DATA REPORT FOR THE COLLECTION OF SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK FROM THE FLOODPLAIN OF THE HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK IN YEAR 2001, ANALYSIS OF FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS FROM THE YEAR 2000, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS FROM THE YEAR 2000 HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT HUDSON R IVER NATURAL R ESOURCE TRUSTEES STATE OF NEW YORK U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FINAL JANUARY 2010 Available from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hudson River NRDA, Lead Administrative Trustee Damage Assessment Center, N/ORR31 1305 East-West Highway, Rm 10219 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3281
346
Embed
Data Report for the Collection of Small Mammals and ... · hudson river hudson river data report: small mammals and american woodcock collection, analysis of floodplain earthworms,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DATA REPORT FOR THE COLLECTION OFSMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK
FROM THE FLOODPLAIN OF THE HUDSON RIVER,NEW YORK IN YEAR 2001,
ANALYSIS OF FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMSFROM THE YEAR 2000, AND
RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILSAND SMALL MAMMALS FROM THE YEAR 2000
HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCEDAMAGE ASSESSMENT
HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
STATE OF NEW YORK
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FINAL
JANUARY 2010
Available from:U.S. Department of CommerceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationHudson River NRDA, Lead Administrative TrusteeDamage Assessment Center, N/ORR311305 East-West Highway, Rm 10219Silver Spring, MD 20910-3281
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Natural resources of the Hudson River have been contaminated through past and ongoing discharges ofpolychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees -- New York State, theU.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of the Interior -- are conducting a naturalresource damage assessment (NRDA) to assess and restore those natural resources injured by PCBs.
In 2000, the Trustees conducted a screening-level investigation from Fort Edward to Stillwater, New York,and identified PCB contamination in floodplain soils and in small mammals. The Trustees expanded thisinvestigation in 2001 to refine the areas and species that may be exposed to floodplain PCBs.
Sampling in 2001 focused on small mammals and American woodcock (Scolopax minor). A total of 169small mammal samples from the year 2001, consisting of 61 short-tailed shrews, 94 deer mice and white-footed mice, and 14 voles, as well as two woodcock liver samples, were analyzed for select PCB congeners,PCB homologue groups, total PCBs, and percent lipids.
The Trustees also determined that it was appropriate to re-analyze select shrew and soil samples from 2000pursuant to the methods contained in the Trustees Analytical Quality Assurance Plan, and to analyzearchived earthworm samples from 2000 that had not been analyzed previously. Thus, in addition to thesmall mammal and woodcock liver samples collected in 2001 that were submitted for analysis, the Trusteesalso submitted to the laboratory for re-analysis 18 soil samples and 12 shrew samples from 2000 andsubmitted to the laboratory for analysis 10 earthworm composite samples from 2000.
The total PCB analytical results from this investigation are as follows:• Total PCB concentrations in earthworm samples from 2000 range from 0.03 ppm to 23.9 ppm (wet
weight basis (ww)).• Total PCB concentrations in soil samples from 2000 range from 0.11 ppm to 937 ppm (dry weight
basis).• Total PCB concentrations in shrew samples from 2000 range from 0.19 ppm to 36.7 ppm (ww).• Total PCB concentrations in small mammal samples from 2001 range from 0.02 ppm to 30.4 ppm
(ww).• Total PCB concentrations in woodcock liver samples from 2001 are 0.12 ppm and 0.13 ppm (ww).
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
Past and continuing discharges of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have contaminated the naturalresources of the Hudson River. The Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees (Trustees) -- NewYork State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of the Interior -- areconducting a natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) to assess and restore those naturalresources injured by PCBs (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002a). In 2000, the Trusteesconducted a screening-level investigation from Fort Edward to Stillwater, New York, and identifiedPCB contamination in floodplain soils and in small mammals. Data collected during that investigationindicate that PCB concentrations in floodplain soils in the 20 miles downstream of Fort Edwardranged from undetected to 360 parts per million (ppm) (SEA Consultants 2002).
The Hudson River floodplain provides habitat for a wide range of wildlife, including amphibians,reptiles, birds, and mammals. These organisms often are important parts of the diet for predatorssuch as mink, eagles, falcons, and owls. If floodplain soils contain PCBs, they may provide a PCBsource for floodplain biota. The floodplain may become contaminated when heavy rains andsnowmelt cause the Hudson River to overtop its banks. These flood waters bring with themcontaminated sediment that has been churned up from the river's bed. Eventually, the flood waterssubside and deposit this material on the floodplain. Typically sediment is deposited in any area wherecurrent flow is reduced in low-lying floodplain areas, by ponding, or by the presence of vegetation.Since these floodplains provide habitat for a number of species, the Trustees are working to betterunderstand to what extent floodplain PCBs should be assessed in the damage assessment.
In 2001 the Trustees expanded their floodplain investigation to refine the areas and species that maybe exposed to floodplain PCBs. This Data Report provides the results of that preliminaryinvestigation of PCB contamination of floodplain biota conducted in the year 2001 and provides theresults of further analyses of floodplain soils, earthworms, and small mammals collected from theHudson River floodplain in the year 2000. The Report documents methods, quality assurance/quality control, and data from an investigation of PCB contamination of floodplain biota conductedpursuant to the NRDA in the year 2001, analysis of earthworm samples collected in 2000, and re-analyses of select floodplain soils and small mammals collected from the Hudson River floodplain inthe year 2000. Based on the results of this preliminary investigation and other available information,the Trustees will determine whether the floodplain should be considered for a more comprehensiveassessment.
2.0 SAMPLING AND ANAL2.0 SAMPLING AND ANAL2.0 SAMPLING AND ANAL2.0 SAMPLING AND ANAL2.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSISYSISYSISYSISYSIS
The Trustees' "Work Summary for the Collection of Small Mammals and American Woodcock fromthe Floodplains of the Hudson River, New York" (Appendix A) (Hudson River Natural ResourceTrustees 2004a) documents the year 2001 collection and processing of small mammals and Americanwoodcock (Scolopax minor) from the Hudson River floodplain.
Figure 1 shows the floodplain Study Areas from the 2000 and 2001 investigations. Table 1 ofAppendix A provides a list and description of the sample sites used in the 2000 and 2001 floodplaininvestigations, and the types of samples collected from each Study Area.
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
2
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
2.1.1 COLLECTION OF SMALL MAMMAL SAMPLES IN 2001
Small mammal collection using snap traps began on September 4, 2001, and concluded on October 18,2001. The collection focused on 12 sites from the 2000 investigation and 11 new sites (designated StudyAreas 13 through 23) for 2001. The new sites were located downstream of the sites from the year 2000investigation and extended from the Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park in Stillwater, New York toPoughkeepsie, New York. Small mammals were collected from 11 of the sites from the 2000 study andfrom 9 of the new sites. Field sampling staff were unable to collect small mammal samples from three ofthe sites (one site from 2000 (Study Area 9) and two sites from 2001 (Study Areas 14 and 19)). Eachsample was placed individually into a chemically clean glass jar. A total of 418 mammals were collectedfrom the Hudson River floodplain study areas in 2001. Table 2 of Appendix A provides a breakdown bystudy area and species of small mammals collected in 2001.
2.1.2 COLLECTION OF WOODCOCK SAMPLES IN 2001
The collection of American woodcock took place on September 27, 2001, using traditional hunting methods(a shotgun and dog). Two American woodcock were collected in the floodplain of the Hudson River inWashington County near Study Area 13. The liver was dissected out of each bird, using new single-usedisposable instruments, and each liver was placed into a chemically clean glass jar.
2.1.3 STORAGE OF SMALL MAMMAL AND WOODCOCK SAMPLES FROM 2001
The samples collected were entered on numbered Chain-of-Custody (COC) forms (see Appendix A) andplaced into the secure walk-in freezer at the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC) Hale Creek Field Station in a sealed box for storage at -20 degrees Celsius. The samples werestored at -20 degrees Celsius until shipment to the program analytical laboratory for chemical analysis.
2.1.4 SHIPPING OF SAMPLES
On July 25, 2002, selected small mammal samples (total of 169 samples consisting of 61 short-tailed shrews,94 deer mice and white-footed mice, and 14 voles) and the two woodcock liver samples were delivered tothe program analytical laboratory for analysis. The small mammal samples were selected for analysis basedon consistency with genus and species of animals previously collected and analyzed in 2000, and consideringfor which species sufficient numbers had been captured at various study areas, based on anticipatedsubsequent compositing of animals at the program analytical laboratory.
COC forms were prepared with the appropriate signatures as the small mammal and woodcock liversamples were transferred from the Hale Creek Field Station by NYSDEC staff to the program analyticallaboratory. Strict COC was maintained to preserve sample integrity.
Samples not shipped to the analytical laboratory (two woodcock carcasses and 249 small mammal samples)have been retained in the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station freezer in storage at -20 degrees Celsius.
Chemical analyses were conducted pursuant to the Trustees' Analytical Quality Assurance Plan (HudsonRiver Natural Resource Trustees 2002b).
A total of 61 shrews and 108 mice/voles from 2001 were submitted for analysis. Shrews were analyzedas individuals. Mice were composited into 18 composites of five animals and one composite of fouranimals. Voles were composited into two composites of five animals each and one composite of fouranimals. The total number of shrews and composites analyzed was 83, grouped into six analytical batchesby the laboratory. Two woodcock liver samples from 2001 were also submitted for analysis.
The Trustees also determined that it was appropriate to re-analyze select shrew and soil samples from 2000pursuant to the methods contained in the Trustees Analytical Quality Assurance Plan, and to analyzearchived earthworm samples from 2000 that had not been analyzed previously.
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
3
In 2000, the soil samples had been analyzed for total PCBs, and the shrew samples had beenanalyzed for total PCBs using a modified SW846 EPA Method 8082 (USEPA 1996) in which PCBswere quantified as Aroclors. By comparison, the Trustee's Analytical Quality Assurance Plan specifiesa total homologue method of quantifying PCBs using Low Resolution Mass Spectroscopy.Concentrations of specific individual PCB congeners are determined, the total concentration of eachhomologue group is determined, and the homologue groups are summed for a Total PCB value.
Thus, in addition to the small mammal and woodcock liver samples collected in 2001 that weresubmitted for analysis, the Trustees also submitted to the laboratory for re-analysis 18 soil samplesand 12 shrew samples from 2000 and submitted to the laboratory for analysis 10 earthwormcomposite samples. The soil, shrew and earthworm samples from 2000 were collected pursuant tothe Sampling and Analysis Plan for the 2000 investigation (SEA Consultants, Inc. 2000).
Samples collected in 2000 had been previously analyzed by a screening technique then stored frozenat -20 degrees Celsius until re-analysis in 2003 for this study.
The soils and shrew analyses from 2000 were each reported in a separate analytical batch, and willbe referred to as the '2000 analyses' to differentiate from the small mammals collected in 2001. Thewoodcock livers from 2001 and the earthworm composites from 2000 were analyzed in onelaboratory analytical batch.
The small mammal samples from 2001 and 2000, the woodcock livers, and the earthworm compositesamples were analyzed for select PCB congeners (see Table 3), PCB homologues, total PCBs (as sumof homologues) and percent lipids. Floodplain soil samples from 2000 were analyzed for select PCBcongeners (see Table 3), PCB homologues, total PCBs (as sum of homologues), and water content(%). The samples were prepped, extracted, and analyzed using laboratory SOPs approved by theTrustees prior to sample receipt.
Sample analysis began on August 18, 2003, and concluded on November 19, 2003.
Data validation was based on the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) criteria documented inthe Trustees' Analytical Quality Assurance Plan (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002b),U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999), and the following laboratory SOPs:
Sample results and related QC data were received in both an electronic and hard copy format.Electronic data were verified against the hard copy data package. The 2001 small mammal data, thewoodcock liver tissue data, and the earthworm data all received a full validation. The 2000 soil andshrew analyses received a summary validation.
The following QC elements were reviewed for data packages undergoing summary validation:• Analytical holding times• COC and sample handling
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
4
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS • GC/MS tune verification (from summary forms)
• Method blank contamination (from summary forms)• Initial and continuing calibration (from summary forms)• Rinsate blank contamination (from sample results summaries)• Analytical accuracy: surrogates, matrix spike samples, laboratory control samples, and standard
reference material results (from summary forms)• Analytical precision: laboratory duplicate samples (from summary forms)• Internal standard areas (from summary forms)• Reported detection limits (from sample result summaries)
Full validation included review of all the items listed above for summary validation, plus the followingQC elements:
• Compound identification (from raw data)• Compound quantitation, transcription and calculation checks performed at a frequency of
10% from raw data. If an error was noted, 100% of the calculations and transcriptions forthat data set were verified.
Laboratory QC samples were used to assess the effectiveness of homogenization procedures and toevaluate laboratory-derived contamination, laboratory performance, and sample matrix effects.Quality control samples included: equipment rinsate blanks, method blanks, laboratory controlsamples (LCS), matrix spike (MS) samples, laboratory duplicate samples, and standard referencematerial (SRM) analyses. Surrogates were added to each sample analyzed for PCB congeners tofurther assess the effects of sample matrix on accuracy.
Data were qualified when associated QC sample results were outside the QC limits. The followingdefinitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data validationprocess:
J Estimated: The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. The analyte was detected,but the reported value may not be accurate or precise. The "J" qualification indicates the datafell outside the QC limits, but the exceedance was not sufficient to cause rejection of the data.
UJ Estimated/Not detected: An analysis was performed for the compound or analyte, but it wasnot detected and the sample quantitation or detection limit may be inaccurate or imprecise. Theassociated numerical result is the detection limit.
NJ Tentatively Identified/Estimated: The analyte was tentatively identified and the associatednumerical value is an estimated quantity.
R Rejected: Unreliable result. Data should not be used.
An SRM sample was extracted and analyzed with each analytical batch. The SRM selected for thesmall mammal tissues (including the 2000 shrew analyses), the earthworm tissue and the woodcockliver tissue was 1974b, Organics in Mussel Tissue. This SRM has certified values for 27 of the targetPCB congeners.
The data package submitted by the laboratory was reviewed to determine whether the analytical dataquality objectives (ADQO) specified in Tables 6.1a - 6.1c in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan(Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002b) were met.
Appendices B and C contain the Data Quality Assessment Reports (Hudson River Natural ResourceTrustees 2004b and 2004c) for the samples. Tables in those reports summarize the SRM results forthis preliminary investigation.
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
5
Table 1.1 of the Trustees' Analytical Quality Assurance Plan (Hudson River Natural ResourceTrustees, 2002b) specifies the target Method Detection Limits (MDLs) for PCB congeners,homologues and total PCBs. For tissue, such as earthworm tissue composites, the target MDLs are0.1 ng/g ww (equivalent to 0.1 ppb ww) for individual congeners, and 10 ng/g (equivalent to 10 ppb)for PCB homologues and total PCBs. Actual MDLs for each PCB analyte were established by theanalytical laboratory as specified in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan. Actual MDLs are reportedon the Data Sheets (Appendices D, E, and F) in the "Detection Limit" column.
For the 2001 small mammal analyses, one data point was rejected out of 4980 results reported by thelaboratory (83 samples, each with 47 congeners, 10 homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids andpercent moisture). The completeness level attained for the analysis of the field samples is greaterthan 99.99%. A total of 128 out of 4980 results (2.57%) were estimated because of laboratoryaccuracy and precision outliers. One data point was rejected based on an accuracy outlier. Therejected data point should not be used for any purpose. For all other data, the overall quality of thedata is acceptable and all results, as qualified, are considered usable.
For the 2000 shrew and soil samples, one data point was rejected out of 1770 results reported by thelaboratory (30 samples, each with 47 congeners, 10 homologue groups, and total PCBs; percent lipidsfor the 12 shrew samples; and percent moisture for the 18 soils). The completeness level attained forthe analysis of the 2000 samples is greater than 99.94%. A total of 333 out of 1770 results (18.8%)were estimated because of laboratory accuracy and precision outliers. One data point was rejectedbased on an accuracy outlier. The rejected data point should not be used for any purpose. For allother data, the overall quality of the data is acceptable and all results, as qualified, are consideredusable.
For the earthworm composites and woodcock liver tissue, out of 720 results reported by thelaboratory (12 samples each with 47 congeners, ten homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids andpercent moisture), a total of eight (1.1%) data points were qualified as estimated (J) because oflaboratory accuracy and precision outliers and one data point was rejected (R) due to a %R outlier.The completeness level attained for the analysis of the samples is greater than 99.8%. The rejecteddata point should not be used for any purpose. For all other data, the overall quality of the data isacceptable and the results, as qualified, are considered usable.
The Earthworm (2000) and Woodcock Liver (2001) Tissue Data Sheets (Appendix D), the SmallMammal (2001) Tissue Data Sheets (Appendix E) and the Soil and Shrew (2000) Data Sheets(Appendix F) provide the results of the analyses.
These Data Sheets contain information that has been extracted from the Trustees' Earthworm andWoodcock Liver Tissue Database (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2004d) and the Trustees'2001 Small Mammal Tissue and 2000 Shrew and Soil Database (Hudson River Natural ResourceTrustees 2004e). Those complete databases and the accompanying Database User Manuals (HudsonRiver Natural Resource Trustees 2004f and 2004g) are not included in this report due to the size ofthe database, but will be made available upon request.
The Data Sheets contain the following fields:
Sampling Date - Sampling Date (mm/dd/yy format).
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
6
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
Field ID -
For the Earthworm and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Sheets, the field IDs were created using thefollowing format:
AAA-SSS
where AAA is an abbreviation to indicate the animal type (EW for earthworm composite, HWR forwoodcock liver tissue) and SSS is the site number where the animals were collected (two digits forearthworms, three digits for woodcocks). For example, EW-01 indicates a composite of earthwormscollected at Site 1, and HWR-001 indicates a woodcock liver from an animal collected at Site 1.
For the 2001 Small Mammals, the field IDs were created using the following format:
SS-NN-DDDDDD
where SS is the code for the site number (only one digit if the site number is less than 10), NN is thenumerical record of animals collected (e.g., "05" indicates the fifth animal collected) and DDDDDD is thecollection date (in a MMDDYY format). For example, 10-07-100401 indicates the seventh animal collectedat Site 10, taken October 4, 2001.
Some of the animals were composited prior to analysis. For composite samples, the following field IDformat was used:
Comp of Sta SS
where SS is the code for the site number (only one digit if the site number is less than 10). For example, acomposite of animals from Site 13 would be: Comp of Sta 13.
Two composites were created for Sites 12 and 20, one composite of mice and one composite of voles.These are differentiated as follows:
Comp of Sta 12 (mouse) or Comp of Sta 12 (vole)
with similar entries for the Site 20 composites.
For the 2000 shrews, the field IDs for the shrews collected in 2000 are similar to the field IDs for thesmall mammals collected in 2001, with a few additions:
S-NN-DDDDDD-MM-T-AAA
where SS, NN, and DDDDDD are the same as above. MM indicates the distance (in meters) from thetransect line through the site. T indicates the trapping method (always 'S' for snap trap for this data set),and AAA is the abbreviation for the animal type (always 'STS' for 'short-tailed shrew' for this data set). Forexample, 01-01-091000-10-S-STS indicates the first short-tailed shrew collected at Site 1, taken Sept 10,2000. The animal was collected using a snap trap, and was captured 10 meters from the transect throughSite 1.
For the 2000 soils, the field IDs for the soils use the following format:
SS-N-D-CM
where SS is the site number, N is the transect number (always '1' for this data set), D is a letter code whichindicates the sequence from the water's edge (A is closest to the water, B is further away, etc.), and CMindicates the deepest depth (in centimeters) of the soil core section.
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
7
For example, 1-1-A15 indicates that the soil sample was collected at Site 1, at the sampling point(along the transect) closest to the river, and that the sample includes all of the soil from 0 cm to 15cm in depth. Sample 7-1-F25 would be a soil from Site 7, at the sixth sampling point away from theriver along the transect, and includes the soil from 15 cm to 25 cm in depth.
Laboratory ID - Laboratory IDs were created using the following format:
Sample delivery group B run sequence number (e.g., 0208031-01).
Analyte - For the PCB congeners, the analyte names are reported using the following format:
Clx-BZ#NNN
where Clx refers to the chlorination level, BZ# refers to the Ballschmiter and Zell (1994) number,and NNN is the congener number. For example, PCB 110 (a pentachlorinated biphenyl) is reportedas Cl5-BZ#110.
Value, Interpretive Qualifier and Units -
Value - Analytical result (3 significant figures).
Interpretive Qualifier - This field contains qualifiers applied to each data point by thelaboratory and after the data validation process. The qualifiers are defined as follows:
U Analyte was not detected. The associated value represents the detection limit
J Estimated: The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. The analyte was detected,but the reported value may not be accurate or precise. The "J" qualification indicates the datafell outside the QC limits, but the exceedance was not sufficient to cause rejection of the data,OR that the reported result is with a range of elevated analytical uncertainty (greater than theMethod Detection Limit (MDL) value, but less than the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL)value).
UJ Estimated/Not detected: An analysis was performed for the compound or analyte, but it wasnot detected and the sample quantitation or detection limit may be inaccurate or imprecise.The associated numerical result is the detection limit.
NJ The analyte was tentatively identified and the associated numerical value is an estimatedquantity.
D The concentration was reported from a dilution.
R Rejected: Unreliable result. Data should not be used. The values associated with R qualifiershave been removed from the databases.
Reasons for qualification are explained further in the Data Quality Assessment Reports (AppendicesB and C).
Unit - The unit of measurement of the analytical result is provided (for example, μg/kg).
Detection Limit - self-explanatory; this column includes units.
A brief description of some of the features of these data follows in sections 3.1 and 3.2 of this DataReport. Please note that the unit "μg/kg" used in the Data Sheets is equivalent to parts per billion(ppb) used in the discussion of these data in this Data Report.
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
8
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS There are additional data fields, and data collected by the Trustees, that are not reported in this Data Report
but that are contained within the Trustees' Earthworm and Woodcock Liver Tissue Database and theTrustees' 2001 Small Mammal Tissue and 2000 Shrew and Soil Database. These include, but are notlimited to, Analytical Batch, Laboratory Flag, Analytical Method, Matrix, Extraction Date, Analysis Date,Dilution Factor, and Sample Size.
For the purpose of reporting PCB results below and in the figures attached to this report, all values flaggedwith either a U or UJ qualifier (that is, not detected; see Appendices B and C) were considered to be zeroin statistical evaluations of the data. Using zero, rather than the value reported by the laboratory for theanalyte, which represents the detection limit for the analysis, potentially underreports the true value, butavoids overreporting the true value. This is thus a conservative result; the actual PCB concentration couldbe higher.
