Top Banner
David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008
48

David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Dylan Hart
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

David TudorOSPI Special EducationProgram Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-ConferenceMarch 20, 2008

Page 2: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Discuss different types of assessments and structure of an assessment system

• Evaluate data to make program/instructional decisions

• Model effective reading and mathematics strategies

Page 3: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Assessment – process of collecting a behavior sample (data).

• Evaluation – process of using information to make a reasoned decision.

Howell & Nolet (2000). Curriculum Based Evaluation (3rd edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomas Learning

Page 4: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

1. Define your purpose2. Define the thing to be measured3. Devise a way to make the

measured item observable4. Conduct assessment5. Evaluate results6. Summarize7. Make decisions

Page 5: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Assessments are an essential element of education used to inform instruction. (Wren 2000)

• Assessments provide teachers with information needed to develop appropriate lessons and improve instruction for all students, including students with disabilities (Rhodes and Shanklin,1993)

• Frequent assessment of developing readers, and the use of that information for planning instruction, is the most reliable way of preventing children from falling behind and staying behind (Learning First Alliance 2000, Torgesen 1998 )

Page 6: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• In order to meet the higher expectations of current standards-based systems, educators need information that can be used to project how students are doing against the grade-level standards throughout the course of the year so they can determine what needs to be done to accelerate student progress toward proficiency standards. Progress monitoring techniques can provide that information (Quenomoen,R., Thurlow,M., Moen, R., Thompson ,S. &Morse, A.B. 2003)

• Educators in effective schools consistently use reading assessments that inform and shape the instructional programs designed to help students meet established benchmarks ( Denton, Foorman, et al., 2003)

Page 7: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Reliable: A reliable measure is one that produces dependable scores. Scores are similar no matter who tests the student. Assessments close in time yield similar results. An assessment is determined to be reliable if there is a high correlation between the scores on the two times the student was tested

• Valid: A valid measure is an assessment that measures the trait or ability that it says it will measure

Page 8: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Fidelity refers to the degree to which components are implemented as designed, intended, and planned.

• Fidelity is vital in universal screening, instructional delivery and progress monitoring.

Page 9: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Formative: On-going assessments, reviews, observations in a classroom. Teachers use formative assessments to improve instructional methods and student feed back throughout the teaching and learning process.

• Summative: Used to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs and services at the end of an academic year or at a predetermined time. Measure student competency after an instructional phase is complete (example-- WASL). Summative evaluations are used to determine if students have mastered specific competencies and identify instructional areas where additional help is needed.(Florida Center on Reading Research, 2005)

Page 10: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Outcome – measure effectiveness of overall instructional program

• Screening / Benchmark – quick and efficient. Measure a student’s current achievement based on grade-level performance standards

• Diagnostic – define a student’s weaknesses and strengths with critical skills

• Progress Monitoring – measure of progress towards academic goals related to current instruction

• Informal – provide student level information, but are not standardized or normed

Page 11: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.
Page 12: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Discuss the key elements of valid and reliable assessments.

• What are the benefits of having an assessment system?

Page 13: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Primary users are teachers, school administrators, district level administrators, state education agencies, and policy decision makers.

• Measures what content and skills have been mastered.

• High stakes summative assessments measure program effectiveness and normative student achievement.

• Usually administered once a year but could also be used to measure an end of semester study unit.

(K- 12 Reading Model pg. 39)

Page 14: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• School staff conduct universal screening in all academic areas and behavior to all students three times/year

• Purpose of universal screening is to identify students “at risk” for academic or behavior failure

• Universal screening data tells us whether a child is on track compared to peer group and/or state standards

• The student’s data at benchmark testing periods can be utilized to validate the effectiveness of intervention. Is the gap closing?

Page 15: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• All students are screened to determine which students are suspected to be at risk for academic and/or behavioral difficulty. • Some students suspected to be at risk

continue in Tier I with progress monitoring;

• Progress monitoring:• Confirms or disproves risk (false positive)

Page 16: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Dig

its

Co

rrec

t in

on

e m

inu

te

3rd Grade Math Addition and Subtraction 0-18

Page 17: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

3rd Grade Addition and Subtraction 0-18

010203040506070

John Su

eSteve

Sherry

BridgetMike

Larisa

CarleyTomEliasTylerEvanZane

Kadon

Jasmine

NicoleGina

Cardenas

TiffanyKris

ShermanAaronSkye

Graham

Roxann

Dig

its

Co

rrec

t in

On

e M

inu

te

Page 18: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• http://kmnet.renlearn.com/Library/R003979401GG1107.pdf

• http://kmnet.renlearn.com/Library/R003979501GGAA93.pdf

Page 19: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Why is it essential to administer screening assessments?

