Desertification in NW part of India : key issues Pratap Chandra Moharana,Principal Scientist and Fulbright Fellow, [email protected]
Desertification in NW part of India : key issues
Pratap Chandra Moharana,Principal Scientist and Fulbright Fellow, [email protected]
Desertification, which is considered a major threat in the drylands of the world, is not
about advancing boundaries of the existing deserts, but about land degradation in the
arid, semi-arid and the dry sub-humid regions, which together form the drylands.
Desertification usually takes place
when the rates of natural geomorphic processes in the drylands
are accelerated by human action or through extreme natural events
like long term droughts, high-intensity rains, tectonic disturbances,
etc.
Our experiences :
• Terrain features can be used as state indicators of desertification, provided
we understand the spatial pattern of process-form interactions, and
vulnerability of the landscape.
• The occurrence of nebkhas in sandy plains is now recognized as a good
indicator of recent sand deposition (Nickling and Wolfe, 1994; Tengberg,
1995; Kar, 2006).
Great Rann of Kachchh
and Little Rann
Kachchh Mainland
Saurashtra upland
ARID
SEMI-
ARID
Thar Desert : Geomorphic Provinces
Agro-climatic Zones of western Rajasthan Morpho-edaphic Characteristics
IA Arid western plain Sandy plains and major dune fields, thick sand with CaCO3 horizon at varying depths, <250
mm rainfall zone
IB Irrigated north-western plain Canal irrigated leveled sandy plains, CaCO3 horizon, <300 mm rainfall zone
IIA Transitional plains of inland drainage Sandy alluvial plains, shallow to deep soils, irrigated with well/tube well, 300-450 mm zone
IIB Transitional plain of Luni basin Alluvial plains of Luni & its tributaries , 300 – 500 mm rainfall zone
Wind erosion and Aeolian activity in western part of Rajasthan : some key points
• Arid zone covers about 12% of the country's geographical area
• Western part of Rajasthan shares about 62% of hot arid region in India.
• Out of Country’s120 M ha degraded lands, Wind erosion affects 12.40 M ha area
• 3.76 M ha agricultural lands suffer from loss of top soil • ~ 71% area of western Rajasthan has been mapped under wind erosion
• Aeolian activity in this region is a measure of the strength and duration ofwind, sand supply, rainfall, vegetation cover and land surface conditions
• Aeolian activity is more effective during summer months due to persistentSSW & SW blowing of strong hot wind for days together that causes sandstorms.
• The wind and sand dynamics cease with the arrival of monsoon rains.
• Low and erratic precipitation (100 - 420 mm/year)
• High evapotranspiration (1500-2000 mm/year).
West
ern
Raja
sthan :
the r
egio
nal vari
abilit
y
• Human population trend (1961 – 2011) : +194%
( 37/ km2 – 108/ km2)
• Livestock population : 1961 – 2003 : +72%
(66/ km2 – 113/ km2)
• Human population
trend : 1961 – 2011 :
+194% ( 37 /km2 –
108/ km2)
• Livestock population :
1961 – 2003 : +72%
(66 /km2 – 113/ km2)
High human pressure
Climatic variability
Water scarcity limits the production of crops, forage, wood
ANIMAL BASED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY
(Crops-Trees/Grasses-Livestock)
Intensive cultivation
Overgrazing and Deforestation
Exploitation of resources
DESERTIFICATION
Landuse/landcover changes in Western Rajasthan
2005-06
Interpreted from FCCs of IRS-L3 satellite images of 2005-06Data used : FCCs of IRS-1C/1D satellite images of 1994-95
1996-97
Land use (2005-06)
Area (%)
Land use (in 90’s)
Area (%)
Croplands (Irrigated) : +8.69%
Wastelands : - 9.62%
Prosopis Cineraria : the mainstay of
Agro-forestry for rural livelihood
Tree , Fuel, Loong
Sand Dunes are croplands to the land owner
The future of Sandy uplands in western Rajasthan : Intensive vs Subsistence systems
Tractorization : Disturbing the dune morphology for sand movement
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
Current fallowArea (ha)
1991 2001 2011
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
Net area sown (ha)
1991 2001 2011
Comparative
statistics
For
1991, 2001
and 2011
Decline in land
fallowing in
almost all
districts
Increase in net
sown area in
ACZ-I & II
And
Negligible or no
change in
ACZ –III & IV
0
5
10
15
20
9.519.02 97.54
10.4312.17
14.09
2.41
16.3614.93
16.1916.61
Total Cropped Area
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
Total_Irrigated_Area (ha)1992-2006
BRM : Barmer, JSM : Jaisalmer, BKN : Bikaner, CHU: Churu, JOD : Jodhpur, GNG: Ganganagar, HNG: Hanumangarh, NAG: Nagaur, JHU: Jhunjhunun, SIK: Sikar, JAL: Jalor, PAL: Pali
Agro-climate wise Distribution of Sand Dunes & Croplands in western Rajasthan
Sand Dunes : 48% area of western Rajasthan
Irrigation advantage through IGNP canal , Tubewell & Khadin
Khadins
Tube well irrigation
IGNP canal system
2073 km network of canals in Mohangarh-Sadaru-Arjana-Sultana-Nachna
25.88 % area : ground water irrigationthrough 2,283 tube wells and pumpingsets
Cultivation on the conserved moisturethough ‘Khadin’. ~ 500 khadins in the
district.
