1 Breakthrough technology roadmap CSF4 Breakthrough technology roadmap Exploring breakthrough technologies for the papermaking industry March 2018
1
Breakthrough technology roadmap
CSF4 Breakthrough
technology roadmap
Exploring breakthrough technologies for
the papermaking industry
March 2018
2
Breakthrough technology roadmap
CSF4 Breakthrough technology roadmap
Exploring breakthrough technologies for the papermaking industry
March 2018
The Dutch paper and board sector consists of 18 companies that run a total of 22 mills. More than 70% of our
production is used for packaging purposes, while 25 % is graphical paper (paper for magazines, brochures, leaflets).
The remaining part are hygiene papers. The main raw material used is recycled paper (80 %). Alternative fibres like
tomato stems, grass, miscanthus and beverage cartons are also increasingly popular. The sector employs 4.000 people.
The sector is cooperating closely in a number of innovation paths. In our innovation strategy CSF (creating sustainable
fibre solutions) teams are working on different subjects, like alternative fibres, sustainable energy, multiple use &
recyclability and breakthrough technologies. Professionals from our member companies participate in the teams.
For more information, please contact Annita Westenbroek (innovation manager of the Royal VNP):
3
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Preface
The Dutch paper and board industry has achieved major material and energy savings in recent years. Good progress
has been made in the use of sustainable energy, increasing recycling rates and promoting circularity. However the core
of the paper making process has hardly changed over the decades.
During that process, water is added and subsequently removed. This requires a lot of energy. Breakthroughs are needed
to dramatically reduce our energy consumption. Therefore, the Dutch paper industry has started a voyage of discovery
towards technologies that will enable paper to be produced in a completely different way.
without water
or
without having to evaporate water
This is the only route towards a carbon neutral sector in 2050 – a journey that starts today. But which technology will
provide the much-needed breakthrough innovation? Such breakthroughs require inspiration and creativity.
We are challenging scientists, students, technology developers, or basically anyone with bright ideas to elaborate on
solutions, especially young people who realize the necessity and are not yet stuck in fixed patterns and processes.
Findest was asked to make a start with this challenge, scouring cyberspace for potential technologies that might support
future papermaking without water or without water evaporation.
The elaborated technologies in this report are just a selection of a vast list. This selection is meant as a start, it is not
meant to be complete or exclusive, neither as a specific direction.
This report shows that we are serious. We mean business. We are willing to invest in a technology that can revolutionise
the papermaking process.
This is a change that will not come from inside the sector. It should come from you!
Be challenged, be inspired, elaborate your ideas and contact us for any help or support required! The following people
contributed to the content of this report:
• Bert Bodewes (Eska)
• Tjerk Boersma (Sappi)
• Bart Broens (Papierfabriek Doetinchem)
• Arie Hooimeijer (KCPK)
• René Kort (Schut Papier)
• Martin van de Pol (Crown Van Gelder)
• Arnoud Roelandse (Neenah Coldenhove)
• Claire Schreurs (Smurfit Kappa Roermond
Papier)
• August Steinkellner (Mayr-Melnhof)
• Eric van Tulden (DS Smith Paper De Hoop)
• Laurens de Vries (KCPK)
• Jan Wattenberg (Parenco)
• Gerrit Jan Koopman (VNP)
• Rutger van Dijk (VNP)
• Corneel Lambregts (VNP)
• Annita Westenbroek (VNP)
• Arie Hooimeijer (KCPK)
• Laurens de Vries (KCPK)
• Ron van Klaveren (Findest)
• Vincent Franken (Findest)
• Jorick Houtkamp (Findest)
• Roel Boekel (Findest)
4
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Dear paper innovator,
Findest and CSF4 have worked together on a breakthrough technologies roadmap containing technical concepts that
will recreate the papermaking process. The goal is to decrease the CO2-emissions and energy-usage required for
papermaking substantially! After two engineering design challenges, two hackathons and analysing thousands scientific
papers, the technology scouts and IGORAI found 50 potential technology fields that can impact the future of
papermaking (see appendix I for the full list). Fourteen of them are described in depth in this document.
Over the past months, the team has dived deep into the science behind each case. They found out if, and how, the
technologies could be applied in the papermaking process. In this document, the fourteen cases will be presented on a
roadmap. The roadmap consists of three dimensions:
1. Technology readiness level (TRL). The TRL is narrowed done to five quickly interpretable levels:
2. Emission reduction potential (ERP). The many differences between the technologies and their implications
on the papermaking process, make it impossible to define a percentage of emission reduction. Therefore, a
three-level scale is determined based on the potential emission reduction.
3. Impact on current papermaking process. The technology scouts have looked at papermaking designs from
various viewpoints. Each viewpoint results in different configurations with varying impact on the current process.
A three-level scale is designed to show the impact of a concept on the current papermaking process.
Commercially available
Large scale pilot
Small scale pilot
Experimental stage
Theoretical stage
Low emission reduction potential
Moderate emission reduction potential
High emission reduction potential
Completely different process
Substantial changes to current process
Minor changes to current process
5
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Index
CSF-4 BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP 6
Case 1 Dry Formation 7
Case 2A Solution Spinning 9
Case 2b Cellulose Solution 11
Case 3 Cross-linking 13
Case 4 Alcohol as a Carrier 15
Case 5 Supercritical Solution 17
Case 6 Supercritical Drying 19
Case 7 Electro Dewatering 21
Case 8 Ultrasonic Dewatering 23
Case 9 Osmotic Dewatering 25
Case 10 Microwave Drying 27
Case 11 Hygroscopic Drying 29
Case 12 Superheated Steam 31
Case 13 Foam Forming 33
Appendix I: Complete technology list 35
Bibliography 39
6
Breakthrough technology roadmap
7
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 1 Dry formation
Introduction
The most challenging aim for energy reduction in papermaking is the complete mitigation of water in the process. This
case encompasses the scouting for techniques that can form a paper-like-web in a dry environment. The use of dry
formation techniques is already broadly applied in the field of nonwoven textile production. Techniques like carding and
needle punching have the aim to align and physically entangle the textile fibres mechanically. Two categories have been
identified: Mechanical web formation and air-based web formation.
Application to papermaking
Air-based web-formation is a technology that is already applied
in papermaking industry on a large scale for the creation of soft
paper products (air laying). The papermaking technique is not yet
able to produce paper with similar strength and properties to wet-
laid papers [1]. The biggest advantages are energy reduction up to
50%, elimination of wastewater treatment, 30-50% reduction in
investment costs, low power and operation costs [2]. Disadvantages
are its increase in electricity use, less uniform paper thickness, lower
sheet strength and reduced smoothness [2]. In 2004 a research
from Aalto University had shown that it is possible to use Air
Dynamic Forming (ADF) as an alternative to conventional papermaking [3]. This technology might be able to overcome
the limitation of traditional air-laying technique.
Mechanical web formation. In literature, there is no evidence for using mechanical nonwoven production techniques
(carding, needle punching) to produce pulp-based nonwovens. The fibre length of a few mm’s can be the underlying
reason which is ten-fold smaller than textile fibres (10-25 mm) while having similar diameters. Further experimental
research is required to develop a mechanical technique to form a paper web.
Potential partners
• Dan-Web
• Anpap
• Rando
• Aalto University: founder of air dynamic forming
Figure 1 Air laid technology © Textile innovation knowledge platform
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
8
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Commercial viability Energy
reduction Paper
strength Water usage recyclability Continuous TRL
Air-laid technology (including ADF)
Yes, Air laid technology is applied on commercial
scale up to 50% Low
None when not accounting for a strength binder
Similar to normal paper
Yes 5-6
Mechanical nonwoven
Biggest challenge will be formation of the short fibre length (1-2mm)
High energy reduction potential
Assumed low
May be required for crosslinking
Expected similar to
normal paper N/A 1-2
Sources [4]–[8]
9
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 2A Solution spinning
Introduction
The main constituent of papermaking pulp is cellulose a natural polymer that, with the proper solvent, can be dissolved.
Dissolved cellulose can be solidified to fibres by using an anti-solvent or by removing the solvent. Fibers can, therefore,
be generated with a tailored length and diameter. It is valuable to explore the properties of such fibres and what
techniques are available to spin such fibres.
Application to papermaking
The technique aims to efficiently remove the solvent from the dissolved cellulose ensuring the aggregation and
solidification of the cellulose. Based on the type of spinning technique a thread or a nonwoven mat can be produced.
The process is applied to create nano-cellulose fibres (crystalline or micro-fibrillated) [9]. The main challenges are to
seek a high-throughput spinneret and use a cheap, scalable, non-volatile and non-toxic solvent [10], [11] (See case
2B). Other challenges are scalability of the technique and paper-like material
spinning [12]. The scouted techniques to create a cellulose web are
electrospinning and solution spinning.
• Electrospinning: Is a technique that uses electricity to extract the
solvent from the cellulose solute. The solution is pressed through a
nozzle into a charged field (kV). In this charged field the solution
evaporates allowing the cellulose to solidify in small fibres (nano- &
microfibers).
• Solution blowing: is based on a liquid (solute) that is pressed through a
nozzle. Solidification occurs using heat to evaporate the solvent and by using an anti-solvent (e.g. water).
Therefore, a rinse and drying step is still required.
Potential partners
• Neenah Gessner
• Lenzing
• Ri.se
• Elmarco
• Areka
Figure 3 Solution blowing
Figure 2 Electrospinning © Textile learner
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
10
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept CO2 emission
reduction
Paper-like
material
Homogeneous application
Bond other fibres
Recyclable Paper web formation
TRL
Electrospinning
Substantial electricity use:
Applied voltage 2-12 kV/cm, flow rate 5-20 µl/min
Yes, Similar to air-laid paper
(nonwoven napkin)
Yes, with electrospinning
it can be tailored
Yes, but fibre strength is not
known
Solvent evaporates
Yes, for example, a nonwoven
napkin is made (Young's modulus
between 5 - 30 Mpa)
5-6
Melt/solution
blowing technique
Hot air pressure is used (140 degrees C), the solution is heated up to 140
degrees C. Coagulation occurs
in water, also washed in water. CO2 drying could
be applied
Nonwoven type of fabric, a
thin or thick web
can be created
Yes Yes, web is
formed
Assumed based on
dissolvability,
but complexity in recycling the solvent (see
case 2B)
Extruded to form a web with
fibres with a diameter of 0.1
mm.
5-6
Airgap spinning / Dry jet wet spinning: Cellulose fibres
Dissolution at 80 degrees C, completely
dissolved after 90 min
Viscose-like
material is created, tenacities above 50
cN/tex and initial
modulus of 34 GPa
No, a thread is created
The spin head allows only to create single spun fibres; a new system should be
designed in which the fibres coagulate in a
web rather than
a spun thread.
Fibre recycling similar to
viscose/rayon recycling.
Recycling of solvent by
evaporation
No 5-6
Sources [13]–[30]
11
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 2b cellulose solution
Introduction
Case 2A has shown that it is theoretically possible to produce a cellulose nonwoven
from a cellulose solution. The solvent for cellulose dissolution plays an important
role in the spin-ability and properties of cellulose. Four solvent-systems have been
determined that can dissolve cellulose while being subject to requirements like
environmental impact and toxicity: NaOH, urea and thiourea, Ionic liquids (ILs),
N-Methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) and Deep Eutectic solvents.
Application to papermaking
Solvents systems based on Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), urea and thiourea can be used in different compositions to
dissolve cellulose. The dissolving occurs in minutes at low temperatures (-10°C to 10°C). Fibre characteristics, when
spun from this system, are with a crystallinity similar to cellulose II (regenerated cellulose) and good mechanical
properties [31].
Ionic Liquids are complex salt structures that are environmental-friendly compared to conventional harmful cellulose
solvents used for viscose production. Cellulose dissolves in room temperature ILs and can be combined with
electrospinning technique [32], [33].
NMMO is the solvent currently used in the Lyocell-process that is less harmful than the volatile viscose process solvents.
Viscose type fibres can be created at temperatures in the range of 80°C to 100°C and solidify in an aqueous bath [34],
[35].
Deep Eutectic solvents are a class of ionic liquids from natural resources with the ability to dissolve cellulose. This new
class of liquids are biodegradable, non-flammable, non-volatile, non-toxic and biocompatible [36]. DESs have been used
in the electrospinning of PVA and Chitin [37], [38].