3.13.13.13.13.1 TOT TOT TOT TOT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRAAL PCB CONCENTRAAL PCB CONCENTRAAL PCB CONCENTRAAL PCB CONCENTRATIONSTIONSTIONSTIONSTIONSTotal PCB concentrations in earthworm samples from 2000 range from 0.03 ppm to 23.9 ppm (ww) (Table1 and Figure 2).Total PCB concentrations in soil samples from 2000 range from 0.11 ppm to 937 ppm (dry weight basis)(Table 2 and Figures 3 and 4).Total PCB concentrations in shrew samples from 2000 range from 0.19 ppm to 36.7 ppm (ww) (Table 3and Figure 5).Total PCB concentrations in small mammal samples from 2001 range from 0.02 ppm to 30.4 ppm (ww)(Tables 4a-c and Figures 6, 7, and 8 for mice, voles and shrews, respectively).Total PCB concentrations in woodcock liver samples from 2001 are 0.12 ppm and 0.13 ppm (ww) (Table5).
Table 1. Summary of Total PCBs (as sum of homologues, ww) in
Earthworm Composite Samples
Composite Sample PCB ConcentrationSampling Site Size (g) (ppm)
1 27 1.23
2 20 0.49
3 28 0.03
4 26 2.42
5 28 6.31
6 33 11.30
7 26 0.18
8 22 11.30
10 26 23.90
11 16 20.30
Note that for earthworms collected in 2000, only one sample composite was collected from each of thesampling sites identified in Table 1, thus no means or standard deviations are reported.
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
9
Table 2. Summary of Total PCBs (as sum of homologues, dry weight basis) in Soil Samples from 2000
Sampling n = Number of PCB Conc. Conc. Average ± 1 Std.
Site Samples Range (ppm) Dev. (ppm)
1 6 0.24 - 36.10 9.75 ± 13.45
7 6 0.11 - 139 33.04 ± 54.98
8 4 28.8 - 937 275.63 ± 441.83
10 1 - 114
11 1 - 204
Table 3. Summary of Total PCBs (as sum of homologues, ww) in Shrew Samples from 2000
Sampling n = Number of PCB Conc. Conc. Average ± 1 Std.
Site Samples Range (ppm) Dev. (ppm)
1 3 0.26 - 6.92 4.80 ± 3.94
7 4 0.79 - 36.70 11.17 ± 17.09
8 5 0.19 - 28.10 13.15 ± 10.13
Note that for soil and shrew samples, data are reported for only a subset of sites from which sampleswere collected in 2000 because, as discussed in Section 2.2, only a subset of samples from the 2000effort (as opposed to the entire sample set) were re-analyzed.
Table 4. Summary of Total PCBs (as sum of homologues, ww) in Small Mammal Samples from 2001
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
10
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS Table 4b. Meadow Vole Composite Samples
Composite Sample Size PCB Concentration
Sampling Site (g) (ppm)
2 159 0.05
12 152 0.18
20 220 0.15
Note that for mice and meadow voles collected in 2001, only one sample was collected from each of thesampling sites identified in Tables 4a and 4b; thus no means or standard deviations are reported.
Table 4c. Shrew Samples
Table 5. Summary of Total PCBs (as sum of homologues, ww) in Woodcock Liver Samples from 2001
PCB Conc. Range Conc. Average ± 1 Std.
Sampling Site n = Number of Samples (ppm) Dev. (ppm)
13 2 0.12 - 0.13 0.12 ± 7.07
3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 PCB HOMOLOGUES AND CONGENERSPCB HOMOLOGUES AND CONGENERSPCB HOMOLOGUES AND CONGENERSPCB HOMOLOGUES AND CONGENERSPCB HOMOLOGUES AND CONGENERS
PCBs are synthetic (man-made) chemicals that form a group of 209 individual compounds that have similarchemical structures based on a biphenyl core with 1 to 10 chlorine atoms attached. PCBs have the genericformula C12H(10-x)Clx, where x is an integer from 1 to 10. Each individual PCB compound, called a congener,is identified by the unique number and location of chlorine atoms that attach to the compound's basestructure. Congeners differ both in their physical properties and in their effects on fish and wildlife (Safe1994; Van den Berg et al. 1998).
Sampling Site n = Number of Samples PCB Conc. Range
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
11
For this investigation, the samples were analyzed for the specific target PCB congeners listed in Table6. In addition, a total concentration for each homologue group was determined by summing alltarget and non-target congener concentrations within each homologue group. For any congenerreported as non-detected, zero was used in the summation.
Table 6. PCB Congener Analytes
Current Ballschmiter and Zell (1994)and IUPAC Number IUPAC Name
Ballschmiter, K. and Zell M. 1994. Analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by glasscapillary gas chromatography. Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry 302:20-31.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2002a. Hudson River Natural Resource DamageAssessment Plan. September 2002. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2002b. Analytical Quality Assurance Plan for theHudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Public Release Version. July 9,2002, Version 1.0. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004a. Work Summary for the Collection of SmallMammals and American Woodcock from the Floodplains of the Hudson River, NewYork. Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Final. Public ReleaseVersion. May 27, 2004. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004b. Data Quality Assessment Report. HudsonRiver Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Floodplain Study. Woodcock Liver Tissueand Earthworm Tissue. Public Release Version. February 2, 2004. Version 1.0. U.S.Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004c. Data Quality Assessment Report. HudsonRiver Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Floodplain Study. 2001 Small MammalsTissue and 2000 Shrews and Soils. Public Release Version. February 19, 2004. Version1.1. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004d. Earthworm and Woodcock Liver TissueDatabase. Version 2.0. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004e. 2001 Small Mammal Tissue and 2000Shrew and Soil Database. Version 2.0. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring,MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004f. Database User Manual for Version 2.0.Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Floodplain Study. WoodcockLiver Tissue and Earthworm Tissue. Public Release Version. July 30, 2004. U.S.Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2004g. Database User Manual for Version 2.0.Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Floodplain Study. 2001 SmallMammals Tissue and 2001 Shrews and Soils. Public Release Version. July 30, 2004. U.S.Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Safe, S.H. 1994. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): Environmental impact, biochemical andtoxic responses, and implications for risk assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 24:87-149.
SEA Consultants, Inc. 2000. Sampling and Analysis Plan, Hudson River Floodplain, NaturalResources Damage Assessment. SEA Consultants, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. ReportPrepared for Industrial Economics, Inc. September 2000.
SEA Consultants, Inc. 2002. Hudson River Natural Resources Damage Assessment,Floodplain Soil and Biota Screening Sampling Report. SEA Consultants, Inc., Cambridge,Mass. Report Prepared for Industrial Economics, Inc. SEA Project No. 2000416.01-A.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Test Methods for Evaluating SolidWastes. SW-846. Third Edition. December.
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
14
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Washington, D.C. 20460. EPA540/R-99/008. 118 pp.
Van den Berg, M., Birnbaum, L., Bosveld, A.T.C., Brunstrom, B., Cook, P.M., Feeley, M., Giesy, J.P.,Hanberg, A., Hasegawa, R., Kennedy, S.W., Kubiak, T.J., Larsen, J.C., van Leeuwen, F.X.R., Liem,A.K.D., Nolt, C., Peterson, R.E., Poellinger, L., Safe, S., Schrenk, D., Tillitt, D.E., Tysklind, M.,Younes, M., Waern, F., and Zacharewski, T. 1998. Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) for PCBs,PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environmental Health Perspectives 106: 775-792.
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
15
FIGURESFIGURESFIGURESFIGURESFIGURES
Figure 1. Hudson River Sampling Sites.
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
16
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS Figure 2. Total PCB concentrations in earthworms collected along the Hudson River in 2000 (wet
weight, ppm).
Figure 3. Total PCB concentrations in soils collected along the Hudson River in 2000 (dry weight,ppm).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1Sample Site
Tota
l PCB
s (p
pm)
DownriverUpriver
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sample Site
Tota
l PC
Bs
(ppm
)
Total PCB concentration
Average Total PCB Concentration
11 10 8 7 1
Upriver Downriver
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
17
Figure 4. Total PCBs (dry weight ppm) in surficial (0-15 cm) floodplain soils by site anddistance from River.
Figure 5. Total PCB concentrations in shrews collected along the Hudson River in 2000(wet weight, ppm).
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4Sample Site
Tota
l PC
Bs (p
pm)
Total PCB concentrationAverage Total PCB Concentration
8 7 1
Upriver Downriver
AB
CD
Site
11Site
10Site 8Site 7
Site 1
0.1
1
10
100
1000
Total PCBs (ppm)
Upriver
Downriver* Subsurface sample (15-25 cm depth)
Closer to river
Further from river
*
AB
CD
Site
11Site
10Site 8Site 7
Site 1
0.1
1
10
100
1000
Total PCBs (ppm)
Upriver
Downriver* Subsurface sample (15-25 cm depth)
Closer to river
Further from river
*
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
18
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
Figure 6. Total PCB concentrations in composite mouse samples collected along the HudsonRiver in 2001 (wet weight, ppm).
Figure 7. Total PCB concentrations in composite vole samples collected along the Hudson Riverin 2001 (wet weight, ppm).
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23
Sample Site
Tota
l PCB
s (p
pm)
Upriver Downriver
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
12 2 20
Sample Site
Tota
l PCB
s (p
pm)
Upriver Downriver
HUDSON RIVERH
UD
SON
RIV
ER D
AT
A RE
PO
RT: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS A
ND
AM
ER
ICA
N W
OO
DC
OC
K CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
19
Figure 8. Total PCBs in shrews collected along the Hudson River in 2001 (wet weight, ppm).
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Sample Site
Tota
l PC
Bs
(ppm
)
Total PCB concentration
Average Total PCB concentration
8 7 1 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23
Upriver Downriver
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Sample Site
Tota
l PC
Bs
(ppm
)
Total PCB concentration
Average Total PCB concentration
8 7 1 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23
Upriver Downriver
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX A
WORK SUMMARY FOR THE COLLECTION OF
SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK
FROM THE FLOODPLAINS OF THE HUDSON RIVER,
NEW YORK
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
WORK SUMMARY
Collection of Small Mammals and American Woodcock from the Floodplains of the Hudson River, New York
Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment
FINAL
May 27, 2004
____________________________________ Christopher Balk, Field Investigation Lead ___________________________________ Quality Assurance Coordinator
3.0 Small Mammal Collection........................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Small Mammal Collection Dates and Study Areas..................................................2 3.2 Small Mammal Collection Procedures ....................................................................2 3.3 Sample Containers and Labeling for Small Mammal Samples ...............................4 3.4 Summary of Small Mammal Samples Collected .....................................................4 4.0 American Woodcock Collection .............................................................................................. 4
4.1 American Woodcock Collection Dates and Study Sites..........................................4 4.2 American Woodcock Collection Procedures ...........................................................5 4.3 Preparation of American Woodcock Samples .........................................................5 4.4 Sample Containers and Labeling for American Woodcock Samples......................6 5.0 Sample Shipping, Analysis and Chain of Custody..........................................................6
6.0 Quality Assurance/Quality Control .........................................................................................7
List of Appendices: Appendix A: Maps for 2001 Small Mammal and Woodcock Collection Sites Appendix B: Small Mammal Data Sheet Appendix C: Chain of Custody Form
1
1.0 Introduction Past and continuing discharges of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have contaminated the natural resources of the Hudson River. The Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees (Trustees) – New York State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of the Interior – are conducting a natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) to assess and restore those natural resources injured by PCBs (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002a). This Work Summary documents a preliminary investigation of PCB contamination of floodplain biota conducted pursuant to the NRDA. In September and October 2000, as part of the Hudson River NRDA, sampling of soil and biota was conducted within the floodplain of the Hudson River between Fort Edward, New York and the Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park (NHP) in Stillwater, New York (SEA Consultants, Inc. 2002). The purpose of the soil and biota sampling was to assist the Trustees in determining whether soil and biota containing PCBs are present in the floodplain of the Hudson River between Fort Edward and Stillwater, New York, and if additional pathway and injury assessment studies should be conducted. As part of the 2000 floodplain investigation, floodplain soil samples were collected from eleven sites along the Hudson River, and analyzed for Total PCBs, Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and grain size. Concurrent with the soil sampling activities, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) conducted biota sampling of small mammals and earthworms at ten of the soil sampling locations and at one additional site. Whole body tissue of short-tailed shrews (Blarina brevicauda) was analyzed for total PCBs and percent lipids, and earthworms were frozen and archived. The Trustees have released a report regarding the 2000 floodplain investigation and results (SEA Consultants Inc. 2002). The results of the September/October 2000 floodplain soil and biota tissue sampling program indicate that floodplain soil in the Upper Hudson River valley between Stillwater, New York and Fort Edward, New York are contaminated by detectable levels of PCBs. In addition, the detection of PCBs in short-tailed shrew tissue indicates the bioavailability of soil PCBs to higher level organisms. In 2001 the Trustees continued the floodplain investigation, collecting small mammals from a number of the 2000 sites and from additional Hudson River floodplain locations, and collecting American woodcock (Scolopax minor) from Hudson River floodplains. This Work Summary documents those 2001 collections of small mammals and woodcocks.
2
2.0 Project Management The investigation team was organized based on tasks and levels of responsibility to ensure good communication between all personnel. The Assessment Manager (Larry Gumaer, NYSDEC) had overall project oversight and responsibility for design and implementation of the investigation, and provided direction to the Field Investigation Lead (Chris Balk, NYSDEC), who was responsible for the field collection. The Field Investigation Lead worked with the Assessment Manager and Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator to ensure that the investigation was consistent with the overall QA objectives of the NRDA. 3.0 Small Mammal Collection
3.1 Small Mammal Collection Dates and Study Areas The collection effort began on September 4, 2001, and concluded on October 18, 2001. The sample collection effort focused on the 12 sites from the 2000 investigation and 11 new sites (designated Study Areas 13 through 23) for 2001. The new study areas are shown on the maps in Appendix A. Nine of the new study areas were located between the Saratoga Battlefield NHP in Stillwater, New York, and the Federal Dam at Troy, New York, and two were located between the Federal Dam at Troy and Poughkeepsie, New York.
3.2 Small Mammal Collection Procedures Snap traps were used to make the small mammal collections. Trapping was aimed at collecting in low lying areas close to the river that showed signs of flooding, appeared to flood or were known to flood during periods of high river flow. The traps were checked on a daily basis with the exception of two instances (September 11, 2001 involving collection at Study Areas 4 and 7; and September 25, 2001 involving collection at Study Areas 13 and 21) in which traps were checked only once within 48 hours. Of the nine study areas located between Saratoga NHP and the Federal Dam at Troy, two were not used for small mammal collection. No collection was made at Study Area 14 due to the lack of suitable small mammal habitat in the floodplain and a general lack of floodplain area at the site. No collection was made at Study Area 19 due to the lack of small mammal sign and due to evidence that this site was on an island that was periodically completely inundated with floodwaters.
3
All shrews and small mammals collected were placed in a Quality Assured, 60ml wide-mouth glass sample jar with a Teflon lined lid, one animal per jar, labeled and put on ice in a cooler in the field. As each sample was collected in the field it was recorded on a “Small Mammal Data Sheet” (Appendix B) and those data sheets were put into a binder to form a field log of activities. In the field, the following data were recorded on the small mammal data sheets: date, weather, capture site # / name, personnel, sample #, time, distance to a reference marker or river edge, and any notes. Each sample was identified to species, where possible, or to genus. Fresh weights for the small mammal samples were not taken due to time and personnel constraints at the time of sampling, and later, Quality Assurance/Quality Control concerns about re-opening the jars and thawing the samples to work with them precluded collecting such information. Subsequently, the program analytical laboratory recorded the weights of the samples prior to homogenization. At the end of each day, the small mammal samples collected were taken to the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station. The samples collected were entered on numbered Chain-of-Custody (COC) forms (Appendix C) and placed into the secure walk-in freezer at the Hale Creek Field Station in a sealed box for storage at -20 degrees Celsius. The samples were stored at -20 Celsius until shipment to the program analytical laboratory for chemical analysis. The collected animals were given sample identification numbers using a modification of the format used for the 2000 study. Sample identification numbers for 2001 were designated as follows: Example: 07-02-091201
• the first two digits (07) are the site number (Study Area 7 in this example); • the next two digits indicate that it was the second animal collected at this location; and, • the final six digits indicate the date of collection in a MM/DD/YY format, such as
091201 to indicate that it was collected on 09/12/01 (September 12, 2001).
4
3.3 Sample Containers and Labeling for Small Mammal Samples
Each sample was placed individually in a chemically clean glass jar. To each sample jar was affixed a waterproof label indicating the following: Site number Project name Date and time collected Analyses requested Method of preservation Initials of sampling personnel
3.4 Summary of Small Mammal Samples Collected In the 2001 effort, small mammals were collected from 11 of the sites from the 2000 study (Site Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12) and from 9 of the new sites (Study Areas 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, and 23). Table 1 provides a description of the sample sites used in the 2000 and 2001 floodplain investigations, and the types of samples collected from each site. A total of 418 mammals were collected from the Hudson River floodplain study areas in 2001. Table 2 provides a breakdown by study area and species of small mammals collected in 2001. There were a very small number of additional animals that were trapped but not collected for potential analysis due to the fact that those animals were not whole when found in the trap; the Field Investigation Lead estimates this to be less than 2 percent of the total number of animals captured. Specimens found in the trap partially eaten, dismembered, or otherwise not sufficiently intact, were discarded with a few exceptions. If the animal was largely intact it was collected for potential future analysis. 4.0 American Woodcock Collection
4.1 American Woodcock Collection Dates and Study Sites The collection took place on September 27, 2001. Three sites were selected for potential woodcock collection; those sites were as follows: in the vicinity of Site 4; north of Site 5; and, in the vicinity of Site 8. These sites were selected, based on the ability to gain access to them (considering both logistics of access and permission to access having been granted), site topography and reconnaissance at the site. Collection site locations were a waypoint recorded with a GPS unit.
5
The goal of the investigation was to collect four woodcock per each of the three sites. Collection activities were focused on low lying areas close to the river that showed signs of flooding, appeared to flood or were known to flood during periods of high river flow.
4.2 American Woodcock Collection Procedures On September 27, 2001, under appropriate State and Federal permits, the Field Investigation Lead collected two American woodcock in the floodplain of the Hudson River in Washington County, along the eastern bank of the river, approximately 0.5 miles south of the southern end of the Saratoga Battlefield NHP (near Study Area 13). The birds were collected using traditional hunting methods (a shotgun and dog). Each woodcock collected was wrapped in aluminum foil and placed individually into a zippered plastic bag, labeled, and put on ice in a cooler in the field. Collected birds were each given a sample identification number, as follows: HRW-001, and HRW-002, where “HRW” represents “Hudson River Woodcock” and the numbers (-001 and -002) are the animal (specimen) numbers. Data recorded on a collection record, carcass tag, and memo to the file, included the following: site number, species, weight, beak length, capture date, and GPS waypoint of the collection site. The birds were tagged in the field, placed on ice as soon as possible, and located with a Garmin GPS 12 global positioning unit. At the end of the day, the samples collected were entered on numbered COC forms (Appendix C) and placed into the secure walk-in freezer (-20 C) at the Hale Creek Field Station in a sealed box. A total of two American woodcock were collected, both from habitat adjacent to Study Area 13. Although the goal had been to collect four woodcocks from each of three sites this could not be accomplished due to staff and time constraints.
4.3 Preparation of American Woodcock Samples On the day of collection, at the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station laboratory, within four hours of collection, the birds were weighed with a Fischer Scientific XT top-loading balance, and culmen lengths measured with a dial caliper. The liver was dissected out of each bird, using new single-use disposable instruments. Each liver was placed into a chemically clean glass jar with a Teflon lid and the jar labeled as described below.
6
4.4 Sample Containers and Labeling for American Woodcock Samples
Each woodcock liver sample was placed individually in a chemically clean glass jar with a Teflon lid. To each sample jar was affixed a waterproof label indicating the following: Unique sample number (HRW-001 or HRW-002) Site number Date of collection Species Method of preservation Initials of sampling personnel The woodcock liver samples and their corresponding carcasses were placed in a custody-sealed box and stored in the secure walk-in freezer at the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station. The samples were stored at -20 degrees Celsius. Liver samples were subsequently shipped to the program analytical laboratory for chemical analysis. Carcass samples remain in frozen storage (at -20 degrees Celsius) at the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station. 5.0 Sample Shipping, Analysis and Chain of Custody On July 25, 2002, selected small mammal samples (total of 169 samples consisting of 61 short-tailed shrews, 94 deer mice and white-footed mice, and 14 voles) and the two woodcock liver samples were sent to the program analytical laboratory for analysis. The small mammal samples were selected for analysis based on consistency with genus and species of animals previously collected in 2000 and analyzed, and considering for which sufficient numbers had been captured at various study areas, based on anticipated subsequent compositing of animals at the program analytical laboratory. COC forms were prepared with the appropriate signatures as the small mammal and woodcock liver samples were transferred from the Hale Creek Field Station by NYSDEC staff to the program analytical laboratory. Strict maintenance of COC is important to demonstrate sample integrity. The sample jars containing the small mammal samples and the woodcock liver samples were shipped to the program analytical laboratory for analysis in the boxes in which they were originally shipped to the collector. The Field Investigation Lead delivered the samples in person. Wet ice was used to keep the samples frozen during shipment.
