Top Banner
Data Quality Evaluation & Orbit Identification from SCATTEROMETER Data Products Using Modern Computing Techniques By:- Mudit J Dholakia (14MTPOS001) Under the guidance of Dr. C K Bhensdadia(Head, Department of Computer Engineering, DDU-Nadiad) Mrs. Anuja Sharma (Scientist-’SF’, IAQD/SIPA/SPDCG/SAC/Ahmedabad)
75

Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Jan 21, 2018

Download

Data & Analytics

Mudit Dholakia
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Data Quality Evaluation & Orbit Identification from SCATTEROMETER Data Products Using

Modern Computing Techniques

By:- Mudit J Dholakia (14MTPOS001)

Under the guidance of

Dr. C K Bhensdadia(Head, Department of Computer Engineering, DDU-Nadiad)

Mrs. Anuja Sharma (Scientist-’SF’, IAQD/SIPA/SPDCG/SAC/Ahmedabad)

Page 2: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

Literature Survey

4

Proposal

5Implementation

5

Results

Conclusion

Page 3: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

Page 4: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Introduction

• SCATTEROMETER Overview

• Data Reception

• Data Products

• Data Quality Evaluation

Page 5: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

SCATTEROMETER Overview

Page 6: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Data Reception

• Data Product• Imaging Information• Non-Imaging Information

• Formats• HDF4/5• Network Common Data Form

(NetCDF) • High/Low Rate Picture Transmission

(H/LRPT)

• Measurements for Direct Ambiguity removal• Inner/Outer fore/aft

Page 7: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Data Products

A systematic collection of near real-time data for the purpose of Retrospective analysis.[21]

Page 8: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Data Quality Evaluation

Page 9: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Data Quality Evaluation

Page 10: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

Page 11: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Problem

• Level wise difference

• Mathematical Model

• DQE

• Problem Statement &Objectives

Page 12: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Level wise difference

• Digital Geometry • Level-wise difference

281(HH)/282(VV)

61

03

32 samples

1 pixelDump wise

Level-0

Orbit-1

Orbit-2

Orbit-3

Orbit-4

Orbit wiseLevel-1

Page 13: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Mathematical Model

Page 14: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

DQE

• Minimum

• Maximum

• Mean

• Histogram

• Pattern Identification

• Matching

• Digital Elevation Model

• Scattrometric Analysis

Page 15: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Problem Statement & Objectives

• No ways to relate level-0 and level-1B data

• Retrospective analytical capability is absent.

• A DQE for Level-1B and Level-2A has to be developed.

• Level-0 DQE has to be fine tuned.

• It is mandatory to find the correct segments of orbits.

• Without using the meta information an anomaly free approach has to be driven.

• There has to some ways to artificially evaluate the orbit identification task.

Page 16: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

LiteratureSurvey

Page 17: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Literature Survey

• QUICKSAT-DQE

• Voyager-DQE

• RAPIDSCAT-DQE

• RISAT-DQE

• RESOURSESAT-DQE

Page 18: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

RISAT DQE

• Features• Parameter Evaluation

• Report Generation

• Alarm Generation

• Plots

• Parameter Extraction

• Missing Functions• Back-tracing

• Speedy Analysis

• Absence of modern computing approaches

• Lack of automation

[22]

Page 19: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

QuickSAT DQE

• Features• Automated system

• Sensor Performance Evaluation

• Digital Quality Checks

• Report Generation

• Parameter Extraction and range analysis

• Point Marking

• Missing Functions• Tabular Comparison

• Relational Analysis

• Multispectral function analysis

• Near real-time evaluation

[6]

Page 20: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

OSCAT & RAPIDSCAT DQE

• Features• Multispectral Analysis

• Display of SAR raw images

• Plots

• Retrospective Analysis

• Reports

• Alarms

• Missing Functions• Point Marking

• Back-tracing

• Relational Analysis

• Time wise analysis

• Effective Reports

[3],[23],[24],[25]

Page 21: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Literature Description Pros Cons

Wind Retrieval Functions[8]

A mathematical formulation of measurement of wind vector using standard deviation

Manual Evaluation,clea understanding

It is efficient but time consuming approach. Accuracy is very low. Requires Human efforts. No efficiency in Orbit identification.

