-
Regional SWOT analysis from an economic,
innovation and RTD perspective
D2.2
Version: 1.1
Last Update: 16/1/2014
Dissemination Level: PU
Dissemination level
PU = Public,
RE = Restricted to a group of the specified Consortium,
PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including
Commission Services),
CO= Confidential, only for members of the Silicon Europe
Consortium (including the Commission Services)
The research leading to these results has received funding from
the European Community's
Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant
agreement n 320004
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 2 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Document Identity
Title: WP:
Regional SWOT analysis 2Analysis of research agendas
WP leader: Main Editor
Frank Bsenberg, Silicon Saxony Management GmbH Michael Kaiser,
Silicon Saxony Management GmbH
Version: 1.1 File name: D2 2_Regional_SWOT analysis_1.1 Last
Update: Thursday, January 16, 2014
Revision History
No. Version Edition Author(s) Date
1 0.9 Kessler, Motte, van der Zon, Payer, Janssens 06.11.2013
Comments:
2 0.9 Kaiser 07.01.2014 Comments: added value chain charts
3 1.0 Kaiser 10.01.2014 Comments: final edit
4 1.1 Kaiser, van der Zon, Margetts 16.01.2014 Comments: final
edit
5 Comments:
6 Comments:
7 Comments:
8 Comments:
9 Comments:
10 Comments:
11 Comments:
12 Comments:
13 Comments:
14 Comments:
15 Comments:
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 3 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Table of contents
1. Introduction
....................................................................................................................
9
2. Regional SWOT analysis of Saxony / Germany
............................................................10
2.1. Overview SWOT
....................................................................................................................
10
2.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
................................................................................
12
2.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
...................................................................
14
2.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
.....................................................................
16
2.5. Existing economic development policies
...............................................................................
16
2.6 Evaluation of European and international context
.................................................................
18
2.7 Technological view
................................................................................................................
18
3 Regional SWOT analysis of Rhne-Alpes / France
.......................................................20
3.1. Overview SWOT
....................................................................................................................
20
3.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
................................................................................
24
3.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
...................................................................
28
3.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
.....................................................................
30
3.5. Existing economic development policies
...............................................................................
31
3.6. Evaluation of European and international context
.................................................................
34
3.7. Technological view
................................................................................................................
35
4. Regional SWOT analysis of Flanders / Belgium
............................................................38
4.1. Overview SWOT
....................................................................................................................
38
4.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
................................................................................
39
4.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
...................................................................
40
4.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
.....................................................................
41
4.5. Existing economic development policies
...............................................................................
42
4.6. Evaluation of European and international context
.................................................................
42
4.7. Technological view
................................................................................................................
42
5. Regional SWOT analysis of South and East Netherlands
..............................................45
5.1. Overview SWOT
....................................................................................................................
45
5.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
................................................................................
47
5.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
...................................................................
48
5.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
.....................................................................
50
5.5. Existing economic development policies
...............................................................................
50
5.6. Evaluation of European and international context
.................................................................
51
5.7. Technological view
................................................................................................................
52
6. Regional SWOT analysis of Carinthia / Austria
..............................................................54
6.1. Overview SWOT
....................................................................................................................
54
6.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
................................................................................
56
6.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
...................................................................
57
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 4 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
6.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
.....................................................................
58
6.5. Existing economic development policies
...............................................................................
58
6.6. Evaluation of European and international context
.................................................................
59
6.7. Technological view
................................................................................................................
59
7. Conclusions
...................................................................................................................62
8. Glossary
........................................................................................................................64
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 5 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
List of abbreviations
BCS-NL Business Cluster Semiconductor Netherlands
BMBF Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
BMVIT Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology
(Austria)
BMWF Federal Ministry of Science and Research (Austria)
BMWFJ Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
(Austria)
BMWi Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
(Germany)
cfAED Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden
EDA Electronic Design Automation
ERDF European Regional Development Fund
ERA European Research Area
FDSOI fully-depleted silicon-on-insulator
GWT Society for Knowledge and Technology Transfer
HZDR Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf
ICT Information and Communication Technologies
IDM Integrated device manufacturer
JAP Joint Action Plan
KETs Key Enabling Technologies
LE Large enterprises
M(O)EMS Micro-Opto-Electro-Mechanical Systems
M2M Machine to Machine
MEMS Micro-electromechanical systems
MINT Mathematics, Engineering, Natural Sciences, Technical
MNE Micro- and Nanoelectronic
NFC Near Field Communication
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
RFID Radio-Frequency Identification
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 6 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
RIS3 Regional Innovation Strategy - Smart Specialisation
RTD Research and Technological Development
RTO Research and Technological Organization
SME Small and Medium Enterprises
SMWA Saxon State Ministry for Economic Affairs, Labour and
Transport
SMWK Saxon State Ministry for Science and Art (Saxony)
TSV Through Silicon Via
WFS Saxony Economic Development Corporation
WP Work Package
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 7 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
List of figures
Figure 1: Smart specialisation made in Saxony
.............................................................................
15
Figure 2: Value chain Silicon Saxony
..............................................................................................
19
Figure 3: Market focus Silicon Saxony
............................................................................................
19
Figure 4: Rhone-Alpes priorities and S3 Domains
........................................................................
29
Figure 5: Value chain Minalogic
.......................................................................................................
36
Figure 6: Market focus Minalogic
.....................................................................................................
37
Figure 7: Nanotechnologies for health as smart specialisation.
.................................................. 40
Figure 8: Value chain DSP Valley
....................................................................................................
43
Figure 9: Market focus DSP Valley
..................................................................................................
44
Figure 10: Smart Specialisation HTNL
............................................................................................
48
Figure 11: Value chain High Tech
NL..............................................................................................
53
Figure 12: Market focus High Tech NL
............................................................................................
53
Figure 13: Value chain ME2C
...........................................................................................................
61
Figure 14: Market focus ME2C
.........................................................................................................
61
Figure 15: Value chain Silicon Europe
............................................................................................
62
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 8 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
List of tables
Table 1: Overview SWOT Saxony (Germany) Strengths/Weaknesses
.............................. 10
Table 2: Overview SWOT Saxony (Germany) Opportunities/Threats
................................. 11
Table 3: Overview SWOT Rhne-Alpes (France) Strengths/Weaknesses
......................... 20
Table 4: Overview SWOT Rhne-Alpes (France) Opportunities/Threats
........................... 21
Table 5: Overview SWOT Flanders (Belgium)
............................................................................
38
Table 6: Overview SWOT South and East Netherlands
Strengths/Weaknesses .............. 45
Table 7: Overview SWOT South and East Netherlands
Opportunities/Threats ................. 46
Table 8: Overview SWOT Carinthia (Austria) Strengths/Weaknesses
................................ 54
Table 9: Overview SWOT Carinthia (Austria) Opportunities/Threats
.................................. 55
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 9 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
1. Introduction
Silicon Europe unites the technological expertise and resources
of Europes leading players in
micro- and nanoelectronics. They join forces to strengthen
Europes position as the worlds
leading centre for energy efficient electronics while
effectively working to counteract the
increasing energy demand.
The SWOT analysis has been developed to investigate, next to the
cartography (D2.1), in more
depth, the typical properties of the 5 clusters and to explore
the potential for each region for a
smart specialisation strategy. As such the SWOT analysis is a
useful tool to support the
positioning of Europe in its role as a world-leader in terms of
research, development and
production of the key enabling technology of micro- and
nanoelectronics with a vision of the
goals for Europe 2020. This analysis supports and further
extends the collaboration between
the high-potential European clusters towards a Joint Action Plan
in WP3 on local and regional
levels as well as on a European level to enable the
implementation of a smart specialisation
strategy for each region.