7
The COC forms were signed by the Field Investigation Lead and kept inside a zippered plastic bag in the cooler during shipping. The COC forms accompanied the sample shipments and document the transfer of the samples from the field team to the laboratory. As the samples were received by the laboratory, they were logged in and any damaged or broken custody seals were noted. Samples not shipped to the analytical laboratory have been retained in the NYSDEC Hale Creek Field Station freezer in storage at -20 degrees Celsius. 6.0 Quality Assurance/Quality Control In July 2002 the Trustees finalized an Analytical Quality Assurance Plan (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002b). In September 2002, the Trustees issued a Quality Assurance Management Plan (as part of the NRDA Plan) (Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees 2002a). The small mammal and woodcock collections in August 2001 thus predate the Trustees’ Analytical QA Plan and the QA Management Plan. The analysis of these samples, however, post-dates these two plans. Accordingly, the analysis of the 2001 samples was conducted in a fashion to be in compliance with the requirements of the QA Management Plan and the Analytical QA Plan. Data Quality Assessment Reports document the results of the quality assurance review of data from analysis of the small mammal and woodcock liver tissue samples. The original data sheets have been retained at the Hale Creek Field Station, and will be maintained by NYSDEC and archived for a minimum of fifteen years. Any disposal of the data sheets will be coordinated with the DOI and NOAA after this timeframe unless a longer archive period is requested. Analytical data resulting from this investigation will be validated as specified in the Analytical QA Plan. 7.0 References Cited Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2002a. Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment Plan. September 2002. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD. Hudson River Natural Resource Trustees. 2002b. Analytical Quality Assurance Plan for the Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Public Release Version. July 9, 2002, Version 1.0. U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD. SEA Consultants, Inc. 2002. Hudson River Natural Resources Damage Assessment, Floodplain Soil and Biota Screening Sampling Report. SEA Consultants, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. Report Prepared for Industrial Economics, Inc. SEA Project No. 2000416.01-A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. Action Memorandum: Request for removal action for the Rogers Island Site, Fort Edward, Washington County, New York, by Jack D. Harmon, On-scene Coordinator, Removal Action Branch. September 28.
8
Table 1: Sampling Site Descriptions – 2000 and 2001 Floodplain Samples Site No.
Descriptive Name of Site
Location / Description Samples Collected
Sites from 2000 Floodplain Study from which Collections were made in 2001 1 Southern Park West bank of Hudson River in southern corner of
Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park. A wide low-lying area of undisturbed wooded wetland.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
2 Battlefield Meadow
West bank of Hudson River near Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park entrance. The site is a wet meadow separated from the Hudson River by an old roadbed and receives floodwaters via a culvert during high river stage.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
3 River Road West bank of the Hudson River, along River Road just upstream of the Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park. The sampling site is a small low lying, wooded wetland area adjacent to an open water scrub-shrub wetland. The site is located west of River Road and is apparently flooded via a narrow culvert (approximately 18 inch diameter) under the road.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
4 Fishing Hole A large low-lying wooded wetland on the west bank of the Hudson River, south of Coveville. The site is accessed by a small boat ramp approximately 100 m south of Hanehan Road. The site is generally undisturbed, with the exception of an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) path which cuts through along the riverbank. The site appears to be frequently flooded.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
5 Opposite Coveville
East bank of Hudson River, off Rt. 113 opposite Coveville. The site is an undisturbed, low-lying wooded wetland area with large quantities of debris apparently deposited from flooding events.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
6 Schuylerville A wide, low-lying undisturbed mature wooded wetland site on the west bank of the Hudson River. The site is accessed through a large cornfield south of Schuylerville, just south of Schuyler Street.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
9
Site No.
Descriptive Name of Site
Location / Description Samples Collected
7 Near River Mile 187
A low-lying site on the bank of the Hudson River. Half of the site is wooded, with a strip of grass adjacent to the river on the other half.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
8 Peters Rd. / Floodgates
West bank of the Hudson River, just upstream of Thompson Island. The site is just south of Peters Rd. and adjacent to a large wetland area. The eastern half of the soil sampling transect is flooded directly by the Hudson. The western half of the transect is located west of County Route 29, extending into the wooded wetland area. The wetland area regularly receives floodwaters via a pair of 48-inch culverts (formerly iron floodgates) that go under Route 29. These culverts are of sufficient size and invert elevation such that flooding from the river appears to be essentially unrestricted.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
9 Near River Mile 191
This small area is apparently flooded via a culvert that goes under a road, connecting the site with the Hudson River. The culvert invert was several feet above the river level at the time of sampling, and was somewhat constricted with debris.
2000: soil 2001: no samples collected
10 Canal Corp. East bank of the Hudson River, south of Fort Edward, and just north of Black House Rd. The site is a low-lying wooded wetland adjacent to a small stream channel.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
11 Rogers Island East bank of Rogers Island, approximately 0.1 miles south of railroad trestle. The site is a disturbed deciduous forested area slightly elevated above the river. Soil samples previously collected on Rogers Island by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 1999) indicated that soils were contaminated with PCBs.
2000: soil, shrews, earthworms 2001: small mammals
10
Site No.
Descriptive Name of Site
Location / Description Samples Collected
12 Rogers Island South
East bank of Rogers Island near the southern end of the island. The site is slightly elevated above the Hudson River (bank approximately 4 feet above river). Site is forested near the riverbank and adjacent to an old meadow. Soil samples previously collected on Rogers Island by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 1999) indicated that soils were contaminated with PCBs. This site was added for shrews collection (in the 2000 study) as it provided more suitable habitat than at Site 11.
2000: shrews 2001: small mammals
New Sites for 2001 13 Opposite Site
#1 Along east bank of Hudson River; mature woodland floodplain south of Site #1.
2001: small mammals, woodcock
14 South of Site 1
0.8 miles south of Site 1 along west bank of the Hudson River
No samples collected
15 Near Stillwater Union Cemetery
Along west river bank, between Stilwater Union cemetery and the Hudson River, about 1.5 miles upstream of Lock #4; wooded wetland dominated by silver maple.
2001: small mammals
16 Lock #4 Along east bank of Hudson River, adjacent to Lock #4; this site is primarily woodland adjacent to a pond and wetland.
2001: small mammals
17 Mechanicville Island
Unnamed island south of the New York State Route 67 bridge in Mechanicville; wooded island dominated by poplar.
2001: small mammals
18 Lock #2 Along west bank of Hudson River, just south of Lock #2; scrub/shrub habitat transitioning to rock/sand/gravel at the water’s edge
2001: small mammals
19 Island north of Campbell Island
An island in the Hudson River just north of Campbell Island
No samples collected
20 Campbell Island
Site is located on the northern end of Campbell Island just south of Lock #1; site is wooded, dominated by poplars with a fern understory.
2001: small mammals
21 North of Waterford
Along west bank of Hudson River; the floodplain of a river-associated wetland 1¼ miles south of the U.S. Route 4 bridge in Waterford; site is wooded, dominated by silver maples and poplars.
2001: small mammals
11
Site No.
Descriptive Name of Site
Location / Description Samples Collected
22 Papscanee Island
Along east bank of Hudson River, in the Papscanee Island nature preserve; site is wooded, dominated by poplars.
2001: small mammals
23 Upper Schodack Island
Along east bank of Hudson River in the newly created Schodack Island State Park, about ¼ mile south of the boat launch; site is wooded, dominated by poplars.
2001: small mammals
Note: For Site Nos. 1 through 12, Site Nos., Descriptive Name of Site, Location/Description and Samples Collected in 2001 are from the 2000 Floodplain Study report (SEA Consultants, Inc. 2002).
12
Table 2. Summary of Small Mammals Collected in 2001 from Hudson River floodplain sites (see Table 1 for site names, locations). Site No. Peromyscus
Maps for 2001 Small Mammal and Woodcock Collection Sites (Sites are described in Table 1)
1
These sites are just south of the Saratoga Battlefield National Historic Park
This site is located between the Saratoga Battlefield and Stillwater
2
This site is at Lock #4 near Stillwater.
This site is on an island near Mechanicville.
3
This site is at Lock #2 south of Mechanicville These areas are near the GE plant just north of Waterford.
4
Study area just north of Waterford
Study Area 22
5
Study area 23 on Upper Schodack Is.
Appendix B
Small Mammal Data Sheet
Hudson River Floodplain Biota Sampling Project Small mammal data sheet Date:___________________ Weather:__________________________ Site # / Name:__________________ Personnel:_________________________ Sample #: ____________________ Time:_____________________ NOTES: Species:_______________________________ Weight: (g) Total Length: (mm) Body Length: (mm) Distance to: Reference Marker River Edge
Appendix C
Chain of Custody Form
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX B
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORTHUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT FLOODPLAIN STUDY
WOODCOCK LIVER TISSUE ANDEARTHWORM TISSUE
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT
HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
FLOODPLAIN STUDY Woodcock Liver Tissue and Earthworm Tissue
Prepared for: State of New York
Department of Environmental Conservation
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
February 2, 2004
Version 1.0
Data Quality Assessment Earthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 2.0 DATA VALIDATION PROCEDURES.................................................1 3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT........................................................3
3.1 Holding Times and Sample Preservation......................................................................3
ATTACHMENT A: Data Validation Reports by Sample Delivery Group …...…………A - 1
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
1
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment
Woodcock Liver Tissue and Earthworm Tissue
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report documents the results of a quality assurance review of data from woodcock liver tissue and earthworm tissue samples collected in support of the Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. The samples were analyzed for PCB congeners, PCB homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids, and percent moisture.
A total of two woodcock livers and ten earthworm composites were submitted for analysis. These samples were analyzed in one laboratory analytical batch. The tissues were prepped, extracted, and analyzed by the Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories (Raynham, Massachusetts) using laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that were submitted and reviewed prior to sample receipt.
2.0 DATA VALIDATION PROCEDURES
Data validation was based on the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) criteria documented in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan for the Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Version 1.0, July 9, 2002, and USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, 1999, and the following laboratory SOPs:
• Additional cleanup, sample handling, storage, custody SOPs as necessary.
Sample results and related QC data were received in both an electronic and hard copy format. Electronic data were verified against the hard copy data package. All of the data received a full validation.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
2
The following QC elements were reviewed:
• Analytical holding times
• Chain of custody and sample handling
• GC/MS tune verification (from summary forms)
• Method blank contamination (from summary forms)
• Initial and continuing calibration (from summary forms)
• Analytical accuracy: surrogates, matrix spike samples, laboratory control samples, and standard reference material results (from summary forms)
• Reported detection limits (from sample result summaries)
• Compound identification (from raw data)
• Compound quantitation, transcription and calculation checks performed at a frequency of 10% from raw data. If an error was noted, 100% of the calculations and transcriptions for that data set were verified.
This report summarizes the results of data validation relative to the analytical data quality objectives (ADQO) for precision, accuracy, and completeness. The report also provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the data and identifies potential sources of error, uncertainty, and bias that may affect the overall usability.
Laboratory QC samples were used to assess the effectiveness of homogenization procedures and to evaluate laboratory-derived contamination, laboratory performance, and sample matrix effects. Quality control samples included: method blanks, laboratory control samples (LCS), matrix spike (MS) samples, laboratory duplicate samples, and standard reference material (SRM) analyses. Surrogates were added to each sample analyzed for PCB congeners to further assess the effects of sample matrix on accuracy.
Data were qualified when associated QC sample results were outside the QC limits. The following definitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data validation process:
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
3
J Estimated: The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. The analyte was detected, but the reported value may not be accurate or precise. The “J” qualification indicates the data fell outside the QC limits, but the exceedance was not sufficient to cause rejection of the data.
R Rejected: Unreliable result. Data should not be used.
3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT
The data package submitted by the laboratory was reviewed to determine whether the analytical data quality objectives (ADQO) specified in Tables 6.1a - 6.1c in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan were met. Each quality control element is discussed briefly below. More details are available in the individual data validation reports presented in Attachment A.
3.1 Holding Times and Sample Preservation
The primary analytes of concern for this study are persistent compounds, which have been found to remain stable in tissue after several years of storage. Due to this, no maximum holding time criterion was established. The woodcock liver tissues were extracted approximately two years after collection and the earthworm tissues were extracted approximately three years after collection. All extracts were analyzed within 30 days from sample extraction. Samples were kept frozen by the laboratory at the required temperature of -20oC ±2o.
3.2 Instrument Calibration
3.2.1 Initial Calibration (ICAL)
The ADQO specification for the initial calibration is that a minimum of a five point calibration would be performed for all analytes, and that the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) values for all analytes are less than 20%.
All submitted ICAL data met the specified ADQO.
3.2.2 Continuing Calibration (CCAL)
The ADQO specified for the continuing (or daily) calibrations is that a CCAL must be analyzed at the beginning and end of each analytical sequence (or every 12 hours, whichever is more frequent), and that all percent difference (%D) values must be less than 20%.
All CCAL met the ADQO requirements.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
4
3.3 GC/MS Tune
GC/MS instrument tuning verifications were performed at the proper frequency, prior to each analytical sequence. All GC/MS tunes met the acceptance criteria specified in the laboratory standard operating procedures.
3.4 Blank Analyses
The method blank was acceptable, in that no target analytes were detected in the method blank.
3.5 Accuracy
Accuracy is evaluated by comparison of an analytical concentration to a known (true) value. Accuracy was monitored through the use of surrogate compounds in each sample, and SRM, MS, and laboratory control sample (blank spike) analyses. Each QC element is discussed below. Overall, accuracy was acceptable.
3.5.1 Surrogate Compounds
Two surrogate compounds, 13C-BZ#19 and 13C-BZ#202, were added to each sample prior to extraction.
The ADQO specified for surrogate compounds is that all percent recovery (%R) values would be within the 50% - 125% acceptance window. The recovery value from the late eluting surrogate (13C-BZ#202) is used for the quantitation of the reported target analyte concentrations.
All of the surrogate %R values were within the 50% - 125% control limits.
3.5.2 Standard Reference Material Analyses
An SRM was extracted and analyzed with the analytical batch. The SRM selected for this study was 1974b, Organics in Mussel Tissue. This SRM has certified values for 27 PCB congeners.
The ADQO for the SRM is that the reported value must be within ±20% of the 95% confidence interval of the true value, for analytes with values greater than five times the method detection limit (MDL).
The SRM accuracy results met the ADQO requirements.
Table 1 summarizes the SRM results for this study.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
5
3.5.3 Laboratory Control Samples
The laboratory performed laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses at the required frequency of one for every 15 samples or analytical batch, whichever was more frequent. The ADQO for the LCS analyses is that all %R values must be within the acceptance limits of 75% to 125%; however, if only one analyte %R value is outside the control limits, the laboratory is not required to re-extract the associated samples.
One LCS %R value (PCB189) was outside the 75% to 125% control limits. The LCS %R value was greater than the upper control limit, indicating a potential high bias. Associated positive results were estimated (J); reporting limits were judged as unaffected and no action was taken. Four data points were estimated based on this LCS %R outlier.
3.5.4 Matrix Spike Samples
The laboratory performed the MS analysis at the required frequency of one for every 15 samples or analytical batch. The MS sample included 47 spiked analytes. The ADQO for MS analyses is that all %R values should be within the 50% to 125% control limits. The ADQO does not apply if the concentration in the parent sample is greater than five times the concentration in the spiking solution.
A potential high bias was indicated by the recoveries for five compounds, as the %R values were greater than 125% (ranging from 129% to 433%). Positive results associated with an elevated MS %R value were estimated (J) to indicate a potential high bias. No action was taken if the compound was not detected. One data point (the detection limit for PCB123 in Sample EW-05) was associated with a 0% recovery value in the MS analysis. This data point was rejected (R).
Qualifiers were issued only to the target analyte in the parent sample associated with the MS %R outlier. Three data points were estimated (J). One data point (the detection limit for PCB123 in Sample EW-05) was rejected (R) due to a 0% recovery value in the MS analysis.
3.5.5 Internal Standards
Internal standards were added to each field and QC sample prior to injection onto the analytical instrument. The ADQO for internal standards is that the area of the internal standards in each analysis must be within ±50% of the area of the internal standard in the associated CCAL.
All internal standard areas met the ADQO.
3.6 Precision
Precision is evaluated through replicate analyses of a sample. For this study, a laboratory duplicate was analyzed with each analytical batch. No field duplicates were submitted. Overall, precision was judged as acceptable.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
6
3.6.1 Laboratory Duplicate Samples
For samples with positive results greater than or equal to five times the method detection limit, the ADQO specified relative percent difference (RPD) control limit for laboratory duplicates is 30%. One laboratory duplicate was submitted.
For the PCB congeners and homologue groups, one value (PCB47) was greater than 30% (at 33%). For percent lipids and percent moisture analyses, the RPD control limit is 15%. The percent moisture analyses RPD value met the ADQO, while the percent lipids RPD value (at 22%) exceeded the ADQO.
The target analyte associated with RPD outliers was estimated (J) in the parent sample. A total of two values were estimated due to laboratory precision outliers.
Table 2 summarizes the results of the laboratory duplicate analyses.
3.7 Reporting Limits and Sample Results
Method detection limits (MDLs) were determined using low level spikes in tissue from laboratory mice following procedures outlined in the US Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B).
The detection limits for target congeners were generally in the range of 0.02 µg/Kg to 0.22 µg/Kg, with a co-elution of PCB31/28 at 1.38 g/Kg. There were 14 target congeners with MDL values greater than the 0.1 µg/Kg target MDL. The PCB31/28 co-elution MDL value was elevated due to interferences which could not be resolved using the selected method.
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of the reported congeners. No instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable. All reported results were judged to be accurate unless qualified for some other reason.
3.8 Completeness
Out of 720 results reported by the laboratory (12 samples each with 47 congeners, ten homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids and percent moisture), a total of eight (1.1%) data points were qualified as estimated (J) and one data point was rejected (R). The completeness level attained for the analysis of the field samples is greater than 99.8%.
3.9 Summary of Data Usability
A total of eight out of 720 results were estimated because of laboratory accuracy and precision outliers. One data point was rejected due to a %R outlier. The rejected data point should not be
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
7
used for any purpose. For all other data, the overall quality of the data is acceptable and the results, as qualified, are considered usable.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
ATTACHMENT A
Data Validation Reports
by Sample Data Group (SDG)
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Woods Hole Group This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of woodcock liver and earthworm tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts. The following table is a list of samples reviewed.
Field ID Laboratory ID Common Name EW-01 0309077-03 Earthworm composite EW-02 0309077-04 Earthworm composite EW-03 0309077-05 Earthworm composite EW-04 0309077-06 Earthworm composite EW-05 0309077-07 Earthworm composite EW-06 0309077-08 Earthworm composite EW-07 0309077-09 Earthworm composite EW-08 0309077-10 Earthworm composite EW-10 0309077-11 Earthworm composite EW-11 0309077-12 Earthworm composite
HRW-001 0309077-01 American Woodcock HRW-002 0309077-02 American Woodcock
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check Standard Reference Material Initial Calibration (ICAL) 2 Laboratory Duplicate
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 1 Reporting Limits and Sample Results 2 Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Electronic Deliverable Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
A - 2
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The percent difference (%D) value for the monochlorobiphenyl homologue group was greater than the control limit of +20% in the CCAL standard analyzed October 6, 2003 at 10:58. Only dilution analyses were associated with this CCAL, and results for the monochlorobiphenyl homologue group were not reported from these analyses. No action was taken.
Matrix Spike Matrix spike (MS) analysis was performed using Sample EW-05. Target congeners were present in this sample at concentrations ranging from 0.71 µg/Kg to 662 µg/Kg, with many concentrations greater than 50 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (9.56 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results are masked by the high PCB concentrations in the sample.
Results for PCB18, PCB114, and PCB189 were estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the percent recovery (%R) values were greater than 125%, but the concentrations in the parent sample were less than five times the spike amount. Recovery values for PCB77 and PCB81 were also greater than the control limit; however, these congeners were not detected in the parent sample. As the outliers indicate a potential high bias, the reporting limits were not affected. No action was taken. The value for PCB123 was rejected (R-8), as the %R value was 0%.
Laboratory Control Samples The %R value for PCB189 was greater than the 125% upper control limit in the laboratory control (LCS) sample associated with this SDG. Positive results for PCB189 were estimated (J-10) in the samples.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample EW-07. The relative percent difference (RPD) value for congener PCB47 was greater than the 30% upper control limit (at 33%). The PCB47 value was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
The RPD value for the percent lipids determination was greater than the control limit of 15%, at 22%. The lipids result was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
Compound Identification Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all reported congeners. No instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results Samples EW-05, EW-06, EW-08, and EW-10 were analyzed at dilution due to levels of some congeners that were greater than the linear range of the calibration. Both the initial and the diluted
Data Quality AssessmentEarthworm and Woodcock Livers
Version 1.0 February 2, 2004
A - 3
analyses were reported. In order that only one set of data be reported, the results from the initial analysis that were greater than the linear range of the calibration were qualified do-not-report (DNR-20). Results for all compounds, except those qualified do-not-report in the initial analysis, were qualified do-not-report (DNR-14) in the dilution analyses.
For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In some cases, the reported trichlorobiphenyl and heptachlorobiphenyl homologue group total values were less than the sum of the individual congeners. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl and heptachlorobiphenyl results, the greatest difference between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported result is 2.1%. The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
III OVERALL ASSESSMENT
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, LCS, standard reference material, and MS %R values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the RPD values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to MS and laboratory control sample %R outliers and laboratory precision outliers. One reporting limit was rejected due to a MS %R outlier. Data were qualified as do-not-report to indicate the usable result when multiple results were reported.
Data that has been rejected or qualified as do-not-report should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX C
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORTHUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT FLOODPLAIN STUDY
2001 SMALL MAMMALS TISSUE AND 2000 SHREWSAND SOILS
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT
HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
FLOODPLAIN STUDY
2001 Small Mammals Tissue and
2000 Shrews and Soils
Prepared for: State of New York
Department of Environmental Conservation
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
February 19, 2004
Version 1.1
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 2.0 DATA VALIDATION PROCEDURES.................................................1 3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT........................................................3
3.1 Holding Times and Sample Preservation......................................................................3
3.9 Summary of Data Usability.............................................................................................9
Table 1A: Summary of Standard Reference Material Results
Table 1B: Summary of Standard Reference Material Results: Statistical Evaluation
Table 2: Small Mammal Laboratory Duplicate Relative Percent Difference Summary Attachment A Sample Index ............................................................................................. A-1 Attachment B Data Validation Reports by Sample Delivery Group (SDG) ................... B-1
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
1
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment
Small Mammal Study
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report documents the results of a quality assurance review of data from small mammal tissue samples collected in support of the Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment. The samples were analyzed for PCB congeners, PCB homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids, and percent moisture. A list of the samples analyzed is provided in Attachment A.
A total of 61 shrews and 108 mice/voles were submitted for analysis. The mice were composited into 18 composites of five animals and one composite of four animals, and the voles were composited into two composites of five animals each and one composite of four animals. The total number of shrews and composites analyzed was 83, grouped into six analytical batches by the laboratory.
In addition to the small mammals that were collected in 2001, the laboratory also analyzed 18 soils and 12 shrews that were collected in 2000. The soils and shrew analyses were each reported in a separate analytical batch, and will be referred to as the ‘2000 analyses’ to differentiate from the small mammals collected in 2001. The same target analyte list was performed for the 2000 analyses and the 2001 small mammal analyses, except that percent lipids are not analyzed for the soil samples.
