Dallas 2015 TFQO: S. Velaphi COI #242 EVREVs: N. Singhal COI#213 H. Ersdal COI#76 Taskforce: Neonatal Maintaining Infant Temperature During Delivery Room Resuscitation Unique PICO ID# NRP 793
Dec 17, 2015
Dallas 2015
TFQO: S. Velaphi COI #242EVREVs: N. Singhal COI#213
H. Ersdal COI#76Taskforce: Neonatal
Maintaining Infant Temperature During Delivery Room Resuscitation
Unique PICO ID# NRP 793
Dallas 2015
COI Disclosure
EVREV 1 Velaphi COI#242 None
EVREV 2 Singhal COI#213None
EVREV 3 Ersdal COI#76None
Dallas 2015
2010 Treatment Recommendation
Topic not reviewed in 2010
Dallas 2015Search Strategy
("Hypothermia"[Mesh] OR hypothermi*[TIAB] OR "Body Temperature"[Mesh:NoExp] OR "Body Temperature Regulation"[Mesh:NoExp] OR Normothermia[TIAB]) AND (exothermic[TIAB] OR transwarmer[TIAB] OR heat*[TIAB] OR Warm*[TIAB] OR "Rewarming"[Mesh] OR “re-warm”[TIAB] OR "Incubators, Infant"[Mesh] OR Incubat*[TIAB] OR “radiant warmer”[TIAB] OR “radiant warmers”[TIAB] OR wrap*[TIAB] OR “isolation bag”[TIAB] OR “isolation bags”[TIAB]OR "Plastics"[Mesh] OR “skin to skin”[TIAB] OR “skin-to-skin”[TIAB] OR "Hyperthermia, Induced"[Mesh] OR "Hot Temperature/therapeutic use"[Mesh] OR "Kangaroo-Mother Care Method"[Mesh] OR “kangaroo-mother”[TIAB] OR “kangaroo mother”[TIAB] OR “kangaroo care”) AND ("Infant, Newborn"[Mesh] OR Infant*[TIAB] OR Neonat*[TIAB] OR Newborn*[TIAB] OR "Delivery Rooms"[Mesh] OR "Gestational Age"[Mesh] OR "Premature Birth"[Mesh] OR "Term Birth"[Mesh] OR "Live Birth"[Mesh] OR "Birthing Centers"[Mesh] OR "Neonatal Nursing"[Mesh] OR "Intensive Care, Neonatal"[Mesh] OR "Intensive Care Units, Neonatal"[Mesh] OR "Low Birth Weight"[TIAB] OR "Small for Gestational Age"[TIAB] OR prematur*[TIAB] OR preterm[TIAB])NOT (animals[Mesh] NOT humans[Mesh]) NOT ("letter"[Publication Type] OR "comment"[Publication Type] OR "editorial"[Publication Type] or Case Reports[Publication Type])
Dallas 2015
Inclusion/Exclusion & Articles FoundNumber retrieved 1517
Pubmed – 906; Embase – 609; Cochrane- 2
Inclusions CriteriaHuman newborns >30 weeks GA, English papers
Exclusion CriteriaNewborns <30 weeks GA, non-English papers, non-RCT
Number Finally Included in Evidence Profile tables
RCTs # 11Excluded # 1831
Dallas 2015C2015 PICO
Population: In low-resource settings, in newborn infants (>30 weeks gestation) during and/or post resuscitation/ stabilization Intervention: Drying and skin to skin contact or plastic bagComparison: Drying and no skin to skin or use of radiant warmer or isoletteOutcomes: change body temperature (8-important)
Dallas 2015
2015 Proposed Treatment Recommendation: Plastic
Bag
There is limited data during resuscitation/stabilization.In order to maintain body temperature or avoid hypothermia during transition (first 1-2 hours of life), we suggest that after a newborn infant >30 weeks gestation has been dried, he/she may be put in a plastic bag and swaddled (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) compared to open crib or cot. Values, preferences and costs for Plastic cover
In making this suggestion we considered the decrease in hypothermia with plastic. However clean plastic may not be available and costly and use of unclean plastic may lead to infections.