All the relevant data for the SWOT analysis has been collected
through an elaborated process,
through interviews and workshops, involving experts from
companies, cluster organisations,
research institutes, universities and public authorities.
Further assessment of the gathered
information was done in several project sessions with all
partners.
Based on this regional data, a structured European matrix will
be developed in D2.3 which
contains, in a condensed form, the most important elements of
the SWOT. This format then
allows a comparison of the data and an evaluation of the joint
strengths and the individual
complementarities needed to build a strong cluster
cooperation.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 10 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
2. Regional SWOT analysis of Saxony / Germany
2.1. Overview SWOT
Table 1: Overview SWOT Saxony (Germany) Strengths/Weaknesses
Strengths Weaknesses
Competence for high-volume chip
production by Infineon and
Globalfoundries,
most powerful micro-chip production in
Europe (every 2nd chip made in Europe is
from Saxony)
Silicon Saxony as core of the ICT cluster
(2,100 enterprises, 51,000 employees)
Strong research landscape (9 universities
with over 100,000 students - approx.
45,000 relevant for MNE -, 13 relevant
Fraunhofer institutes, HZDR, 3 relevant
institutes of the Leibniz Association, 3
relevant institutes of the Max Planck
Society
Working technology transfer structure
(Namlab, GWT, 20 Technology Centres
and Incubators, 5 cross-university start up
initiatives)
Dedicated education schemes on worker
level (dual study, professional schools)
Strong strategic cooperation between
Cluster and the regional authorities
Real triple helix managed high-tech region
Microelectronic as enabler identified in the
regional smart specialisation strategy
2.88% (1.6% public) of the Saxon domestic
product is used for R&D -> 5th in German
ranking
Silicon Saxony is recognized as strongest
microelectronic cluster in Europe
Competence for energy efficiency in Cool
Silicon Cluster ranked as the strongest
national leading edge cluster (BMBF)
Technology:
Vast experience in high volume production (More Moore and More
than Moore, 200mm and 300mm)
Strong industrial base for equipment makers, materials
3D-integration, smart systems-integration
Application competence for automotive, engineering, energy,
medical
Small-scale structures of Saxon economy
(many SMEs, no headquarters of large
companies in Saxony)
Systems and final-products approach
(weakness at the end of the value chain)
Lack of Venture Capital and Business
Angels
Lack of structured innovation management
within the companies
Decline in start-ups (start-up intensity with
61 per 10,000 working people is below the
German average 78)
Insufficient use of knowledge transfer
structures
Low proportion (approximately 15%) of
women in MINT-subjects (mathematics, IT,
natural sciences, engineering)
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 11 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Table 2: Overview SWOT Saxony (Germany)
Opportunities/Threats
Opportunities Threats
Cross cluster cooperation for enhancement
of innovation
Coordination of the research activities of
the European Clusters regarding the
market trends
better cooperation between the key players
in industry and RTOs in Europes
Microelectronics Clusters => indispensable
for future growth
Alignment of European, national and
regional strategies (European Strategy on
microelectronics, Innovation Strategy) and
respective measures
Strategy alignment with application
industries
Focus on consumer products/industries
(high potential of multiplication), create
new player for consumer products
More foundations of technological start-ups
than German average and above-average
potential for technology-oriented start-ups
from universities and research institutes
Growth of software segment 500
employees in Dresden, research institutes
for embedded software and systems
(cyber-physical systems), more systems
provider companies (e.g. server,
embedded products etc.)
Technology:
Continue with More Moore and More than
Moore with the goal of convergence as well
venturing Beyond-CMOS
Interdisciplinary cooperation with
biotechnology, organic electronics,
optoelectronics, mechanical engineering,
agriculture, health care
Microelectronic as enabler/driver for future
Mega Trends (Industry 4.0, smart mobility)
Many changes in cyber-physical systems
engineering (Smart City, Smart Logistics,
Smart Factory, Smart Car, Smart Grid,
Smart Systems, Smart Lighting, Cyber
Security)
Existing European regulation of
competition and investment
Supply and technology dependency on
Asian 450mm Foundries
Decrease of EU funding (structural funds)
Lack of national co-financing within ECSEL
Increasing energy costs through current
national energy policy (Energiewende)
Demographical change => decreasing
start-up activities and potential lack of
skilled staff
Challenge of successor establishment for
SMEs
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 12 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Strengths
Main strengths within the Silicon Saxony cluster are related to
the long experience on 300mm,
including pioneering and high volume production. A further
strength on the industrial side is
related to equipment manufacturers and suppliers in accordance
with D2.1.
On the research side, the high number of institutions including
a German excellence university
and a German leading edge cluster (Cool Silicon) are the main
assets.
Last, but not least, there are strong connections to the local
and regional authorities already,
reflecting the presence of a real and working triple helix
structure within the cluster.
In terms of potential further growth, the presence of numerous
start-up initiatives as well as
existing technology transfer structures are considered as
strengths within the cluster.
Weaknesses
On the other hand, the use of this existing structure in terms
of countable growing (new)
companies is a weakness. Also the structure of the cluster
itself, combining mainly SMEs
together with a lack of headquarters of big companies is
considered to be a weakness, leading
also to a lack of capital on cluster level. On the technical
side, the missing systems and final-
products approach forms a weakness at the end of the value
chain.
Opportunities
Main opportunities arise from increase of cooperation and
alignment of existing strategies on
various levels, in particular from better cooperation between
the key players in industry and
RTOs in Europes Microelectronics Clusters, an alignment of
European, national and regional
strategies (European Strategy on microelectronics, Innovation
Strategy) and respective
measures as well as strategy alignment with application
industries.
Threats
Biggest threats on local/regional level are the demographic
development in Germany, the lack
of national co-financing for important new funding programmes,
in particular ECSEL and
increasing energy costs through current national energy policy
(Energiewende).
2.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
One of the biggest assets of Saxony and in particular the
greater Dresden area is an
established strong cooperation between science, industry and
administration that has been
grown over the last 20 years.
Regional knowledge transfer is strong between SMEs and large
industries: experts work
closely together on topics like e.g. cleanroom technology, high
automation, robotics or wafer
inspection. The results are then being used within manufacturing
landscape of Silicon Saxony
and for new products which are mainly sold by the SMEs to
semiconductor industries
worldwide.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 13 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
There is a strong and excellent research landscape: From more
than 100,000 students, a share
of approximately 43% is engaged in the so called MINT- area
(Mathematics, Engineering,
Natural Sciences, Technical Sciences), i.e. in subjects that are
relevant to the semiconductor
field. Despite various initiatives1, the proportion of women in
MINT-subjects is still low with
approximately 15%.
Consequently, Saxony has the highest rate of researchers (1st in
Germany ranking): there are
31,44 researchers per 1,000 inhabitants.
The most important and relevant universities and research
organisations in the greater
Dresden area are:
TU Dresden, University of Excellence with excellence cluster
cfAED
Hochschule fr Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden (University of
Applied Science)
Technische Universitt Bergakademie Freiberg
3 institutes of the Max Planck Society
6 institutes of the Leibniz Association
1 institute of the Helmholtz Association
12 institutes of the Fraunhofer Society and other private
institutes
They are connected by DRESDEN concept a unique structure that
allows to combine the
strengths of the single players. DRESDEN concept is an acronym
and stands for Dresden
Research and Education Synergies for the Development of
Excellence and Novelty2.