Potential partners
• Iolitec (ILs)
• Solvionic (ILs)
• Proionic (ILs)
• Lenzing (NMMO)
• Shrieve chemical products (DES patent holder)
Figure 4 Ionic liquids © BASF
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
12
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Scalability Environmental
effects Material
availability Toxicity
Speed of solubility
TRL
NaOH, urea and thiourea in aqueous solution
Scalability complexity is
the low-temperature dissolution
When the solvents are diluted NaOH
and urea are unharmful.
Thiourea affects plant growth
All products readily
available
NaOH LD50 is 40 mg/kg; Thiourea
LD50 is 125 mg/kg furthermore it
inhibits the thyroid function, Urea LD50 is 8500
mg/kg
5 min, -10
to 8 °C 5
Ionic liquid: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (CMIMCl), 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl),
Tetrabutylphosphonium hydroxide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and 1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium diethyl phosphate, Lithium chloride/N, N-dimethylacetamide (LiCl/DMAc), 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
High-temperature processability
ILs claimed to be a "green alternative" for harmful current cellulose solvents
Available but not in
industrial quantities
EMI was negative in the LLNA, the
irritancy assay, and the MEST
A few minutes up to hours at elevated
temperatures
2-3, not applied yet in the
papermaking
process
N-Methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO)
Scalability is determined by
compatibility with
nonwoven spinning
techniques
Considered to be
the most environmental-friendly process,
>98% re
Commercially available
Toxic product and
explosive by-products are
created at elevated temperatures
N/A
8
(applied in
industrial scale)
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs): formic acid: choline chloride, lactic acid: choline chloride, acetic acid: choline chloride, lactic acid: betaine, and lactic acid: proline
Not presented at large scale however small
ecological footprint,
lower price, no waste in process and
no purification make it easier
to scale up the
technology
Biocompatible and biodegradable
Available on large scale
Nontoxic N/A 3-4
Sources: NaOH-Urea-Thiourea [31], [39]–[41], ILs [32], [33], [42]–[47], NMMO [48]–[50], DESs [36]–[38]
13
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 3 cross-linking
Introduction
In paper production, water plays the general role as carrier and facilitator to the resultant paper properties. Especially
the facilitation of web formation and hydrogen bonds between the fibres enable the creation of paper as we know it.
In a scenario that reduces or eliminates water use, cellulosic fibres still need to form a strong web. It is important to be
aware of the cross-linking additives that are available to improve (nearly) dry formed paper sheets. In this scout,
multiple cross-linking additives have been searched. They can be categorised into three groups: Solution-based cross-
linkers for use in nearly-dry sheet formation, dry based cross-linkers for dry sheet formation and dry-based cross-linking
methods.
Application to papermaking
Category 1 – Nearly-dry-sheet formation: In this approach, materials assist
crosslinking when in (aqueous) solvent. This technique does not mitigate
the need for water, and therefore a drying step is still required. However,
it is possible that these cross-linkers can be applied in a low amount of
water to support the crosslinking of water for generating cross-linked bonds
besides the hydrogen bonds.
Category 2 – Dry-sheet formation: For this web formation approach cross-linking additives are added when paper is
dry-formed. Dry-sheet formation can be created using resins to bind paper fibres [51]. The dry formation can be enabled
using bio-based resins and binders.
Category 3 – Dry-based cross-linking methods: The third category encompasses techniques that facilitate solvent free
cross-linking. Two techniques have been observed: Mechanochemical crosslinking and dry-state surface treatment.
Potential partners
• Epson PaperLab (Cat 2)
• Senbis (Cat 2)
• UTwente - Dr.ir. Jos Paulusse, mechanochemistry (Cat 3)
• The Brown research group (Cat 3)
Figure 5 Cellulose crosslinking with citric acid © Cuadro et al. [226]
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
14
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Environmental impact Safety CO2 emission reduction Energy reduction Cost-effective Material
availability TRL
Cat 1 – (Dialdehyde) carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), EDC, adipic dihydrazide, polyelectrolyte complexes [52]–[57]
Low High N/A
In combination with EDC up to 500% and 100% in wet web strength can be achieved,
furthermore substantial energy reduction in the pre-treatment
process for NFC production
N/A High 3-4 (Lab scale)
Cat 2 – Gelatine (thermoformability) [58]
Directly none, indirectly from cattle industry
High N/A N/A
Inexpensive and facile method to
improve plasticity of fibre networks
Medium 3-4
Cat 1 – glutaraldehyde-chitosan, glutaraldehyde-PVA [59], [60]
Aquatic toxicity but can be biologically degraded
Is toxic, so may cause skin irritation, nausea, headache
and breath shortness
Assumed, as partial replacement in water-based production
No high-temperature curing is required to make strength paper.
Less expensive alternative for formaldehyde
High 3-4
Cat 1 – Ester crosslinking: Citric acid (CA), Polyamino carboxylic acid, 1,2,3,4-butane tetracarboxylic acid [61]–[64]
Low, bio-based Exposure to pure citric acid causes adverse effects
Depends, The crosslinker is an additional step in papermaking (using pad-dry-cure process).
Experimental studies must show if this material can be used to increase paper strength of dry-
formed papers
Similar to the previous requirement
It can be applied in an open, paper-like
production plant Available N/A
Cat 1 - Protein: Cellulose crosslinking protein (CCP & CBD) [65]
Environmental-friendly High N/A N/A Costly production Low 2-3
Cat 2 - Enzymatic binder: Laccase [66]
Low Low Assumed, as the laccases can be used to create
a glue-type cross-link as presented in the production of MDF board
Assumed, as dry fibres can be used for MDF production. The
"glue" should be examined for dry laid paper production and press
Yes, if mediator (4-hydroxybenzoic
acid) is used Medium
5-6 (Pilot)
Cat 3 – Dry surface treatment (DST) [67]
Depends on applied coating, For example when PLA is used the
environmental impact is low
High High if the coating material can exclude the use
of water as binder High if the coating material can
exclude the use of water as binder
Cost-effectiveness claimed, can also be used in coating and
sizing process
Depends on binder/polymer/coating
used
3-4
Cat 3 – Mechanochemical crosslinking with succinic anhydride [68]
Environmentally benign technique, however slow biodegradability of PVA
High Low, biggest benefit is the mitigation of toxic
solvents Mechanochemistry is energy
intensive N/A High 3-4
Cat 1 – Waterborne polyurethane (WPU) microemulsions [69]
Medium, uses nondegradable polyurethanes
Inert when PU is fully reacted when combusted CO and HCN are generated
When only used as linker in dry-formed sheets Similar to CO2 reduction Only if high paper quality is achieved
High 5-6
Cat 2 – Green binders for air-laid paper: Proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, phenolic compounds [70]
Low High Only if similar strength to wet-laid can be
reached. Only if similar strength to wet-laid
can be reached. Reasonably priced
Available in large
quantities 5-6
15
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 4 Alcohol as a carrier
Introduction
Water plays an important role in the production of paper. It acts as a swelling agent
for the cellulose fibres which enhance the mutual contact area. It serves as a solvent
for chemical additives, as suspending medium for solids and enables good dispersing
to create a uniform sheet [71]. Water is a strongly polar molecule. The dipole
moment (Figure 6) makes the oxygen partially negative and each hydrogen partially
positive. The dipole moment contributes to hydrogen bonding and explains many of
the properties of water (e.g. capillary action). One of this properties is the very high
specific heat capacity (4.181 J/(g·K) at 25 °C), as well as a high heat of vaporisation (2257 kJ/kg at the normal boiling
point). The high heat of vaporisation results in high energy demand for paper drying.
Application to papermaking
A possible solution space to reduce the energy consumption during paper production is the substitution of water with a
less polar molecule like alcohols. Compared with water the heat of vaporisation of different alcohols (methanol, ethanol,
n-propanol and n-butanol) is much lower which indicate the possibility to reduce the energy needed for paper drying.
Research shows a major downside for the use of alcohols in paper production as the paper strength properties will
greatly decrease. Besides, the use of highly flammable and explosive alcohols at such a large scale is a point of attention.
At last the recyclability must be investigated to make the use of alcohols economically interesting.
Potential partners
• National Centre for Research and Development, Poland
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
Figure 6 Dipole moment of water (H2O) © Riccardo Rovinetti
16
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Medium
Heat of
Vaporization
(kJ/kg)
Braking Length
(m)
Tear Resistance
(mN)
Breaking
Energy (J) Process Safety
Water 2257 8020 581 0.169 None
Methanol 1104 3940 400 0.104 Highly flammable,
Explosive
Ethanol 841 3690 379 0.102 Highly flammable,
Explosive
n-Propanol 760 3020 304 0.096 Highly flammable,
Explosive
n-Butanol 590 1800 177 0.055 Highly flammable,
Explosive
Sources [72], [73]
17
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 5 Supercritical solution
Introduction
In a supercritical solution, the temperature and pressure are brought above the critical point. In the supercritical state,
the distinction between gas and liquid becomes closer to each other because the density of the liquid and gas phase
become more equal. Supercriticality can be advantageous because products tend to dissolve better in a supercritical
solution. The thermos-physical properties can be varied by adjusting operating pressure and temperature. Processes
involving supercritical fluids require less energy and can be more environmentally friendly than solvent-based processes,
due to their physical and chemical properties [74]. Therefore, it is interesting to explore if supercriticality can be applied
to the papermaking process as dispersing solution.
Supercriticality can be used to dissolve cellulose in water. Under
normal conditions, cellulose is insoluble in water but when brought
to supercritical point cellulose can dissolve [75]. Cellulose dissolves
due to a reduction of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and
nearly ceases to exist above 573 K. The self-organisation of the water
molecules decrease, and therefore the crystalline cellulose can be
more easily dissolved [75].
Application to papermaking
The dissolved cellulose can be recrystallised when forced through a nozzle into a low-pressure chamber. This process
is known as Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS). The advantage of this process is good control of particle
size, particle distribution and morphology. Although nothing is explicitly stated about a paper-web like structure, Jung
and Parrut (2001) suggest that RESS can be used for the formation of fibres (cellulose II. [76], [77]). Also, the
advantage of good distribution with RESS indicates that a web-like structure can be created. Water would in the low-
pressure chamber be well above liquid phase and turns into steam.
Potential partners
• Steritech
• ThyssenKrupp
• Aalto University – Lasse Tolonen ([email protected])
Figure 7 Energy Efficiency and Management in Food Processing Facilities © Wang, L. [78]
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
18
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Technique Energy reduction potential Commercial viability Scalability Open process
compatibility TRL
Pulp/cellulose in
supercritical
solution
Estimated low as high pressure
and temperature are involved.
Beneficial is the one-step
process. Energy use is stated as
comparable to conventional
solvent-solid extraction [78]
Techniques available,
solely based on product
properties.
For scalable
production, large
pressure tanks are
required.
The current
setup only
shows
recrystallisation
in expansion
vessel.
2
Sources [74], [75], [77], [79]–[84]
19
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 6 Supercritical Drying
Introduction
To remove liquid from a suspension super criticality can be used.
Super criticality means that the substance temperature and pressure
are brought above the critical point. In this state the distinction
between gas and liquid disappears, the density of the liquid and gas
phase becomes equal. Super criticality is advantageous because it has
a lower viscosity and diffusivity than liquid. The literature describes
two methods using super criticality: supercritical drying and
supercritical extraction.
Application to papermaking
Supercritical (carbon dioxide) drying is a relatively new process to remove liquids (e.g. water) from solid (porous)
materials. Water can also be used in supercritical drying however it has a high critical point requiring high pressure and
temperature (22MPa, 647K [82]). To reduce energy use in aqueous drying the water can be washed out with ethanol
or acetone which is subsequently removed by CO2 under high pressure [82], [85]. Four supercritical drying methods
could be applied for water removal in the papermaking process [86], [87]:
• Supercritical gas drying (SCGD) uses liquid CO2 to replace the water after which it is raised to supercritical level.
• Supercritical organic solvent drying (SCOD) where the organic solvent with CO2 is raised to a supercritical state.
• Supercritical mixture solvent drying (SCMD) in which solvent is mixed with CO2 (g) and raised to the
supercritical state of the mixture.
• Spray drying with the assistance of supercritical gas (SASD) is a combination of the supercritical state and spray
drying wherein the substance is sprayed in a chamber and dried.
