1 Early Call 8:45am EST: Corn up $.01, soybeans up $.03, wheat down $.01. The biggest loss in equities in weeks and a 3-week low in crude oil yesterday, spilled over into the grain markets yesterday and much of the overnight session. However, a turn around in Dow futures and the U.S. dollar index this morning also turned grain futures lightly mixed. Grains: Grain and soybean futures fell Thursday as disappointing U.S. export sales and projections for a bumper Brazilian harvest stoked concerns of a loosening U.S. grip on global demand. Projections released by private analytics firm Informa Economics showed Brazil's soybean crop rising to 108mmt for the 2016-17 crop year, up significantly from the year prior, analysts said. Informa raised estimates for the South American giant's corn crop to 91mmt from 66.5mmt last year. Lackluster U.S. export sales for the week ended Feb. 23, released by the USDA Thursday morning, exacerbated the strain. Net corn sales of 713,100mt came in below a survey of analyst estimates by The Wall Street Journal, which projected a minimum of 750,000mt. Wheat and soybean sales of 452,000mt and 427,700mt, respectively, hung in the lower range of estimates. Informa's estimates sparked brief selloffs in corn and soybeans before prices stabilized, though analysts said grain markets still had a premium to shed after two days of aggressive buying on the back of rumors about changes to federal biofuels regulation. Conflicting information about potential alterations to ethanol and biodiesel policy by President Donald Trump sparked frenzied buying and selling on Tuesday and Wednesday, before many traders put aside hopes that changes were forthcoming. Now that this rumor is being clarified a little more, we are taking premium out of the market. Most actively traded May wheat futures on the Chicago Board of Trade fell 0.9% to $4.52 3/4, while May corn futures sank 0.7%, to $3.79 1/2. May soybean futures dropped 1.4%, to $10.37 1/4. Showers are picking up in the drier parts of center-south Brazil, with dry spots reduced by next week. Showers will lessen a bit in the wet areas of center-west Brazil, which will aid soybean harvest, while adequate moisture will keep the recently planted Daily Grain / Hogs Marketing Outlook Written by: Jim Gerlach 3/3/2017
12
Embed
Daily Grain / Hogs Marketing Outlook Written by: Jim Gerlach … · 1929 and 2000". If Congress fails to deliver Trump's tax and regulatory agenda or screws up any other way, the
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Early Call 8:45am EST: Corn up $.01, soybeans up $.03, wheat down $.01. The
biggest loss in equities in weeks and a 3-week low in crude oil yesterday, spilled over
into the grain markets yesterday and much of the overnight session. However, a turn
around in Dow futures and the U.S. dollar index this morning also turned grain futures
lightly mixed.
Grains: Grain and soybean futures fell Thursday as disappointing U.S. export sales and
projections for a bumper Brazilian harvest stoked concerns of a loosening U.S. grip on
global demand. Projections released by private analytics firm Informa Economics
showed Brazil's soybean crop rising to 108mmt for the 2016-17 crop year, up
significantly from the year prior, analysts said. Informa raised estimates for the South
American giant's corn crop to 91mmt from 66.5mmt last year. Lackluster U.S. export
sales for the week ended Feb. 23, released by the USDA Thursday morning,
exacerbated the strain. Net corn sales of 713,100mt came in below a survey of analyst
estimates by The Wall Street Journal, which projected a minimum of 750,000mt. Wheat
and soybean sales of 452,000mt and 427,700mt, respectively, hung in the lower range of
estimates. Informa's estimates sparked brief selloffs in corn and soybeans before prices
stabilized, though analysts said grain markets still had a premium to shed after two days
of aggressive buying on the back of rumors about changes to federal biofuels regulation.
Conflicting information about potential alterations to ethanol and biodiesel policy by
President Donald Trump sparked frenzied buying and selling on Tuesday and
Wednesday, before many traders put aside hopes that changes were forthcoming. Now
that this rumor is being clarified a little more, we are taking premium out of the market.
Most actively traded May wheat futures on the Chicago Board of Trade fell 0.9% to
$4.52 3/4, while May corn futures sank 0.7%, to $3.79 1/2. May soybean futures
dropped 1.4%, to $10.37 1/4.
Showers are picking up in the drier parts of center-south Brazil, with dry spots reduced
by next week. Showers will lessen a bit in the wet areas of center-west Brazil, which
will aid soybean harvest, while adequate moisture will keep the recently planted
Daily Grain / Hogs Marketing Outlook Written by: Jim Gerlach
3/3/2017
2
safrinha crop in good shape. Northeastern Brazil will trend driest, but recent rains will
help to finish out the soybeans crop there, with stress focused on sugar and coffee.