The good connection to the industry is reflected by the fact
that numerous professorships are
being supported by industry. The following are relevant for the
field of micro- and
nanoelectronics:
Vodafone Chair Mobile Communication Systems (since 1999)
AREVA Endowed Chair of Imaging Techniques in Energy and
Process
Engineering (since 2009)
Endowed chair for ultra precision treatment with Iones and
Plasmes (since 2013)
Endowed chair for Organic Photovoltaics (since 2013)
Endowed professorship for cfAED (since 2013)
The education structure furthermore features dedicated schemes
on worker level (e.g. dual
study, professional schools).
The great scientific potential already leads to more foundations
of technological start-ups than
in German average 3 and above-average potential for
technology-oriented start-ups from
universities and research institutions. 4 cross-university
start-up initiatives (Dresden exists,
1 See e.g. http://www.komm-mach-mint.de 2 www.dresden-concept.de
3 Innovationsstrategie.sachsen.de, page 32
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 14 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
SAXEED, SMILE, Grnderakademie Lausitz) deliver technical support
while setting up a
business.
Regarding finance, there are so called Seed-Stipendien
(financial support for a team of max.
3 people setting up a business), the Technologiegrnderfonds
Sachsen (TGFS) as well as a
business plan competition futureSAX with prices and a dedicated
innovation prize (50,000
EUR)4.
Generally, there is a rather high level of publicly funded
research and development => 2.88%
(1.6% public) of the Saxon domestic product is being used for
R&D (5th in German ranking).
In terms of supportive infrastructure, the existence of numerous
business incubators and
technology centres to support technology transfer is worth
mentioning, e.g.:
BioInnovationsZentrum,
Nanocenter Dresden,
TechnologieZentrumDresden,
Business & Innovation Centre Leipzig,
Grnder- und Gewerbezentrum Lbtauer Strae,
Grnder- und Innovationszentrum Freiberg/Brand-Erbisdorf
GmbH,
Rossendorfer Technologiezentrum,
Technologie Centrum Chemnitz,
Technologie- und Grnderzentrum Bautzen,
Technologieorientiertes Grnder- und Dienstleistungszentrum
Annaberg,
TechnologiePark Mittweida
Technologie- und Grnderzentrum Freital
The so called Hightech Startbahn5 is still a quite young
initiative, currently run still as research
project that shall deliver support during the important growth
phase.
2.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
The State Ministry for Economic Affairs, Labour and Transport
(SMWA) initiated a study that
resulted in an Innovationsstrategie (innovation strategy) that
was published in July 20136.
The strategy consists of a detailed analysis of the present
situation and contains an action plan
for the Free State of Saxony (2014-2020) with regard to
innovation issues closely orientated
on the RIS 3 Guide7.
4 http://www.mittelstand.sachsen.de/4475.html
5 www.hightech-startbahn.de 6
http://www.innovationsstrategie.sachsen.de/ 7
http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/s3pguide
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 15 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Though the strategy was drafted and edited by the SMWA, it is
closely linked and harmonized
to other regional strategies and action plans by other relevant
regional authorities.
On the technical side, the Innovationsstrategie (innovation
strategy) basically defines
priorities for Saxony, namely all key enabling technologies
(KETs): Micro- and
Nanoelectronics, ICT, Nanotechnology, advanced materials,
advanced manufacturing
systems, biotechnology and photonics.
A specific growth potential is seen for micro- and
nanoelectronics with focus on 3D-integration,
smart systems integration, organic electronics and
photonics.
Identified future markets are: health, environment, energy, raw
materials, mobility, digital and
communication.
Figure 1: Smart specialisation made in Saxony
The existing and longstanding cooperation and the regular
meetings between all regional
decision-makers (local: City of Dresden, regional: SMWA, SMWK,
WFS) ensures an early
involvement of the cluster staff in the development of new
strategic guidelines (e.g. Saxon
innovation strategy). The excellent collaboration between
regional decision-makers and the
Silicon Saxony Cluster is also reflected by a direct
synchronization of action plans defined in
the Silicon Saxony Strategy since 2013.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 16 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
2.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
Regional instruments for cluster support
One of the most relevant cluster policy, connected also to
funding, is GRW-Frderung fr
Kooperationsnetzwerke und Clustermanagement (funding of
cooperation networks and
cluster management)8.
Die GRW-funding is limited to selected (German) regions. The
objective of the policy is to
sustainably strengthen the regional investments using a
self-for-self-help-approach finally
leading to the creation of permanently competitive employment in
the respective region.
Further (national) instruments for cluster support are the BMBF
Innovation Initiative
"Entrepreneurial Regions ("Zwanzig20) in which recently 10
projects have been selected,
each of them funded with approximately 50 Million EUR and 5 of
them led by Saxon institutions
(please see also section 2.5).
Last, but not least, there are nationally funded projects like
Cool Silicon9 (funded by the Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Leading-Edge-Cluster
Competition) and the Go
Cluster initiative by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs
and Energy (BMWi).
2.5. Existing economic development policies
The most relevant regional economic development policy is the
already mentioned
Saxon innovation strategy (see also 2.3).
It was set up following the requirement of establishing
priorities for EU-funding (2014-2020)
with a focus on smart specialisation. Micro- and nanoelectronics
as one of the key enabling
technologies has been identified as one of the most important
enablers of growth and
economic development in the region.
The overall objective is the creation of innovation-friendly
framework conditions as well as
strengthening the innovation processes through reorientation of
the general regional business
development programmes to promote business innovation.
Further aims are safeguarding of skilled manpower potential as
well as focussing of research
activities through increasing promotion of excellence and
concentrating on KETs.
The identified future markets are health and nutrition,
environment and resources, energy, raw
materials, mobility as well as digital communication.
8
http://www.foerderdatenbank.de/Foerder-DB/Navigation/Foerderrecherche/suche.html?get=views;document&doc=373
9 www.cool-silicon.de
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 17 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
The Innovationsstrategie (innovation strategy) is closely linked
and harmonized to the
Technology and innovation policy in the Free State of Saxony
(drafted by SMWK,
regional). The primary objective of this policy is strengthening
public and private research.
Further objectives are:
increasing the attractiveness of the Saxon region for
international scientists
strengthening technology oriented networks and clusters
supporting R&D activities of enterprises
intensification of transfer process science-economy
development of a research driven infrastructure
Technically, there is a certain focus on: biological and medical
technologies, chemical and
physical technologies, energy technologies, manufacturing
technologies, micro- and
nanotechnologies, software- and information technologies,
environmental technologies and
materials technologies. However, generally this policy is
considered to be technologically
neutral, i.e. there is no real focus on any type of technology,
sector or branch.
One of the respective funding instruments is called
FuE-Verbundprojektfrderung (funding of
R&D cooperation projects, from 2014 decrease of European
Regional Development Fund
(ERDF)). Another one is the Kooperationsfrderung im Rahmen der
Mittelstandsfrderung
(funding of cooperation for promoting SME, since 07/2013 only
for running projects).
Very recently, a new co-financing programme for the
MNE-initiatives of the EU with regional
funding share and focus on More than Moore was announced. It is
based on the definition of
priorities for 2014-2020 in the Saxon innovation strategy.
At the same time, the founding of Silicon Germany took place as
an initiative to connect MNE
with the user-industry.
The following paragraph lists the most relevant national
policies/funding programmes:
Central Innovation Programme SME (Zentrales
Innovationsprogramm
Mittelstand ZIM), BMWi
Entrepreneurial Regions (BMBF) - The BMBF Innovation Initiative
for the New
German federal states (Unternehmen Region)
Zwanzig20 Partnership for Innovation, since 2012: winning
projects led by
Saxon players and relevant for the field of micro- and
nanoelectronics are
smart (materials solutions growth), FAST fast actuators sensors
and
transceivers and Flex+.
Additionally, there is the Excellence cluster competition by
BMBF, in which the local initiative
Cool Silicon forms one of the frontrunner projects.