Dallas 20152015 Proposed
Treatment Recommendation: Skin to Skin
There is no data on skin to skin during resuscitation/ stabilization. During transition (1-2 hours after birth), we suggest to nurse newborns >30 weeks gestation with skin to skin contact or kangaroo mother care compared to cot/ open crib or incubator (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Values, preferences and costs for skin to skin contact
In making this suggestion we valued the prevention of hypothermia using a free and effective intervention.
Dallas 2015
Risk of Bias in studies: SSC
RCT bias assessment
Study Year Design Total Patients Population Industry
Funding
Allocation:
Generation
Allocation:
Concealment
Blinding: Participa
nts
Blinding: Assessor
s
Outcome:
Complete
Outcome:
SelectiveOther Bias
Bergman 2004 RCT 31Preterm vigorous,
CapeTown No Low Low High Low Low Low LowBytrova 2003 RCT 132 Term, Russia No Unclear Low High Unclear Low Low Low
Christensson 1992 RCT 50Term vigorous,
Sweden No Unclear High High Unclear Low Low LowChristensson 1996 RCT 30 Term, Sweden Unclear High High Unclear Low Low Low
Fardig 1980 RCT 51 Term vigorous, USA No Unclear Low High Unclear Low Low LowGabriel 2010 RCT 238 35-40w, Spain No High High High Unclear Low Low Low
Gouchon 2010 RCT 34 Term vigorous, Italy No Low Low High Unclear Low Low LowNimbalkar 2014 RCT 100 >1800, India No Low Low High Unclear Low Low Low
Dallas 2015
Risk of Bias in studies: Plastic Bags
RCT bias assessment
Study Year Design Total Patients Population Industry
Funding
Allocation:
Generation
Allocation:
Concealment
Blinding: Participa
nts
Blinding: Assessor
s
Outcome:
Complete
Outcome:
SelectiveOther Bias
Belsches 2013 RCT 271 Term vigorous, Zambia No Low Low High High Low Low LowLeadford 2013 RCT 104 Preterm, Zambia No Low Low High High Low Low LowRaman 1994 RCT 104 Term, Malaysia No High High High High Low Low Low
Dallas 2015Evidence profile table:
Skin to skin contact vs Cot or Open Crib and Swaddling with or without initial use of
warmerQuality assessment № of patients Effect
Quality Importance№ of studies
Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other
considerationsSkin to skin contact or
kangaroo care
Cot or open crib and Swaddling with or without
initial use of radiant warmer
Relative(95% CI)
Absolute(95% CI)
Maintenance of temperature or preventing hypothermia
7 randomised trials
serious 1 not serious serious 2 serious 3 none not estimable
not estimable ⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
Dallas 2015
Evidence profile table: Skin to skin contact vs Incubator or Isolette
Quality assessment № of patients Effect
Quality Importance№ of studies
Study design
Risk of bias
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Other considerati
ons
Skin to skin
contact or kangaroo
care
Incubator or Isolette
Relative(95% CI)
Absolute(95% CI)
Maintenance of body temperature or preventing hypothermia
2 randomised trials
very serious 1
not serious not serious serious 2 3 none not estimable not estimable ⨁◯◯
◯VERY LOW
Dallas 2015
Evidence profile tablePlastic Bag with or without drying and Swaddling vs Cot or Open Crib with or without initial use of radiant warmer
Quality assessment № of patients Effect
Quality Importance№ of
studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other
considerationsPlastic Bag with or without drying and
SwaddlingCot or open crib with or without radiant warmer
Relative(95% CI)
Absolute(95% CI)
Maintaining body temperature or avoiding hypothermia
3 randomised trials
serious 2 serious 1 not serious serious 1 3 none not estimable
not estimable ⨁◯◯◯
VERY LOW
Dallas 2015
Key data SSCFive RCTs:
SSC versus incubator, heated crib, standard care
SSC versus cot and standard care (wrapped, under warmer)
Dallas 2015Key data Plastic cover
Two RCTs Plastic Bag versus WHO standard care (wrapping, isolette, or warmer)
Dallas 2015
Consensus on Science statements: SSC vs Cot or Crib with or without initial use of radiant warmer