The mammal tissue and soils were prepped, extracted, and analyzed by the Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories (Raynham, Massachusetts) using laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that were submitted and reviewed prior to sample receipt.
2.0 DATA VALIDATION PROCEDURES
Data validation was based on the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) criteria documented in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan for the Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Version 1.0, July 9, 2002, and USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, 1999, and the following Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories SOPs:
• Additional cleanup, sample handling, storage, custody SOPs as necessary.
Sample results and related QC data were received in both an electronic and hard copy format. A minimum of 10% of all electronic data were verified against the hard copy data package. All of the 2001 small mammal data received a full validation. The 2000 analyses received a summary validation.
The following QC elements were reviewed for data packages undergoing summary validation:
• Analytical holding times
• Chain of custody and sample handling
• GC/MS tune verification (from summary forms)
• Method blank contamination (from summary forms)
• Initial and continuing calibration (from summary forms)
• Rinsate blank contamination (from sample result summaries)
• Analytical accuracy: surrogates, matrix spike samples, laboratory control samples, and standard reference material results (from summary forms)
• Reported detection limits (from sample result summaries)
Full validation included review of all the items listed above for summary validation, plus the following QC elements:
• Compound identification (from raw data)
• Compound quantitation, transcription and calculation checks performed at a frequency of 10% from raw data. If an error was noted, 100% of the calculations and transcriptions for that data set were verified.
This report summarizes the results of data validation relative to the analytical data quality objectives (ADQO) for precision, accuracy, and completeness. The report also provides a quantitative and
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
3
qualitative assessment of the data and identifies potential sources of error, uncertainty, and bias that may affect the overall usability.
Laboratory QC samples were used to assess the effectiveness of homogenization procedures and to evaluate laboratory-derived contamination, laboratory performance, and sample matrix effects. Quality control samples included: equipment rinsate blanks, method blanks, laboratory control samples (LCS), matrix spike (MS) samples, laboratory duplicate samples, and standard reference material (SRM) analyses. Surrogates were added to each sample analyzed for PCB congeners to further assess the affects of sample matrix on accuracy.
Data were qualified when associated QC sample results were outside the QC limits. The following definitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data validation process:
J Estimated: The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. The analyte was detected, but the reported value may not be accurate or precise. The “J” qualification indicates the data fell outside the QC limits, but the exceedance was not sufficient to cause rejection of the data.
UJ Estimated/Not detected: An analysis was performed for the compound or analyte, but it was not detected and the sample quantitation or detection limit may be inaccurate or imprecise. The associated numerical result is the detection limit.
NJ Tentatively Identified/Estimated: The analyte was tentatively identified and the associated numerical value is an estimated quantity.
R Rejected: Unreliable result. Data should not be used.
3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT
The data packages submitted by the laboratory were reviewed to determine whether the analytical data quality objectives (ADQO) specified in Tables 6.1a - 6.1c in the Analytical Quality Assurance Plan were met. Each quality control element is discussed briefly below. More details are available in the data validation reports for each data package presented in Attachment B.
3.1 Holding Times and Sample Preservation
The primary analytes of concern for this study are persistent compounds, which have been found to remain stable in tissue after several years of storage. Due to this, no maximum holding time criterion was established. For the small mammal tissues, all samples were extracted within 195 days of collection, and all extracts were analyzed within 30 days from sample extraction. The 2000 analyses were extracted over three years after collection, and analyzed within 32 days of sample extraction. Samples were kept frozen by the laboratory at the required temperature of -20oC ±2o.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
4
3.2 Instrument Calibration
3.2.1 Initial Calibration (ICAL)
The ADQO specification for the initial calibration is that a minimum of a five point calibration would be performed for all analytes, and that the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) values for all analytes are less than 20%. Up to 10% of the analyte %RSD values can be greater than 20% provided that all %RSD values are less than 30%.
All submitted ICAL data met the ADQO. There were three %RSD values greater than 20% (but less than 30%) in the ICAL associated with the 2000 soil analyses. Positive results associated with %RSD outliers were estimated (J). Eighteen results (0.96% of the total of the 2000 analyses results) were qualified based on ICAL %RSD outliers.
3.2.2 Continuing Calibration (CCAL)
The ADQO for the continuing (or daily) calibrations is that a CCAL must be analyzed at the beginning and end of each analytical sequence (or every 12 hours, whichever is more frequent), and that all percent difference (%D) values should be less than 20%. Up to three %D values can be greater than 20%, provided that all %D values are less than 30%.
All CCAL met the ADQO requirements.
For the 2001 small mammal tissue analyses, one %D value was greater than 20% (but less than 30%) in six of the CCAL. These outliers were either associated only with quality control analyses (SRM, LCS, or MS), or the outlier indicated a potential high bias and the affected congener was not detected. No data were qualified based on CCAL %D outliers.
For the 2000 soil analyses, one to three %D values were greater than 20% (but less than 30%) in three of the CCAL. As the outliers indicated a potential low bias, positive results and the reporting limits for non-detected results associated with %D outliers were estimated (J/UJ). Twenty-three results (1.3% of the total of the 2000 analyses results) were qualified based on CCAL %D outliers.
3.3 GC/MS Tune
GC/MS instrument tuning verifications were performed at the proper frequency, prior to each analytical sequence. All GC/MS tunes met the acceptance criteria specified in the laboratory standard operating procedures.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
5
3.4 Blank Analyses
3.4.1 Method Blanks
All method blanks were acceptable, in that no target analytes were detected in any of the method blanks.
3.4.2 Equipment Rinsate Blanks
A total of six equipment rinsate blanks were collected with the small mammal tissues. The rinsate blanks were prepared by rinsing the equipment used to homogenize the small mammal tissue samples, and analyzing the rinsate.
There were no positive results for any target analytes in the rinsate blanks.
3.5 Accuracy
Accuracy is evaluated by comparison of an analytical concentration to a known (true) value. Accuracy was monitored through the use of surrogate compounds in each sample, and SRM, MS, and LCS (blank spike) analyses. Each QC element is discussed below. Overall, accuracy was acceptable for all small mammal analyses.
3.5.1 Surrogate Compounds
Two surrogate compounds, 13C-PCB19 and 13C-PCB202, were added to each sample prior to extraction.
The ADQO specified for surrogate compounds is that all percent recovery (%R) values be within the 50% - 125% acceptance window. The recovery value from the later eluting surrogate (13C-PCB202) is used for the quantitation of the reported target analyte concentrations.
All of the surrogate %R values were within the 50% - 125% control limits.
3.5.2 Standard Reference Material Analyses
An SRM was extracted and analyzed with each analytical batch. The SRM selected for the small mammal tissues (including the 2000 shrew analyses) was 1974b, Organics in Mussel Tissue. This SRM has certified values for 27 of the target PCB congeners. One SRM analysis was submitted with each laboratory batch, so a total of seven SRM analyses (with 26 certified values each, for a total of 182 data points) were performed.
The ADQO for the SRM is that the reported value must be within ±20% of the 95% confidence interval of the true value for congeners whose concentration in the SRM is greater than five times the method detection limit (MDL). This ADQO was used by the laboratory to evaluate the reported
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
6
results. However, during data validation, no data were qualified unless the reported value was greater than ±25% of the 95% confidence interval.
Overall, the small mammal tissue SRM accuracy results were acceptable. A total of 13 SRM results (7.1% of the total) were outside the ±20% control limit. Of the 13 outliers, four (2.2% of the total) were also outside the control limits established by ±25% of the 95% confidence interval. The four outliers were associated with the 2001 small mammal tissue analyses.
Three of these results were greater than the upper control limit (125% of the 95% confidence interval for an individual congener). The outliers were for each of the following congeners: PCB74, PCB138, and PCB180. The positive results associated with these three SRM outliers were estimated (J) to indicate a potential high bias. The result for one data point, for congener PCB158, was less than the lower control limit (75% of the 95% confidence interval). Both positive results and reporting limits associated with this outlier were estimated (J/UJ), indicating a potential low bias for positive results, or a potential that the detection limit may be elevated. Fifty-three results (1.1% of the 2001 small mammal results) in the small mammal tissue samples were estimated based on these SRM outliers.
The SRM selected for the 2000 soil analyses was 1944, New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment. This SRM has certified values for 28 of the target PCB congeners. One SRM analysis was submitted, for a total of 28 data points.
Eleven SRM results were outside the ±20% control limit, and also outside the ±25% control limit. Seven of these results were greater than the upper control limit (125% of the 95% confidence interval for an individual congener). The outliers were for each of the following congeners: PCB31/28, PCB52, PCB118, PCB128, PCB138, PCB180, and PCB183. The positive results associated with these SRM outliers were estimated (J) to indicate a potential high bias. Four SRM results (for congeners PCB105, PCB194, PCB195, and PCB206) were less than the lower control limit (75% of the 95% confidence interval). Both positive results and reporting limits associated with these outliers were estimated (J/UJ), indicating a potential low bias for positive results, or a potential that the detection limit may be elevated. For the 2000 analyses, 197 results (11.1% of the total) were qualified based on SRM outliers.
Tables 1A and 1B summarize the small mammal SRM results for this study.
3.5.3 Laboratory Control Samples
The laboratory performed LCS analyses at the required frequency of one for every 15 samples or analytical batch, whichever was more frequent. The ADQO for the LCS analyses is that all %R values must be within the acceptance limits of 75% to 125%; however, if only one analyte %R value is outside the control limits, the laboratory is not required to re-extract the associated samples.
A total of six LCS analyses were submitted with the 2001 small mammal samples. Each LCS included 47 target analytes, for a total of 282 data points (%R values). One LCS %R value was outside the 75% to 125% control limits. The LCS %R value was greater than the upper control limit
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
7
and there were no associated positive results. Reporting limits were judged as unaffected and no action was taken.
Two LCS analyses were submitted with the 2000 analyses. Each LCS included 47 target analytes, for a total of 94 data points (%R values). One LCS %R value was outside the 75% to 125% control limits. The LCS %R value was less than the lower control limit. The associated positive results and reporting limits for non-detected results were estimated (J/UJ) due to the potential low bias. Eighteen data points (1.0% of the total for the 2000 analyses) were qualified based on LCS outliers.
3.5.4 Matrix Spike Samples
The laboratory performed MS analyses at the required frequency of one for every 15 samples or analytical batch. For the 2001 small mammal analyses, a total of six MS analyses were submitted. Each MS sample included 47 spiked analytes, for a total of 282 data points. The ADQO for MS analyses is that all %R values should be within the 50% to 125% control limits. The ADQO does not apply if the concentration in the parent sample is greater than five times the concentration in the spiking solution.
A potential low bias was indicated by 17 of the MS %R values, as the %R values were less than 50% (ranging from 0% to 44%). A potential high bias was indicated by the recoveries for 32 compounds, as the %R values were greater than 125% (ranging from 126% to 1857%).
Positive results associated with an elevated MS %R value were estimated (J) to indicate a potential high bias. No action was taken if the compound was not detected. Target analyte results, both detected and non-detects, associated with MS %R values less than the 50% lower control limit were estimated (J/UJ). One data point (the detection limit for PCB123 in Sample 17-03-101001) was associated with a 0% recovery value in the MS analysis. This data point was rejected (R).
Qualifiers were issued only to the target analyte in the parent sample associated with the MS %R outlier. A total of 45 data points (0.9% of the 2001 small mammal data points) were estimated (J/UJ). One data point (the detection limit for PCB123 in Sample 17-03-101001) was rejected (R) due to a 0% recovery value in the MS analysis.
For the 2000 analyses, one MS was submitted. A spiked sample analysis was not performed for the 2000 shrew analyses due to limited sample volume. For the soil MS, a potential high bias was indicated by the recoveries for six compounds, as the %R values were greater than 125% (ranging from 130% to 149%). These compounds were estimated (J) in the parent sample. One data point (the detection limit for PCB123 in Sample 7-1-B15) was associated with a 0% recovery value in the MS analysis. This data point was rejected (R). Seven data points (0.7% of the 2000 soil data points) were qualified based on MS accuracy outliers.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
8
3.5.5 Internal Standards
Internal standards were added to each field and QC sample prior to injection onto the analytical instrument. The ADQO for internal standards is that the area of the internal standards in each analysis must be within ±50% of the area of the internal standard in the associated CCAL.
For the 2001 small mammal analyses, all internal standard recoveries met the ADQO. For the 2000 analyses, the areas of both internal standards were greater than the upper control limit in two soil samples (7-1-B25 and 7-1-F25). Associated positive results were estimated (J). A total of 87 data points (4.9% of the 2000 analyses total) were qualified based on internal standard outliers.
3.6 Precision
Precision is evaluated through replicate analyses of a sample. For the small mammal study, a SRM and a laboratory duplicate were analyzed with each analytical batch. No field duplicates were submitted. For the 2000 analyses, a laboratory duplicate analysis was not performed for the shrew analyses due to insufficient sample volume. A laboratory duplicate was analyzed with the soils.
Overall, precision was judged as acceptable for all analyses.
3.6.1 Standard Reference Material Analyses
Section 3.5.2 describes the frequency and criteria for the SRM analyses performed with each analytical batch. The results for the small mammal tissue (including the 2000 shrews) SRM analyses are summarized in Tables 1A and 1B.
The average percent difference (%D) from the certified values for the small mammal SRM results ranged from 0.81% to 34% for each of the congeners with values greater than five times the MDL. Most %D values are less than 10%, indicating good overall precision among analytical batches.
3.6.2 Laboratory Duplicate Samples
For samples with positive results greater than or equal to five times the method detection limit (MDL), the AQDO specified relative percent difference (RPD) control limit for laboratory duplicates is 30%. Seven laboratory duplicates (six for the 2001 small mammal analyses, one for the 2000 soil analyses) were submitted.
Table 2 summarizes the results of the laboratory duplicate analyses. For the PCB congeners and homologue groups, a total of ten RPD values (out of 327 possible) were greater than 30%. Six of the RPD outliers were in the laboratory duplicate performed using Sample 21-02-092201 (associated with laboratory batch 0308030), which may indicate matrix effects specific to that sample.
For percent lipids and percent moisture analyses, the RPD control limit is 15%. For percent lipids, two (out of six possible) of the RPD values are greater than 15%.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
9
Target analytes associated with RPD outliers were estimated (J) in the parent sample. A total of 12 data points were estimated due to laboratory precision outliers.
3.7 Reporting Limits and Sample Results
MDLs were determined using low level spikes in tissue from laboratory mice, following procedures outlined in the US Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B).
For the small mammal analyses (including the 2000 shrew analyses), the detection limits for target congeners were generally in the range of 0.02 µg/Kg to 0.22 µg/Kg, with a co-elution of PCB31/28 at 1.38 g/Kg. There were 14 target congeners with MDL values greater than the 0.1 µg/Kg target MDL. The PCB31/28 co-elution MDL value was elevated due to interferences which could not be resolved using the selected method.
For the 2000 soil analyses, the detection limits for target congeners were in the range of 0.010 µg/Kg to 0.160 µg/Kg. There were four target congeners with MDL values greater than the 0.1 µg/Kg target MDL.
The separation and spectral fit for any positive result for the coplanar congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB126, and PCB169) were evaluated. PCB87 was found to interfere with PCB81 and PCB110 was found to interfere with PCB77. The spectra for PCB126 indicates an overall poor spectral fit. There appears to be some interference but the source of the interference could not be determined. The interference does not appear to be a PCB congener. Although not a coplanar congener, interference was also noted for PCB123. PCB149 interferes with the spectra for PCB123.
The spectral match met general identification criteria for these congeners, so the laboratory correctly reported the results as positive results. However, due to the interference, the results may be false positives or may be biased high. The potential interferences cannot be resolved without further extract cleanup (e.g., carbon column cleanup). Thus, all positive results for these congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB123, and PCB126) are qualified as tentatively identified at an estimated concentration (NJ).
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of the other reported congeners. No other instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable. All other reported results were judged to be accurate unless qualified for some other reason.
3.8 Completeness
For the 2001 small mammal analyses, one data point was rejected out of 4980 results reported by the laboratory (83 samples, each with 47 congeners, 10 homologue groups, total PCBs, percent lipids and percent moisture). The completeness level attained for the analysis of the field samples is greater than 99.99%.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
10
For the 2000 analyses, one data point was rejected out of 1770 results reported by the laboratory (30 samples, each with 47 congeners, 10 homologue groups, and total PCBs; percent lipids for the 12 shrew samples; and percent moisture for the 18 soils). The completeness level attained for the analysis of the 2000 samples is greater than 99.94%.
3.9 Summary of Data Usability
For the 2001 small mammal data, a total of 128 out of 4980 results (2.57%) were estimated because of laboratory accuracy and precision outliers. One data point was rejected based on an accuracy outlier. The rejected data point should not be used for any purpose. For all other data, the overall quality of the data is acceptable and all results, as qualified, are considered usable.
For the 2000 analyses data, a total of 333 out of 1770 results (18.8%) were estimated because of laboratory accuracy and precision outliers. One data point was rejected based on an accuracy outlier. The rejected data point should not be used for any purpose. For all other data, the overall quality of the data is acceptable and all results, as qualified, are considered usable.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
11
TABLE 1-A: SUMMARY OF STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS Standard Reference Material 1974b - Organic in Mussel Tissue (Mytilus edulis) Concentrations are ng/g, wet weight
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
12
TABLE 1-B: SUMMARY OF STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL RESULTS: STATISTICAL EVALUATION Standard Reference MateriaL 1974b - Organic in Mussel Tissue (Mytilus edulis) Concentrations are ng/g, wet weight
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative. All deliverables were submitted by the laboratory, with the following exceptions:
• The case narrative was not signed and dated, and second and third pages of the quantitation report for the continuing calibration (CCAL) standard analyzed September 4, 2003 at 10:54 were missing from the data package. The laboratory was contacted, and provided a signed narrative and the missing data. No further action was necessary.
II. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check 2 Standard Reference Material (SRM) Initial Calibration (ICAL) 2 Laboratory Duplicate
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 2 Reporting Limits and Sample Results Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The percent difference (%D) values of PCB123 were outside the control limit of +20% in the two CCAL analyzed September 4, 2003. Only a dilution of Sample 8-07-0091301 was associated with the CCAL. PCB123 was not reported from the dilution. No qualifiers were necessary.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 2
Matrix Spike (MS) Matrix spike analysis was performed using Sample 7-12-091301. Target congeners were present in this sample at concentrations ranging from 1.12 µg/Kg to 508 µg/Kg, with most concentrations greater than 50 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (9.31 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results were masked by the high PCB concentration in the sample.
Results for PCB44, PCB95, PCB149, PCB156, PCB167, PCB177, and PCB183 were estimated (J-8) in the parent sample (7-12-091301) as the %R values were greater than 125%, but the concentrations in the parent sample were less than five times the spike amount. Results for PCB194, PCB195, PCB206, and PCB209 were estimated (J-8) as the %R values were less than the 50% lower control limit.
Although 11 data points were estimated, it is possible that the outliers are due to the overall matrix interference resulting from the high levels of target and non-target congeners present in the sample, and not due to poor analytical technique by the laboratory. As the LCS results were acceptable, only the parent sample was qualified based on MS outliers.
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentrations for PCB74, PCB87, PCB118, PCB138, and PCB180 were greater than the upper control limits of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval].
The recoveries of these compounds were acceptable in the LCS analyses. No trend was noted for these compounds (i.e., the concentrations were acceptable in most of the SRM analyzed with the small mammal samples). The precision for these compounds was acceptable in the laboratory duplicate.
The reported concentrations for PCB87 and PCB118 were within a ±25% acceptance window, and no action was taken.
The reported values for PCB74, PCB138, and PCB180 were greater than 25% of the 95% confidence interval. Values for these congeners were estimated (J-12) in all associated samples.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample 7-12-091301. The relative percent difference (RPD) values for PCB45 (114%) and PCB70 (46%) were greater than the 30% control limit. These concentrations were estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
A positive value for PCB118 was reported in the duplicate, but PCB118 was not detected in the parent sample. The reported value was less than five times the method detection limit (MDL). No action was taken.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 3
Compound Identification The separation and spectral fit for any positive result for the coplanar congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB126, and PCB169) were evaluated. PCB87 was found to interfere with PCB81 and PCB110 was found to interfere with PCB77. The spectra for PCB126 indicates an overall poor spectral fit in Samples 1-17-090801, 1-18-090901, 7-13-091301, 7-16-091401, 8-12-091301, and 8-14-091301. There appears to be some interference, but the source of the interference could not be determined. The interference does not appear to be a PCB congener.
Although not coplanar congeners, interferences were also noted for PCB123 and PCB157. PCB149 interferes with the spectra for PCB123. For PCB157, the peak co-elutes with the non-target PCB PCB200. However, the quantitation ions for PCB157 (a hexachlorobiphenyl) and PCB200 (an octachlorobiphenyl) are sufficiently different that each congener can be resolved despite the co-elution. No action was taken for the PCB157 results.
For all other congeners with interference, the spectral match met general identification criteria for these congeners, so the laboratory correctly reported the results as positive results. However, due to the interference, the results may be false positives or may be biased high. The potential interferences cannot be resolved without further extract cleanup (e.g., carbon column cleanup). Thus, all positive results for these congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB123, and PCB126) should be qualified as tentatively identified at an estimated concentration (NJ-21). PCB congener PCB126 was reported as detected in 14 samples and the result was qualified NJ.
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all other reported congeners. No other instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In Samples 1-18-090901, 1-19-090901, 7-03-091201, 7-06-091201, 8-12-091301, and 8-20-091401, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl homologue group are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 4
calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from 3.7% to 23% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
Eight samples required dilution due to values that exceeded the linear range of the instrument. Both sets of data were reported by the laboratory. In order that only one set of data be reported, values that exceeded the linear range of the instrument were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-20) in the initial analyses and should be reported from the dilutions. The values for all analytes except those that exceeded the linear range in the initial analyses were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-14) in the dilution analyses.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to laboratory duplicate precision outliers and matrix spike and standard reference material percent recovery outliers. Data were qualified as tentatively identified due to potential interference. Data were qualified as do-not-report due to concentrations greater than the linear range of the instrument and the existence of duplicate data.
Data that have been qualified as do-not-report should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check 1 Standard Reference Material (SRM) Initial Calibration (ICAL) 2 Laboratory Duplicate
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 2 Reporting Limits and Sample Results Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The percent difference (%D) values of PCB123 were outside the control limit of +20% in the two CCAL analyzed September 4, 2003. Only a re-extraction of Sample 15-12-091909 was associated with these CCAL, and this analysis was not reported. No qualifiers were necessary.