The overall policy document for all initiatives on national
level is the so called High-Tech
Strategy for Germany10 (BMBF).
10 http://www.hightech-strategie.de/
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 18 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
2.6 Evaluation of European and international context
Several years ago, Silicon Saxony started a cooperation with
Minalogic, named Dresden/
Grenoble Cluster Initiative, to strengthen the ties between the
two largest MNE clusters in
Europe. Based upon this cooperation the Silicon Europe Cluster
project has been initiated.
The idea was to enhance the cooperation with other active
European MNE clusters. For the
further development of the project it is planned to broaden the
scope by cooperating
internationally in order to remain competitive.
For the implementation of EU projects the TU Dresden plays a
clear leading role in terms of
numbers of projects and the involvement of cluster members. In
comparison to other European
countries it must be particularly mentioned that the national
co-financing within ENIAC was
considerably lower than elsewhere, hindering the implementation
of some potential interesting
projects.
For a further evaluation of EU funding programmes and also
opportunities on that see also
section 3.6.
2.7 Technological view
As shown in deliverable 2.1, the cluster covers basically the
whole value chain with a strong
focus on equipment. The identified strengths and focussed areas
with regard to technology
are:
300mm More Moore Fab, 300mm Power Devices Fab
Vast experience in high volume production on 300mm
More Moore (SOI Technology)
More than Moore (3D system integration, smart systems)
Strong industrial base for equipment and materials
Organic electronics (flexible and printed electronics)
Internet of things (cyber-physical systems)
Energy (storage technologies)
Biotechnology (in particular biosensors)
To link the technological view with the semiconductor value
chain the results from D2.1
overview on RTD offers and demands were combined with the SWOT
analysis data. The result
- a qualitative assessment for the whole ecosystem of Saxony
region - is shown in figure 2.
The size and colour of the bubbles indicate in which areas
Saxony has particularly high
competences compared to the other regions. These are the fields:
fabs, equipment and
materials (bigger bubbles with red colour).
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 19 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Figure 2: Value chain Silicon Saxony
The technological view has a strong interaction with the
identified future markets: health,
environment, energy, raw materials, mobility, digital and
communication as described inside
the regional smart specialisation strategies (chapter 2.3).
Several of those markets are served
already by the Silicon Saxony cluster, which has been explored
in D2.1 and is shown in figure
3.
Figure 3: Market focus Silicon Saxony
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 20 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
3 Regional SWOT analysis of Rhne-Alpes / France
3.1. Overview SWOT
Table 3: Overview SWOT Rhne-Alpes (France)
Strengths/Weaknesses
Strengths Weaknesses
R&D infrastructure & excellence: Leti,
ESC (synchrotron),
Nanocharacterization platform; 6500
jobs in research in microelectronics and
embedded software
Industrial leaders on semiconductor and
applications (e.g. ST+ Schneider)
Critical mass and concentration of jobs
in Rhne- Alpes (1/3 of French jobs of
the microelectronics sector)
Scientific & technology activities (high
number of patents/population)
Talents & Education quality & diversified
Innovative environment Grenoble is in
5th position in the Forbes ranking on
World's 15 Most Inventive Cities
(number of patents by inhabitants)
High start-up creation rate
Complete digital value chain
IRT platform 3D/photonics on silicon/
characterisation, part of Frances
stimulus package
EDA & Chip Design: strong community
Policies and tax incentives for R&D at
national and regional level.
Technology:
FDSOI for CMOS low power & MEMS
Imaging: analog design, materials for
photon conversion, packaging including
optics
Silicon Photonics
Design: multi-core architecture, mixed
signa, asynchronous circuit
Critical mass in software
3D integration
Improve market-based approach versus
techno pull
International visibility of ecosystem and
companies
Leverage of private investment for R&D
and for business development
Growth of SMEs
Attract more integrators
Attract more fabless companies
Not enough application platforms
In technological terms:
Not enough equipment manufacturers
No manufacturing of masks
No power electronics
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 21 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Table 4: Overview SWOT Rhne-Alpes (France)
Opportunities/Threats
Strengths
Minalogic operates within a favourable environment. Gold
Labelled for cluster management
excellence in 2012, the cluster is located in Grenoble, a city
ranked by Forbes in July 2013 as
the world's fifth most inventive city, and more broadly in the
Rhne-Alpes region, one of the
biggest French regions, highly dynamic in demographic, economic
and innovation terms. The
Rhne Alpes region's positive qualities were highlighted in the
recently published "Strategy for
smart specialisation": 2.8% of its GDP is invested in research
(only two other French regions
invest more); 2nd at the national level in terms of patents and
10th at the European level
according to the European Patent Office data.
Furthermore, Grenoble is renowned for the excellence of its
research sector which represents
6,500 jobs in microelectronics and embedded software. The
CEA-leti (1,500 people, around
250 patents per year, 2 or 3 start-ups created per year) and of
around 19 expert academic
laboratories linked to micro- and nanoelectronics up to embedded
software contribute heavily
to the patent production that put Grenoble at number five on the
Forbes list. Numerous
technological specialisations exist from low power electronics
to digital imaging, EDA and chip
Opportunities Threats
Smart specialisation
Interclustering at the national level
Interclustering at the European &
international level
R&D potential collaborations
Horizon 2020 funding and KETs
initiative (strategy micro-and
nanoelectronics)
National procurement for digital
economy
Use our start up pool
Demonstrators to be launched on a
regional level
Links with applications (integrators)
Technology:
Photonics
MEMS, Sensors & systems
Large-area electronics
LED lighting
IC integration in energy efficiency,
medical devices, transportation (control
and mobility), mobility in consumer
devices (e.g. FDSOI, Big data), digital
imaging, in traditional industry
(production and products)
Lack of investors in micro- and
nanotechnologies
Lack of interest for technical studies
Dependency on public support
Critical size to compete globally
Competition from Asia
Transport accessibility
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 22 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
design. They are connected to an excellent R&D
infrastructure and to numerous platforms (e.g.
IRT/ photonics on silicon/ characterisation/ 3D)
Minalogic and the Grenoble ecosystem also benefit from the
quality of the local universities
and therefore from qualified people who are, in the vast
majority, hired locally. The University
Joseph Fourier was ranked in the top 150 world universities in
the Shanghai Ranking 2012.
INP Grenoble ranked first in Material Sciences amongst the
French higher education
institutions ahead of ENS Paris, Ecole Polytechnique and INSA in
Lyon and placed 35th
worldwide in this subject area in the QS World University
Rankings. The institution is amongst
the 200 best universities worldwide in 3 out of 5 other subject
areas: Information Technology,
Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. It ranked
94th in engineering and
technology.
Grenoble also benefits from the presence of key international
players along the entire value
chain from materials (SOITEC) to the design of chips & the
manufacturing of chips and systems
(ST Microelectronics, E2V Semiconductors) to applications
(Schneider Electric), and from
highly innovative start-ups that operate in niche markets (e.g.
Isorg, Crocus Technology,
DeltaDrone) and contribute to the innovation dynamism of the
city.
The city also benefits from technology transfer, as described
below. Start-up creation is also
booming.
Minalogic gathers 225 members on its two strategic domains that
make it master the entire
digital value chain: micro- and nanotechnologies and software.
Amongst them, the micro- and
nanoelectronics members amount to 36,000 jobs in micro- and
nanoelectronics. They
represent a critical mass and a high concentration of jobs: 1/3
of the national jobs in the sector
are located in Rhne Alpes. Furthermore, a study carried out on
ST Microelectronics by
Reverdy in 2012, revealed that for every job in
microelectronics, at least two more are created
indirectly, either within the supply chain, or elsewhere in the
local economic environment.