Potential partners
• Waters
• Suflux
• CO2dry / Feyecon
Figure 8 Schematic of a supercritical CO2 drying system © Zhenzong et al. [85]
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
20
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Sources [85], [86], [88]–[100]
Method
High-
speed
process
Low CO2
emissions
from process
Cost-effective Safety Energy
reduction
High
paper
strength
Closed
/ open
system TRL
Supercritical -
• gas drying
(SCGD)
• organic solvent
drying (SCOD)
• mixture solvent
drying (SCMD)
• spray method
supercritical
drying (SASD)
Depending
on
technique
drying
times can
be long or
short.
CO2 can be
reused, although
some amount is
lost during
depressurisation.
Is a standard
dehydration
technique, applied in
many industries.
However, operation
and equipment costs
are high. CO2 dry
claims up to 30%
lower investment
costs. Scalability
required.
Working
under
high
pressure
may
oppose
risks in
production
CO2 drying
energy depends
on operating
temperature and
pressure
required. CO2Dry
claims up to 50%
energy reduction
(compared to
freeze-drying)
Nanopaper
is three
times
stronger
than
normal.
Structure
remains
intact
Closed
2 - 3 for
paper
6+ for
food
Figure 9 Schematic visualization of supercritical drying techniques © Zheng et al. [86]
21
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 7 Electro Dewatering
Introduction
Electrical assisted mechanical dewatering, known
as electro-dewatering, is considered as one of the
most effective hybrid processes for the
improvement of wastewater sludge dewatering
efficiency. The operating conditions of the electric
field and pressure used in the electrically assisted
mechanical dewatering are sufficient to remove a
significant proportion of the water that cannot be
removed using mechanical dewatering
technologies alone. Thus electro-dewatering has
the potential to be viable for a range of slurries, which either could not be sufficiently dewatered or would otherwise
require extreme conditions using conventional dewatering devices. [101]–[104]. Some research showed the occurrence
of electrolysis when applying sufficient high electrical fields. Electrolysis of water can be of interest as it produces H2
and O2. However, electrolysis is a high energy consuming process. With 100% theoretical efficiency it requires 13,2
GJ/t of water. This is, in comparison with the energy consumption during the current drying section (3,6 – 6,2 GJ/t of
water [105]) 2 to 3,5 times higher. The current industrial state of the art show 70% electrolysis efficiency. The maximum
theoretical efficiency of a fuel cell is 83%. Calculating with these numbers (18,9 GJ input and 11,0 GJ recovery per ton
of electrolysed water) the net energy consumption will be 7,9 GJ/t of water. Electrolysis will therefore not yield a profit
in terms of energy use. However, it can be an interesting option from an economic point of view.
Application to papermaking
Electro dewatering has the potential to assist in the press section of the current paper production process. Research on
the efficiency of the technique is mainly done in the field of wastewater sludge dewatering. It has been shown that
electro dewatering can be used to remove a significant proportion of the inherent water from conditioned activated
wastewater sludge. It can remove from 10 to 24% of additional water, which cannot be accessed by the conventional
mechanical dewatering process alone. The energy used to reach the additional dryness is significantly lower (10–25%
lower) than that required for thermal drying techniques [102]. Research on the dewatering of cellulosic pulp and paper
waste sludge shows a long dewatering time to get moisture content (55%) similar to the one obtained in the factory
by mechanical methods. However, this comparison is difficult and non-concluding because of the difference of the
applied mechanical compression forces. Advantage seems to be that the cake is better prepared to be hot air dried
[105].
Figure 10: Mechanical dewatering and electro-dewatering with the different mechanisms © Mahmoud et al. [1]
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
22
Breakthrough technology roadmap
As no research is found on the effect of electro dewatering in paper production, the ability to predict possible
enhancements is limited. As seen in the waste sludge experiments the process speed will be a challenge to keep up
with the current paper production speed.
Potential partners
• Energos
• Bluewin
• The Laboratory of Thermal, Energetic and Processes, University of Pau, France
Requirements table
Technique Potential Energy
Reduction Substantial Water
Removal Speed of Process Water Reusability
Electro Dewatering
10 – 25% of additional dryness compared with
thermal drying technique
10 – 24% additional water than mechanical
dewatering
20 – 250 minutes contact time for waste
sludge
Same as current mechanical press
process
Sources [101]–[106]
23
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 8 Ultrasonic Dewatering
Introduction
Ultrasound is sound waves (ultrasonic waves) with frequencies higher
than the upper audible limit of human hearing (from 20 kHz up to
several gigahertz). It is no different from 'normal' (audible) sound in
its physical properties. The applications of ultrasonic waves are
divided into two groups: low and high intensity. Low-intensity
ultrasonic waves are those wherein the objective is to obtain
information about the propagation medium without producing any
modification in its state. On the contrary, high-intensity applications
are those wherein the ultrasonic energy is used to create permanent
changes in the treated medium [107]. High-intensity ultrasound is suitable for dewatering and drying of moisture
containing solids (ultrasonic dewatering) without the introduction of heat. Studies to ultrasonic dewatering are mainly
in the field of food processing, and more recently some research is done in the field of fabric drying.
Application to papermaking
Ultrasonic dewatering can be of interest in reducing the moisture content of paper before entering the drying section
or to replace the drying section completely. Two different ultrasonic dewatering techniques are identified.
Ultrasonic Assisted convective (hot air) drying resulting in an acceleration of heat and mass transfer and reduction
of the drying time without a significant increase in product temperature [108]. The drying time for the convective drying
of clipfish can be reduced by 43% with the application of airborne ultrasound at an intensity 25 W kg−1. The change in
the drying rate is more significant at the beginning of the drying process than at the end [109]. However, one of the
main difficulties in the application of ultrasonically assisted drying is to achieve efficient generation and transmission of
ultrasonic energy from the transducers to the product while ensuring easy adaptability to conventional drying processes
[107], [110].
Direct Contact Ultrasonic drying involves placing the ultrasonic transducer in direct contact with the material. A high-
frequency vibration atomises water turning it into a cold mist [111]. The good acoustic impedance matching between
the vibrating plate of the transducer and the material favours the deep penetration of acoustic energy and increases
the effectiveness of the process [107]. A demonstration unit was fabricated to show the efficacy of the process and its
energy saving compared to the thermal drying process. The preliminary results showed that the energy consumption
of the direct contact ultrasonic press drier which was made of the metal mesh-based transducer was five times less
than the latent heat of evaporation at water contents greater than 20% [112].
Figure11 Ultrasonic Drying © ORNL
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
24
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Potential partners
• Herrmann Ultrasonics + Video
• Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
Requirements table
Technique Potential Energy
Reduction Scalability
Paper Quality
Affection Continuous Process
Ultrasonic Assisted 30%
Challenge to achieve
efficient transmission of the
ultrasound on large scale
Not tested on paper Yes
Direct Contact
Ultrasonic Up to 80%
No restriction on the
ultrasonic surface Not tested on paper Yes
Sources [107]–[113]
25
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 9 Osmotic Dewatering
Introduction
Osmosis is the movement of a solvent through a semi-permeable
membrane into a region with a solution of higher osmotic value (e.g.
higher dissolved salt concentration), in the direction to equalise the
solute concentration (osmotic value) of the two sides. Osmosis may
thus be used for separation of water from a solid/water mixture. The
process results in a concentration of the feed stream and dilution of
the highly concentrated stream (referred to as the draw solution).
Application to papermaking
Forward osmosis is an engineering process utilising natural osmosis whereby the water from the feed stream passes
through a semi-permeable membrane which has the advantages of low energy requirements. The method can
potentially be used to assist in the press section of the current paper production process to reduce the moist amount
before entering the drying section. Research on this technique focusses on wastewater sludge dewatering, water
treatment and food processing. As the process will dilute the draw solution and reduce its osmotic value, Reverse
osmosis can be used to restore the needed osmotic value. Reverse osmosis uses pressure to force the water through a
semi-permeable membrane from an area of high osmotic value to an area of low osmotic value. Research in the field
of sludge dewatering has shown a solids level of 70-80% with a process speed of 8 L/h per m2 of membrane surface
[114].
As no research focuses on the effect of forwarding osmosis in paper production, the ability to predict possible
enhancements is limited. As seen in the waste sludge experiments the process speed will be a challenge to keep up
with the current paper production speed.
Potential partners
• HTI Water
• CSIRO
Figure 12: Forward osmosis vs Reverse osmosis
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
26
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Technique Potential Energy
Reduction Substantial Water
Removal Speed of Process Water Reusability
Forward osmosis N/A 70-80% solids level with sludge waste
Slow. Up to 15 L/h per m2 of
membrane surface
Water reusable with the use of reverse
osmosis
Sources [114]–[118]
27
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 10 Microwave Drying
Introduction
Microwaves heat up materials by dielectric heating. The dipole moment
of water enables molecular friction when radiated with microwaves.
Therefore, products heat up homogenously and efficiently, especially
when consisting of water. The advantages of microwave heating are
efficient heating of materials in a very short timeframe (up to 10 times
faster than convection heating) and requiring little space (10% of floor
space [119]).
Application to papermaking
Microwave drying is explored in many fields, and therefore a lot of different set-ups exist. Four categories have been
distinguished that could be applied: Continuous microwave dryer (belt technology), Microwave vacuum based
dehydration, Microwave-osmotic dehydration and microwave-assisted hot air drying.
1. Continuous microwave dryer (belt technology) is a drying technique where multiple microwave generators are
placed perpendicular to a drying belt. The technique is used to dry materials like wood, board and ceramics
[120].
2. In microwave vacuum (MWV) based dehydration microwave technology is combined with a vacuum system. In
vacuum, water vaporises at much lower temperatures with better heat distribution. Energy consumption is
estimated 2.98-7.7 MJ/kg while 4.45-6.50MJ/kg is the estimation of conventional air-drying energy use [121].
3. Microwave-osmotic dehydration (MWOD) uses osmotic dehydration to increase moisture loss speed of,
especially fruit products. The moisture loss compared to other techniques was 30 to 94% faster [122].
4. Microwave-assisted hot air drying (MWHA) is a combination of hot air ventilation and microwave power [123].
The general challenge with the microwave technique for drying is defining the optimal values for parameters like
frequency (Hz), power (W) and assistive drying techniques (hot-air, vacuum, osmotic, freeze).
Potential partners
• Romill
• Pueschner
• Process technologies
Figure 13 An industrial scale belt microwave dryer © Thermex Thermatron
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
28
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Scalability Paper quality Attainabil
ity Continuo
us Energy reduction
potential TRL
Microwave: Microwave belt drier, Continuous microwave dryer, Microwave-Osmotic Dehydration, Microwave-Vacuum-Based Dehydration, Microwave-assisted hot air drying
Yes, is industrially applied in many
industries and uses less than 10% of convection drying
floor space. However, the optimal
characteristics for large-scale paper
application need to be developed.
All properties were found to
be either enhanced or at the same level.
Microwaves enhance bonding strength
between fibres [124].
Needs to be tailored
and experiment
ed with microwave suppliers
Yes, using a belt drying system
Microwave drying is regarded as an efficient
technology. Heat is generated principally in
the product and a significant time
reduction can be achieved. In research
has been estimated that microwave technology
can achieve 20% energy reduction.
6+
Sources [119]–[123], [125]–[135]
29
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 11 Hygroscopic drying
Introduction
Hygroscopic materials are materials that extract moisture from their
surroundings. The effect can be viewed as a similar process to osmotic
extraction; the moisture is directed to the regions with high adsorption
potential until the vapour pressure inside the hygroscopic
material/desiccant is in equilibrium with the outside air. Hygroscopic
materials function at room temperatures making them ideal for in-house
dehumidifiers [136]. Materials that are known for their hygroscopic
behaviour are cellulose, salts, silica gels, activated carbon, borax, alum
and zeolites [137]. The primary downside for desiccants is their slow
adsorption speed (hours) [138], [139].
Application to papermaking
Desiccants adsorb moisture from air based on the difference in vapour pressure. Therefore, to apply desiccants in
papermaking, water needs to be turned into moisture enabling a vapour pressure difference. To facilitate the moisture
extraction water could be moisturised using a continuous dry air flow. This air flow can be combined with a desiccant
wheel system [140]. The desiccant wheel is a
circular system where dry air can be used to
moisturise water from, for example, paper
that subsequently is dehumidified by the
desiccant in the rotary wheel. When the
desiccant is saturated, it can be dehumidified
itself by a stream of heated air or using
microwave technology [141].
