychartdeveloped
byCasagrande,areusedintheUnifiedSoilClassificationSystem.Thelinear
shrinkagecriteriaareincludedtodetectthosesilt-clayandsiltysoilsthat
areexpansive. Skempton,1953(ref.42)
Theactivityofsoilsasdeterminedbytheplasticityindexand% 12>8
>1.25 >10>300 >81. 5>5>2030-60 >60 >4>20
W -...J PI I:::Reference Ca tegory VeryLow 50493837554033 %
VI..t:Cl..- Cl.. ro ..t: :::l+-' 0" > >,0:::
,......:::lLO,......uEOVI+-'..0OJ ,......U0C:0'l - V'l or- (]JOr-
I/) ro(]Jor- co :::lUrocoUroco:::l ro 000 (/')I/) 1/)-'1/) I/) c::(
0 z:::r::: 0::: z:>::E:> => .;.; --.;.;.;.; .;.;.;.;.;.;
.;.;.; .;.;.;.; .;.; xIx xxx xx .; .;.;.; .;.;.;.; .;.; xxxx/1
.;.;.;.;.;.;.; .;.; .;.;.;.; .; x .;.;.;.; .;.;.;.; .;.;.;.;.;xxI
.;.;.;.; .;.;.; .;.;.;.;.;.;xx xxx Xxxxxxxxx xxx .;.;.; .;.;.;
.;.;.;.;.; .;xx x .;.;.;.;.;x xxx xxxxxx .;.;.;.; .;.;.;.;.;.; .;.;
xx x .;.;.;.; .;.; .;.;.;.;.;.;.; x x xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx .;.;xxx
xxxxxxx xxx - Factors Involved inHeave .----------ClayThickness
WaterTableDepth Initial01 SoilStructure
ClayParticles Particle Arrangement I ClodStructure
BulkStructureI Init i a1St res s FinalMoisture IFinalStresses
Load/Moisture/Volume Relationship RateofVolume Change
SeasonalVariations r------,......(]J -0 0 .-+->U(]J ........Or-
........0.; .; iI /,! .; .; .; x .; I I x .; .; x x
(]J +->(]JE 0 -0(]J (]J ,........0 Note:.;=
consideredintheprediction;x= notconsideredinthepredictiono '" o
'r+-' ttl a::: "'0 o >LogofLoad(P) Figure12.TypesofSwellTestData
overburdenpressure,(1to2).Thenitissubjectedtoachangeinmoisture
conditionandmaintainedatconstantvolumeuntilequilibriumisreached(3).
Thispressureiscalledtheswell:n"essure(no-volume-changetest).Thepressureisthenreleasedtoasmallarbitrarilyselectedloadortoaspecific
designload,(3to4).Anothertestprocedureloadsthesoiltotheoverburdenpressure(2),allowsittoswellunderconstantloadto(5),andloads
thesampletotheoriginalvoidratio(6).Withthiskindoftestprocedure,
swellmaybecalculatedasfollows: -.--6._e_(t'lH)s==- e 1 where 6.e==
changeinvoidratio(finaltoinitial) e== originalvoidratio 1
6.Hthicknessofsoillayer 55
Thecurve(1to7)illustratesatestinwhichasoilisloadedtotheinitial
overburdenpressure,(7),unloadedtoafinaloverburdenpressure;(2),and
permittedaccesstowater;thentheswellisdetermined(analysisofcutsections).Ineachsituation,eventsfollowaspecificsequence.Thecloser
theseduplicatein-situconditions,thebetterthepredictionofsoilbehavior.
Thosemethodsreportedintheliteratureinwhichsomeformoftheconsolidometertestisusedareasfollows:
(1)DirectModelMethod,TexasHighwayDepartment(ref.77)
(2)JenningsandKnight'sDoubleOedometerTest(refs.65,78)
(3)SullivanandMcClelland'sMethod(ref.79)
(4)Sampson,Schuster,andBudge'sMethod(ref.80)
(5)MississippiMethod(refs.81,82,83,84)
(6)SalasandSerratosa'sMethod(ref.20) (7)Noble'sMethod(ref.7)
(8)NavyMethod(ref.85) (9)SimpleOedometerMethod(ref.86)
(10)USBRMethod(ref.63) (11)Vo1umeter(ref.87)
(12)Holtz'sMethod(ref.76)
Eachofthesemethodshassomesimilaritywiththeothersaswellassomedifferences.Someinvolvemultiplesamples(e.g.,2and10);othersdonot.No
onemethodisclearlybetterthananotherforairportpavementconstruction.
Anyprocedurethatisusedmustbeadaptedtoaparticularsituationandan
effortmustbemadetosimulatetheseactualin-situconditions.Atbestthese
methodsprovideestimatesofquestionableaccuracyunlesstheyareusedwith
considerableexperiencewiththespecificsoilandclimaticconditionsunder
study(refs.40,63).
Predictionsofin-situheavearemadebytestingeachsoillayerinthesystemtodetermineitsresponsetochangesinloadandmoisture.Theindividual
layersmayrepresentdifferenttypesofsoil,thesamesoilindifferentmoistureconditions,orthesamesoilatdifferentdensities.Onceeachlayeris
56
identifiedandaswellpercentageisassignedbytestingintheconsolidometer,
thecalculationofsurfaceheaveisstraightforwardisshownbelow.
ThicknessVerticalRise Depth, ft ofSoi 1 Layer, ft Overburden
Pressure,* 1b/ft2 Swell, % VerticalRise DuetoLayer, in atLayer
Surface, in 0-2212581. 927.68 2-4237540.965.76 4-10687532. 164.80
10-122137530.722.64 12-208200021. 921. 92 20-2442750000 Bedrock
Inthisillustration,thepredictedsurfaceheaveis7.68in.Thedesigner
shouldcarefullyevaluatetheproceduresusedinestablishingtheinitialmoistureconditionsandloadaswellasthefinalmoistureconditionsandloadused
inthetests.Theseparametersandtheirrelationshiptoin-situconditions
willdeterminetoalargedegreetheaccuracyoftheprediction.Withsome
methodsalateralrestraint-factormaybeusedtoreduceswellvaluesforcertainsoils(e.g.,particularlyhighlyfissuredclays).Theamountoftesting
requiredforthistypeofanalysiscanbegreatintermsoftimeandmoney.
Thevariabilityofthesoilsystemmustbestudiedinordertoarriveatthe
amountoftestingrequiredtoadequatelyevaluatetheswellpotential.Once
thesedataareavailable,theeffectofsoilremoval,stabilization,compaction,etc.maybeevaluatedquantitatively,providedswelldataarealsogatheredforthestabilizedand/orcompactedmaterials.
RichardsMethod(ref.88)
Usingcurvesofmoisturecontentversusmatrixsuctionplottedfrommeasured
values,Richardspredictsmoisturecontentchangesassoilsreachtheir
*Averageatcenteroflayer,basedondensityofoverlyingmaterialandstructuralload.A
densityof125lb/ft 3 wasassumedforallsoilsinthisillustration. 57
equilibriummoistureconditionsunderpavements.Assumingthevolumechange
ofthesoilisequaltotheVolumeofwatertakenup,hegives and where
W=initialwatercontent,% o (svl=changeinwatercontent(w - I-'J f ),~
~o Gspecificgravityofsolids(approximately2.70) s V,L,H=
volume,length,height,respectively
WithempiricalrelationshipsdevelopedforAustralianconditions,thefinal
equilibriummoisturecontentunderapavementispredicted.Withthisrelationship,wf
maybepredictedfromthemoisture/suctioncurvespreviously
determinedforeachsoillayer.A samplecalculationisshownintable10.
