DEAN MINETT, H. RUHI YAMAN, BASAK DENIZCI INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT 28 (2009) 486–493 Leadership styles and ethical decision- making.

DEAN MINETT , H. RUHI YAMAN , BASAK DENIZCI

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT 28 (2009)

486–493

Leadership styles and ethical decision-making in hospitality

management

MA2M0102 吳佳蓁

Abstract

This study examined the ways in which hospitality leaders in Australia seek to influence others in the workplace.

133 hotel managers participated in this study, of which 91 provided answers to all questions.

The results indicate that the prevailing leadership styles in Australia are a blend of Machiavellian and Bureaucratic styles and that variance in this choice correlates with the age of the respondent. That is, older managers are less inclined to use a utilitarian or rule-based ethical decision-making style, and more inclined to embrace a social contract or personality ethic approach.

1. Introduction and literature review

Hitt’s aligned model of being, ethical systems and leadership styles.

1. Introduction and literature review

HypothesesHypothesis 1. The older the managers in the hospitality industry,

the higher usage of transformational leadership that will be utilized.

Hypothesis 2. Female managers in the hospitality industry will

demonstrate a higher usage of transformational leadership styles

than males.

Hypothesis 3. Managers’ leadership styles will differ according to

organizational characteristics.

2. Methodology

2.1. Instrument and procedureThis study uses a leadership and influence

questionnaire developed by Girodo (1998).26 statements which present an ethical belief

about how workers could be influenced on the job by the person in charge.

The ancillary questionnaire (age, gender, years of experience in industry, years of experience as a manager, level of education attained, organizational structure and size)

2. Methodology

2.2. Data collection133 responses received,

of which 91 provided answers to all questionsHotels included were those rated three stars or

aboveData were collected via direct mail to selected

general managers with whom the researcher has a relationship and who agreed to allow their staff to participate, and from direct contact.

3. Findings

3.1. Leadership and influence questionnaire

3. Findings

3. Findings

Table 2

3. Findings

Table 3

3. Findings

Table 4

3. Findings

3.2. Tests of the hypotheses Hypothesis 1. The older the managers in the hospitality

industry, the higher usage of transformational leadership that

will be utilized.

Subsequent T-tests indicate that use of both the MB1 and

MB2 leadership style does decline with age.

These findings support the hypothesis.

3. Findings

3.2. Tests of the hypotheses Hypothesis 2. Female managers in the hospitality industry

will demonstrate a higher usage of transformational

leadership styles than males.

multi-variate analysis found that the only significant variation

in leadership style related to the age of the respondent, there

was no variation found in leadership style preference

according to gender.

As such the hypothesis is rejected.

3. Findings

3.2. Tests of the hypotheses

Hypothesis 3. Managers’ leadership styles will differ

according to organizational characteristics.

There has been no variation found in leadership style

preference according to the size of organization, time

with the organization, annual turnover, number of staff,

age of the organization.

This hypothesis is also rejected.

4. Discussion and conclusions

The results indicate that the leadership style, and hence

ethical decision-making style, of managers varies only

according to age of the respondent. There is no significant

variation according to gender, years of experience, position

held in the organization or level of education achieved.

There are also other important factors that are relevant to

the discussion and were not addressed in the present study.

Further research should explore the influence of alternative

variables on leadership styles, such as communication styles.

Thanks for your attention.