Danger in the Water
Theodore MarrasMD FRCPC
University of Toronto&
University Health Network
Potential conflicts of interestFinancial – noneOther – clinical and academic interest in
pulmonary NTM disease (especially epidemiology, long term outcomes)
Off label use of therapiesNone of the medications mentioned have a
formal indication for the treatment of pulmonary NTM disease
Declarations
1. Identify relevant potential infective exposures
2. Review management of pMAC:– Recommended drug treatment
– Approach to comprehensive management
3. Review data on treatment outcomes
4. Combining knowledge of:– Environment / interventions (relevance, uncertainty)
– Treatment outcomes
… to better inform clinical decisions
Objectives- Pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (pMAC)
Background
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis Micro + Micro
Pulmonary NTM- Microbiology
NTM M.tb.
Where they live Environment (water, soil)
Infected host
Infection Environmental exposure / inoculation
Infective aerosols
Spread person-person?
No Yes
Pathogenic Weakly Strongly
Diagnosis Micro / Clin / Rad Micro
“Disease” Criteria
Clinical Pulmonary symptoms, or
Nodules or cavities on CXR, or
Multifocal bronchiectasis & multiple small nodules on HRCT
(and exclusion of other diagnoses)
Micro With > 2 sputa 2 cultures +
With 1 BAL/wash 1 BAL/wash +
With biopsy • 1 biopsy culture +, or• 1 culture + and bx evidence of disease
Pulmonary NTM Disease- ATS / IDSA 2007
Age and sex distribution
Increasingly common disease of the elderly
in Ontario
Where does it come from?
• Moist environments– Natural and treated water– Soils
• Very disinfectant resistant
The Water we Drink- MAC
Hot Tub Lung:Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis to NTM
•Embil et al. Chest 1997 5
•Kahana et al. Chest 1997 1
•Mangione et al. Emerg Inf Dis 2001 5
•Case record NEJM 2000 1
•Khoor et al. Am J Clin Pathol 2001 10
•Rickman et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2002 2
•Cappelluti et al. Arch Intern Med 2003 1
•Pham et al. J Thoracic Imaging 2003 1
•Grimes et al. Respiration 2001 1
•Aksamit Respir Infect 2003 9
•Lumb et al. Appl Environ Micro 2004 4
•Systrom & Wittram NEJM 2005 1
TOTAL 41
Study Design
Pulmonary NTMSource of infection
… Multiple respiratory samples and shower and bathtub specimens grew MAC, with matching PFGE patterns…
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Reaction to Mycobacterium avium in Household Water*Theodore K. Marras, MD; Richard J. Wallace, Jr., MD, FCCP; Laura L. Koth, MD; Michael S. Stulbarg, MD;† Clayton T. Cowl,
MD, FCCP; and Charles L. Daley, MD
(CHEST 2005; 127:664–671)
Pulmonary NTMSource of infection
… M. avium isolated from showerhead water and biofilm in the home of a woman with M. avium disease. DNA fingerprinting demonstrated identical M. avium isolates from showerhead and patient …
Mycobacterium avium in a shower linked to pulmonary diseaseJoseph O. Falkinham III, Michael D. Iseman, Petra de Haas and Dick van Soolingen
J Water Health 06(2):209–213
Study DesignOccupational soil exposure - risk factor
for MAC skin test reactivity
MAC skin testing- Soil exposure
Study DesignOccupational soil exposure - risk factor
for MAC skin test reactivity
MAC skin testing- Soil exposure
Study Population Risk FactorOdds Ratio
(95% CI)P
value
ReedAm J Epi 2006
Random sample, West Palm Beach FL (N=447)
Soil occupation (> 6 years)
2.7(1.3-6.0)
0.01
KhanAJRCCM 2007
Representative sample, USA (N=7,384)
Farming / Construction
1.43(1.07-1.92)
0.02
Study DesignOccupational soil exposure - risk factor
for MAC skin test reactivity
MAC skin testing- Soil exposure
Study Population Risk FactorOdds Ratio
(95% CI)P
value
ReedAm J Epi 2006
Random sample, West Palm Beach FL (N=447)
Soil occupation (> 6 years)
2.7(1.3-6.0)
0.01
KhanAJRCCM 2007
Representative sample, USA (N=7,384)
Farming / Construction
1.43(1.07-1.92)
0.02
Study DesignOccupational soil exposure - risk factor
for MAC skin test reactivity
MAC skin testing- Soil exposure
Study Population Risk FactorOdds Ratio
(95% CI)P
value
ReedAm J Epi 2006
Random sample, West Palm Beach FL (N=447)
Soil occupation (> 6 years)
2.7(1.3-6.0)
0.01
KhanAJRCCM 2007
Representative sample, USA (N=7,384)
Farming / Construction
1.43(1.07-1.92)
0.02
High numbers of … M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. chelonae, recovered from aerosols produced by pouring commercial potting soil and potting soil samples provided by patients with pulmonary mycobacterial infections.
