Defining Value and Measuring HR Mark O’ Donnell, Director and Practice Leader, Human Capital Advisory Services, Consulting
Nov 07, 2014
Defining Value and Measuring HR
Mark O’ Donnell, Director and Practice Leader, Human Capital Advisory Services, Consulting
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Agenda
2
Defining the Value of HR
Introduction 2
HR Strategy 6
Understanding the business 8
Define your HR Strategy 14
Measuring Impact of HR 18
Assess HR Function 25
Reassess HR Service Delivery 34
Conclusion 42
Questions
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Context
3
If you can’t quantify the value that HR has on the Business, how do you prove your worth?
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Marketplace Trends
4
Competition for funds and resources is today’s reality Major change and turbulent market conditions make it hard for Boards to determine
what the strategy should be Top management want to know the Return On Investment for all they spend
including leadership development and talent initiatives These more complex economic conditions offer an opportunity not only to rethink
business strategies but also HR strategy, if HR is core to the business strategy More and more of our clients are telling us that there is particular focus on HR
departments to ensure that All HR investments deliver quantifiable measurable value.- How can HR demonstrate a quantifiable return on investment for Human Capital
initiatives?- Which HR initiatives can be directly targeted at building organisation capability
that has a bottom-line impact – either increasing the organisation’s revenue or reducing costs?
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
People are Critical to Business Performance
More than 85% of senior business executives and HR leaders agree that people are “vital” to every aspect of their organisation’s performance
HR leaders and senior business executives agree the most critical people issues are:
• Leadership development and pipeline
• Talent management
• Creating a high-performance culture
• Training and development
Source: Aligned at the Top, a global survey on people and business challenges conducted by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and the Economist Intelligence Unit
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
There is a gap between HR capabilities and business needs Senior business executives want HR to be more
effective
•Only 4% describe HR as highly effective in addressing the needs of the business
•60% describe HR as only moderately effective
“People” and “HR” are often treated as separate conversations
•People issues are considered “strategic”, e.g. leadership development and pipeline, talent management, creating a high-performance culture, training and development
•HR issues are perceived as “administrative”, e.g. compensation and benefits, performance evaluations, HR operating efficiency
HR is often out of the loop on strategic issues
•Percentage of companies that “rarely” or “never” consult their senior HR team on key business issues:
‒ Mergers and acquisitions (63%)
‒ Compliance and regulation (26%)
‒ Talent (25%)
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Strategy
7
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
A HR strategy should help an organisation create unique competitive advantage by outlining how the HR function and the services it offers will create business value and address the company’s most pressing strategic challenges.
The strategy should identify priorities for investment in HR products and services and in HR service delivery (people, process, technology, operations, etc.) to help address the organisation’s most pressing strategic challenges.
The strategy should include a roadmap for how the HR function will execute on the strategy.
The strategy should also outline the foundational HR capabilities required to effectively execute the strategy.
Typically, the HR strategy will be a two to three year strategy, but it should be refreshed every year.
Before forming your strategy you need to understand the Business
HR Strategy – Deloitte view
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Understanding Business Strategy
9
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Questions to Ask
What does the Business do to drive performance? Who are our shareholders and what do they want? What does our Business do?
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
What do the sections of the EVM HC represent?
1. Value DriversHow value is created
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Value Drivers - How Value is Created
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
EVM HC: Changing the Mindset of How HR OperatesHR has traditionally been viewed as an overhead cost that is highly transaction-based. Behind every great product, service, and innovation are people.
Sustained Growth• Merger Integration• New Market Entry• Sales force
Transformation• Rewards
Transformation
Global Labor Shortage• Workforce Planning• New Market Entry• Global Mobility• Learning and
Development• Outsourcing and
Offshoring
Risk & Compliance• Global Workforce
Security• Regulatory
Compliance• Risk Management
Future Capabilities• Change
Management• Global Program
Management• Leadership
Development
OperatingMargin
AssetEfficiency
ExpectationsRevenueGrowth
Volume
Direct
Costs
(COGS)
Indirect
Costs
(SG&A)
Income
Taxes
S H A R E H O L D E R V A L U E
Property, Plant & Equip.
InventoryReceivables &
PayablesCompany Strengths
External Factors
Price
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Human Capital Dimensions - Categories of Improvement Focus
The Human Capital Dimensions embedded within the map show the seven major Human Capital categories of improvement within an organisation.
Human Capital Dimensions
Talent Strategies:Talent-focused activities to execute short and long term business objectives
Learning and Development:Activities in support of employee and executive development
Change Management and Transformation:Activities focused on the people implications of major business events
Organizational Strategies:Activities in support of business initiatives that focus on developing organization and team structures
Employee Rewards and Benefits:Activities that link employees’ work experience to their commitment and contribution to business value
Governance, Risk, and Compliance:Activities to proactively manage the people-related aspects of risk, regulations, security, compliance, and ethics
HR Strategy and Services: Activities focused on HR strategy and service delivery
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Define HR Strategy
15
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Step 1: Understand Strategic Priorities & Business Context
Example: +10% Annual Growth Target Improve Product Development Pipeline
and Deployment Increase Share of Revenue Capture from
Advertising Improve Product and Service Mix
Acquire New CustomersRetain and Grow Current
Customers
Leverage Income-Strengthen Pricing
Marketing &
Sales
Account
Management
Cross-Sell/
Up-SellRetention
Demand &
Supply
Management
Price
Optimization
Product &
Service
Innovation
Cash/Asset
Management
VolumePrice
Realization
Revenue Growth
Generating Assets
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Example – Strategic priorities and HR strategic actions:
Exponential Headcount Increase:Focus on recruiting and selection, retention practices, talent placement, and employee development.