Matrix Spike (MS) Matrix spike analysis was performed using Sample 16-08-091801. Target congeners were present in this sample at concentrations ranging from 1.42 µg/Kg to 281 µg/Kg, with many concentrations greater than 50 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (9.24 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results are masked by the high PCB concentrations in the sample.
The result for PCB87 was estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the %R value was greater than
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 6
125%, and the parent sample concentration was less than five times the amount spiked. Results for PCB128, PCB158, PCB194, PCB206 and PCB209 were estimated (J-8) as the %R values were less than the lower control limit of 50%.
Although six data points were estimated, it is possible that the outliers are due to the overall matrix interference resulting from the high levels of target and non-target congeners present in the sample, and not due to poor analytical technique by the laboratory. As the LCS results were acceptable, only the parent sample was qualified based on MS outliers.
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentration for PCB49 was greater than the upper control limit of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval].
The recoveries of PCB49 was acceptable in the MS and LCS analyses. No trend was noted (i.e., the concentrations were acceptable in most of the SRM analyzed with the small mammal samples). The precision was acceptable in the laboratory duplicate. The reported concentration for PCB49 was within 25% of the 95% confidence interval, and no action was taken.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample 16-08-091801. The relative percent difference (RPD) value for PCB128 (39%) was greater than the 30% control limit. The concentration was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
Compound Identification The separation and spectral fit for any positive result for the coplanar congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB126, and PCB169) were evaluated. PCB87 was found to interfere with PCB81 and PCB110 was found to interfere with PCB77. The spectra for PCB126 indicates an overall poor spectral fit in Samples 13-03-092201, 13-12-092401, and 16-05-091801. There appears to be some interference, but the source of the interference could not be determined. The interference does not appear to be a PCB congener.
Although not coplanar congeners, interferences were also noted for PCB123 and PCB157. PCB149 interferes with the spectra for PCB123. For PCB157, the peak co-elutes with the non-target PCB PCB200. However, the quantitation ions for PCB157 (a hexachlorobiphenyl) and PCB200 (an octachlorobiphenyl) are sufficiently different that each congener can be resolved despite the co-elution. No action was taken for the PCB157 results.
For all other congeners with interference, the spectral match met general identification criteria for these congeners, so the laboratory correctly reported the results as positive results. However, due to the interference, the results may be false positives or may be biased high. The potential interferences cannot be resolved without further extract cleanup (e.g., carbon column cleanup). Thus, all positive results for these congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB123, and PCB126) should be qualified as
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 7
tentatively identified at an estimated concentration (NJ-21). PCB congener PCB126 was reported as detected in three samples (13-03-092201, 13-12-092401, and 16-05-091801). Results were qualified NJ.
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all other reported congeners. No other instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Calculation Verification The %R value for congeners PCB31/PCB28 in the matrix spike (MS) was calculated incorrectly. The laboratory reported co-eluting congeners PCB31 and PCB28 as a single result. In the recovery calculation, the amount recovered was divided by the concentration of only one congener. As a result, the reported %R exceeded the upper control limit, but the calculated %R value was acceptable.
The laboratory was contacted and submitted a corrected matrix spike recovery form on September 16, 2003. No additional action was necessary.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl homologue group are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 8.2% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 8
Sample 15-12-091901 was re-extracted due to low, but passing, surrogate recoveries. The results from the re-extraction were similar to the initial extraction. As the surrogates for the initial extraction were acceptable the initial analysis was reported. The re-extracted sample results were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-14).
Samples 16-05-091801 and 16-11-091909 required dilution due to values that exceeded the linear range of the instrument. Both sets of data were reported by the laboratory. In order that only one set of data was reported, values that exceeded the linear range of the instrument were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-20) from the initial analyses. The values for all analytes, except those that had exceeded the linear range in the initial analyses, were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-14) in the dilution analyses.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to laboratory duplicate precision outliers and matrix spike percent recovery outliers. Data were qualified as tentatively identified due to potential interference. Data were qualified as do-not-report due to concentrations greater than the linear range of the instrument and the existence of duplicate data.
Data that has been qualified as do-not-report should not be used for any purpose.
All other data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check 1 Standard Reference Material (SRM) Initial Calibration (ICAL) Laboratory Duplicate
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 2 Reporting Limits and Sample Results Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The percent difference (%D) values of PCB123 were outside the control limit of +20% in the CCAL analyzed September 4, 2003 at 10:54, September 5, 2003 at 1:03, and September 5, 2003 at 11:49. All outliers were high, indicating an increase in instrument response. There were no positive results for PCB123. Reporting limits were judged to be unaffected. No action was taken.
Matrix Spike (MS) Matrix spike analysis was performed using Sample 17-03-101001. Target congeners were present in this sample at concentrations ranging from 1.55 µg/Kg to 3874 µg/Kg, with many concentrations greater than 100 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (9.56 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results are masked by the high PCB concentrations in the sample.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 10
Results for PCB95, PCB101, PCB114, PCB128, PCB149, PCB156, PCB158, PCB167, PCB177, PCB183, and PCB201 were estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the %R values were greater than 125%, but the concentrations in the parent sample were less than five times the spike amount. Results for PCB194, PCB206 and PCB209 were estimated (J-8), as the %R values were less than the lower control limit of 50%. The value for PCB123 was rejected (R-8), as the %R value was 0%.
Although 14 data points were estimated and one data point was rejected, it is possible that the outliers are due to the overall matrix interference resulting from the high levels of target and non-target congeners present in the sample, and not due to poor analytical technique by the laboratory. As the LCS results were acceptable, only the parent sample was qualified based on MS outliers.
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentration for PCB49 was greater than the upper control limit of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval].
The recoveries of PCB49 was acceptable in the MS and LCS analyses. No trend was noted (i.e., the concentrations were acceptable in most of the SRM analyzed with the small mammal samples). The precision was acceptable in the laboratory duplicate. The reported concentration for PCB49 was within 25% of the 95% confidence interval, and no action was taken.
Compound Identification The separation and spectral fit for any positive result for the coplanar congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB126, and PCB169) were evaluated. PCB87 was found to interfere with PCB81 and PCB110 was found to interfere with PCB77.
Although not coplanar congeners, interferences were also noted for PCB123 and PCB157. PCB149 interferes with the spectra for PCB123. For PCB157, the peak co-elutes with the non-target PCB PCB200. However, the quantitation ions for PCB157 (a hexachlorobiphenyl) and PCB200 (an octachlorobiphenyl) are sufficiently different that each congener can be resolved despite the co-elution. No action was taken for the PCB157 results.
For all other congeners with interference, the spectral match met general identification criteria for these congeners, so the laboratory correctly reported the results as positive results. However, due to the interference, the results may be false positives or may be biased high. The potential interferences cannot be resolved without further extract cleanup (e.g., carbon column cleanup). Thus, all positive results for these congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB123, and PCB126) should be qualified as tentatively identified at an estimated concentration (NJ-21). PCB congener PCB126 was reported as detected in three samples (16-13-091901, 16-17-092001, and 16-18-092001). Results were qualified NJ.
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all other reported congeners. No other instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 11
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl homologue group are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from 2.0% to 8.7% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
Seven samples required dilution due to values greater than the linear range of the instrument. Both sets of data were reported by the laboratory. In order that only one set of data was reported, values that exceeded the linear range of the instrument were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-20) from the initial analyses. The values for all analytes, except those that had exceeded the linear range in the initial analyses, were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-14) in the dilution analyses.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to matrix spike percent recovery outliers. Data were qualified as tentatively identified due to potential interference. Data were qualified as do-not-report due to concentrations greater than the linear range of the instrument and the existence of duplicate data. Data were rejected due to a matrix spike percent recovery outlier.
Data that has been rejected or qualified as do-not-report should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 1 Reporting Limits and Sample Results Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Matrix Spike (MS) Matrix spike analysis was performed using Sample 21-02-092201. Target congeners were present in this sample at concentrations ranging from 1.55 µg/Kg to 3874 µg/Kg, with many concentrations greater than 100 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (9.56 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results are masked by the high PCB concentrations in the sample.
The result for PCB70 was estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the %R value was greater than 125%, but the concentration in the parent sample was less than five times the spike amount. Results for PCB194, PCB206 and PCB209 were estimated (J-8), as the %R values were less than the lower control limit of 50%.
Although four data points were estimated, it is possible that the outliers are due to the overall matrix interference resulting from the high levels of target and non-target congeners present in the sample,
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 13
and not due to poor analytical technique by the laboratory. As the LCS results were acceptable, only the parent sample was qualified based on MS outliers.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample 21-02-092201. The relative percent difference (RPD) values for PCB31/28, PCB95, PCB110, PCB128, PCB195, and the trichlorobiphenyl homologue group were greater than the 30% control limit. These concentrations were estimated (J-9) in the parent sample
The RPD value for the percent lipids determination was greater than the control limit of 15%, at 19%. The lipids result was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
Compound Identification Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all reported congeners. No instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Calculation Verification The laboratory reported the percent total solids value as the percent moisture value. The laboratory was contacted September 23, 2003 and requested to re-submit the percent moisture data. The corrected data was received September 24, 2003. No additional action was necessary.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl homologue group are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 100.4% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level).
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 14
The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 3.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to matrix spike percent recovery and laboratory precision outliers.
All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew and mouse) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check 1 Standard Reference Material (SRM) Initial Calibration (ICAL) 2 Laboratory Duplicate
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 1 Reporting Limits and Sample Results Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The percent difference (%D) value of PCB123 was outside the control limit of +20% in the CCAL analyzed on September 10, 2003. Only the method blank, laboratory control sample (LCS), and standard reference material (SRM) were associated with this CCAL. No qualifiers were necessary.
Matrix Spike (MS) Matrix spike analysis was performed using Sample “Comp of Sta 1”. The result for PCB87 was estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the %R value was greater than 125%. The %R value for PCB189 was also greater than 125%; however, PCB189 was not detected in the parent sample. As the recovery indicates a potential high bias, reporting limits are not affected and no action was taken.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 16
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentrations for PCB31/28 and PCB138 were greater than the upper control limit of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval].
The recoveries of these compounds were acceptable in the MS and LCS analyses. No trend was noted for these compounds (i.e., the concentrations were acceptable in most of the SRM analyzed with the small mammal samples). The precision for these compounds was acceptable in the laboratory duplicate. The reported concentrations for PCB31/28 and PCB138 were within 25% of the 95% confidence interval, and no action was taken.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample “Comp of Sta 1”. All congener relative percent difference (RPD) values were within the 30% control limit.
The RPD value for the percent lipids determination was greater than the control limit of 15%, at 22%. The lipids result was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample.
Compound Identification Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all reported congeners. No instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl or octachlorobiphenyl homologue groups are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl and octachlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 28.5% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 17
calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1.5%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
One data point was estimated due to a matrix spike percent recovery outlier, and one data point was estimated based on a laboratory duplicate precision outlier.
All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (mouse and vole) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
2 Matrix Spike (MS) 1 Reporting Limits and Sample Results 1 Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) EDD Transcription Check
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Matrix Spike (MS) MS analysis was performed using Sample “Comp of Sta 20” (laboratory ID 0308032-02). The percent recovery (%R) values for PCB31/28, PCB99, PCB105, PCB118, PCB138, PCB153, PCB167, PCB170, BZ189, and PCB201 were greater than the upper control limit of 125%. The results for these congeners, except PCB189, were estimated (J-8) in the parent sample. PCB189 was not detected in the parent sample. As the recovery indicates a potential high bias, reporting limits are not affected and no action was taken.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The %R value for PCB189 was greater than the upper control limit of 125% in the laboratory control (LCS) sample associated with this SDG. There were no positive results for PCB189 in the samples, and reporting limits were judged to be unaffected. No action was taken.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 19
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentration for PCB158 was below than the lower control limit of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval]. The reported value for PCB158 was also less than 25% of the 95% confidence interval. Positive values and/or reporting limits for PCB158 were estimated (J/UJ-12) in all samples.
The certified value of PCB170 in the SRM is less than five times the MDL established by the laboratory for this congener. The control limits do not apply, and no action was taken.
Compound Identification Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all reported congeners. No instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results
For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the trichlorobiphenyl or octachlorobiphenyl homologue groups are less than the sum of the individual trichlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the trichlorobiphenyl and octachlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 22.8% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 3.0%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
Note that the effect of naming samples as “Comp of Sta 20” (mouse composite, laboratory ID 0308032-02) and “Comp of Sta 20” (meadow vole composite, laboratory ID 0308032-08) produces a duplicate sample name, which may be confusing when the laboratory ID is not present.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 20
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exceptions noted above.
Data were estimated due to matrix spike percent recovery and standard reference material recovery outliers. All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 21
DATA VALIDATION REPORT - SUMMARY (LEVEL III) REVIEW Hudson River Soil Samples from 2000 Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners
SDG: 0309086 Woods Hole Group
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of soil samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Initial Calibration (ICAL) The ADQO specification for the initial calibration is that a minimum of a five point calibration would be performed for all analytes, and that the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) values for all analytes are less than 20%; however, up to 10% of the analyte %RSD values can be greater than 20% provided that all %RSD values are less than 30%. All ICAL met the ADQO.
The %RSD values of PCB81 (at 21.8%), PCB167 (at 20.5%), and PCB169 (at 20.8%) were greater than the control limit of 20% in the ICAL performed November 4, 2003. Positive values for these analytes were estimated (J-5A) in the associated field samples. The reporting limits for non-detected analytes were not significantly affected, so no further action was taken.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 22
Continuing Calibration (CCAL) The ADQO specified for the continuing (or daily) calibrations is that a CCAL must be analyzed at the beginning and end of each analytical sequence (or every twelve hours, whichever is more frequent), and that all percent difference (%D) values must be less than 20%. However, up to 10% of the analyte %D values can be greater than 20% provided that all %D values are less than 30%. All CCAL met the ADQO.
The %D value for PCB123 (at 23.5%) was greater than the control limit of 20% in the CCAL analyzed November 5, 2003 at 10:49. The %D value for PCB126 (at 21.9%) was greater than the control limit in the CCAL analyzed November 5, 2003 at 14:28. The %D values for PCB194, PCB206, and PCB209 were greater than the control limit in the CCAL analyzed November 19, 2003 at 22:01.
Positive values and/or reporting limits for the above congeners were estimated (J/UJ-5B) in the associated field samples.
Matrix Spike (MS) MS analysis was performed using Sample 7-1-B15. Forty-three of the 47 target congeners were present in this sample, at concentrations ranging from 1.52 µg/Kg to 5290 µg/Kg, with the concentrations for 27 congeners greater than 100 µg/Kg. If the concentration of the congener in the parent sample was greater than five times the spike concentration (10.3 µg/Kg), no qualifiers were assigned because the recovery results are masked by the high PCB concentrations in the sample.
The results for PCB167, PCB183, PCB189, PCB194, PCB195, and PCB206 were estimated (J-8) in the parent sample as the %R values were greater than 125%, but the concentrations in the parent sample were less than five times the spike amount. The reporting limit for PCB123 was rejected (R-8) in the parent sample as this analyte was not detected in either the parent sample or the MS.
Although seven data points were qualified, it is possible that the outliers are due to the overall matrix interference resulting from the high levels of target and non-target congeners present in the sample, and not due to poor analytical technique by the laboratory. As the LCS results were acceptable for these compounds, only the parent sample was qualified based on MS outliers.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) The %R value for PCB18 was less than the 75% lower control limit (at 74%) in the LCS analysis associated with this SDG. Due to the potential low bias, positive values and or reporting limits for PCB18 were estimated (J/UJ-10) in the field samples.
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The laboratory analyzed SRM1944, New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment. This SRM has certified values for 28 of the target PCB congeners. The reported concentration for 11 of the 28 target analytes with certified values were outside the acceptance window [±20% of the 95%
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 23
confidence interval]. The reported values for these analytes were also outside a wider acceptance window of ±25% of the 95% confidence interval.
The reported values for PCB105, PCB194, PCB195, and PCB206 were less than 25% of the 95% confidence interval. Positive values and/or reporting limits for these analytes were estimated (J/UJ-12) in all samples.
The reported values for PCB31/28, PCB52, PCB118, PCB128, PCB138, PCB180, and PCB183 were greater than 25% of the 95% confidence interval. Positive values for these analytes were estimated (J-12) in all samples.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was performed on Sample 8-1-A15. The relative percent difference (RPD) value for PCB8 (at 31%) was greater than the 30% control limit. The concentration for this analyte was estimated (J-9) in the parent sample
Internal Standards The recoveries of both the 13C-PCB15 and 13C-PCB180 internal standards in Samples 7-1-B25, 7-1-F25 and the LCS were greater than the upper control limit of 150% of the area of the respective internal standard in the associated CCAL. Positive values were estimated (J-19) in the field samples.
Compound Identification The separation and spectral fit for any positive result for the coplanar congeners (PCB77, PCB81, PCB126, and PCB169) were evaluated. PCB87 was found to interfere with PCB81 and PCB110 was found to interfere with PCB77. The spectra for PCB126 indicates an overall poor spectral fit in Sample 7-1-C15. There appears to be some interference, but the source of the interference could not be determined. The interference does not appear to be a PCB congener.
For all other congeners with interference, the spectral match met general identification criteria for these congeners, so the laboratory correctly reported the results as positive results. However, due to the interference, the results may be false positives or may be biased high. The potential interferences cannot be resolved without further extract cleanup (e.g., carbon column cleanup). Thus, all positive results for these congeners (PCB77 in 18 samples, PCB81 in two samples, and PCB126 in Sample 7-1-C15) were qualified as tentatively identified at an estimated concentration (NJ-21).
Chromatography and mass spectral identification were reviewed for a minimum of 10% of all other reported congeners. No other instances of potential interference were noted. All reported positive results met the identification criteria and chromatographic peak shapes were acceptable.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 24
concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In several samples, the values reported for the heptachlorobiphenyl homologue groups are less than the sum of the individual heptachlorobiphenyl congeners reported. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. For example, for the heptachlorobiphenyl results, the differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 12.4% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
A majority of the samples were reported from a diluted analysis due to the high levels of the target analytes present. Reporting limits were raised accordingly.
Sample 7-1-A15 was reported twice, once at a 20X dilution and once at a 40X dilution, due to the value for PCB52 being greater than the linear range of the calibration in the 20X analysis. In order that only one set of data be reported, the value for PCB52 was qualified as do-not-report (DNR-20) in the 20X analysis. All values, except that of PCB52, were qualified as do-not-report (DNR-14) in the 40X analysis.
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), standard reference material (SRM), and matrix spike (MS) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the relative percent difference values for the duplicate analyses, with the exception noted above.
Data were estimated due to LCS and MS percent recovery outliers, standard reference material and internal standard recovery outliers, laboratory duplicate precision outliers, initial calibration RSD outliers, and continuing calibration percent difference outliers. Data were rejected due to a MS percent recovery outlier.
Data that has been rejected or qualified as do-not-report should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 25
DATA VALIDATION REPORT - SUMMARY (LEVEL III) REVIEW Hudson River Shrew Tissue from 2000
This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of small mammal (shrew) tissue samples and the associated laboratory quality control samples. Samples were analyzed by Woods Hole Group Environmental Laboratories, Raynham, Massachusetts. Refer to the Sample Index for a list of the samples reviewed.
I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS
All required deliverables were submitted by the laboratory. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes, and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative. Due to limited sample volume, percent moisture analyses were not performed.
II. Technical Data Validation
The quality control (QC) requirements that were reviewed are listed below.
___________________________________________________________ 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.
Matrix Spike (MS) MS analysis was not performed due to insufficient sample volume. Accuracy was evaluated using the LCS analysis and the surrogate compounds in each sample.
Standard Reference Material (SRM) The reported concentrations for PCB49 and PCB158 were below than the lower control limit of the acceptance window [±20% of the 95% confidence interval]. The reported concentration for PCB138 was greater than the upper control limit of the acceptance window.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 26
The reported values for these congeners were acceptable in the LCS, and no action was taken unless the reported values were outside a wider acceptance window of ±25% of the 95% confidence interval. The reported values were within ±25% of the 95% confidence interval. No data were qualified.
Laboratory Duplicate A laboratory duplicate was not performed due to insufficient sample volume. Laboratory precision could not be assessed.
Reporting Limits and Sample Results For GCMS-SIM analysis, response factors are generated for each congener during the calibration process. The relative area of a peak is divided by the appropriate response factor to calculate the concentration of the congener. For the homologue groups (monochlorobiphenyl, dichlorobiphenyl, etc.), a representative response factor is used. For example, the response factor for PCB29 is used as the representative response factor for all trichlorobiphenyls.
In most samples, the values reported for one or more homologue groups are less than the sum of the individual congeners reported from that chlorination level. This occurs because the representative response factor is sufficiently different from the target congener response factors generated during the calibration. For example, the response factor for the PCB31/28 co-elution (detected in most samples) is lower than the trichlorobiphenyl representative response factor. Since the areas are divided by the response factors, this results in a lower concentration for the total trichlorobiphenyls, even if PCB31/28 is the only detected congener in the chlorination level.
Unless all 209 congeners are calibrated, any reported total for a chlorination level will have some inherent variability. The differences between the calculated (by summing the congeners) and reported results range from less than 1% to 78.7% (higher percentages are associated with concentrations near or less than the lower calibration level). The differences for the Total Homologue values are all less than 1%. This is within the variability of the method, thus no action was taken.
Sample 01-01-09100-10-S-STS was reported twice due to a PCB138 concentration that was greater than the linear range of the calibration in the initial analysis. In order that only one set of data be reported, the value for PCB138 was qualified do-not-report (DNR-20) in the initial analysis and should be reported from the dilution. All values, except that of PCB138, were qualified do-not-report (DNR-14) in the dilution analysis.
Several samples were analyzed as dilutions due to the high levels of target analytes present. Reporting limits were raised accordingly.
Data Quality Assessment 2001 Small Mammal and 2000 Shrew/Soils
Version 1.1 February 19, 2004
B - 27
III Overall Assessment
As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate, laboratory control sample (LCS), and standard reference material (SRM) percent recovery values, with the exceptions noted above. Precision not evaluated.
Data that has been qualified do-not-report should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as reported, are acceptable for use.
