Top Banner

of 12

CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

Jun 04, 2018

Download

Documents

mcwhitney
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    1/12

    CT Failure Modeling

    Experiment Data

    Pt. 2Mary Catherine Whitney3 June 2013

    1

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    2/12

    Method Summary

    Velocity Test

    Configure bow to launchrod at 50mph

    Shoot rod verticallydown into tube against arock

    Used brass rods/tubes

    Steel tubes could not be

    found Compare brass rods to

    brass tubes to see if thereis a difference

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Apply force to contained

    rod until it is displaced a

    set amount of inches

    2

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    3/12

    Method

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Reduced Friction

    Apply force to contained

    rod until it is displaced a

    set amount of inches Every half inch hit the

    tube to reduce force of

    friction

    Gradual Displacement Test-Springback

    When rod has been

    displaced set amount of

    inches, remove oneclosed off side

    Measure movement

    (springback)

    3

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    4/12

    Materials Description

    Rods/Tubes

    Steel Rod

    D: 0.125 in

    L: 48 in

    Brass Rod

    D: 0.125 in

    L: 36 in

    Brass Tube OD: 0.125 in

    ID: 0.0118 in

    L: 36 in

    Guide Tube

    Plexiglass

    OD: 4.75 in

    ID: 4.25 in

    L: 5 ft

    4

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    5/12

    Results Summary

    5

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    6/12

    Strain from Gradual

    Displacement test

    Total Length: 48 in

    Compression 3in

    Axial Strain

    Compressed 3 in

    3/48 = 0.0625

    6.25%

    6

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    7/12

    Velocity Tests 1 4 (brass)

    Vertical Velocity TestGuide Tube ID: 4.25 in

    Pull Length: 20 in

    Tubes and rods buckled before hitting the

    ground due to force of bowtest failure

    Bottom of rod7

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    8/12

    Grad Test 5

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Reduced Friction

    Guide Tube ID: 4.25 in

    Compression Length: 5 inches before

    deformation

    8

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    9/12

    Test 6

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Springback

    Guide Tube ID: 4.25 in

    Compression Length: 3 inches

    Top removedside administering the force

    Springback length: 3 in; back to initial position

    9

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    10/12

    Test 6 - video

    10

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    11/12

    Test 7

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Springback

    Guide Tube ID: 4.25 in

    Compression Length: 3 inches

    Bottom removedside not administering the

    force

    Springback length: 2 in

    11

  • 8/14/2019 CT Failure Modeling Experiment Data - 2

    12/12

    Conclusions

    Velocity Test

    Failure to achieve results

    Gradual Displacement Test -Springback

    Removed top

    Rod that had been

    displaced 3 in is slightlydeformed but returned to

    initial starting position

    Removed bottom

    Rod jumped out of tube,

    moving 2 inches down Top of rod slightly

    deformed

    Gradual Displacement Test

    Reduced Friction

    Rod could be displaced more

    if force of friction is reduced

    Prevents lockup

    Rod only slightly deformed

    while being displaced 5

    inches

    Axial strain: 5/48 = 0.104; 10%12