HR Organization Transformation:Optimize the HR function.
Enterprise Cost Reduction:Maximize investments and spend on human capital to focus on business issues, operational efficiencies, and process excellence.
Focus on Customer Service:Build a culture of high performance and innovation with a focus on the customer.
Post Merger Integration:Support rationalization of core process, technology, people, and policy with a defined project portfolio.
Step 2: Identify Issues & Challenges
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Deloitte’s HR strategy framework
Deloitte HR Strategy Framework
Define Value1. Understand business strategy2. Define HR strategy
3. Identify HR’s meaning
Deliver Value7. Establish a delivery model for HR services8. Upgrade the company’s HR capabilities9. Continuously improve HR operations10. Communicate the value of HR services
Align HR Services4. Segment stakeholders5. Prioriti`se HR investments6. Design HR services
HRStrategy
DeliverValue
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Measuring Impact of HR
19
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu20
HR Balanced Scorecard?
The Balanced Scorecard is a means of connecting key decisions and control, that measures the value created by initiatives to the core business areas, compares program benefits to costs including: Customer Experience: How do customers see us? Business Impact &
Satisfaction Measurements Talent Strategies: What must we excel at? Learning and application measures –
knowledge, skills and attitudes and on-the-job behaviours Process and Innovation: Can we continue to improve and create value? Financial Focus: How do we look to shareholders?
The HR Balanced Scorecard aligned to business strategies measures improvement in customer value
Defining the Value of HR
“The Balanced Scorecard fills the void that exists in most management systems – the lack of a systematic process to implement and obtain
feedback about strategy” (Kaplan & Norton, 1996).
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu21
Best Practice Design: Characteristics of a Successful Scorecard
Defining the Value of HR
Involves the scorecard owner in the design
Characteristics
Makes efficient use of managers’ time
Understandable & transferable
Easily aligned across the organisation
Only this person knows the answers
Management time is scarce
Must be communicated across the organisation
Reason
Help the whole company work towards a common goal
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu22
Value of a Balanced Scorecard
HR
Transformation
HR Value
Defining the Value of HR
HR
Transformation
HR Value
Bal
ance
d S
core
card
The Balanced Scorecard examines the evidence of key HR Initiatives linking them to business performance measures that drive Business Strategy
The value of using a Balanced Scorecard, HR can fuel more sustainable employee initiatives with longer-lasting results
The Balanced Scorecard works as an ‘umbrella’ concept that links together
organisational objectives, ways of thinking and management tools.
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Overall HR Scorecard – Client Example
Financial • Average termination cost • Cost of turnover• Cost of acquisition per hire ♦ HR Training spend (per Manager / Director / Executive)HR FTE RatioSLA compliance Vendor Management FTE Ratio+
HR Operating Expense/FTE
Customer Experience• Hiring Manager satisfaction with quality of new hires• Employee satisfaction with Career Zone♦ Employee satisfaction with career progression Business unit satisfaction with organisation design support Employee engagement index Frequency of communication Response rates on effectiveness surveysEmployee HRO satisfaction Self-service availability rate Portal usage penetration rates
Process / Innovation• Line manager use of recruitment centers• Share of employees with basics in place “day one”• Time to efficiency for new hires♦ Time to identify & approve leadership training request ♦ Course enrollment and completion rates ♦ Share of positions with successor identified ♦ Number of job families for which there are established
career paths Share of business using consistent change leadership
framework Number of issues at level 1, level 2 or level 3 support
Talent• Number of critical positions and critical workforce segments identified
• Retention of new hires• Retention rates by critical workforce segments• Leadership stability rates♦Number of internal leadership appointments♦Share of leaders reviewed in talent review process♦Timeliness of talent reviewsNumber of employee referrals Diversity of leadership teamOutsourcer turnover rate
Potential Metrics
Legend (Link to Critical HR Capabilities)• Talent Management♦ Leadership Development Organisational Development HR Administration
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Metrics for critical HR capabilities and services can be identified…
Financial Customer Experience Process & Innovation Talent
Workforce Planning & Segmentation
• Cost of workforce planning process
• Business unit satisfaction with workforce planning process
• Workforce planning process performed annually and linked to budgeting process
• Number critical positions and critical workforce segments identified
• Share of critical jobs held by those with high / low performance levels
Talent Sourcing & Acquisition
• Cost of sourcing & acquisition process
• Cost of acquisition per hire• Business case savings realization
for Career Zone implementation• Referral bonus cost per hire
• Hiring Manager satisfaction with recruiting process
• Hiring Manager satisfaction with quality of new hires
• Employee satisfaction with Career Zone
• Number of positions where talent pool is already identified
• Time to fill positions • Recruitment source ratio• Requisition response rate• Referral conversion rate• Applicant conversion rate• Interview conversion rate• (First) offer acceptance rate • Ratio of contractors to full-time
staff
• Share of new hires receiving top performance rating
• Management accountability for the quality of new hires
• Share of new hires leaving the organizations within 6 months
• Employee tenure by sourcing method
• Poor quality hire rate
On-Boarding & Orientation
• Cost of on-boarding process • Employee / Manager satisfaction with on-boarding process
• Share of employees with basics in place day 1 (phone computer, etc)
• Time to efficiency for new hires
• Management accountability for on-boarding process
• Retention of new hires
Retention
• Cost of recognition practices• Average termination cost • Cost of turnover • Compensation impact of
replacement hires
• Employee satisfaction with recognition practices
• Recognition rate of the employment brand by critical workforce segments
• Number of lateral moves within a business unit
• Number transfers between business units
• Time to fill positions with internal transfer
• Share positions filled with internal candidates
• Number of recognition awards granted
• Voluntary turnover rate (by department, level, workforce segment)
• Retention of high performers• Retention of critical segments • Leadership stability rate• Accession rate • Percentage of referral hiring
client x Case – use in Roadmap Section
Potential Talent Management Metrics – Client Example
Example
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Align HR Services
Deloitte HR Strategy Framework
Define Value1. Understand business
strategy2. Define HR strategy3. Identify HR’s primary
performance levers
Deliver Value7. Establish a delivery model for HR services8. Upgrade the company’s HR capabilities9. Continuously improve HR operations10. Communicate the value of HR services
Align HR Services4. Assess HR Function5. Design HR services
HRStrategy
DeliverValue
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Assessing your HR Function
26
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Maturity Assessment
• We have developed an HR Maturity Model to meet this objective.
