Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome is characterized by altered functional brain connectivity of the insular cortex: a crosscomparison with migraine and healthy adultsReceived:29July2016 | Accepted:7November2016 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13004
H O T T O P I C
Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome is characterized by altered functional brain connectivity of the insular cortex: a cross- comparison with migraine and healthy adults
D.-M. Ellingsen1, 2 | R. G. Garcia1, 3, 4 | J. Lee1 | R. L. Lin1 | J. Kim1, 5 | A. H. Thurler6 | S. Castel6 | L. Dimisko6 | B. R. Rosen1 | N. Hadjikhani1 | B. Kuo6 * | V. Napadow1 *
*Contributedequallytothiswork.
1MartinosCenterforBiomedical Imaging,Departmentof Radiology,MassachusettsGeneral Hospital,HarvardMedicalSchool,Boston, MA,USA 2DepartmentofPsychology,Universityof Oslo,Oslo,Norway 3NeuroscienceGroup,Schoolof Medicine,UniversidaddeSantander(UDES), Bucaramanga,Colombia 4ConnorsCenterforWomen’sHealthand GenderBiology,BrighamandWomen’s Hospital,HarvardMedicalSchool,Boston, MA,USA 5KoreanInstituteforOrientalMedicine, Daejeon, Korea 6DepartmentofGastroenterology, MassachusettsGeneralHospital,Harvard MedicalSchool,Boston,MA,USA
Correspondence Dan-MikaelEllingsen MartinosCenterforBiomedicalImaging Charlestown,MA,USA. Email:
[email protected]Funding information NationalInstitutesofHealth,Grant/Award Number:P01-AT006663,R01-AT007550, R01-AR064367,K23-DK069614and R21-AR057920;NationalCenterfor ResearchResources,Grant/AwardNumber: P41RR14075andCRC1UL1RR025758; NorwegianResearchCouncil/Marie Sklodowska-CurieActions,Grant/Award Number:FRICON/COFUND-240553/F20; MartinosComputing,Grant/AwardNumber: S10RR023401,S10RR019307,S10RR019254 andS10RR023043;InternationalFoundation ofFunctionalGastrointestinalDisorders.
Abstract Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS) has been linked to episodicmigraine, yet little is knownabout theprecisebrain-basedmechanismsunderpinningCVS, andwhether theseassociatedconditionssharesimilarpathophysiology.Weinvestigatedthefunc- tional integrityofsalience (SLN)andsensorimotor (SMN) intrinsicconnectivitynet- worksinCVS,migraineandhealthycontrolsusingbrainfunctionalMagneticResonance Imaging.CVS,relativetobothmigraineandcontrols,showedincreasedSLNconnec- tivitytomiddle/posteriorinsula,akeybrainregionfornauseaandviscerosensorypro- cessing. Incontrast, thissameregionshoweddiminishedSMNconnectivity inboth CVSandmigraine.Theseresultshighlightbothuniqueandpotentiallysharedpatho- physiologybetweentheseconditions,andsuggestapotentialtargetfortherapeutics infuturestudies.
K E Y W O R D S
brainimaging,CyclicVomitingSyndrome,functionalMagneticResonance,imaging,migraine
1 | INTRODUCTION
CyclicVomitingSyndrome(CVS)hasbeencomparedtoepisodicmi- grainebecauseofsimilarityintheirdynamicprogressionofsymptoms during ictal eventsor “attacks”.1Whilemigraine is characterizedby neuropathic/visceralsymptoms,2CVSsymptomsaremorepurelyvis- ceral and localized to the gut.Ultimately, little is known about the brainmechanismsunderpinningCVSorwhetherthesetwoanecdo- tallylinkeddisordersactuallyshareanysimilarityinpathophysiology.3
CVSisanepisodicdisordercharacterizedbyrecurrentepisodesof nauseaandvomitingwithinterictalsymptom-freeperiods.4Whilesev- eraltheorieshavelinkedthedisordertopredisposingfactorssuchas migraine,psychologicalorinfectiousstress,gastricdysrhythmias,food allergies,andmitochondrialdysfunction,5aberrantneuralphysiology forvisceroceptivebraincircuitrymaysupportacommonpathophys- iologicalpathwayforallthesefactors.Ourpreviousresearch,6using functionalMagneticResonanceImaging(fMRI)haslinkedtheanterior andmiddleinsulacortexwithnauseaperception.Infact,themiddle and/orposterior insula,7whichhasbeen referred to as theprimary viscerosensory cortex,8maybe a key region forviscerosensory and nausea-associated autonomic9 processing in CVS. Functional brain connectivity, a tool that has revealeddisruptions invarious chronic gastroenterological, neurological, and psychiatric disorders,10, 11 has highlightedaltered intrinsic informationflowatthenetwork level in migraine,12andcross-comparisontoCVSpatientsmayhelpdifferen- tiatethesetwolinkeddisordersintermsofneuralpathophysiology.