Potential partners
• Atlas Copco
• Hoval
• Novatec
Figure 15 Schematic visualization of desiccant setup. © Zhang et al. [144]
Figure 146 Picture of solid silica gel desiccant © Tradekorea.com
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
30
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Sustainable
energy reduction
Doesn’t affect quality of paper
Scalability Cost-
effective “Easy” water absorption
Re-usability of the crystal
TRL
Desiccant drying
A significant energy
consumption reduction can be achieved
when combined with fluidised bed
and solar
The technique is applied to dry
delicate and heat sensitive structures as flowers and as a means to conserve
product characteristics. It is therefore assumed that the quality of
paper is not
affected
The technology is not applied in a belt-like continuous structure. It is a time-consuming
batch process
Is a low-cost drying
method
Desiccants are applied as
dehumidifiers and do not have a rapid adsorptive power of water in the liquid state. Therefore first water should be moisturised to
be adsorbed.
The desiccant was reused
over five times without loss of functionality. The desiccant
can be regenerated
using a stream of hot air that extracts the
moisture
1-2 (for
paper)
Sources [69], [136], [138]–[140], [142]–[146]
31
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 12 Superheated Steam
Introduction
Superheated steam is steam at a higher temperature
than its vaporisation point with the corresponding
pressure and is generated by heating the saturated
steam obtained by boiling water. Drying with
superheated steam have some advantages over
conventional convective drying; Lower energy use
due to the possibility of reusing the latent heat of
evaporation, higher heat transfer coefficient that
leads to a reduction in drying time and the potential
of new product quality specifications [147], [148].
Application to papermaking
Superheated steam drying is not a new concept in paper drying and is an alternative to replace the current drying
section.
Superheated Steam Impingement Drying is one of the possible future designs for the paper industry. This
technique is in development and advantages are expected in energy savings, reduction in equipment size and paper
quality properties [149]. Research on paper quality dried with superheated steam reports an increase in strength,
toughness and tensile index [150]. The lower temperature of superheated steam caused by the vaporisation of water
during the drying process will not result in condensation, as the temperature is higher than the saturation temperature
and stays in superheated condition. The excess steam can be recovered with the use of mechanical compression of
vapour [147]. Suggestions are made to combine superheated steam drying with a supplementary heat source (e.g.
microwave) to speed up the drying rate [151].
Potential partners
• Fraunhofer
• CDS
Figure 16 Superheated steam drying at atmospheric pressure © Fraunhofer
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
32
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Technique Potential Energy
Reduction Steam regeneration Scalability Pressure
Superheated steam impingement drying
Up to 50% Mechanical vapour
recompression Tests in pilot
scale Process at atmospheric
pressure
Sources [147]–[152]
33
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Case 13 FOAM FORMING
Introduction
The role of water is undisputable in the papermaking process. Water
is used as a swelling agent; it increases the contact area between
fibres, it is used a solvent for additives, it is the suspending and
dispersing medium, and it facilitates the creation of hydrogen bonds
[71]. Therefore, completely removing water from the papermaking
process requires technology that needs to replace all the functions of
water. Instead of completely removing water from the process there
might also be solutions that enable web-forming using a reduced
amount of water. The benefit of such a technique would be that water
can still be used to enable hydrogen bonding and as a swelling agent, while less drying energy is required. Techniques
that facilitate such a forming system are foam forming and the use of strength additives like zwitterions that increase
the coulombic interaction between the fibres.
Application to papermaking
Foam forming is a technique developed by VTT that uses microbubbles to create a very dense foam. The foam can be
laid on an adapted papermaking machine. As air is combined with water, less water is required to suspend pulp while
maintaining the creation of paper-like materials. Expected savings will be up to 30% in drying energy and overall 20%
in energy reduction while using less raw materials [153].
Zwitterions are not a forming technique but rather an additive that can be used to increase the paper strength.
Zwitterions increase the coulombic interaction between the fibres. The coulombic interaction in paper strength has been
researched extensively as the primary bond for paper strength. Zwitterions could be added to the mixture when paper
is formed with low water content (using steam formation) after a waterless laying technique [73], [154].
Potential partners
• VTT
• Valmet
Figure 17 Pilot plant of VTT's foam forming system © VTT
Energy reduction potential Technology Readiness Level
34
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Requirements table
Concept Speed of
process
Cost-
effectiveness
Energy
reduction Scalability Emission reduction TRL
Foam forming 1000m/min 60-85% of
current cost 20% Yes
Up to 30% reduction
in drying energy 6 (pilot stage)
Sources [153], [155]–[157]
35
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Appendix I: Complete technology list
1. Air-laying: A technique very common in papermaking for paper products like napkins and tissues. In contrast
to the “wet” papermaking process, in air-laid production of paper air is used as the medium to create the
nonwoven. Challenges will be in creating paper with similar strength and characteristics as normal paper. [158]
[159] [6]
2. Carding: A technique to create non-woven sheets with mechanical force. Fibers are mechanically placed in
interlocking positions with needle-like structures. Likewise to air-laying, the challenge will be to use binders that
strengthen the paper. [158] [159] [160] [161]
3. Centrifugal Force spinning: A technique that use a centrifugal force to position the fibers in a web that are
extruded or sprayed at the center of the centrifuge. The technology is primarily used for specialist nonwovens
like membranes. Not yet commercially applied. [162]
4. Cross-linking additives: This technique can be applied to reduce the amount of water required as additional
ingredient to papermaking techniques. The cross-linkers can be added to increase paper strength and entangle
the web structure. [163] [158] [164] [165] [166]
5. Electrospinning: This technique uses electric force to create charged fibers from a polymer melt or a polymer
solution. The fibers can be sprayed to create a nonwoven mesh that can be interconnected. The challenge will
be to dissolve kraft pulp in a sustainable process to create cellulose fibers. [167] [168] [169] [170]
6. Gel-spinning: This technique comprises a gel that is pressed through a nozzle (spuitmond) to create fibers.
The raw material needs to be fed in a gel. The challenge will be to create a raw material that can be used by a
gel-spinning system. [52]
7. Spunbonding I/S: Spunbonding is a process similar to the gel spinning process where the raw material is fed
as a polymer solution or a polymer melt that is pressed through a set of nozzles to create a nonwoven web.
The technique is already commercially applied in the creation of polymer nonwovens. [171] [158]
8. Melt/solution blowing: The melt/solution blowing technique forces the creation of fibers accompanied by air
onto a carrier. Due to the spray-like flow a fiber web is created on the carrier. Similar to other melt spinning
techniques the challenge will be to dissolve the kraft pulp in order to create the web. [158] [172]
9. Needlepunching: Like carding needle punching uses a somewhat similar strategy. Needles are used to
entangle the fibers to form a web. Unlike carding the fibers are not rolled but pressed with needles perpendicular
to the web. Although this is a very old technology the application to paper will depend on the ability to handle
smaller size fibers. [158] [173]
10. Sonication to entangle fiber network: Sonication is a technique that use “waves” to disorder the state of
materials. The technique can be used to fibrillate the fibers. [174]
11. EPSON Paperlab: The Epson paper lab is an example of a complete “dry” paper recycling technique. It uses
waste office paper as input and creates a reusable sheet of paper as output. It goes through the stages of
fiberizing-binding-forming without additional water use. A binder is introduced in the binding stage to bond the
paper.
12. Alcohols (Methanol, Ethanol, N-propanol, N-butanol): Replacing water with alcohol as solvents.
Challenge will be to overcome the lower dipole moment of the alcohols. Tear strength and breaking length are
substantially lower for alcohols. [72]
36
Breakthrough technology roadmap
13. Supercritical and near-critical fluids: Not directly introduced as a solvent to replace water. However, the
use or supercritical and near critical fluids are claimed to have high success rates in enabling production
processes and reaction. Besides, they are sustainable alternatives. [175]
14. Ionic liquids: Ionic liquids are fluid salts that are used as a medium to increase reactions and change the
characteristics of the materials dissolved in the liquids. They can dissolve cellulose (and kraft pulp) enabling
new applications in web formation. This is discussed in the results of case 1. Challenge will be the regeneration
of the solvent and application in bulk. [176]
15. SO2-ethanol-water (cellulose dissolving): Similar to the role ionic liquids have. However, a safer and less
toxic solvent than acid sulfate that is currently used for dissolving cellulose in the Lyocell (rayon) process. [177]
16. Spray coating (airbrushing, e.g.): Spray coating is a technique where a solution or melt is forced through
a nozzle to create a homogeneous spray. The coating technique can be used to replace the relatively wet size
press process. [178] [179] [180]
17. Brushing: Is the technique where a brush is applied to spread a viscous fluid on a surface. [180]
18. Casting: Casting can be applied in two ways. The first is by casting the film or coating on the surface itself.
The second is to pre-cast the coating in a mold and then apply it on the surface. This results in a two-component
system. [181] [182] [183]
19. Centrifugal powder coating: In this technique, centrifugal force is applied to spray a powdered coating on
a surface. The challenge will be to adopt the centrifugal system in the current paper process. [184]
20. Coating materials, as a replacement for starch: This is not a technique but merely a water-use mitigation
option by enabling other (bio-based) materials as a replacement for starch that has similar characteristics but
less water use (higher solid content). Materials from the food and medicine industry are introduced. [185]
21. Electrostatic coating: This is a technique that create a spray that adds a charge to the coat. If the to be
coated surface is charged as well with an opposite charge the coat and surface attract each other. The challenge
will be to apply this in the papermaking process and the negative effects of electrostatic forces that may occur.
[186] [187] [179]
22. Hot-melt coating: Coatings (like waxes) can be applied as a hot melt to mitigate the use of solvent and
therefore the drying process. [184]
23. Increase solid content: An approach to reduce the water content in the coat and thereby to reduce the
amount of water required. [188] [189]
24. Knife coating technique: This technique is somewhat similar to the size-press technique. However, the knife
coating technique allows to dose the amount of coat applied. Also, it allows application of more viscous fluids.
[190]
25. Bar coating: This technique uses a metering rod that “scrapes” excess coating of the surface. Changing the
diameter of the wire tunes the quantity of the applied coating. [191]
26. Crosslinkers: Cross linkers can be applied to the mixture of the paper to strengthen the paper internally and
can be added to the starch coating. [192]
27. Dry lamination: A technique that applies a “dry” second layer on the substrate. [193]
28. Dry powder coating (e.g., mechanofusion): A coating that is applied as a dry substance by force (air or
press) [194] [195]
29. Extrusion lamination/coating: Similar to dry lamination, although the coating is applied as a hot melt and
extruded in the process. [193] [196]
37
Breakthrough technology roadmap
30. Hot-melt laminating (e.g., compress): This technique shows similarities to dry lamination, a second roll
with the laminate is combined with the substrate roll. When combined, heat is applied to bond the laminate
with the substrate. [191] [193]
31. Photocurable coating (UV, cross-linking): This coating is cured using a light source like UV. [197] [198]
[199] [200]
32. Plasma pre-treatment and flash evaporation treatment: This technique uses a two-component system.
A plasma pre-treatment is required to change the surface characteristics. The flash evaporation treatment
applies a thick coating. The challenge will be to apply the batch-process in the continuous papermaking process.
[201]
33. Water-based self-drying, fast curing coating: An additive added to the coating suspension allows quick
drying at room temperature in 1-3 hrs. [202]
34. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD): A batch coating technique in a vacuum that allows depositing high-
quality coats. This technology is state of the art. The challenge will be to implement the technique in the
continuous, high speed, papermaking process. Systems are the developed towards continuous CVD. [203]
35. Electrostatic dry powder coating: : This is a technique that create a spray that adds a charge to the coat.
If the to be coated surface is charged as well with an opposite charge the coat and surface attract each other.
The challenge will be to apply this in the papermaking process and the negative effects of electrostatic forces
that may occur. [204]
36. Heat Exchanger - Is a device that transfers the heat from the exhaust air to the fresh inlet air. The air streams
are separated by a solid wall. Where are lots of different designs but the principle is the same. [205]
37. Membrane Heat Exchanger - The principle of this device is the same as a normal heat exchanger. The
exhaust air and the inlet air are separated by a semi-permeable membrane, which will recover the exhaust air
moisture into the inlet air. [206] [207]
38. Heat Exchanger with Heat Pump - The principle of this device is the same as a normal heat exchanger.
The separated heat pump will compress pre-warmed gasses into a hot liquid which will extra heat the inlet air.