• The HR Maturity Model captures our views on leading practices for talent management, as well as for each of the key elements of our HR service delivery model: HR strategy, HR customers, HR roles, and HR enables.
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Deloitte Global HR Maturity Tool Dimensions
Talent Maturity HR Strategy & Service Delivery Maturity
• Talent Strategy & Plan• Talent Metrics• Talent Geographic Reach &
Diversity• Attraction• Development• Retention• Work Environment• Innovation• Employer Brand & EVP• Talent Governance &
Leadership• Talent Infrastructure• Talent Attitudes & Culture
HR Strategy Alignment• Business Strategy Impact• HR & Talent Strategy Alignment• Business Alignment• Customer Segmentation• HR’s Role in Key Talent Decisions• HR Planning Effectiveness• HR Metrics• HR Capability • HR Enablers (e.g. Policy, Process,
Governance, Reporting & Technology)• HR Credibility
HR Customer Segmentation • Employees • Managers• Executives• Non-Employees• Applicants• Retirees
HR Service Delivery Roles• Business Partner• CoE• SSC• Outsourcer• Vendor Manager
HR Service Delivery Enablers
• Processes• Procedures, & Compliance• Integrated Technologies• HR Portal & Self-Service• Reporting & Analytics• Governance, Service-Level Agreements
(SLAs) & Metrics
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Talent Maturity ModelDEVELOPING BASIC PROGRESSING ADVANCED MARKET LEADING
STRATEGY & PLANWe do not have a talent strategy or our
talent strategy is in development or under revision
Our talent strategy and our organization’s strategy are aligned
Our talent strategy is an essential component of our organization’s strategy, without it our business strategy would be
incomplete
Our talent strategy and our organization’s strategy are seamlessly integrated and
directionally consistent
Our organization’s strategy is informed and influenced by our talent insights and
predictions
METRICSWe have a small number of talent-
focused metrics that provide us with some of the information that we require
We have a set of talent-focused metrics in place, however we are not sure of what
we invest in talent and what our overall return is
We know how much we invest in our talent, although it is not always clear what
return we get for that investment
We know how much we invest in our talent and we know what return we get for
that investment
We make informed business decisions about where to place our talent
investments, and are able to predict the returns that we will get
GEOGRAPHIC REACH & DIVERSITY
We have a local focus on talent and limited diversity
We have a regional / national talent focus and are making some progress on our
diversity agenda
Our approach to talent has an international dimension to it and we have made significant progress on our diversity
agenda
The global diverse talent market is of value to us today
We take full advantage of the global diverse talent market today, and we are
well positioned to continue to do so in the future
ATTRACTIONWe consistently face challenges in
attracting the talent we need to achieve our organization’s goals
We sometimes find it difficult to attract the talent that we need to achieve our
organization’s goals
We are able to attract some of the talent that we need, some of the time to achieve
our organization’s goals
We are able to attract most of the talent that we need, most of the time to achieve
our organization’s goals
We are always able to attract the talent that we need, when we need it, and in the
quantities required to achieve all our organization’s goals
DEVELOPMENTWe are evaluating which talent and
leadership development programs to invest in
Our talent and leadership development programs exist in pockets and are often
tactical in nature
We have a number of significant talent and leadership development programs
that are coordinated across our organization
Our talent and leadership development programs are highly inter-connected and
have beneficial effects on our talent
Our talent and leadership development programs deliver all the benefits that both
our organization and talent demands
RETENTION We typically struggle to retain our talentWe can retain some of our talent some of
the time We can retain selected talentWe can retain most of our talent most of
the timeWe are able to retain our talent all of the time and proactively manage turnover
WORK ENVIRONMENT
There are ways that we could improve our working environment to support our
mandate and meet the needs of our talent
We have structured and organized our working environment to support our mandate and meet the needs of our
talent
Our working environment is flexible and adjusts to meet the evolving needs and desires of our talent while continuing to
support our mandate
The way that we are structured and organized enables us to maximize the
contributions that our talent makes to our mutual success
We put our talent at the heart of our organization, our talent itself drives how
we are structured and organized
INNOVATIONOur talent initiatives are rudimentary in
nature, but we are considering implementing some innovative ideas
We have implemented a number of innovative talent focused initiatives
We continue to evolve and improve our talent management approach – often we build on what has worked well in other
organizations
We regularly compare our approach to managing talent with other organizations
and we typically remain ahead of our competitors
We are originators of industry leading talent management thinking and best
practices – our competitors typically copy what we do
EMPLOYER BRAND & EMPLOYEE VALUE
PROPOSITION
We are beginning to develop our employer brand and define our employee
value proposition
We proactively manage our employer brand and have a well defined employee
value proposition
We are an employer of choice and have a clearly articulated and supported
employee value proposition
We are the leading employer of choice for the talent that we need now
We are able to adjust our employer brand and employee value proposition to meet
our evolving organization and talent requirements
GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Our HR function is responsible for all the talent initiatives in our organization
Our HR function typically leads our talent management initiatives, with input from
senior executives
Our talent initiatives are sponsored by senior executives, and are implemented within a common governance structure
Talent is a significant and regular item at our executive and board meetings, we use agreed protocols to facilitate our
decision making
Our executives eagerly devote substantial amounts of their time to talent, in addition their rewards are also directly
linked to talent KPIs
TALENT INFRASTUCTURE
We have limited talent systems, processes and service delivery capability, though we are beginning to identify some
initiatives to rectify this
We have a handful of tactical talent systems, our processes are being developed and our service delivery
capability is evolving
We have most of the talent systems, processes, information and service
delivery capability that we need
We have a full suite of efficient, effective and integrated talent systems, processes,
information and service delivery capability
Our talent systems, processes, information and service delivery
capability are flexible and have industrial scale capacity
ATTITUDES & CULTURE
Some of us believe that the management of talent is important to the success of our
organization
As an organization we believe that the management of talent is important to the
success of our organization
Talent management is embedded in our ways of working
Successful people in our organization generally have a talent mindset
Talent management is in our organizational DNA
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Strategy Alignment Maturity ModelDEVELOPING BASIC PROGRESSING ADVANCED MARKET LEADING
ORGANIZATION STRATEGY IMPACT
Our HR leadership is not involved in organization strategy formulation or
execution planning
Our HR leadership is asked to help create plans to execute on our
organization’s strategy
Our HR leadership has some involvement in organization strategy
formulation and is an active participant in execution
Our HR leadership is actively involved in organization strategy formulation and
execution
Our HR team leadership has an equal voice at the table in overall organization
strategy formulation and execution
HR & TALENT STRATEGY ALIGNMENT
We have an HR strategy but no articulated talent strategy
We have an HR strategy but it is not clearly aligned to our Talent and
Organization strategies
We have both a Talent strategy which outlines the organization’s talent needs and an HR strategy that details how HR
will deliver organization requirements
Our HR strategy articulates how we will deliver on the organization’s talent
strategy
Our HR strategy and our talent strategy are seamlessly integrated and
directionally consistent in supporting the organization’s strategy
BUSINESS ALIGNMENT
We do not have a clear understanding of the overall organizational value chain and
how people add value
We have a general understanding of the overall organizational value chain but
cannot clearly articulate how people add value
We are beginning to be able to articulate how people add value in the overall
organizational value chain, and use this to shape our overall HR & Talent strategies
We use our deep understanding of the overall organizational value chain and how people add value to guide our HR & Talent
strategies
We use our deep understanding of the overall organizational value chain and how
people add value to identify and createtargeted HR & Talent strategies for critical
workforce segments
CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION
Our HR activities do not target different customer segments and we do not measure customer service levels
Our HR activities do not target different customer segments, but we do measure
customer service levels
Our HR strategy does identify different target customer needs; we measure
customer service levels for most HR roles and services in our organization
Our HR strategy and service delivery reflect a higher investment in the most
critical customer groups and we measure customer service more rigorously among
these customers
Our most critical customer groups receive higher investment; we ensure our top HR talent is focused on delivering service to
them
HR’S ROLE IN KEY TALENT DECISIONS
Our HR team learns about key talent decisions and actions after the action is
taken
Our HR team is asked to execute on talent decisions after a decision is made
by the organization
Our HR team provides the business guidance on some talent decisions (e.g.,
terminations, recruiting)
Our HR team is a sought after advisor for all key talent decisions
Our HR team proactively identifies talent issues and facilitates business decision
making
HR PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS
We react to issues as they arise, with no formal process or tools for assessing HR
priorities
We create an HR budget at the start of the year based on a high level view of
priorities
We have a rigorous process for assessing HR priorities and impact on the
organization and our budget is built on outcomes of the process
Organization and other functional leaders provide input in our process for assessing
HR priorities and provide additional budget
Our process of assessing HR priorities includes predictive analytics and
measures of ROI to inform our decisions
HR METRICS We have very limited HR metricsWe have some HR metrics, primarily
focused on outputs vs. leading indicators (e.g., retention, offer acceptance)
We have a balanced scorecard for HR that includes financial, customer service, process efficiency and innovation metrics
Our balanced scorecard for HR includes organization metrics in addition to HR
metrics, and predictive analysis of metrics is used in HR planning
Key talent/HR metrics are part of the overall organization scorecard, and
predictive analysis of metrics is used in organization planning
HR CAPABILITYThere are significant gaps in HR
capability required to deliver on our HR activities
We have most of the HR functional capability that we need, but there are still
some HR functional gaps
