Current State of U.S. Ethanol Bruce Babcock Iowa State University
Dec 15, 2015
Current State of U.S. Ethanol
Bruce BabcockIowa State University
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Ja
n-00
Jul-0
0Ja
n-01
Jul-0
1Ja
n-02
Jul-0
2Ja
n-03
Jul-0
3Ja
n-04
Jul-0
4Ja
n-05
Jul-0
5Ja
n-06
Jul-0
6Ja
n-07
Jul-0
7Ja
n-08
Jul-0
8Ja
n-09
Jul-0
9Ja
n-10
Jul-1
0Ja
n-11
Jul-1
1Ja
n-12
US
cent
s pe
r lite
rReturns over operating costs for a corn ethanol plant
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
mill
ion
gallo
nsUS Ethanol Production
Down 1.8% in 2012
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Billi
on G
allo
nsUS Finished Motor Fuel Consumption
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Billi
on G
allo
nsUS Gasoline Consumption Has Declined
Substantially More than Fuel Consumption
Finished Motor Gasoline Gasoline
Value Offered by Ethanol
• Source of energy to drive autos– Ethanol has 2/3rds the energy as gasoline
• Source of octane– Ethanol is a high octane (rating = 110) fuel
• Source of oxygenate– Allows fuel to burn more completely, thereby
reducing emissions
Willingness to Pay for Ethanol
• Source of energy?– 70% of the price of gasoline
• Source of octane?– Toulene costs $4.00 per gallon– Production of toulene is 4 billion liters versus 50
billion liters of ethanol
Willingness to Pay for Ethanol
• Ethanol is a high octane fuel (octane = 110)
• 90% blend of 84.4 octane gasoline plus 10% ethanol = “regular” US gasoline (87 octane)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
billi
on li
ters
Cap on Corn Ethanol,Floor on Conventional Biofuels
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
$ pe
r ton
US Cents per liter
Willingness to Pay for Corn by Ethanol Plants
Energy value of ethanol at today’s crude oil prices
WTP for corn at ethanol’s energy value
Price of corn in 2006
$100 per ton arbitrage profit
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
$ pe
r ton
US Cents per liter
Willingness to Pay for Corn by Ethanol Plants
Current US price for ethanol
Current US price for corn
Impacts of Drought on Corn Supplies
• Expected 2012 Production– 360 million tons
• USDA August 10th Projections– 275 million tons of corn (down 24%)
The Problem
• US corn use was 317 million tons in 2011– 127 million for ethanol– 117 million for feed– 40 million for exports– 36 million for food and seed
• With total supplies of 285 million tons and 2011 use of 317, U.S. is “short” 32 million tons of corn
Price Movement
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.007/
21/2
010
8/21
/201
0
9/21
/201
0
10/2
1/20
10
11/2
1/20
10
12/2
1/20
10
1/21
/201
1
2/21
/201
1
3/21
/201
1
4/21
/201
1
5/21
/201
1
6/21
/201
1
7/21
/201
1
8/21
/201
1
9/21
/201
1
10/2
1/20
11
11/2
1/20
11
12/2
1/20
11
1/21
/201
2
2/21
/201
2
3/21
/201
2
4/21
/201
2
5/21
/201
2
6/21
/201
2
7/21
/201
2
$ p
er b
ush
el
Some elasticity arithmetic
• Supply contracted by about 25%• Price increased by about 50%• Implied total demand elasticity = -0.5
• But price likely would have fallen in the summer without a drought– Price elasticity lower than -0.5 because demand
for ethanol is likely quite price inelastic
0.060
0.065
0.070
0.075
0.080
0.085
0.090
0.095
0.100
0.105Ja
n-20
09
Mar
-200
9
May
-200
9
Jul-2
009
Sep-
2009
Nov
-200
9
Jan-
2010
Mar
-201
0
May
-201
0
Jul-2
010
Sep-
2010
Nov
-201
0
Jan-
2011
Mar
-201
1
May
-201
1
Jul-2
011
Sep-
2011
Nov
-201
1
Jan-
2012
Mar
-201
2
May
-201
2
Jul-2
012
Ratio of US Ethanol Consumption to Gasoline Consumption since 2009
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (6months
US Mandate Has Not Been Binding Until Perhaps This Year
Mandated Consumption US Ethanol Consumption
0.060
0.065
0.070
0.075
0.080
0.085
0.090
0.095
0.100
0.105
Jan-
2009
Apr-
2009
Jul-2
009
Oct
-200
9
Jan-
2010
Apr-
2010
Jul-2
010
Oct
-201
0
Jan-
2011
Apr-
2011
Jul-2
011
Oct
-201
1
Jan-
2012
Apr-
2012
Jul-2
012
Mandated versus Actual Consumption of Ethanol
Actual Consumption
Mandated Consumption
Current Situation
• Two U.S. governors at the behest of livestock industries have asked for a mandate waiver
• U.S. will be short of feed.
• Will waiver reduce ethanol consumption?
What is Demand Elasticity for Ethanol?
• Is ethanol a close substitute for gasoline?– In Brazil, yes if FFVs are using ethanol– In US, yes if ethanol is being used for its energy value as a
fuel
• Or is ethanol a complement to gasoline?– Yes if Brazilian FFVS are running on gasoline and there is a
20% blend mandate– Yes if refineries are configured to need octane to produce
87 octane gasoline– Yes if oil companies are mandated to use ethanol
Will Refineries Switch from Ethanol?
• If switching costs are greater than the cost of using ethanol, refineries will not switch
• If waiver lasts 12 months, refineries will need to switch back in the fall of 2013.
• If price of ethanol < price of gasoline, no benefit from switching
• Some price of ethanol above price of gasoline will result in a benefit to switching
Switching Costs
• Fuel attributes regulated by EPA• Different methods of meeting fuel standards,
but costs of switching from one method to another are significant.
• Difficult for a non-insider to estimate
Price of gasoline
Price of ethanol where switching makes sense
Quantity at 10% Blend
Q
P
$2.90/gal = $320/ton = $8.60 futures
$3.40/gal = $380/ton = $10.00 futures
Observations
• Importance of reality of short-run inelasticities often overlooked by market-oriented economists
• Degree of long-run flexibility underestimated by industry-following economists
• Prediction: – Some low-cost, reversible flexibilities will be found by
refineries if a waiver is granted so prices will not increase to $10.00
– But price of corn is too low now to induce switching. Price will have to rise
Lessons Learned
• Thought that corn use for ethanol could be turned off if supplies are short was misguided.– High price of crude oil combined with short-run
inflexibilities limit the ability to switch from corn to crude• Idea of a flexible mandate makes no sense if crude is
high and switching costs are important• Better to be like Brazil and to be in the elastic portion
of ethanol demand• US is not ready to embrace biofuels to the extent
that demand will be elastic