Top Banner
Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: PROMOTING IRRIGATION PROGRESS AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
15

Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Cora Carter
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E.

Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural EngineerTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER:PROMOTING IRRIGATION

PROGRESS AND BEST

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Page 2: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Co-AuthorsDan Rogers, Kansas State UniversityThomas Marek, Texas AgriLife Research Freddie Lamm, Kansas State UniversityTerry Howell, USDA-ARS-CPRL Mahbub Alam, Kansas State University Norm Klocke, Kansas State University

SupportUSDA-ARS Ogallala Aquifer ProgramTexas Water Development Board

CREDITS

Page 3: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Efficient advanced irrigation technologies and BMPs are available as a result of combined efforts of research, extension, irrigation industry and end-users.

Appropriate application of technologies and strategies has proven - cost-effective- technically feasible - effective in increasing water use efficiency

However, adoption of irrigation BMPs, as well as proficiency and appropriateness of applications, have been highly variable.

Additional educational efforts are warranted to improve understanding and promote adoption and implementation.

USDA-ARS Ogallala Aquifer Program Technology Transfer efforts- increase public awareness of research - improve accessibility of information/educational resources - improve appropriate application of technologies and BMPs

PROMOTING IRRIGATION PROGRESS AND BMPS

Page 4: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Educational efforts promoting irrigation best management practices - increase adoption of practices

- increase public understanding of the importance of irrigation - increase visibility and impact of the Ogallala Aquifer Program

- promote affiliated research and extension programs

Build upon existing programs and collaborations - improve communication and maximize complementary expertise - accommodate additional audiences and applications - improve quality, effectiveness and efficiency of educational programs

Methods and media to reach an expanding and diverse audience

Evaluation tools to assess and improve programs and products

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OBJECTIVES

Page 5: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

AUDIENCESAgricultural producers, crop consultants, technical service providers, irrigation professionals and similarly interested professionals working with irrigated agriculture

- college educated and familiar crop production systems, irrigation technologies and irrigation water resources

- have access to a variety of information sources - increasingly technologically sophisticated; rapid adopters of

technology- primary decision makers/advisors regarding irrigation technology

selection and irrigation management

Agribusiness professionals, bankers, off-site landowners, research scientists, policy makers and others interested agriculture and/or water issues in general

- college educated and interested in the subject matter, yet less familiar with irrigation technologies, methods and

management- not generally involved in field level irrigation scheduling and

management, yet may influence irrigation decisions (technology selection, investments in equipment, etc.)

Page 6: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

AUDIENCESYouth and general public audiences are becoming increasingly important target audiences. Goals for these audiences:

- increasing water awareness and literacy- building support for water conservation programs- improving understanding of the economic significance of irrigated

agriculture (locally, regionally, globally)

Small scale landowners are a significant emerging audience. Generally speaking, many

- are highly educated professionals- lack experience in rural and agricultural settings- seek information related to agricultural irrigation (pastures,

vineyards, horticultural and specialty crops) on a smaller scale

- tend to prefer electronic, web-based information access- can be key supporters of water conservation programs

There are overlaps and exceptions, of course.

Page 7: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

Audience information needs and information delivery expectations continue to expand.

Traditional formats (on-farm demonstrations, workshops, conferences, classes, crop tours, and other “face to face” formats) continue to be important and effective for many, particularly for the traditional primary target audiences.

- Venue, relevance of subject matter and presentation quality are very important.

- Events derive much of their value as social networking and general information sharing opportunities.

Resources to support effective in-person program delivery likely will become more limited.

Evaluation instruments maximize relevance and improve effectiveness of these delivery formats and events.

Page 8: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

On-farm demonstrations are a traditional Extension technology transfer format wherein technologies and BMPs are “proven” locally effective and applicable in commercial farm settings. Examples:

- on-farm center pivot studies to verify and promote the KanSched and other irrigation management tools and strategies

- on-farm subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) system evaluations- center pivot uniformity evaluations- center pivot in-canopy nozzle package performance evaluations

(Kansas State University Irrigation Research & Extension Mobile Irrigation Lab)

Targeted meetings and workshops offer Continuing Education Units necessary for maintenance of licenses and certifications (i.e. pesticide applicator licensees, Certified Crop Advisers, IA Certified Agricultural Irrigation Specialists, etc.). They can be stand-alone events, or they may be held in conjunction with farm shows or larger conferences.

Page 9: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

Emerging audiences often prefer alternative technology transfer mechanisms, including Internet–based delivery that allows them to access information any time, anonymously and on-demand.

They often prefer concise “sound bite” answers over more comprehensive educational packages, and they expect higher level web-based packaging of resources (web-based video, iTunes Podcasts, online calculators).

Development of these packages requires additional web programming skills, hardware and software maintenance, and visual design expertise. Yet the overall delivery and potential to reach an expansive audience base makes electronic delivery very efficient.

Page 10: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

Decision support software and online technology transfer

KSU Mobile Irrigation Laboratory provides software and technical support information for farm-level tools:

KanSched2 - ET-based irrigation scheduling tool FuelCost - calculator to estimate seasonal irrigation costs

Crop Water Allocator - seasonal irrigation planning tool Compare Energy Costs – tool to compare fuels for irrigation pumping

Texas High Plains Evapotranspiration Network (exas AgriLife Research and Extension Centers at Lubbock (lubbock.tamu.edu/) and at Amarillo (amarillo.tamu.edu/index.php)

USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Laboratory Soil and Water Management Unit (www.cprl.ars.usda.gov/swmru_research.htm)

Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the Great Plains (www.ksre.ksu.edu/sdi/)

Irrigation at K-State Research and Extension (www.ksre.ksu.edu/irrigate/)

Page 11: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Seminars, meetings and hands-on training events - promote adoption of these decision support tools- provide opportunities to obtain user feedback for

ongoing program improvement and support

General public and youth audiences

KSU Mobile Irrigation Lab mobile exhibit - used at county fairs and youth water festivals- computer based interactive games and quizzes

Internet websites

Presentations at public meetings, fairs and festivals

Articles in newspapers and television and radio features

Increased public access to bulletins, fact sheets, videos and other educational resources

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

Page 12: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

RESULTS

Evaluation of effectiveness of educational programs - Agencies are required to document program outcomes- Feedback to improve program quality and relevance

Data from audience surveys and other evaluation instruments communicate value of programs to agency leaders and stakeholders.

- Detailed surveys (feedback on agendas, topics, venues, speakers)- Standardized terminology on evaluation instruments to facilitate evaluation of programming efforts on local, regional, and larger

scales- Internet site counters - Direct and informal feedback on resources and requests by end-users for additional utilities

Page 13: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

RESULTS

Page 14: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.

Summary

Technology transfer is essential to maximizing benefits of technologies and BMPs.

Traditional and emerging audiences require a variety of formats and venues, and over a range of technical levels.

Evaluation provides feedback for ongoing improvement to ensure relevance and quality of programs.

Increasing awareness of irrigation research and technology transfer resources ultimately improves irrigation management.

Page 15: Dana Porter, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center – Lubbock T ECHNOLOGY.