[208]
39. Mechanical Vapor Recompression - Is a device that recompressed the exhaust air. It involves taking vapor
(usually water vapor) at, or a little above, atmospheric pressure and adding energy to it by compression. The
result is a smaller volume of vapor, at a higher temperature and pressure, which can be used to do useful work.
[209]
40. Heat recovery steam generator - An energy heat exchanger that recovers heat from a hot gas stream. It
produces steam that can be reused in the process. [210]
41. Self-heat Recuperation - Is a technology that facilitates recirculation of not only latent heat but also sensible
heat in a process, and helps to reduce the energy consumption of the process by using compressors and self-
heat exchangers based on exergy recuperation. [211] [212] [213]
42. Infrared Drying - A technique that use the infrared spectrum of light to heat objects. [214] [215]
43. Microwave Drying - A technique that use electromagnetic radiation with high frequencies to create friction of
the water molecules. [216] [108]
44. Ultrasonic Drying - A technique that basically works like a humidifier. An ultrasonic humidifier uses a ceramic
diaphragm (piezoelectric transducer) vibrating at an ultrasonic frequency to create water droplets. [217] [113]
[218]
38
Breakthrough technology roadmap
45. Osmotic Dewatering - A technique that is based on the principle of osmosis. Osmosis is the spontaneous
movement of solvent molecules (through a semi-permeable membrane) into a region of higher solute
concentration, in the direction that tends to equalize the solute concentrations on the two sides. [219]
46. Electro Dewatering - A technology in which a conventional dewatering mechanism such a pressure
dewatering is combined with electro kinetic effects to realize an improved liquid/solids separation. [104] [220]
[221]
47. Heated Press Section - Preheating the paper (and water) before the press section will lead to increased
dewatering efficiency. [222]
48. Freeze Drying - A technique that works by freezing the material and then reducing the surrounding pressure
to allow the frozen water in the material to sublime directly from the solid phase to the gas phase. [223]
49. Belt Press Dewatering (Vacuum & Mechanical) - Is an industrial machine, used for solid/liquid separation
processes. The process of filtration is primarily obtained by passing a pair of filtering cloths and belts through
a system of rollers. [224] [225]
50. Superheated Steam Drying - The superheated steam acts both as heat source and as drying medium to
take away the evaporated water. [149]
39
Breakthrough technology roadmap
Bibliography
[1] L. Kong, A. Hasanbeigi, and L. Price, “Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and
paper industry: a technical review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 122, pp. 5–28, May 2016.
[2] P. Bajpai, Pulp and Paper Industry: Energy Conservation. Elsevier, 2016.
[3] A. Kononov, V. Drobosyuk, and H. Paulapuro, “Application of the Air Dynamic Forming method for coarse
mechanical pulp,” in 58th Appita Annual Conference and Exhibition Incorporating the Pan Pacific Conference: Canberra, Australia 19-21 April 2004 Proceedings, 2004, p. 97.
[4] A. KONONOV and H. PAULAPURO, “Air Dynamic Forming as an alternative for conventional papermaking,” Pap. ja puu, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 243–249, 2004.
[5] S. Alimuzzaman, R. H. Gong, and M. Akonda, “Biodegradability of nonwoven flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid
biocomposites,” Polym. Compos., vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2094–2102, 2014.
[6] R. H. Gong and A. Nikoukhesal, “Hydro‐ entangled bi‐ component microfiber nonwovens,” Polym. Eng. Sci., vol.
49, no. 9, pp. 1703–1707, 2009.
[7] S. Alimuzzaman, R. H. Gong, and M. Akonda, “Nonwoven polylactic acid and flax biocomposites,” Polym. Compos., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1611–1619, 2013.
[8] H. Hargitai, I. Rácz, and R. D. Anandjiwala, “Development of hemp fiber reinforced polypropylene composites,”
J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 2008.
[9] A. Dufresne, Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co
KG, 2017.
[10] G. Jiang, S. Zhang, and X. Qin, “High throughput of quality nanofibers via one stepped pyramid-shaped
spinneret,” Mater. Lett., vol. 106, pp. 56–58, Sep. 2013.
[11] F. Hermanutz, F. Gähr, E. Uerdingen, F. Meister, and B. Kosan, “New developments in dissolving and
processing of cellulose in ionic liquids,” in Macromolecular symposia, 2008, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 23–27.
[12] A. Kolbasov et al., “Industrial-scale solution blowing of soy protein nanofibers,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 55,
no. 1, pp. 323–333, 2015.
[13] H. Sixta et al., “Ioncell-F: a high-strength regenerated cellulose fibre,” Nord Pulp Pap Res J, vol. 30, pp. 43–57,
2015.
[14] A. Parviainen et al., “Sustainability of cellulose dissolution and regeneration in 1, 5-diazabicyclo [4.3. 0] non-5-
enium acetate: a batch simulation of the IONCELL-F process,” RSC Adv., vol. 5, no. 85, pp. 69728–69737,
2015.
[15] S. Yadav, M. P. Illa, T. Rastogi, and C. S. Sharma, “High absorbency cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers
for feminine hygiene application,” Appl. Mater. Today, vol. 4, pp. 62–70, 2016.
[16] O. Naboka et al., “Carbon nanofibers synthesized from electrospun cellulose for advanced material
applications,” in Materials Science Forum, 2013, vol. 730, pp. 903–908.
[17] A. Sutka, J. Gravitis, S. Kukle, A. Sutka, and M. Timusk, “Electrospinning of poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofiber mats
reinforced by lignocellulose nanowhiskers,” Soft Mater., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2015.
[18] B. Ding, E. Kimura, T. Sato, S. Fujita, and S. Shiratori, “Fabrication of blend biodegradable nanofibrous
nonwoven mats via multi-jet electrospinning,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1895–1902, 2004.
[19] R. Dashtbani and E. Afra, “Producing Cellulose nanofiber from Cotton wastes by electrospinning method,” Int. J. Nano Dimens., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2015.
[20] W. K. Son, J. H. Youk, and W. H. Park, “Preparation of ultrafine oxidized cellulose mats via electrospinning,”
Biomacromolecules, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 197–201, 2004.
40
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[21] W. Tomaszewski, M. Kudra, and M. Szadkowski, “Cellulose microfibres electrospun and melt-blown from NNMO
solutions,” Fibres Text. East. Eur., 2012.
[22] E.-H. Lee, H.-M. Kim, S.-K. Lim, K.-S. Kim, and I.-J. Chin, “Electro-active polymer actuator based on aligned
cellulose nanofibrous membrane,” Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., vol. 499, no. 1, pp. 259–581, 2009.
[23] H. Sehaqui, S. Morimune, T. Nishino, and L. A. Berglund, “Stretchable and strong cellulose nanopaper structures based on polymer-coated nanofiber networks: an alternative to nonwoven porous membranes from
electrospinning,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3661–3667, 2012.
[24] I. Esmaeilzadeh, V. Mottaghitalab, B. Tousifar, A. Afzali, and M. Lamani, “A feasibility study on semi industrial
nozzleless electrospinning of cellulose nanofiber,” Int. J. Ind. Chem., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 193–211, 2015.
[25] Y. Ma, M. Hummel, M. Määttänen, A. Särkilahti, A. Harlin, and H. Sixta, “Upcycling of waste paper and
cardboard to textiles,” Green Chem., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 858–866, 2016.
[26] H.-P. Fink, P. Weigel, H. J. Purz, and J. Ganster, “Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from
NMMO-solutions,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1473–1524, 2001.
[27] Y. S. Vinogradova and J. Y. Chen, “Micron-and nano-cellulose fiber regenerated from ionic liquids,” J. Text. Inst., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 472–476, 2016.
[28] J. Song, F. Lu, B. Cheng, X. Hu, and C. Ma, “Melt blowing of ionic liquid-based cellulose solutions,” Fibers Polym., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 291–296, 2014.
[29] X. Zhuang, X. Yang, L. Shi, B. Cheng, K. Guan, and W. Kang, “Solution blowing of submicron-scale cellulose
fibers,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 982–987, 2012.
[30] S. L. P. Tang, S. J. Law, and S. K. Mukhopadhyay, Melt-blowing of amine-oxide-based lyocell solutions: A preliminary investigation, vol. 92. 2001.
[31] J. Cai, L. Zhang, J. Zhou, H. Li, H. Chen, and H. Jin, “Novel fibers prepared from cellulose in NaOH/urea
aqueous solution,” Macromol. Rapid Commun., vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 1558–1562, 2004.
[32] M. Abe, Y. Fukaya, and H. Ohno, “Fast and facile dissolution of cellulose with tetrabutylphosphonium hydroxide
containing 40 wt% water,” Chem. Commun., vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1808–1810, 2012.
[33] M. G. Freire, A. R. R. Teles, R. A. S. Ferreira, L. D. Carlos, J. A. Lopes-da-Silva, and J. A. P. Coutinho,
“Electrospun nanosized cellulose fibers using ionic liquids at room temperature,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 11,
pp. 3173–3180, 2011.
[34] P. Kulpinski, “Cellulose nanofibers prepared by the N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide method,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1855–1859, Nov. 2005.
[35] C. Woodings, Regenerated cellulose fibres, vol. 18. Woodhead Publishing, 2001.
[36] J. G. Lynam, N. Kumar, and M. J. Wong, “Deep eutectic solvents’ ability to solubilize lignin, cellulose, and
hemicellulose; thermal stability; and density,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 238, pp. 684–689, 2017.
[37] C. Mukesh, D. Mondal, M. Sharma, and K. Prasad, “Choline chloride–thiourea, a deep eutectic solvent for the
production of chitin nanofibers,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 103, pp. 466–471, 2014.
[38] F. Mano et al., “Production of poly (vinyl alcohol)(pva) fibers with encapsulated natural deep eutectic solvent
(nades) using electrospinning,” ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2504–2509, 2015.
[39] Z. Jiang et al., “Dissolution and Metastable Solution of Cellulose in NaOH/Thiourea at 8 C for Construction of
Nanofibers,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 121, no. 8, pp. 1793–1801, 2017.
[40] S. Zhang, F.-X. Li, J.-Y. Yu, and G. Li-Xia, “Dissolved state and viscosity properties of cellulose in a NaOH
complex solvent,” Cellul. Chem. Technol., vol. 43, no. 7, p. 241, 2009.
[41] M. Kihlman, B. F. Medronho, A. L. Romano, U. GermgÅrd, and B. Lindman, “Cellulose dissolution in an alkali
based solvent: influence of additives and pretreatments,” J. Braz. Chem. Soc., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 295–303,
2013.
41
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[42] S.-L. Quan, S.-G. Kang, and I.-J. Chin, “Characterization of cellulose fibers electrospun using ionic liquid,”
Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 2010.
[43] T. Kanbayashi and H. Miyafuji, “Raman microscopic study of Japanese beech (Fagus crenata) as treated with
the ionic liquid, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride,” J. Wood Chem. Technol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 224–234,
2016.
[44] B. Mostofian, J. C. Smith, and X. Cheng, “Simulation of a cellulose fiber in ionic liquid suggests a synergistic
approach to dissolution,” Cellulose, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 983–997, 2014.
[45] M. Mazza, D.-A. Catana, C. Vaca-Garcia, and C. Cecutti, “Influence of water on the dissolution of cellulose in
selected ionic liquids,” Cellulose, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2009.
[46] S. Righi, A. Morfino, P. Galletti, C. Samorì, A. Tugnoli, and C. Stramigioli, “Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle
assessments of cellulose dissolution with 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride and N-methyl-morpholine-N-
oxide,” Green Chem., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 367–375, 2011.
[47] S. Duri, B. El-Zahab, and C. D. Tran, “Polysaccharide ecocomposite materials: Synthesis, characterization and
application for removal of pollutants and bacteria,” ECS Trans., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 573–594, 2013.
[48] A. Lu and L. ZHANG, Advance in solvents of cellulose, vol. 7. 2009.