Theaimofourstudywastoinvestigatethefunctionalintegrityof twobrainnetworks thatencompass insula cortex, i.e. Sensorimotor (SMN)andSalience(SLN)Networks, inCVS.Whileprimary(S1)and secondary(S2)somatosensoryregionsincludedintheSMNplayakey role inbottom-upsomatosensoryprocessing, theSLN is thought to appraisetherelativeimportance(i.e.salience)ofinternalandsensory stimuli,13bothvisceralandsomatic.Moreover,bothofthesenetworks arecentraltopainprocessinginthebrain.14Forinstance,aprevious studyfoundthatevokeddeep-tissuesomaticpain involvedreduced functionalconnectivityofthesomatotopy-targetedS1areatoSMN, butincreasedconnectivitytoSLN.15Wehypothesizedthat(i)CVSis characterizedbyalteredconnectivitybetweenthesebrainnetworks andviscerosensoryprocessingbrainareas,and(ii)similaritiesanddif- ferencesinbrainconnectivitybetweenCVSandmigrainepatientswill highlightboththesharedanduniquepathophysiologyunderlyingCVS.
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
We enrolled 13 patients diagnosed with CVS (12 women; age 29.7±12.0,mean±SD),14patientsdiagnosedwithepisodicmigraine (13women;age35.8±13.4),and12healthycontrols(HC,11women, age25.8±3.6).Allparticipantswereright-handed.Written informed consentwasobtainedfromallparticipants,andtheprotocolwasap- proved by theHumanResearchCommittee of PartnersHealthcare andMassachusettsGeneralHospital.
Importantly,CVSpatientswereenrolledpriortosignificantneu- romodulatory pharmacotherapy (e.g. benzodiazepines, anticonvul- sants, andopioids).While this affected enrollment and sample size, maintainingthisstrictcriterionwasimportanttolimitpotentialfalse positivegroupdifferencesrelatedtodrug-inducedalterationsinneu- rovascularcoupling.InclusioncriteriaforCVSwereage18–80,diag- nosis ofCVS byRome III criteria, and English proficiency. Inclusion criterion forHCwas age18–64.Exclusion criteria forCVSandHC werepregnancy(orplannedpregnancy),acute illness,chronic illness suchaskidneyfailure,congestiveheartfailure,diabetes,thoseawait- ingorgantransplantation,useofprescriptionbenzodiazepineswithin theprevious7days,useofprescriptionopioids,useofcannabinoids withintheprevious7days,andanynausea/vomitingepisodewithin 48hours prior to experimental session. CVS patientswere also re- quiredtoavoidalcoholforatleast24hourspriortotesting,andnot to drink coffee (or caffeinated beverages) or smoke in themorning ofthedayoftesting.Inclusioncriteriaforepisodicmigrainepatients wereage18–60,diagnosisofmigrainebasedonclassificationbythe InternationalHeadacheSociety (HeadacheClassificationCommittee of the International Headache Society, 2004), and 2–15 uncompli- catedmigraineepisodespermonth.Exclusioncriteriaincludedother neurological ormajor psychiatric disorders. Similar to CVS andHC, noneoftheenrolledmigrainepatientswereusingprescriptionbenzo- diazepines,opioids,orcannabinoids.
AllCVS(140.5±189.6dayssincepreviousepisode,mean±SD)and migraine (6.1±5.8days since previous episode) patientswere in an interictalstateatthetimeofMRIscanning.AShapiro–Wilktestfor normalitydidnotindicatethatinterictalindexdatawasnon-normally distributedforeitherpatientgroup(CVS:0.94,P=.58;Migraine:0.93, P=.29).
