ROAD MAP PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM 2011-2016 Commission on Higher Education
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ROAD MAP PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM
2011-2016
Commission on Higher Education
Table 1. Number of Philippine Higher Institutions and Enrollment by Type2010-2011
Institutional Type/AY Number Enrollment2000-2001 2010-2011 2000-2001 2010-2011
Total HEIs (excluding SUCs campuses) 1,380 1,823 2,229,645 2,504,855Total HEIs (including SUCs campuses) 1,603 2,247 2,430,842 2,937,847
Public 166 219 771,162 1,193,851
State Universities and Colleges (SUCs)
107 110 499,002 607,867
SUCs Campuses 223 424 201,197 432,992
Local Universities and Colleges (LUCs)
40 93 61,954 145,698
Others (include OGS, CSI, Special HEI)
19 16 9,009 7,294
Private 1,214 1,604 1,659,680 1,743,996
Sectarian 312 334 527,753 466,977
Non-Sectarian 902 1,270 1,131,927 1,277,019
Rationale Compared to higher education, basic
education–yields greater social returns, and its provision is the more fundamental duty of the state
With K-12, current shortages (classrooms, textbooks, teachers, etc) and demand for international comparability, basic education will be prioritized in allocation of government resources
Private sector will continue to contribute significantly to higher education delivery
Objective
General: (with whatever modest resources generated)
maximize public higher education's contribution towards producing competent high level professionals and generating knowledge and technologies for national development and competitiveness
Objectives Specific:1. To rationalize the public higher education
system, improve its internal and external efficiency, optimize resource utilization and maximize resource generation;
2. To improve quality and standards of higher education raise the level of educational outcomes and increase the social relevance of its developmental functions; and
3. To expand access to quality higher education among lower income and disadvantaged groups
Public Higher Education Reform Overall Framework
MilestonesObjective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives Milestones1. Rationalization of SUCs distribution and growth
GIS based map of HEIs and programs completed by 2011, and continuously updated thereafterBlueprint for public HEI system developed by 2012
Three (3) RUS and two (2) specialized HEIs pilot tested from 2012 to 2016: RUS bill in process during Plan period
MilestonesObjective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives Milestones2. Rationalization of programs
Typology framework developed by 2011 and initially implemented in 2012, and all SUCs and LUCs classified by 2013SUCs programs outside mandates, duplicative and inefficient identified by 2011, 30% ordered for phase out/closure by 2012 and 100% in 2013-2016*New academic programs developed and launched in critical high level professional disciplines, e.g. geology, meteorology by 2013
*Total number of SUCs programs = 12,246 higher education + 1200 preschool, elem, H.S. & TechVoc
MilestonesObjective 1. Improve Efficiency
Initiatives Milestones3. Rationalization of resources
Generic socialized tuition fee scheme designed by 2013, and piloted in 5 SUCs in 2014-2016Normative funding formula revised by 2012, revised formula applied on 100% of SUCs MOOE and simulated on PS by 2013, then fully applied on both MOOE and PS by 201622 Leading SUCs with viable IGPs by 2013, with 50% of their budget accounted for by internally generated income by 2016Plan for digitization and automation formulated by 2012, fully implemented in accordance with GIFMIS in 20% of SUCs by 2014, in all SUCs by 2016
MilestonesObjective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives Milestones4. Quality assurance of SUCs/LUCs
All authorized unaccredited SUCs programs evaluated by 2012; 20% substandard and non-performing programs closed or phased out in 2012 and 80% from 2013 to 2016Improved performance of SUCs graduates in licensure examinations in priority disciplines (within their mandates) to 50% passing by 2016*85 SUCs programs supported for accreditation in 2012, and 340 programs from 2013 to 2016
5. Faculty development
500 SUC faculty scholars supported in 2012 and 2000 from 2013 to 2016**
*Baseline 2010 = 31%**15,566 SUCs faculty (41.9%) w/o grad deg in 2010-2011; 22,966 or 58% w/ grad deg (total 39,532); target will increase to 64.4%
MilestonesObjective 2. Upgrade quality
Initiatives Milestones6. Upgrading leading SUCs to International Standards
5 R&D Centers established in SUCs and supported in 2012, and 10 from 2013 to 2016
15 CHED-funded SUCs R&D projects implemented in 2012, and 30 during 2013-2016
6 SUCs extension programs conducted for the NAPC identified focus municipalities
45 COEs/Ds in SUCs identified & processed with 25 supported in 2012; 150 processed with 100 supported from 2013-2016
3 SUCs in the top leading universities in the world by 2016
MilestonesObjective 3. Enhance access
Initiatives Milestones7. Modernizing developing SUCs
89 developing SUCs outside highly urbanized areas supported
8. STUFAPs Harmonized/integrated scheme of STUFAPs instituted through intergovernment/agency collaboration
11,360 STUFAP beneficiaries in SUCs in 2012 and 44,000 from 2013-2016, from poor and disadvantaged families, especially in NAPC focus communities
Milestones
Crosscutting
MilestonesExecutive DevelopmentProgram
550 SUCs managers trained in 2012; 2000 in 2013-2016
Institutionalization thru establishment of Higher Education Academy and HE career system conceptualized
Fund Source 2011-2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
HEDF (1) 22.00 22.88 25.17 27.68 30.45 128.19
DAP (2) 56.00 30.80 33.88 37.27 40.99 198.94
subtotal 78.00 53.68 59.05 64.95 71.45 327.13
HEDF (3) 286.00 397.44 437.18 480.90 528.99 2,130.52
DAP (4) 3,135.00 1,724.25 1,896.68 2,086.34 2,294.98 11,137.24
GAA (5) 597.16 621.04 683.15 751.46 826.61 3,479.41
subtotal 4,018.16 2,742.73 3,017.01 3,318.71 3,650.58 16,747.18
HEDF (6) 88.60 13.29 1.99 0.00 0.00 103.88
DAP (7) 927.80 1,020.58 1,122.64 1,234.90 1,358.39 5,664.31
GAA (8) 60.34 72.41 86.90 104.28 125.13 449.06
subtotal 1,076.74 1,106.28 1,211.53 1,339.18 1,483.52 6,217.25
DAP 165.00 100.00 110.00 121.00 133.10 629.10
subtotal 165.00 100.00 110.00 121.00 133.10 629.10
5,337.90 4,002.69 4,397.58 4,843.84 5,338.65 23,920.66
(1) HEDF allocation for Institutional Capacity Building for SUCs(2) Disbursement Acceleration program (DAP) Grant-In-Aids for SUCs - RDE, retained by PIDs(3) HEDF allocation for COE/COD, Quality Assurance, Research and Faculty Development Programs (FDP) for SUCs(4) DAP for infrastructure for leading SUCs, DAP for RDE less PIDS' share(5) GAA allocation for NAFES, Faculty Development and Growth Areas(6) HEDF allocation for STUFAP(7) DAP allocation for GIA for Poverty Alleviation and for modernizing facilities of developing SUCs(8) GAA Allocation for STUFAP
TOTAL
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS (in Million Pesos)
For Quality
For Access3
Crosscutting4
2
Initiatives
For Effi ciency1
Related Documents