McDowellISPVRMethod(ref."Sl)
Anundisturbedsampleofeachsoillayerinthesystemisintroducedintoa
triaxialcellandthesampleisallowedtoabsorbwaterunderasmall(2psi)
lateralpressure.AfterthesamplehasabsorbedwaterforlSdays(oranumberofdaysequaltotheplasticityindex,ifitisgreater)thevolumechange,
6V,isconvertedtoalinearverticalrise,6L,fromanempiricalchart.With
anotherempiricalchart,6Lisreducedaccordingtothestressimposedbythe
overburdenload.Theremainingpercentageofverticalriseisthensummedfor
eachincrement.Anexampleofthisprocedureisshownintable11.Columns
show:(1)theincrementsofoverburdenloadsintowhichthesystemisdivided,
(2)theaverageoverburdenload,(3)thevolumechangemeasuredundertheexistingoverburdenpressure,(4)thelinearswellcorrespondingtothevolume
change,(S)thethicknessofeachincrementinthesystem,and(6)theconversionofcolumn(4)toapercentandthetotalverticalriseatthesurface.
S8 ---
-----------Table10.SampleCalculationofSoilMovement[afterRichards(ref.88)J
FromDriestConditiontoEquilibriumProfile L,em 0-10 10- 20 20-30
30-40 40-60 60-80 Initial Suction (h ) , oemH0 2 90,000 45,000
10,000 5,000 3,200 2,500 1,80080-100 1,500100- 120 1,400120-140
FinalInitialFinalSuctionEffective Stress(00emH 0 ), (hf ) , emH 0
22 90,0001400 45,0001400 10,0001300 5,0001300 3,2001300 2,5001300
1,8001300 1,5001300 1,4001300 L_-l-__._. --------------. ------___
_______ FromDriesttoWettestCondition(i.e.,Seasonal
SurfaceMovement3.21em Initial SuctionL,em (ho)' emH0 II 2
0-1090,000 10-2045,000 20-3010,000 30-405,000 40-603,200 60-802,500
80-1001,800 1,500 120- 140 100-120 1,400 Initial Effective
Stress(0), ern H00 2 90,000 45,000 10,000 5,000 3,200 2,500 1,800
1,500 1,400 Effective%wo' Stress(of)' emH0 2 140011.5 140014.6
130021.0 130023.3 130024.6 130025. 1 130026.4 130027.1 27.2 1300
Final FinallSuction Effective( hfL Stress(of)' emH0emH0 2 2
--------1---------800800 700700 600600 520520 580580 870870
11201120 13501350 13001300 6w,%6L,em 15.71. 08 12.60.82 6.40.37 4.
10.23 2.80.30 2.30.25 1.00.11 0.30.03 0.20.02 w '%!"I;'/,%o
11.516.7 14.613.8 21. 07.8 23.35.8 24.64.3 2.9 25. 1 26.41.1 27.
1-27.2-6L,em 1. 15 0.90 0.45 0.33 0.46 0.32 0.13
--SurfaceMovement3.73em 59 I VanDerMerwe'sMethod(ref.89)
AnotherempiricalapproachinvolvesclassifyingthesoilbytheWilliams'
:lethod(ref.50)intothecategoriesshownbelow. Wi11i ams'Criteria
PotentialUnitHeave, PI,%Cl ay,%Expansiveness*in/ft 28VeryHigh1. 00
Eachcategoryisassignedaunitheavevalueininchesofheaveperfootof
soillayerthickness.Anempiricalrelationshipforthechangeinpotential
Table11.ConversionofVolumeChangetoPotentialVerticalRise [after
(ref.51)] S\'/e11, l;0 AverageLoad, Load,psi psiVolume
Linear(Average) (3 )(4 ) (1)(2) --r-15. a a 1.5-2.52.009. 12.90
3.757.52.40 2.5-5.0 5.0-7.56.255.51. 80 8. 754.5 7.5- 10.01. 50
11.253.51. 1a 10.0-12.5 13.75 12. 5- 15. 02.60.80 16.252.00.60
15.0-17.5 17.5- 20.018.751.50.50 21.250.30 20.0-22.51.0 22.5-25. a
23.750.80.25 26.250.50.20 25.0-27.5 0.2 27.5-31. 029.250.10
_____L--._ DepthofLayer, ft ( 5) LOx1.15::: 2.5x1. 15::: 2.5x1.
15::: 2.5x1. 15::: 2.5x1. 15::: 2.5x 1. 15= 2.5x 1. 15= 2.5x 1. 15=
2.5x 1. 15= 2.5x 1.15 = 2.5x1.15::: 3.5x1.15::: TotalDepth::: 1. 15
2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 4.03 33.88 L.
VerticalMovement, 2. 2.4% 1.8% 1. 1. 1 0.8% 0.6% O.0.3% in (6) x1.
15x12 x2.87x12 x34.40x12 x34.40x12 x34.40x12 x34.40x12 x34.40x12
x34.40x12 x34.40x12 0.25%x34.40x12 0.2% 0.1% x34.40x12 x4.03x12
TotalPVR DuetoSwell ir-----AllsoilswithA =(PI < 2 12.1
Determineamount ofsulfatepresent.(appendixG) Determine after15I--
40 ./V"l ~/ ./ "'- Second-DegreeCurve ell ./CorrelationCoefficient=
0.96ell 0 .././ Y = 0.002+2.21X- 0.02X 2 ....J ./ +-> ..t:: C"l
30 r ./OJ ::==::: . /// ./ ItS CP..t:: Nt/ First-DegreeCurve
......./OJ 20CorrelationCoefficient= 0.96 N/ Y = 2.41+1.40XOJ / OJ
SI..L OJ ..... ~J/U >, 10 U I /eN .lfe oII I I II I
o102030405060 6-CycleFreeze/ThawWeightLoss(AcceleratedTest),%
Figure22.CorrelationsBetweenSix-CycleAcceleratedandTwelve-CycleStandard
Freeze/ThawWeightLoss[afterCurrinetal.(ref.105)]
Table14.PCASoil/Cement,Freeze/ThawWeightLossCriteria PCACriteria
Accelerated6-Cyc1eFreeze/ThawTest WeightLoss,% AASHOSoilGroup
Maximum WeightLoss, % 1st-DegreeCurve2nd-DegreeCurve
A-1,A-2-4,A-2-5,A-3 A-2-6,A-2-7,A-4,A-5 A-6,A-7
ermeameter:conditionsof, of-)..... "'0..... E :::::I::I:0 N 40 Q)
>..... of-) ItS
Q) e::: 20 HydraulicTensiometers1 o o I 1 I 2 I 3
IIITotal.Suction 10-3 10-2 10-1 10 DonotusePsychrometers
psychrometers....I..arepracti ca1. _.. -.,. - - - - - - --....;a-95
% 'k - - - - - - - - - - - - 90%
, RT./ T=-In pipV\'/0 ----T----------- -
------,-----VeryWet..l.PracticalRangeof- Soi 1s - - - - - - - -
-"1Thennocoup1 ePsychrometersL ..J.e\ _____1GypsumJ I \ e""I I 4567
DFiii 101 102 103 101f TotalSuction(T),bars
Figure1.RelationshipBetweenRelativeHumidityandSuction APPENDIXE
LIMESTABILIZATIONPROCEDURES
Thisappendixprovidestheproceduresusedinthelaboratorytestingofsoil
stabilizationwithlime.Althoughthesearenotstandardtestsineachcase,
theseprocedureswereusedinthedevelopmentofthedataonwhichthesystem
inthisreportisbased.Thematerialpresentedistakendirectlyfromthe
citedreferences.Onlythosechangesneededforconformancetothisformat
havebeenmade. 121 TESTFORpHTODETERMINELIMEREQUIREMENT(REF.103),
Materials Limetobeusedforsoilstabilization Apparatus
1.pHmeter(thepHmetermustbeequippedwithanelectrodehavingapH
rangeof14) 2.150-ml(orlarger)plasticbottleswithscrew-toplids
3.50-mlplasticbeakers 4.CO 2 - freedistilledwater 5.Balance 6.Oven
7.Moisturecans Procedure
1.StandardizethepHmeterwithabuffersolutionhavingapHof12.45.