[49] D. Ingildeev, F. Effenberger, K. Bredereck, and F. Hermanutz, “Comparison of direct solvents for regenerated cellulosic fibers via the lyocell process and by means of ionic liquids,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 128, no. 6, pp.
4141–4150, 2013.
[50] N. Reddy and Y. Yang, “The N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) process of producing regenerated fibers,” in
Innovative Biofibers from Renewable Resources, Springer, 2015, pp. 65–71.
[51] T. Xu, J. W. Slaa, and J. Sathaye, “Characterizing costs, savings and benefits of a selection of energy efficient emerging technologies in the United States,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley,
CA (US), 2010.
[52] D. Li, Y. Ye, D. Li, X. Li, and C. Mu, “Biological properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked
gelatin–PEG composite hydrogel fibers for wound dressings,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 137, pp. 508–514, 2016.
[53] A. Tejado, M. Antal, X. Liu, and T. G. M. van de Ven, “Wet cross-linking of cellulose fibers via a bioconjugation
reaction,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 5907–5913, 2011.
[54] A. Tejado, A. Miro, and G. M. T. van de Ven, “Effect of EDC ADH fibre crosslinking on the wet-web strength of
BHKP with and without PCC loading,” J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Process., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2011.
[55] N. Aarne, A.-H. Vesterinen, E. Kontturi, J. Seppälä, and J. Laine, “A systematic study of noncross-linking wet
strength agents,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 52, no. 34, pp. 12010–12017, 2013.
[56] A. Naderi, T. Lindström, J. Sundström, T. Pettersson, G. Flodberg, and J. Erlandsson, “Microfluidized carboxymethyl cellulose modified pulp: a nanofibrillated cellulose system with some attractive properties,”
Cellulose, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1159–1173, 2015.
[57] L. Gärdlund, L. Wågberg, and R. Gernandt, “Polyelectrolyte complexes for surface modification of wood fibres: II. Influence of complexes on wet and dry strength of paper,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol.
218, no. 1–3, pp. 137–149, 2003.
[58] A. Khakalo et al., “Using gelatin protein to facilitate paper thermoformability,” React. Funct. Polym., vol. 85,
pp. 175–184, 2014.
[59] T. Wu, Y. Du, N. Yan, and R. Farnood, “Cellulose fiber networks reinforced with glutaraldehyde–chitosan
complexes,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 132, no. 33, 2015.
[60] G. G. Xu, C. Q. Yang, and Y. Deng, “Combination of bifunctional aldehydes and poly (vinyl alcohol) as the
crosslinking systems to improve paper wet strength,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 1673–1680, 2004.
[61] N. A. Ibrahim, M. H. Abo‐ Shosha, E. I. Elnagdy, and M. A. Gaffar, “Eco‐ friendly durable press finishing of
cellulose‐ containing fabrics,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 2243–2253, 2002.
42
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[62] V. A. Dehabadi, H.-J. Buschmann, and J. S. Gutmann, “Durable press finishing of cotton fabrics with polyamino
carboxylic acids,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 558–563, 2012.
[63] Y. Kang, Y. K. Choi, H. J. Kim, Y. Song, and H. Kim, “Preparation of anti-bacterial cellulose fiber via
electrospinning and crosslinking with β-cyclodextrin,” Fash. Text., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 11, 2015.
[64] D. F. Caulfield, “Ester crosslinking to improve wet performance of paper using multifunctional carboxylic acids,
butanetetracarboxylic and citric acid,” Tappi J., 1994.
[65] I. Levy, T. Paldi, D. Siegel, I. Shoseyov, and O. Shoseyov, “Cellulose binding domain from Clostridium
cellulovorans as a paper modification reagent,” Nord. PULP Pap. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 421–428, 2003.
[66] M. Euring, M. Rühl, N. Ritter, U. Kües, and A. Kharazipour, “Laccase mediator systems for eco‐ friendly production of medium‐ density fiberboard (MDF) on a pilot scale: physicochemical analysis of the reaction
mechanism,” Biotechnol. J., vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1253–1261, 2011.
[67] K. Putkisto, J. Maijala, J. Grön, and M. Rigdahl, “An approach to the dry-state preparation of coating particles
for use in dry surface treatment of paper,” Prog. Org. coatings, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 257–266, 2004.
[68] Y. Niu, X. Zhang, X. He, J. Zhao, W. Zhang, and C. Lu, “Effective dispersion and crosslinking in PVA/cellulose
fiber biocomposites via solid-state mechanochemistry,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 72, pp. 855–861, 2015.
[69] K. Zhu, X. Li, H. Wang, G. Fei, and J. Li, “Properties and paper sizing application of waterborne polyurethanemicroemulsions: Effects of extender, cross‐ linker, and polyol,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 133, no.
25, 2016.
[70] A. R. Flory, D. V. Requesens, S. P. Devaiah, K. T. Teoh, S. D. Mansfield, and E. E. Hood, “Development of a
green binder system for paper products,” BMC Biotechnol., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 28, 2013.
[71] M. A. Hubbe, “Water and Papermaking I. Fresh Water Components,” Pap. Technol., vol. 48, no. 1, p. 18, 2007.
[72] P. Przybysz, M. Dubowik, M. A. Kucner, K. Przybysz, and K. P. Buzała, “Contribution of hydrogen bonds to
paper strength properties,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, p. e0155809, 2016.
[73] U. Hirn and R. Schennach, “Comprehensive analysis of individual pulp fiber bonds quantifies the mechanisms
of fiber bonding in paper,” Sci. Rep., vol. 5, p. 10503, 2015.
[74] Ž. Knez, E. Markočič, M. Leitgeb, M. Primožič, M. K. Hrnčič, and M. Škerget, “Industrial applications of
supercritical fluids: A review,” Energy, vol. 77, pp. 235–243, 2014.
[75] L. K. Tolonen, M. Bergenstråhle-Wohlert, H. Sixta, and J. Wohlert, “Solubility of cellulose in supercritical water
studied by molecular dynamics simulations,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 4739–4748, 2015.
[76] J. Jung and M. Perrut, “Particle design using supercritical fluids: literature and patent survey,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 179–219, 2001.
[77] M. Sasaki, T. Adschiri, and K. Arai, “Production of cellulose II from native cellulose by near-and supercritical
water solubilization,” J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 51, no. 18, pp. 5376–5381, 2003.
[78] L. Wang, Energy efficiency and management in food processing facilities. CRC press, 2008.
[79] J. Wohlert, L. K. Tolonen, and M. Bergenstråhle-Wohlert, “A simple model for cellulose solubility in supercritical
water,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2015.
[80] J. Buffiere, P. Ahvenainen, M. Borrega, K. Svedström, and H. Sixta, “Supercritical water hydrolysis: a green
pathway for producing low-molecular-weight cellulose,” Green Chem., vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 6516–6525, 2016.
[81] P. G. Debenedetti, J. W. Tom, X. Kwauk, and S.-D. Yeo, “Rapid expansion of supercritical solutions (RESS):
fundamentals and applications,” Fluid Phase Equilib., vol. 82, pp. 311–321, 1993.
[82] M. Mukhopadhyay, “Extraction and processing with supercritical fluids,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 84,
no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2009.
[83] J. Albarellia, A. Paidoshb, D. T. Santosa, F. Maréchalb, and M. A. A. Meirelesa, “Environmental, energetic and
economic evaluation of implementing a supercritical fluid-based nanocellulose production process in a
43
Breakthrough technology roadmap
sugarcane biorefinery,” Chem. Eng., vol. 47, 2016.
[84] A. Blasig and M. C. Thies, “Rapid expansion of cellulose triacetate from ethyl acetate solutions,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 290–299, 2005.
[85] S. Zhenzong and O. Satoko, “Preparation of p-Aramid Aerogels Using Supercritical CO2,” 繊維学会誌, vol. 70,
no. 10, pp. 233–239, 2014.
[86] S. Zheng, X. Hu, A.-R. Ibrahim, D. Tang, Y. Tan, and J. Li, “Supercritical fluid drying: classification and
applications,” Recent Patents Chem. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 230–244, 2010.
[87] M. Kilincel, E. Toklu, and F. Polat, “Classification of Supercritical Drying Methods and a Reactor Design,” J. Eng. Res. Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 217–225, 2015.
[88] G. L. Weibel and C. K. Ober, “An overview of supercritical CO2 applications in microelectronics processing,”
Microelectron. Eng., vol. 65, no. 1–2, pp. 145–152, 2003.
[89] A. S. Mujumdar and L. X. Huang, “Global R&D needs in drying,” Dry. Technol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 647–658,
2007.
[90] S. Maruo, T. Hasegawa, and N. Yoshimura, “Single-anchor support and supercritical CO 2 drying enable high-
precision microfabrication of three-dimensional structures,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 20945–20951,
2009.
[91] H. Sehaqui, Q. Zhou, O. Ikkala, and L. A. Berglund, “Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific
surface area and porosity,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3638–3644, 2011.
[92] H. Sehaqui, B. Michen, E. Marty, L. Schaufelberger, and T. Zimmermann, “Functional cellulose nanofiber filters with enhanced flux for the removal of humic acid by adsorption,” ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 4, no. 9, pp.
4582–4590, 2016.
[93] C. A. Blaney and S. U. Hossain, “Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Recycled Fibers: Removal of Dioxins, Stickies,
and Inactivation of Microbes,” ACS Publications, 1997.
[94] Y. Peng, D. J. Gardner, and Y. Han, “Drying cellulose nanofibrils: in search of a suitable method,” Cellulose,
vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 91–102, 2012.
[95] M. M. R. de Melo, H. M. A. Barbosa, C. P. Passos, and C. M. Silva, “Supercritical fluid extraction of spent coffee
grounds: measurement of extraction curves, oil characterization and economic analysis,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, vol. 86, pp. 150–159, 2014.
[96] C. P. Passos, R. M. Silva, F. A. Da Silva, M. A. Coimbra, and C. M. Silva, “Supercritical fluid extraction of grape
seed (Vitis vinifera L.) oil. Effect of the operating conditions upon oil composition and antioxidant capacity,”
Chem. Eng. J., vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 634–640, 2010.
[97] Z. K. Brown, “The drying of foods using supercritical carbon dioxide.” University of Birmingham, 2010.
[98] M. Svanström, M. Modell, and J. Tester, “Direct energy recovery from primary and secondary sludges by
supercritical water oxidation,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 201–208, 2004.
[99] C. Crampon, A. Mouahid, S.-A. A. Toudji, O. Lépine, and E. Badens, “Influence of pretreatment on supercritical
CO2 extraction from Nannochloropsis oculata,” J. Supercrit. Fluids, vol. 79, pp. 337–344, 2013.
[100] S. R. S. Dev and V. G. S. Raghavan, “Advancements in drying techniques for food, fiber, and fuel,” Dry. Technol., vol. 30, no. 11–12, pp. 1147–1159, 2012.
[101] A. Mahmoud, A. F. A. Hoadley, J.-B. Conrardy, J. Olivier, and J. Vaxelaire, “Influence of process operating parameters on dryness level and energy saving during wastewater sludge electro-dewatering,” Water Res., vol.
103, pp. 109–123, 2016.
[102] J. Olivier, J.-B. Conrardy, A. Mahmoud, and J. Vaxelaire, “Electro-dewatering of wastewater sludge: an investigation of the relationship between filtrate flow rate and electric current,” Water Res., vol. 82, pp. 66–77,
2015.
[103] A. Mahmoud, J. Olivier, J. Vaxelaire, and A. F. A. Hoadley, “Electro-dewatering of wastewater sludge: influence
44
Breakthrough technology roadmap
of the operating conditions and their interactions effects,” Water Res., vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 2795–2810, 2011.
[104] A. Mahmoud, J. Olivier, J. Vaxelaire, and A. F. A. Hoadley, “Electrical field: a historical review of its application
and contributions in wastewater sludge dewatering,” Water Res., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2381–2407, 2010.
[105] D. D. Lucache, A. Bulgaru, D. Ioachim, and E. Dănilă, “On electro-dewatering a cellulosic sludge,” Environ. Eng. Manag. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2009.
[106] G. R. Nair, J. Kurian, A. Singh, and V. Raghavan, “Electro-osmotic dewatering of soaked hemp stems,” Dry. Technol., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 999–1006, 2017.