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX D
EARTHWORM (2000) AND WOODCOCK LIVER (2001)DATA SHEETS
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 1 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 2 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 3 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 4 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 5 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 6 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 7 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 8 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 9 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 10 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 11 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 12 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 13 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 14 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 15 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 16 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 17 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 18 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 19 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 20 of 21
Earthworm Tissue and Woodcock Liver Tissue Data Table Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 21 of 21
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX E
SMALL MAMMAL (2001) TISSUE DATA SHEETS
E1: SHORT-TAILED SHREW TISSUE DATA SHEETS
E2: MOUSE TISSUE DATA SHEETS
E3: MEADOW VOLE TISSUE DATA SHEETS
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
VALUE, INTERPRETIVE QUALIFIER2 AND UNITS3 DETECTION LIMIT3
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 1 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 2 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 3 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 4 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 5 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 6 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 7 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 8 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 9 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 10 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 11 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 12 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 13 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 14 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 15 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 16 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 17 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 18 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 19 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 20 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 21 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 22 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 23 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 24 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 25 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 26 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 27 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 28 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 29 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 30 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 31 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 32 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 33 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 34 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 35 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 36 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 37 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 38 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 39 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 40 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 41 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 42 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 43 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 44 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 45 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 46 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 47 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 48 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 49 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 50 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 51 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 52 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 53 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 54 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 55 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 56 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 57 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 58 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 59 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 60 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 61 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 62 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 63 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 64 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 65 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 66 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 67 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 68 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 69 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 70 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 71 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 72 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 73 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 74 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 75 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 76 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 77 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 78 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 79 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 80 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 81 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 82 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 83 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 84 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 85 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 86 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 87 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 88 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 89 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 90 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 91 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 92 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 93 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 94 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 95 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 96 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 97 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 98 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 99 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 100 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 101 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 102 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 103 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 104 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 105 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 106 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 107 of 108
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 108 of 108
9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl2-BZ#8 0.130 U µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl3-BZ#18 0.289 U µg/Kg 0.289 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 5.22 J µg/Kg 2.08 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#44 0.212 J µg/Kg 0.198 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#45 0.265 U µg/Kg 0.265 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#47 3.69 µg/Kg 0.336 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#49 0.606 J µg/Kg 0.165 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#52 1.01 µg/Kg 0.188 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#56 1.76 µg/Kg 0.0984 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#66 1.63 µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#70 0.961 µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#74 2.70 µg/Kg 0.203 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#77 0.182 U µg/Kg 0.182 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl4-BZ#81 0.180 U µg/Kg 0.180 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#87 3.43 J µg/Kg 0.0802 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#95 0.250 J µg/Kg 0.0621 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#99 15.0 µg/Kg 0.0424 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#101 1.72 µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#105 7.71 µg/Kg 0.0590 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#110 0.500 J µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#114 0.553 µg/Kg 0.0530 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#118 16.2 µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#123 0.105 U µg/Kg 0.105 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0924 U µg/Kg 0.0924 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#128 1.17 µg/Kg 0.0833 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#138 42.1 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#146 4.00 µg/Kg 0.0757 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#149 1.15 µg/Kg 0.0969 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#151 0.212 J µg/Kg 0.161 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#153 28.5 µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#156 4.00 µg/Kg 0.0984 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#157 0.643 µg/Kg 0.0772 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#158 0.961 µg/Kg 0.0651 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#167 0.522 µg/Kg 0.0833 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl6-BZ#169 0.268 U µg/Kg 0.268 µg/Kg
VALUE, INTERPRETIVE QUALIFIER2 AND
UNITS3 DETECTION LIMIT3
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 1 of 33
9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#170 4.63 µg/Kg 0.312 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0908 J µg/Kg 0.0636 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#177 0.863 µg/Kg 0.0893 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#180 5.34 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#183 0.681 µg/Kg 0.0606 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#187 10.0 µg/Kg 0.0666 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl7-BZ#189 0.120 U µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl8-BZ#194 1.10 µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl8-BZ#195 0.386 J µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl8-BZ#201 3.22 µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl9-BZ#206 0.931 µg/Kg 0.162 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Cl10-BZ#209 0.182 J µg/Kg 0.0757 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.45 U µg/Kg 4.45 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.130 U µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Trichlorobiphenyls 5.12 µg/Kg 0.447 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 20.9 µg/Kg 0.0696 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Pentachlorobiphenyls 76.9 µg/Kg 0.0802 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Hexachlorobiphenyls 92.7 µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Heptachlorobiphenyls 22.8 µg/Kg 0.0696 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Octachlorobiphenyls 4.31 µg/Kg 0.0636 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Nonachlorobiphenyls 5.33 µg/Kg 0.162 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.182 J µg/Kg 0.0757 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Total Homologs 228 µg/Kg 0.0757 µg/Kg9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Percent Lipids 4.8 J % 0.1 %9/7/2001 Comp of Sta 1 611675 4758823 1 0308031-02 Percent Moisture 71.3 % 0.1 %9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl2-BZ#8 0.117 U µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl3-BZ#18 0.261 U µg/Kg 0.261 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 1.88 U µg/Kg 1.88 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#44 0.179 U µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#45 0.239 U µg/Kg 0.239 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#47 0.444 J µg/Kg 0.303 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#49 0.149 U µg/Kg 0.149 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#52 0.252 J µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#56 0.0887 U µg/Kg 0.0887 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#66 0.328 J µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 2 of 33
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#70 0.104 U µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#74 0.184 J µg/Kg 0.183 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#77 0.164 U µg/Kg 0.164 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl4-BZ#81 0.162 U µg/Kg 0.162 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#87 0.307 J µg/Kg 0.0723 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0560 U µg/Kg 0.0560 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#99 0.682 µg/Kg 0.0382 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#101 0.184 J µg/Kg 0.109 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#105 0.341 µg/Kg 0.0532 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#110 0.104 U µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0478 U µg/Kg 0.0478 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#118 0.853 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#123 0.0942 U µg/Kg 0.0942 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0833 U µg/Kg 0.0833 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#128 0.0751 U µg/Kg 0.0751 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#138 1.67 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#146 0.246 J µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#149 0.0873 U µg/Kg 0.0873 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#151 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#153 1.69 µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#156 0.266 J µg/Kg 0.0887 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#157 0.0696 U µg/Kg 0.0696 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0587 U µg/Kg 0.0587 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#167 0.0751 U µg/Kg 0.0751 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl6-BZ#169 0.242 U µg/Kg 0.242 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#170 1.02 J µg/Kg 0.281 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0573 U µg/Kg 0.0573 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#177 0.109 J µg/Kg 0.0805 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#180 1.10 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#183 0.116 J µg/Kg 0.0546 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#187 0.594 µg/Kg 0.0601 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl7-BZ#189 0.108 U µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl8-BZ#194 0.341 J µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl8-BZ#195 0.124 U µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl8-BZ#201 0.566 µg/Kg 0.109 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 3 of 33
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl9-BZ#206 0.146 U µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Cl10-BZ#209 0.0682 U µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.01 U µg/Kg 4.01 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.117 U µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Trichlorobiphenyls 1.26 J µg/Kg 0.403 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 3.46 µg/Kg 0.0628 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Pentachlorobiphenyls 4.61 µg/Kg 0.0723 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Hexachlorobiphenyls 4.61 µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Heptachlorobiphenyls 3.64 µg/Kg 0.0628 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Octachlorobiphenyls 0.914 µg/Kg 0.0573 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Nonachlorobiphenyls 0.146 U µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.0682 U µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Total Homologs 18.5 µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Percent Lipids 1.2 % 0.1 %9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 3 613916 4762429 3 0308031-03 Percent Moisture 71.5 % 0.1 %
9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl2-BZ#8 0.140 U µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl3-BZ#18 0.310 U µg/Kg 0.310 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 4.20 J µg/Kg 2.24 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#44 0.213 U µg/Kg 0.213 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#45 0.284 U µg/Kg 0.284 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#47 2.88 µg/Kg 0.361 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#49 0.552 J µg/Kg 0.177 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#52 1.15 µg/Kg 0.201 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#56 2.35 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#66 3.48 µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#70 0.503 J µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#74 5.57 µg/Kg 0.218 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#77 0.195 U µg/Kg 0.195 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl4-BZ#81 0.193 U µg/Kg 0.193 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#87 2.75 µg/Kg 0.0861 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#95 0.211 J µg/Kg 0.0666 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#99 9.61 µg/Kg 0.0455 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#101 1.32 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#105 9.65 µg/Kg 0.0633 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#110 0.123 U µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 4 of 33
9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#114 0.731 µg/Kg 0.0568 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#118 20.0 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#123 0.112 U µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0991 U µg/Kg 0.0991 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#128 0.885 µg/Kg 0.0893 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#138 16.6 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#146 2.13 µg/Kg 0.0812 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#149 0.300 J µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#151 0.308 J µg/Kg 0.172 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#153 16.5 µg/Kg 0.148 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#156 2.72 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#157 0.430 µg/Kg 0.0828 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#158 0.503 µg/Kg 0.0698 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#167 0.593 µg/Kg 0.0893 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl6-BZ#169 0.287 U µg/Kg 0.287 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#170 2.94 µg/Kg 0.335 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0682 U µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#177 0.438 J µg/Kg 0.0958 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#180 3.73 µg/Kg 0.143 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#183 0.341 µg/Kg 0.0650 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#187 4.29 µg/Kg 0.0715 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl7-BZ#189 0.128 U µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl8-BZ#194 0.820 µg/Kg 0.149 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl8-BZ#195 0.235 J µg/Kg 0.148 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl8-BZ#201 1.84 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl9-BZ#206 0.625 J µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Cl10-BZ#209 0.130 J µg/Kg 0.0812 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.77 U µg/Kg 4.77 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.140 U µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Trichlorobiphenyls 4.21 µg/Kg 0.479 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 23.5 µg/Kg 0.0747 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Pentachlorobiphenyls 75.4 µg/Kg 0.0861 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Hexachlorobiphenyls 44.9 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Heptachlorobiphenyls 12.1 µg/Kg 0.0747 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Octachlorobiphenyls 3.04 µg/Kg 0.0682 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 5 of 33
9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Nonachlorobiphenyls 6.69 µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.130 J µg/Kg 0.0812 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Total Homologs 170 µg/Kg 0.0812 µg/Kg9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Percent Lipids 2.6 % 0.1 %9/12/2001 Comp of Sta 4 614689 4765951 4 0308031-04 Percent Moisture 70.9 % 0.1 %9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl2-BZ#8 0.139 U µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl3-BZ#18 0.309 U µg/Kg 0.309 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 7.44 J µg/Kg 2.23 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#44 1.68 µg/Kg 0.212 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#45 0.283 U µg/Kg 0.283 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#47 6.68 µg/Kg 0.359 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#49 2.39 µg/Kg 0.176 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#52 4.27 µg/Kg 0.201 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#56 3.81 µg/Kg 0.105 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#66 7.23 µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#70 2.52 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#74 7.53 µg/Kg 0.217 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#77 0.194 U µg/Kg 0.194 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl4-BZ#81 0.192 U µg/Kg 0.192 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#87 3.16 µg/Kg 0.0857 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#95 1.12 µg/Kg 0.0663 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#99 11.4 µg/Kg 0.0453 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#101 2.90 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#105 7.33 µg/Kg 0.0631 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#110 1.88 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#114 0.469 µg/Kg 0.0566 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#118 14.0 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#123 0.112 U µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0987 U µg/Kg 0.0987 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#128 0.817 µg/Kg 0.0890 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#138 15.6 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#146 1.67 µg/Kg 0.0809 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#149 1.34 µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#151 0.388 J µg/Kg 0.171 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#153 14.2 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 6 of 33
9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#156 2.18 µg/Kg 0.105 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#157 0.364 J µg/Kg 0.0825 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#158 0.332 J µg/Kg 0.0696 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#167 0.356 J µg/Kg 0.0890 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl6-BZ#169 0.286 U µg/Kg 0.286 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#170 3.24 µg/Kg 0.333 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#174 0.113 J µg/Kg 0.0679 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#177 0.324 J µg/Kg 0.0955 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#180 5.09 µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#183 0.510 µg/Kg 0.0647 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#187 5.77 µg/Kg 0.0712 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl7-BZ#189 0.128 U µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl8-BZ#194 1.48 µg/Kg 0.149 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl8-BZ#195 0.421 J µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl8-BZ#201 2.79 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl9-BZ#206 1.81 µg/Kg 0.173 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Cl10-BZ#209 0.251 J µg/Kg 0.0809 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.76 U µg/Kg 4.76 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.139 U µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Trichlorobiphenyls 6.79 µg/Kg 0.477 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 46.9 µg/Kg 0.0744 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Pentachlorobiphenyls 69.2 µg/Kg 0.0857 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Hexachlorobiphenyls 43.2 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Heptachlorobiphenyls 14.6 µg/Kg 0.0744 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Octachlorobiphenyls 5.36 µg/Kg 0.0679 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Nonachlorobiphenyls 8.15 µg/Kg 0.173 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.251 J µg/Kg 0.0809 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Total Homologs 194 µg/Kg 0.0809 µg/Kg9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Percent Lipids 2.6 % 0.1 %9/6/2001 Comp of Sta 5 615971 4768359 5 0308031-05 Percent Moisture 73.5 % 0.1 %9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl2-BZ#8 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl3-BZ#18 0.322 U µg/Kg 0.322 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 6.92 J µg/Kg 2.32 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#44 0.886 J µg/Kg 0.221 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#45 0.295 U µg/Kg 0.295 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 7 of 33
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#47 7.21 µg/Kg 0.375 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#49 2.09 µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#52 3.92 µg/Kg 0.209 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#56 3.91 µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#66 5.72 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#70 1.39 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#74 8.18 µg/Kg 0.226 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#77 0.203 U µg/Kg 0.203 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl4-BZ#81 0.201 U µg/Kg 0.201 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#87 6.98 µg/Kg 0.0894 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#95 0.675 µg/Kg 0.0692 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#99 30.6 µg/Kg 0.0473 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#101 5.07 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#105 15.8 µg/Kg 0.0658 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#110 1.43 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#114 1.37 µg/Kg 0.0591 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#118 43.8 µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#123 0.116 U µg/Kg 0.116 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl5-BZ#126 0.103 U µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#128 2.70 µg/Kg 0.0928 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#138 53.7 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#146 8.48 µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#149 2.02 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#151 0.304 J µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#153 73.1 µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#156 9.48 µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#157 1.61 µg/Kg 0.0861 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#158 1.07 µg/Kg 0.0726 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#167 1.60 µg/Kg 0.0928 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl6-BZ#169 0.299 U µg/Kg 0.299 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#170 9.21 µg/Kg 0.348 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#174 0.135 J µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#177 1.14 µg/Kg 0.0996 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#180 22.3 µg/Kg 0.148 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#183 2.27 µg/Kg 0.0675 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 8 of 33
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#187 18.0 µg/Kg 0.0743 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl7-BZ#189 0.133 U µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl8-BZ#194 4.44 µg/Kg 0.155 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl8-BZ#195 0.683 J µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl8-BZ#201 4.64 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl9-BZ#206 2.38 µg/Kg 0.181 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Cl10-BZ#209 0.354 J µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.96 U µg/Kg 4.96 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Trichlorobiphenyls 7.12 µg/Kg 0.498 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 43.1 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Pentachlorobiphenyls 172 µg/Kg 0.0894 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Hexachlorobiphenyls 167 µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Heptachlorobiphenyls 51.3 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Octachlorobiphenyls 11.0 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Nonachlorobiphenyls 7.89 µg/Kg 0.181 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.354 J µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Total Homologs 460 µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Percent Lipids 2.0 % 0.1 %9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 6 615670 4772192 6 0308031-06 Percent Moisture 76.1 % 0.1 %
9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl2-BZ#8 0.158 U µg/Kg 0.158 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl3-BZ#18 0.351 U µg/Kg 0.351 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 6.31 J µg/Kg 2.53 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#44 1.23 µg/Kg 0.241 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#45 0.377 J µg/Kg 0.322 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#47 3.00 µg/Kg 0.408 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#49 1.75 µg/Kg 0.200 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#52 2.53 µg/Kg 0.228 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#56 1.93 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#66 2.59 µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#70 1.20 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#74 4.38 µg/Kg 0.247 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#77 0.221 U µg/Kg 0.221 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl4-BZ#81 0.219 U µg/Kg 0.219 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#87 2.13 µg/Kg 0.0975 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 9 of 33
9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#95 0.506 µg/Kg 0.0754 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#99 8.30 µg/Kg 0.0515 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#101 1.29 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#105 3.94 µg/Kg 0.0717 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#110 0.368 J µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#114 0.350 µg/Kg 0.0644 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#118 11.3 µg/Kg 0.151 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#123 0.127 U µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl5-BZ#126 0.112 U µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#128 0.405 J µg/Kg 0.101 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#138 16.4 µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#146 2.15 µg/Kg 0.0920 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#149 0.303 J µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#151 0.195 U µg/Kg 0.195 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#153 28.6 µg/Kg 0.167 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#156 3.78 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#157 0.598 µg/Kg 0.0938 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#158 0.248 J µg/Kg 0.0791 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#167 0.396 J µg/Kg 0.101 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl6-BZ#169 0.326 U µg/Kg 0.326 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#170 4.11 µg/Kg 0.379 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0773 U µg/Kg 0.0773 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#177 0.285 J µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#180 8.75 µg/Kg 0.162 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#183 0.451 µg/Kg 0.0736 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#187 5.01 µg/Kg 0.0809 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl7-BZ#189 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl8-BZ#194 2.07 µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl8-BZ#195 0.248 J µg/Kg 0.167 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl8-BZ#201 2.19 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl9-BZ#206 1.00 µg/Kg 0.197 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Cl10-BZ#209 0.166 J µg/Kg 0.0920 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Monochlorobiphenyls 5.41 U µg/Kg 5.41 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.158 U µg/Kg 0.158 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Trichlorobiphenyls 4.91 µg/Kg 0.543 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 10 of 33
9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 27.6 µg/Kg 0.0846 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Pentachlorobiphenyls 48.8 µg/Kg 0.0975 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Hexachlorobiphenyls 56.8 µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Heptachlorobiphenyls 17.4 µg/Kg 0.0846 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Octachlorobiphenyls 4.86 µg/Kg 0.0773 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Nonachlorobiphenyls 5.82 µg/Kg 0.197 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.166 J µg/Kg 0.0920 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Total Homologs 166 µg/Kg 0.0920 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Percent Lipids 2.4 % 0.1 %9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 7 614704 4781156 7 0308031-07 Percent Moisture 70.5 % 0.1 %9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl2-BZ#8 0.133 U µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl3-BZ#18 0.295 U µg/Kg 0.295 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 10.8 µg/Kg 2.12 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#44 2.32 µg/Kg 0.202 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#45 0.386 J µg/Kg 0.270 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#47 9.27 µg/Kg 0.342 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#49 3.93 µg/Kg 0.168 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#52 5.58 µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#56 6.30 µg/Kg 0.100 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#66 8.69 µg/Kg 0.134 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#70 4.06 µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#74 11.1 µg/Kg 0.207 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#77 0.185 U µg/Kg 0.185 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl4-BZ#81 0.184 U µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#87 4.31 µg/Kg 0.0817 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#95 1.26 µg/Kg 0.0632 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#99 11.1 µg/Kg 0.0432 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#101 3.69 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#105 7.34 µg/Kg 0.0602 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#110 2.13 µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#114 0.601 µg/Kg 0.0540 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#118 14.5 µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#123 0.106 U µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0941 U µg/Kg 0.0941 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#128 0.779 µg/Kg 0.0848 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 11 of 33
