SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10 IS INDOOR EXPOSURE TO DEHP A HEALTH RISK? D.A. Sarigiannis S.P. Karakitsios A. Gotti 1 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece; 2 Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CE.R.T.H.), Thessaloniki, 57001,Greece
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
IS INDOOR EXPOSURE TO DEHP A HEALTH RISK?
D.A. SarigiannisS.P. KarakitsiosA. Gotti
1Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece; 2Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CE.R.T.H.), Thessaloniki, 57001,Greece
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
DEHP is used as plasticizer in PVC plastics, including personal care products, packaging materials, toys, building materials,….
As DEHP is not chemically bound to PVC it can leach, migrate or evaporate into indoor air, dust, foodstuff, other materials,… Consequently, DEHP is ubiquitous in our environment
Rationale
systemic health effects local health effects (inhalation)
Threshold value systemic ref Health effect –
local effects ? Threshold value local
effect ref
DEHP
Reproductive effects 50 µg/kg bw/day
(20 µg/kg bw/day)*(25 µg/kg bw/day)**
(CSTEE, 1998;ECB, 2008;EFSA,
2005a)
inhalation; increased asthma risk in children
? (Bornehag et al., 2004))Developmental
effects
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
Source conditions: e.g.oEmission strengthoTime patternoChemical/physical properties of pollutant
Housing conditions: e.g.oDimensions and layoutoVentilation characteristicsoSources location
Individual conditions: e.g.oTime activity patterns in houseoSource use pattern
Methodological concept of the approach
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
Concentrations
__ _ _ _ _
__ _
_ __ _
_
chem gaschem gas ind out chem gas chem gas out
chem PMchem gas p chem gas
p PM
chem dust dustd chem gas chem PM
dust
dCV E Q C C V
dt
Ck C V r C V
K C
C mr C C V
K
_ __
__ _
chem PM chem PMp chem gas
p PM
chem PMind out PM PM out
PM
dC CV r C V
dt K C
CQ C C V
C
_ _ __ _
_
chem dust chem dust dustd chem gas chem PM
dust
dC C mV r C C V
dt K
Gas phase mass equilibrium
Particles phase mass equilibrium
Dust phase mass equilibrium
Echem_gas : chemical emission rate
Qint_out : Indoor/outdoor air exchange rate
K : chemical decay coefficient
KP : gas/particles partition coefficient
Kdust : gas/dust partitioning coefficient
rP, rd : partitioning kinetics
V : location volume
CPM : PM concentration indoors
CPM_out : PM concentration outdoors
CDEHP_gas : chemical concentration in gas phase
CDEHP_PM : chemical concentration in PM phase
CDEHP_dusts : chemical concentration in dust phase
m_dust : mass of dust in the location
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
1 1 2 2A A A Askin
skin V skin skin b
dCV k C k C k C k C
dt
1 1 2 2A A A Askin
skin V skin skin b
dCV k C k C k C k C
dt
/P in C BLV
C P b
Q C Q CC
Q Q P
1ex DS in DS alvC F C F C
_ _ _ _ exp ( ) dust soil hand to mouth object to mouthOral osure non dietary M M M M
Uptake from exposure routesD
erm
alIn
hala
tion
Ora
l
T n nn
C f C
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2Ambient air
Home
Workplace
Exposure
Benzene metabolites
Time
Ben
zen
e co
nce
ntr
ati
on
(μ
g/m
3)
Ben
zen
e m
eta
bo
lites
co
nce
ntr
ati
on
(μ
g/l)
stomlumenstom stomach stomlumen lumen
dQ t= RateIng F + Ka C t
dt
The potential dose represents the dose that is in contact with the biologicalbarriers of the human body (e.g., digestive tract, lungs and skin), while the absorbed dose is the quantity of the compound that effectively passes across them and reaches the systemic blood circulation and internal organs.
home home home work work work other other other E f C i f C i f C i
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
DEHP is emitted from electronic equipment and vinyl flooring. Lets assume a typical scenario of a common residential dwelling (size of 270 m2 and air exchange rate equal to 0.5) characterized by total DEHP gaseous emissions of 200 μg/h (vinyl flooring and other plastic equipment)
The vinyl floor case
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
Inhalation Oral Skin0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4Adults
Kids
Route
Upt
ake
(μg/
kg_b
w/d
)DEHP daily uptake per route
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
Conclusions
• Linking Emissions, Concentrations, Exposure and Internal dose within a “continuous” mathematical frame allows us to couple environmental and biological processes efficiently
• Capturing jointly toxicokinetics, toxicodynamics and exposure dynamics allowed us to incorporate mechanistic knowledge in exposure assessment and thus improve the validity and relevance of the risk characterization outcome
• It also allowed the identification of exposure scenarios that could pose health risk
• Integrated external and internal exposure assessment for DEHP highlights the fact that the current health risk from human exposure to DEHP indoors is very low.
• Sum of urinary DEHP metabolites one order of magnitude lower than the BE (660 ug/g creatinine)
• Daily uptake is higher for children than for adults. • Oral and skin uptake are important routes for children, but negligible for adults.
SOT’s 52nd Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas March 10th –14th 2013
Thank you for your kind attention
www.enve-lab.eu
A new perspective to environment-related processes