[107] J. A. Gallego-Juárez, E. Riera, S. De la Fuente Blanco, G. Rodríguez-Corral, V. M. Acosta-Aparicio, and A.
Blanco, “Application of high-power ultrasound for dehydration of vegetables: processes and devices,” Dry. Technol., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1893–1901, 2007.
[108] S. J. Kowalski, A. Pawłowski, J. Szadzińska, J. Łechtańska, and M. Stasiak, “High power airborne ultrasound
assist in combined drying of raspberries,” Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., vol. 34, pp. 225–233, 2016.
[109] M. Bantle and T. M. Eikevik, “A study of the energy efficiency of convective drying systems assisted by
ultrasound in the production of clipfish,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 65, pp. 217–223, 2014.
[110] H. T. Sabarez, J. A. Gallego-Juarez, and E. Riera, “Ultrasonic-assisted convective drying of apple slices,” Dry. Technol., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 989–997, 2012.
[111] C. Peng, A. M. Momen, and S. Moghaddam, “An energy-efficient method for direct-contact ultrasonic cloth
drying,” Energy, vol. 138, pp. 133–138, 2017.
[112] C. Peng, S. Ravi, V. K. Patel, A. M. Momen, and S. Moghaddam, “Physics of direct-contact ultrasonic cloth
drying process,” Energy, vol. 125, pp. 498–508, 2017.
[113] S. De la Fuente-Blanco, E. R.-F. De Sarabia, V. M. Acosta-Aparicio, A. Blanco-Blanco, and J. A. Gallego-Juárez,
“Food drying process by power ultrasound,” Ultrasonics, vol. 44, pp. e523–e527, 2006.
[114] H. H. Salih, L. Wang, V. Patel, V. Namboodiri, and K. Rajagopalan, “The utilization of forward osmosis for coal
tailings dewatering,” Miner. Eng., vol. 81, pp. 142–148, 2015.
[115] N. C. Nguyen, S.-S. Chen, H.-Y. Yang, and N. T. Hau, “Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high
nutrient sludge,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 132, pp. 224–229, 2013.
[116] N. T. Hau, S.-S. Chen, N. C. Nguyen, K. Z. Huang, H. H. Ngo, and W. Guo, “Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as
novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge,” J. Memb. Sci., vol.
455, pp. 305–311, 2014.
[117] R. W. Field and J. J. Wu, “Mass transfer limitations in forward osmosis: are some potential applications
overhyped?,” Desalination, vol. 318, pp. 118–124, 2013.
[118] N. C. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, S.-S. Chen, N. T. Nguyen, and C.-W. Li, “Application of forward osmosis (FO)
under ultrasonication on sludge thickening of waste activated sludge,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 72, no. 8, pp.
1301–1307, 2015.
[119] M. N. Berteli and A. Marsaioli Jr, “Evaluation of short cut pasta air dehydration assisted by microwaves as
compared to the conventional drying process,” J. Food Eng., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2005.
[120] M. Bartholme, G. Avramidis, W. Viöl, and A. Kharazipour, “Microwave drying of wet processed wood fibre
insulating boards,” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 357–360, 2009.
[121] D. Wray and H. S. Ramaswamy, “Development of a microwave–vacuum-based dehydration technique for fresh
and microwave–osmotic (MWODS) pretreated whole cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon),” Dry. Technol., vol.
33, no. 7, pp. 796–807, 2015.
[122] E. Azarpazhooh and H. S. Ramaswamy, “Microwave-osmotic dehydration of apples under continuous flow
medium spray conditions: comparison with other methods,” Dry. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2009.
[123] D. Kumar, S. Prasad, and G. S. Murthy, “Optimization of microwave-assisted hot air drying conditions of okra
using response surface methodology,” J. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 221–232, 2014.
45
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[124] P. Kumar, “Effect of microwave drying on paper properties,” Master Eng. Chem. Eng. Mcgill Univ. Canada,
1991.
[125] A. M. Hasna, “Curing starch based adhesives: microwave or conventional,” Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., vol.
19, no. 3–4, pp. 259–274, 2003.
[126] B. E. Prasad and K. K. Pandey, “Microwave drying of bamboo,” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., vol. 70, no. 1–3, pp.
353–355, 2012.
[127] D. Atong, P. Ratanadecho, and S. Vongpradubchai, “Drying of a slip casting for tableware product using
microwave continuous belt dryer,” Dry. Technol., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 589–594, 2006.
[128] S. Vongpradubchai and P. Rattanadecho, “The microwave processing of wood using a continuous microwave
belt drier,” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 997–1003, 2009.
[129] R. Prommas, P. Rattanadecho, and W. Jindarat, “Energy and exergy analyses in drying process of non-
hygroscopic porous packed bed using a combined multi-feed microwave-convective air and continuous belt
system (CMCB),” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2012.
[130] M. Leiker and M. A. Adamska, “Energy efficiency and drying rates during vacuum microwave drying of wood,”
Holz als Roh-und Werkst., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 203–208, 2004.
[131] I. Imenokhoyev, H. Windsheimer, R. Waitz, N. Kintsel, and H. Linn, “Microwave heating technology: potentials
and limits,” in Ceramic Forum International, 2013, vol. 90, no. 4.
[132] P. Kumar, A. S. Mujumdar, and Z. Koran, “Microwave drying: effects on paper properties,” Dry. Technol., vol.
8, no. 5, pp. 1061–1087, 1990.
[133] B. Skubic, M. Lakner, and I. Plazl, “Microwave drying of expanded perlite insulation board,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 3314–3321, 2012.
[134] H. S. Ku, E. Siores, A. Taube, and J. A. R. Ball, “Productivity improvement through the use of industrial
microwave technologies,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 42, no. 2–4, pp. 281–290, 2002.
[135] A. Sander, N. Bolf, and J. P. Kardum, “Research on dynamics and drying time in microwave paper drying,”
Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 159–164, 2003.
[136] N. Castrillo, A. Mercado, and C. Volzone, “Sorption Water by Modified Bentonite,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 8,
pp. 391–396, 2015.
[137] K. J. Chua and S. K. Chou, “Low-cost drying methods for developing countries,” Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol.
14, no. 12, pp. 519–528, 2003.
[138] A. Barati, M. Kokabi, and M. H. N. Famili, “Drying of gelcast ceramic parts via the liquid desiccant method,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2265–2272, 2003.
[139] K. Nagaya, Y. Li, Z. Jin, M. Fukumuro, Y. Ando, and A. Akaishi, “Low-temperature desiccant-based food drying
system with airflow and temperature control,” J. Food Eng., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2006.
[140] S. Misha, S. Mat, M. H. Ruslan, and K. Sopian, “Review of solid/liquid desiccant in the drying applications and
its regeneration methods,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4686–4707, 2012.
[141] M. Kubota, T. Hanada, S. Yabe, and H. Matsuda, “Regeneration characteristics of desiccant rotor with
microwave and hot-air heating,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1576–1581, 2013.
[142] X. Wang, R. Wang, C. Peng, H. Li, B. Liu, and Z. Wang, “Thermoresponsive gelcasting: improved drying of
gelcast bodies,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1679–1682, 2011.
[143] S. Yamaguchi and H. Kawasaki, “Basic research for rice drying with silica gel,” Dry. Technol., vol. 12, no. 5, pp.
1053–1067, 1994.
[144] X. J. Zhang, K. Sumathy, Y. J. Dai, and R. Z. Wang, “Dynamic hygroscopic effect of the composite material
used in desiccant rotary wheel,” Sol. energy, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 1058–1061, 2006.
[145] N. Castrillo, A. Mercado, and C. Bolzone, “Reversibility studies of clay hydration degree in its natural and
46
Breakthrough technology roadmap
composite condition,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 135–141, 2015.
[146] M. Sultan, I. I. El-Sharkawy, T. Miyazaki, B. B. Saha, and S. Koyama, “An overview of solid desiccant
dehumidification and air conditioning systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 46, pp. 16–29, 2015.
[147] H. Romdhana, C. Bonazzi, and M. Esteban-Decloux, “Superheated steam drying: An overview of pilot and
industrial dryers with a focus on energy efficiency,” Dry. Technol., vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1255–1274, 2015.
[148] Y. Bao and Y. Zhou, “Comparative study of moisture absorption and dimensional stability of Chinese cedar wood with conventional drying and superheated steam drying,” Dry. Technol., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 860–866,
2017.
[149] H. C. Van Deventer and R. M. H. Heijmans, “Drying with superheated steam,” Dry. Technol., vol. 19, no. 8, pp.
2033–2045, 2001.
[150] J. M. McCall and W. J. M. Douglas, “Use of superheated steam drying to increase strength and bulk of papers
produced from diverse commercial furnishes,” Dry. Technol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 2006.
[151] A. S. Mujumdar and C. L. Law, “Drying technology: trends and applications in postharvest processing,” Food Bioprocess Technol., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 843–852, 2010.
[152] A. Alfy, B. V Kiran, G. C. Jeevitha, and H. U. Hebbar, “Recent developments in superheated steam processing
of foods—a review,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 56, no. 13, pp. 2191–2208, 2016.
[153] A. Koponen, K. Torvinen, A. Jasberg, and H. Kiiskinen, “Foam forming of long fibers,” Nord. PULP Pap. Res. J., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 2016.
[154] E. Delgado et al., “Zwitterion modification of fibres: Effect of fibre flexibility on wet strength of paper,” J. pulp Pap. Sci., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 141–144, 2004.
[155] I. Mira, M. Andersson, L. Boge, I. Blute, and G. Carlsson, “Foam forming revisited Part I. Foaming behaviour of
fibre-surfactant systems,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 679–688, 2014.
[156] I. Mira and M. Andersson, “Foam forming revisited. Part II. Effect of surfactant on the properties of foam-
formed paper products,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 689–699, 2014.
[157] A. M. Al-Qararah, T. Hjelt, K. Kinnunen, N. Beletski, and J. A. Ketoja, “Exceptional pore size distribution in
foam-formed fibre networks,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., vol. 27, no. 2, p. 226, 2012.
[158] J. R. Ajmeri and C. J. Ajmeri, “Nonwoven materials and technologies for medical applications,” in Handbook of Medical Textiles, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 106–131.
[159] S. Maity, D. P. Gon, and P. Paul, “A review of flax nonwovens: Manufacturing, properties, and applications,” J. Nat. Fibers, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 365–390, 2014.
[160] M. Tausif and S. J. Russell, “Characterisation of the z-directional tensile strength of composite hydroentangled
nonwovens,” Polym. Test., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 944–952, 2012.
[161] B. Liu and T. Huang, “A novel wound dressing composed of nonwoven fabric coated with chitosan and herbal
extract membrane for wound healing,” Polym. Compos., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1037–1046, 2010.
[162] Y. Fang, A. D. Dulaney, J. Gadley, J. M. Maia, and C. J. Ellison, “Manipulating characteristic timescales and
fiber morphology in simultaneous centrifugal spinning and photopolymerization,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 73, pp.
42–51, 2015.
[163] S. Müller-Herrmann and T. Scheibel, “Enzymatic degradation of films, particles, and nonwoven meshes made
of a recombinant spider silk protein,” ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 247–259, 2015.
[164] H. J. Lee, S. Lee, H. Ko, K. H. Kim, and I.-G. Choi, “An expansin-like protein from Hahella chejuensis binds
cellulose and enhances cellulase activity,” Mol. Cells, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 379–385, 2010.
[165] I. Dal Pra, A. Chiarini, A. Boschi, G. Freddi, and U. Armato, “Novel dermo-epidermal equivalents on silk fibroin-
based formic acid-crosslinked three-dimensional nonwoven devices with prospective applications in human
tissue engineering/regeneration/repair,” Int. J. Mol. Med., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 241–247, 2006.
47
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[166] M. Fortea-Verdejo, K.-Y. Lee, T. Zimmermann, and A. Bismarck, “Upgrading flax nonwovens: Nanocellulose as binder to produce rigid and robust flax fibre preforms,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 83, pp. 63–71,
2016.
[167] C. Liu et al., “Microporous CA/PVDF membranes based on electrospun nanofibers with controlled crosslinking
induced by solvent vapor,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 512, pp. 1–12, 2016.
[168] X. Fang et al., “Facile immobilization of gold nanoparticles into electrospun polyethyleneimine/polyvinyl alcohol
nanofibers for catalytic applications,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4493–4501, 2011.