2.Weightothenearest0.01grepresentativesamplesofair-driedsoil,
passingtheNo.40sieve -andequalto20.0gofoven-driedsoil.
3.Pourthesoilsamplesinto150-mlplasticbottleswithscrew-toplids.
4.Addvaryingpercentagesoflime,weighedtothenearest0.01g,tothe s o i
l s ~ (Limepercentagesof0,2,3,4,5,6,8,and10,basedonthe
drysoilweight,maybeused.) 5.Thoroughlymixsoilanddrylime. 122
6.Add100mlofCO2 - freedistilledwatertothesoil/limemixtures.
7.Shakethesoil/limeandwaterforaminimumof30secoruntilthereis
noevidenceofdrymaterialonthebottomofthebottle.
8.Shakethebottlesfor30secevery10min. 9.After1hr t
transferpartoftheslurrytoaplasticbeakerandmeasure thepH.
10.RecordthepHforeachofthesoil/limemixtures.Thelowestpercentof
limegivingapHof12.40isthepercentrequiredtostabilizethesoil.
IfthepHdoesnotreach12.40t theminimumlimecontentgivingthe
highestpHisthatrequiredtostabilizethesoil.
MOISTURE/DENSITYRELATIONSHIPSOFLIME/SOILMIXTURES(REF.105)
Tofindtheoptimummoisturecontentcorrespondingtothemaximumdrydensity
ofalime/soilmixture t amethodsimilartothatfoundinASTM0698.. 70is
used.Figure1givestheapprox"imateoptimummoistureandmaximumdrydensity
baseduponknownAtterbergLimitsoftheuntreatedsoil.Theoptimummoisturecontentoflime/soilmixturesisalwayshigherthanthesoiluntreated.
Themaximumdrydensityislower.A VicksburgMiniatureCompactionApparatus
isusedtofabricatespecimens.Theapparatusproducesa2-in-diameterby
4-in-highspecimenwithsimilardensitiesproducedwiththecompactionequipmentemployedinASTM0698-70.Theproceduresusedindeterminingtheoptimum
moisturecontentforlime/soilmixturesareasfollows:
(1)TheuntreatedsoilisfirstpassedthroughaNo.4sieve.It maybe
necessarytoairdrythesoiltopermitpulverizationtothepropersize.
(2)Estimatetheapproximatemoisturecontentfromfigure1.Determinethe
proportionsofsoil tlime t
andwaterrequiredforfabricationofapproximatelyfivespecimens.Approximately2100gofmixwillberequired.
Seethelime/soilmixturecalculationsthatfollowtheseprocedures. 123 15
20 +-> .r-25 E .r--l U30 or+-> VI 10 ,...a..35 2840--29-N
.j:::o 45 Note: Numbersbetweencurves identifyzonesofoptimummoi
sturecontentand max imumdrydens ity. 78 50 , ,LI, :".....71 12 1520
25 30 35 40 45 5055 60 65 70 LiquidLimit
Example:Given:PlasticLimit- 20Find:AverageMaximumDryDensityand
LiquidLimit- 35OptimumMoistureContent Answer:110lb/ft3
(Density)16percent ( ~ 1 o i stureContent)
Figure1.ApproximateMoisture/DensityRelationship[after
Ring,etal.(ref.127)] 30- 31-32-33 -34 75808590
(3)WeightheVicksburgMoldtothenearest0.1g andrecordondatasheet..
(4)MeasuretheinsideheightoftheVicksburgMoldwiththeentireassembly
inplacetothenearest0.01in(fromthebasetothetopofthecollar).
Measuretheinsidediameterofthemoldtothenearest0.01inandrecordthevaluesonthedatasheet.
(5)Weighoutthesoil,lime,andwaterrequiredtothenearestg/m1asper
calculations.
(6)Thoroughlymixsoilandlimetogethereitherbyhandorwithanelectric
soilmixeruntilallfreelimeisblendedwiththesoil.
(7)Addwaterevenlytotheblendedsoilandlime(caremustbetakento
preventexcesslossonthesidesofthemixingpot).Mixtheentire
blendthoroughly.Afterthesoilismixed,coverwithadamppaper
toweltopreventmoistureloss.
(8)Weighapproximatelyfiveequalportionsofthesoilmixturetobecompacted.Approximately75to85gperlayerwillproduceaspecimenof
thepropersize.
(9)Poursoilintocompactionmold,levelsoil,andcompactthefirstlayer
withfiveblowsoftheslidinghammer(takeweighttoitsfullheight
ontheslidingrodbeforedropping).
(10)Measuretheheightfromthetopofthecollartothetopofthefirst
compactedlayerofsoil.Bysubtractingthisvaluefromthetotal
height(step4),youwillobtainthethicknessofthecompactedlayer.
Multiplythisfigureby5(numberoftotallayers)andthiswillgive
youanapproximationofthetotalheightofthespecimen.Adjustthe
amountofsoilinthefollowinglayerssothatthefinalspecimenwill
be40.25in. (11)
Scarifythetopofeachcompactedlayertoadepthof1/8inwithanice
picktoinsureadequatebondwithfollowinglayers. 125
(12)Aftercompactingthelastlayer,measurefromthetopofthespecimen
tothetopofthecollarusingasteelrulewithO.Ol-inaccuracyand
recordonthedatasheet.
(13)Removethecollarandmold.Trimtheexcesssoilfromtheinsideof
themoldtomakethespecimenlevelacrossthetop.
(14)Weighthemoldwiththecompactedsampletothenearest0.1gand record.
(15)Extrudethesamplefromthemold.
(16)Breakthespecimenintofiveequalpartsandtakeanequalamountof
soilfromthecenterofeachportion.Placeallfiveportionsina
preweighedtareandweightothenearest0.01g.Placetareinoven
andobtainamoisturecontentthefollowingday.
(17)Repeatabovestepsforvaryingwatercontents,addingwaterasper
calculations.Donotrecompactsamples.
(18)Calculatedrydensityofspecimensandmoisturecontent.
WetDensityDryDensity= -.--+-;.:.M..:;.o';..-
s--7t"'::;u:";';'re;;";""':CC'L-
""-e-n-:-tontWeightofWater100%MoistureContent= WeightofSolidsx0
(19)Plotdataandselectoptimummoisturecontentforthepercentageof 1ime.