Quick DQEJet Propulsion Laboratory[12]

Level wise wind vector and orbitidentification

Automatic and capable of change detection

Non-resusable,time consuming, complex to maintain

Automatic Weather Station[17] A configured system with orbit analysis

Accomodates accuracy and trend analysis

Error may occur while back tracing

Page 22: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Literature Description Pros Cons

Voyager DQE[11] Jupiter's geometry detection algorithm

Generalised Reference for ellipsoidal geometries (X,Y,Z)

3-D computations are highly complex and requires heavy resource

IBEX[13] Interstellar Boundary Explorer High efficiency

Orbit change detection without scientific backing is not reliable

OKID[14] Orbit identification Keysfor near surface windsAccuracy is best of its kind

Bigger the geometry higher the computation.

VirtulMeteorology[15] Automated accomodation of orbits

Used for scientific calibration

Not feasible fo real time evaluation

Page 23: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

LiteratureSurvey

4

Proposal

Page 24: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Proposal

• Orbit Identification(OI)• Fuzzy Logic based OI

• Pattern based OI

• DQE using flag bit-4• A neural network based approach

Page 25: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

Page 26: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Motivation for approach 1: Fuzzy

• OAT Derived Match data• Time

• Latitude

• Longitude

• Attitude

• Roll

• Pich

• Yaw

• Position(x,y,z)

• Velocity(x,y,z)

Page 27: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Motivation for approach 1: Fuzzy

Page 28: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Motivation for approach 1: Fuzzy

Page 29: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Orbit Identification using fuzzy logic[18]

Page 30: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Boon of the approach

Page 31: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Consideration of South pole crossing

Page 32: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Pattern based Orbit Identification

Page 33: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Overview

• Pattern Based Identification is used for automatic retrieval of orbits from SAR images depending upon contents of images known as features (i.e. a black chirp in the proposed case).

• Scanning consideration describes the process of accessing the interested patterns.

• Simplicity of Action is the outcome of the proposal.

Page 34: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Analysis of Signal Images

Page 35: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Proposal of Identification• A normal C program with I/O & file

operations.

• Scanning Geometry• Pixels in beams

• Number of scans

• Asymptotic Complexity• O(m*n)

• m is number of scans

• n is number of pixels per scan

Page 36: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Flag Based DQE(Neural Network Based DQE)

Page 37: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Globe according to flag bit-4

Page 38: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

A grid of 2 classes

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

111

1

11

1

11

1

1

1

22

2

2

22

22

2 22

22

2 22 2

2

2

22 2

2

2

22

22

22 2

22

2

2 2 2 2222

22

2

2

2

2

Page 39: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

LiteratureSurvey

4

Proposal

5

Implementation

Page 40: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Implementation

• Prerequisites

• Experiment-1 • Fuzzy logic based OI

• Experiment-2• Pattern Based OI

• Experiment-3• Flag DQE using Artificial Neural

Network

Page 41: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Prerequisites

• Matlab R2013a

• JDK+Netbeans

• C editor & compiler

• Jasper Engine

• HDFView

Page 42: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

• If time1 then orbit1

• If time2 then orbit2

• If time3 then orbit3

• If time4 then orbit4

• If time5 then orbit5

*Using north pole crossing time

Page 43: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

Page 44: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

• If time1 then orbit1

• If time2 then orbit2

*Using equator crossing time

Page 45: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

Page 46: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

• If time1 then orbit1

• If time2 then orbit2

• If time3 then orbit3

*Using south pole crossing time

Page 47: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-1Fuzzy Logic based Orbit Identification

Page 48: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-2Pattern based Orbit Identification

Sensor Signal Data Orbit Count ProgramResultant Fine-tuned

Orbit Statistics

Page 49: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Experiment-3Neural Network Based DQE

Page 50: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

Literature Survey

4

Proposal

5Implementation

5

Results

Page 51: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Results

• Pattern based Orbit Identification

• Neural Network based DQE

• Retrospective GRID-GUI

• Added clarity to reports

Page 52: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Pattern Based Orbit Identification Results

