David Luebke 1 9/7/2015 CS 332: Algorithms NP Complete: The Exciting Conclusion Review For Final.

David Luebke 1 04/19/23

CS 332: Algorithms

NP Complete: The Exciting Conclusion

Review For Final


Administrivia

Homework 5 due now All previous homeworks available after class Undergrad TAs still needed (before finals) Final exam

Wednesday, December 13 9 AM - noon You are allowed two 8.5“ x 11“ cheat sheets

Both sides okay Mechanical reproduction okay (sans microfiche)


Homework 5

Optimal substructure: Given an optimal subset A of items, if remove item j,

remaining subset A’ = A-{j} is optimal solution to knapsack problem (S’ = S-{j}, W’ = W - wj)

Key insight is figuring out a formula for c[i,w], value of soln for items 1..i and max weight w:

Time: O(nW)

i

i

ii wwi

ww

wi

wicwwicv

wicwic

and 0 if

if

0or 0 if

],1[,,1[max(

],1[

0

],[


Review: P and NP

What do we mean when we say a problem is in P?

What do we mean when we say a problem is in NP?

What is the relation between P and NP?


Review: P and NP

What do we mean when we say a problem is in P? A: A solution can be found in polynomial time

What do we mean when we say a problem is in NP? A: A solution can be verified in polynomial time

What is the relation between P and NP? A: P NP, but no one knows whether P = NP


Review: NP-Complete

What, intuitively, does it mean if we can reduce problem P to problem Q?

How do we reduce P to Q? What does it mean if Q is NP-Hard? What does it mean if Q is NP-Complete?


Review: NP-Complete

What, intuitively, does it mean if we can reduce problem P to problem Q? P is “no harder than” Q

How do we reduce P to Q? Transform instances of P to instances of Q in polynomial time

s.t. Q: “yes” iff P: “yes” What does it mean if Q is NP-Hard?

Every problem PNP p Q

What does it mean if Q is NP-Complete? Q is NP-Hard and Q NP


Review: Proving Problems NP-Complete

What was the first problem shown to be NP-Complete?

A: Boolean satisfiability (SAT), by Cook How do we usually prove that a problem R

is NP-Complete? A: Show R NP, and reduce a known

NP-Complete problem Q to R


Review: Directed Undirected Ham. Cycle Given: directed hamiltonian cycle is

NP-Complete (draw the example) Transform graph G = (V, E) into G’ = (V’,

E’): Every vertex v in V transforms into 3 vertices

v1, v2, v3 in V’ with edges (v1,v2) and (v2,v3) in E’ Every directed edge (v, w) in E transforms into the

undirected edge (v3, w1) in E’ (draw it)


Review:Directed Undirected Ham. Cycle Prove the transformation correct:

If G has directed hamiltonian cycle, G’ will have undirected cycle (straightforward)

If G’ has an undirected hamiltonian cycle, G will have a directed hamiltonian cycle

The three vertices that correspond to a vertex v in G must be traversed in order v1, v2, v3 or v3, v2, v1, since v2 cannot be reached from any other vertex in G’

Since 1’s are connected to 3’s, the order is the same for all triples. Assume w.l.o.g. order is v1, v2, v3.

Then G has a corresponding directed hamiltonian cycle


Review: Hamiltonian Cycle TSP

The well-known traveling salesman problem: Complete graph with cost c(i,j) from city i to city j a simple cycle over cities with cost < k ?

How can we prove the TSP is NP-Complete? A: Prove TSP NP; reduce the undirected

hamiltonian cycle problem to TSP TSP NP: straightforward Reduction: need to show that if we can solve TSP we

can solve ham. cycle problem


Review: Hamiltonian Cycle TSP

To transform ham. cycle problem on graph G = (V,E) to TSP, create graph G’ = (V,E’): G’ is a complete graph Edges in E’ also in E have weight 0 All other edges in E’ have weight 1 TSP: is there a TSP on G’ with weight 0?

If G has a hamiltonian cycle, G’ has a cycle w/ weight 0 If G’ has cycle w/ weight 0, every edge of that cycle has

weight 0 and is thus in G. Thus G has a ham. cycle


Review: Conjunctive Normal Form

3-CNF is a useful NP-Complete problem: Literal: an occurrence of a Boolean or its negation A Boolean formula is in conjunctive normal form,

or CNF, if it is an AND of clauses, each of which is an OR of literals

Ex: (x1 x2) (x1 x3 x4) (x5)

3-CNF: each clause has exactly 3 distinct literals Ex: (x1 x2 x3) (x1 x3 x4) (x5 x3 x4) Notice: true if at least one literal in each clause is true


3-CNF Clique

What is a clique of a graph G? A: a subset of vertices fully connected to each

other, i.e. a complete subgraph of G The clique problem: how large is the

maximum-size clique in a graph? Can we turn this into a decision problem? A: Yes, we call this the k-clique problem Is the k-clique problem within NP?


3-CNF Clique

What should the reduction do? A: Transform a 3-CNF formula to a graph, for

which a k-clique will exist (for some k) iff the 3-CNF formula is satisfiable


3-CNF Clique

The reduction: Let B = C1 C2 … Ck be a 3-CNF formula with k

clauses, each of which has 3 distinct literals For each clause put a triple of vertices in the graph, one

for each literal Put an edge between two vertices if they are in different

triples and their literals are consistent, meaning not each other’s negation

Run an example: B = (x y z) (x y z ) (x y z )


3-CNF Clique

Prove the reduction works: If B has a satisfying assignment, then each clause

has at least one literal (vertex) that evaluates to 1 Picking one such “true” literal from each clause

gives a set V’ of k vertices. V’ is a clique (Why?) If G has a clique V’ of size k, it must contain one

vertex in each clique (Why?) We can assign 1 to each literal corresponding with

a vertex in V’, without fear of contradiction


Clique Vertex Cover

A vertex cover for a graph G is a set of vertices incident to every edge in G

The vertex cover problem: what is the minimum size vertex cover in G?