During transition (birth to 1-2 hours after birth), we have identified very low quality evidence (downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision) from 7 RCTs (Fardig 1980, 19; Christensson 1992, 488; Christensson 1996, 1354; Boytrova 2003, 320; Gouchon 2010, 78; Gabriel 2010, 1630; Nimbalkar 2014, 364) enrolling 600 newborns >30 weeks gestation showing reduction in a number of babies with hypothermia when nursed with SSC post-delivery (Fardig 1980, 19; Christensson 1996, 1354; Boytrova 2003, 320; Nimbalkar 2014, 364) or similar body temperatures (Christensson 1992, 488; Gouchon 2010, 78; Gabriel 2010, 1630) when compared to cot or crib and swaddling with or without initial use of radiant warmer
Dallas 2015
Consensus on Science statements: SSC vs Isolette
For the important outcome “normothermia or preventing hypothermia” during resuscitation we could not find any studies reporting on SSC. During transition (birth to 1-2 hours after delivery), we have identified very low quality evidence (downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision) from 2 RCTs (Bergman 2004, e779; Christensson 1996, 1354) enrolling 66 newborns >30 weeks gestation showing reduction in incidence of hypothermia by about 90% (Bergman 2004, e779) or a 50% reduction in drop in body temperature (Christensson 1996, 1354) with skin to skin contact compared to incubator isolette.
Dallas 2015
Consensus on Science statements: Plastic bags with or without skin drying and swaddling compared to cot or crib with or without initial use of radiant warmer
For the important outcome “normothermia or preventing hypothermia” during resuscitation, we could not find any studies reporting on plastic bagsDuring transition (from birth to 1-2 hours after delivery), we have identified very low quality evidence (downgraded for risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision) from 3 RCTs (Belsches 2013, e656; Leadford 2013, e128; Raman 1992, 117) enrolling 409 newborns >30 weeks gestation, showing either a reduction in incidence of hypothermia with plastic after drying (Belsches 2013, e656; Leadford 2013, e128), RR-0.77 (95% CI, 0.65-0.90) or no difference in temperature (Raman 1992, 117) with plastic with or without drying compared to cot bed or open crib and swaddling with or without initial use of radiant warmer
Dallas 20152015 Proposed
Treatment Recommendation: Skin to Skin
There is no data on skin to skin during resuscitation/ stabilization. In order to maintain normal body temperature or prevent hypothermia during transition (birth to 1-2 hours after birth), we suggest to nurse well newborns >30 weeks gestation with skin to skin contact or kangaroo mother care compared to cot/ open crib and swaddling or incubator (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Values, preferences and costs for skin to skin contact
In making this suggestion we valued the prevention of hypothermia using a free and effective intervention.
Dallas 2015
2015 Proposed Treatment Recommendation: Plastic
BagThere is not data during resuscitation/stabilization.In order to maintain body temperature or prevent hypothermia during transition (birth to 1-2 hours of life), we suggest that after a well newborn infant >30 weeks gestation has been dried, he/she may be put in a plastic bag and swaddled (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) compared to open crib or cot and swaddling. Values, preferences and costs for Plastic cover
In making this suggestion we considered the decrease in hypothermia with plastic. However clean plastic may not be available and costly and use of unclean plastic may lead to infections.
Dallas 2015
Knowledge Gaps
Plastic bags:Infants requiring resuscitationUsing a plastic with or without drying during resuscitationPlastic bag versus cover
SSC:Infants requiring resuscitationDuration of skin to skinCare of baby skin to skin and other methods of warming
Dallas 2015Next Steps
This slide will be completed during Task Force Discussion (not EvRev) and should include:
Consideration of interim statementPerson responsibleDue date