Top Banner
1 December, 2010 William Cooter [email protected] Options for Publicly Available Drinking Water Indicators that Conform with EPA’s Sensitive Drinking Water Information Policy
9

December, 2010 William Cooter sid@rti

Jan 20, 2016

Download

Documents

serge

Options for Publicly Available Drinking Water Indicators that Conform with EPA’s Sensitive Drinking Water Information Policy. December, 2010 William Cooter [email protected]. Making Sensitive Information “Non-Sensitive”. Consider Several Alternatives:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

1

December, 2010

William Cooter [email protected]

Options for Publicly Available Drinking Water Indicators that Conform with EPA’s Sensitive Drinking Water Information Policy

Page 2: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

2

Making Sensitive Information “Non-Sensitive”

(1) Develop Indicators for Sensitive Drinking Water Information Based on Suitably Large Polygon Units (HUC12s)

(2) Present Sensitive Drinking Water Information in Terms of Proximity to Non-Sensitive Information

(3) NHDPlus Aquatic Areas of Investigation (Aq-AORs) NEW!

Consider Several Alternatives:

Page 3: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

3

(1) Develop Indicators for Sensitive Drinking Water Information Based on Suitably Large Polygon Units (e.g., HUC12s)

Surface Water Facility Points within HUC12s

The numbers of surface drinking water facilities (intakes, reservoirs, or springs) were determined for each HUC12 subwatershed.

NOTE: Could also be implemented just presenting the number of drinking water SYSTEMS with source waters within HUC12s

Example for Chesapeake Bay Basin

Page 4: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

4

(2) Present Sensitive Drinking Water Information in Terms of Proximity to Non-Sensitive Information

Could create a web service to generate proximity information for each RCRA LQG:

Yes – within a SPA or No – not within a SPA

Page 5: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

5

NEW(3) NHDPlus Aquatic Areas of Investigation (Aq-AORs)

Currently being Implemented for CERCLA 108(b) Hardrock Mining Rule Development

Page 6: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

6

NHDPlus Aquatic Areas of Investigation (Aq-AORs) for Indicator Development

Is a certain type of information present (Yes or No) within the Aq-AOR?

Proximity analyses could use surface and groundwater SPAs

Could apply a wide range of other cross-program information (much of which is already in the DWMA)

Could be applied for many types of point representations of EPA-regulated facilities

Indicator results can be generate nationally for rule development or status and trends tracking

NHDPlus-based Aq-AOR frameworks can also be applied on a site specific basis for management decisions for specific facilities

Page 7: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

7

108b Mines/Facilities within Drinking Water Source Protection Areas

(Surface Sources)

Page 8: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

8

108b Mines/Facilities within Drinking Water Source Protection Areas(Groundwater Sources)

Page 9: December, 2010  William Cooter sid@rti

9

December, 2010

William Cooter [email protected]

Options for Publicly Available Drinking Water Indicators that Conform with EPA’s Sensitive Drinking Water Information Policy