9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#138 13.1 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#146 1.61 µg/Kg 0.0771 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#149 0.941 µg/Kg 0.0987 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#151 0.216 J µg/Kg 0.163 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#153 12.7 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#156 1.90 µg/Kg 0.100 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#157 0.324 J µg/Kg 0.0787 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#158 0.347 µg/Kg 0.0663 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#167 0.401 J µg/Kg 0.0848 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl6-BZ#169 0.273 U µg/Kg 0.273 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#170 2.69 µg/Kg 0.318 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0648 U µg/Kg 0.0648 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#177 0.447 J µg/Kg 0.0910 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#180 5.44 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#183 0.463 µg/Kg 0.0617 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#187 4.70 µg/Kg 0.0679 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl7-BZ#189 0.122 U µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl8-BZ#194 1.23 µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl8-BZ#195 0.278 J µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl8-BZ#201 1.70 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl9-BZ#206 0.918 µg/Kg 0.165 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Cl10-BZ#209 0.185 J µg/Kg 0.0771 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.54 U µg/Kg 4.54 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.308 J µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Trichlorobiphenyls 10.8 µg/Kg 0.455 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 67.1 µg/Kg 0.0710 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Pentachlorobiphenyls 76.0 µg/Kg 0.0817 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Hexachlorobiphenyls 37.4 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Heptachlorobiphenyls 12.9 µg/Kg 0.0710 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Octachlorobiphenyls 3.68 µg/Kg 0.0648 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Nonachlorobiphenyls 5.41 µg/Kg 0.165 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.185 J µg/Kg 0.0771 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Total Homologs 214 µg/Kg 0.0771 µg/Kg9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Percent Lipids 1.6 % 0.1 %9/14/2001 Comp of Sta 8 614814 4783340 8 0308031-08 Percent Moisture 69.0 % 0.1 %
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 12 of 33
9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl2-BZ#8 0.128 U µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl3-BZ#18 0.285 U µg/Kg 0.285 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 4.62 J µg/Kg 2.05 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#44 0.195 U µg/Kg 0.195 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#45 0.261 U µg/Kg 0.261 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#47 1.26 J µg/Kg 0.331 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#49 0.171 J µg/Kg 0.162 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#52 0.350 J µg/Kg 0.185 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#56 1.01 µg/Kg 0.0969 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#66 1.13 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#70 0.276 J µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#74 1.39 µg/Kg 0.200 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#77 0.179 U µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl4-BZ#81 0.177 U µg/Kg 0.177 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#87 0.522 µg/Kg 0.0790 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0611 U µg/Kg 0.0611 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#99 2.78 µg/Kg 0.0418 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#101 0.425 J µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#105 1.88 µg/Kg 0.0582 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#110 0.113 U µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#114 0.127 J µg/Kg 0.0522 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#118 3.94 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#123 0.103 U µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0910 U µg/Kg 0.0910 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#128 0.328 J µg/Kg 0.0820 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#138 7.81 µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#146 0.887 µg/Kg 0.0746 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#149 0.194 J µg/Kg 0.0954 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#151 0.158 U µg/Kg 0.158 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#153 8.31 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#156 1.28 µg/Kg 0.0969 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#157 0.246 J µg/Kg 0.0761 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#158 0.194 J µg/Kg 0.0641 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#167 0.194 J µg/Kg 0.0820 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl6-BZ#169 0.264 U µg/Kg 0.264 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 13 of 33
9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#170 2.04 µg/Kg 0.307 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0626 U µg/Kg 0.0626 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#177 0.201 J µg/Kg 0.0880 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#180 3.71 µg/Kg 0.131 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#183 0.298 µg/Kg 0.0596 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#187 1.93 µg/Kg 0.0656 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl7-BZ#189 0.118 U µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl8-BZ#194 0.828 µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl8-BZ#195 0.216 J µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl8-BZ#201 1.12 µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl9-BZ#206 0.552 J µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Cl10-BZ#209 0.112 J µg/Kg 0.0746 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.38 U µg/Kg 4.38 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.128 U µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Trichlorobiphenyls 4.21 µg/Kg 0.440 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 10.6 µg/Kg 0.0686 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Pentachlorobiphenyls 17.3 µg/Kg 0.0790 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Hexachlorobiphenyls 21.0 µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Heptachlorobiphenyls 8.53 µg/Kg 0.0686 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Octachlorobiphenyls 1.72 µg/Kg 0.0626 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Nonachlorobiphenyls 4.26 µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.112 J µg/Kg 0.0746 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Total Homologs 67.8 µg/Kg 0.0746 µg/Kg9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Percent Lipids 2.8 % 0.1 %9/15/2001 Comp of Sta 10 614100 4788175 10 0308031-09 Percent Moisture 70.5 % 0.1 %10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl2-BZ#8 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl3-BZ#18 0.322 U µg/Kg 0.322 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 11.1 J µg/Kg 2.33 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#44 0.946 J µg/Kg 0.221 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#45 0.296 U µg/Kg 0.296 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#47 14.8 µg/Kg 0.375 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#49 1.73 µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#52 5.17 µg/Kg 0.209 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#56 5.28 µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#66 7.87 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 14 of 33
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#70 1.33 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#74 12.3 µg/Kg 0.226 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#77 0.203 U µg/Kg 0.203 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl4-BZ#81 0.201 U µg/Kg 0.201 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#87 6.83 µg/Kg 0.0895 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#95 0.768 µg/Kg 0.0692 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#99 58.6 µg/Kg 0.0473 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#101 3.58 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#105 16.3 µg/Kg 0.0659 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#110 0.929 µg/Kg 0.128 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#114 0.937 µg/Kg 0.0591 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#118 34.3 µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#123 0.116 U µg/Kg 0.116 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl5-BZ#126 0.103 U µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#128 3.37 µg/Kg 0.0929 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#138 93.6 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#146 8.72 µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#149 1.63 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#151 0.363 J µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#153 145 µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#156 11.8 µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#157 2.15 µg/Kg 0.0861 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#158 1.77 µg/Kg 0.0726 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#167 0.971 µg/Kg 0.0929 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl6-BZ#169 0.299 U µg/Kg 0.299 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#170 14.0 µg/Kg 0.348 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0709 U µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#177 1.27 µg/Kg 0.0996 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#180 28.9 µg/Kg 0.149 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#183 2.13 µg/Kg 0.0675 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#187 15.2 µg/Kg 0.0743 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl7-BZ#189 0.133 U µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl8-BZ#194 3.60 µg/Kg 0.155 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl8-BZ#195 0.895 µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl8-BZ#201 4.41 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 15 of 33
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl9-BZ#206 1.95 µg/Kg 0.181 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Cl10-BZ#209 0.296 J µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.96 U µg/Kg 4.96 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Trichlorobiphenyls 8.67 µg/Kg 0.498 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 66.8 µg/Kg 0.0777 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Pentachlorobiphenyls 197 µg/Kg 0.0895 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Hexachlorobiphenyls 283 µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Heptachlorobiphenyls 55.6 µg/Kg 0.0777 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Octachlorobiphenyls 10.6 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Nonachlorobiphenyls 7.02 µg/Kg 0.181 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.296 J µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Total Homologs 629 µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Percent Lipids 5.4 % 0.1 %10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 11 614778 4791139 11 0308031-10 Percent Moisture 69.2 % 0.1 %10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl2-BZ#8 0.299 U µg/Kg 0.299 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl3-BZ#18 0.665 U µg/Kg 0.665 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 24.6 µg/Kg 4.79 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#44 9.14 µg/Kg 0.456 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#45 0.609 U µg/Kg 0.609 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#47 62.4 µg/Kg 0.773 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#49 10.3 µg/Kg 0.379 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#52 23.0 µg/Kg 0.432 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#56 23.2 µg/Kg 0.226 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#66 35.0 µg/Kg 0.303 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#70 14.7 µg/Kg 0.264 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#74 60.7 µg/Kg 0.466 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#77 0.418 U µg/Kg 0.418 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl4-BZ#81 0.414 U µg/Kg 0.414 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#87 30.0 µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#95 5.93 µg/Kg 0.143 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#99 186 µg/Kg 0.0974 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#101 21.9 µg/Kg 0.278 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#105 60.9 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#110 9.90 µg/Kg 0.264 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 16 of 33
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#114 5.17 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#118 160 µg/Kg 0.285 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#123 0.240 U µg/Kg 0.240 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl5-BZ#126 0.212 U µg/Kg 0.212 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#128 10.4 µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#138 277 µg/Kg 0.275 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#146 30.4 µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#149 8.14 µg/Kg 0.223 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#151 0.369 U µg/Kg 0.369 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#153 365 µg/Kg 0.317 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#156 36.2 µg/Kg 0.226 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#157 6.61 µg/Kg 0.177 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#158 5.85 µg/Kg 0.150 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#167 5.48 µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl6-BZ#169 0.616 U µg/Kg 0.616 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#170 39.6 µg/Kg 0.717 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#174 0.539 J µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#177 3.72 µg/Kg 0.205 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#180 81.2 µg/Kg 0.306 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#183 8.28 µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#187 54.4 µg/Kg 0.153 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl7-BZ#189 0.275 U µg/Kg 0.275 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl8-BZ#194 12.3 µg/Kg 0.320 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl8-BZ#195 2.56 µg/Kg 0.317 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl8-BZ#201 14.9 µg/Kg 0.278 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl9-BZ#206 6.40 µg/Kg 0.372 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Cl10-BZ#209 0.870 J µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Monochlorobiphenyls 10.2 U µg/Kg 10.2 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.299 U µg/Kg 0.299 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Trichlorobiphenyls 28.8 µg/Kg 1.03 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 292 µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Pentachlorobiphenyls 769 µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Hexachlorobiphenyls 819 µg/Kg 0.292 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Heptachlorobiphenyls 175 µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Octachlorobiphenyls 32.4 µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 17 of 33
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Nonachlorobiphenyls 16.0 µg/Kg 0.372 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.870 J µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Total Homologs 2130 µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Percent Lipids 4.1 % 0.1 %10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (mouse 614851 4790327 12 0308031-11 Percent Moisture 69.9 % 0.1 %9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl2-BZ#8 0.137 U µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl3-BZ#18 0.303 U µg/Kg 0.303 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 2.19 U µg/Kg 2.19 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#44 0.208 U µg/Kg 0.208 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#45 0.278 U µg/Kg 0.278 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#47 0.381 J µg/Kg 0.353 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#49 0.318 J µg/Kg 0.173 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#52 0.349 J µg/Kg 0.197 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#56 0.850 µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#66 0.492 J µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#70 0.230 J µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#74 0.429 J µg/Kg 0.213 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#77 0.191 U µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl4-BZ#81 0.189 U µg/Kg 0.189 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#87 0.342 J µg/Kg 0.0842 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0651 U µg/Kg 0.0651 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#99 1.28 µg/Kg 0.0445 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#101 0.238 J µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#105 0.500 µg/Kg 0.0619 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#110 0.121 U µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0556 U µg/Kg 0.0556 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#118 1.29 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#123 0.110 U µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0969 U µg/Kg 0.0969 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#128 0.0873 U µg/Kg 0.0873 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#138 2.62 µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#146 0.286 J µg/Kg 0.0794 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#149 0.111 J µg/Kg 0.102 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#151 0.168 U µg/Kg 0.168 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#153 3.26 µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 18 of 33
9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#156 0.349 J µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#157 0.0873 J µg/Kg 0.0810 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0794 J µg/Kg 0.0683 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#167 0.0873 U µg/Kg 0.0873 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl6-BZ#169 0.281 U µg/Kg 0.281 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#170 0.327 U µg/Kg 0.327 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0667 U µg/Kg 0.0667 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#177 0.0937 U µg/Kg 0.0937 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#180 1.07 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#183 0.0873 J µg/Kg 0.0635 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#187 0.659 µg/Kg 0.0699 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl7-BZ#189 0.125 U µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl8-BZ#194 0.310 J µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl8-BZ#195 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl8-BZ#201 0.619 J µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl9-BZ#206 0.326 J µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Cl10-BZ#209 0.0873 J µg/Kg 0.0794 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.67 U µg/Kg 4.67 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.137 U µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Trichlorobiphenyls 1.45 J µg/Kg 0.468 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 8.83 µg/Kg 0.0731 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Pentachlorobiphenyls 7.12 µg/Kg 0.0842 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Hexachlorobiphenyls 9.20 µg/Kg 0.133 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Heptachlorobiphenyls 2.01 µg/Kg 0.0731 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Octachlorobiphenyls 0.897 µg/Kg 0.0667 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Nonachlorobiphenyls 0.326 J µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.0873 J µg/Kg 0.0794 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Total Homologs 29.9 µg/Kg 0.0794 µg/Kg9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Percent Lipids 2.2 % 0.1 %9/26/2001 Comp of Sta 13 611801 4757967 13 0308031-12 Percent Moisture 72.3 % 0.1 %9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl2-BZ#8 0.142 U µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl3-BZ#18 0.315 U µg/Kg 0.315 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 2.27 U µg/Kg 2.27 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#44 0.216 U µg/Kg 0.216 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#45 0.289 U µg/Kg 0.289 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 19 of 33
9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#47 0.366 U µg/Kg 0.366 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#49 0.256 J µg/Kg 0.180 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#52 0.231 J µg/Kg 0.205 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#56 0.528 J µg/Kg 0.107 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#66 0.182 J µg/Kg 0.144 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#70 0.125 U µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#74 0.221 U µg/Kg 0.221 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#77 0.198 U µg/Kg 0.198 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl4-BZ#81 0.196 U µg/Kg 0.196 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#87 0.231 J µg/Kg 0.0875 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0677 U µg/Kg 0.0677 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#99 1.05 µg/Kg 0.0462 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#101 0.140 J µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#105 0.487 µg/Kg 0.0644 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#110 0.125 U µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0578 U µg/Kg 0.0578 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#118 1.23 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#123 0.114 U µg/Kg 0.114 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl5-BZ#126 0.101 U µg/Kg 0.101 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#128 0.0908 U µg/Kg 0.0908 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#138 4.29 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#146 0.503 µg/Kg 0.0825 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#149 0.106 U µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#151 0.175 U µg/Kg 0.175 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#153 6.89 µg/Kg 0.150 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#156 0.809 µg/Kg 0.107 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#157 0.190 J µg/Kg 0.0842 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0710 U µg/Kg 0.0710 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#167 0.0908 U µg/Kg 0.0908 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl6-BZ#169 0.292 U µg/Kg 0.292 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#170 0.340 U µg/Kg 0.340 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0693 U µg/Kg 0.0693 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#177 0.0974 U µg/Kg 0.0974 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#180 3.44 µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#183 0.190 J µg/Kg 0.0660 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 20 of 33
9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#187 0.875 µg/Kg 0.0726 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl7-BZ#189 0.130 U µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl8-BZ#194 1.40 µg/Kg 0.152 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl8-BZ#195 0.150 U µg/Kg 0.150 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl8-BZ#201 1.21 µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl9-BZ#206 0.941 µg/Kg 0.177 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Cl10-BZ#209 0.198 J µg/Kg 0.0825 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.85 U µg/Kg 4.85 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.142 U µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Trichlorobiphenyls 1.30 J µg/Kg 0.487 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 7.04 µg/Kg 0.0759 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Pentachlorobiphenyls 6.65 µg/Kg 0.0875 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Hexachlorobiphenyls 11.5 µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Heptachlorobiphenyls 6.71 µg/Kg 0.0759 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Octachlorobiphenyls 2.82 µg/Kg 0.0693 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Nonachlorobiphenyls 0.941 µg/Kg 0.177 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.198 J µg/Kg 0.0825 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Total Homologs 37.1 µg/Kg 0.0825 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Percent Lipids 3.0 % 0.1 %9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 15 611552 4756404 15 0308031-13 Percent Moisture 70.3 % 0.1 %9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl2-BZ#8 0.138 U µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl3-BZ#18 0.307 U µg/Kg 0.307 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 3.46 J µg/Kg 2.21 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#44 1.23 µg/Kg 0.211 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#45 0.281 U µg/Kg 0.281 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#47 4.21 µg/Kg 0.357 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#49 1.60 µg/Kg 0.175 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#52 2.81 µg/Kg 0.199 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#56 2.31 µg/Kg 0.105 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#66 3.54 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#70 2.43 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#74 3.02 µg/Kg 0.215 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#77 0.193 U µg/Kg 0.193 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl4-BZ#81 0.191 U µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#87 3.62 µg/Kg 0.0852 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 21 of 33
9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#95 0.659 µg/Kg 0.0659 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#99 22.9 µg/Kg 0.0450 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#101 2.73 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#105 5.33 µg/Kg 0.0627 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#110 1.25 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0563 U µg/Kg 0.0563 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#118 10.3 µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#123 0.111 U µg/Kg 0.111 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0980 U µg/Kg 0.0980 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#128 1.50 µg/Kg 0.0884 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#138 41.7 µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#146 3.96 µg/Kg 0.0804 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#149 1.15 µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#151 0.170 U µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#153 52.9 µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#156 6.58 µg/Kg 0.105 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#157 1.25 µg/Kg 0.0820 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#158 0.932 µg/Kg 0.0691 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#167 0.587 µg/Kg 0.0884 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl6-BZ#169 0.285 U µg/Kg 0.285 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#170 11.0 µg/Kg 0.331 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0675 U µg/Kg 0.0675 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#177 0.474 µg/Kg 0.0948 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#180 22.6 µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#183 1.34 µg/Kg 0.0643 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#187 14.1 µg/Kg 0.0707 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl7-BZ#189 0.127 U µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl8-BZ#194 5.06 µg/Kg 0.148 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl8-BZ#195 0.972 µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl8-BZ#201 4.48 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl9-BZ#206 4.61 µg/Kg 0.172 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Cl10-BZ#209 0.571 µg/Kg 0.0804 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.72 U µg/Kg 4.72 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.138 U µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Trichlorobiphenyls 3.59 µg/Kg 0.474 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 22 of 33
9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 31.0 µg/Kg 0.0739 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Pentachlorobiphenyls 69.9 µg/Kg 0.0852 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Hexachlorobiphenyls 123 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Heptachlorobiphenyls 46.3 µg/Kg 0.0739 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Octachlorobiphenyls 14.4 µg/Kg 0.0675 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Nonachlorobiphenyls 14.0 µg/Kg 0.172 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.571 µg/Kg 0.0804 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Total Homologs 302 µg/Kg 0.0804 µg/Kg9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Percent Lipids 1.8 % 0.1 %9/20/2001 Comp of Sta 16 609620 4754219 16 0308031-14 Percent Moisture 72.0 % 0.1 %
10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl2-BZ#8 0.183 U µg/Kg 0.183 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl3-BZ#18 0.405 U µg/Kg 0.405 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 5.36 J µg/Kg 2.92 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#44 1.04 J µg/Kg 0.278 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#45 0.372 U µg/Kg 0.372 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#47 13.7 µg/Kg 0.471 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#49 1.88 µg/Kg 0.231 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#52 4.74 µg/Kg 0.263 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#56 4.87 µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#66 6.01 µg/Kg 0.185 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#70 1.56 µg/Kg 0.161 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#74 10.0 µg/Kg 0.285 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#77 0.255 U µg/Kg 0.255 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl4-BZ#81 0.253 U µg/Kg 0.253 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#87 5.26 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#95 0.817 µg/Kg 0.0870 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#99 35.5 µg/Kg 0.0594 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#101 3.60 µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#105 12.7 µg/Kg 0.0828 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#110 1.42 µg/Kg 0.161 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#114 0.764 µg/Kg 0.0743 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#118 25.4 µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#123 0.147 U µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl5-BZ#126 0.130 U µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#128 1.80 µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 23 of 33
10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#138 51.0 µg/Kg 0.168 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#146 5.82 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#149 1.09 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#151 0.225 U µg/Kg 0.225 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#153 69.5 µg/Kg 0.193 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#156 7.50 µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#157 1.35 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#158 0.913 µg/Kg 0.0913 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#167 0.817 µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl6-BZ#169 0.376 U µg/Kg 0.376 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#170 10.1 µg/Kg 0.437 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0892 U µg/Kg 0.0892 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#177 0.892 µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#180 18.2 µg/Kg 0.187 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#183 1.36 µg/Kg 0.0849 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#187 9.17 µg/Kg 0.0934 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl7-BZ#189 0.168 U µg/Kg 0.168 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl8-BZ#194 5.12 µg/Kg 0.195 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl8-BZ#195 0.945 J µg/Kg 0.193 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl8-BZ#201 6.22 µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl9-BZ#206 4.14 µg/Kg 0.227 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Cl10-BZ#209 0.690 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Monochlorobiphenyls 6.24 U µg/Kg 6.24 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.183 U µg/Kg 0.183 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Trichlorobiphenyls 5.21 µg/Kg 0.626 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 65.8 µg/Kg 0.0977 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Pentachlorobiphenyls 138 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Hexachlorobiphenyls 151 µg/Kg 0.178 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Heptachlorobiphenyls 36.6 µg/Kg 0.0977 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Octachlorobiphenyls 12.2 µg/Kg 0.0892 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Nonachlorobiphenyls 13.4 µg/Kg 0.227 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.690 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Total Homologs 423 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Percent Lipids 5.7 % 0.1 %10/15/2001 Comp of Sta 17 607475 4750334 17 0308031-15 Percent Moisture 62.6 % 0.1 %
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 24 of 33
9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl2-BZ#8 0.132 U µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl3-BZ#18 0.294 U µg/Kg 0.294 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 3.40 J µg/Kg 2.12 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#44 0.231 J µg/Kg 0.201 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#45 0.269 U µg/Kg 0.269 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#47 0.845 J µg/Kg 0.341 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#49 0.231 J µg/Kg 0.168 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#52 0.191 U µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#56 0.715 µg/Kg 0.0999 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#66 0.984 µg/Kg 0.134 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#70 0.223 J µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#74 0.976 J µg/Kg 0.206 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#77 0.184 U µg/Kg 0.184 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl4-BZ#81 0.183 U µg/Kg 0.183 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#87 0.507 µg/Kg 0.0815 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0630 U µg/Kg 0.0630 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#99 3.84 µg/Kg 0.0430 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#101 0.323 J µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#105 1.68 µg/Kg 0.0599 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#110 0.117 U µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#114 0.131 J µg/Kg 0.0538 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#118 3.94 µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#123 0.106 U µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0938 U µg/Kg 0.0938 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#128 0.207 J µg/Kg 0.0845 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#138 10.5 µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#146 1.11 µg/Kg 0.0769 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#149 0.138 J µg/Kg 0.0984 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#151 0.163 U µg/Kg 0.163 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#153 12.9 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#156 1.75 µg/Kg 0.0999 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#157 0.323 J µg/Kg 0.0784 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#158 0.200 J µg/Kg 0.0661 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#167 0.207 J µg/Kg 0.0845 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl6-BZ#169 0.272 U µg/Kg 0.272 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 25 of 33
9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#170 3.80 µg/Kg 0.317 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0646 U µg/Kg 0.0646 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#177 0.207 J µg/Kg 0.0907 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#180 6.63 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#183 0.430 µg/Kg 0.0615 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#187 3.36 µg/Kg 0.0676 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl7-BZ#189 0.121 U µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl8-BZ#194 2.61 µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl8-BZ#195 0.354 J µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl8-BZ#201 2.64 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl9-BZ#206 2.44 µg/Kg 0.164 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Cl10-BZ#209 0.361 J µg/Kg 0.0769 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.52 U µg/Kg 4.52 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.132 U µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Trichlorobiphenyls 3.08 µg/Kg 0.454 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 7.48 µg/Kg 0.0707 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Pentachlorobiphenyls 20.0 µg/Kg 0.0815 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Hexachlorobiphenyls 30.6 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Heptachlorobiphenyls 13.6 µg/Kg 0.0707 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Octachlorobiphenyls 6.03 µg/Kg 0.0646 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Nonachlorobiphenyls 5.82 µg/Kg 0.164 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.361 J µg/Kg 0.0769 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Total Homologs 87.0 µg/Kg 0.0769 µg/Kg9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Percent Lipids 2.8 % 0.1 %9/24/2001 Comp of Sta 18 608173 4747866 18 0308032-01 Percent Moisture 70.4 % 0.1 %
