Top Banner
The Tale of How Arlington Embraced Transit and Prospered A Presentation by Peter L. Bass Development Advisory Services [email protected] © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015 Density by Desire! DESIRE !
72
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

The Tale of How Arlington Embraced

Transit and Prospered

A Presentation by

Peter L. Bass Development Advisory Services

[email protected]

© Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

Density by Desire!DESIRE !

Page 2: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

2

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ARLINGTON TIED ITS DESTINY TO TRANSIT (METRO)

•  BACKGROUND AND WHAT’S HAPPENED

•  THE RATIONALE

•  THE TOOLS USED

•  SUCCESSES TO DATE

•  NEW CHALLENGES AND REFINEMENTS •  POSSIBLE LESSONS FOR OTHERS

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

Page 3: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

3

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BACKGROUND

WHAT IS ARLINGTON?

THE MISSING CORNER OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA!

26 square mile Virginia part of the old “diamond”

“Retrocession” in 1846

Sleepy suburb until coming of Metro in the 1970’s

Page 4: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

4

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ROSSLYN – BALLSTON CORRIDOR

ONE OF FOUR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS IN COUNTY: TYPICAL OF DC AREA

Towards DC Center

1960’S Aerial

Page 5: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

5

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ROSSLYN – BALLSTON CORRIDOR

Developments by 2000

Page 6: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

6

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

2002

2014

Page 7: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

7

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

APRIL 2014

Page 8: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

8

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

MID 2014

Page 9: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

9

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ROSSLYN THEN

Page 10: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

10

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ROSSLYN NOW

Page 11: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

11

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

COURT HOUSE THEN

Page 12: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

12

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

COURT HOUSE NOW

Page 13: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

13

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON THEN

Page 14: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

14

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON NOW

Page 15: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

15

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON - MID 2014

Page 16: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

16

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON 2014

Page 17: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

17

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON NOW

Clarendon Market Common

Page 18: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

18

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BALLSTON THEN

Clarendon Market Common

Page 19: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

19

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BALLSTON NOW

Clarendon Market Common

Page 20: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

20

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

Clarendon Market Common

SO WHAT HAPPENED?

Page 21: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

21

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 1 •  GOT IN EARLY AT BEGINNING

OF THE PLANNING FOR THE SYSTEM

•  DEBATED THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT VS THE BENEFITS OF GROWTH AND DECIDED IT WANTED TO ENCOURAGE GROWTH

•  EMBARKED ON AN AMBITIOUS COMMUNITY PLANNING EFFORT

Page 22: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

22

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 2 •  ARLINGTON LOBBIED STRONGLY FOR ROUTES AND MORE

STATIONS:

–  Preferred underground down old commercial corridors

–  Put up $300 million local money for preferred routes and more stations

Page 23: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

23

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 3

Page 24: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

24

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

2002 – THIRTY YEARS LATER!

2014

Page 25: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

25

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 4

•  SEVEN STATION AREAS SLATED FOR SUBSTANTIAL DENSITY & GROWTH

•  FOCUS DENSE REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF METRO STATION ENTRANCES TO ENCOURAGE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP

Page 26: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

26

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS REGULATING PLANS:

•  ADOPTED CORRIDOR-WIDE GENERAL LAND USE PLANS BASED ON AGREED-TO DEVELOPMENT GOALS

–  Overall “framework’’ is high density, mixed use development within 1/4 mile of closely spaced underground metro stations

–  4.0 to 10.0 F.A.R. – “bull’s eye” approach

Page 27: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

27

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

Page 28: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

28

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

COUNTY LAND USE PLAN

Page 29: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

29

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS

GENERAL LAND USE PLAN INDICATES THE COUNTY’S WILLINGNESS TO REZONE FOR HIGHER DENSITY IN THE 2 CORRIDORS:

–  BUT LAND REMAINS ZONED LOW DENSITY UNTIL –  SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ARE SUBMITTED

–  CONSISTENT WITH SECTOR PLANS FOR THE SPECIFIC STATION AREA

Page 30: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

30

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

WHEN THE PLANNING FOR METRO STARTED

9/10 OF COUNTY REMAINED PLANNED FOR SFD RESIDENTIAL

AND OTHER LOW DENSITY

1/10 OF COUNTY (2 RAIL CORRIDORS) WERE RE-PLANNED TO ENCOURAGE MIXED-USE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT)

Page 31: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

31

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ON THE GROUND

Photo - Density Curve

Page 32: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

32

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

SECTOR PLANS

DISTINCTIVE “URBAN VILLAGES”

Page 33: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

33

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page 34: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

34

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page from a Clarendon project web marketing site

Page 35: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

35

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page 36: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

36

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON 2014

Page 37: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

37

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page 38: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

38

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page 39: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

39

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE – 2004 PLAN

Page 40: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

40

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE - 2014

Page 41: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

41

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page 42: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

42

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS

PROPERTY IS ONLY REZONED FOR THE HIGHER DENSITY USE SHOWN VIA A SPECIAL EXCEPTION HEARING PROCESS

(“SITE PLAN REVIEW”)

OCCURS ONLY IN CONTEXT OF SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL –  Must remain within guidelines set in the Plans

–  Must provide for various public benefits /features –  Can sometimes proffer extra benefits for added density.

