F MSSM W C Damián K. Mayorga Peña Based on arXiv: 1707.xxxx, in collaboration with Roberto Valandro StringPheno, Virginia Tech, July 4, 2017
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
F-theoretic MSSMs at Weak Coupling
Damián K. Mayorga Peña
Based on arXiv: 1707.xxxx, in collaboration with Roberto Valandro
StringPheno, Virginia Tech, July 4, 2017
Plan
• Introduction and motivation• The Sen limit of an MSSM-like model• A two U(1) model• (not so) Exotic Ma�er in the type IIB limit
• Conclusions and Prospects
2 of 14
Introduction and motivation
• F-theory exhibits a promising phenomenology, mostly explored in thecontext of SU(5) GUTs.
Antoniadis, Beasley, Braun, Colinucci,Dolan, Dudas, Grimm, Hayashi, Heckman, Keitel, Leontaris, Marchesano, Marsano,Mayrhofer, Palti, Schäfer Nameki, Vafa,Valandro, Watari, Weigand,. . .
• ...there are (in principle) other alternatives. Here we consider some of suchalternatives motivated from the study of toric hypersurface fibers...thebare MSSM and a U(1) extended MSSM,
Lin, Weigand’14’16; Grassi, Halverson, Shaneson, Taylor’14; Cvetič, Klevers, DM, Oehlmann, Piragua, Reuter’15; see Ling’s,Mirjam’s and Wati’s talks
• Do these constructions have a description as intersecting D7 orientifoldmodels in perturbative type IIB string theory?
Blumenhagen, Grimm, Jurke, Weigand’09; Krause, Mayrhofer, Weigand’12
3 of 14
Introduction and motivation
An MSSM-like modelCvetič, Klevers, DM, Oehlmann, Piragua, Reuter’15
The fiber is cut by the cubic
pF11 = s1e21e22e3e
44u
3 + s2e1e22e23e
24u
2v + s3e22e23uv
2
+ s5e21e2e34u
2w + s6e1e2e3e4uvw + s9e1vw2
as {pF11 = 0}.It can be mapped to the WSF by means of Nigell’s algorithm, with
f =148
[−s26 + . . .] , g =1864
[s66 + . . .] , ∆ =116
s23s39[. . .]
Hence we have an SU(3) at {s9 = 0} and an SU(2) at {s3 = 0}, as well as tworational sections with fiber coords:
S0 : [x : y : z] = [1 : 1 : 0] , S1 : [x : y : z] =
[s26 − 4s2s9
12:s3s5s92
: 1].
These sections provide the hypercharge U(1) generator.4 of 14
Introduction and motivation
at codimension two:
Representation Locus
(3, 2)1/6 V(I(1)) := {s3 = s9 = 0}(1, 2)−1/2 V(I(2)) := {s3 = s2s25 + s1(s1s9 − s5s6) = 0}(3, 1)−2/3 V(I(3)) := {s5 = s9 = 0}(3, 1)1/3 V(I(4)) := {s9 = s3s25 + s6(s1s6 − s2s5) = 0}(1, 1)1 V(I(5)) := {s1 = s5 = 0}
the chiralities are obtained a�er fixing the (vertical) G4-flux, which by recentmethods can be obtained in a base independent fashion.
Lin, Weigand’16
H (4,4)(X) ∼=Q[DA]4 ∧ [PF11 ]SRI + LIN
⊂ H (5,5)(X5) .
For this case, the flux expression reads
G4 = F ∧ σ(S1) + Λ(6[K−1
B ]2 + [K−1B ]S0 + S20 − 5[K−1
B ]S7 + S27 − 2[K−1
B ]S9 + S7S9)
5 of 14
The Sen limit of an MSSM
Sen’96; see Iñaki’s talk
Make the coord. change s = x − b2z2/3, with b2 =s264 − s2s9, such that the
section S1 touches the fiber at s = 0. The WSF reads
y2 = s3 + b2s2z2 + 2b4sz4 + b6z6 ,
with
b4 =s3s92
(− s5s6
2+ s1s9
), b6 =
s23s25s
29
4.
se�ing the scalings s1 → εs1, s5 → εs5, one gets b2 → b2, b4 → εb4, b6 → ε2b6.
• Gauge symmetry SU(3)× SU(2)× U(1) for any ε.
• For ε = 0 the fiber degenerates globally. Be�er study a resolved case
y2 = s3λ+ b2s2z2 + 2b4tsz4 + b6t2z6
with s 7→ sλ, y 7→ yλ and ε 7→ tλ.6 of 14
The Sen limit of an MSSM
• At λ = t = 0
X3 : ξ2 =s264− s2s9 ;
with ξ = y/sz.
• In the limit λ→ 0, the equation
WE : y2 = b2s2z2 + 2b4tsz4 + b6t2z6
defines a P1 fibration degenerating whenever:
∆E =s23s
39
4(s1s5s6 − s2s25 − s21s9
)= 0 .
• Non Abelian symmetry is preserved in the Sen limit. Remaining pieceresponsible for the U(1).
7 of 14
The Sen limit of an MSSM
• U(3):
X3 ∩ {s9 = 0} : (ξ − s6/2)(ξ + s6/2) = 0 .
We denote W = {s9 = 0} ∩ {ξ − s6/2 = 0} and its imageW = {s9 = 0} ∩ {ξ + s6/2 = 0}.
• SU(2): U = {s3 = 0} ∪ X3, does not split. Sp(2) ≡ SU(2).
