Water Supply Data Management, Infrastructure Planning & Asset Management Peter Styles 26 th July 2011 Day 2 Capital Investment Programming
Water Supply Data Management, Infrastructure Planning & Asset Management
Peter Styles26th July 2011
Day 2Capital Investment Programming
• Why do we need a program?
• How does it fit together?
• Stages of project development
• Reporting
Contents
STRATEGICPLANNING
New development
PROJECTAPPRAISAL
What to do withassets
PROGRAMMEMANAGEMENT
Making or replacingassets
Strategies Team Programme Team
Planning functions
ASSETMANAGEMENT
Existing assets
3
Why do we need a program?
•Enables us to manage projects
•Demonstrates progress
•Summarises information in one place
•Provides basis for reports
•Provides a record of what has been done(and not done!)
New Policiesand Standards
•Asset data•Performance•Condition•Valuation
LONG TERM (25 yr) PROGRAM
•Projections•Policies•Financial profile
FIVE YEARPROGRAMME
APPRAISALPROCESS
CONSTRUCTIONDELIVERY OFOUTPUTS
INVENTORY
STRATEGIES
DemandForecasts
AMPData
Knownprojects
Data
Asset Management Cycle
• Long term plan – covers next 25 years(mainly used for financial planning)
• Medium term plan - covers next 5 years(used for project delivery)
• Service/outputs driven• Records costs• Plans timescales• Assigns responsibilities
Capital Investment Program (CIP)
• Cover full life of the assets
• Provide an Audit Trail
• Results in optimum solution
• Provides framework for programme management
Project procedures
• Identification of need
• Stage 1 Feasibility/appraisal
• Stage 2 Detailed design
• Stage 3 Construction
• Stage 4 Commissioning
• Stage 5 Post Appraisal
Stages of a project
Where does it come from?
• from operators• from surveys• from strategies/action plans• from customers
Identification of need
• Records problems that needs investment
• NOT request for specific work
• Request to investigate problem
• Defined in terms of Levels of Service, Policy, Performance/Condition or legal requirement
Identification of need
• Problem confirmed with need for capital• LoS deficiencies quantified• Demand forecast• Alternative solutions identified• Solutions compared and costed• Financial analysis carried out• Preferred solution proposed • Approval sought
Stage 1 – Feasibility / Appraisal
• Results of any feasibility study
• Evaluation of the options
• Financial analysis
• Recommends solution
• Seeks approval to next stage
Appraisal - Business Case
• Standard format
• Alternative solutions analysed and compared:- Net Present Value (DCF)- Cost/benefit- Profit/Loss
• Horizon 25 years(covers period of M&E replacement)
Appraisal - Financial Analysis
• Cash flow for both capital and revenue expenditure compiled
• Each year discounted by factor from DCF table
• Sum of the DCF’s gives Net Present Value
• The recommended option normally lowest NPV
• Sensitivity checked with different discount rates
Appraisal - Net Present Value (DCF)
• Takes costs from project
• Takes benefits from investment
• Calculates ratio:
total cost of projecttotal benefits from project
Appraisal – Cost / Benefit
• Gross profit or loss calculated as:
Income less expenditure
• Income is charges received plus grants and contributions
• Expenditures are interest, depreciation, costs and overheads
[Mostly used by private sector who have shareholders]
Appraisal - Profit and Loss
• Environmental Impact Analysisall aspects of the option are scored
• SWOT analysisStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
• Whole life costing [DCF]
Acquire, operate and dismantle
Appraisal – Other Issues
Examples of Option Appraisals
SWOT Analysis:• Strengths• Weakness• Opportunities• Threats
Environmental Impact Impact (-5 to +5)Land take +2Resource use / waste generation -3Proximity of WTW to sources +5Energy usage -2Location / Visual Impacts +4Bathing water quality +5Repairs and Maintenance +1Transportation -3Nuisance +3
Option 20 year OPEX
Total 20 year CAPEX and OPEX
Net Present Value (6% p.a. discount rate)
Option 1Increase Bellozanne WTW £103 million £269 million £224 million
Option 3Retain Bellozanne WTW+ La Rosiere
£105 million £292 million £242 million
Option 6Relocate to La Collette £99 million £282 million £231 million
• Consultation with Operators on – Timing– phasing
• Project Manager appointed
• Design brief compiled
• Designer appointed
Stage 2 – Detailed Design
• Contract estimates approved
• Contractors selected to tender
• Tenders assessed
• Contract let
• Construction
Stage 3 - Construction
• Construction completed
• Assets commissioned
• Handover to Operator
• Checks on outputs and benefits
• Records and Procedures updated
Stage 4 - Commissioning
• Benefits achieved?
• Timescales?
• Costs within budget?
• Special problems?
• Lessons learned?
Stage 5 – Post Appraisal
• Programme to Board for approval• Programme to Government for agreement• Projects to Agencies for ‘no objection’• Outlines costs, timescales and outputs• Monthly expenditure profile• Based on updated AM Plan• Programming Margin built-in
Annual Reporting
• Normally a Government requirement
• Covers costs, dates, outputs by scheme
• Provides monthly cash profile forecast
Quarterly Report
• Internal report for management and Board• Up-to-date review of capital programme• Covers all expenditure in current year and
next year• Reported by individual projects• Contains latest and projected costs• Contains timescales and key dates
Monthly Reporting
• Monthly reports on: costsdatesoutputs
• Report at the ‘contract’ level
• By location within a Contract or Project
Funding Agency Reports
Strategies+ Asset Management Plan+ Project Appraisal+ Programme Management
= Capital Investment Program
Summary