Functional integrity of SLN and SMNwas assessed using in- trinsicnetworkanalysisofrestingstatefMRIdata.Heartrateand respirationweremonitored and used for physiological noise cor- rectionof the fMRIdata.Thedatawere corrected formotionar- tifacts, spatially smoothed (FWHM=5mm), and high-pass filtered
Key Points • CyclicVomitingSyndrome (CVS) andEpisodicMigraine have been suggested to share pathophysiology, but no studieshaveyetcomparedtheseconditions.
• CVS, compared to migraine and healthy controls, dis- playedincreasedconnectivitybetweenthesaliencebrain networkandthemid/posteriorinsula,abrainregionim- portantforviscerosensoryprocessing.BothCVSandmi- grainedisplayeddiminishedinsularconnectivitywiththe sensorimotornetwork.
• We identify both CVS-unique and potentially shared pathophysiology between CVS and episodic migraine, highlightingthemiddle/posteriorinsulaasapotentialtar- getfortherapeuticsinfuturestudies.
| 3ELLINGSEN Et aL.
(f>0.008).AdualregressionIndependentComponentsAnalysiswas performed to identify SLN (Fig. S2) and SMN (Fig. S3) networks, basedoncanonicaltemplatematching.ToinvestigatewhetherSLN connectivitydifferedbetweenCVSandHC,weperformedawhole- brainmixedeffectsanalysis(FSL-FLAME1+2,clustercorrectedfor multiple comparisons at FWE corrected P<.05), followed up by crossgroupregion-of-interest (ROI)analyses (seeDataS1forad- ditionaldetails).
3 | RESULTS
Thewhole-brainanalysisrevealedthat,comparedtoHC,CVSdem- onstratedincreasedSLNconnectivitytoaclusterencompassingpos- terior/middle insula(p/mINS),secondarysomatosensorycortex,and superior temporal sulcus (Fig.1A). A follow-up ROI analysis of this clusterevaluatedconnectivityrelativetomigraine,andfoundasignifi- cantAnalysisofVariance(ANOVA)groupeffectforSLNconnectivity (F(2,36)=12.7,P<.001),withadirectcontrastshowingincreasedSLN connectivityforCVScomparedtomigraine(95%confidenceinterval (CI)0.55–1.18,P=.012)(Fig.1B).Next,anROIanalysiswasperformed toevaluateifthisregion(p/mINS)alsoshowedalteredSMNconnec- tivity.TherewasagainasignificantANOVAgroupeffect(F(2,36)=5.3, P=.01),withgroup-wisecontrastsdisplayingreducedSMNconnectiv- itytothisp/mINSclusterforCVSrelativetoHC(CI−0.94to−0.191, P=.004),butnotmigraine(CI−0.46to0.26,P=.57)(Fig.1C).Infact, similartoCVS,migraineshowedreducedSMNconnectivityrelative toHC(CI−0.83to−0.097,P=.015).
Interestingly, fiveCVSpatients reportedmigrainediagnoses, re- flecting the noted comorbidity of these disorders.1 To investigate whether such comorbidity influenced the results, we performed
theaboveROIanalysescontrolling formigrainediagnosis. Including thisconfound regressor in themodeldidnot influenceANOVAsig- nificance (SLN:F(3,35)=8.28,P=.001;SMN:F(3,35)=3.46,P=.027). Similarly,as8ofthemigrainepatientsalsoreportedsomerecurring nauseaduringepisodes,weperformedtheaboveROIanalysescon- trollingfornauseareport. Includingthisconfoundregressoralsodid notinfluenceANOVAsignificance(SLN:F(3,35)=8.52,P<.001;SMN: F(3,35)=3.44,P=.027)(seeDataS1methodsformoredetail).These findings strengthen the conclusion that increased SLN connectivity with p/mINS is unique toCVS,while reducedSMNconnectivity to this region may characterize pathophysiology underlying both CVS and migraine.