• What are the unique challenges faced by institutional education centers?

• How can institutional education centers mitigate unique challenges?

Page 20: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Primary users - teachers, students and parents

• Promote academic growth while students are progressing to meet standards.

• Measure for ongoing, specific instructional decisions based on data outcome.

• Includes curriculum-based assessments (CBAs), curriculum-based measures (CBMs), daily, informal observations, curriculum tasks, informal or formal tests (K- 12 Reading Model pg. 39)

Page 21: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Progress monitoring is a scientifically based practice that uses a set of standardized assessment procedures for determining the extent to which students are benefiting from classroom instruction and for monitoring effectiveness of curriculum on a regular basis.

• Progress monitoring can be implemented with individual students or an entire class.

• National Center on Student Progress Monitoring• Formative assessment – process of monitoring

student achievement during instruction.• CBMs are primarily used as a method for progress

monitoring because they are brief, easy to administer and score, and are good predictors of student ability

Page 22: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Standard assessment tools… • Reliable• Valid• Sensitive• Capacity to model growth• Independent• Feasible

• That are the same difficulty and that are… • Given the same way each time.

Page 23: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Curriculum-based measurements (CBM)• Original work from Deno, 1985• Establish entry-level performance relative to

long term goal and note trends (How does the individual compare to the whole? Dual discrepancy)

• Good predictors of student achievement• Have a prescribed methodology which

increases validity and reliability• Include systematic procedures for analyzing

and summarizing information

Page 24: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Monitoring Basic Skills Progress (Pro-Ed Online, 2006);

• DIBELS (2006);• Intervention CBM probes (Interventioncentral.org) FREE

• AIMSweb (2006)

Page 25: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• The same kind of evaluation technology as other The same kind of evaluation technology as other professions…professions…• DoctorsDoctors• Stock brokersStock brokers

• PowerfulPowerful measures that are:

• SimpleSimple

• AccurateAccurate

• EfficientEfficient indicators of student achievement that guide/inform a variety of decisions decisions

Page 26: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Are designed to serve as “Are designed to serve as “indicatorsindicators” ”

of general math achievement. of general math achievement.

• Are Are standardized testsstandardized tests to be given, to be given,

scored, and interpreted in a standard scored, and interpreted in a standard

way.way.

• Are Are researchedresearched with respect to with respect to

psychometric properties to ensure psychometric properties to ensure

accurate measures of learning.accurate measures of learning.

Page 27: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

27

• Math probes are administered 2 to 4 minutes Math probes are administered 2 to 4 minutes

depending upon the Grade Level of the assessment depending upon the Grade Level of the assessment

material.material.

• Emphasis is placed on Emphasis is placed on what students do correctlywhat students do correctly..Grade Level

Timing Test Arrangement What is Scored

1 - 3 2 minutes

Individual, small, or large group

Correct digits in answer

3 4 minutes

Individual, small, or large group

Correct digits in answer

5 -6 4 minutes

Individual, small, or large group

Correct digits in answer or

Correct digits in answer & critical process

Page 28: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Oral reading fluency (ORF)

• 3 minute cloze comprehension

• Definitions

Page 29: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Using aggregate tables activity• Using the aggregate table (green sheets) in your

handouts, with a partner, for Grade 5 and 6 identify: • Winter benchmark levels within the 50th-75th %• Number of students in the spring sample• The ROI for the 25th percentile

• ROI Formula=ROI is the spring score – fall score (or winter – fall) divided by 36 weeks (or 18 weeks, depending on the number of instructional weeks).

• Num = Number of students • WRC = words read correctly• ROI = Rate of improvement.