Another strength of the cluster is that it contributes
tremendously to the long-standing and
fruitful local tradition of collaborative R&D between public
research organisations and
companies. It has certified 233 projects since its creation, for
a total R&D budget of 1,791
billion Euro, including 692 Million Euro of public funding
(local authorities, national government
and European structural funds).
The high level of research and development in the area
facilitates the creation of new
companies, using this new technology in business, this is key in
putting the research to the
test and in inciting new, creative and innovative uses for the
technology developed.
In technological terms, Grenoble, within the Rhne Alpes region,
is a key player as regards
low power electronics (FDSOI) and MEMS; in terms of imagers, and
has a critical mass in
software.
Weaknesses
A number of weaknesses or areas in need of improvement have
nevertheless been identified
at the cluster level. Firstly, Grenoble functions in a
techno-pull way. It is a clear focus of
Minalogics new strategy for 2013-2018, and of other local
partners, to work on improving the
market-based approach and to make sure that the result of
academic research is
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 23 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
commercialised but also that research better takes into account
the needs of the companies
in terms of market shares.
Another challenge that is faced locally is connected to the size
of SMEs. An important number
of Minalogics members are very small (less than 15 employees)
and face difficulty in reaching
the mid-size level. It is also part of our strategy to help them
grow.
A third challenge we face is related to attracting more
integrators and fabless companies to
Rhne-Alpes, these entities could benefit from Grenoble's
infrastructure while linking micro-
and nanotechnologies to applications.
Another weakness is that it is very difficult for local
microelectronics companies to find private
investors willing to invest in highly technology-intensive
companies. It is one of our priorities to
work on leveraging private investment for R&D and business
development in our sector.
Finally, one can also mention international visibility as one
current challenge which we are
currently working on.
Opportunities
A number of opportunities have been identified at cluster level
for the coming months and
years. First, it is certain that interclustering at the national
level with application clusters
and at the European level with partnerships such as Silicon
Europe will generate
opportunities for the cluster and for its members, in terms of
R&D collaboration, business,
networking and visibility.
One ambition of Silicon Europe is to generate project ideas
under Horizon 2020. It is also
anticipated that smart specialisation will generate new ideas
for the R&D infrastructure to push
forward together for financing under the structural funds at the
regional level. The Rhne Alpes
region did not perform well under FP7 and opportunities are
there to improve the number of
projects and SMEs benefiting from Horizon 2020 funding. It is
expected from DG Connect that
Silicon Europe partners will make sure the European strategy for
microelectronics is known at
the regional level and taken into account in the structural
funds.
Silicon Europe can and should provide input to the European
Commission in policy terms, the
partner clusters representing the voice of the SMEs. It is also
our common ambition to generate
new ideas and make sure they are integrated in the work
programmes of organisations such
as CATRENE or ECSEL.
Interclustering at the European level, and specifically Silicon
Europe, will allow for identifying
partners complementarities and make the most of best practices
to overcome the identified
weaknesses and threats, including in terms of international
visibility.
Microelectronics being a Key Enabling Technology, a strong
opportunity will exist to come up
with ideas for projects in line with Horizon 2020. One
opportunity will also be to inject
intelligence and microelectronics into traditional industry at
the regional, national and European
levels.
Finally, other identified opportunities relate to public
procurement as a means to enable
microelectronics to gain new markets and in pushing in favour of
demonstrators. A specific
working group has been organised at the regional level, uniting
stakeholders from the
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 24 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
microelectronics as well as from the energy and healthcare
sector in order to implement 3 local
full scale urban demonstrators in the field of energy
efficiency, mobility and transport, as well
as organising services and devices for care at home of elderly
or disabled persons.
In technological terms, the cluster has identified the following
topics as sources of
opportunities:
Photonics
MEMS, Sensors & systems
IC integration in energy efficiency, medical devices,
transportation (control and
mobility), mobility in consumer devices (e.g. FDSOI, Big data),
digital imaging, in
traditional industry (production and products)
Threats
Last but not least, our SWOT analysis for Grenoble, Rhne-Alpes
highlighted some threats
which are linked to the external environment. Amongst them,
besides transport accessibility,
one can cite the lack of private investment in microelectronics;
the dependency of some of the
cluster members on public support (investments in
microelectronics) and the fact that
Grenoble's economy is so concentrated on the semiconductors and
their use for
microelectronics that the closure or a change of location of
these companies would have a
detrimental effect on the local economy. This highlights the
importance of diversifying the use
of the semiconductors, by branching out to using them for ICT,
energy and biotechnology, for
example.
3.2. Analysis of regional knowledge transfer
The regional knowledge transfer system might be qualified as
fairly well organised, with
international recognition in the innovation process as a whole.
One very recent ranking by
Forbes, which took into account the ratio population/patents,
called patent intensity, ranked it
among the most effective worldwide. Interestingly enough,
Eindhoven ranked first in this
ranking, with Grenoble following as closely as N.5.
Link of university curriculum to the industry needs
As far as microelectronics are concerned, this topic is well
addressed in the Grenoble area,
both on a technical level, with Grenoble Institut National
Polytechnique, and Sciences
University Joseph Fourier offering technical curricula, as well
as on the innovation level, with
the management school Grenoble Ecole de Management addressing
the innovation process.
Several double curriculum Masters degrees are proposed,
combining management or political
science with engineering specialties.
All in all, 1,200 diplomas in microelectronics are awarded every
year through Grenoble INP
engineering school and University Joseph Fourier.
Grenoble INP is one of the top French engineering schools and
one of its schools, PHELMA,
is dedicated to micro- and nanotechnologies, and enrols close to
7,000 students in ICT
degrees. More than 450 students are enrolled each year in Phelma
or in the Nanotech
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 25 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
international school, delivering a common degree with
Politechnico Torino (Italy) and EPFL in
Switzerland, as well as in the Communication Systems Engineering
Master Degree designed
with the Polytechnico Torino.
Local companies are more and more active with regards to
adapting the curricula to the
industrys needs. Some are represented on the board of the UJF,
and Grenoble INP also has
a long standing tradition of close links with companies, which
take the form of partnerships but
also of teaching by companies.
International recruiting and focus
50% of Grenoble engineering students go abroad during their
studies
10% of students at Phelma are foreigners
20 different nationalities are studying in Grenoble (no more
details disponible)
General core curricula
Based on a sound scientific base, they guarantee a well
thought-out choice of the degree
course adapted to the professional context.
A diverse choice of specialisations
9 degree courses allow each student to find what best suits them
and to develop their
professional project among a wide selection of trades in
high-technology sectors.
Specific Fields addressed: applied physics, materials,
electrochemistry, processes,
Nanoscience, electronics and information processing, nuclear
engineering, component
physics, signal, image and sound processing, electronic design,
instrumentation and
transmission systems
Besides addressing the theoretical and practical topics involved
in microelectronics, the
educational organisations have a decidedly focused hands-on
approach with access to
industrial type platforms, such as those proposed in the CIME
Nanotech.
Set up on more than 2,800 m2, the Centre Interuniversitaire de
MicroElectronique et
Nanotechnologies (Interuniversity Centre of Microelectronics and
Nanotechnologies) is a
network including 8 platforms:
Clean room: 350 m2 dedicated to micro- and nanotechnologies
Electric characterisation
Nanoworld: for images at nanoscale
Design and testing of integrated circuits
Communicating objects: Systems On Chip
Microwave frequencies and guided optics
Biotechnologies
Micro-systems and sensors
The connection with industry is very strong, and maintained by
250 outside speakers from the
world of industry and research, including:
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 26 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
170 research lecturers to train the researchers who will meet
the challenges of
technological innovation.