SampleProblem Given: Percentlime(byweight)required=6%
DesiredinitialH20content= 15% 126 H20contentofuntreatedsoil=10%
(determinedearlier) Calculations: TotalDesiredMixtureFormula:
LimeWaterSoilSolids + += 21009(willmakeapproximatelyfivesamples)
SolveforWs 1. 21W = 21009s W =1735.549 s = 0.06W = 104.139 Wl;me s
0.15W =260.339Wwater= s Check21009
ActualWaterRequired(consideringH20contentofnaturalsoil):
WaterinUntreatedSoil Ws = 1735.549(fromabove)
H20contentofuntreatedsoil= 10% 0.10(1735.54g)=
173.559ofH20naturalsoil 127 x watertoAddforDesiredH20Content
Weightofwaterdesired260.33g Weightofwaterinsoil- 173.55g
Weightofwatertoadd86.78g TotalSoil,Lime,andWaterRequired:
(1)SoilRequired Ws +WwaterUntreatedSoil= SoilRequired
1735.54g+173.55g=1909g (2)LimeRequired W =1049lime (3)WaterRequired
Wwater=879 orml WaterRequiredtoIncreaseMoistureContent:
No.SpecimensLeftinBatchxOriginalWs 5 % IncreaseDesired= WatertGAdd
Example(foradesired2-percentincrease,3specimensleftinbatch) ~
x1735.549x0.02=219 ormlofwater
Note:Actualmoisturecontentswillbehigherthancalculateddueto
lossofsoilduringfabrication. 128 SPECIMENFABRICATION(REF.105)
Theproceduregivenaboveisfollowedbyspecimenfabrication.Nomorethan
threespecimensmaybecompactedfromabatchofsoil/lime/watermixtureto
insurepropermixingandgoodqualitycontrol.Approximately1450g ofsoil
isrequiredforfabricationofthreespecimens.A moisturecontentistaken
fromtheuncompactedmixduringcompactionofeachspecimen.Eachspecimen
height,moisturecontent,anddrydensityisdeterminedandmustmeetthe
followingspecifications: SpecimenHei ght4+0.125in
MoistureContentOptimum!1% DryDensityMaximumDryDensity!2 lb/ft3
Thespecimensaretriplewrappedinthinplasticmembraneandtapedtopreventmoistureloss.
RAPIDCURE(REF.105)
Lime/soilspecimensareplacedinanovenfor30hr+15min.Theovenmust
becapableofholdingatemperatureof120,!2Fwithquicktemperaturerecoverywhenthedoorisopenedforremovalofspecimens.Aftercompletion
ofcuring,thespecimenisallowedtocoolfor15minpriortostrengthtestingand2hrpriortowaterimmersiontesting.Caremustbetakenduring
curetototallypreventspecimenmoistureloss.
FREEZE/THAW,DURABILITY(REF.'lOS)
Thistestisforthedeterminationofthechangeinunconfinedcompressive
strengthforcured2-in-diameterby4-in-highlime/soilspecimenswhichhave
beensubjectedtorepeatedcyclesofalternatefreezingandthawing.The
apparatus,usedconsistsof:(a)aconlmercialwidemouthvacuumflaskwith
aninternaldiameterofabout2.5inanddepthofabout6in;(b)aspecimenholderoflowthermalconductivityluciteforholdingthecylindrical
129
specimeninsidethevacuumflask.Thebaseofthespecimenholderwasperforatedtopermittheaccess'
ofwatertothebottomofthelime/soilspecimens;(c)demineralizedwater;(d)afreezermaintainedat22+2F.
Theprocedureforconductingthefreeze/thawdurabilitytestisasfollows:
(1)Thespecimensareplacedintheplasticspecimenholders.Thespecimenholdersaretheninsertedintothevacuumflasks.Enoughdemineral..izedwaterisplacedinthevacuumflaskssothatthebottom1/4inof
thelime/soilspecimenswillbeimmersedwhenplacedintheflasks.
Thiswaterlevelismaintainedthroughouttheentiretest.
(2)Thevacuumflasksandspecimensareplacedinthefreezer(22~ 2F)
for16hr.
(3)Afterthe16-hrfreezingperiod,thevacuumflasksareremovedfromthe
freezer.Thespecimensintheplasticholderareremovedfromtheflasks
andallowedtothawfor8hrat77+2F.Thebottom1/4inofthe
specimensremainimmersedinwaterduringthethawingperiod.Onefreeze/
thawcyclein16hroffreezingand8hrofthawing.
(4)Theprocessisrepeatedforthreecyclesoffreezingandthawing,after
whichthespecimenisremovedandtheunconfinedstrengthdetermined
(ASTM02166-66). LIMEREACTIVITY(REF.105)
Samplesatthreelimepercentages(pHestimatedlimepercent,+2percentand -
2percent)arepreparedusing2-in-diameterby4-in-highmoldsandthe
Vicksburgcompactionapparatus.Specimensarethoroughlywrappedtototally
preventmoisturelossandthenrapidcuredfor30hrat120F.Afterrapid
cureiscomplete,determinetheunconfinedcompressionstrength(ASTM02166-66).
Thesoilislimereactiveifthestrengthisinexcessof110psi.Should
lowerstrengthsresult,limetreatmentshouldnotbeused. 130 APPENDIXF
5515SOILSAMPLES Inthedevelopmentofanydesignmethodit
isdesirabletoincludeawide
varietyofmaterialswhicharerepresentativeofmosttypeslikelytobe
encounteredinpractice.It was,therefore,desiredtoutilizeawide
varietyofsoilsinthetesting.Thesoilsusedinthedevelopmentof
theAirForceSoilStabilizationIndexSystem(5515)aredescribedin
tables1through3.Examinationofthedatainthesetablesindicates
thewiderangeofsoilmaterialsused. 131
------------Table1.SoilsUsedinInitialValidationofSSIS(ref.103)
--Soil TuyHoa AltusSB Dyess AltusSG Ty1 er Houma PerrinB PerrinA
PerrinAB PanamaA PanamaB NorthCarolina DallasRegn'l WESClay
Buckshot Chenault Consistency LL*,%PI*,% 14.5 40.3 40.7 52.5 63.7
65.0 72.0 69.4 72.5 75.5 61.0 68.0 37.5 67.1 45.6 NP NP 23.2 19.8
21. 1 40.8 41. 7 40.0 43.3 32.8 35.5 26.9 50. 1 13.6 43.0 29.6 *LL=
LiquidLimit,PI= PlasticityIndex,Yd OMC= OptimumMoistureContent.