We have identified critical HR capabilities and have most that we need, but there are still some business capability gaps
(e.g., business acumen, analytical skills)
We have a career development rotation program in place to rotate HR talent between Business Partner, Center of Expertise and Shared Services roles
We have a career development rotation program in place to rotate talent between
HR and business roles
HR ENABLERS (e.g. Policy, Process,
Governance, Reporting & Technology)
We do not take a coordinated approachto enabling our HR service delivery
through policy, process, governance,reporting and supporting technology
We are have the basics in place to enable HR service delivery, but we are
lacking in consistency and more advanced capabilities
We are beginning to adopt a systematic perspective on HR enablement, however do not always adjust the appropriate HR
enablers when changes are made
We have a systematic perspective on HR enablement and look to adjust the
appropriate HR enablers when changes are made
We take a proactive approach to continuously improving service delivery through the adoption of leading practices
in HR enablement
HR CREDIBILITYHR has low credibility in the organization,
and is viewed only as a back office function
HR has some credibility in the organization and is viewed as capable of
providing technical expertise in some areas of HR
HR has high credibility as an expert in functional HR areas
HR has high credibility both in functional HR expertise and ability to contribute to
organization success
HR leaders are considered strong candidates for succession to broader
organization leadership roles
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Customer Segmentation Maturity ModelDEVELOPING BASIC PROGRESSING ADVANCED MARKET LEADING
EXECUTIVESWe rarely interact with customers
at the executive level
We react to infrequent requests for information from Executives,
typically regarding compensation matters
We are beginning to work more frequently with executives on a
broader range of HR/talent matters
Our HR leader is a member of the executive team and we work
proactively with the executives to address business issues
Talent is a regular topic at executive meetings, and HR
proposes key issues and solutions proposed for discussion
MANAGERSWe respond reactively to requests from managers on a limited set of
HR/talent issues
We react to a fairly broad set of talent requests from managers, but
provide few customized services and service delivery options for
managers
We proactively work with managers on a fairly broad set of HR/talent
requests, but still provide few customized services and service
delivery options
We are viewed as partners in addressing most HR/talent issues,
and we provide customized HR services for managers and tailored
service delivery options
We are viewed as partners in addressing most HR/talent issues, and we have built significant talent management capability among our managers to handle most issues
EMPLOYEES
Employees are our primary customers and we provide basic, ‘one size fits all’ HR services and support through face-to-face and
phone interactions with generalists/HR Business Partners
(BPs)
We treat employees and managers as distinct customers, but continue
to deliver ‘one size fits all’ HR services and support through face-to-face and phone interactions with
generalists/HR BPs
We offer ‘one size fits all’ employee service through shared service centers and limited self-service
options; employees can still access information through generalists /
HR BPs
We offer tailored employee services for critical employee segments, with
broad shared services and self-service options; employees must use these channels for inquiries
and transactions
We are pioneers in creating innovative self-service options for
our employees, with sophisticated, branded employee portal
technologies; our employees do most transactions through self-
service
NON-EMPLOYEES (i.e. Contractors)
HR does not manage contractors or other ‘non-employees’ and does not
know what relationships are in place throughout the organization
HR does not manage contractors or other ‘non-employees’, but we do
track relationships with them through manual processes
We have tailored processes and policies in place to manage contractors and other ‘non-
employees’ and HR provides support to the organization in
execution
We have a strategy in place for the effective utilization of contractors or other ‘non-employees’ vs. regular employees and partner with the
organization in execution
We proactively partner with the organization to consider
alternatives to optimize our use of regular and contract or ‘non-
employee’ workforce
APPLICANTSWe do not have processes in place
to effectively manage applicants
We have varied processes in place to track and manage applicants, but
accountability is not clear and the processes are not supported by technology and are cumbersome
Our automated application process and tracking capability allows us to be responsive to all applicants, but
our technology is not linked to HRMS requiring duplicative data
entry upon hire
We treat applicants as an important customer segment, developing relationships and leveraging our
technologies to effectively manage the process
We leverage our sophisticated technologies to target new sources
of applicants, strengthen relationships, and manage our
sourcing, selection and new hire processes effectively and efficiently
RETIREESWe provide ad hoc support to
retirees as required
We provide support to retirees as required through centralized
internal or outsourced vendor support for pension and other
questions and transactions
In addition to providing support for questions and transactions, we
provide access to retirees to organization portals for information
In addition to providing support for questions and transactions, we proactively communicate with retirees regarding organization
updates
We treat retirees as a potential contributor to our ongoing success,
delivering high quality service to meet their needs and providing a
channel for them to provide innovative ideas, candidate
referrals, etc.
