DCD in the United Kingdom Dr Paul Murphy Consultant in Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care, Leeds, UK National Clinical Leed for Organ Donation, NHS Blood and Transplant
DCD in the United Kingdom
Dr Paul Murphy
Consultant in Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care, Leeds, UK
National Clinical Leed for Organ Donation, NHS Blood and Transplant
The Black Mountains, South Wales
DCD in the United KingdomWhere we are, how we got there and where we
are going
• Current status
– Donor and transplant numbers
– Transplant outcomes
• Implementation of the UK
programme
– Overcoming the obstacles
• Challenges and opportunities
DCD in the United KingdomWhere we are, how we got there and where we
are going
The Black Mountains, South Wales
Deceased donation in the United KingdomBackground
• UK-wide service
– NHS Blood and Transplant
• UK-wide network of donation leads
– Hospital clinicians
– Specialist nurses
– Donation Committee Chairs
• Potential donor audit
– All ICU and ED deaths up to age of 80 years
• Consent
– Opt-in: England, Northern Ireland and Scotland
– Opt-out: Wales
– Opt-in / opt-out register
Deceased donation in the United KingdomBackground
• UK-wide service
– NHS Blood and Transplant
• UK-wide network of donation leads
– Hospital clinicians
– Specialist nurses
– Donation Committee Chairs
• Potential donor audit
– All ICU and ED deaths up to age of 80 years
• Consent
– Opt-in: England, Northern Ireland and Scotland
– Opt-out: Wales
– Opt-in / opt-out register
DCD in the United KingdomBackground
• Launched in 2003
• Maastricht III
– Organ retrieval after death that follows planned withdrawal of life sustaining
treatment
– 80% deaths on ICU in UK follow planned treatment withdrawal
• Diagnose death after 5 minutes asystole
• Current prohibition on ante mortem interventions
– Heparin
– Femoral cannulation
• Organ retrieval
– Rapid laparotomy / cooling as standard
– Increasing interest in in situ and ex situ organ resuscitation
Current statusDCD donors in UK, 2002-17
Actu
al D
CD
do
no
rs
Current statusDeceased donors in UK, 2002-17
21.8 donors
pmp
12.9
8.9
Actu
al deceased d
onors
Deceased donors, transplants and the
transplant waiting list 2007-2017
809 899 959 1010 10881212 1320 1282 1364 1413
23812552 2645 2695
29123112
35143342
35313712
6476
69437026
78007997
78777655 7636
7288
6389
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Nu
mb
er
Donors
Transplants
Transplant list
Kidney transplantation in UKContribution of DCD
Long term renal replacement therapy in UK
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Dialysis
Transplant
Long term renal replacement therapy in UK
Organ Donation and Transplantation in Canada:
System Progress Report 2006–2015
10.8
5.9 8.4
8.310.0
8.0
12.5
9.4
8.87.9 11.4
5.8
Variation in DCD numbers in the UK
10.8
5.9 8.4
8.310.0
8.0
12.59.4
8.87.9 11.4
5.8
Variation in DCD numbers in the UK
Source of DCD donorsBy donation potential of UK hospitals
www.odt.nhs.uk/statistics-and-
reports/annual-activity-report/
In last 24 months,
209 / 232 donor
hospitals in UK had
at least 1 actual
DCD donor
Hospitals with > 12
potential donors /
year
Hospitals with 6 - 12
potential donors / year
Hospitals with
3 – 5 potential
donors / year
Hospitals with < 3
potential donors /
year
DCD in the UK 2007
• Lawfulness
– Alteration in end of life care
– Ante mortem interventions
• Conflict of interest
– Public acceptability
• Diagnosis of death
– Dead donor rule
– Post mortem interventions
Implementation of DCDOrgan Donation Taskforce report
Donation should not be viewed as something
optional, something to be inflicted upon
patients and families after end of life care for
the benefit of a third party.
2008
Implementation of DCDOrgan Donation Taskforce report
Donation should not be viewed as something
optional, something to be inflicted upon
patients and families after end of life care for
the benefit of a third party.
Rather, it should be considered to be a
fundamental component of end of life care
and not denied to patients because they are
dying in the wrong place or in the wrong way.
2008
X
Implementation of DCDLegal guidance
• In many cases, actions that can facilitate
DCD most successfully will be in the
person’s best interests.
– Blood sampling
– Maintenance of physiological stability
– Delayed treatment withdrawal
– Altered location of treatment withdrawal2009
Implementation of DCDProfessional guidance
• Death can be confirmed after 5 minutes of
complete and continuous absence of
cardio-respiratory function
• Death is confirmed by demonstrating the
absence of neurological function
(respiration, consciousness and brain-
stem reflexes) after 5 minutes of
continuous asystole.2010
Implementation of DCDUK Donation Ethics Committee
Principle 1: Where donation is likely to be a
possibility, full consideration should be given to the
matter when caring for a dying patient.