Frequent rains in the southern ¼ of Brazil will slow harvest this month, but excess
moisture will be localized. In Argentina, rains were more than expected in central
Buenos Aires yesterday but will ease going forward. The northeastern ½ of the belt will
be wettest in the 6-15 day period. Rains will slow early harvest at times in mid-late
March, but any excess amounts look localized. In the U.S., Plains wheat rain will be
lacking the next 2 weeks, but Midwest wheat looks to improve with upcoming rains.
Wetter trends beginning next week though much of March will pose early corn seeding
delays for the Delta/southern Midwest.
The Buenos Aires Cereal Exchange left their 2017 Argentina corn/soybean crops
unchanged at 37mmt/54.8mmt, respectively. Russian farmers increased corn production
16% in a record harvest that confounded forecasters and may boost exports already
running at their fastest ever pace. The nation reaped 15.3mmt in the 2016-17 period
from October, the Federal Statistics Service said Friday. ProZerno and the Institute for
Agricultural Market Studies, or IKAR, had forecast 14.2mmt. Harvesting, typically
completed in December, extended into the start of 2017.
The trade is getting somewhat nervous over U.S. winter weather extremes, including the
California monsoon and extended Midwest warmth. The latest drought monitor shows
drought starting to re-intensify in the southern Corn Belt and the South. Dr. Elwynn
Taylor has us watching Arkansas during March to glean the moisture conditions that we
can expect in the WCB during panting season as he says those two things correlate. If it
is wet in Arkansas during March, we can expect it in the WCB in April. It appears that it
may be a little drier there this year, which may mean the WCB could be dry, which
wouldn’t be a problem given full soil moisture conditions, but it does mean the crop
may be more reliant on summer rain. There is also talk of a potential early development
of El Nino, which hurts production in southeast Asia, Australia and South Africa, but
normally helps the Midwest and South America. This month for the first time, El Niño
is the most favored scenario over neutral or La Niña conditions starting in July or
August, according to the International Research Institute and the U.S. Climate
Prediction Center. The probability for El Niño between August and October stands at
51%, while the chance of neutral is at 38%. But some models are calling for El Niño’s
arrival a bit earlier based on the progression of the sea surface temps in recent weeks. In
a special report by World Weather, Inc. this week, Drew Lerner noted, "A complete
absence of El Nino during the growing season would result in the most stressful summer
crop scenario, while the more El Nino intensity and involvement that El Nino has and
the earlier that it occurs, the less threatening the weather will be toward production."
3
However, the trade is predisposed to latch onto any bullish excuse to extend ag longs,
especially as the premium of equities vs. the CRB index widens.
Speaking of that, I hate to beat a dead horse, but it still amazes me the number of clients
I talk to who aren’t in tune to what is really driving the grain markets (and commodity
markets for that matter). I’ve spoken about “relative vs. absolute value” quite often of
late, but this piece from my friends at the Powerline Group (www.powerlinegroup.net)
does a good job of explaining the motivation behind capital movement into
commodities. In analyzing market action so far in 2017, an import point we must
concede is that regardless of how we slice/view the fundamental make-up of the
corn/bean/wheat markets at present (i.e. bearish lean), it rather obvious that the
spec/fund/outside capital element of the mix is looking to play from the long side! This
week’s RFS rumor/story is a good example, as even if a change were instituted via an
executive order from the White House, the subsequent congressional approvals, likely
lawsuits and court challenges, and EPA’s drafting of new regulations, etc. would take
months, if not years, to
implement (or said differently,
would probably not change
things all the much foreseeable
future). Not to be bothered by
such details, capital came
flowing in anyway. To a large
degree, this ‘appetite’ for
commodity exposure by
‘investment capital’ can be
explained from the attached
chart. A relentless charge higher in U.S. equity indexes to new record high after new
record high has largely been met by sideways-to-lower action in the commodity space.
This has resulted in a record spread between the equity and commodity index values, as
illustrated clearly on the chart. Throw in growing concerns/expectations for an uptick in
inflation and interest rates and a desire to diversity out of equities, and to large Wall
Street portfolio managers this effectively makes commodities look ’cheap’ or
’undervalued versus other financial assets.
Such types care little about balance sheets and export demand, they need a place to
park capital and they seek to move capital out of asset classes they feel are overvalued
(stocks, bonds), and into assets they feel are undervalued, or may provide a hedge
against inflation and we’re not talking about chump change, either. Our point here
revolves around the incredible amount of money that could come into play. Analysts
observe that investor inflows pushed multiple trillions of dollars into the bond market