Top Banner
Current Indications of Endovascular Management of Infra-inguinal CLI: Cairo University Report Amr Ahmed Gad, MD Prof. of Vascular Surgery Cairo University
28
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Current Indications of Endovascular Management of Infra-inguinal CLI:

Cairo University Report

Amr Ahmed Gad, MD

Prof. of Vascular Surgery

Cairo University

Page 2: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

The Consensus Document of the European Working Group Defined CLI as The Most Severe Clinical

Manifestation of PAD

• Persistent rest pain ( 74%) :Requiring analgesics for 2 weeksResting Ankle pressure < 50 mmHg Resting Toe pressure < 30 mmHg

OR

• Presence of gangrene (34%) orulcer (32%) of the foot / toes :With the same resting pressure

Page 3: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Prognosis of CLI is often Poor

1- One - year mortality is 25 % ( directly or indirectly )

[Balmer etal, 2002]

2- Quality of life indices (psychological testing) , similar to terminal phases of cancer

3- 150000 pat. require LL amputation in USA

4- Prognosis after amputation is worse

- Periop. mortality [ 5% -10% for BKA ][ 15%-20% for AKA]

- After amputation : - 2 years mortality 40%- Sec. amputation 30%- Full mobility 50% in BKA

25% in AKA[ Schainfeld & Inser (1999) CLI: Nothing to give at the office?]

Page 4: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-inguinal CLI Common Femoral Artery Lesions

• Only 13.1% of CLI

• Surgery(Endarterectomy) Long term patency: 91% to 96%Sec. patency & Limb salvage: 100%Maintains the artery for endovascular access

( Schrijver , etal , 2010 )

• Endovascular treatment- PTA : poorer results (? 100% tech success)- Prim stent : Accepted midterm results

Limits future endovascular access Risk of fracture(Hip joint) very old & fragile pt Isolated lesionNo limit for subsequent surgery

[Stricker ,etal , 2004]

Page 5: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-inguinal CLI Femoro-Popliteal Lesions

Approx 60% of CLI

Historically Surg. was primary strategy ,

NOW increasingly replaced by Endovascular treatment as 1st line therapy

The ideal bypass conduit is LSVFemoro-pop. Bypass - Primary 5-year patency rates (63-75%) - Secondary patency rates (80-83%) - Limb salvage rates (84-92%)

( Rutherford ,2000)

Page 6: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Femoro-Popliteal Lesions

BASIL Trial ( Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg )

-Stand as benchmark for current surgical practice -Reflects current results of limb salvage procedures

Conclusion :

Non-inferiority of Endovascular therapy compared to Surgery

. Identical rates of 2-year

amp. free survival

. Lower mortality rate

. Lower complication rate

. Lower cost

. Higher Reintervension rate

Page 7: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Femoro-Popliteal Lesion

Stent Implantation:May improve initial technical success1- Create homogenous tubular lumen by abolishing effect of :

- Obst. Dissections.

- Occluding intimal flaps.

- Residual stenosis.

2- Prevent elastic recoil & delayed constrictive remodeling

3- But increases the amount of myointimal hyperplasia

Page 8: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Endovascular Therapy in Infra-inguinal CLI Cairo university

Total No. : ( Jan. 2010 – June 2013 ) 262 Limb

Group (A) : Femoro-popliteal Disease 136 Limb

Group (B) : Infra-popliteal Disease 126 Limb

Page 9: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

• 136 limbs• Males (67.64%)• Mean age : 62.5(50-75 Y)• Diabetics : 63.23%• TASC Class : A (0.00% )

B (22.05%)C (22.05%)D (55.9% )

PTA for Femoro-Popliteal Segment in CLI (Group A)

Cairo university

Page 10: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

3 subgroups according to the length of the lesion

• < 5 cm : 16.17%

• 5 to 10 cm : 44.11 %

• > 10 cm : 39.7 %

PTA of Femoro-Popliteal Segment in CLI(Group A)(Cairo University )

Page 11: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

• Technical success : 97.05 %• Prim. Patency at 1&2 Y : 79.41% & 67.64%• Sec. patency at 1&2 Y : 84.55% & 75.00%• Limb salvage rate at 1&2 Y

: 92.00% & 83.80%• Comp. 8.82%

PTA for Femoro-Popliteal Segment in CLI (Group A)

Cairo university

Page 12: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

PTA for femoro-popliteal segment in CLI(Group A)Cairo University

Length of lesion 1ry patency 2ry patency

1 year 2 year 1 year 2 year

<5 cm 92.0% 85.3% 95.6% 88.23%

5-10 cm 80.88% 70.5% 83.8% 78.0%

>10 cm 55.00% 0.00% 62.5% 33.8%

Patency rates in relation to the length of the lesion

Page 13: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-Popliteal DiseaseBTK