Page 53: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Neural Network based DQEResults

Page 54: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Retrospective GRID-UI

Page 55: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Retrospective GRID-UI

Page 56: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Clarity in Reports

Page 57: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Clarity in Reports

Page 58: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Clarity in binning

Page 59: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Clarity in binning

Page 60: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Overall System Overview

Page 61: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Statistics

Page 62: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Presentation Roadmap

1

Introduction

2

Problem

3

Literature Survey

4

Proposal

5Implementation

5

Results

Conclusion

Page 63: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Conclusion

• Conclusion

• Future work

• Bibliography

Page 64: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Conclusion

• A Fuzzy Logic(FL) based orbit identification(OI) has been proposed in this work. To select theattributes a preprocessed data set of Orbit Attitude Records are selected assuming extraction ofLevel-0 and some processing steps have already been performed. Selection of time and latitudehas been justified using Geo-mathematical criteria. Then a short introduction to fuzzy systems isgiven and using that approach the idea is implemented using matlab. This work has made a markin Data Quality Evaluation Modeling. This work is useful for the researchers to develop themodern terrain clustering systems.

• In traditional systems this redundancy leads to waste of computational efforts. Instead, thisapproach provides past knowledge, using which the new data can be segmented as well asanalyzed (using further integration) and improvements to the upcoming observation systems canbe carried-out. Moreover, it also reduces modeling complexity to compute the correlationbetween two images based on geometry, i.e. existing image of DQE and the image which iscurrently computed. It also improves the speed of a spatial data analysis system. Using secondapproach also orbit identification task has been implemented with modeling complexity of O(n).This makes a clear sense to computational geo-informatics about the patterns which areimportant aspect of consideration which was neglected earlier. Binning also improves theanalytical standard for the better understanding of anomalies in data , indirectly in sensors.

Page 65: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Conclusion

• At the end work has been concluded with the initial startup for futurework, i.e. Neural Network based DQE. The Neural Network basedapproach has been tested on randomly selected data products fromthe source NRSC even though surveying the current system with bestaccuracy. Making some more efforts towards the highest accuracythis approach also can show at least a technique other thanconventional technique of flag based DQE . Concluding with theretrospective DQE implementation to bridge the gap described inproblem definition this work encourages many researchers to workfor DQE and OI using modern computing techniques.

Page 66: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Future Work

• General Model Development

• Applicability to wider scope can be designed

• No parallel processes have been defined, thus work can be initiatedfor such faster models

• GRID_UI needs many improvements for the final application, i.e.deliverable

• More powerful soft computing with highest accuracy can be used forbetterment of DQE system.

Page 67: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Paper:1

A Novel Approach of Orbit Identification from Level-0 Data based on Level-1B convention for Scatterometer

using Fuzzy LogicMudit J Dholakia, Anuja Sharma, Dr. C. K. Bhensdadia

XPLORE COMPLIANT ISBN :- 978-1-4673-7807-9CD ISBN:- 978-1-4673-7805-5

PRINT ISBN :- 978-1-4673-7806-2

IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL (ISCO)KARPAGAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING ,COIMBATORE,TAMIL NADU

Page 68: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Paper:2

Pattern Based Orbit Identification for SCATTEROMETER Level-0 Signal Images

Mudit J Dholakia, Anuja Sharma, Dr. C. K. Bhensdadia

Journal title: Procedia Computer Science

DOI information: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.049

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND VIRTUALIZATION (ICCCV)

THAKUR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,KANDIVALI,MUMBAI,MAHARASHTRA

IN ASSOCIATION WITH ELSEVIER PROCEEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE ,ELSEVIER B.V. AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

Page 69: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Paper:3

Analytical Approach for identification of orbits from

SCATTEROMETER Level-0 Noise ImagesMudit J Dholakia, Anuja Sharma, Dr. C. K. Bhensdadia

International Journal of Applied Information Systems (IJAIS) – ISSN : 2249-086803.049

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND VIRTUALIZATION (ICCCV)

THAKUR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,KANDIVALI,MUMBAI,MAHARASHTRA

IN ASSOCIATION WITH ELSEVIER PROCEEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE ,ELSEVIER B.V. AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