11 partner labs
Partnership agreements with large companies and SMEs, which
offer many work
placements, final-year projects or jobs, take part in the
school's Partnership Day: an
annual event when students from the three years meet several
dozen companies
(stands, conferences, mock interviews, etc.), contribute to
teaching and
conferences on the different professions within engineering,
participates on the
school's various boards and committees (Companies assist the way
the school is
managed, enabling it to adapt its curriculum to developments in
the different
professions), help with equipment and setting up educational
platforms, prepare
student engineers for professional integration
A specific international programme in innovation management has
been devised in partnership
with Grenoble Business School: the MSc in Innovation, Strategy
and Entrepreneurship aims
at providing a framework and a toolkit for future managers and
entrepreneurs to identify,
assess and manage business opportunities in either their own
companies or in existing
organisations.
The programme reflects the realities of the global environment
and provides general
management courses together with highly-specialised modules in
the areas of Innovation,
Strategy and Entrepreneurship.
Knowledge transfer units
The region is very well known for its know-how in technology
transfer, and its ability to create
numerous start-ups out of these technologies.
Future organisation
- Organisation in progress: future organisation pending French
government
approval
A new comprehensive organisation, the SATT, including 13
partners, among them 8
stakeholders, with a programmed 57 Million Euro capital will be
created. Its main
objective will be oriented towards start up creation with an
objective for 400 companies
to be created over the next 10 years.
Current organisation
- Grenoble University: several tech transfer units depending on
the field of
expertise, with tech transfer and start up creation activities,
and most
specifically
Floralis for University Joseph Fourier
Guichet Unique de Valorisation for Grenoble INP with a
private
subsidiary INPG SA in charge of sales, marketing and
services
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 27 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Mutualised organisations for research tech transfer:
GRAVIT (Grenoble Alpes Valorisation et Innovation
Technologique)
for accompanying labs in their process of technological transfer
towards
industry (licensing, spin offs, partnerships etc.)
GRAIN - Grenoble Alpes Innovation et Incubation, for
start-up
incubation
PTALE - Ppinire Technologie Alpine d'Entreprises, for helping
newly
born start-ups in their development
CEA TECH
- Specific tech transfer offer deployed by CEA in France,
positioned between
levels 3 & 7 on the TRL (Technology Readiness Level)
scale
Activities common to the different organisations:
Research programmes
Licenses
Spin-offs, start-ups
Incubators
Science parks
Venture management
Seed money
VCs
Partnerships
Clustering
Industry lectureships at universities/research institutes
At the Minatec campus:
250 outside speakers from the world of industry and research at
PHELMA
ENGINEERING SCHOOL
Midis Minatec: every week an industrial, research or
institutional leader presents a
topic broadly related to the Minatec campus in 1/2h slot, with
free access to all
nearby stakeholders (students, researchers, companies,
institutions)
At University Joseph Fourier and the University campus:
The Keynotes international researchers invited to share their
vision, particularly
in computer science
Citizenship initiatives, organised partly by university Joseph
Fourier, offer as well
the opportunity to share scientific or technical matters with
local citizens, such as
Caf des sciences.
The annual national event Fte de la science in October, is also
a broad
opportunity for scientists from the local industrial or the
research labs to showcase
their most innovative products and solutions to the
population.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 28 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
3.3. Existing regional smart specialisation strategies
Diagnosis of the state of innovation:
To prepare the Regional Innovation Strategy, an extensive
diagnosis of the state of innovation
in Rhne-Alpes has been made. Some weaknesses have been
underlined, such as low
funding capacities and low performances on EU projects, pointing
to the necessity to fully
integrate the Europe 2020 priorities into the Regional
Innovation Strategy. However, the
diagnosis also highlights Rhne-Alpess strengths, such as its
diversified economic
environment, its many funding programmes to promote innovation
and its tradition of social
dialogue. These features account for its good level of
investment in research, the high number
of businesses created and the very strong performance on
collaborative R&D.
In particular, the role of Clusters and Competitiveness Clusters
has to be stressed as one of
Rhne-Alpes main attributes. Competitiveness Clusters are part of
Frances national
economic policy since 2005 while Clusters have been created by
Rhne-Alpess regional
authority as early as 2004 to foster regional economic
development. This policy has been
successful as some of the Competitiveness Clusters, such as Lyon
Biopole (specialising in
infectious diseases and vaccines), Minalogic (nanotechnology) or
Axelera (chemistry), have
since acquired an international dimension. Rhne-Alpess goal in
creating Clusters is to
connect all groups of players and to cover all factors in
business performance while organising
cross-fertilisation between different disciplinary fields. The
development of clusters allows the
region to focus on small and medium sized companies growth and
to enhance the economic
attractiveness of Rhne-Alpes
These elements are the basis for the regional strategy for
2011-2015, which seeks to foster
balanced regional economic development by promoting innovation,
international
attractiveness and territorial solidarity, entrepreneurship and
industries support and
development.
Objectives of the Regional Innovation Strategy & Smart
Specialisation (RIS3):
The Regional Innovation Strategy has three objectives.
The first is to improve efficiency of the regional innovation
environment. The region
will help technological innovation by enabling
cross-disciplinary approaches and
transfer of KETs (Key Enable Technologies), promoting
entrepreneurship and
innovation and supporting SMEs and mid-sized businesses' growth.
Finally, the
region will improve its support for European projects linked to
the Horizon 2020
Strategy.
The second objective is to discover and explore new innovation
areas and provide
solutions to societal challenges. This objective will be
achieved by promoting user
driven innovation and territorial experimentation to meet the
needs of the market
and giving a greater role to innovation in public procurement.
Social innovation,
which aims to develop social entrepreneurship and environmental
transition of
economy, will also play a major role.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 29 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
The third objective is to focus on smart specialisation topics:
7 domains, defined
by a combined analysis of societal challenges, KETs and markets,
that are most
likely to create growth: personalised healthcare for infectious
and chronic diseases;
an eco-efficient factory; smart grids and energy storage; smart
building with high
energy-efficiency; digital technologies and user-friendly
systems; mobility systems
of the future; sports, safety and infrastructures in the
Alps.
Figure 4: Rhone-Alpes priorities and S3 Domains
Especially 3 out of the 7 strategic domains are more linked to
Minalogic, as a co-leader:
Smart grids and energy storage, in collaboration with Tenerrdis
(cluster for
renewable energies)
Smart building with high energy-efficiency, in collaboration
with Tenerrdis (cluster
for renewable energies)
Digital technologies and user-friendly systems, in collaboration
with Imaginove
(cluster for imaging), connected in particular to health and
ageing issues
The fact that microelectronics is considered as an important KET
in the Rhone Alpes Smart
specialisation strategy certainly represents a strong
opportunity for the cluster.
The strategy highlights in particular the following points: the
new developments on this KET
are related to:
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 30 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
More Moore: continue the technological progress (next CMOS
generation) and
miniaturise below 20nm nodes
More than Moore: new functions such as Systems on a Chip (SoC),
System in
Package (SiP).
Rhne-Alpes ranks 4th at the European level with regards to
patents on this KET, behind
Bayern, Baden-Wrttemberg and the Ile de France region. The main
sources of patents locally
are CEA, STMicroelectronics, Soitec, CNRS, Alcatel and E2V
Semi-conducteur.
3.4. Existing regional cluster policies and initiatives
Since 2005, the cluster policy has been an overall strategy to
boost innovation and
entrepreneurship, by connecting all groups of players: research,
technology, higher education,
training and economic development to create partnerships and
networking. Other partners may
be brought in, such as public authorities, either local or
national, as well as firms providing
business services. The goal of competitiveness clusters is to
build on synergies and spur
innovative, collaborative projects in order to give partner
firms the chance to become first in
their fields, both in France and abroad. The clusters have the
responsibility to certify
collaborative projects emanating from research labs and industry
(SMEs and large groups)
which can then apply for public funding (national and local).