Moisture/DensitypH Yl,1b/ft3 OMC*,% -- - 5. 1 -- -7.4 102.719.77.4
97.723.67.5 91. 722.32.3 86.423.76.95 92.424.17.3 97.523.74.5
95.023.96.7 83.435. 15.3 82.835. 16.27 98.623.55.05 -- - 7.73
107.817.8 --- - --- - 7.70 = MaximumDryDensity, Classification
AASHOUnified A-1-b A-2-4 A-7-6{l2) A-7-6( 12) A-7- 5( 15) A-7-6(20)
A-7-6(20) A-7-6(20) A-7-6(20) A-7-6(20) A-6( 9) A-7-6(20) A-7-6(l7)
G SC CL CL OH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CL CH CH 132
Table2.LimeStabilizedSoils.AFACADValidation(ref.105) Soil Dyess
Altus Tyler Houma PerrinA PerrinB PerrinAB Bergstrom Carswell Ii
nker LeMoore Malmstrom Cannon Estiraodo. Ell i ngton Barksdale Ell
sworth Moody Robbins . Classification AASHOUnified A-7-6(l2)CL
A-7-6(12)CL . A.,. 7-5( 15)OH A-7-6( 20)CH A-7-6(20)CH A-7-6(20)CH
A-7-6(20_CH A-6(7)CL A-7-6(20)CH A-6CL A-7-6( 16)CH A-6CL A-1-bSM
A-7-5(8)CL A-7(20)CH. A-2-4CL-ML A-2-7SW-SC A-2-5SM A-2-4ML
Consistency AtterbergLimits LL*.%PI*.% 40.323.2 40.719.8 52.521. 1
63.740.8 72.030.0 65.041. 7 69.443.3 32.014. 1 48.618.6 30.012.0
58.433.4 34. 114.9 25.03.5 28.79.7 60.032.5 30.08.3 30.724.0
26.04.8 25.23.6 Moisture/DensitypH Yd*lb/ft 3 OMC*.% 102.719.77.40
97.723.67.50 91. 722.32.30 86.423.76.95 97.523,74.50 92.423.17.30
95.023.96.70 121. 9014.758.70 101.622.68.62 112.816.58.18 8.25 7.50
114.014.08.80 102.725.08.70 114.017. 18.53 8.83 8.00 8.95 *LL=
LiquidLimit.PI=PlasticityIndex.Yd=MaximumDryDensity. OMC=
OptimumMoistureContent 133
Table3.CementStabilizedSoils,AFACADValidation(ref.105) Soi]Cl ass
ifi cati on AASHOUnified ConsistencyMoisture/Density LL*,%PI*,% Yl,
lb/ft 3 OMC*,% pH TuyHoa Altus A-l-bNP5.10 SubbaseA-2-4SC14.5NP7.40
Dyess Altus A-7-640.323.2102.719.77.40
SubgradeA-7-6CL40.719.897.723.67.50 TylerA-7-5OH52.521.191.
722.32.30 HoumaA-7-6CH63.740.892.424.1 ;7.30 PerrinBA-7-6CH65.041.
792.424.17.30 PerrinA Clark Patrick Holloman Moody Robbi ns
Laughlin Charl eston Norton Vance Ell i ngton George.I Hami 1ton
Tinker Kelly A-7-6CH A-l-bSM-SC A-l-b A-l-b A-l-b A-2-7 A-6CL
A-l-aGW A-l-bSP A-l-b A-2-4SW A-3 A-4 A-6 A-7-5 _.72.040.097.523.7
NP117.211.2 NP 1 112 . 510.6 NP139.05.9 NP121.011.3
45.222.0122.611. 1 33.213.0105.018.7 NP125.09.8 NP102.516.9 NP8.4
126.29.0 118.012.5 27.45.7112.016.5 37.320.4107.918.6
82.045.289.020.0 4.50 * LL= LiquidLimit,PI= PlasticityIndex,Yd=
MaximumDryDensity, OMC= OptimumMoistureContent 134 APPENDIXG
CEMENTSTABILIZATIONPROCEDURES
Thisappendixprovidestheproceduresusedinthelaboratorytestingofsoil
stabilizationwithcement.Theseproceduresaretakendirectlyfromthel i t
~eraturecited.Thedataandproceduresdescribedinthisreportarebasedon
testinginaccordancewiththeseprocedures. 135
TESTFORpHOFSOIL/CEMENTMIXTURES(REF.103) Materials
Portlandcementtobeusedforsoilstabilization Apparatus
1.pHmeter(thepHmetermustbeequippedwithanelectrodehavingapH
rangeof14) 2.150-mlplasticbottleswithscrew-toplids
3.50-mlplasticbeakers 4.Di sti 11 edwater 5.Balance 6.Oven
7.Moisturecans Procedure
1.StandardizethepHmeterwithabuffersolutionhavingapHof12.00.
2.Weightothenearest0.01g,representativesamplesofair-driedsoil,
passingtheNo.40sieveandequalto25.0gofoven-driedsoil.
3.Pourthesoilsamplesinto150-mlplasticbottleswithscrew-toplids.
4.Add2.5gofthePortlandcement. 5.ThoroughlymixsoilandPortlandcement.
136 6.Addsufficientdistilledwatertomakeathickpaste.(C'aut10n:too
muchwaterwi
11reducett1epHand;producean7.Stirthesoil,cement,andwateruntilthoroughb1end1ngisachieved.
8.After15mi n,transferpartofthe:pastetoaplasti cbeakerandmeasure
thepH. 9.Ifthe pHis12.1orgreater,thesoilorganicmattercOntents.hou1d
not withthecementstabilizingmechanism.Todeterminethe requi
redpercentofcement,refertodes i gn methodsoutl tnedinsecti on
6ofthisreport. DETERMINATIONOFSULFATEINSOILS-
GRAVIMETRICMETHOD(REF.103) Scope Thismethodisapplicabletoallsoil
typ,eswiththeP9ssib1eexceptionof' soi 1scontai ni ngcertai n organi
ccompounds.Thi s . methodshou1 dp.ermi tthe ,'.'.
detectionofaslittle as0.05percent'sulfa.teas504, Reagents
1.Bar.iumch10r-ide,10-percentsoJutionofBaC1 2 . (Add 1m1of
2percentHe1toeach100mlofsolutionto.preventformationofcarbonate. )
2.Hydroch1ori caci d,2- sQ:1uti on- (0.55'N)
3...Magnesiumchloride,10-percentsolutionof'MgC1 2 .6H20.
4.Demineralizedwater 5.Silverriitrate,0.1Nsolution 137 Apparatus
1.Beaker,1000ml 2.Burnerandringstand 3.Filteringflask,500ml
4.Buchnerfunnel,9cm 5.FilterNo. 40,9 cm
6.Filterpaper,WhatmanNo.42,9cm 7.Saranwrap
8.Crucible,ignition,oraluminumfoil,heavygrade 9.Analyticalbalance
10.Aspiratororothervacuumsource Procedure
(1)Selectarepresentativesampleofair-driedsoilweighingapproximately
10g.Wetgh.tothenearest0.01g.(Note:Whensulfatecontentis
anticipatedtobelessthanO.1percent,asampleweighing20gormore
maybeused.)(Themoisturecontentoftheair-driedsoilmustbeknown
forlaterdeterminationof.dryweightofthesoil.)
(2)Boilfor1-1{2hrinbeakerwithmixtureof300mlwaterand15mlHel.
(3)FilterthroughWhatmanNo.40paper,washwithhotwater,dilutecombinedfiltrateandwashingsto50ml.
(4)Take100mlofthissolutionandaddMgC1 2
solutionuntilnomoreprecipitateisformed. 138
(5)FilterthroughWhatmanNo.42paper.washwithhotwater.dilutecom..
binedfiltrateandwashingsto200ml.
(6)Heat100mlofthissolutiontoboilingandaddBaC1 2 solutionvery
slowlyuntilnomoreprecipitateisformed.Continueboilingfor about5
minandletstandovernightinwarmplace.coveringbeaker wi thSaranwrap.