Chandan-Sodakor-Lathi-SankraBharamsar-Roopsi
Total Irrigated Area:
1,91,796 ha
IGNP- 141674 ha
other sources-50123
ha
About 5000 ha area has been put under Pomegranate during 2010 – 2015 in
the above villages.
2009
2013
• Saline water irrigated crops : advantage over
sweet water for less insects,
• 8-10 irrigation/day,
• 500-800 trees/ha,
• 25-30 kg fruit/5 year old tree)
• Cost of input : 2 lakh / year,
• Tree spacing : 3 x 5 ft and also 12 x 15 ft,
• Anar as a fruit tree : 5-7 years good fruiting
• Seedlings provided from Gujarat traders : Rs.15/30
/tree
• Has replaced Arendi and Jeera
• Till 2009-2010, the area was a typical sandy
terrain with rainfed crops only
• Consultation fee : Rs. 15 / tree
• Indrana Jeera was a household name in the market
Changing
concept of
agriculture
in western
Rajasthan
Erosion/deposition
classArea (Km2)
Percentage of
total area
Very severe 5800 2.78
Severe 25540 12.23
Moderate 73740 35.32
Slight 52690 25.24
Negligible 50981 24.43
Source : CAZRI(2000).Wind erosion in western Rajasthan.
Croplands
Very
Severe
Severe Moderate Slight Negligible
Irrigated --- PokaranNawalgarh,
Sanchore
Chirawa,
Osiyan
Merta,
Degana
Rainfed
Jaisalmer,
Chohatan
Bikaner,
Phalodi
Nokha,
ShergarhJodhpur Nagaur
Wind erosion index:
a reliable measure for understanding the spatial pattern
of sand mobility based on threshold wind velocity and
PET for the period of strong sand shifting wind
(March to July).
Western Rajasthan
Wind Erosion
Aerosol Optical Thickness (AOT)
more is the AOT, greater is the dust concentration
AOT maps reveal dust aerosol was more active in the west of Jaisalmer
Source : MODIS aerosol level 2 product, MOD04_L2)
LocationWind erosioncategory
Annual soil loss
rate (t ha-1 yr-1)
Khuiyala Farmer’s field (Dune Covered)Jaisalmer district
Very severe 83.3
Bikaner Research Farm, CAZRI Severe 50.0
Jaisalmer Research Farm, CAZRI Moderate 12.2
Bhujawar Farmer’s field, Jodhpur Slight 1.3
Place / Terrain Measurement
Shergarh/Sand dune Erosion of 0.2 mm size sand grains @46 kg/m2 / hr Ramakrishna et al.1990
Pokaran/isolated barchan Movement of 2.25 m barchan by 1.70 m / 3 days /wind speed : 29 kmph (Kar, 1994)
Bikaner, Jodhpur &
Jaisalmer / cropland
Erosion from bare soil at Bikaner : 273.7 kg/ha/day,
Erosion from loamy sand soil with clod formation at Jodhpur : 15.6 kg/ha/day
Sandy soil at Chandan(Jaisalmer): 76.7 kg/ha/day during wind speed 29 kmph (Gupta, 1993)
Bikaner / cropland Soil loss during a prolonged sand storm
Bare soil : 1449 t/ha
Crop field (with 45 cm high Pearlmillet stubble): 22 t/ha (Gupta 1993)
Jodhpur / cropland
Chandan / sandy plain
Mean soil loss during 22 –day long sand storm, June 1985
Sandy plains, deep ploughed :: 2837 t/ha (3 sites)
Soils under 8-12 per cent natural vegetation cover) : 472 t/ha
Field cleared of vegetation : deflation of 15-18 cm (3100-3700 t/ha)
Dhir et al., 19
Rece
nt
Experi
ments
and F
indin
gs
Measu
red
so
il lo
ss d
ue t
o W
ind
ero
sio
n b
y C
AZ
RI sc
ien
tist
s
Erosion / deposition features Signature on satellite image FCCs
Sand sheets, fence line hummocks Uniform whitish or light pale brown color
Fresh sand deposits on old and stable sand dunes Bright white tone of reactivated sand and light yellow on stable surface
Fresh sand deposits on sand ridges Medium white tone with dull redness because of cultivation
Brachans or low dunes Bright white tone
TerrainAverage rainfall (mm)
Major FIELD indicators for assessment Severity
Flat sandy plains with dominantly loamy sand to sandy loam soil
100-550Fresh sand sheet ~ 30 cm thick; few scattered new fence line hummocks and nebkhas(~ 100 cm high)
Slight
Moderately sandy undulating plains and sand dunes with loamy sand soils; thickly sand sheeted plains
> 300Reactivated fresh sand ( 50 to 150 cm thickness on stable dunes) , sandy plains and fence line hummocks; recently formed nebkhas
Moderate
Moderately sandy undulating plains and sand dunes with sand to loamy sand soils
< 300
Reactivated and fresh sandy hummocks (nebkhas) sand ridges of 90-300 cm height; sand sheets of 60-150 cm thickness between undulations; reactivated stable dunes with fresh sand deposits of 70 to 200 cm thickness;
Exposed plant roots to a depth of 40 to 100 cm in the sandy plains indicate erosion
Moderate
