Top Banner
ISO Confidential Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive Director, Infrastructure Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session March 25, 2016
13

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

Mar 23, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

Neil Millar

Executive Director, Infrastructure Development

Board of Governors Meeting

General Session

March 25, 2016

Page 2: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Approving the plan means approving determinations

and recommendations contained in the plan.

• Thirteen transmission projects:

– All new reliability projects each of which is less than $50 million

– no policy driven projects

– no economically driven projects

• Canceling 13 sub-transmission - primarily local –

previously approved projects in PG&E’s service area

No regional transmission solutions found to be needed are

eligible for competitive solicitation.

Page 2

Page 3: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

The 2015-2016 Transmission Planning Process

Slide 3

Phase 1

Development of ISO unified

planning assumptions and

study plan

• State and Federal policy

requirements and

directives

• Demand forecasts, energy

efficiency, demand

response

• Renewable and

conventional generation

additions and retirements

• Input from stakeholders

Phase 3

• Request for bids, receive

proposals, evaluate, and

award to successful

applicant to build identified

reliability, policy and

economic transmission

projects.

Technical Studies and Board Approval

• Reliability analysis

• Renewable delivery (policy) analysis

• Economic analysis

• Consider Transmission Alternatives, e.g.

preferred resources and energy storage.

• Publish comprehensive transmission plan

Continued regional and sub-regional coordination

October 2016

Coordination of Conceptual

Statewide Plan

April 2015

Phase 2

March 2016

ISO Board Approval

of Transmission Plan

Four Consultation Windows

Page 4: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

New reliability needs reduced from prior cycles,

both in number of projects and capital cost:

Slide 4

Capital

Cost in

$millions

By Service Area

2322

31

15

2 7

3

2

11

9

5

5

11

45

1

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

2010/11 Plan 2011/12 Plan 2012/13 Plan 2013/14 Plan 2014/15 Plan 2015/16 Plan

Pacific Gas & Electric Southern California Edison Co. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. Valley Electric Association

Page 5: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

13 reliability-driven projects are found to be

needed

• 5 projects (red text) were

initially identified in the

planning process and

approved by management.

• The remaining 8 projects

were subsequently

identified and require Board

of Governor approval.

Slide 5

No. Project Name Service AreaExpected In-

Service DateProject Cost

1Panoche – Ora Loma 115 kV Line

ReconductoringPG&E May-21 $20 M

2 Bellota 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $13-19 M

3Cottonwood 115 kV Substation Shunt

ReactorPG&E Dec 2019 $15-19 M

4 Delevan 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $19-28 M

5 Ignacio 230 kV Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $23.4-35.1 M

6Los Esteros 230 kV Substation Shunt

ReactorPG&E Dec 2020 $24-36 M

7 Wilson 115 kV SVC PG&E Dec 2020 $35-45 M

8 15 MVAR Capacitor at Basilone Substation SDG&E Jun-16 $1.5-2 M

930 MVAR Capacitor at Pendleton

SubstationSDG&E Jun-17 $2-3 M

10 Reconductor TL 605 Silvergate – Urban SDG&E Jun-18 $5-6 M

11Second Miguel – Bay Boulevard 230 kV

Transmission CircuitSDG&E Jun-19 $20-45 M

12TL600: “Mesa Heights Loop-in +

ReconductorSDG&E Jun-18 $15-20 M

13 Eagle Mountain Shunt Reactors SCE Dec-18 $10 M

Page 6: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

13 previously approved local PG&E projects are being

cancelled, primarily due to lower load projections

• The projects each were estimated to cost less than $50

million each, and total $192 million.

• 11 projects were initially identified and cancelled by

management.

• 2 projects were subsequently identified and require

Board of Governor approval.

– Monta Vista - Wolfe 115 kV Substation Equipment Upgrade

(Greater Bay Area) - $1 million

– Newark - Applied Materials 115 kV Substation Equipment

Upgrade (Greater Bay Area) – $1 million

Page 6

Page 7: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

The ISO’s policy-driven analysis focused on the 33%

Renewables Portfolio Standard:

• No policy-driven requirements were identified to achieve

the 33% renewables portfolio standard by 2020

• Transmission needs to meet the 50% renewables

portfolio standard by 2030 will be explored in future

planning cycles.

Slide 7

Page 8: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Economic driven solutions were also explored in the

planning process focusing on areas of congestion.

• Consistent with past findings, congestion was not

sufficient to warrant capital upgrades

Slide 8

Page 9: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Other considerations:

• No regional transmission solutions recommended for

approval are eligible for competitive solicitation

• The Lugo-Victorville 500 kV upgrade was found to be

needed and a recommendation will be brought to the

Board after coordination with LADWP has taken place in

the 2016-2017 planning cycle

• The LA Basin/San Diego findings continue to

demonstrate meeting future overall area needs – a

230 kV loading issue has been identified that will be

addressed in the 2016-2017 planning cycle

Page 9

Page 10: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Regional high voltage transmission access charge

projection:

Slide 10

* Existing returns are maintained for existing PTO rate base, and 11% return on equity is

assumed for new transmission capital.

Regional

High

Voltage

TAC

$/MWh

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

2015 Projection

2016 Projection w/o recommended approvals

2016 Projection with recommended approvals

$13.9

$13.8

FERC-approved PTO revenue

requirement increases in 2015 not

related to ISO-approved projects

higher than projected.

Page 11: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Special studies looked at emerging issues preparing

for grid transitioning to low carbon future:

• 50 percent “energy only” study

• Frequency response study

• Gas/electric coordination preliminary study

Efforts in these areas will continue in future planning cycles.

Page 11

Page 12: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Stakeholder feedback provided a wide range of views:

• Concerns about specific projects, and the ISO’s basis for

moving forward

– Projects driven by high voltage concerns

– Previously approved projects

– Projects not recommended for approval

• Deliverability of CPUC-provided 33% renewable

generation portfolios for policy-driven transmission

• Support for continuation of special studies

Page 12

Page 13: Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

ISO Confidential

Management recommends the Board approve the

2015-2016 ISO Transmission Plan.

• Continues to pursue low emissions strategies in

addressing reliability needs of the ISO controlled grid

• Enables the state’s 33% RPS goals and sets a

foundation for higher renewable energy goals

• Provides for prudent and economic development of the

transmission system

Slide 13