Damage Threshold Data (Summary) Optical Damage Thresholds for Various Samples Sample Fluence DT (J/cm 2 ) DNA/CTMA on SLG Substrate 2.3 to 2.6 DNA/CTMA W/O Substrate 2.1 (sample curved) Fused Silica 2.7 to 4.5 (AFRL = 4.3) SiC Semi-conducting 0.6 SiC Conducting 0.65 PMMA 380 0.5 PMMA 455 0.6 Optical Damage Threshold Comparable to that of Fused Silica
15
Embed
Damage Threshold Data (Summary) Optical Damage Thresholds for Various Samples SampleFluence DT (J/cm 2 ) DNA/CTMA on SLG Substrate 2.3 to 2.6 DNA/CTMA.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Damage Threshold Data(Summary)
Optical Damage Thresholds for Various Samples
Sample Fluence DT (J/cm2)
DNA/CTMA on SLG Substrate 2.3 to 2.6
DNA/CTMA W/O Substrate 2.1 (sample curved)
Fused Silica 2.7 to 4.5 (AFRL = 4.3)
SiC Semi-conducting 0.6
SiC Conducting 0.65
PMMA 380 0.5
PMMA 455 0.6
Optical Damage Threshold Comparable to that of Fused Silica
Thermal Conductivity
[2]
DNA & DNA/CTMA [measured - AFRL]
PMMA [1]
• Large Thermal Conductivity• 0.12 W/mK for PMMA[1] • 0.82 W/mK DNA (~7X > PMMA)• 0.62 W/mK DNA-CTMA (~5X > PMMA)
Potential ForGetting Heat Out
[1] Takashi Kodama, et al., “Heat Conduction through a DNA-Gold Composite,” Nano Letters, 9, 2005 (2009)[2] Hartnett, Cho, Greene and Bar-Cohen, Advances In Heat Transfer, Volume 39, p. 174, Academic Press, 2006