Moderate to strongly undulating sandy plains with closely spaced hummocks and high sand dunes with sand to loamy sand soils
100-550
Closely spaced sandy hummocks and sand ridges of 1 to 4 m height with fresh sandcover; sand deposits of 100-300 cm thickness usually present between undulations;highly reactivated sand dunes with fresh sand and superimposed crescent bedformsof 2 to 4 m height
Severe
Barchan dunes and very thick sandy plains with loose sand throughout the profile
100-550Areas of drift sand, especially as fields of barchans of 2 to 5 m height, which encroach upon roads, settlements and agricultural fields; also areas with very closely spaced nebkhas of 2-5 m height
Very severe
INDICATORS
Shelterbelts have varied effects in reducing wind velocity depending upon plant species, structure, height, length and density. However,
studies (CAZRI, 2006) indicates improved mico-climate, soil quality and increased crop productivity in irrigated area covered with
shelter belt plantation.
August 2009 January 2012
November 2009 November 2013
Sh
elt
er
Belt
Str
ate
gy t
o c
heck b
low
n s
an
d a
cti
vit
ies
San
d D
un
e S
tab
iliz
ati
on
/ W
ind
Bre
aks
• Fencing of the area• Establishment of micro-wind breaks on the wind ward side (5 m chess board or in 5 m parallel
strips)
• Sowing of grasses and transplanting of trees and shrubs with onset of monsoonLocal shrubs / bushwood materials : Khimp (Leptadenia pyrotechnica), Pala (Ziziphus numularia), Sania
(Crotalaria burhia and Murah (Panicum turgidum)
Tree species : Acacia tortilis, Acacia senegal, Tamarix articulata
Grasses : Lasirus sindicus, Cenchurus ciliaris
Creepers : Citrullus colocynthis
KHARDA
• Croplands degraded due to Industrial
effluent along the Bandi river (1-2 km
extent) : 1880 ha (15 % of study area)
• No crops in all the seasons, croplands
infested with P.Juliflora
• Land degraded due to salinity developed
around reservoir : 1124.67 ha (9% of study
area)
Zaid
Rabi
Khar
if
Com
bati
ng D
ese
rtif
icati
on
Mic
ro W
ate
rshed o
f K
akniN
adi,
west
of
Jais
alm
er
Lodorv
a-M
uls
agar-
Jiy
ar-
Kuld
hara
-Dam
odara
Legend
Rocky Structural Plains/Hamada
Rocky Uplands/Ridges
Rocky Pediments Dissected with Gullies
Rocky Gravelly Plains
Desert Pavements with Shallow Soil
Shallow Allluvial/Colluvial Plain
Flat Depressions/Khadins
Low Lying Plains
Sandy Uplands/Sand Dunes
Highly Eroded Mines Area
Settlements
Ephemeral Streams
Major Land Units for
Combating Desertification
At a Micro catchment scale
Manpiya
Climate change, Environment,
Implications
• More short duration high
intensity rain events
• warming trend
• increased dryness
• higher wind speed
• and higher evaporative
demands by the plants
Possible Implication
Would make
the desert and its eastern margin
more vulnerable to accelerated
wind erosion,
And other desertification
processes.
• Symbiotic relationship between natural environment and arid agriculture
• Research methodologies for development of wastelands that constitute ~30% of
the arid zone, wilh viable technologies, to be implemented in village situations to
demonstrate their potentials for employment and resource generation.
• Pressurized irrigation for efficient use of water and other inputs to conserve
water will receive a high priority.
• Conservation agriculture will be a crucial tool in countering the negative impacts
of climate change.
• Plant biodiversity of the arid region has to be maintained and harnessed
scientifically for improving the livelihood of the rural people.
• Watershed management, with appropriate mix of different components of the
agri-horti-silvo-pastoral system, crop diversification and better utilization of
rainwater.
• Replacement of conventional low-yielding crop varieties with improved high-
yielding ones, and by optimizing agro-techniques commensurate with the changing
crop calendar.
• Systematic harnessing of solar and wind energy for their for agricultural and
domestic uses.
symbiotic relationship between natural environment and arid agriculture
Possible Approach for
ML-LUP
• Village level /
cadastral level
Resource information
• Technological help
and intervention at
village level
• Aggregation of
information at ACZ
units for planning
• DSS for sustainable
agriculture
Botto
m to
top a
ppro
ach
Strategy for Micro-level Land Use Planning for combating desertification