Dominant mycobacteria in soil samples corresponded to dominant species implicated clinically. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated a closely related pair of M. avium isolates recovered from a patient and from that patient’s own potting soil.
App Env Microbiol 2006; 72:7602-6.
Pulmonary NTMSource of infection
Management of pMAC
“Making the diagnosis of NTM lung disease does not, per se, necessitate the institution of therapy, which is a decision based on potential risks and benefits of therapy for individual patients”
- ATS / IDSA 2007
ATS / IDSA guidelines- Diagnosis Treatment
Symptoms + Imaging + Cultures
= NTM Disease
“Making the diagnosis of NTM lung disease does not, per se, necessitate the institution of therapy, which is a decision based on potential risks and benefits of therapy for individual patients”
- ATS / IDSA 2007
ATS / IDSA guidelines- Diagnosis Treatment
Symptoms + Imaging + Cultures
= NTM Disease
When to treat?Micro– Repeated isolates / AFB smear +
Symptoms– Systemic* – fatigue, fever/sweat, weight loss – Local – cough, sputum, hemoptysis, dyspnea
Significant burden on imaging– Consolidation, nodules, cavities …– Progression
Pulmonary NTM- Diagnosis Treatment
Non-destructive infection• CureLocalized destruction• Cure (?)Diffuse destruction• SuppressSevere drug intolerance• SuppressRecurrence• Cure or Suppress?
Pulmonary MAC- Goals of treatment
Non-destructive infection• CureLocalized destruction• Cure (?)Diffuse destruction• SuppressSevere drug intolerance• SuppressRecurrence• Cure or Suppress?
Pulmonary MAC- Goals of treatment
Non-destructive infection• CureLocalized destruction• Cure (?)Diffuse destruction• SuppressSevere drug intolerance• SuppressRecurrence• Cure or Suppress?
Pulmonary MAC- Goals of treatment
Non-destructive infection• CureLocalized destruction• Cure (?)Diffuse destruction• SuppressSevere drug intolerance• SuppressRecurrence• Cure or Suppress?
Pulmonary MAC- Goals of treatment
Non-destructive infection• CureLocalized destruction• Cure (?)Diffuse destruction• SuppressSevere drug intolerance• SuppressRecurrence• Cure or Suppress?
Pulmonary MAC- Goals of treatment
ATS / IDSA guidelines- Drug treatment – MAC
Drug / classDisease type
Fibronodular Cavitary or Advanced / recurrent
MACROLIDEClari 1000 tiw or
Azi 500-600 tiw
Clari 500-1000 qd
or
Azi 250-300 qd
Ethambutol 20-25 mg/kg tiw 15 mg/kg/d
Rifamycin RMP 600 tiw
RMP 450-600 qd
or
RFB 150-300 qd
Amikacin (SM, KM)
Not recommendedConsider / recommended
(10-15 mg/kg/d)
ATS / IDSA guidelines- Drug treatment – MAC
Drug / classDisease type
Fibronodular Cavitary or Advanced / recurrent
MACROLIDEClari 1000 tiw or
Azi 500-600 tiw
Clari 500-1000 qd
or
Azi 250-300 qd
Ethambutol 20-25 mg/kg tiw 15 mg/kg/d
Rifamycin RMP 600 tiw
RMP 450-600 qd
or
RFB 150-300 qd
Amikacin (SM, KM)
Not recommendedConsider / recommended
(10-15 mg/kg/d)
Other agents - Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, linezolid
When to stop?Sputum cultures negative for 12 months
Pulmonary NTM- Treatment duration
Comprehensive management
• Start with guidelines• Expect drug intolerance (staggered start)• Macrolides whenever possible• Amikacin for advanced cases*• Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, linezolid as needed /
tolerated• Aim for >3 drugs*
– More drugs, higher doses greater efficacy
• Tailor therapy– Switch drugs to minimize AE’s– Re-evaluate objectives based on response, toxicity
* When treating intensively
Pulmonary MAC- Drugs
Other interventions• Nutrition• Bronchodilators /
Inhaled steroids?• Pulmonary hygiene• Surgery• Avoid exposure
– Hot tubs– Shower?