Page 70: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Paper:4

Pattern Based Orbit Identification for SCATTEROMETER Level-0 Signal Echo Window Images

Mudit J Dholakia, Anuja Sharma, Dr. C. K. Bhensdadia

Xplore ISBN:- 978-1-4673-8208-3DVD ISBN:- 978-1-4673-8207-6

IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICIIECS)

KARPAGAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, COIMBATORE ,TAMIL NADU

Page 71: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Paper:5

Land-Sea Classification using Machine Learning Technique for SCATTEROMETER L1B Globe

Mudit J Dholakia, Anuja Sharma, Dr. C. K. Bhensdadia

Number by ACM – ICPS for Proceeding Volume: 978-1-4503-4213-1049

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND VIRTUALIZATION (ICCCV)

THAKUR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,KANDIVALI,MUMBAI,MAHARASHTRA

IN ASSOCIATION WITH ELSEVIER PROCEEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE ,ELSEVIER B.V. AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

Page 72: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

BibliographyBOOKS:-

Joseph, George. Fundamentals of remote sensing. UniversitiesPress, 2005.

Calla, O. P. N. "Study of Ocean using Indian Space BorneMicrowave Sensors." IJCST 2.4 (2011).

Simpson, John E. Sea breeze and local winds. CambridgeUniversity Press, 1994.

Tobler, W. R. "Cellular geography." Philosophy in geography.Springer Netherlands, 1979. 379-386.

Toolbox, Fuzzy Logic. "User's Guide of Matlab. The Mathworks."Inc.(1995-2009) (1995).

Zadeh, Lofti A. "Fuzzy logic." Computer 4 (1988): 83-93.

Chapman, Stephen. MATLAB programming for engineers.Cengage Learning,2007.

Cormen, Thomas H. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press, 2009.

Brassard, Gilles, and Paul Bratley. Fundamentals of algorithmics.Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.

WEB:-

Dholakia, Mudit. "Muditdholakia/muditdholakia.github.io."GitHub. 1 Oct. 2015. Web. 30 Oct. 2015

ISRO, NRSC. "National Remote Sensing Centre." NationalRemote Sensing Centre. ISRO. Web. 25 Nov. 2015

Dutch, Steven. "Converting UTM to latitude and longitude (orvice versa)." Natural and Applied Sciences, University ofWisconsin-Green Bay, http://www .uwgb. edu/dutchs/Use-fulData/UTMFormulas. HTM (2007).

PAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Spencer, Michael W., Chialin Wu, and David G. Long. "Improvedresolution backscat- ter measurements with the SeaWindspencil-beam scatterometer." Geoscience and Remote Sensing,IEEE Transactions on 38.1 (2000): 89-104.

SCATTEROMETER Payload Design Team-ISRO. "OCEANSAT-IISCATTEROMETER PAYLOAD PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEWDOCUMENT." SAC-ISRO, 2005

Parmar, R. M., et al. "OCEANSAT 2: mission and its applications."Asia-Pacic Remote Sensing Symposium. International Society forOptics and Photonics, 2006.

Misra, Tapan, et al. "Oceansat-II Scatterometer: SensorPerformance Evaluation, Analyses, and Estimation of Biases."Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 52.6(2014): 3310-3315.

Singh, Randhir, Prashant Kumar, and Pradip Kumar Pal."Assimilation of Oceansat-2-scatterometer-derived surfacewinds in the weather research and forecasting model." Geo-science and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 50.4 (2012):1015-1021.

Ebuchi, Naoto, Hans C. Graber, and Michael J. Caruso."Evaluation of wind vectors observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWindsusing ocean buoy data." Journal of Atmospheric and OceanicTechnology 19.12 (2002): 2049-2062.

Lindzen, Richard S., and Sumant Nigam. "On the role of seasurface temperature gradients in forcing low-level winds andconvergence in the tropics." Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences44.17 (1987): 2418-2436.

Folk, Mike, Robert E. McGrath, and Nancy Yeager. "HDF: anupdate and future directions." Geoscience and Remote SensingSymposium, 1999. IGARSS'99 Proceedings. IEEE 1999International. Vol. 1. IEEE, 1999.