Restated as a decision problem: does a vertex cover of size k exist in G?

Thm 36.12: vertex cover is NP-Complete


Clique Vertex Cover

First, show vertex cover in NP (How?) Next, reduce k-clique to vertex cover

The complement GC of a graph G contains exactly those edges not in G

Compute GC in polynomial time

G has a clique of size k iff GC has a vertex cover of size |V| - k


Clique Vertex Cover

Claim: If G has a clique of size k, GC has a vertex cover of size |V| - k Let V’ be the k-clique Then V - V’ is a vertex cover in GC

Let (u,v) be any edge in GC

Then u and v cannot both be in V’ (Why?) Thus at least one of u or v is in V-V’ (why?), so

edge (u, v) is covered by V-V’ Since true for any edge in GC, V-V’ is a vertex cover


Clique Vertex Cover

Claim: If GC has a vertex cover V’ V, with |V’| = |V| - k, then G has a clique of size k For all u,v V, if (u,v) GC then u V’ or

v V’ or both (Why?) Contrapositive: if u V’ and v V’, then

(u,v) E In other words, all vertices in V-V’ are connected

by an edge, thus V-V’ is a clique Since |V| - |V’| = k, the size of the clique is k


General Comments

Literally hundreds of problems have been shown to be NP-Complete

Some reductions are profound, some are comparatively easy, many are easy once the key insight is given

You can expect a simple NP-Completeness proof on the final


Other NP-Complete Problems

Subset-sum: Given a set of integers, does there exist a subset that adds up to some target T?

0-1 knapsack: you know this one Hamiltonian path: Obvious Graph coloring: can a given graph be colored

with k colors such that no adjacent vertices are the same color?

Etc…


Final Exam

Coverage: 60% stuff since midterm, 40% stuff before midterm

Goal: doable in 2 hours This review just covers material since the

midterm review


Final Exam: Study Tips

Study tips: Study each lecture since the midterm Study the homework and homework solutions Study the midterm

Re-make your midterm cheat sheet I recommend handwriting or typing it Think about what you should have had on it the first

time…cheat sheet is about identifying important concepts


Graph Representation

Adjacency list Adjacency matrix Tradeoffs:

What makes a graph dense? What makes a graph sparse? What about planar graphs?


Basic Graph Algorithms

Breadth-first search What can we use BFS to calculate? A: shortest-path distance to source vertex

Depth-first search Tree edges, back edges, cross and forward edges What can we use DFS for? A: finding cycles, topological sort


Topological Sort, MST

Topological sort Examples: getting dressed, project dependency What kind of graph do we do topological sort on?

Minimum spanning tree Optimal substructure Min edge theorem (enables greedy approach)


MST Algorithms

Prim’s algorithm What is the bottleneck in Prim’s algorithm? A: priority queue operations

Kruskal’s algorithm What is the bottleneck in Kruskal’s algorithm? Answer: depends on disjoint-set implementation

As covered in class, disjoint-set union operations As described in book, sorting the edges


Single-Source Shortest Path

Optimal substructure Key idea: relaxation of edges What does the Bellman-Ford algorithm do?

What is the running time? What does Dijkstra’s algorithm do?

What is the running time? When does Dijkstra’s algorithm not apply?


Disjoint-Set Union

We talked about representing sets as linked lists, every element stores pointer to list head

What is the cost of merging sets A and B? A: O(max(|A|, |B|))

What is the maximum cost of merging n 1-element sets into a single n-element set? A: O(n2)

How did we improve this? By how much? A: always copy smaller into larger: O(n lg n)


Amortized Analysis

Idea: worst-case cost of an operation may overestimate its cost over course of algorithm

Goal: get a tighter amortized bound on its cost Aggregate method: total cost of operation over course

of algorithm divided by # operations Example: disjoint-set union

Accounting method: “charge” a cost to each operation, accumulate unused cost in bank, never go negative

Example: dynamically-doubling arrays


Dynamic Programming

Indications: optimal substructure, repeated subproblems

What is the difference between memoization and dynamic programming?

A: same basic idea, but: Memoization: recursive algorithm, looking up

subproblem solutions after computing once Dynamic programming: build table of subproblem

solutions bottom-up


LCS Via Dynamic Programming

Longest common subsequence (LCS) problem: Given two sequences x[1..m] and y[1..n], find the

longest subsequence which occurs in both Brute-force algorithm: 2m subsequences of x to

check against n elements of y: O(n 2m) Define c[i,j] = length of LCS of x[1..i], y[1..j] Theorem:

otherwise]),1[],1,[max(

],[][ if1]1,1[],[

jicjic

jyixjicjic


Greedy Algorithms

Indicators: Optimal substructure Greedy choice property: a locally optimal choice leads to

a globally optimal solution Example problems:

Activity selection: Set of activities, with start and end times. Maximize compatible set of activities.

Fractional knapsack: sort items by $/lb, then take items in sorted order

MST


The End

David Luebke 1 9/7/2015 CS 332: Algorithms NP Complete: The Exciting Conclusion Review For Final.

Documents

problem p np p q

q np slide

vertex v

v transforms

known npcomplete problem

npcomplete draw

algorithms np complete

problems npcomplete