.' (7)FilterthroughWhatmanNo.42paper.Washwithhotwateruntilfree
fromchlorides(filtrateshouldshownoprecipitatewhenadropof AgN03
solutionisadded).
(8)Dryfilterpaperincrucibleoronsheetofaluminumfoil.Ignite
paper.WeighresidueonanalyticalbalanceasBaS04. Calculation
P0WeightofResidue4116ercentS4=Oven-DryWeightofInitialSamplex. where
oven-dryweightofinitialsample=Air-DryWeightofInitialSample
1+Air-DryMoistureContent(percent)100percent
Note:Ifprecipitatedfromcoldsolution.bariumsulfateissofinelyd i s
~persedthatit
cannotberetainedwhenfilteringbytheabovemethod.Precipitationfromawarm.dilutesolutionwillincreasecrystalsize.Dueto
theabsorption(occlusion)ofsolublesaltsduringtheprecipitationof
BaS04 asmallerror isintroduced.Thiserrorcanbeminimizedbypermitting
theprecipitatetodigestinawarm.dilutesolutionforanumberofhours.
ThisallowsthemoresolublesmallcrystalsofBaS04todissolveandrecrystallizeonthelargercrystals.
139 DETERMINATIONOFSULFATEINSOILS- TURBIDIMETRICMETHOD(REF.103)
Reagents
1.Bariumchloridecrystals(Grindanalyticalreagentgradebariumchloride
topassl-mmsieve.)
2.Ammoniumacetatesolution(0.5N)(Adddilutehydrochloricaciduntil
thesolutionhasapHof4.2.) 3.Distilledwater Apparatus 1.Moisturecan
2.Oven 3.200-mlbeaker 4.Burnerandringstand 5.Fil teri ngfl ask
6.Buchnerfunnel,9cm 7.Fi 1terpaper,WhatmanNo.40,9cm 8.Vacuumsource.
. 9.Spectrophotometerandstandardtubes(BauschandLombeSpectronic20or
equivalent) 10.pHmeter 140 Procedure
(1)Takearepresentativesampleofair-driedsoilweighingapproximately
10gandweightothenearest0.01g.(Themoisturecontentofthe
air-driedsoilmustbeknownforlaterdeterminationofdryweightof
thesoil.)
(2)AddtheaR11lOniumacetatesolutiontothesoil.(Theratioofsoilto
solutionshouldbeapproximately1:5byweight.) (3)Boilforabout5 min.
(4)FilterthroughWhatmanNo.40filterpaper.Iftheextractingsolution
isnotclear,filteragain.
(5)Take10m1ofextractingsolution(thismayvarydependingontheconcentrationofsulfateinthesolution)anddilutewithdistilledwater
toabout40m1.Addabout0.2gofbariumchloridecrystalsanddilute
tomakethevolumeexactly50m1.Stirfor1min.
(6)Immediatelyafterthestirringperiodhasended,pouraportionofthe
solutionintothestandardtubeandinsertthetubeintothecellofthe
spectrophotometer.Measuretheturbidityat30-secintervalsfor4min.
Maximumturbidityisusuallyobtainedwithin2minandthereadingsremainconstantthereafterfor3to10min.Considertheturbiditytobe
themaximumreadingobtainedinthe4-mininterval.
(7)Comparetheturbidityreadingwithastandardcurveandcomputethesulfateconcentration(asS04)intheoriginalextractingsolution.(The
standardcurveissecuredbycarryingouttheprocedurewithstandard
potassiumsulfatesolutions.)
(8)Correctionshouldbemadefortheapparentturbidityofthesamplesby
runningblanksinwhichnobariumchlorideisadded. 141 SampleProblem
Given: Weightofair-driedsample= 10.12g WaterContent= 9.36%
Weightofdrysoil= 9.27g Totalvolumeofextractingsolution= 39.1ml
10mlofextractingsolutionwasdilutedto50mlafteraddition
ofbariumchloride(step5).Thesolutiongaveatransmission readingof81.
Calculations:
Fromthestandardcurve,atransmissionreadingof81corresponds
to16.0ppm(fig.1).Therefore,concentrationoforiginalextractingsolution=16.0x5=
80.0ppm. -- 80.0 x 39.1x 100%PercentS04=1000x1000x9.27= 0.0338
DeterminationofStandardCurve:
(1)Preparesulfatesolution.of0,4,8,12,16,20,25,30,35,40,
45,50ppminseparatetesttubes.Thesulfatesolutionismade
frompotassiumsulfatesaltdissolvedin0.5N arnnoniulTIacetate
(withpHadjustedto4.2). (2)Continuesteps5and6oftheprocedure.
(3)Drawstandardcurveasshowninfigure1byplottingtransmission
readingsforknownconcentrationsofsulfatesolutions. 142 10 0 1 r - -
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .~\90- 0\
80:--+---\ .. I0s:: o .,... VI VI .,... 70E :\VI s:: ~ 277psi
Thelaboratory28-dayqumustbe369psitodeveloptherequiredfieldstrength
of110psiafterfivefreeze/thawcycles.(Note:Foraplantmix.operation,the
laboratorystrengthrequirementwouldbereducedto249psibecauseofincreased
mixingefficiencyandreducedfieldvariability.)
Thepavementdesignershouldbecognizantthattheprecedinganalysishasbeen
concernedwithpavementresponsetorepeateddynamicwheelloadings;thatis,
flexuralfatiguewasthemainconsideration.Itisrecognizedthatstabilized
pavementsectionsdevelopultimatestrengthfarinexcessofthestressesthat
. ,
leadtoinitialcracking(ref.138).Forasituationwherelowtrafficvolumesareanticipated,therequiredstrengthsofstabilizedlayersmaybe
166
significantlyoverestimatedbyfigures1through4.Examinationofthedata
presentedbySuddathandThompson(ref.l3S)indicatesthatultimatestrengths
maybeatleasttwotothreetimesaslargeasthosepredictedbyMeyerhof's
ultimateloadtheory.Clearly,forthesesituations,thedesignerisjustifiedinacceptinglowerstrengthsthanthoseindicatedbyfigures1through
4. 167 REFERENCES
1.IIAirportPavementDesignandEvaluation,1IAdvisoY'YCiY'culaY'3ACNo.150/
5320-6B,FAA,DepartmentofTransportation,May28,1974.
2.Grim,R.E.,ClayMineY'alogy,McGraw-HillBookCo.,SecondEdition,1968.
3.Tourtelot,HarryA.,IIGeologicOriginandDistributionofSwellingClays,1I
PY'oceedingsof aWOY'kshoponExpansiveClaysandShalesinHighwayDesign
andConstY'uction,D.R.LambandS.J.Hanna,editors,Vol.1,May1973,
pp.44-69.
4.Snethan,DonaldR.,Townsend,FrankC.,Johnson,L.D.,Patrick,DavidM.,
andVedros,PhillipJ.,AReviewof EngineeY'ingExpeY'ienceswithExpansive
SoilsinHighwaySubgY'ades,ReportNo.FHWA-RD-75-48,U.S.ArmyEngineer
WaterwaysExperimentStation,Vicksburg,Miss.,June1975,139p.
5.Fo"lks,JamesJ.,SoilSUY'veyof SantaFeNewMexico,UnitedStates
DepartmentofAgriculture,August1975.