Page 73: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

BibliographyPAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Mujiasih, Subekti, and Eko Prasetyo. "Preliminary Study ofSpatial Verication for Wind Model Output Against Oceansat-2Satellite." IPTEK The Journal for Technology and Science 25.2(2015).

Stoelen, Ad, and Anton Verhoef. "Validation of Oceansat-2scatterometer data." the P. 59 EUMETSAT MeteorologicalSatellite Conference. 2011.

Narayanan, M. S., and Abhijit Sarkar. "Observations of MarineAtmosphere from Indian Oceansat-1." Proceedings from the.2001.

Bozoki, Eva, and Aharon Friedman. "Optimization method fororbit correction in accelerators." Particle AcceleratorConference, 1993., Proceedings of the 1993. IEEE, 1993.

Takahashi, Satoshi, and B. Ghosh. "Canonical forms and orbitidentication problems in machine vision." IEEE CONFERENCE ONDECISION AND CONTROL. Vol. 5. IEEE; 1998, 2000.

Campbell, James K., Stephen P. Synnott, and Gerald J. Bierman."Voyager orbit determination at Jupiter." Automatic Control,IEEE Transactions on 28.3 (1983): 256-268.

Miao-Fen, Huang, et al. "Study on data models of image qualityassessment for the Chinese-Brazil earth resources satellite."Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2004. IGARSS'04.Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International. Vol. 6. IEEE, 2004.

Kukar, Matja. "Transduction and typicalness for qualityassessment of individual classications in machine learning anddata mining." Data Mining, 2004. ICDM'04. Fourth IEEEInternational Conference on. IEEE, 2004.

PAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Huddleston, James N., and Michael W. Spencer. "SeaWinds: theQuikSCAT wind scatterometer." Aerospace Conference, 2001,IEEE Proceedings.. Vol. 4. IEEE, 2001.

Huddleston, James N., et al. "SeaWinds on QuikSCAT: Postlaunchcalibration and validation." Geoscience and Remote SensingSymposium, 2000. Proceedings. IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000International. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2000.

Long, David G., and Michael W. Spencer. "Performance analysisfor the SeaWinds scatterometer." Geoscience and RemoteSensing Symposium, 1996. IGARSS'96.'Remote Sensing for aSustainable Future.', International. Vol. 3. IEEE, 1996.

Wu, C., et al. "The SeaWinds scatterometer instrument."Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1994. IGARSS'94.Surface and Atmospheric Remote Sensing: Technologies, DataAnalysis and Interpretation., International. Vol. 3. IEEE, 1994.

Kumar, Ravindra, et al. "Evaluation of Oceansat-2-derived oceansurface winds using observations from global buoys and otherscatterometers." Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEETransactions on 51.5 (2013): 2571-2576.

Fore, Alexander G., et al. "Point-wise wind retrieval andambiguity removal improvements for the QuikSCATclimatological data set." Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEETransactions on 52.1 (2014): 51-59.

Bhowmick, Suchandra Aich, and Ravindra Kumar. "Crosscalibration of the OceanSAT-2 scatterometer with QuikSCATscatterometer using natural terrestrial targets." Geoscience andRemote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 52.6 (2014): 3393-3398.

PAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Richter, R. "On the in-ight absolute calibration of high spatialresolution spaceborne sensors using small ground targets."International Journal of Remote Sensing 18.13 (1997): 2827-2833.

Richter, Rudolf, et al. "Evaluation of the IRS-1B inight calibrationcampaign (1995).“ AeroSense'97. International Society forOptics and Photonics, 1997.

Atlas, Robert, et al. "A cross-calibrated, multiplatform oceansurface wind velocity product for meteorological andoceanographic applications." Bulletin of the AmericanMeteorological Society 92.2 (2011): 157-174.

Yang, Z., et al. "Association rule mining-based dissolved gasanalysis for fault diagnosis of power transformers." Systems,Man, and Cybernetics,Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEETransactions on 39.6 (2009):597-610.

Mendel, Jerry M (1995). Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: atutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83, 345-377.