• About half of pt. with CLI(diabetic & aging population)

• Meta-analysis of studies (1992-1998) of distal bypass vein graft reported:

5 year graft prim patency ( 63 %)5 year graft sec. patency (70 %)5 year limb salvage rate (78 %)LSV 1st choice /any autologous veinPTFE is not recommended

(Singer & Baumgartner , CX , 2013)

• BASIL trial did not report subgroup data on distal revascularization

Page 14: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-Popliteal DiseaseBTK

• Primary aim of PTA in BTK :

- Restore at least one straight line of blood flow to the ischaemic foot

- Maintain patency of treated A. for as long as possible or at least to allow:

- ulcer healing

- pain relief

- avoid rec. of CLI

(TASC I&II)

Page 15: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-Popliteal DiseaseBTK

• Recently there is switch to :

- Maximal revascularization: “the more the better”= higher

chance to keep at least one

vessel patent over time

- Angiosome concept :

focus on wound related

artery rather than to

maximize the flow

Page 16: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Infra-Popliteal DiseaseBTK

• Due to evolution of techniques & availability of dedicated materials , The ENOVASCULAR 1st- line approach to BTK should be preferred over bypass for nearly all kinds of lesions

(Singer & Baumgartner, CX , 2013)

• It remains that case load & training are important factors for best possible outcome

Page 17: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

PTA of BTK vessels in CLI(Group B)Cairo university

• 126 limbs

• Males : 72.2%

• Mean age : 62.5 (50-75 Y)

• Diabetics : 91.2%

• TASC Class A (9.50%) B (19.5%)C (38.1%) D (33.3%)

Page 18: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

PTA of BTK vessels in CLI(Group B)Cairo university

-Technical success is 93.6 %

-Primary patency at 1 & 2year is 74.6 % & 63.4 %

-Secondary patency at 1 & 2year is 83.33% & 71.42 %

- Limb salvage rate at 1&2 yearis 91.27% & 82.53%

- Procedure comp. rate is 9.5%

Page 19: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Endovascular Management of CLI Group(A&B)

Cairo University

Multilevel occlusion

No. 53

% 20.23

Prim. Patency 75.47% ( 1Y) 50.94% (1Y)

Second. Patency

81.13% ( 2Y) 66.03% (2Y)

Outcome of endovascular treatment of Multilevel disease .

Page 20: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Endovascular Management of CLI Group(A&B)

Cairo University

No. of runoff Vessels

Frequency Percentage Limb salvage at 2 years

1 125 47.7% 80.00%

2 39 14.9% 85.22%

3 98 37.4% 100.00%

Runoff status as a prognostic factor in outcome of endovascular intervention:

Page 21: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Redo CasesFemoro-Pop. Segments

Page 22: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Redo fem. Pop. Bypass after stent occlusion

Page 23: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Current Indications in CLISummary

• CLI is the most severe clinical manifestation of PAD & associated with high M. & M.

• Revascularization has to be attempted as soon as possible

• Endovascular therapy should be the 1st line approach in the majority of pt. with CLI

• Bypass can be an alternative, but should primarily be considered in younger & healthier pt. if autologous vein is available

Page 24: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

• Patency rates & limb salvage are sig. higher in short SFA lesions compared to long lesions > 10 cm

• Multilevel lesions have lower patency rates than single level lesions

• Runoff status is an important prognostic factor in the outcome of endovascular therapy

• Prevalence of diabetes is higher in group B (91.2%) than in group A (63.23%) , and infra-popliteal PTA showed satisfactory results

Current Indications in CLISummary

Page 25: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Recommendations

Technical Recommendations

1- Proximal lesions treated before more distal ones

2- Sequential revascularization

procedures are indicated in

tissue loss

3- Combination of a bypass & PTA may be employed

4- At least one run-off vessel in

the calf to serve as an outflow

Page 26: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Conclusions

• Stronger , randomized data has to be created , supporting the evidence for best endovascular treatment specifically for CLI pt.

• Research has to be focused & intensified on the development of specific peripheral arterial devices as anatomy & pathophysiology of the limb lesion differs significantly from Coronaries.

Page 27: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

• Many extremities with CLI that would certainly have been amputated just a few years ago, can now be salvaged by a variety of techniques available to the trained vascular surgeon.

• Proper selection of the appropriate procedure requires a considerable degree of training , clinical experience and technical skills to achieve optimal results.

Conclusions

Page 28: Current indications of endovascular management of infrai̇nguinal cli

Thank You