[email protected]www.fitting-in.com [email protected]Stopping the drip Looking for new ways to stop the harassment of women firefighters Dr. Dave Baigent GradIFireE, BA Hons, Phd [email protected]To hear the recorded version go to www.fitting-in.com/melbourne/drip.WAV www.fitting-in.com
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Ongoing research on the how firefighters develop and protect their (masculine)
identity
Background– One more last working class hero
(www.fitting-in.com/baigent.pdf)
– Research of a (largely) unreconstructed masculinity (represents a patriarchy at work Walby 1986, 1990)
– Developing an understanding of a source of hegemonic masculinity (Connell 1987, 1995, 2005)
– Qualitative research using to produce findings that firefighters might understand (Grounded Theory Glaser and Strauss 1965Pro-feminist auto critique (Hearn 1994)
What does the 2006 data say in reply to the question about harassment?
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Yes119 52.4 53.4
53.4
No99 43.6 44.4
97.8
Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place
5 2.2 2.2100.0
Total 223 98.2 100.0
Missing System 4 1.8
Total 227 100.0
119 (53.4%) of the respondents replied “Yes” 99 (44.4%) replied “No.” Five women fell into the fell into the group whose qualitative response were recorded as “Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place.”
When asked “During first year did harassment occur: frequently, occasionally, never?”
26.6% (50) of women answered “Frequently,” 25.5% (61) of women answered “Occasionally” 39.9% (75) of women answered “Never.” Two women firefighters fell into the group whose qualitative response were recorded as “Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place.”
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Frequently50 22.0 26.6
26.6
Occasionally61 26.9 32.4
59.0
Never75 33.0 39.9
98.9
Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place
AnalysisEducationProvides the tools for men to avoid being caughtThreat Increases secrecy -Drives harassment further undergroundIncreases group solidarityCulture identifies the harasser as victimWomen afraid to speak out because of backlash
– Principal Manager • challenged the culture just be being there• marginalised by other principal managers throughout the fire service• held her ground – worn down - took out a sexual harassment action• weakened - settled out of court (including a silencing agreement)
– Watch manager• successful career• promoted and not accepted by peers• looked for help – unsupported by managers – took out sexual harassment
action • weakened - settled out of court (including a silencing agreement)
– Firefighter• treated badly • stood up against the men - worn down • weakened – took out sexual harassment action – settled out of court
(including a silencing agreement)– Student
• harassed whilst on work-placement • kept secret • spoke out after she left – will not now join the fire and rescue service
First caught in the headlights– Woman able to recognise what was happening– Believing once men accepted them it would get better– Some women just accept this situation
Some still caught in headlights– Wanting justice– Doubting sanity– Psychologically unable to continue
Could have been solved– If the group had chosen this behaviour could have
Defend the victim Until the point when they take legal action
Then – Caught in headlights managers are transfixed by the need to
protect the organisation– The perpetrator may be to blame but with a court case looming
until the organisation can buy her silence they must act against the women
– After buying the women’s silence there is no evidence against the perpetrator
Result– Little or no recognition of the problem– Avoiding or not even looking for the truth– Little or no attempt to take the moral high ground– Women learn the lesson that if they complain they will loose their
Firefighters attending to their needs(Defending their identity and hegemony)
Firefighters believe they need to fit-in with each other to maintain the cohesive team
Watch develops a collective memory and in some ways this makes each watch unique
This collective memory (tradition) is protected by each cohort of firefighters for the next generation
Handed down through homosociality – protected by bullying and harassment
The individual fulfils their needs through the group (watch) they work with
The watch (their work) becomes their way of understanding the world
The individual in the fire service (through their informal culture) may be attending to all five needs (Maslow 1987); including the potential to believe they self-actualise
Looking for a way of turning this situation around
Something that – Employers can gain from– Helps the individual victim– Helps the individual harasser– Leaves the team intact– Does not stop fitting-in– Does not remove the healthy and antagonistic
relations that exist– Something that breaks the circle of violence –
Senior Managers must recognise what is happeningUnderstand the complicated cultural arrangementsRecognise you cannot warm up the whole seaConcentrate resources on one areaJunior managers must be trained to intervene
Informally Spartacus momentSomeone must speak out to stop the drip
Every Social group must … secure for its individual and group membership:The satisfaction of material and economic needs.The maintenance of spontaneous co-operation throughout the organization(Mayo 1949)The apprentice learned to be a good workman, and he also learned to ‘get on
with’ his fellows(Mayo 1949)(See also Baigent 2006 Mayo)Whilst Mayo provides considerable insight to the power of the group and this
insight can be operationalized from research in the fire service, what has yet to be explored alongside Mayo’s understanding of how powerful the group can be, is that the group does not want to change.
Leader at ground level (operational) may defer to maintaining group cohesion over and above everything else.