Yu, Yiming, and Eddie R. Fowler. "Rule based fuzzy logicinferencing." Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994. Humans,Information and Technology., 1994 IEEE InternationalConference on. Vol. 1. IEEE, 1994.

Guillemin, Pierre. "Fuzzy logic applied to motor control."Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on 32.1 (1996): 51-56.

Chen, B., and L. L. Hoberock. "A fuzzy neural networkarchitecture for fuzzy control and classication." NeuralNetworks, 1996., IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE,1996.

Spencer, Michael W., James N. Huddleston, and Bryan W. Stiles."Advanced design concepts for a SeaWinds scatterometerfollow-on mission." Aerospace Conference, 2001, IEEEProceedings.. Vol. 4. IEEE, 2001.

Page 74: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

BibliographyPAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Su, Te-Jen, et al. "Fuzzy theory application to the satellite antenna controller." Information Science, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (ISEEE), 2014 International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2014.

Chapman, Stephen. MATLAB programming for engineers. Cengage Learning,2007.

PAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Horstmann, Jochen, Susanne Lehner, and Helmut Schiller."Global wind speed retrieval from complex SAR data usingscatterometer models and neural networks." Geoscience andRemote Sensing Symposium, 2001. IGARSS'01. IEEE 2001International. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2001.

Xu, Lingyu, and Jun Xu. "Satellite remote sensing SST qualityevaluation based on consensus measurement." WebInformation Systems and Mining, 2009. WISM 2009.International Conference on. IEEE, 2009.

Huang, Yi-Ting, and Fan-Tien Cheng. "Automatic data qualityevaluation for the AVM system." Semiconductor Manufacturing,IEEE Transactions on 24.3 (2011): 445-454.

Yang, Xiaofeng, et al. "Validation of sea surface wind vecterretrieval from China's HY- 2A Scatterometer." Geoscience andRemote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2013 IEEE International.IEEE, 2013.

SCATSAT-1 SAC TEAM. "SCATSAT-1 SCATTEROMETER DATAPRODUCTS SYSTEM SAC ELEMENTS PRELIMINARY DESIGNREVIEW DOCUMENT." SAC-ISRO, 2014

Research Areas Of SAC. 1st ed. SAC, 2015. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.

ISRO, SAC. Remote Sensing Data Products & RetrievalAlgorithms. 4th ed. ISRO, 2013. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.

Klir, George, and Bo Yuan. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Vol. 4. NewJersey: Prentice Hall, 1995.

Giannini, Judith A., and Charles C. Kilgus. "A fuzzy logic techniquefor correcting climatological ionospheric models." Geoscienceand Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 35.2 (1997): 470-474.

PAPERS & ARTICLES:-

Shekoofa, Omid, and Mohsen Taherbaneh. "Power sourcessizing in electrical power sub system design based on orbitparameters change in LEO satellites." Recent Advances in SpaceTechnologies, 2009. RAST'09. 4th International Conference on.IEEE, 2009.

Ivan, Cosmin. "Applications of nonlinear time-series analysis inunstable periodic orbits identication-Chaos control in buckconverter." Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2009. ISSCS 2009.International Symposium on. IEEE, 2009.

Almenar, C. Cuenca, et al. "ATLAS online data qualitymonitoring." Real Time Conference (RT), 2010 17th IEEE-NPSS.IEEE, 2010.

Peterson, Joseph G., et al. "Science operations support for theorbit change on the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX)mission." Aerospace Conference, 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 2012.

Hongjun, Wang, Wang Hongfeng, and Ji Yongjian. "Orbitidentication method based on ISOMAP for rotor system faultdiagnosis." Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI),2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2013.

Peng, Ding, et al. "On-orbit identifcation and active vibrationsuppression for exible spacecraft." Mechatronic Sciences,Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC), Proceedings 2013International Conference on. IEEE, 2013.

Magnell, B. A., et al. "Current Measurements from a Deep Real-Time Metocean Mooring: Lessons Learned on Real-Time DataQA/QC.“

Palsule, S. S., et al. "Resourcesat-1 data quality evaluationsystem." International Journal of Applied Earth Observation andGeoinformation 10.2 (2008): 147-158.

Page 75: Data quality evaluation & orbit identification from scatterometer

Thank You!