The main programme dedicated
to the funding of R&D collaborative projects between the
members of clusters (laboratories,
SMEs and large companies) is an interministerial fund called FUI
(Fonds unique
interministriel). The projects are co-funded by the state and up
to 40% by the local authorities.
In some cases the ERDF is also directed to this programme for
co-funding purposes.
Competiveness clusters are linked by a performance contract with
the state and local
authorities, defining their overall strategy and objectives.
They are evaluated on a 6 year-basis.
Minalogic was evaluated as an "excellent performer" in 2012, one
of the top 5 at the national
level, which is clearly a strength.
The cluster policy at local level is well-developed and clearly
represents another strength.
Indeed, national statistics of the DGCIS show that Minalogic
ranked first among all of the
regional clusters in terms of public funding from national
sources (FUI), local authorities and
European sources (mainly FEDER) received by the collaborative
projects it certified. (Source:
p27 smart specialisation strategy of Rhne-Alpes Region).
Furthermore, Rhne-Alps is renowned for its cluster policy, as it
is the first French region to
have created clusters in 2004. It currently invests over 15
million Euro per year in total in cluster
policies and collaborative projects (FUI). As a result, regional
projects at FUI calls for proposals
represented up to 50% of national projects. Even if there is no
policy exclusively dedicated to
micro- and nanoelectronics, overall the region invested over 90
million Euro in the sector from
2006 to 2012, which represents around 30% of its total
innovation spending (big projects,
cluster policy, technological platforms).
Micro- and nanoelectronics are considered by the European
Commission to be Key Enabling
Technologies for the development of goods and services. KETs are
regarded as crucial for
ensuring the future competitiveness of European industries in
the knowledge economy. The
aim of Minalogic is also to create a global business ecosystem
in the field of smart miniaturised
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 31 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
solutions based on leadership in research and innovation and on
the leading role of major
groups supporting the growth of SMEs.
Focusing on micro- and nanotechnology and software, Minalogic
has been one of the first
international scale clusters to develop expertise in three
strategic application markets central
to today's societal challenges: health (eHealth/MedTech); energy
and environment; and
connectivity and mobility, where microelectronics and software
have become essential in the
race for performance and energy efficiency.
Based on leadership in research and innovation, Minalogic has
become a potent pool of
technology, in which global companies can integrate innovative
technologies, developing new,
ground-breaking products and solutions. The major companies that
have already tapped into
this pool of technologies include e.g. Schneider Electric,
STMicroelectronics, HP, Orange or
Samsung.
As France's leading cluster in smart miniaturised solutions,
Minalogic aims to achieve
recognition as one of the world's top clusters in the field of
integrated circuits, miniaturised
devices, software and intelligent systems.
By 2018, as highlighted in its recently adopted 2013-2018
strategic roadmap, Minalogic's
ambition is to bring together all integrative industries around
smart solutions, in order to create
innovative and competitive products.
Minalogic has recently set up new initiatives that can already
be considered as best practices
and opportunities:
Easytech
A new programme was also recently created (called Easytech) with
the objective to support
industrial technology transfer. Its main beneficiaries will be
SMEs coming from traditional
industry. It will allow them to expand the range of products
they offer to include innovative
technological bricks and accelerate their development. Again
Minalogic assists SMEs in
designing successful projects and get public subsidies. A
committee offers strategic coaching
during the process and accredits the best projects.
Support to demonstrators
A specific working group has been organised at the regional
level, uniting stakeholders from
the microelectronics as well as from the energy and healthcare
sector in order to implement 3
local full scale urban demonstrators in the field of energy
efficiency, mobility and transport, as
well as organising services and devices for care at home of
elderly or disabled persons.
Minalogic is a key actor of this initiative.
3.5. Existing economic development policies
In France the framework for the promotion of innovation is based
on a transversal approach
between different ministries such as the Ministry for Economy
and Finance, the Ministry for
Industry and the Ministry for Higher Education and Research.
Different instruments and
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 32 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
structures exist at the national level. Local and regional
authorities mainly leverage national
policies, but are also often at the forefront for introducing
new policies and placing them as top
priorities for innovation.
Rhne-Alpes is among the best performing French regions in terms
of innovation and
economic development. Some statistics previously mentioned
confirm this: 2.8% of its GDP is
invested in research (ranked 3rd in France); 2nd at the national
level in terms of patents, and
10th at the European level according to European patent Office
data. It is also good in terms
of economic development (see separate question) and the
unemployment rate is lower than
the French average.
Its recently adopted regional innovation and smart
specialisation strategy will represent an
opportunity for the cluster, as the region intends to deploy
over the period 2014-2020 an action
plan structured in four parts for which instruments and funding
will be made available:
Technological innovation, technology transfer and KETs
Support for innovative start up creation
Growth of very small companies, SMEs and medium size
companies
Focus on Horizon 2020 and support for European projects
definition
The City of Grenoble, along with other local authorities,
including the Mtro, strives to support
the synergy between business, research institutes and
universities which is the key to the city's
economic development.
Grenoble's Presqu'ile district, currently covering 250 hectares,
with 300 housing units and
where 3,000 students study and 15,000 people work, is being
transformed to house a world-
class innovation campus - GIANT, 25,000 employees, 10,000
students and 1,800 housing
units.
Grenoble is home to several large international companies, such
as HP, Caterpillar and
STMicroelectronics, drawn to Grenoble because of its impressive
infrastructure and reputation
for innovation. Over 500 of the companies based in Grenoble are
foreign-owned.
The City of Grenoble directly supports clusters, such as
Minalogic, companies, particularly
start-ups and SMEs, and research and development projects, via
the clusters.
The City's support is both financial and practical, in terms of
providing the necessary
infrastructure, for example office space. The City currently
provides a space of 12,000m2
(CEMOI) for the use of start-up companies such as Delta Drone,
BH Technologies and H2AD.
Grenoble also supports the incubators, GRAIN and PETALE, which
exist to help start-ups get
off the ground by providing practical training, legal advice and
opportunities to create
partnerships. The City is implicated in national programmes
supporting projects such as Plan
Campus and CPER.
Furthermore, Grenoble's actions in terms of economic development
are carried out in respect
of the European Union's goals for Europe 2020, focusing on
cutting unemployment rates and,
notably, with the upmost respect for the environment.
The development projects in Grenoble make use of the wealth of
scientific knowledge present
in the City, engaging researchers, scientists and students to
collaborate in creating new
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 33 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
innovative ways to save energy and to reduce pollution. The
Presqu'ile project is designed to
render the area carbon neutral.
Finally many current major initiatives demonstrate the high
economic development potential at
local level:
Nano 2017
In July, Jean-Marc Ayrault, Frances Prime Minister announced the
states commitment of 600
Euro million - to which 100 Euro million should be added by
local communities - in the
Nano2017 project.
This 3.5 Euro billion research and industrial development
program involves primarily
STMicroelectronics, CEA-Leti and their local partners, and aims
to achieve, by 2017, a new
technological breakthrough in the control and dissemination of
nanoelectronics applications.
As ubiquitous and widely enabling key technologies,
nanoelectronics are at the heart of all
major societal challenges and the subject of intense competition
between the five major global
micro- and nano high tech ecosystems including
Crolles-Grenoble.
Today, STMicroelectronics and CEA-Lti have unique skills in the
world in FDSOI production
technologies, which is a key advantage for the most advanced
digital and mobile applications.