4 | DISCUSSION
Theresults fromthisstudyelucidatealterations inbrainphysiology thatmayunderpinCVS,andidentifiesfeaturesthataredifferentfrom, andsharedwith,episodicmigraine.WhileCVSwascharacterizedby increased connectivity between a salience processing network and p/mINS, this viscerosensory region demonstrated diminished con- nectivity to a somatosensory processing network. Previous studies of episodic migraine have shown disruption of somatosensory and viscerosensorycortexmorphometry16,17andintrinsicconnectivity,16,
18anddisruptedposteriorinsularhabituationresponsestorepeated sensorystimuli.19Furthermore,a recentmeta-analysisof functional neuroimagingstudiesofIrritableBowelSyndrome(IBS)foundm/pINS tobeconsistentlyhyper-activatedinresponsetovisceralstimulation using rectal distension in IBS patients.20 Other idiopathic chronic disorders such as fibromyalgia have also been characterized by al- teredintrinsicsomatosensoryconnectivity,21suggestingthatchronic
F IGURE 1 Alteredfunctionalconnectivityofmiddle/posteriorinsula(m/pINS)withsalience(SLN)andsomatosensory(SMN)processing brainnetworksinCyclicVomitingSyndrome(CVS),episodicmigraine(MIG),andhealthycontrols(HC).(A)Awhole-brainvoxelwiseanalysis foundthatCVS,relativetoHC,showedincreasedrestingSLNfunctionalconnectivitytom/pINS.(B)Afollow-upregionofinterest(ROI)analysis foundthatCVSalsoshowedincreasedm/pINSconnectivitywithSLNcomparedtointerictalMIG.(C)AROIanalysisalsoindicatedsimilarity betweenCVSandMIG,inthatbothshoweddiminishedm/pINSconnectivitytoSMN,relativetoHC.Errorbarsrepresentstandarderrorsofthe mean. *P<.05; **P<.01
4 | ELLINGSEN Et aL.
suffering from somato-visceral symptomatology can alter intrinsic brainphysiology.
InCVS,butnotmigrainepatients,reductionsinm/pINSconnec- tivity to SMN was accompanied by increased m/pINS connectivity toSLN, compared tohealthy individuals.Thismay signify increased vigilanceofviscerosensorysignalsinCVSpatients,whichbearssimi- laritywiththerecentfindingthatsustaineddeep-tissuepainstimula- tionischaracterizedbyaSMN-to-SLNshiftinconnectivityinhealthy individuals.15
The mid/posterior insula has also been proposed as a primary viscerosensory-processing region, supported by neuroimaging stud- ies of experimentally induced nausea,6, 9 and the observation that direct electrocortical stimulation of central and posterior portions of the insulaelicitsvisceroceptivesensationssuchasnausea, stom- ach“buzzing”,etc.7.Thus,thisbrainregionmaybeapotentialtarget fortherapeutics.For instance,pregabalinhasbeenshowntomodu- lateposterior insularglutamate levelsandfunctionalconnectivity in chronicpainpatients.22
Severallimitationsshouldbenoted.Firstly,ascross-sectionalfMRI studieslimitinferencesaboutcausality,futurestudiesshouldaddress thedegreetowhichdisruptedm/pINSconnectivityisaconsequence oracauseofthesedisorders.Secondly,asallpatientswereinterictal at thetimeof testing, the resultscannot informusofbrainmecha- nisms involved during CVS attacks. However, fMRI during ongoing CVSepisodeswouldbepractically andethically challenging, due to patient discomfort and the risk ofvomitingwhile scanning in a su- pineposition.Itisneverthelessstrikingthatconsistentdisruptionsof theSLNandSMNnetworkscanbeobservedevenbetweenepisodes, consistentwithfindingsof altered intrinsic connectivity in interictal episodicmigraine.18Althoughwedidnotfindevidenceforlimbic(e.g. amygdala,hypothalamus)orbrainstemcircuitryashavingdifferential connectivitytoSLNorSMN, it ispossiblethat limbic/brainstemcir- cuitrymaybemoreinvolvedduringactualepisodesratherthanduring aninterictalstate.
In sum,whileCVShasbeen linked to episodicmigraine, little is knownabouttheprecisebrain-basedmechanismsunderpinningCVS, and whether these associated conditions share similar pathophysi- ology. Inourstudy,adirectcomparisonbetweenCVSandmigraine identifiedbothsimilaritiesanddifferencesinfunctionalnetworkinteg- rity,indicatingthatwhiledisruptionofsomatosensoryprocessing(i.e. SMNconnectivity)inthemid/posteriorinsulaissharedbetweenCVS andmigraine,increasedSLNconnectivitytothisviscerosensoryregion maybeuniquetoCVS,proposingatargetforfuturetherapeutics.
DISCLOSURES
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
VN,BKstudyconceptanddesign;RGG,JL,RLL,JK,AHT,SC,LDac- quisitionofdata;DME,VN,BKanalysis and interpretationofdata;
DME,VNdraftingofthemanuscript;DME,RGG,JL,NH,BK,VNcriti- calrevisionofthemanuscriptforimportantintellectualcontent;DME, VNstatisticalanalysis;BK,VNobtainedfunding;BK,VNtechnical,or materialsupport;BK,VNstudysupervision.