Principle 2: If it has been established that further life-
sustaining treatment is not of overall benefit to the
patient, and it has been further established that
donation would be consistent with the patient’s
wishes, values and beliefs, consideration of donation
should become an integral part of the patient’s care
in their last days and hours
2011
UK organ donor pathways 2016-17
%o
fp
ote
nt i
ald
on
ors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Potentialdonors1
Neurologicaldeath testsperformed(DBD only)
Neurologicaldeath
confirmed(DBD only)
Contraindications Familyapproach
Consent/authorisation
Donation
DBD, 819 donated (46% of potential donors)DCD, 565 donated (10% of potential donors, 13% of those not contraindicated)
14% 1%4%
8%
31%
11%
23%
57%
42%
46%
http://www.odt.nhs.uk/statistics-and-reports/annual-activity-report/
DBD donor pathway, 2016-17
%o
fp
ote
nt i
ald
on
ors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Potentialdonors1
Neurologicaldeath testsperformed(DBD only)
Neurologicaldeath
confirmed(DBD only)
Contraindications Familyapproach
Consent/authorisation
Donation
Figure 13.3
1
1
1
819 of 1780 potential DBD donors donated (46% conversion)
14% 1%4%
8%
31%11%
1775 potential
DBD donors
819 actual
DBD donors
DCD donor pathway, 2016-17
%o
fp
ote
nt i
ald
on
ors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Potentialdonors1
Neurologicaldeath testsperformed(DBD only)
Neurologicaldeath
confirmed(DBD only)
Contraindications Familyapproach
Consent/authorisation
Donation
Figure 13.3
1
565 of 5650 potential donors donated (10% conversion)
23%
57%
42%
46%
5522 potential
DCD donors
565 actual
DCD donors
DCD donor pathway, 2016-17
%o
fp
ote
nt i
ald
on
ors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Potentialdonors1
Neurologicaldeath testsperformed(DBD only)
Neurologicaldeath
confirmed(DBD only)
Contraindications Familyapproach
Consent/authorisation
Donation
Figure 13.3
1
565 of 5650 potential donors donated (10% conversion)
23%
57%
42%
46%
5522 potential
DCD donors
565 actual
DCD donors
UK donation balance sheet, 2016-17
DBD DCD
Potential donors 1775 5522
Family approaches 1329 1815
Consents 917 1055
Attendances by abdominal retrieval teams 841 911
Actual donors 819 565
Organs retrieved 3100 1601
Transplants 2714 1287
Transplants / family approach 2.04 0.71
UK donation balance sheet, 2016-17
DBD DCD
Potential donors 1775 5522
Family approaches 1329 1815
Consents 917 1055
Attendances by abdominal retrieval teams 841 911
Actual donors 819 565
Organs retrieved 3100 1601
Transplants 2714 1287
Transplants / family approach 2.04 0.71
UK donation balance sheet, 2016-17
DBD DCD
Potential donors 1775 5522
Family approaches 1329 1815
Consents 917 1055
Attendances by abdominal retrieval teams 841 911
Actual donors 819 565
Organs retrieved 3100 1601
Transplants 2714 1287
Transplants / family approach 2.04 0.71
UK donation balance sheet, 2016-17
DBD DCD
Potential donors 1775 5522
Family approaches 1329 1815
Consents 917 1055
Attendances by abdominal retrieval teams 841 911
Actual donors 819 565
Organs retrieved 3100 1601
Transplants 2714 1287
Transplants / family approach 2.04 0.71
UK family consent rates
Reasons for family refusal
http://www.odt.nhs.uk/statistics-
and-reports/potential-donor-
audit/
Family refusal in DCD
Duration of the DCD pathway
Referral ApproachWithdrawal of life sustaining
treatment
Retrieval operation
startTransplant
Timing of treatment withdrawal
10.8
5.9 8.4
8.310.0
8.0
12.59.4
8.87.9 11.4
5.8
Audit of diagnosis of death in DCD
• N = 68, single regional team, Apr 2015 – Feb 2016
• No record in donor care file = 13
• Documented compliance with professional guidance
– 5 minutes observation – 64%
– Pupillary light reflex – 93%
– Supra-orbital pressure – 59%
– Corneal reflex – 30%
• Documented non-compliance with professional
guidance
– 3 patients observed for ONE minute
– 3 patients observed for TWO minutes
– 1 patient observed for THREE minutes Chris Booth, Salford
North West OD Team
Organ utilisation from DCD donors
DCD donors
• 42% of all donors
• 41% of kidneys
• 24% of livers
• 19% of lungs
• 35% of all
transplants
Annual activity report 2016/17
http://www.odt.nhs.uk/uk-transplant-registry/annual-activity-report/
Organ utilisation from DCD donorsLiver
Ischaemic cholangiopathy Normothermic regional perfusion
Organ utilisation from DCD donorsHeart
Retrieval / tx
centre
Direct
procurement
Normothermic
Regional
Perfusion
Survival to
discharge1
Harefield 6 - 4 / 6
Papworth 14 18 29 / 31
Manchester 3 - 2 / 2
Total 20 21 35 / 39
1Two recently transplanted patients are excluded
Strengths• Sound professional
framework
• 41% of all deceased
donors, 32% of transplants
• Expands possibility of
donation to more patients /
hospitals
Opportunities• Improved organ utilisation
• Reperfusion technologies
• DCD heart
transplantation
Threats• Uncontrolled lengthening
of pathway
• Variation in how death is
diagnosed
Weaknesses• Resource intensive
• Fewer donor organs
• Harder on some families
• Frustrating for staff
DCD in the UK