Top Banner
Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals. Jasimudeen S. & Vimal Kumar V. Research Scholars School of Social Sciences Mahatma Gandhi University
13

Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Feb 19, 2017

Download

Education

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals.

Jasimudeen S. & Vimal Kumar V.Research ScholarsSchool of Social SciencesMahatma Gandhi University

Page 2: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

“Academic Racketeering”

Rapid rise of predatory journals,

Publications taking large fees without providing robust editorial or publishing services,

Predatory journals attract authors through aggressive marketing and spam emails, promising quick review and open access publication for a price.

Page 3: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

The preys

Motive is financial gain, and they are corrupting the communication of science,

Their main victims are institutions and researchers in low and middle income countries, and the time has come to act rather than simply to decry them.

Page 4: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Features of predatory journals

Insufficient contact information,

Broad area of subject to attract more articles (Journal of Social Sciences),

Journals treat two or more fields of study together (e.g. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology),

Sky high claims like “leading publisher”,

Fake/similar ISSN and absence of article DOI.

Page 5: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Reasons behind the growth of predatory journals

The introduction of academic performance indicator (API) by the UGC,

The focus on quantity over quality,

Lack of publishing avenues; absence of higher education institutions in scholarly publishing industry,

Lack of national machinery to monitor scholarly publishing industry,

Page 6: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Publication experience with a predatory journalThe manuscript, entitled “Deconstructing Access Points” was submitted on January 29th, 2009, to

The Open Information Science Journal (TOISCIJ),

a journal that claims to enforce peer-review.

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/nonsense-for-dollars/

Paper was generated using Scigen

Paper was accepted and asked for submission fee

The acceptance letter read: This is to inform you that your submitted article has been accepted for publication after peer-

reviewing process in TOISCIJ. I would be highly grateful to you if you please fill and sign the attached fee form and covering letter

and send them back via email as soon as possible to avoid further delay in publication.

Page 7: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals
Page 8: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Fake manuscript

Page 9: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Paper submission

Page 10: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Asking advancement payment

Page 11: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Quick publishing process !!

Page 12: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

Beware of predatory journalsIs the publisher listed in any blacklist (Beall’s List),

Check in any whitelist like DOAJ,

Searching for the journal in databases (PubMedCentral, Web of Science),

Credible journals follow transparency in editorial and peer review processes.

Page 13: Crouching tiger and rejoice jackals: Scholarly vs predatory Open Access journals

ConclusionAvailability of National and international whitelist of journals,

Availability of more Open Access journals from research centres and higher education institutions,

Need more generous funding to initiate Open Access journals,

Need to encourage continuous (frequency) journals to accommodate more articles.