Pulmonary MAC- Treatment – Other
Other interventions• Nutrition• Bronchodilators /
Inhaled steroids?• Pulmonary hygiene• Surgery• Avoid exposure
– Hot tubs– Shower?
Pulmonary MAC- Treatment – Other
Other interventions• Nutrition• Bronchodilators /
Inhaled steroids?• Pulmonary hygiene• Surgery• Avoid exposure
– Hot tubs– Shower?
Pulmonary MAC- Treatment – Other
Other interventions• Nutrition• Bronchodilators /
Inhaled steroids?• Pulmonary hygiene• Surgery (?)
Pulmonary MAC- Treatment – Other
Pulmonary MAC- Following patients on therapy
Assess responseMicrobiologic – sputum q 2-4 monthsClinical – periodicRadiographic – LDCT scan 4-6 mo, then q 6-12 mo
Follow for drug toxicities• Education important toxicity stop drugs• Clinical• Rifamycin CBC, liver tests• Ethambutol visual acuity, colour etc.• Amikacin ‘lytes, creatinine, serum level, audiograms
Outcomes
Clinical practice (geographic region)• Leeds, UK; MAC 1999-2001
• 41% disease recurrence or mortality at 2 years post treatment
Henry, ERJ 2004
pNTM – a chronic disease?- Clinical practice
Clinical practice (specialty clinic)• 50% didn’t achieve sputum culture
conversion
• 60% didn’t tolerate initial antibiotics
• 85% remain symptomaticHuang, Chest
1999
pNTM – a chronic disease?- Clinical practice
Study Rx (months)
N Sputum convert (%) Success (%)
PP ITT PP ITT
Dautzenberg ’95 12 39 77 65 77 65
Wallace ’96 > 5 48 97 75 86 67
Roussel ‘98 15 29 67 48 57 41
Griffith ’98 > 6 68 66 56 66 56
Tanaka ’99 6 46 72 61 63 48
Huang ’99 >12 27 71 37 36 19
Griffith ‘00 > 6 59 78 54 78 54
Griffith ‘01 12 103 61 54 61 54
Field ’02 > 5 30 100 87 81 70
Kobashi ‘03 12 71 58 58 32 32
Fujikane ’05 >6 137 97 79 82 66
Lam ’06 12 91 21 13 83 53
Kobashi ’07 24 73 57 51 14 12
Kobashi ’07 24 146 61 61 18 18
Jenkins ’08 24 170 90 90 33 33
Total (weighted) - 1,137 72% 62% 50% 43%
pNTM – a chronic disease?- Clinical studies
StudyFollow-up (months)
NRecurrence
N %
Huang ’99 <72 27 3/10 30Kobashi ’07 36-48 73 21/37 57Kobashi ’07 36 146 29/89 33Total (weighted) - 246 53/136 39%
pNTM – a chronic disease?- Recurrence
Treatment– Poorly tolerated– Suboptimal efficacy
Pulmonary MAC (NTM)- Chronicity
Treatment– Poorly tolerated– Suboptimal efficacy
Cause(s) not identified or reversible– Host defect– Exposure remains…
Pulmonary MAC (NTM)- Chronicity
Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007, 175:367-416 Canadian Tuberculosis Standards, 6th ed
www.ntminfo.org