[169] R. Wang et al., “Nanofibrous microfiltration membranes capable of removing bacteria, viruses and heavy metal
ions,” J. Memb. Sci., vol. 446, pp. 376–382, 2013.
[170] C. Gualandi, P. Torricelli, S. Panzavolta, S. Pagani, M. L. Focarete, and A. Bigi, “An innovative co-axial system
to electrospin in situ crosslinked gelatin nanofibers,” Biomed. Mater., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 25007, 2016.
[171] N. Fedorova and B. Pourdeyhimi, “High strength nylon micro‐ and nanofiber based nonwovens via
spunbonding,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 3434–3442, 2007.
[172] S. Sinha-Ray, S. Khansari, A. L. Yarin, and B. Pourdeyhimi, “Effect of chemical and physical cross-linking on
tensile characteristics of solution-blown soy protein nanofiber mats,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 51, no. 46, pp.
15109–15121, 2012.
[173] M. Lewandowski, M. Amiot, and A. Perwuelz, “Development and Characterization of 3D Nonwoven
Composites,” in Materials Science Forum, 2012, vol. 714, pp. 131–137.
[174] A. Pramanik, A. Paikar, and D. Haldar, “Sonication-induced instant fibrillation and fluorescent labeling of
tripeptide fibers,” RSC Adv., vol. 5, no. 66, pp. 53886–53892, 2015.
[175] C. A. Eckert, D. Bush, J. S. Brown, and C. L. Liotta, “Tuning solvents for sustainable technology,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 4615–4621, 2000.
[176] A. Roselli, M. Hummel, J. Vartiainen, K. Nieminen, and H. Sixta, “Understanding the role of water in the
interaction of ionic liquids with wood polymers,” Carbohydr. Polym., vol. 168, pp. 121–128, 2017.
[177] H. Sixta et al., “Novel concepts of dissolving pulp production,” Cellulose, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1547–1561, 2013.
[178] H. Mertaniemi, A. Laukkanen, J.-E. Teirfolk, O. Ikkala, and R. H. A. Ras, “Functionalized porous microparticles
of nanofibrillated cellulose for biomimetic hierarchically structured superhydrophobic surfaces,” RSC Adv., vol.
2, no. 7, pp. 2882–2886, 2012.
[179] Y. Zhong, G. Cavender, and Y. Zhao, “Investigation of different coating application methods on the
performance of edible coatings on Mozzarella cheese,” LWT-Food Sci. Technol., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2014.
[180] A. Valdés, N. Burgos, A. Jiménez, and M. C. Garrigós, “Natural pectin polysaccharides as edible coatings,”
Coatings, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 865–886, 2015.
[181] S. E. Khalida and W. N. W. Busub, “STARCH-BASED EDIBLE FILM AND COATING FROM LOCAL PACHYRHIZUS
EROSUS.”
[182] N. HROMIŠ et al., “Investigation of a product-specific active packaging material based on chitosan biofilm with
spice oleoresins.,” J. Food Nutr. Res., vol. 55, no. 1, 2016.
[183] M. S. L. Ferreira, A. E. C. Fai, C. T. Andrade, P. H. Picciani, E. G. Azero, and É. C. B. A. Gonçalves, “Edible films and coatings based on biodegradable residues applied to acerolas (Malpighia punicifolia L.),” J. Sci. Food Agric., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1634–1642, 2016.
[184] L. Wang, J. Wang, X. Lin, and X. Tang, “Preparation and in vitro evaluation of gliclazide sustained-release
matrix pellets: formulation and storage stability,” Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 814–822, 2010.
[185] R. K. Dhall, “Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 435–450, 2013.
[186] N. Sumonsiri and S. A. Barringer, “Effect of powder and target properties on wrap around effect during
coating,” J. Food Sci., vol. 75, no. 8, 2010.
48
Breakthrough technology roadmap
[187] M. K. I. Khan, M. A. I. Schutyser, K. Schroën, and R. M. Boom, “Electrostatic powder coating of foods–State of
the art and opportunities,” J. Food Eng., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012.
[188] T. Wirth and D. Meck, “Binder Systems for Novel Coating Concepts in the Web-fed Offset Sector,” Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 128(13), pp. 905–912, 2000.
[189] J. Lipponen, J. Gron, S. E. Bruun, and T. Laine, “Surface sizing with starch solutions at solids contents up to
18%,” J. pulp Pap. Sci., vol. 30, no. 3, p. 82, 2004.
[190] A. M. M. Sousa, A. M. Sereno, L. Hilliou, and M. P. Gonçalves, “Biodegradable agar extracted from gracilaria
vermiculophylla: film properties and application to edible coating,” in Materials Science Forum, 2010, vol. 636,
pp. 739–744.
[191] M. Farmahini‐ Farahani, H. Xiao, and Y. Zhao, “Poly lactic acid nanocomposites containing modified nanoclay
with synergistic barrier to water vapor for coated paper,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 131, no. 20, 2014.
[192] W. Scholz, W. Kamutzki, and R. Pelzer, “Crosslinkers for paper coating,” Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 134(22), pp. 1343–1346, 2006.
[193] H. Taniguchi, S. Sunada, and J. Oi, “Novel Approach to Plastic Card Overcoating Process,” in NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, 2012, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 84–87.
[194] Y. Hoashi, Y. Tozuka, and H. Takeuchi, “Solventless dry powder coating for sustained drug release using mechanochemical treatment based on the tri-component system of acetaminophen, carnauba wax and
glidant,” Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 259–265, 2013.
[195] E. Z. Dahmash and A. R. Mohammed, “Functionalised particles using dry powder coating in pharmaceutical
drug delivery: promises and challenges,” Expert Opin. Drug Deliv., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1867–1879, 2015.
[196] J. Lahti, M. Tuominen, and J. Kuusipalo, “The effects of surface treatment on digital print quality of extrusion
coated paperboard,” in 35th International Research Conference Advances in Printing and Media Technology.
[197] M. Rahmah, S. A. Mohammad, M. S. Khaled, N. Norwimie, and F. M. Ahmad, “Degradation behaviour and
kinetics of UV cured epoxidised soybean oil derivatives,” in Advanced Materials Research, 2011, vol. 230, pp.
94–98.
[198] G. P. J. Dijkema and L. Basson, “Complexity and Industrial Ecology,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–164,
2009.
[199] Z. Chen, J. F. Wu, S. Fernando, and K. Jagodzinski, “Soy-based, high biorenewable content UV curable
coatings,” Prog. Org. Coatings, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2011.
[200] A.-G. El-Demerdash, “Photocuring Reaction of Poly (Glycidyl Methacrylate-Co-N, N’-Dimethyl Acrylamide) using
Photogenerated Amine from Bis (4-Formyl Aminophenyl) Methane for Photoresist Applications,” High Perform. Polym., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 371–381, 2007.
[201] A. Yializis, A; Goodyear, G; Vieira, “FINISHING OF WOVEN AND WOVEN AND NON WOVEN TEXTILES USING A
SOLVENTLESS AND WATERLESS PROCESS,” in “86th Textile-Institute World Conference ,” 2008, pp. 242–251.
[202] C. ZHAN, S. FENG, S. XIE, C. LIU, J. LIANG, and Y. GAO, “Curing Properties of Water-based Self-drying/Fast-
drying Foundry Coating,” 2015.
[203] Y. Yoo, J. B. You, W. Choi, and S. G. Im, “A stacked polymer film for robust superhydrophobic fabrics,” Polym. Chem., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1664–1671, 2013.
[204] R. G. Szafran, W. Ludwig, and A. Kmiec, “New spout-fluid bed apparatus for electrostatic coating of fine
particles and encapsulation,” Powder Technol., vol. 225, pp. 52–57, 2012.
[205] P. Bumroongsri, W. Witchayanuwat, and S. Kheawhom, “Experimental Heat Transfer Coefficients of Waste
Heat Recovery Unit in Detergent Manufacturing Process,” Exp. Heat Transf., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 114–125, 2013.
[206] L. Z. Zhang and J. L. Niu, “Energy requirements for conditioning fresh air and the long-term savings with a
membrane-based energy recovery ventilator in Hong Kong,” Energy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 2001.
[207] L.-Z. Zhang, “Heat and mass transfer in a total heat exchanger: cross-corrugated triangular ducts with
49
Breakthrough technology roadmap
composite supported liquid membrane,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl., vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1195–1210,
2008.
[208] Y. D. Tu, R. Z. Wang, T. S. Ge, and X. Zheng, “Comfortable, high-efficiency heat pump with desiccant-coated,
water-sorbing heat exchangers,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, p. 40437, 2017.
[209] Y. Zhou, C. Shi, and G. Dong, “Analysis of a mechanical vapor recompression wastewater distillation system,”
Desalination, vol. 353, pp. 91–97, 2014.
[210] G. Mohan, S. Dahal, U. Kumar, A. Martin, and H. Kayal, “Development of natural gas fired combined cycle
plant for tri-generation of power, cooling and clean water using waste heat recovery: techno-economic
analysis,” Energies, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 6358–6381, 2014.
[211] M. Aziz, Y. Kansha, and A. Tsutsumi, “Self-heat recuperative fluidized bed drying of brown coal,” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 944–951, 2011.
[212] M. Aziz et al., “Innovative Energy‐ Efficient Biomass Drying Based on Self‐Heat Recuperation Technology,”
Chem. Eng. Technol., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1095–1103, 2011.
[213] C. Fushimi and K. Fukui, “Simplification and energy saving of drying process based on self-heat recuperation
technology,” Dry. Technol., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 667–678, 2014.
[214] K. Savas and A. Basman, “Infrared drying: a promising technique for bulgur production,” J. Cereal Sci., vol. 68,
pp. 31–37, 2016.
[215] I. Doymaz, “Suitability of Thin‐ Layer Drying Models for Infrared Drying of Peach Slices,” J. food Process. Preserv., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 2232–2239, 2014.
[216] C. M. McLoughlin, W. A. M. McMinn, and T. R. A. Magee, “Microwave drying of multi-component powder
systems,” Dry. Technol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 293–309, 2003.
[217] J. A. Gallego-Juarez, “High-power ultrasonic processing: recent developments and prospective advances,”
Phys. Procedia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2010.
[218] C. Ozuna, J. A. Cárcel, P. M. Walde, and J. V Garcia-Perez, “Low-temperature drying of salted cod (Gadus
morhua) assisted by high power ultrasound: Kinetics and physical properties,” Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., vol. 23, pp. 146–155, 2014.
[219] J. Warczok, M. Gierszewska, W. Kujawski, and C. Güell, “Application of osmotic membrane distillation for
reconcentration of sugar solutions from osmotic dehydration,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 425–
429, 2007.
[220] J. Olivier, A. Mahmoud, J. Vaxelaire, J.-B. Conrardy, M. Citeau, and E. Vorobiev, “Electro-dewatering of
anaerobically digested and activated sludges: an energy aspect analysis,” Dry. Technol., vol. 32, no. 9, pp.
1091–1103, 2014.
[221] J.-B. Conrardy, J. Vaxelaire, and J. Olivier, “Electro-dewatering of activated sludge: electrical resistance
analysis,” Water Res., vol. 100, pp. 194–200, 2016.
[222] L. Wang, L. Zhang, and A. Li, “Hydrothermal treatment coupled with mechanical expression at increased temperature for excess sludge dewatering: Influence of operating conditions and the process energetics,”
Water Res., vol. 65, pp. 85–97, 2014.
[223] I. C. Claussen, T. S. Ustad, I. Str⊘ mmen, and P. M. Walde, “Atmospheric freeze drying—A review,” Dry. Technol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 947–957, 2007.
[224] M. K. Mohanty, Z. Wang, Z. Huang, and J. Hirschi, “Optimization of the dewatering performance of a steel belt
filter,” Coal Prep., vol. 24, no. 1–2, pp. 53–68, 2004.
[225] M. Huttunen et al., “Specific energy consumption of cake dewatering with vacuum filters,” Miner. Eng., vol.
100, pp. 144–154, 2017.
[226] P. de Cuadro et al., “Cross-linking of cellulose and poly (ethylene glycol) with citric acid,” React. Funct. Polym., vol. 90, pp. 21–24, 2015.
50
Breakthrough technology roadmap