6.Woodward-ClydeandAssociates,AReviewPapeY'onExpansiveClaySoils,
Vol.1,LosAngeles,California,1968. 7.Noble,C.A.,IIS we
llingMeasurementsandPredictionofHeaveforLacustrine
Clays,"CanadianGeotechnicalJouY'nal,Vol.3,No.1,February1966,pp.
32-41. 8.Lambe,T.William,and RobertV.,liTheRoleofEffectiveStress
intheBehaviorofExpansiveSoils,"QuaY'teY'lyoftheColoY'adoSchoolof
Mines,Vol.54,No.4,October1959,pp.33-65. 9.Johnson,L.D.,Reviewof
LiteY'atuY'eonExpansiveClaySoils,Misc.Paper
S-69-24,U.S.ArmyEngineerExperimentStation,Vicksburg,Miss.,
June1969,48p.
10.Seed,H.B.,Mitchell,J.K.,andChan,C.K.,IIStudiesofSwellandSwell
PressureCharacteristicsofCompactedClay,"HighwayReseaY'chBoaY'dBuUetinNo.313,1962,pp.12-29.
11.Budge,W.D.,Schuster,R.L.,andSampson,E.,AReviewof LiteY'atuY'eon
SwellingSoils,UniversityofColorado,1964.
12.Low,PhillipF.,"FundamentalMechanismsInvolvedinExpansionofClays
asParticularlyRelatedtoClayrlineralogy,1IPY'oceedingsof
aWOyikshopon
ExpansiveClaysandShalesinHighwayDesignandConstY'uction,Vol.1,
May1973,pp.70-91.
13.Means,R.E.,"BuildingonExpansiveClays,"QuaY'teY'lyoftheColoY'ado
Schoolof Mines,Vol.54,No.4,October1959,pp.1-32.
14.Lytton,R.L.,Theol'yof Moistul'eMovementinExpansivectays,Research
Report118-1,CenterforHighwayResearch,UniversityofTexas,Austin,
Texas,September1969,161p. 168 i... ' 15.Scho1ander,P.F.,"0smoti
cMeehani smandNegati vePressure,"science,
Vol.158,No.3805,Dece!J1ber1967,p.'1210.
16.Bolt,G.H.,"Physico-ChemicalAnalysisoftheCompressibilityofPure
Clays,"Geotechnique,Vol.6,1956,pp.86-93.
17.Ruiz,C.L.,"OsmoticInterpretationoftheSwellingofExpansiveSoils,"
HighwayReseapchBoapdBulletinNo.313,1962,pp.47-77.
18.Baver,L.D.,andWinterkorn,H.F.,"SorptionofLiquidsbySoilColloids,"
SoilScience,Vol.40,1935,pp.403-419.
19.Baver,L.D.,SoilPhysics,JohnWileyandSons,Inc.,SecondPrinting,1959.
20.Salas,J.A.J.,andSerratosa,J."FoundationsonSwellingClays,"
ppoceedingsof the4thInternationalConferenceonSoilMechanicsand
FoundationEngineeping,Vol.I,London,1957,pp.424-428.
21.Haliburton,T.Allan,and B.Dan,"SubgradeMoistureVariationsin
ExpansiveSoils,"Proceedingsof theSecondIntepnationalConfepenceon
ExpansiveClaySoils,TexasA&MPress,1969,pp.291-307.
22.Redlich,K.A.,Terzaghi,K.,andKampe,R.,Ingeniepgeolgie(Engineering
Geo logy),Spri nger,Vi enna,1929.
23.Gilboy,Glennon,liTheCompressibilityofMixtures,"ppoceedings,
ASCE,Vol.V,No.2,February1928,pp.555-568.
24.Hardy,R.M.,"IdentificationandPerformanceofSwellingSoilTypes,"
CanadianGeotechnicalJournal,Vol.11,No.2,May1965,pp.141-161.
25.Compton,PhilV.,AStudyof theSwellingBehaviopof AnExpansiveClay
asInfluencedbytheClay SoilandExtepnal
Loading,AFWL-TR-70-26,AirForceWeaponsLaboratory,KirtlandAirForce
Base,NewMexico,June1970,135p. 26.Pearring,JeromeR.,AStudyof Basic
andEngineepingIndexppopeptiesofLatePiticSoils,AFWL-TR-69-21,Air
ForceWeaponsLaboratory,KirtlandAirForceBase,NewMexico,May1969,136
p...
27.Rich,C.I.,andKunze,G.W.,(ed.),SoilClayMinepalogy,Universityof
NorthCarolinaPress,Raleigh,NorthCarolina,1964.
28.DeBruyn,C.M.A.,Collins,L.E.,andWilliams,A.B.A.,liTheSpecific
Surface,WaterAffinityandPotentialExpansivenessofClays,"ClayMinepalsBulletin,Vol.3,No.17,August1956,pp.120-128.
29.Diamond,S.,andKinter,E.B.,"Sur faceAreasofClayMineralsasDerived
fromMeasurementsofGlycerolRetention,
IIFifthNationalConfepenceonClaysandClayMinepals,Publication566,NationalAcademyof
Sciences,NationalResearchCouncil,1958,pp.334-347. 169
30.Taylor,A.W.,"Physico-CheillicalPropertiesofSoils:IonExchange
Phenomena,"JournaloftheSoilMechanicsandFoundationsDivision,
ASCE,Vol.85,No.SM2,Pt.1,April1959,pp.19-30.
31.Basu,R.,andArulanandan,K.,"ANewApproachfortheIdentificationof
SwellPotentialofSoils,"Proceedingsof aWorkshoponExpansiveClays
andShalesinHighwayDesignandConstruction,D.R.LambandS.J.Hanna,
editors,May1973,pp.315-339.
32."SignificanceofTestsforHighwayt1aterials- BasicTests,"Progress
ReportoftheCommitteeonSignificanceofTestsforHighwayMaterials
oftheHighwayDivision,Journalof theHighwayDivision,ASCE,No.HW4,
September1957,pp.1385-1to1385-37.
33.Vijayvergiya,V.N.,andGhazzaly,Osman1.,"PredictionofSwellingPotentialforNaturalClays,"Proceedingsof
theThirdInternationalCon
onExpansiveClaySoils,Haifa,Israel,1973,pp.227-236.
34.Vijayvergiya,V.N.,andSullivan,R.A.,"SimpleTechniqueforIdentifyingHeavePotential,"Proceedingsof
aWorkshoponExpansiveClaysand ShalesinHighwayDesignand
D.R.LambandS.J.Hanna, editors,May1973,pp.275-294.
35.Komornik,Amos,andDavid,David,"PredictionofSwellingPressurein
Clays,"JournaloftheSoilMechanicsandFoundationsDivision,ASCE,
Vol.95,No.SM1,January1969,pp.209-225.
36.Dawson,RaymondF.,"ModernPracticesUsedintheDesignofFoundations
forStructuresonExpansi veSoil s," oftheColoradoSchoolof
Mines,Vol.54,No.4,October1959,pp.66-88.
37.Seed,H.B.,Woodward,R.J.,andLundgren,Raymond,"PredictionofSwellingPotentialforCompactedClays,"
oftheSoilMechanicsand
FoundationsDivision,ASCE,Vol.88,No.SM3,Part1,June1962,pp.53-87.
38.IIGui detotheUseoftheSo; 1PVCMeter,"TechnicalStudiesNo.595,
FederalHousingAdministration,January1965,31p.