REFERENCES
1. Chelimsky G, Madan S, Alshekhlee A, Heller E, McNeeley K, ChelimskyT.AcomparisonofdysautonomiascomorbidwithCyclic Vomiting Syndrome and with migraine. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:701019.
2. GormleyP,AnttilaV,WinsvoldBS, et al.Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraine.Nat Genet. 2016;48:856–866.
3. BolesRG,ZakiEA,LavenbargT,etal.Arepediatricandadult-onset Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS) biologically different conditions? Relationshipofadult-onsetCVSwiththemigraineandpediatricCVS- associated common mtDNA polymorphisms 16519T and 3010A. Neurogastroenterol Motil.2009;21:936–e972.
4. Pareek N, Fleisher DR, Abell T. Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: what a gastroenterologist needs to know. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2832–2840.
5. KowalczykM,ParkmanH,WardL.AdultCyclicVomitingSyndrome successfully treatedwith intranasal sumatriptan. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:88–91.
6. Napadow V, Sheehan JD, Kim J, et al. The brain circuitry under- lying the temporal evolution of nausea in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:806–813.
7. Stephani C, Vaca GFB, Maciunas R, Koubeissi M, Luders HO. Functional neuroanatomy of the insular lobe. Brain Struct Funct. 2011;216:137–149.
8. Farb NAS, Segal ZV, Anderson AK. Attentional modulation of pri- mary interoceptive and exteroceptive cortices. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:114–126.
9. ScloccoR,KimJ,GarciaRG,etal.Braincircuitry supportingmulti- organ autonomic outflow in response to nausea. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:485–497.
10. TillischK,LabusJS.Advancesinimagingthebrain-gutaxis:functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:407–411 e401.
11. FoxMD,GreiciusM.Clinicalapplicationsofrestingstatefunctional connectivity.Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:19.
12. Maleki N, Gollub R. What have we learned from brain func- tional connectivity studies in migraine headache? Headache. 2016;56:453–461.
13. Menon V, Uddin LQ. Saliency, switching, attention and con- trol: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct. 2010;214:655–667.
14. KucyiA,DavisKD.Thedynamicpainconnectome.Trends Neurosci. 2015;38:86–95.
15. KimJ, LoggiaML,EdwardsRR,WasanAD,GollubRL,NapadowV. Sustaineddeep-tissuepainaltersfunctionalbrainconnectivity.Pain. 2013;154:1343–1351.
16. HubbardCS,KhanSA,KeaserML,MathurVA,GoyalM,Seminowicz DA. Altered brain structure and function correlate with disease severity and pain catastrophizing in migraine patients. eNeuro. 2014;1:e20.14.
17. DaSilva AF, Granziera C, Snyder J, Hadjikhani N. Thickening in the somatosensory cortex of patients with migraine. Neurology. 2007;69:1990–1995.
18. HadjikhaniN,WardN,BoshyanJ,etal.Themissing link:enhanced functionalconnectivitybetweenamygdalaandvisceroceptivecortex in migraine. Cephalalgia.2013;33:1264–1268.
| 5ELLINGSEN Et aL.
19. Lee J, Lin RL, Garcia RG, et al. Reduced insula habituation as- sociated with amplification of trigeminal brainstem input in mi- graine [published online August 13 2016]. Cephalalgia. doi: 10.1177/0333102416665223.
20. TillischK,MayerEA,LabusJS.Quantitativemeta-analysisidentifies brainregionsactivatedduringrectaldistensioninirritablebowelsyn- drome. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:91–100.
21. KimJ,LoggiaML,CahalanCM,etal.Thesomatosensorylinkinfibro- myalgia:functionalconnectivityoftheprimarysomatosensorycortex isalteredbysustainedpainandisassociatedwithclinical/autonomic dysfunction.Arthritis Rheumatol.2015;67:1395–1405.
22. HarrisRE,NapadowV,HugginsJP,etal.Pregabalinrectifiesaberrant brainchemistry,connectivity,andfunctionalresponseinchronicpain patients.Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1453–1464.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
AdditionalSupportingInformationmaybefoundonlineinthesupport- inginformationtabforthisarticle.