Top Banner
Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting
19

Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Amelia Douglas
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault

Working Group C17

May 2010 Meeting

Page 2: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.
Page 3: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Details• 67 Suzlons S88 2.1MW wind turbine-

generator

• 61 turbine-generators sync. to the system before the fault

• B ph to gnd fault on 138kV tie line to wind plant occurred at 22:40 11/25/2009

Page 4: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Suzlons S88 2.1MW wind turbine-generator

• A type 2 wound rotor induction generator with variable rotor resistance

Page 5: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

System One Line

138 kV

Total line length11.9 miles

To Canyon Compression/

Naughton

ToLong Hollow

MUDDY CREEK

143

133

Collector Circuits34.5kV

34.5kV

Fault location mileageFrom Muddy Crk

8.6 miles

MOUNTAIN WIND

9 Turbine Generators

10 Turbine Generators

10 Turbine Generators

9 Turbine Generators

9 Turbine Generators

10 Turbine Generators

10 Turbine Generators

Page 6: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Status at Wind Plant before the

Fault

61 machines sync to system

14.6MW total output

11.4% of nameplate

Page 7: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Mountain Wind Sub 11A relay on line to Muddy Creek

Page 8: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Muddy Creek Sub 11A relay on line to Mountain Wind

Page 9: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Mountain Wind Sub (Wind Plant) Positive Sequence Current

Page 10: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Muddy Creek Sub (System) Positive Sequence Current

Page 11: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Generator Impedance

Page 12: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Generator Data

Page 13: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Using the Asynchronous Generator Values

Xs = 0.0536

Xm = 2.6

Xr = 0.0564

X’ = 0.1088 ohms

Synchronous data

X” = 0.0523 ohms

X’ = 0.0941 ohms

Page 14: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Generator Step up Transformer

Z = 5.75 % @ 2.25MVA

Page 15: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.
Page 16: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Filtered Fault Data

Page 17: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Phasor Data

Page 18: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Comparison of ResultsB Phase I1 I2 I0 I1 + I2 + I0

Measured

Time 1 1.1 cycle 1908 398 297 1092 1786

Time 2 1.9 cycle 1850 330 420 1096 1812

Time 3 3.0 cycle 1650 230 379 963 1535

Time Fault Interrupted 4.1 cycles

Fault Study

Subtransient 1786 396 346 1044 1786

Transient (equivalent synchronous) 1713 343 341 1029 1713

Transient (equivalent asynchronous) 1692 327 339 1025 1692

Faulted phase voltage on closest generator's terminals 0.82 pu

Page 19: Current Contribution from Wind Plant for a System Fault Working Group C17 May 2010 Meeting.

Conclusion

• For relay performance the subtransient reactance using the equivalent synchronous data provides the best fault current values

• For breaker interrupting currents the transient reactance using the calculated value from the equivalent asynchronous data provides the best fault current values