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Roles Maturity ModelDEVELOPING BASIC PROGRESSING ADVANCED MARKET LEADING
HR BUSINESS PARTNERS (BP)
Our HR business partners (BPs) are generalists who spend the
majority of their time processing administrative activities and responding to employee or
manager inquiries
Some of our HR BPs are developing relationships with
leaders which allow them to have greater impact; however, most still spend a significant amount of time
on administrative activities
The majority of our HR BPs are developing relationships with
leaders which allow them to have greater impact; however, most still
spend 30-50% of their time on administrative activities
Our HR BPs are senior resources who focus their time on providing
coaching and advice on talent issues and opportunities to leaders
and are rarely involved in day to day administrative activities
Our HR BPs are strategic advisors who provide coaching and advice to leaders on both talent and broader business issues; many of our HR BPs come from line roles in the
organization
CENTERS OF EXPERTISE (CoE)
We have HR technical specialists but they are not organized in
Centers of Expertise (CoE) and may not have the depth or breadth of expertise we need to support the
organization’s needs
We have some CoEs which focus on developing policies and
programs based on HR expertise vs. in depth understanding of the
organization’s needs
Our CoEs develop new programs and policies to support the
organization’s needs based on input from our HR BPs, and our
leaders and employees
We have leading edge capability in some of our CoEs which focus on developing innovative solutions to
our most challenging organizational needs and our CoE talent has strong consulting and change
management skills
We have leading edge capability in all our CoEs and frequently assess
their focus to ensure we are supporting the most pressing
organization needs; our HR talent rotates through CoE, HR BP and
line roles in our organization
SHARED SERVICESWe do not leverage HR shared
services in our organization
We leverage limited shared services capability, primarily with
respect to payroll and benefit administration processing and
limited employee inquiry capability
We leverage shared services to support multiple HR processes,
including transaction processing, employee and manager inquiries,
and some advisory services
Our shared service organization leverages leading edge workflow,
case management and self-service technologies to optimize efficiency
and enhance effectiveness; we have well defined performance
indicators and service level agreements
Our shared services organization delivers with leading efficiency,
effectiveness and cost metrics; we are frequently approached by other
organizations to share leading practices in shared services
OUTSOURCERWe may currently outsource
specific services, but have no overall strategy for outsourcing
We currently outsource specific services, and did complete a
sourcing analysis before making the decision to outsource
We have developed an overall sourcing strategy for HR, assessing
benefits and challenges of outsourcing several HR processes
Our sourcing strategy included an assessment of full outsourcing of our shared services capabilities
We monitor changes in the outsource service provider market and benchmark our internal shared service capability or our outsourced
services to ensure we are leading edge
VENDOR MANAGER
We do not have vendor management capability in HR and
have limited access to vendor management capability in other
functions of our organization
We have limited vendor management capability in HR or
other functions in our organization, but no formal accountability exists
for management of HR vendors
We have clarified accountability for management of HR vendors within
HR or other functions in our organization, with support for
negotiation and management of contracts
We have built sophisticated vendor management capability in HR or
other functions in our organization to ensure we optimize our vendor
relationships and services provided; we have created an overall vendor management strategy and carefully
manage our SLAs
We effectively manage large outsource relationships as an
integral component of our overall HR service delivery model and
governance structure; our organization and our vendors both
benefit from enhancements in service delivery
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
HR Enablers Maturity ModelDEVELOPING BASIC PROGRESSING ADVANCED MARKET LEADING
PROCESSESWe do not have any global
processes; we have little or no documentation of local processes
There is significant local variation in process; process documentation is
held locally and is not easily accessible
There are some global processes, with some local variations; process
documentation is centrally held
We have global processes with minimal local variations; processes are held centrally and are readily accessible, and metrics for each
process are defined
We have a clear process architecture, with Six Sigma
compliant process documentation; global processes with minimal local variations are held on an accessible
knowledge base
POLICIES & COMPLIANCE
We have not documented any of our HR policies and they are very
diverse across sites, units, entities, countries, etc.
We have documented some of our more ‘global’ HR policies and
procedures; however, most of our policies are inconsistent across our
organization
There are some global policies, with some local variations; policy
documentation is centrally held
We have global policies with minimal local variations; policies are
held centrally and are readily accessible; the resulting impact on further process standardization and
automation is limited
Our HR policies and procedures are globally consistent, up-to-date,
and can be easily accessed electronically; corporate HR takes a
proactive role in driving harmonization enabling further
standardization and automation of processes
INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY
We do not use a comprehensive HR technology platform and data is not maintained in a central location
We have an HR technology platform to manage personnel
administration but do not use all functionality or it does not
adequately meet the needs of the organization
We have a strong HR management system (HRMS) with some basic workflow but no Optical Character Recognition (OCR) functionality in
place
Our HRMS supports the main people priorities of the organization and goes beyond administration to include functions like Recruiting or
Performance Management; there is some enhanced workflow and basic
OCR functionality in place
We have a fully functioning, robust HRMS that includes all modules (i.e. Organization and Positions,
Recruitment, Compensation, Benefits, Talent Management,
Payroll and Time, and Learning); workflow and OCR functionalities
are fully leveraged
HR PORTAL & SELF-SERVICE
We do not have an HR portal, self-service functionality or HR
knowledge base
We have an HR knowledge base that is paper-based; we do not have
an HR portal or any self-service functionality
We have a basic HR portal in place with basic self-services and the
functionality for downloading and printing online forms for a wider
range of processes; the HR knowledge base is not linked to
portal
We have an HR portal that is integrated with robust employee
and manager self-service (ESS and MSS) functionality and the HR
knowledge base
We have an enhanced HR portal that includes a wide range of self-service and workflow functionality
using advanced technology such as interactive forms; the knowledge
base is completely integrated
REPORTING & ANALYTICS We do very limited HR reporting
Our reporting is heavily manual with few standard reports defined
Our reporting is transactional based (e.g. annual hires, annual turnover,
etc); there is some automation however data and interpretation
inconsistencies make it difficult to ensure full transparency,
comparability and controllability across the organization
Our reports are extensively automated and provide analytical
insight (e.g. period over period trending, integrating external data
sources into workforce analysis and vice versa) to drive management
decisions
We focus reporting on generating insight rather than numbers, and make standard reports available electronically, secured by portal roles; consistent and centrally
available data is used for predictive and truly differentiating reporting
GOVERNANCE, SLAs & METRICS
We do not have HR governance structures or metrics in place
We have informal HR governance structures and metrics but they are
not clearly articulated
We have some formal HR governance structures and metrics
but their mandates are not clear
Our HR governance structures are well defined and are followed most of the time and metrics are in place to assess overall HR efficiency and
effectiveness
We have a cohesive HR governance structure with clearly defined roles and responsibilities and an HR scorecard is in place
that links to the overall organization metrics
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Deliver Value
Deloitte HR Strategy Framework
Define Value1. Understand business
strategy2. Define HR strategy3. Identify HR’s primary
performance levers
Deliver Value7. Establish a delivery model for HR services8. Upgrade the company’s HR capabilities10. Communicate the value of HR services
Align HR Services4. Segment stakeholders5. Prioritise HR
investmentsHR
Strategy
DeliverValue
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Establish and Re-assess HR Service Delivery Model
35
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Deloitte HR Service Delivery Framework
Ensure HR service delivery model is aligned to deliver effectively on Business & HR Strategies.