Page 30: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

Fall Winter SpringGrade

%ile Num CD Num CD Num CD ROI

5

90

6944

51

7603

60

8023

73 0.6

75 40 48 61 0.6

50 30 38 49 0.5

25 23 28 36 0.4

10 15 18 25 0.3

Mean

32 39 49

StDv 15 17 20

Page 31: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

Fall Winter SpringGrade

%ile

Num CD Num CD Num CD ROI

6

90

2692

53

3654

69

3318

65 0.3

75 39 50 47 0.2

50 27 37 33 0.2

25 20 27 25 0.1

10 14 21 21 0.2Mea

n32 42 39

StDv

21 23 23

Page 32: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

100

95

90

85

80

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

12

13

Word

s R

ead C

orr

ect

X

XX

Page 33: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

100

95

90

85

80

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11

12

13

Word

s R

ead C

orr

ect

XX

X XX X

XX

XX

XX

X

XX

X

Page 34: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• New Practitioner Briefs Added to NCSPM Library!Two new practitioner briefs on website; the first is What Is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will It Help Me?

• The second is Getting Started:  How Do I Implement CBM in My School?

• Both briefs are geared toward administrators, but are beneficial for teachers and families as well.

• http://www.studentprogress.org

34

Page 35: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Would progress monitoring be effective within institutional education centers?

• Why or why not?• What is currently in place?• What needs to be added?

Page 36: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Targeted assessment means shifting to evaluations that are designed around the specific “targeted” concerns of the student.

• In other words, we select assessments that measure the area of concern rather than administering an assessment and then trying to determine what it means.

• http://www.k12.wa.us/CurriculumInstruct/Reading/default.aspx

Page 37: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.
Page 38: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.
Page 39: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

The questions that p_____ face as the raise ch________ from in_______ to adult life are not easy to an________. Both fa______ and m________ can become concerned when health problems such as co_______ arise any time after the e______ stage to later life. Experts recommend that young ch______ should have plenty of s______ and nutritious food for healthy growth. B______ and g______ should not share the same b_______ or even sleep in the same r______. They may be afraid of the d_____.

- Teaching Reading in the Content Areas. 2nd edition. Billmeyer and Barton, 1998.

Page 40: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Reading• Decoding/Phonemic Awareness• Fluency• Vocabulary• Comprehension

• Mathematics• Low stress strategies

Page 41: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Research related to adjudicated youth is limited.

• DeBoer, Malmgren, Glass (November, 2006) Reading Instruction for Youth with EBD in a Juvenile Correctional Facility

Page 42: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

For students with low comprehension...

For students with high comprehension...

For students with low fluency...

•Assess phonemic awareness and teach if necessary.•Assess decoding and teach if necessary.•Teach fluency explicitly.•Teach comprehension.•Work on vocabulary.

•Assess decoding and teach if necessary.•Teach fluency explicitly.•Challenge with high-level comprehension and vocabulary.

For students with high fluency...

•Work on vocabulary.•Teach comprehension.

•Challenge with high-level comprehension and vocabulary.Adapted from Hasbrouck & Tindal (2006)

http://www.readnaturally.com/howto/whoNeeds.htm

Page 43: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Choral reading• Cloze reading• Speedy Syllables• Assisted Reading Practice• 6 Minute Solution• Paired Reading

Page 44: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Morphemic Elements•Affix concentration•Meaningful Affixes•Graphic organizers

Page 45: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Collaborative Strategic Reading (Klingner & Vaughn, 1998)

• Strategic Instruction Model (Deschler & Schumaker, 1988)

Page 46: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• Lattice multiplication• Lattice addition• Skip zeroes• Duplation• Thoughts about Presentation

• Think Alouds

Page 47: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

• www.edhelper.com• http://www.khake.com/page3.html

• Skills for Today website• http://www.alaskachd.org/toolkit/index.html

• Self-determination toolkit• WSECU – Vault program• http://www.handsonbanking.org/• http://www.fcrr.org/

• Florida Center for Reading Research• http://www.k12.wa.us/assessment/WASL/SocialStudies/

default.aspx• OSPI reading assessment – 4 week summer school course.

Page 48: David Tudor OSPI Special Education Program Supervisor – Learning Improvement, Institutional Education Mini-Conference March 20, 2008.

For further information, please contact:

David [email protected](360)725-6075