Top Banner
Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention
14

Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Ashley Dean
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

Current and Future Implementation of

Response to Intervention

Page 2: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

2

Local Norm Project

• Hybrid between DIBELs and Skill Builder Probes

• Local norm sample consisted of 576 across 1st-5th grades

• More than 100 students per grade• DIBELS data was from approximately 400

students per grade K-2

Page 3: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

3

Sample From 1st and 2nd Grade

Page 4: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

4

Overall Implementation and Expansion

• 2006/2007 school year RTI procedures were piloted in two elementary schools– One large school (700 students) Springmore– One small school (330 students) Casar

• 2007/2008 implementation expanded into two more large elementary schools– Fallston Elementary (560 students)– Union Elementary (630 students)

Page 5: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

5

Overall Implementation and Expansion

• 2008/2009 two more small elementary schools have started implementation

• 2009/2010 first middle school with an additional two to four elementary schools

Page 6: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

6

Correlation Studies looking at EOG and CBM Assessments

• EOG and ORF correlation coefficients– 3rd grade: .69– 4th grade: .59– 5th grade: .53

• EOG and Maze Fluency correlation coefficients– 3rd grade: .61– 4th grade: .63– 5th grade: .63

Page 7: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

7

Correlation Studies looking at District performance on EOG and

CBM Assessments• EOG and Skill Builder Word Problem

probes correlation coefficients– 3rd grade: .64– 4th grade: .49– 5th grade: .60

Page 8: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

8

3rd Grade EOG Comparison to ORF

225

230

235

240

245

250

255

260

265

270

275

0 50 100 150 200 250

Words Read Per Minute On DIBELs ORF

EO

G R

ea

din

g S

ca

le S

co

re

Page 9: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

9

Benchmarking All RTI Schools K-5th Grade

• All students will be screened three times a year using either DIBELS, Skill Builder probes, or Aims Web Maze Fluency probes

• Teachers will be shown data and told who needs to enter Tier 1

• Teachers will also be shown what skill to teach and what to use to progress monitor each child

Page 10: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

10

Continuing Training

• Refresher trainings are being completed to keep schools current with RTI procedures

• Teachers are used to lead trainings later in the year for new RTI schools in District

• Teacher trainings consist of: How they have fit interventions into the day, what interventions have been used, and overall progress they have seen in their classes

Page 11: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

11

Barriers

• Understanding that process is not more but different

• Teachers understanding purpose and theory behind Curriculum Based Measurements

• Currently lacking middle school norms for needed expansion

Page 12: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

12

Breaking Down Barriers

• Continue training that involves instruction on methods, paperwork, etc. that involves coaching and feedback for teachers

• Continue to show data that validates CBM’s at the local level

• Currently working on developing local middle school norms with a sample of students from all four middle schools in district

Page 13: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

13

Fidelity and Integrity

• Forms have been developed to check on fidelity of interventions and meetings discussing interventions

• Audit form to make sure fidelity of entire Tier III process

• Evaluation data taken from teachers to find out how they feel about the process.

Page 14: Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.

Free powerpoint template: www.brainybetty.com

14

1-5 Likert Type Scale

1=Strongly Disagree

5=Strongly Agree