39.Lambe,T.William,TheCharacterandIdentificationof ExpansiveSoils,
TechnicalStudiesReportNo.701,FederalHousingAdministration,Washington,D.C.,December1960.
40.Krazynski,LeonardM.,"TheNeedforUniformityinTestingofExpansive
Soil s, IIProceedingsof aWorkshoponExpansiveClaysandShalesinHighway
Designand Vol.I,May1973,pp.98-136.
41.RecommendedPracticeforConstructionof ResidentialConcreteFloorson
ExpansiveSoil,Vol.II,PortlandCementAssociation,September1971,39p.
42.Skernpton,A.W.,"TheColloidalActivityofClay,"ProceedingsoftheThird
InternationalConferenceonSoilMechanicsandFoundationEngineering,Vol.
1,1953,pp.57-61. 43.Holtz,
G.,andGibbs,H.J.,"EngineeringPropertiesofExpansiveClays,"
Transactions,ASCE,Vol.121,1956,pp.641-663. 1j' ()
44.Altmeyer,T.,DiscussionofPaperbyHoltzandGibbson"EngineeringPropertiesofExpansiveClays,IITroansaotions,ASCE,Vol.121,1956,.
pp.664-666.
45.Grossman,R.B.,Brasher,B.R.,Franzmeier,D.P.,andWalker,J.L.,
"LinearExtensibilityasCalculatedfromNaturalClodDryBulkDensityMeasurements,"Proooeedings,Vol.32,SoilScienceSocietyofAmerica,
1968,pp.570-573. 46.Yoder,EldonJ.,Reviewof
SoilClassifioationSystemsApplioabletoAiroporotPavementDesign,FAA-RD-73-169,FederalAviationAdministration,
May1974,123p.
47.EngineeroingSoilClassifioationforoResidentialDevelopments,Comp"ll
edand editedbytheFederalHousingAdministration,November1961,168p.
48.Kantey,B.A.,andBrink,A.B.A.,LaboroatoroyCroiteroiaforotheReoognitionof
ExpansiveSoils,BulletinNo.9,NationalBuildingResearchInstitute,SouthAfricanCouncilforScientificandIndustrialResearch,December1952.
49.Holtz,W.G.,"ExpansiveClays-PropertiesandProblems,1IQuaroterolyof
the ColoroadoSohoolof Mines,Vol.54,No.4,October1959,pp.89-126.
50.Williams,A.A.B.,DiscussiononJ.E.B.JenningsandK.Knight'spaper,liThePredictionofTotalHeavefromtheDoubleOedometerTest,"TroansaotionsSouthAfroioanofCivilEngineeros,Vol.8,No.6,
June1958.
51.McDowell,Chester,"InterrelationshipofLoad,VolumeChange,andLayerThicknessesofSoilstotheBehaviorofEngineeringStructures,"Proooeedings,HRE,Vol.35,1956,pp.754-772.
52.Lambe,T.William,The.Chal'aoteroandIdentifioationof
ExpansiveSoils,
TechnicalStudiesReportNo.701,FederalHousingAdministration,
Washington,D.C.,May1960.
53.Ladd,CharlesC.,andLambe,T.William,liTheIdentificationandBehavior
ofCompactedExpansiveClays,1IProooeedingsofthe5thInteronationalConferoenoeonSoilMeohaniosandFoundationEngineeroing,Vol.I,Paris,1961,
pp.201-205.
54.Ranganatham,B.,andSatyanarayana,B.,"ARationalMethodofPredicting
SwellingPotentialforCompactedExpansiveClays,"Pr'oaeedings,8thIntc:tnationalConferenoeonSoilMeohaniosandFoundationEnginee:ting,Vol.1,1965,pp.92-96.
55.Chen,FuHua,liTheUseofPierstoPreventtheUpliftingofLightlyLoaded
StructuresFoundedonExpansiveSoils,"Engineer'ingEffea1;Bof
Mo7..atufle
ChangesinSoils(ConoludingProoeedingsoftheInteronationalReBeaflahand
EngineeroingConfer'enoeonExnansiveClay TexasA&MUnivers1ty,1965,
pp.152-171. 'ill
56.Packard,RobertG.,"DesignofConcreteAirportPavement,"Engineering
Bulletin,PortlandCementAssociation,1973,61p.
57.Fernando,Jonas,Smith,Robert,andAru1anandan,K.,"NewApproachto
DeterminationofExpansionIndex,"JournaloftheGeotechnicalDivision,
ASCE,September1975,pp.1003-1008.
58.Seed,H.B.,Mitchel,J.K.,andChan,C.K.,"StudiesofSwellandSwell
PressureCharacteristicsofCompactedC1ays,"HighwayResearchBoard
BulletinNo.313,1962,pp.13-29. 59.Fredu1 und,D.G.,"Conso1i
dometerTestProceduralFactorsAffecti ngSwell Properti es,
IIProceedingsof
theSecondInternationalConferenceonExpansiveClaySoils,TexasA&r,lPress,1969,pp.435-456..
60.Ring,G.W.,"Shrink-SwellPotentialofSoi1s,"PublicRoads,Vol.33,
No.6,1965,pp.97-105.
61.Heidema,P.B.,liTheBar-linearShrinkageTestandthePracticalImportance
ofBar-linearShrinkageasanIdentifierofSoi1s,"Proceedingsof the4th
InternationalConferenceonSoilMechanicsandFoundationEngineering,Vol.
I,1957,pp.44-49. 62.Taylor,DonaldW.,Fundamentalsof
SoilMechanics,JohnWileyandSons, Inc.,FourthPrinting,1965.
63.Gibbs,HaroldJ.,"UseofConso1idometerforMeasuringExpansionPotential
ofSoi 1S, IIProceedingsof
aWorkshoponExpansiveClaysandShalesinHighwayDesignandConstruction,Vol.1,May1973,pp.206-213.
64.Goris,J.,"PressuresAssociatedwithSwellinginSoils,"MasterofScience
Thesis,UniversityofA"lberta,1965.
65.Jennings,J.E.,liThePredictionofAmountandRateofHeaveLikelytobe
Experi encedinEng i neeri ngCons tructi ononExpans i veSoil s,
IIProceedings of
theSecondInternationaZConferenceonExpansiveClaySoils,TexasA&M
Press,1969,pp.99-109.
66.Lambe,T.William,liTheStructureofCompactedC1ay,"Journalof theSoil
MechanicsandFoundationsDivision,ASCE,Vol.84,No.SM2,Part1,May
1958,pp.1654-1to1654-34.
67.Lytton,R.L.,Boggess,R.L.,andSpotts,J.W.,"Characteristicsof
ExpansiveClayRoughnessofPavements,"PaperpresentedtotheTransportationResearchBoard,January1975.
68.Williams,A.A.B.,liTheDeformationofRoadsResultingfromChangesinExpansiveSoilsinSouthAfrica,"Sympos.iuminPrint,Butterworths,1965,pp.143-155.
69.Aitchison,G.D.,andWoodburn,J.A.,"Soi1SuctioninFoundationDesign,"
Proceedingsofthe7thInternationalConferenaeonSoilMechaniasand
FoundationEngineering,Vol.2,MexicoCity,1969,pp.1-8. 172
70.Al-Dhahir,Z.A.,andTan,S.B.,"ANoteonOne-DimensionalConstant-Hea