Review Customers to determine if unique HR requirements exist for different customer segments.
Assess how effectively service is being delivered through retained and outsourced HR Roles
Evaluate the effectiveness of Enablers that HR can leverage to deliver efficient and effective service.
Traditional ‘Ulrich’ model was used to describe the high level, basic relationships and players in the transformed HR organization, showing how the three building blocks of Shared Services Operations, Business Partners and Centres of Excellence interacted with managers and employees.
HR Service Delivery Framework (mid-90’s)
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesThe Evolution of HR Service Delivery
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
The building blocks that make up the four key roles in the operating model are Group HR, CoEs, SSC and Business Partners
Represents HR at the Exco level. Group HR is the business partner to the Exco. Sets the tone and pace of the HR strategy, in line with the Group business strategy. Owns the maintenance of the strategic framework for the CoEs to develop the HR policy blueprint. Responsible for managing succession planning and HR issues for Exco -2.
Group HR
Centres of Expertise
Designs and develops deep technical capability in areas of HR that drive strategic agenda. Innovates, designs and develops HR strategies, policies and processes in line with latest industry thinking. Provides expert guidance to HRBPs and senior executives in the SBUs/Divisions. Resolves complex issues escalated from the Shared Service Centre and HRBPs.
Shared Services
Provides standardised, consistent, accurate, fit for purpose transactional and functional expertise to HR, delivering high quality, efficient administration for all HR transactions.
Customer-focused contact centres providing the first point of call for employees and managers for advice, guidance and query resolution.
Responsible for continuous improvement of delivery of HR processes and technology utilisation by HR.
Business Partners
Drives the strategic people issues, aligning group and SBU/Divisional HR strategies. Provides SBU/division with local geographical input for Group policy blueprint development. Acts as a business consultant maximising the value talent brings to the SBU. Manages SBU/country-specific HR issues but does not perform local transactions. Provides input to the prioritisation of HR-owned business projects, providing subject matter expertise to HR projects
and acting as the change management agent.
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesThe Four Building Blocks
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesService Provision
Group HR Centre of Expertise Shared Services Business Partners
Group HR• “Owns the skills
development, succession planning and career planning of HR professionals”
Group HR provides the CoE with the framework for developing HR policies that enable the execution of the corporate HR strategy
Provides the cohesiveness for the CoE teams to work together to deliver the strategy in an aligned way
Group HR ensures the HR service delivery model operates effectively, ensuring clarity of roles and responsibilities in the delivery of all HR services
Provides BPs with a framework for the consistent execution of the BP role, within the dynamics of different SBU/Divisional cultures and environments
Owns succession planning working with BPs who manage the talent pipeline
Centre of Expertise• “Internal Consultants to
the business”
The CoE provides expert input into the development of the corporate HR strategy by Group HR
The CoE owns the end-to-end processes for HR delivery, integration between processes and provides guidance to the SSC for continuous improvement in HR process delivery
Resolves complex issues escalated from the SSC
The CoE provides strategic consulting support to the BPs, advising on complex and strategic people-management issues and provide guidance on the use of HR policies and tools to meet the business’s needs
Shared Services“Delivers high quality and efficient HR services to managers and employees, maximising self-service and emulating the brand in the way it delivers customer services”
SSC provides the appropriate HR services support requested by Group HR, for example administration of HR issues
The SSC operationalises strategies and policies developed by the CoE, operating efficient high quality processes and providing front line support to managers and employees
SSC delivers high quality and efficient HR processes to the SBU to agreed SLAs, liaising with Business Partners to ensure customer satisfaction
Manages queries form managers and employees
Business Partners“The face of HR to the business”
BPs provide input to Group HR on the current and future needs of the business from HR, along with direct and indirect feedback on customer satisfaction with HR service delivery
BPs provide guidance to CoEs on the strategic direction and priorities of the business including future needs
BPs act as a conduit between the business and CoEs translating business priorities and needs
BPs act as a conduit between the business and SSC, interpreting customer needs and feedback “from the coal face”, managing the performance expectations of the business and SSC
Resolves complex queries escalated from the SSC
This matrix summarises the relationship each team within the model has with the other HR teams, and some of the key responsibilities.