• U(1): X3 ∩ {s1s5s6 − s2s25 − s21s9 = 0} splits in such a way that
V = 4DO7 − (W + 2W )− U , V = σ∗V ,
consistent with D7 tadpole cancellation
(V + V ) + 2U + 3(W + W ) = 8DO7 .
8 of 14
The Sen limit of an MSSM
The curve (3, 1)1/3 splits at leading order in ε
{s9 , ε2 s3s25 + εs6(s1s6 − s2s5)} ,
the split curves are (3, 1)(+1,−1) at{s9, (s1s6 − s2s5)} and (3, 1)(0,2) at {s9, s6}.
Hypercharge
QY =16
(3QV + QW ) ,
Representation
(3, 2)(0,1) WU
(3, 1)(−1,−1) WV
(3, 1)(1,−1) W V
(3, 1)(0,2) WW
(1, 2)(−1,0) UV
(1, 1)(2,0) VV
9 of 14
The Sen limit of an MSSM
Matching Fluxes Gauge fluxes are constrained by cancellation of D5tadpoles
0 = W−(3FW+ + FV+) + 3W+(FW− − FV−) + 2U (FU− − FV−)
• Pure even:
(FW+ , FV+) = (
2λ3DO7, 0) , (FW+ , F
V+) = (
16F ,−1
2F) ..
• Pure odd: FW− = FV− = FU− (can be reabsorbed in the B field).
• Mixed:
(FW+ , FW− ) = α(−1
3W+,
13W−) , (FW+ , F
U−) = β(−1
3U ,−1
2W−) .
The counterpart of the Λ flux reads
F = −6ΛDO7 + 2ΛW+ + 3ΛU , α− λ = 0 , β = 1 .10 of 14
A two U(1) model
Borchmann, Cvetič, Klevers, Mayrhofer, Palti, Piragua, Weigand
F-theory flux:
G4 =F1 ∧ σ(S1) + F2 ∧ σ(S1)
+ Λ(S20 + [K−1B ](−[K−1
B ] + S2) + S9(−S7 + S9))
Type IIB flux:(F+X , F
+Y , F
+Z ) = (F1 − F2, F1, F1 + F2),
F+X = λDO7 , (F+X , F−Y ) = α(Y+,−X−). F-th. U(1) charges: Q1 = 1
2 (QX +QY +QZ),Q2 = 1
2 (−QX + QZ) .
���1(2,0,0) 1(1,1,0) 1(1,−1,0) 1(1,0,1) 1(1,0,−1) 1(0,2,0) 1(0,1,1) 1(0,1,−1) 1(0,0,2)XX XY XY∗ XZ∗∗ XZ YY∗∗ YZ YZ∗ ZZ
11 of 14
A two U(1) model
Borchmann, Cvetič, Klevers, Mayrhofer, Palti, Piragua, Weigand
F-theory flux:
G4 =F1 ∧ σ(S1) + F2 ∧ σ(S1)
+ Λ(S20 + [K−1B ](−[K−1
B ] + S2) + S9(−S7 + S9))
flux matched byF1 = 0, F2 = Λ(−2DO7 + X+/2 + Y+/2),
λ = −2Λ, α = Λ/2.F-th. U(1) charges: Q1 = 1
2 (QX +QY +QZ),Q2 = 1
2 (−QX + QZ) .
���1(2,0,0) 1(1,1,0) 1(1,−1,0) 1(1,0,1) 1(1,0,−1) 1(0,2,0) 1(0,1,1) 1(0,1,−1) 1(0,0,2)XX XY XY∗ XZ∗∗ XZ YY∗∗ YZ YZ∗ ZZ
11 of 14
A two U(1) model
Adding an SU(3)× SU(2) top
Lin, Weigand’14’16
• A�er adding the top the model continuesto have a IIB limit.
X3 : ξ2 =s264− ws5s7 ;
instead of one, we get three conifold points.
• In addition to the fluxes along the σ(Si),there are five extra flux directions in theF-theory model.
• ...in process of matching with type IIBfluxes.
Q1 = 16 (QW + (QX + QY + QZ)),
Q2 = 13 (QW + (−QX + QZ)) .
12 of 14
(not so) exotic ma�er in the IIB limit
A singlet with U(1) charge q = 3
q = 2QX + QY
Representation q
���1(2,0)1(1,1) 31(1,−1) 11(0,2) 2
The absence of conifold points removes some ma�er representations, uponrealignment of the U(1) charges we find more exotic configurations. How doesthis extend to non-Abelian exotic ma�er?
Cvetič, Klevers, Morrison, Piragua, Raghuram, Taylor
13 of 14
Conclusions
• We have worked out the Sen limit of some MSSM models constructeddirectly in F-theory. Still the question of the limit depends on the base.
see Cody’s talk
• Generically, more flux directions in type IIB compared to F-theory.
• Some F-theory fluxes contain orientifold odd flux components.
• Generically, the demand for a smooth limit removes some ma�er from thespectrum, in which absence, charge redefinitions uncover more exoticcharged singlets.
14 of 14
Conclusions
• We have worked out the Sen limit of some MSSM models constructeddirectly in F-theory. Still the question of the limit depends on the base.
see Cody’s talk
• Generically, more flux directions in type IIB compared to F-theory.
• Some F-theory fluxes contain orientifold odd flux components.
• Generically, the demand for a smooth limit removes some ma�er from thespectrum, in which absence, charge redefinitions uncover more exoticcharged singlets.
you for your attention14 of 14
Related Documents
