Top Banner
CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services
12

CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

CTLC Innovative Development Fund

Janey Saunders

Student Services

Page 2: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Transition and Technology

Utilising Innovative Technologies To Address Transitional Issues Faced By Under-represented

Students In Higher Education(Under-represented groups: Low SES, Indigenous, Rural &

Isolated, NESB, Disabilities)

Page 3: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

The Program

• 13 week transition and technology program• 1 session per week• Coordinated through Student Services• Facilitated though Student Mentoring approach• Each session will be dedicated to a particular

topic that addresses academic, social, emotional and cultural needs of the target group

• CTLC innovations will be employed in the teaching and learning practices of this content

Page 4: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Rationale

• Provision of opportunities for under-represented groups. – ‘first in family’ less familiar with the tertiary context and

associated technologies.• Teaching and Learning Enhancement Plan 2003

– 2007– GOAL 3: Flexible and engaging teaching practice

• Students are very positive about the use of ICT to support their studies (Kennedy et al 2006)

Page 5: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Trial Program 2007

Page 6: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Student Services

• Exists to enhance student well-being, learning outcomes, career and life goals;

• Has designed the project to address transitional needs of the target group, with a particular emphasis on learning through technology

Page 7: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Participants

• Linda Bird - Project Leader• Kelly Matthews - Designer and author of project

application• Student Services- Development, coordination,

implementation and evaluation• TEDI- Expert consultant in collaborative best

practices and new technologies• CTLC- Provision of access to and training in

technologies

Page 8: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Objectives for the Target Group

• To incorporate T&L strategies into 1st year transition

• To increase access and use of technologies• To increase learner outcomes for under-

represented groups• To increase retention rates of this target group• To build peer mentoring

Page 9: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Approach

• Foster collaborative T&L practices through the employment of Learning Community Leaders

• Address relevant issues to commencing students through the integration of technology as an educational resource

• Weekly ‘tutorial’ sessions in CTLC with continuing on line discussion via Blackboard

Page 10: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Technology

• Pods - small group modes

• Video conferencing - connecting Gatton & St. Lucia students

• Blogs and other online collaboration tools

• Blackboard site

• Familiarisation with UQ online services

Page 11: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Outcomes

• Retention rates• Academic performance• Integration into University culture-sense of

belonging • First year experience• Access to available services • Spread the word about their great experiences at

UQ• Become loyal alumni of UQ!

Page 12: CTLC Innovative Development Fund Janey Saunders Student Services.

Comments to date

• Where are we now?• Positives• higher overall GPAs • stronger sense of belonging to the university community • perception of being better prepared• Negatives• small sample size with regard to attendance• Bb usage by this cohort was not great, • different faculties made connecting to content difficult,

resulting in generic skills topics. • Heavy reliance on student leaders.