P R
O V
I D
E S
S
E R
V I
C E
S
T O
…
R E C I P I E N T O F S E R V I C E S F R O M …
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesThe Business Partner Role Assumptions / Attributes
Business Partners Role Business Partners do:
Work with Business Unit to translate business needs into HR requirements and working environment
Identify the organizational capabilities required to execute the business strategy
Acts as a consultant most frequently on issues related to strategy execution and change, talent management, employee engagement, performance management, employee relations
Responsible for implementing initiatives at the business unit level and may support the design of specialized or customized training, communications, and recruiting
“Broker” of services between specialized internal groups (e.g. Total Rewards) and the business
Collaborate with Centers of Expertise to create innovative HR solutions
Provide feedback to Centers of Expertise about HR solution effectiveness
Support culture change taking direction from the business leadership
Develop the leadership and manage the talent pipeline in the Business Unit
Analyze and investigate business / people issues and trends within the bank
Deliver HR services in line with business needs
Focus on consultative support and HR solution delivery to senior line management
Challenge the business in order to ensure aligned and integrated people strategy, and fair people management
Support all HR products and services, including any required changes and ensures client complies
Coach line managers in people management
Ensure effective execution of HR policies and processes in their business
Ensure compliance with local legislation and regulatory requirements
Interact with the Workers’ Council on individual issues
Business Partners Attributes Business Partners don’t:
Client relationship management People strategy development Contracting/stakeholder management Influencing Business acumen Consulting Resource management Policy implementation/ communication Negotiation Conflict resolution Change management Marketing Business planning Program Management Analytical skills (Interpret reporting)
Support line managers and employees in day-to-day administration Execute design and development of HR programs, procedures or policies Manage employee data Report on workforce-related data Resolve individual EE queries; have non-managerial employees as clients Undertake people management responsibilities on behalf of line managers Interact with the Workers’ Council on group issues
Capabilities
Facilitating organization change
Business acumen
Client service delivery
Organizational design
Consulting
Personal and professional impact
Coaching and influencing
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesThe CoEs Role Assumptions / Attributes
CoEs Role CoEs do:
Provide expert solutions and services to the Business Units, across the whole of the enterprise
Customers of the CoEs are typically the BP. May also be contacted by the business and / or contact the business themselves
Keep appraised of leading practices, monitor and evaluate future legislation and market trends in their areas of specialty
Align the innovation agenda with the needs and directions of the SBUs/divisions
Develop and deploy innovative HR policies, products and processes and create strategy, policy, programs, and tools for local implementation
Align policies and solutions across the enterprise as appropriate
Collaborate with each other to deliver comprehensive solutions to the Business Partners
Monitor solutions, vendors, SSC processing, and employee feedback to drive continual improvement
Act as the final escalation point for advice on customer queries, transactions and requests that the SSC cannot resolve
Lead the development of product strategy
Partner BPs in consulting with the business to create innovative solutions when standardized products are not sufficient
Provide subject matter expertise, advice and guidance to BPs and HRS
Support functional specialists in the resolution of complex technical queries and the delivery of streamlined products and services
Research and develop / source best solutions and new concepts with respect to people management, products and services
Coordinate and work with results of internal and external benchmarking to create and share pools of best practice
Design organizational metrics for CoE products and interventions when weaknesses are detected
Partner with HRS when developing new products to ensure effective deliverability
Communicate product changes and updates to BP and HRS
CoEs Attributes CoEs don’t: Subject matter expertise Content strategy development Solution design Policy development Innovation Advisory Consulting Contracting /stakeholder management Matrix management Market intelligence/ best practice (push) Business understanding at Organisational, Regional, Divisional level Metric definition e.g. org effectiveness and product impact Analytical skills (Interpret reporting) Quality and risk management
Undertake operational administrative processing Manage and administer data Manage and perform any operational transactions Consult in systems and administrative process design and development Manage services vendors Interact with employees on day-to-day matters Get involved in the execution of HR policies
Capabilities
Facilitating change
Innovation
Personal and professional impact
Business acumen
Thought leadership
Consulting skills
Client focus
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Shared Services Role Shared Services do:
Provide administrative support for the rest of HR, including:
Manage and process HR transactions (e.g., pay changes, performance management) and provide any retained administrative/ transactional process support
Produce outputs (e.g., standard letters, changes in terms/conditions)
Maintain employee data
Serve as single point of contact for HR queries and requests (when questions can not be answered through self-service)
Resolve queries and requests and escalating to other HR areas as appropriate
Liaise with HR Business Partners and Centers of Expertise to achieve resolution of customer’s queries and requests
Have performance management processes, metrics and vendor management to ensure continuous improvement
Control operational cost and quality
Are governed by service level agreements that meet the needs of the Business Units
Use technology to support customer contact
Provide first point of contact for the provision of employee and manager advice, guidance and query resolution
Significantly reduce HRBP and CoE involvement in routine administrative tasks and inquiries
Provide answers to basic and more complex inquiries
Focus on solution delivery and execution
Perform organizational and data analytics and quality management
Support problem solving, case management and issue resolution
Deliver commoditized products and standardized services
Deliver and maintain self service offerings
Monitor HR compliance
Have specialist expertise e.g. Payroll, training
Have responsibility for implementing necessary changes process changes in partnership with global process owner
Process HR transactions
Shared Services Attributes Shared Services don’t:
Customer service
Transactional processing
Policy measurement/ metrics tracking
Reporting e.g. provision of reports
Technology efficiency improvement
Process efficiency
Cost effectiveness
Management of consistent delivery of services
Vendor management
Query resolution
Analytical skills (KPIs)
Contracting /stakeholder management
Work with managers in solving business challenges
Allow deviation from agreed standard processes and procedures
Service Delivery Models - Leading PracticesThe Shared Services Role Assumptions / Attributes
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Key steps in delivering value through HR
1. Continuously improve HR operations Implement robust systems and leading practices to deliver HR services Establish appropriate service levels and performance targets Maintain a competitive cost structure relative to industry benchmarks Implement Lean Sigma or other continuous improvement methods to help improve operational excellence
2. Communicate the value of HR services Understand the value of HR services Develop execution plans for specific constituencies Implement an integrated communication process and obtain feedback Create an innovative brand statement and/or logo that helps reinforce the HR value proposition
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Conclusion
43
Defining the Value of HR
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Conclusion
1. Understand the Business2. Define your Strategy3. Build Measures4. Assess Current 5. Re-evaluate how HR is Delivered6. Communicate
© 2011 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu45