Top Banner
CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON CAMPYLOBACTER ECOLOGY Irene Hanning Assistant Professor University of Tennessee Department of Food Science and Technology e-mail [email protected]
34

Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Jun 25, 2015

Download

Business

dedmark

Presented at 2013 Arkansas Association for Food Protection annual conference.

Irene Hanning
Assistant Professor
University of Tennessee
Department of Food Science and Technology
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON CAMPYLOBACTER ECOLOGY

Irene HanningAssistant ProfessorUniversity of TennesseeDepartment of Food Science and Technologye-mail [email protected]

Page 2: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology
Page 3: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology
Page 4: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter•Leading cause of foodborne bacterial illness

•Non-robust pathogen

•Susceptible to most stresses•Temperature

•pH

•Desiccation

•Colonizes poultry as a commensal

•Colonizes the gastrointestinal tract of poultry about 2 to 3 wks of age

Page 5: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter

Colonizes the gastrointestinal tract about 2 to 3 wks of age?

Gut development

•Histological development

•Mucus layer

•Microbial colonization

Page 6: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Histological development

•Early absorption of yolk sac stimulates peristalsis, microvilli development, and mucus secretion

•Lengthening of the villi promoted by feed intake due to a need for increase surface area for absorption of nutrients

•Delayed access to first feed causes a reduction in the villus surface area, particularly in the jejunum (Geyra et al., 2001).

Page 7: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Histological development• Ecology of microflora impacts histology of the GI tract

• Germ-free birds show reduction in relative weight and length of intestines.

• Altered amounts of lamina propria, lymphoid tissue, reticuloendothelial cells, intestinal weight and moisture in germ-free birds (Stutz et al. 1983).

Page 8: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Mucus layer

•Provides innate immunity

•Forms supportive and protective barrier

•Development is influenced by access to feed post-hatch

•Highly glycosolayted mucins provide attachment sites for microflora

Page 9: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Mucus layer

Mucus production begins at 3d prior to hatch

Page 10: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Mucus layer

Campylobacter colonizes deep in the mucin layer

•Forms protective barrier

•Creates a microaerophilic niche

•Campylobacter can utilize mucin as a carbon source

•Chemoattractant

Page 11: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Intestinal community

• Educate the immune system• Protection from pathogen colonization• Taking up space• Production of antimicrobial substances

• Synthesize vitamins• Breakdown indigestible substances• Reduce allergic responses• Impact nutrient acquisition

Page 12: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Intestinal community

•Campylobacter does not possess genes for phosphofructokinase

•Community dependent because it needs secondary metabolites

•Community stimulates production of mucin

Page 13: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

CampylobacterDynamics of the intestinal community

Page 14: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter

Campylobacter colonizes the gastrointestinal tract about 2 to 3 wks of age because…..

•Gut development

•Microaerophilic environment

•Community dependent

•No phosphofructokinase

Page 15: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

CampylobacterHow is Campylobacter affected by the community?

How does Campylobacter change with the community

Page 16: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Microbial Populations

• Gene transfer

• Quorum sensing

• Resistance

• Gut fermentation

• Degradation

• Cooperation

• Competition

• Predation

Functions and Actions

Page 17: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Microbial Populations

•Biofilms

•Spoilage

•Soil

•Water microcosms

•GutLocation, location, location……

Page 18: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Biofilms

•Support susceptible

organisms

•Resist environmental

stresses

•Quorum sensing

(intra and inter-

species

communication

Campylobacter

Page 19: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter

•Diversity in genotypes increases over rearing period

•C. jejuni is replaced by C. coli

Campy and the community

0

20

40

60

80

100C. je-juniC. coli

Page 20: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

CampylobacterHow is Campylobacter affected by the intestinal community?

How does Campylobacter change with the intestinal community?

Page 21: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Antibiotics• Tend to “stabilize” the gut populations

• Antibiotics reduce the relative weight and length of the intestines (Visek, 1978; Postma et al., 1999).

• Increase growth rate• Improve health• Reduce infections

Page 22: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter gains resistance from the community

• Growth promoter in poultry production

• Controls coccidiosis

• Bioconverted to arsenate (AsV) and arsenite (AsIII) in poultry litter

• Birds ingest arsenic compounds while pecking at the litter

Roxersone

Page 23: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter gains resistance from the environment

• Fluoroquinolones used in poultry production

• Results in Cipro-resistant Campylobacter

• Banned in 2005

• Resistance conferred fitness in the absence of selection pressure……

……..Hence persistence of resistance

Page 24: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter gains resistance from the environment

• Tylosin – a macrolide used in chickens as therapeutic/prophylactic agents for the control of chronic respiratory diseases caused by mycoplasmas and as subtherapeutic agents for improving growth rates and feed efficiency

• At 0.53 g/L of water -reduced Campy and no resistance obtained

• At 0.05g /Kg of feed – Campy resistance emerged

• Highly resistant strains with mutation in the 23S RNA gene

• Lower resistance levels no mutation, utilized CmeABC efflux pump

Page 25: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter control efforts

Preharvest• Antibiotics• Direct fed antimicrobials• Probiotics• Vaccination• Bacteriocins

Page 26: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter control efforts

•Should be targeted at the production level

•Affordable

•How and when?

•If we target C. jejuni will we leave a niche for C. coli?

•Candidate genes should be conserved among strains

Vaccines

Page 27: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter

Direct Fed Antimicrobials

Page 28: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter control efforts

Belguim study reports lowering load of Campylobacter by 2 logs would reduce the number of cases by 84% (Messens et al. 2007)

Danish study reports 2 logs can reduce incidences by 97% (Rosenquist et al. 2003)

Page 29: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter control efforts

• Increase scalding water temperature• Improve evisceration techniques• More water during processing• Forced air-chilling• Disinfectants in the water………….Reducing exposure of carcasses to fecal materials

Page 30: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Consumer food safety

Page 31: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Consumer food safety

Food safety in the home

Page 32: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Campylobacter control efforts

Pre-Harvestantimicrobials, vaccines, probiotics, etc..

ProcessingAntimicrobials, temperature, etc..

ConsumerEducation

Post-HarvestPackagingTemperature

Page 33: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

AcknowledgementsU of Arkansas

• Poultry Science• Mike Slavik• Dan Donoghue• John Marcy• Yan-Bin Li• Casey Owens• Billy Hargis• Hong Wang• Geetha Kumar• Ann Woo-ming

• Food Science• Steve Ricke• Phil Crandall• John-Francios Meullenet• Latha Devereddy• Sun-Yook Lee

• Biological Sciences• David McNabb• Ines Pinto• Carmen Padilla

• Chemistry• Roger Koeppe

• Animal Sciences• Charlie Rosenkrans

• Plant Sciences• Ken Korth• Carlos Avilos

• UTK• Qixin Zhong• Michael Davidson• Ann Draughon• David Golden• John Mount• Frederico Harte• William Morris• Doris D’Souza• Dwight Loveday• Jennifer Richards• Svetlana Zivanovic• Chayapa

Techathuvanan• Bill Brown• Steve Oliver

• Chicago Field Museum• Jacques Hill

• U of Delaware• Mark Parcells

• U of Minnesota• Tim Johnson• Randall Singer

• MIT• Eric Alm• Arne Materna• Lawrence David

• Cobb-Vantress• Robin Jarquin• Joe Schultz

• Tyson Foods, Inc.• John

• Pel-Freeze• Regina Stowe

• Gerber Products• Melanie Reed• Rama Holloway• Susan Allen• Jarius David

• Cargill• Brian Woo-ming

• USDA• Ann Donoghue• Bill Huff• Jerri Huff• Naryan Rath

• FDA• Rajesh Nayak• Steve Foley• Jin Han

Page 34: Current Perspectives on Campylobacter Ecology

Thank You!