–  Must survive very rigorous and extensive process of reviews

Page 43: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

43

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS

Density incentives to induce desired redevelopment patterns

De minimus public investment beyond original

metro commitment

•  Developers & landowners directly absorb costs of all “public amenities” via density incentives

Page 44: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

44

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS

EXAMPLES OF REQUIREMENTS: –  Wellburn Square park and retail

frontages, art

Page 45: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

45

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PRINCIPAL TOOLS

EXAMPLES OF REQUIREMENTS: Clarendon Commons street, public parking, plaza , mixed use:

Page 46: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

46

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

SOME OF THE RESULTS

R-B CORRIDOR 1970 R-B CORRIDOR TODAY

22,000 jobs

5.5 million sf office

7,000 housing units

Over 100,000 jobs

25+ million sf office

30,000 housing units

Page 47: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

47

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

SOME OF THE RESULTS

R-B CORRIDOR 2000

Page 48: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

48

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

MID 2014

Page 49: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

49

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ROSSLYN TODAY

Page 50: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

50

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

COURTHOUSE TODAY

Page 51: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

51

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON TODAY

Page 52: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

52

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

CLARENDON TODAY

Page 53: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

53

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BALLSTON TODAY

Page 54: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

54

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BALLSTON TODAY

Page 55: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

55

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

BALLSTON TODAY

Page 56: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

56

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

TOUR OF BALLSTON

Page 57: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

57

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

TOUR OF BALLSTON

Page 58: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

58

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ECONOMIC/FISCAL

RETURN ON THE 1970’S METRO INVESTMENT $300 MILLION ADDED CAPITAL COST IN EARLY 1970’S

Equals $20 million/yr. long term carry

ADDED DEVELOPMENT TO DATE: OVER $10 BILLION IN AV Generates approximately $ 200 million/yr. in all sorts of added taxes/

revenues. 10 times the annual debt servicing costs – now paid off

APPROXIMATELY $1 BILLION IN PRIVATELY FUNDED “PUBLIC” BENEFITS

Obtained at Site Plan Approval stage (50 million sf. @ average of $20/sf)

Page 59: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

59

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS

TREMENDOUS GAINS IN METRO RIDERSHIP BOTH DIRECTIONS AT STATIONS

PERCENTAGE OF CORRIDOR RESIDENTS USING METRO OR

WALKING TO WORK EXCEEDS 50% CAR OWNERSHIP RATES AVERAGE ABOUT 1.13 PER HHLD IN

THE CORRIDORS AND ARE DECLINING vs 1.75 for INNER SUBURBS

Page 60: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

60

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS

TRAFFIC LOADS ON MAJOR SURFACE ARTERIALS HAVE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN THE PAST TWO DECADES

Almost all increase is on metro , bus lines and walking.

ZIPCAR & CAPITAL BIKESHARE HAVE LOCAL OPERATIONS

A wide range of TDM plans are being implemented and feasible

METRO STATION ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS COMMAND HIGHER RENTS FOR EQUIVALENT BUILDING SPACE

10-15% premiums on residential rents for comparable buildings 20-25% rent premiums for office, with much higher sustained occupancy rates.

Page 61: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

61

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

REFINEMENTS

Page 62: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

62

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

REFINEMENTS

RETAIL ATTRACTION AND MARKETING PLANS:

Page 63: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

63

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

REFINEMENTS

ART AND BIDS (BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT

DISTRICTS)

Page 64: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

64

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

REFINEMENTS

USPO PROJECT: P3 Six different uses Historic Preservation and new Shared parking

Page 65: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

65

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

LESSONS FOR OTHERS

REACH FOR THE HIGHER GROUND

I think I can… I think I can… I think I can

TAKE YOUR TIME ON THE BIG “FRAMEWORK” DECISIONS

Page 66: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

66

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

LESSONS FOR OTHERS IMPORTANCE OF CITIZEN PROCESS AND GENERAL BUY-IN

THINK BIG AND INVOLVE ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN DIALOGUE

Page 67: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

67

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

LESSONS FOR OTHERS

HAVE HIGH EXPECTATIONS PLAN WELL BE PATIENT MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF PLAN: ONGOING CHAMPIONS &

CULTURE BE CONSISTENT

Page 68: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

68

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

LESSONS FOR OTHERS

DENSITY CAN MOTIVATE THE PRIVATE SECTOR:

No eminent domain for redevelopment Density increases are a carrot Developers know what to expect A strong market definitely helps, …but you have to help create it by vision!

Page 69: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

69

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

Page 70: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

70

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

www.reviewjournal.com/.../ photos/traffic.jpg

Page 71: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

71

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

FOR MORE INFORMATION

CONTACT INFO

Peter L. Bass Development Advisory Services [email protected] 703-967-3175

Page 72: Density by Desire!  Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

72

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

PETER L. BASS – BRIEF BIO

Peter’s passion is urban innovation, taking on challenging projects to better our transportation systems and living environments. His experience includes work on public-private partnerships (P3s) , planning and implementation of community and transit oriented development (TOD), and large scale mixed use real estate projects. His recent work includes using locally based public-private partnerships to finance and implement streetcar systems, as well as transit oriented development. Until he recently opened his own advisory practice, Peter had been HDR’s Director, Urban Development Advisory Services, working on over ten streetcar projects nationwide, several multimodal transportation terminals and numerous TOD projects. In the early 2000’s, he had been Sr. Urban Development Specialist at Arlington County, Virginia's economic development department. In his role there, he devised new strategies and incentives for public-private efforts to further the evolution of the County's national award winning transit-oriented corridor developments. This will be the subject of his remarks today. Peter formerly worked for 30 years as advisor, manager, and principal on private and public sector urban developments in over 60 cities, 10 countries and for the World Bank, USAID and the Inter-American Development Bank.