Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009 Dark Current Simulation for the T18vg2.6 Structure Zenghai Li , Arno Candel, Lixin Ge SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory CLIC Workshop, Oct 14, 2009, CERN * Work supported by U.S. DOE ASCR, BES & HEP Divisions under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515
24
Embed
Dark Current Simulation for the T18vg2.6 Structure
Dark Current Simulation for the T18vg2.6 Structure. Zenghai Li , Arno Candel, Lixin Ge SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory CLIC Workshop, Oct 14, 2009, CERN. * Work supported by U.S. DOE ASCR, BES & HEP Divisions under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. Outline. T18vg2.6 Dark Current Simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Dark Current Simulation for the T18vg2.6 Structure
Zenghai Li, Arno Candel, Lixin Ge
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
CLIC Workshop, Oct 14, 2009, CERN
* Work supported by U.S. DOE ASCR, BES & HEP Divisions under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Outline
T18vg2.6 Dark Current Simulation
Dark current spectrum vs measurement
Field emitter modeling
- PIC simulation of emitter emission (Arno’s talk)
- Emitter heating due to emission current
- Emitter heating due to RF field enhancement
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
T18vg2.6 Structure
• Structure being tested at KEK and SLAC• Simulation Code: (ACE3P)
t y(x) = a x^na = 0.21073n = 1.4129R = 0.88267 (lin)
F. Wang
• Breakdown rate significantly higher at the output end
• Good correlation with field enhancement and dark current heating at the output end
KEK, Higo, Doebert
Red: real cell timingBlue: linear cell timing
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Dark Current Measurement & Simulation
Schematic of KEK high power test and dark current measurement
GVGVPM PMAM
Sl i t
FC
E
E
I P
Louni nel oad
Otsukal oad
DC
I PH
VAC
I nsulVAC
I PDC H
H
Vari an I P
187
KX03 425
FC
I P
Load
Vari anI P
Q-mass
WC WCFC
FC
VAC DC
230
Faraday Cup to measure dark current
dE/E filter
slitSimulation “schematics”
Dipole (dP/P)
T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2Dark current spectra measured 18 June 2009
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Spectrum_vs_Width at 64MW
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 113ns, 64MW
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 331ns
I_slit peak [microA]
pc (MeV/c)
090618
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 5 10 15
T18_VG2.4_Disk #2Spectrum_vs_power at 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 64MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 55MW, 252ns
I_slit_peak [microA] 70MW, 252ns
I_slit peak [microA]
pc (MeV/c)
090618
Dependence on power Dependence on width
Higo 090703Measurement Data at KEK (Higo)
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Dark Current Spectrum Comparison
Measured dark current energy spectrum at downstream
SimulationEacc=97MV/m.dE/E=0.1, zbp=2.9m
Differences?Measured dark current spectrum details would depend on the number of emitters on the disks
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Heating Due to Dark Current Impact ?
Disk 10
Disk 17
• Dark Current Collimation By Disk Iris. • Some electrons have very high impact energies.
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Electron Impact Energy
Emitted from disk 3
Emitted from disk 17
Emitted from disk 10
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Impact Energy vs Emission Site Field
E field determined amount of emission
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Heating Due to Dark Current Impact• Field emission current density based on FN can be significant
- with beta=50, Eacc=100 MV/m,- Jpeak ~1013 A/m2
• Need to study effects of individual emitters - PIC simulation of initial emitter phase space
Emitter - micron or less in size
• MeV energy electrons• Larger spot and deep depth
localized heating may not be as significant
• Current may be much higher when breakdown is being developed? site of future emitter?
Sharon Lee ICSE2006
Colored by momentum
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
“Modeling” Of Field Emitters
(C. Adolphsen)
G. A. Mesyats /P. Wilson
cone double tipasperities
• Calculate field enhancement beta of emitter protrusion• PIC simulation: FN + self consistent space charge effect
– Using a emitter shape with right beta vale (50 as measured)– Initial emitter phase space – impact heating distribution– Emission current - emission heating of emitter
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Single Tip: Beta vs Shape
Field contour plot
Field enhancement beta vs tip elongate ratio and tip length
emission heating In high E region, strong E force pull
the tip outward– may result in development of
“sharp” emitters over time– lead to breakdown when dark
current and dark current heating exceed threshold
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
NLC H60VG3S17 Structure
H60VG3S17 Gradient
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
0 20 40 60Cell number
G, E
s (G
_a
ve=
70
MV
/m)
H60VG3A17 DS Pulse Heating
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60Cell number
dT
(d
eg
C)
Surface Field RF Heating
Peak Surface Field & Heating• Surface E field and RF heating higher at the output end• Most breakdowns in the front
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
NLC H60VG3S17 Structure
• Surface field along disk contour• Disk 8 and 50 comparison (same acceleration gradient)
Zenghai Li Oct 13, 2009
Summary
Progress being made in simulating CLIC T18 structures using Track3P. Dark current spectrum compared with measurement – which may provide information of field emission conditions of disks
Both RF and field emission contribute to emitter heating– High temperature plus strong E force pulling (of emitter
tip) could lead to development of “sharp” emitters over time, may eventually reach breakdown threshold
Self consistent (space charge) emitter emission being performed using PIC to study emission heating
Surface field enhancement due emitter protrusion being calculated using Omega3P to study RF heating
Detailed of modeling of field emitters in progress