10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl2-BZ#8 0.134 U µg/Kg 0.134 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl3-BZ#18 0.297 U µg/Kg 0.297 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 4.22 J µg/Kg 2.14 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#44 0.559 J µg/Kg 0.203 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#45 0.272 U µg/Kg 0.272 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#47 7.60 µg/Kg 0.345 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#49 0.885 µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#52 2.17 µg/Kg 0.193 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#56 2.52 µg/Kg 0.101 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#66 3.85 µg/Kg 0.135 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 26 of 33
10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#70 0.986 µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#74 4.99 µg/Kg 0.208 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#77 0.186 U µg/Kg 0.186 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl4-BZ#81 0.185 U µg/Kg 0.185 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#87 2.24 µg/Kg 0.0823 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#95 0.388 µg/Kg 0.0637 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#99 16.6 J µg/Kg 0.0435 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#101 1.81 µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#105 5.94 J µg/Kg 0.0606 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#110 0.458 J µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#114 0.396 µg/Kg 0.0544 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#118 13.0 J µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#123 0.107 U µg/Kg 0.107 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0947 U µg/Kg 0.0947 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#128 0.629 µg/Kg 0.0854 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#138 28.4 J µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#146 3.32 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#149 0.380 J µg/Kg 0.0994 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#151 0.165 U µg/Kg 0.165 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#153 41.8 J µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#156 4.20 µg/Kg 0.101 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#157 0.784 µg/Kg 0.0792 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#158 0.419 J µg/Kg 0.0668 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#167 0.412 J µg/Kg 0.0854 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl6-BZ#169 0.275 U µg/Kg 0.275 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#170 7.59 J µg/Kg 0.320 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0652 U µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#177 0.497 µg/Kg 0.0916 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#180 13.1 µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#183 0.637 µg/Kg 0.0621 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#187 5.50 µg/Kg 0.0683 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl7-BZ#189 0.123 U µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl8-BZ#194 4.34 µg/Kg 0.143 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl8-BZ#195 0.559 J µg/Kg 0.141 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl8-BZ#201 5.92 J µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 27 of 33
10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl9-BZ#206 4.57 µg/Kg 0.166 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Cl10-BZ#209 0.714 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.57 U µg/Kg 4.57 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.134 U µg/Kg 0.134 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Trichlorobiphenyls 4.11 µg/Kg 0.458 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 30.9 µg/Kg 0.0714 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Pentachlorobiphenyls 68.1 µg/Kg 0.0823 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Hexachlorobiphenyls 88.1 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Heptachlorobiphenyls 26.3 µg/Kg 0.0714 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Octachlorobiphenyls 10.3 µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Nonachlorobiphenyls 9.80 µg/Kg 0.166 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.714 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Total Homologs 238 µg/Kg 0.0776 µg/Kg10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Percent Lipids 5.0 % 0.1 %10/11/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (mouse 609713 4741759 20 0308032-02 Percent Moisture 68.1 % 0.1 %9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl2-BZ#8 0.137 U µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl3-BZ#18 0.304 U µg/Kg 0.304 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 2.21 J µg/Kg 2.19 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#44 0.209 U µg/Kg 0.209 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#45 0.279 U µg/Kg 0.279 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#47 0.773 J µg/Kg 0.354 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#49 0.174 U µg/Kg 0.174 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#52 0.198 U µg/Kg 0.198 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#56 0.789 µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#66 0.271 J µg/Kg 0.139 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#70 0.121 U µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#74 0.223 J µg/Kg 0.213 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#77 0.191 U µg/Kg 0.191 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl4-BZ#81 0.190 U µg/Kg 0.190 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#87 0.0844 U µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0653 U µg/Kg 0.0653 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#99 2.24 µg/Kg 0.0446 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#101 0.207 J µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#105 1.43 µg/Kg 0.0621 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#110 0.121 U µg/Kg 0.121 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 28 of 33
9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0558 U µg/Kg 0.0558 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#118 4.30 µg/Kg 0.131 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#123 0.110 U µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0972 U µg/Kg 0.0972 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#128 0.247 J µg/Kg 0.0876 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#138 10.2 µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#146 1.37 µg/Kg 0.0797 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#149 0.102 U µg/Kg 0.102 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#151 0.169 U µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#153 16.2 µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#156 1.55 µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#157 0.311 J µg/Kg 0.0813 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#158 0.207 J µg/Kg 0.0685 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#167 0.287 J µg/Kg 0.0876 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl6-BZ#169 0.282 U µg/Kg 0.282 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#170 3.02 µg/Kg 0.328 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0669 U µg/Kg 0.0669 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#177 0.0940 U µg/Kg 0.0940 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#180 5.48 µg/Kg 0.140 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#183 0.422 µg/Kg 0.0637 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#187 2.65 µg/Kg 0.0701 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl7-BZ#189 0.126 U µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl8-BZ#194 1.58 µg/Kg 0.147 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl8-BZ#195 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl8-BZ#201 3.24 µg/Kg 0.127 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl9-BZ#206 2.30 µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Cl10-BZ#209 0.574 µg/Kg 0.0797 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.68 U µg/Kg 4.68 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.137 U µg/Kg 0.137 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Trichlorobiphenyls 1.80 J µg/Kg 0.470 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 6.78 µg/Kg 0.0733 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Pentachlorobiphenyls 23.0 µg/Kg 0.0844 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Hexachlorobiphenyls 32.8 µg/Kg 0.134 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Heptachlorobiphenyls 11.3 µg/Kg 0.0733 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Octachlorobiphenyls 4.24 µg/Kg 0.0669 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 29 of 33
9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Nonachlorobiphenyls 9.65 µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.574 µg/Kg 0.0797 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Total Homologs 90.2 µg/Kg 0.0797 µg/Kg9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Percent Lipids 3.5 % 0.1 %9/27/2001 Comp of Sta 21 609281 4740033 21 0308032-03 Percent Moisture 72.6 % 0.1 %
10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl2-BZ#8 0.122 U µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl3-BZ#18 0.271 U µg/Kg 0.271 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 2.06 J µg/Kg 1.95 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#44 0.186 U µg/Kg 0.186 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#45 0.248 U µg/Kg 0.248 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#47 0.333 J µg/Kg 0.315 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#49 0.155 U µg/Kg 0.155 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#52 0.255 J µg/Kg 0.176 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#56 1.03 µg/Kg 0.0922 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#66 0.123 U µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#70 0.108 U µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#74 0.190 U µg/Kg 0.190 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#77 0.170 U µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl4-BZ#81 0.169 U µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#87 0.0752 U µg/Kg 0.0752 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0582 U µg/Kg 0.0582 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#99 0.780 µg/Kg 0.0397 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#101 0.128 J µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#105 0.305 µg/Kg 0.0553 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#110 0.108 U µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0496 U µg/Kg 0.0496 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#118 0.723 µg/Kg 0.116 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#123 0.0979 U µg/Kg 0.0979 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0865 U µg/Kg 0.0865 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#128 0.0780 U µg/Kg 0.0780 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#138 2.18 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#146 0.390 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#149 0.0908 U µg/Kg 0.0908 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#151 0.150 U µg/Kg 0.150 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#153 3.72 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 30 of 33
10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#156 0.284 J µg/Kg 0.0922 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#157 0.0723 U µg/Kg 0.0723 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0610 UJ µg/Kg 0.0610 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#167 0.0780 U µg/Kg 0.0780 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl6-BZ#169 0.251 U µg/Kg 0.251 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#170 1.06 J µg/Kg 0.292 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0596 U µg/Kg 0.0596 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#177 0.121 J µg/Kg 0.0837 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#180 1.92 µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#183 0.184 J µg/Kg 0.0567 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#187 0.681 µg/Kg 0.0624 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl7-BZ#189 0.112 U µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl8-BZ#194 1.09 µg/Kg 0.131 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl8-BZ#195 0.129 U µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl8-BZ#201 0.993 µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl9-BZ#206 0.787 µg/Kg 0.152 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Cl10-BZ#209 0.312 J µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.17 U µg/Kg 4.17 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.122 U µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Trichlorobiphenyls 2.48 µg/Kg 0.418 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 7.95 µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Pentachlorobiphenyls 6.97 µg/Kg 0.0752 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Hexachlorobiphenyls 7.94 µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Heptachlorobiphenyls 3.93 µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Octachlorobiphenyls 1.88 µg/Kg 0.0596 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Nonachlorobiphenyls 5.49 µg/Kg 0.152 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.312 J µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Total Homologs 37.0 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Percent Lipids 2.9 % 0.1 %10/16/2001 Comp of Sta 22 602339 4715386 22 0308032-04 Percent Moisture 71.8 % 0.1 %10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl2-BZ#8 0.115 U µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl3-BZ#18 0.256 U µg/Kg 0.256 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 1.85 U µg/Kg 1.85 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#44 0.176 U µg/Kg 0.176 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#45 0.235 U µg/Kg 0.235 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 31 of 33
10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#47 0.375 J µg/Kg 0.298 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#49 0.146 U µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#52 0.166 U µg/Kg 0.166 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#56 0.630 µg/Kg 0.0871 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#66 0.117 U µg/Kg 0.117 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#70 0.102 U µg/Kg 0.102 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#74 0.180 U µg/Kg 0.180 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#77 0.161 U µg/Kg 0.161 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl4-BZ#81 0.160 U µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#87 0.0710 U µg/Kg 0.0710 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#95 0.0550 U µg/Kg 0.0550 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#99 0.154 J µg/Kg 0.0375 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#101 0.107 U µg/Kg 0.107 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#105 0.0523 U µg/Kg 0.0523 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#110 0.102 U µg/Kg 0.102 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#114 0.0469 U µg/Kg 0.0469 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#118 0.110 U µg/Kg 0.110 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#123 0.0925 U µg/Kg 0.0925 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0818 U µg/Kg 0.0818 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#128 0.0737 U µg/Kg 0.0737 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#138 0.643 µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#146 0.0670 U µg/Kg 0.0670 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#149 0.0858 U µg/Kg 0.0858 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#151 0.142 U µg/Kg 0.142 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#153 1.42 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#156 0.0871 U µg/Kg 0.0871 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#157 0.0684 U µg/Kg 0.0684 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0576 UJ µg/Kg 0.0576 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#167 0.0737 U µg/Kg 0.0737 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl6-BZ#169 0.237 U µg/Kg 0.237 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#170 4.03 µg/Kg 0.276 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0563 U µg/Kg 0.0563 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#177 0.0791 U µg/Kg 0.0791 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#180 8.67 µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#183 0.168 J µg/Kg 0.0536 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 32 of 33
10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#187 0.255 J µg/Kg 0.0590 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl7-BZ#189 0.106 U µg/Kg 0.106 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl8-BZ#194 6.72 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl8-BZ#195 0.617 µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl8-BZ#201 2.47 µg/Kg 0.107 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl9-BZ#206 2.37 µg/Kg 0.143 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Cl10-BZ#209 0.308 J µg/Kg 0.0670 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Monochlorobiphenyls 3.94 U µg/Kg 3.94 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.115 U µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Trichlorobiphenyls 4.72 µg/Kg 0.395 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 6.53 µg/Kg 0.0617 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Pentachlorobiphenyls 0.355 µg/Kg 0.0710 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Hexachlorobiphenyls 2.74 µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Heptachlorobiphenyls 11.8 µg/Kg 0.0617 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Octachlorobiphenyls 9.46 µg/Kg 0.0563 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Nonachlorobiphenyls 11.3 µg/Kg 0.143 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.308 J µg/Kg 0.0670 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Total Homologs 47.2 µg/Kg 0.0670 µg/Kg10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Percent Lipids 2.8 % 0.1 %10/18/2001 Comp of Sta 23 600373 4705549 23 0308032-05 Percent Moisture 71.4 % 0.1 %
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 33 of 33
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl2-BZ#8 0.118 U µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl3-BZ#18 0.261 U µg/Kg 0.261 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 2.04 J µg/Kg 1.88 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#44 0.179 U µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#45 0.239 U µg/Kg 0.239 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#47 0.520 J µg/Kg 0.303 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#49 0.417 J µg/Kg 0.149 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#52 0.615 J µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#56 1.78 µg/Kg 0.0889 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#66 4.05 µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#70 1.03 µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#74 1.80 µg/Kg 0.183 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#77 0.164 U µg/Kg 0.164 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl4-BZ#81 0.163 U µg/Kg 0.163 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#87 0.588 µg/Kg 0.0725 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#95 0.116 J µg/Kg 0.0561 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#99 2.02 µg/Kg 0.0383 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#101 0.492 J µg/Kg 0.109 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#105 1.98 µg/Kg 0.0533 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#110 0.342 J µg/Kg 0.104 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#114 0.287 µg/Kg 0.0479 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#118 4.07 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#123 0.0943 U µg/Kg 0.0943 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0834 U µg/Kg 0.0834 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#128 0.356 J µg/Kg 0.0752 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#138 1.71 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#146 0.349 µg/Kg 0.0684 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#149 0.0889 J µg/Kg 0.0875 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#151 0.145 U µg/Kg 0.145 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#153 2.03 µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#156 0.308 J µg/Kg 0.0889 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#157 0.0697 U µg/Kg 0.0697 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#158 0.0820 J µg/Kg 0.0588 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#167 0.178 J µg/Kg 0.0752 µg/Kg
VALUE, INTERPRETIVE QUALIFIER2 AND
UNITS3 DETECTION LIMIT3
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 1 of 6
9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl6-BZ#169 0.242 U µg/Kg 0.242 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#170 0.827 J µg/Kg 0.282 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0574 U µg/Kg 0.0574 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#177 0.0807 U µg/Kg 0.0807 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#180 0.608 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#183 0.0752 J µg/Kg 0.0547 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#187 0.479 µg/Kg 0.0602 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl7-BZ#189 0.108 U µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl8-BZ#194 0.164 J µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl8-BZ#195 0.124 U µg/Kg 0.124 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl8-BZ#201 0.109 U µg/Kg 0.109 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl9-BZ#206 0.150 J µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Cl10-BZ#209 0.0684 U µg/Kg 0.0684 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.02 U µg/Kg 4.02 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.118 U µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Trichlorobiphenyls 2.47 µg/Kg 0.403 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 16.3 µg/Kg 0.0629 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Pentachlorobiphenyls 23.4 µg/Kg 0.0725 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Hexachlorobiphenyls 5.75 µg/Kg 0.115 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Heptachlorobiphenyls 2.76 µg/Kg 0.0629 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Octachlorobiphenyls 0.171 J µg/Kg 0.0574 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Nonachlorobiphenyls 0.146 U µg/Kg 0.146 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.0684 U µg/Kg 0.0684 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Total Homologs 51.0 µg/Kg 0.0684 µg/Kg9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Percent Lipids 1.3 % 0.1 %9/9/2001 Comp of Sta 2 613552 4761987 2 0308032-06 Percent Moisture 76.6 % 0.1 %
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl2-BZ#8 0.129 U µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl3-BZ#18 0.286 U µg/Kg 0.286 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 20.9 µg/Kg 2.06 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#44 0.710 J µg/Kg 0.196 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#45 0.262 U µg/Kg 0.262 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#47 3.21 µg/Kg 0.332 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#49 1.40 µg/Kg 0.163 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#52 2.17 µg/Kg 0.185 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 2 of 6
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#56 9.29 µg/Kg 0.0972 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#66 19.1 µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#70 4.22 µg/Kg 0.114 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#74 16.8 µg/Kg 0.200 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#77 0.179 U µg/Kg 0.179 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl4-BZ#81 0.178 U µg/Kg 0.178 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#87 1.97 µg/Kg 0.0793 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#95 0.531 µg/Kg 0.0613 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#99 7.04 µg/Kg 0.0419 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#101 2.29 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#105 10.1 µg/Kg 0.0583 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#110 1.22 µg/Kg 0.114 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#114 1.15 µg/Kg 0.0523 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#118 17.4 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#123 0.103 U µg/Kg 0.103 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0912 U µg/Kg 0.0912 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#128 1.03 µg/Kg 0.0823 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#138 5.29 µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#146 1.80 µg/Kg 0.0748 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#149 0.456 J µg/Kg 0.0957 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#151 0.172 J µg/Kg 0.159 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#153 5.12 µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#156 1.51 µg/Kg 0.0972 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#157 0.359 J µg/Kg 0.0763 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#158 0.179 J µg/Kg 0.0643 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#167 0.770 µg/Kg 0.0823 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl6-BZ#169 0.265 U µg/Kg 0.265 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#170 2.13 µg/Kg 0.308 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0628 U µg/Kg 0.0628 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#177 0.479 µg/Kg 0.0882 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#180 2.59 µg/Kg 0.132 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#183 0.307 µg/Kg 0.0598 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#187 1.80 µg/Kg 0.0658 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl7-BZ#189 0.118 U µg/Kg 0.118 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 3 of 6
10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl8-BZ#194 0.456 J µg/Kg 0.138 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl8-BZ#195 0.187 J µg/Kg 0.136 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl8-BZ#201 0.905 µg/Kg 0.120 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl9-BZ#206 0.232 J µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Cl10-BZ#209 0.0748 U µg/Kg 0.0748 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.40 U µg/Kg 4.40 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.129 U µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Trichlorobiphenyls 19.3 µg/Kg 0.441 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 62.3 µg/Kg 0.0688 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Pentachlorobiphenyls 71.9 µg/Kg 0.0793 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Hexachlorobiphenyls 19.2 µg/Kg 0.126 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Heptachlorobiphenyls 8.00 µg/Kg 0.0688 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Octachlorobiphenyls 1.29 µg/Kg 0.0628 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Nonachlorobiphenyls 2.16 µg/Kg 0.160 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.0748 U µg/Kg 0.0748 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Total Homologs 184 µg/Kg 0.0748 µg/Kg10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Percent Lipids 1.8 % 0.1 %10/4/2001 Comp of Sta 12 (vole) 614851 4790327 12 0308032-07 Percent Moisture 74.1 % 0.1 %
10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl2-BZ#8 0.122 U µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl3-BZ#18 0.271 U µg/Kg 0.271 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl3-BZ#31/#28 21.3 µg/Kg 1.95 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#44 1.69 µg/Kg 0.186 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#45 0.248 U µg/Kg 0.248 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#47 5.08 µg/Kg 0.315 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#49 3.15 µg/Kg 0.154 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#52 6.66 µg/Kg 0.176 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#56 6.44 µg/Kg 0.0921 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#66 15.7 µg/Kg 0.123 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#70 3.45 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#74 11.3 µg/Kg 0.190 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#77 0.170 U µg/Kg 0.170 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl4-BZ#81 0.169 U µg/Kg 0.169 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#87 2.24 µg/Kg 0.0751 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#95 1.01 µg/Kg 0.0581 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 4 of 6
10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#99 4.49 µg/Kg 0.0397 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#101 2.64 µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#105 4.37 µg/Kg 0.0553 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#110 1.25 µg/Kg 0.108 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#114 0.574 µg/Kg 0.0496 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#118 7.14 µg/Kg 0.116 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#123 0.0978 U µg/Kg 0.0978 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl5-BZ#126 0.0865 U µg/Kg 0.0865 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#128 0.489 µg/Kg 0.0780 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#138 2.47 µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#146 0.780 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#149 0.432 J µg/Kg 0.0907 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#151 0.262 J µg/Kg 0.150 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#153 2.40 µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#156 0.517 µg/Kg 0.0921 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#157 0.128 J µg/Kg 0.0723 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#158 0.128 J µg/Kg 0.0610 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#167 0.269 J µg/Kg 0.0780 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl6-BZ#169 0.251 U µg/Kg 0.251 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#170 0.292 U µg/Kg 0.292 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#174 0.0595 U µg/Kg 0.0595 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#177 0.368 J µg/Kg 0.0836 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#180 1.21 µg/Kg 0.125 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#183 0.149 J µg/Kg 0.0567 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#187 1.05 µg/Kg 0.0624 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl7-BZ#189 0.112 U µg/Kg 0.112 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl8-BZ#194 0.333 J µg/Kg 0.130 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl8-BZ#195 0.129 U µg/Kg 0.129 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl8-BZ#201 0.113 U µg/Kg 0.113 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl9-BZ#206 0.312 J µg/Kg 0.152 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Cl10-BZ#209 0.0709 U µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Monochlorobiphenyls 4.17 U µg/Kg 4.17 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Dichlorobiphenyls 0.122 U µg/Kg 0.122 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Trichlorobiphenyls 17.8 µg/Kg 0.418 µg/Kg
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 5 of 6
10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Tetrachlorobiphenyls 65.4 µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Pentachlorobiphenyls 44.5 µg/Kg 0.0751 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Hexachlorobiphenyls 9.68 µg/Kg 0.119 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Heptachlorobiphenyls 7.34 µg/Kg 0.0652 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Octachlorobiphenyls 0.206 J µg/Kg 0.0595 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Nonachlorobiphenyls 0.312 J µg/Kg 0.152 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Decachlorobiphenyl 0.0709 U µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Total Homologs 145 µg/Kg 0.0709 µg/Kg10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Percent Lipids 2.2 % 0.1 %10/10/2001 Comp of Sta 20 (vole) 609713 4741759 20 0308032-08 Percent Moisture 75.7 % 0.1 %
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 6 of 6
HUDSON RIVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R DA
TA R
EP
OR
T: SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK C
OL
LE
CT
ION
, AN
AL
YSIS O
F
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, AN
D R
E-AN
AL
YSIS O
F SE
LE
CT F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS A
ND
SM
AL
L MA
MM
AL
S
APPENDIX F
SOIL AND SHREW (2000) DATA SHEETS
F1: 2000 SOIL DATA SHEETS
F2: 2000 SHORT-TAILED SHREW TISSUE DATA SHEETS
HUDS
ON R
IVER
HUDSON RIVER DATA REPORT: SMALL MAMMALS AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK COLLECTION, ANALYSIS OF
FLOODPLAIN EARTHWORMS, AND RE-ANALYSIS OF SELECT FLOODPLAIN SOILS AND SMALL MAMMALS
HU
DSO
N R
IVE
R D
AT
A R
EP
OR
T: S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
AN
D A
ME
RIC
AN
WO
OD
CO
CK
CO
LL
EC
TIO
N, A
NA
LY
SIS
OF
FL
OO
DP
LA
IN E
AR
TH
WO
RM
S, A
ND
RE
-AN
AL
YSI
S O
F S
EL
EC
T F
LO
OD
PL
AIN
SO
ILS
AN
D S
MA
LL M
AM
MA
LS
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 1 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 2 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 3 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 4 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 5 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 6 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 7 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 8 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 9 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 10 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 11 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 12 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 13 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 14 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 15 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 16 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 17 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 18 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 19 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 20 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 21 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 22 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 23 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 24 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 25 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 26 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 27 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 28 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 29 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 30 of 31
2000 Soil Data Hudson NRDA Floodplain DatabaseVersion 2.0
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on DRY weight basis 31 of 31
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 1 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 2 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 3 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 4 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 5 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 6 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 7 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 8 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 9 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 10 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 11 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 12 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 13 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 14 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 15 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 16 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 17 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 18 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 19 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 20 of 21
1BZ#=PCB congener Ballschmiter & Zell number 2U=Non-detected result at the detection limit J/UJ=Estimated result or detection limit 3PCB results & detection limit reported on wet weight basis 21 of 21