Top Banner
Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting 5 Feb 08
13

Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Simone Pennock
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation

variable in the Far Detector(Working Title)

Part 2

Philip RodriguesOxford MINOS Group Meeting

5 Feb 08

Page 2: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

2

Low/High variable

• Rationale: muon tracks small variation between planes, non-muon tracks larger variation

• Construction:1. Exclude first 30% of track planes (to veto shower)2. Find window around reco’d track: ±4 strips, ±40ns3. Take all strips in this window (track and non-track)4. Sort these strips by PH5. Find mean PH of lower half, mean PH of upper half6. Low/High = mean of lower half / mean of upper half

Page 3: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

3

Outline

• ND Low/High problem fairly well studied• FD still uncertain

– Various ad hoc cuts help– Crosstalk looks promising

• This week:– Is it track modelling or detector modelling?

Page 4: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

4

Crosstalk

• Fixes up low/high distribution• Doesn’t fix up everything else

• Not conclusive:– model is more

complicated than the one param I changed!

Page 5: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

5

A suggestive distribution

• Additional small hits are at ±1-2 strips from track

• Diagonal xtalk can jump 1 strip• But so can physics

Page 6: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

6

A mini mystery

• Excess of tiny (<0.6 pe) hits in data

• Looks like crosstalk

Page 7: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

7

(De)Muxing

Tubes 0,2 Tube 1

Page 8: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

8

Crosstalk vs Physics

• Muxing pattern helps:• Simplistic way: P(hit on pixel i | hit on

pixel j )• Data/MC:

Page 9: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

9

Crosstalk vs Physics 2

• Less simplistic: P(small hit on pixel i | track hit on pixel j)

• 9/6 pair goes opposite way on different tubes!• Not very significant (see backup slides)

Page 10: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

10

More stats!• Cosmics could improve significance, but

angular dist, etc• ND PMTs, electronics different, but physics

should still show…

No ±1 strip excess!NN xtalk/afterpulsing

(Normalized to #events)

Page 11: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

11

Tentative conclusion

• Extra hits at ±1 strip consistent with crosstalk– But low stats crosstalk map seems to disagree

• ND shows no extra hits at ±1 strip– Not physics

• Believe the ND over my ad hoc crosstalk map:– Effect is not physics

Page 12: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

12

Backup

• Pull plots for small given track

Page 13: Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.

13

Backup 2

• Pull plots for any given any