Nano2017 should leverage Grenoble-Iseres leadership in this
strategic technology sector, an
investment in line with European Unions 10/100/20
initiative.11
GIANT
In Grenoble, at the heart of the French Alps, the GIANT
partnership is forging dynamic new
links between research and industry to foster the technological
breakthroughs of the future. It
will gather 30,000 Men and Women with unique talents and
first-class facilities, joining forces
to build a world-class campus. The aim of the GIANT project is
to respond to major challenges
confronting our society today, such as:
Communication technologies
Renewenable energies and environmental problems
Bioscience and healthcare
GIANT hosts highly innovative institutions under a single
banner:
From the academic world - Grenoble Ecole de Management (Grenoble
EM),
Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP) and the
University Joseph Fourier
(UJF)
Major French research institutions - CEA and CNRS
11 In reference to the European Union programmes goals of
generating 10 Billion Euros public/private
funding for R&D, 100 Billion Euros investment for
manufacturing, and 20% share of global chip
production market by 2020.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 34 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Leading European laboratories - the ESRF light source, the ILL
neutron source and
the EMBL for molecular biology
A funding of 1.3 billion Euro will be invested between 2010 and
2015, including 700 million
Euro on scientific research and 600 Euro million on transport,
accommodation and quality of
life; 4.1 billion Euro are expected in terms of direct and
indirect annual economic impact.
3.6. Evaluation of European and international context
The European Commission launched in May 2013 a campaign for
coordinated public
investments in micro- and nanoelectronics (such as
semiconductors and computer chips),
designed to expand Europe's advanced manufacturing base. The
European electronics sector
underpins Europe's wider industrial competitiveness because it
is a Key Enabling Technology
for other sectors, from energy to automotive to health. A
growing electronics sector is essential
for growth and jobs in Europe.
Key elements of this industrial strategy include
1. Higher and more coordinated investments in R&D&I -
maximising the impact of EU and
Member State investments through greater cross-border
collaboration (70% of public
investment is expected to come from Member States, 30% from
EU).
2. Reinforcing Europe's three world-class electronics clusters:
Dresden (DE), Eindhoven
(NL) /Leuven (BE), and Grenoble (FR) and connecting with other
leading edge
European clusters such as in Cambridge (UK), Carinthia (AT),
Dublin (IRL) and Milan
(IT).
3. The strategy will focus on three complementary lines: making
chips cheaper
(transitioning to 450mm-sized silicon wafers, the raw material
for the chips), making
chips faster ("More Moore") and making chips smarter ("More than
Moore").
4. Mobilising 10 billion Euro of private, regional, national and
EU funds, behind a common
set of research and innovation goals, including 5 billion Euro
through a joint Public-
Private Partnership. This seven-year partnership is designed to
cover the whole value
and innovation chain in the electronics sector, including
funding large-scale innovation
projects, under the EU's Horizon 2020 research programme.
Neelie Kroes aims at doubling the EU chip production to around
20% of global production.
All these elements represent strong opportunities for Silicon
Europe partners.
Horizon 2020 and the forthcoming FEDER programming will also
create opportunities for
Silicon Europe partners to come up with new R&D project
proposals and to bring them closer
to the market.
At this stage the European market is still too fragmented,
without any level-playing field, and
SMEs are not enough well represented in Horizon 2020 projects,
two dimensions that the
clusters will be vigilant about.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 35 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Outside of Europe, the growing competition from Asia and the US
in terms of chips production
represent both an opportunity for partnerships and a threat.
3.7. Technological view
Amongst the key strengths of the ecosystem (both research
organisations and companies) in
technological terms, we can highlight the following ones:
A strong weight in full time equivalent of our 5 IDMs - and
mainly of
STMicroelectronics, one of the top 10 at world level -, which
position the ecosystem
as excellent in terms of component manufacturing
A strength in design (which is also masterised by our IDMs by
definition): multi-core
architecture, mixed signal , asynchronous circuit
The importance of the companies active in systems , both in
terms of number of
companies and full time equivalent. There it is worth noting the
ecosystems
expertise in application software and embedded software.
It is also important to note that our internal analysis
demonstrated why Grenoble
valley is recognized as the imaging valley for the design and
component
manufacturing in digital imaging (CMOS components and sensors,
system
integration in modules, analog design, materials for photon
conversion, packaging
including optics) with the presence of world best companies
(e.g. Trixell, Ulis,
Sofradir, E2V, STmicroelectronics, Pyxalis or Isorg) and a
generated cumulated
revenue of 1 billion Euro.
Fully Depleted Silicon On Insulator, or FD-SOI. FD-SOI is a
planar process
technology introducted by ST, CEA, Soitec and partners that
delivers the benefits
of reduced silicon geometries while enabling a simplification of
the manufacturing
process (CMOS low power)
3D integration and TSV, a critical issue as device designers and
manufacturers
increasingly cross into the third dimension due to the industrys
continuing pursuit
of building more functionality into ever-shrinking silicon real
estate.
MEMS historical competence with IDMs Tronics, leti, ST
Silicon Photonics very active with ST
Identified sources of opportunities are linked to the following
emerging technologies:
LED lighting with SMEs such as Aledia which develops and
manufactures
innovative light-emitting diodes (LEDs) based on a unique 3D
architecture using
gallium-nitride (GaN)-on-silicon microwires
Large area electronics with companies such as ISORG which is a
pioneering
company in Organic and Printed Electronics devices for
large-area photonics and
image sensors with a technology revolutionizing the
industry.
Sensors for health and biology
Link between hard and soft (the other strategic activity domain
of Minalogic)
Finally a strong opportunity for the cluster and is to maintain
and develop a strong
link with applications (e.g. automotive, health) including
through interclustering at
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 36 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
national and international levels to understand their
technological needs and the
constraints linked to their markets
Identified weaknesses are related to the following
technologies:
There are very few equipment manufacturers in the ecosystem
members of
Minalogic
Power electronics is not developed
No manufacturing of masks
Finally some threats could be linked to the following
aspects:
Stronger competition from Asia and the US
Develop the links between technology and applications (e.g.
attract new integrators)
Maintain the capacity to invest in manufacturing and
production
To link the technological view with the semiconductor value
chain the results from D2.1
overview on RTD offers and demands were combined with the SWOT
analysis data. The result
- a qualitative assessment for the whole ecosystem of Rhone
Alpes region - is shown in figure
5. The size and colour of the bubbles indicates in which areas
Rhone Alpes region has
particular high competences compared to the other regions. These
are the fields: design, fabs
and systems (bigger bubbles with red colour).
Figure 5: Value chain Minalogic
The technological view has a strong interaction with the
identified future markets: smart grids
and energy storage, smart building, digital technologies and
user-friendly systems, health and
ageing issues as described inside the regional smart
specialisation strategies (chapter 3.3).
Several of those markets will be served already by the Grenoble
cluster, which has been
explored in D2.1 and is shown in figure 6.
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 37 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
Figure 6: Market focus Minalogic
-
D2.2
Silicon Europe Page 38 of 65 FP7 RoK GA 320004
4. Regional SWOT analysis of Flanders / Belgium
4.1. Overview SWOT
Table 5: Overview SWOT Flanders (Belgium)
Strengths Weaknesses
World leader in broad interdisciplinary
research for micro- and nanoelectronics.
Accounts for 48% of employment
RTD platform for 300mm available and
450mm ready
Wide value chain from basic R&D to
system integration, covering a large
range of activities in micro- and
nanoelectronics
Innovation ecosystem build around imec
and KULeuven
World-level education and training offer
High potential in design with highly
skilled professionals
Most niche markets covered, but only
niche markets
Low-threshold access services to
advanced technologies
Smallest region but with important
cross-border activities
Wide valley-of-death between research
and industrial activities
Weak link between inte