Top Banner
DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS Bryan Jones CUNY Institute for Demographic Research Towards Scenarios of US Demographic Change June 24, 2014
12

DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Jun 03, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL

POPULATION PROJECTIONS

Bryan Jones

CUNY Institute for Demographic Research

Towards Scenarios of US Demographic Change

June 24, 2014

Page 2: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Overview

• BIG topic - data issues will vary with methodology and context of application/research question.

• Consider both inputs and outputs.

• Degree of modeling/use of ancillary data.

• Types of data; geographic, demographic, socio-economic, remotely sensed.

2000 Observed 2100 Predicted

A2 Scenario

Page 3: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Existing Large-Scale Methods •Proportional scaling (Gaffin et al., 2004; Bengtsson et al., 2006; van Vuuren et al., 2007)

•Trend extrapolation (Balk et al., 2005; Hachadoorian et al., 2011)

•Hybrid/Economic (Asadoorian, 2005; Nam and Reilly, 2012)

•Gravity-based (Grübler et al., 2007; Jones and O’Neil, 2013)

•Hybrid/Smart Interpolation (e.g., EPA, 2010)

NCAR A2 Scenario, 2100 EPA A2 Scenario, 2100

Page 4: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

• Tradeoff between resolution and uncertainty.

• Demographers will argue that it is not advisable to project certain demographic and socio-economic variables at high resolution.

• Artificial precision

• Different processes operate at different scales.

• Suitability for research.

Scale and Resolution

Page 5: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

• Endogeneity

• Gridded data – gridding process

• Consistency across space and scale

• Projectability of inputs

Other Challenges to Consider

• Impact of scale on spatial outcomes - migration

• Quality of migration data

• Vulnerability and exposure to climate hazards

• Coastal change

• Night lights

• Urban people and urban land

Page 6: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Projected Population by Distance-to-Coast: Florida (2000-2100)

Page 7: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Wyoming to Rest of USAOne-Year Age Cohorts: 2005

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Age Cohort

Sij

(x)

ACS Migration Data

Rogers and Jones, 2008

Wyoming to Rest of USAACS 2005

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Age Cohort

Pro

pen

sit

y

Observed

Fitted

Page 8: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Vulnerability and Exposure to Climate Hazards

2.3 billion person days

• Exposure is projected to increase anywhere from 3.3 to 4.9 times observed levels.

• Projecting vulnerability more challenging.

9.8 billion person days

Page 9: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Coastal Change

Page 10: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Night Lights

NASA Earth Observatory and NOAA National Geophysical Data Center

Source: NASA Earth Observatory and NOAA National Geophysical Data Center

Page 11: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Urban Population & Urban Land

Page 12: DATA CHALLENGES FOR SPATIAL POPULATION PROJECTIONS · ACS Migration Data Rogers and Jones, 2008 Wyoming to Rest of USA ACS 2005 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25

Conclusions

• There are significant data challenges when

constructing spatial population scenarios/projections.

• However, there are things we think can do well already.

• Total numbers

• Scenario space

• A greater understanding of the multi-level processes that drive spatial population change is necessary.