Top Banner
Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University of Technology Assessing pedestrian flow conditions in Schiphol Plaza: Can Schiphol Plaza cope with future traveller demands? Winnie Daamen, Serge Hoogendoorn, Mario Campanella Delft University of Technology [email protected]
25

Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Jaime Benet
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen

University of Groningen – Eindhoven University of Technology

Assessing pedestrian flow conditions in Schiphol Plaza:Can Schiphol Plaza cope with future traveller demands?

Winnie Daamen, Serge Hoogendoorn, Mario Campanella

Delft University of [email protected]

Page 2: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Schiphol Plaza:A pedestrian simulation study

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 3: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Schiphol Plaza:A pedestrian simulation study

• Different parties involved in Schiphol Plaza:– Schiphol Group (capacity department)– NS train services– TUDelft

• Medium term vision:– 2007 and 2017

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 4: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Schiphol Plaza:A pedestrian simulation study

Insight into pedestrian flows:– Comfort– Bottlenecks– Effect of growth

• (2007) 48 millions pax/year• (2017) 65 millions pax/year

– Effect of different layouts• (2007) current situation • (2017) more shops/catering + turnstiles

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 5: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Infrastructure layout

Forecourt

Arrival halls

Shops / catering

Trains

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 6: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

AH3AH4

AH2

AH1

JD7

JD6JD5

JD4JD3

JD2

JD1

SP12ISP34I

SP56I

SP12IISP12III

SP12IV

SP56IISP56III

SP56IV

VH4 VH3

VH2

VH12

VH1

Page 7: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Page 8: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Shops

Page 9: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Catering

Page 10: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Seats

Page 11: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Waiting arrival halls

Page 12: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

NS activities

Page 13: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nlFlight information

Page 14: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nlFlight information

NS activities

Waiting arrival halls

Seats

Catering

Shops

Page 15: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Schiphol Plaza:results for two scenarios

• Animations• Density plots• Statistics

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 16: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Animation train area 2007

Page 17: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Animation train area 65MAnimation train area 2017

Page 18: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Location of crowded areas

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Ticket Machines

Page 19: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Location of crowded areas

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Ticket Office

Page 20: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Location of crowded areas

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

JD4

Page 21: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Location of crowded areas

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

main corridor

Page 22: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Densities from 06:00 to 22:00

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 23: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

2017 - Pedestrians during the day

Tijd

Page 24: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Flow characteristics aggregate

0 500 1000 15000

2

4

6

Total time spent (s)

Nr

of p

edes

tria

ns

JD4_VH3_Pv_FInfo3_WI3

100 200 300 400 5000

2

4

6

Total walking time (s)

Nr

of p

edes

tria

ns

JD4_VH3_Pv_FInfo3_WI3

0 500 1000 15000

1

2

3

4

Total service time (s)

Nr

of p

edes

tria

ns

JD4_VH3_Pv_FInfo3_WI3

100 200 300 4000

1

2

3

4

Total walking distance (m)

Nr

of p

edes

tria

ns

JD4_VH3_Pv_FInfo3_WI3

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion

Page 25: Delft University of Technology – Erasmus University Rotterdam University of Twente – Radboud University Nijmegen University of Groningen – Eindhoven University.

TRAILCongress

2008

www.rstrail.nl

Conclusions

•Application Nomad successful on various occasions

•Offers insight into pedestrian flows–Already in (early) design phase–Assess or compare designs–New infrastructure types

•Quantifying functioning–Walking times, walking distances–Comfort, safety

Introduction

Description

Results

Conclusion